| Doc_id | Review | Left | Term | Right | Sentiment | Polarity | Rating |
| -0BI9jXyEeWa2g6sjqf03Q | This was my favorite course in the Social Media Marketing Specialization. Wonderful insight on blog creation and content development. Thank you! | Wonderful insight on blog creation and | Content | development. Thank you! | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| -0BI9jXyEeWa2g6sjqf03Q | Great content! Applicable right away. Very engaging delivery and presenters. | Great | Content | Applicable right away. Very engaging delivery | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| -0BI9jXyEeWa2g6sjqf03Q | Good content and examples | Good | Content | and examples | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| -1YwAnTLEeSjmyIAC0aXFg | Perfect Course for Supply Chain Professionals. Very good Content and Well Delivered. | for Supply Chain Professionals. Very good | Content | and Well Delivered. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Has interesting ideas and approach to forming a structure way of analysing a problem. The module does feel a little thin in content, and perhaps should be combined with Exploratory Analysis. | does feel a little thin in | Content | and perhaps should be combined with | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | content is not enough for one class. should be only one to two videos. | | Content | is not enough for one class. | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Course content is okay - there was some repetition of topics throughout the weeks. As the other first courses in the specialization, students would benefit tremendously if the instructors were a bit more active - the course feels out of date and abandoned. | Course | Content | is okay - there was some | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Excellently designed course! I loved how the course content and assignments were designed and delivered. | course! I loved how the course | Content | and assignments were designed and delivered. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | I've already written a review but it seems to have been removed... This is an awful course, there is very little purpose to it whatsoever, it is basically a module in markdown which will in all honesty not have much application for most learners. In addition, the course is not at all balanced / laid out well, there is a peer assignment in week 1, which you need to have covered week 2's content for. Lastly, the recording quality of some of the lectures is awful, it is clear that they have simply used some recordings of an actual classroom session of a related course instead of recording for Coursera. In all honesty, this entire specialisation is of awful quality, it is not a data science course, it is a "here's a few useful things in R" course, and the instructors should be ashamed that their institution makes money from it. | need to have covered week 2's | Content | for. Lastly, the recording quality of | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | The content is good but the contents have a lot of overlap. The instructors are definitely knowledgeble about the material and clear about the presentation but a lot of the same matierial are repeated throughout the course unintentionally. Think the insturctors just thought it was enough to throw a bunch of things together and called it the day. | The | Content | is good but the contents have | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | The content is good but the contents have a lot of overlap. The instructors are definitely knowledgeble about the material and clear about the presentation but a lot of the same matierial are repeated throughout the course unintentionally. Think the insturctors just thought it was enough to throw a bunch of things together and called it the day. | The content is good but the | Content | have a lot of overlap. The | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | This is a great course that teaches students about the importance of reproducibility for research and data analyses. It provides tools that help a scientist to thoroughly document and publish their research in a fully reproducible way and it shows the current best practices for reproducibility. All the course content is very clearly explained and the assignments help reinforce the students' learning process. | practices for reproducibility. All the course | Content | is very clearly explained and the | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | It's, for sure, a necessary content but don't feel like something that deserves to be on this specialization. Content is good. | It's, for sure, a necessary | Content | but don't feel like something that | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | It's, for sure, a necessary content but don't feel like something that deserves to be on this specialization. Content is good. | deserves to be on this specialization. | Content | is good. | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | The professor has an immense amount of charisma and a concise way of breaking down concepts. The content material is short and to the point. These short lectures allow the student to even explore philosophies of economics in detail giving a big picture to what the issues at hand are with Law, Policy, and Climate Change. Great lectures, materials, discussions, and extremely effective Professor. Highly recommend. | way of breaking down concepts. The | Content | material is short and to the | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | The instructor was engaging, the content was interesting, and the structure held up very well as a self-paced course. | The instructor was engaging, the | Content | was interesting, and the structure held | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | Great course. Really enjoyed this introduction to environmental law and policy. Many issues and concepts were covered and the professor delivered the content in a interesting and well structured manner. | covered and the professor delivered the | Content | in a interesting and well structured | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | The contents of this lecture are profound and can review variety cases. I recommend this course to who works as lawyer and are interested in environmental dispute cases. | The | Content | of this lecture are profound and | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | I really liked this Course. Although I am not a lawyer and more environmental engineer, the professor explain different environmental law cases (Waste, Soil, Water, Air) in an easy-going manner. It was simple but very strong content! 100% recommendable!! | It was simple but very strong | Content | 100% recommendable! ! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | Excellent overview, interesting presenter (passionate about subject, knowledgeable and entertaining) and well organized in content. I would strongly recommend to anyone interested in environmental law. | and entertaining) and well organized in | Content | I would strongly recommend to anyone | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | I thought the course was a fantastic introduction to environmental law and policy. I especially enjoyed the structure of each lesson (reading -> video) and the entire course. I thought the Prof did a great job of being enthusiastic and was mostly clear when explaining, analyzing and discussing each case. Perhaps, an aspect that could be improved in the future is to ask more in-video question to challenge the student to think critically while watching the videos. However, where there is most room for improvement is to have much better management of the discussion section. There was no authority answering any questions whatsoever, not content related nor operational. | authority answering any questions whatsoever, not | Content | related nor operational. | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| -ebwLHHsEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | Great content, but there is no point to keep automated-grading closed for auditing students. | Great | Content | but there is no point to | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| -ENqh2hTEeWWkAqJuEibFQ | Course content sometimes too boring | Course | Content | sometimes too boring | Negative | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | I think people who have experience in studying science will take better advantage of this course but, in general, it has great content. | but, in general, it has great | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | For anyone that has lived with a dog, much of this content will be common knowledge. The value is the scientific and technical studies done to validate those assumptions. | with a dog, much of this | Content | will be common knowledge. The value | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | Great course, just a little too much selling towards the end I felt. But top-notch videos, and interesting content for sure! | felt. But top-notch videos, and interesting | Content | for sure! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | It was a great course for all dog lovers! The content was so interesting with types experiments and games to better understand our pet dogs. Also the scientific findings are so suprising for us to really know who our dogs are. Go through this, your dog-knowing journey will be wonderful!! | course for all dog lovers! The | Content | was so interesting with types experiments | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | What a wonderful class. I have found very few colleges that offer aclass in regards to animals, unless you're majoring as a vet. This class gives me the option to learn about my best friend (my dog) and how to apply my learned skills to better his life. The course content is easy to understand and exciting for an avid animal lover. Thank you Coursera, for changing how education is delivered. #rethinkcollege | to better his life. The course | Content | is easy to understand and exciting | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | I just do not feel a connection with this professor - he is constantly plugging his book and the website. The content is just not engaging. | his book and the website. The | Content | is just not engaging. | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | Absolutely amazing course! Everything is explained really well and I loved the content! | really well and I loved the | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | Really interesting information about the evolution of dogs, their cognitive approach to problem solving and their relationship to humans. Just the tip of the iceberg but a great jumping off point to further understanding man's best friend. Content was presented in a way that was easy to follow and complete at your own pace. | to further understanding man's best friend. | Content | was presented in a way that | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | The content was interesting but the lectures could have been taped in a more engaging manner. | The | Content | was interesting but the lectures could | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | I love some of the discussions in this course, and i think that students can be prompted to contribute even more. Perhaps make contributing to a discussion in each module an essential part of the course? The content is well-structured, going from a general overview of evolution to canine cognition. I would have liked to see it go even further, questioning the assumptions behind some of the recent research publications in this area instead of just including it in this course. A little more critical reasoning doesn't hurt. | essential part of the course? The | Content | is well-structured, going from a general | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | This is a fun course. However, there is not much content on dog emotion, and lots on evolution (not limited to dogs). It is straightforward and slowly enough paced that no one should be afraid it will be too difficult for them, and the instructor is enthusiastic and eloquent. I have a PhD in a related field and I learned quite a bit, so I would recommend this course to others. | course. However, there is not much | Content | on dog emotion, and lots on | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Course Content and everything was good, video lectures have some disturbance please delete that noise. | Course | Content | and everything was good, video lectures | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| -N44X0IJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Following the overall quality of this Specialization, this course was excellent. From the content, to the assesments, material and teachers. This course is a really good starting point to become an expert in Machine Learning techniques. | this course was excellent. From the | Content | to the assesments, material and teachers. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| -N44X0IJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Interesting content but explanations are less clear with respect to the other courses of the ML Specialization | Interesting | Content | but explanations are less clear with | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| -nkoihN6EeWCWhKuhISYpw | Excellent! Impressive content. Thank you | Excellent! Impressive | Content | Thank you | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| -nkoihN6EeWCWhKuhISYpw | Fantastic!!! Very useful. highly Interesting content | ! ! Very useful. highly Interesting | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| -nRRAPmuEeSndSIAC7LTLQ | I learned so much in this class and the instructor did a great job explaining the contents | did a great job explaining the | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| -nRRAPmuEeSndSIAC7LTLQ | While I did not have time to complete the final assignment I did find this course useful for creating a firmer understanding of Ableton Live. The peer review process is a great idea and something which I found to be both engaging and useful for networking with fellow artists. The content of the course I feel is probably useful to someone with no prior knowledge of DAWs, but this is not my first DAW. As such the course felt a little slow and the assignments a little unchallenging. Personally my peer review experience ranged from listening to fully fleshed out ideas to listening to uninspired loops of nonsense. I still feel as though I benefited from the process, however, and I gained an invaluable resource in Blend. I would love a next level - fleshing out some of the ideas touched on throughout the course, as well as exploring other ideas such as sidechaining. | for networking with fellow artists. The | Content | of the course I feel is | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| -qKIDPnAEeS1QCIACy-KcQ | Quite liked the didactic way the course was presented, and its objectivity. Both the content for studies and activities were very well prepared, the teachers and all the staff are to be congratulated! Thanks, | presented, and its objectivity. Both the | Content | for studies and activities were very | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| -qKIDPnAEeS1QCIACy-KcQ | Fabulously presented, well paced, challenging and even cute! I learned so much more that I bargained for and will be reviewing course content over and over, thanks to the ability to download content. Thank you for a wonderful course that took me well out of my comfort zone, but encouraged me too. | for and will be reviewing course | Content | over and over, thanks to the | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| -qKIDPnAEeS1QCIACy-KcQ | Fabulously presented, well paced, challenging and even cute! I learned so much more that I bargained for and will be reviewing course content over and over, thanks to the ability to download content. Thank you for a wonderful course that took me well out of my comfort zone, but encouraged me too. | thanks to the ability to download | Content | Thank you for a wonderful course | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| -qKIDPnAEeS1QCIACy-KcQ | Excellent methodology and content to learn concepts of software engineering and how to program! Recommended to all who want initiating in programming and even to those who already build their own programs! | Excellent methodology and | Content | to learn concepts of software engineering | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| -Y69EP9dEeSa0SIACyGBQw | Very well made, great contents. The only reason I removed a star is it seemed to me there was more topics in the quizes than in the course itself in the first part. It was a bit confusing and the quizes required to look up information on the internet and there was no real way to know these topics would be in the quizes. Otherwise, I enjoyed the class and learned a gread deal. | Very well made, great | Content | The only reason I removed a | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| -Y69EP9dEeSa0SIACyGBQw | Excellent course! The content is great in quality, quantity and structure!! 5 stars to that! However, I am giving 4 stars since passing the course or not depends mostly on Extension Exercises, which at the beginning seem to be optional but they in fact mandatory. | Excellent course! The | Content | is great in quality, quantity and | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| -Y69EP9dEeSa0SIACyGBQw | This was truly and excellent introduction to systems engineering. The facilitators presented the course content in the simplest methodology, utilizing diagrams to aid comprehension. The exercises and extended-exercises gave an opportunity to apply the knowledge acquired to verify and validate complete understanding and application of the course materials. | engineering. The facilitators presented the course | Content | in the simplest methodology, utilizing diagrams | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| -Y69EP9dEeSa0SIACyGBQw | Very good content and delivered in an effective manner. Lots of information and examples are quite valuable and not provided in the slides so I recommend everyone to have the handouts at hand when studying for the assignments and exams. | Very good | Content | and delivered in an effective manner. | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| -zH9iof2EeWGBwqGAoUFww | What can I say? An extremely complete course, very resourceful, dynamic and with great quality content from reliable sources. If you are interested in genetics, you will love this take on epigenetics; definitely worth it. | resourceful, dynamic and with great quality | Content | from reliable sources. If you are | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 00citU52EeW2EwoziUhyxQ | Nice Videos. Nice Guys. Nice Content. | Nice Videos. Nice Guys. Nice | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 05pzg84jEeWUiA71osk_NQ | je suis très content d'avoir suivi ce cours qui m'a apporté beaucoup de connaissances en matière de ppp et surtout les politiques et pratiques. Je m'y suis beaucoup consacré depuis le début puisque j'avais du temps à mettre à profit. ça sera pour moi une grande opportunité de pouvoir entamer un stage dans le domaine des ppp. J'espère donc que la Banque Mondiale m'offrira une telle opportunité ou en tout cas m'orientera vers des opportunités que je pourrai saisir et mettre en pratique tous les enseignements que j'ai eus pendant ce cours. | je suis très | Content | d'avoir suivi ce cours qui m'a | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 05pzg84jEeWUiA71osk_NQ | Je suis content d'avoir mon certificat et je remercie mes enseignants. | Je suis | Content | d'avoir mon certificat et je remercie | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | This course is very well presented and the content has been made easy to follow through the use of simple succinct language and examples that are easy to relate to. An excellent place to start. | is very well presented and the | Content | has been made easy to follow | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Great course, easy to understand but profound in content! | easy to understand but profound in | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Very general content. Not as useful as I thought it would be, but maybe I should have read the introduction better:) | Very general | Content | Not as useful as I thought | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | it was very simple , but i expected more content | simple , but i expected more | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Great, engaging lecturer - Content was at the level described. Fantastic course! | Great, engaging lecturer - | Content | was at the level described. Fantastic | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Decent with space for improvement (a bit more content) | space for improvement (a bit more | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Very good for dummies in finance or pure techies. Can add a bit more content in IRR, ROI topics as we come across those quite often. Also these topics will help engineers with technical knowledge to understand the bigger picture of financial viability of the projects they handle. | techies. Can add a bit more | Content | in IRR, ROI topics as we | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Pretty hard to Keep track but the content was good. I probably need to be a bit more focussed next time. | hard to Keep track but the | Content | was good. I probably need to | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Good content for a short duration course. | Good | Content | for a short duration course. | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | It is a real good course with rich content for non-finance people. Good understanding and explanation of | a real good course with rich | Content | for non-finance people. Good understanding and | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | I really liked this course beacuse of the content and who is teaching. | liked this course beacuse of the | Content | and who is teaching. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Course is so clear to understand and content is fair enough to learn basics of finance. It won't make you finance guru but you will be able to learn essentials. Lecturer David Standen has ability to transfer his knowledge to audience, so the lessons are easy to understand and comprehensible. More graphics, more animations or more visual items can be added to lessons to boost comprehension. | is so clear to understand and | Content | is fair enough to learn basics | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | As a nonfinancial person, I liked that it is a good clear intro finance. However, I wished there was more reading content available on the site to go more into depth on the topics. | I wished there was more reading | Content | available on the site to go | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 0ayiYtaOEeWvEArBkQ8C9Q | Useful course for exposure to debates that animate the common law, with some bits about the relationship of English and European law, pre-Brexit. It's probably fair to say this course offers some experience in the elusive skill of how to think like a lawyer. The legal debates might seem a bit pedantic to all but the specialist. For example, the course attempts to sketch in the debates about proper use of precedent, with frequent reminders that the task of fully developing such debates is beyond the scope of the course--I'll bet some students were thinking, thank goodness it's beyond the scope. It's all clear enough, and delivered pretty much exclusively in traditional lecture format--there's even a lectern. Each of these lessons about the legal debates outlines and develops the opposing sides but doesn't give you a whole lot of new content to be tested. Thus, many of the quiz questions are on comprehending passages from cases, statutes, or commentary. Such quiz questions sometimes feel like those reading comprehension questions from a standardized test, rather than tests of the material covered in the lesson. | you a whole lot of new | Content | to be tested. Thus, many of | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 0ayiYtaOEeWvEArBkQ8C9Q | The contents look great. I just can't wait to begin this course. | The | Content | look great. I just can't wait | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 0EqoQy7_EeWPngoW78wA_Q | Captivating, with an intentional cadence of content and conversation. | Captivating, with an intentional cadence of | Content | and conversation. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 0EqoQy7_EeWPngoW78wA_Q | The content was very interesting and understandable. As someone who has a B.S. in Psychology, this is one part of Social psychology that I never learned about until now. | The | Content | was very interesting and understandable. As | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 0EqoQy7_EeWPngoW78wA_Q | Super interesting content and very well represented . Just perfect. Really. | Super interesting | Content | and very well represented . Just | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 0jVDw8z0EeSMfSIAC4tSZw | Great course for Teachers or those, like me, who want to gain general knowledge. I like the diversity of reading, video content and quizzes and the aspects of geology that were covered. | like the diversity of reading, video | Content | and quizzes and the aspects of | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 1b9VUDu6EeWdUgozVKt3nw | 1- Almost no content , all just general knowledge 2- the instructor was very hard to follow, his intonation is totally off and the sentences are broken so you can't connect the thoughts together. 3- There was no forum and thus no interaction. | 1- Almost no | Content | , all just general knowledge 2- | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1b9VUDu6EeWdUgozVKt3nw | This course means well, but with very little critical thinking required, it ultimately communicates good intentions over solid content. | ultimately communicates good intentions over solid | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 1b9VUDu6EeWdUgozVKt3nw | Actually, I am quite disappointed by this course. The language is so slow that it is terribly difficult to make sense of each sentence. The content barely scratches the surface and there is neither a forum, nor an exchange with other learners. I miss interactivity and I am glad that I decided to preview the course and not pay for it as it definitely is not worth the money. | make sense of each sentence. The | Content | barely scratches the surface and there | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| 1b9VUDu6EeWdUgozVKt3nw | I have always loved the Coursera courses that I have taken, but this one is dramatically below the standard. It is lacking in terms of content, pedagogy, and production. I truly hope that this isn't the direction that Coursera is headed in, as this class seems more like a cheap self-help seminar than an academic course of study. | It is lacking in terms of | Content | pedagogy, and production. I truly hope | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1b9VUDu6EeWdUgozVKt3nw | too easy, little content, can pass course easily without watching any of the videos | too easy, little | Content | can pass course easily without watching | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | Good content and exercise, very pedagogic. The only problem are the use of the program: If you don't know how to use a statistical program such as R, you will spend more time struggling with the program than understanding the topic. | Good | Content | and exercise, very pedagogic. The only | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | One thing I regret from this course is the content of the video lectures. Having watch the first week's videos, I found that the professor mostly just read the slides - and did it in a very faithful and careful manner, not to miss a subscript .... This is quite devastating for me. I can read the slides myself (although I have to download it first, since the fonts on the screen are very small). What I need is the professor to explain the logic behind the formulas, the *why* behind what is written, instead of just reading *what* is written on the slides. I find it amusing that with an expected learning of 8 hours a week, the total duration of the first week's videos add up to a mere 36 minutes. A couple of weeks ago I have just finished a course that subjectively is comparable in its difficulty level. That course is also rich in mathematical content and also requires a commitment of 4-8 hours per week. Each week, the duration of the lecture videos amount to somewhere between 120-150 minutes - and the lecturer didn't read slides; instead, he would explain the logic behind the concepts and provided papers for learners to read on our own time. That approach really helped scaffold my learning. I hope you'd consider revisiting this course's learning plan - or probably just state on the course info page that this course is more suitable for a refresher course rather than an introductory one. | regret from this course is the | Content | of the video lectures. Having watch | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | One thing I regret from this course is the content of the video lectures. Having watch the first week's videos, I found that the professor mostly just read the slides - and did it in a very faithful and careful manner, not to miss a subscript .... This is quite devastating for me. I can read the slides myself (although I have to download it first, since the fonts on the screen are very small). What I need is the professor to explain the logic behind the formulas, the *why* behind what is written, instead of just reading *what* is written on the slides. I find it amusing that with an expected learning of 8 hours a week, the total duration of the first week's videos add up to a mere 36 minutes. A couple of weeks ago I have just finished a course that subjectively is comparable in its difficulty level. That course is also rich in mathematical content and also requires a commitment of 4-8 hours per week. Each week, the duration of the lecture videos amount to somewhere between 120-150 minutes - and the lecturer didn't read slides; instead, he would explain the logic behind the concepts and provided papers for learners to read on our own time. That approach really helped scaffold my learning. I hope you'd consider revisiting this course's learning plan - or probably just state on the course info page that this course is more suitable for a refresher course rather than an introductory one. | course is also rich in mathematical | Content | and also requires a commitment of | Positive | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | solid content and dedicated teach staff! | solid | Content | and dedicated teach staff! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | I like the structure of the course that different professor is in charge of different chapter but the contents of each chapter are linked to the others. Each chapter offers different topic (of course) but the style and structure are the same. In detail, there are always theoretical and practical part as well as small quizzes in each chapter. In addition, the guideline and syllabus provide students with great details. On top of that, chapter assignments are provided with solution which are necessary for students to check their knowledge. I would love to participate in follow up course which might deal with more advanced topics after this basic one. | charge of different chapter but the | Content | of each chapter are linked to | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 1cjJ8SGJEeWa6hIFcmm3AQ | Excellent content , but weak language commanding with a strong accent | Excellent | Content | , but weak language commanding with | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 1cW_OysHEeWccAqzeA4VPw | The course content was very relevant and to the point. Especially the focus on interventions and strategies are easy to implement. | The course | Content | was very relevant and to the | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 1cz3WSsXEeWccAqzeA4VPw | The quality of content, as well as the style and approach of the instructor made this course a valuable learning experience. Assessments were tough, but helped review course material thoroughly. Overall, I would recommend this course to those who are inclined to learn about climate science. | The quality of | Content | as well as the style and | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 1eYewVu-EeWACQpGR_316w | The content is very good but the lecture presentation and structure could use improvement. Assignment instructions are not as clear as they could be. | The | Content | is very good but the lecture | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 1eYewVu-EeWACQpGR_316w | A BRILLIANT, BRILLIANT COURSE, the teachers put A LOT of effort into making the lecture slides and videos. Everything was explained multiple times such that the student understands it better. Also, computer vision, especially geometric vision is difficult to understand without a proper background in linear algebra, but the teachers' explanation was enough to fill the gaps so that even someone with only a minimalistic knowledge of linear algebra was able to consume the content. The exercises were a class apart, they were very well structured with tangible results at the end of each, And each of the exercises brought together the key points of the lectures, so that the student could easily implement them in code and test out the algorithm. Last but the not the least, the community was very active with the teaching assistants pitching in wherever necessary, in particular, Stephen did a great job of understanding the issues students were facing and taking appropriate action. All in All, a very well structured course to jump start one's career into computer vision. | algebra was able to consume the | Content | The exercises were a class apart, | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 1eYewVu-EeWACQpGR_316w | It is certainly the most comprehensive course in computer vision that can be provided in a span of four weeks. It is much time consuming compared to the other four courses (I have done this at the end); however, each and every bit of it is worth it. The teaching is incredible, especially, Prof. Shi's teaching includes intuition and physical interpretation which helps in appreciating the equations much more. The assignments equally match with the lecture content. Trust me, by the end of four weeks you will be comfortable in reading and understanding papers in visual SLAM, pose estimation, etc. A small suggestion: in a few lectures, for instance in SIFT lecture, Prof. Daniilidis is not shown in the screen whereas his actions are necessary to better understand the content in the slides. The Professors and the TAs have done a commendable job and thank you all for this course. | assignments equally match with the lecture | Content | Trust me, by the end of | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 1eYewVu-EeWACQpGR_316w | It is certainly the most comprehensive course in computer vision that can be provided in a span of four weeks. It is much time consuming compared to the other four courses (I have done this at the end); however, each and every bit of it is worth it. The teaching is incredible, especially, Prof. Shi's teaching includes intuition and physical interpretation which helps in appreciating the equations much more. The assignments equally match with the lecture content. Trust me, by the end of four weeks you will be comfortable in reading and understanding papers in visual SLAM, pose estimation, etc. A small suggestion: in a few lectures, for instance in SIFT lecture, Prof. Daniilidis is not shown in the screen whereas his actions are necessary to better understand the content in the slides. The Professors and the TAs have done a commendable job and thank you all for this course. | are necessary to better understand the | Content | in the slides. The Professors and | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 1eYewVu-EeWACQpGR_316w | As a standalone course - incredible. Lots of content, in detailed guides through maths. You seem to have been structural, but I still go lost every time. Overall impression is very chaotic. Maybe more summaries could help. Also separating videos into 'guide through maths' and ' guide through reasoning/theory/motivation' could help As a part of specialization: This course has more content than the previous 3 courses combined. This took me by surprise and it actually took me 3 months to finish this course. Maybe you could saparate some stuff to optional and required? | standalone course - incredible. Lots of | Content | in detailed guides through maths. You | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 1eYewVu-EeWACQpGR_316w | As a standalone course - incredible. Lots of content, in detailed guides through maths. You seem to have been structural, but I still go lost every time. Overall impression is very chaotic. Maybe more summaries could help. Also separating videos into 'guide through maths' and ' guide through reasoning/theory/motivation' could help As a part of specialization: This course has more content than the previous 3 courses combined. This took me by surprise and it actually took me 3 months to finish this course. Maybe you could saparate some stuff to optional and required? | of specialization: This course has more | Content | than the previous 3 courses combined. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 1eYewVu-EeWACQpGR_316w | The course is a very good overall description of the Perception field. The part I really liked is that there was no haste or a concept just superficially discussed - lectures are long and detailed. The presentation of lectures especially from Prof. Jianbo Shi are excellent - to represent Matrices in colours and give a intuitive sense of every formula(especially the Jacobians and treating the image blending process as painting) . The bad part of this course is that pronunciations of faculties could be a little unclear and hence a very good transcript is required - which in this course is not upto the mark. There were few mistakes on the slides and should be rectified atleast in the pdf of the slides. What this means is that we have to go through some frustration while watching the video first time which gradually improves on second or third view. Also, there is absolutely no participation of teaching staff. A good content should be supplemented with assistance to further enhance learning experience. Few doubts because of this remains unclear and I wish I could have got this sorted in this class. | participation of teaching staff. A good | Content | should be supplemented with assistance to | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Terrible course compared to all others I've seen on Coursera. Content is scarce, quality is low, maybe okay for college graduates, but being in business, it's just too slim. Video quality is also terrible. Don't waste 35$ | all others I've seen on Coursera. | Content | is scarce, quality is low, maybe | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good and very useful tips kept simple and easy to understand for everybody. However, personally I was looking for a more advanced content. | was looking for a more advanced | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | I expected more content. The course description says that there is material for 4-8 hours, however the videos are only one hour long. | I expected more | Content | The course description says that there | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Too basic and too easy but helpful content | basic and too easy but helpful | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Very valuable information. I wish that it was broken up differently, say, that there are six components to time management: planning, scheduling, estimating, adjusting, strategic reserve etc. And then these are different ways you can integrate them. The content is there, but I had to work out that structure myself. | ways you can integrate them. The | Content | is there, but I had to | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | This course would be much better if there was some actual substantive content. This course was not worth 35$. | if there was some actual substantive | Content | This course was not worth 35$. | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Most of the content was already known to me, and in my opinion it scratches at most the surface. also it only contains round about a 100 minutes which is not that much. | Most of the | Content | was already known to me, and | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | great content, easy to follow. good examples. hit the spot! | great | Content | easy to follow. good examples. hit | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Loved it. All content was new to me. Super useful. Best teacher ever. I reccommend it 100%! | Loved it. All | Content | was new to me. Super useful. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good in content. But, I suppose, the slides can be polished with some animations and figures. | Good in | Content | But, I suppose, the slides can | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | It has few content, should been more complete. | It has few | Content | should been more complete. | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | great content. learnt about strategic reserve times, and other practical tips. if only I could see my quiz results for free | great | Content | learnt about strategic reserve times, and | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | I liked the content and the way it was presented. However it was a shame that I was not able to get feedback on my test since I took the free course | I liked the | Content | and the way it was presented. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | A very very helpful course. It made me realizing where did I lag. Going to opt for Specialization as I am highly impressed by the content of this Course. | I am highly impressed by the | Content | of this Course. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Got some new ideas to try out. Good content | new ideas to try out. Good | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | This course helps me a lot in my life, however it takes discipline to apply its content on your daily life. Thank you very much for your effort, Coursera! | it takes discipline to apply its | Content | on your daily life. Thank you | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | It is too basic content, I can't imagine an specialization with material that basic. | It is too basic | Content | I can't imagine an specialization with | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Useful, but in a general sort of way. The instructor was well spoken and deliberate, but the content comes across as more "common-sense" material than anything. | well spoken and deliberate, but the | Content | comes across as more " common-sense" | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | I thoroughly enjoyed this course...the content was exceptional...well done to everyone involved | enjoyed this course. . . the | Content | was exceptional. . . well done | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | good and useful content but some problems in vids | good and useful | Content | but some problems in vids | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | I liked the content which Coursera provided in this course. Also the mentor was very impressive. Her voice and her way of delivering the lecture was amazing. The examples given in the course were very helping. | I liked the | Content | which Coursera provided in this course. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good course!!! Need more contents!!! | Good course! ! ! Need more | Content | ! ! | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | The teacher seems really nice and explains things really clearly, however the content of this course is not as helpful as I believed. It gave me a few new techniques to better administrate my time, but nothing that will revolutionize the way I work. | explains things really clearly, however the | Content | of this course is not as | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | I dont recommend this course to anyone. The course content is not up-to-the mark. | this course to anyone. The course | Content | is not up-to-the mark. | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | An excellent presentation with concise contents | An excellent presentation with concise | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good curse. The issue is that it was way way too short, and I felt its content is the equivalent of a week, and that more could be said about it. Again, otherwise, good course. | too short, and I felt its | Content | is the equivalent of a week, | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | This is more like a one hour lecture than an actual course. I was hoping for more content. | course. I was hoping for more | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | This course offers very useful tools and topics that would lead you to improve your time management and at the same time introduce you to a more productive work environment. It is a bit short and I think that it could go deeper on its content, offering other tools in time tracking and visualization. I definitely recommend this course. | it could go deeper on its | Content | offering other tools in time tracking | Negative | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good content, but not the best. Need to improve Vietnamese subtitles! | Good | Content | but not the best. Need to | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | It's a good course, very easy to understand and practical content | very easy to understand and practical | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 2bhGZFS-EeWKXg4Y7_tPaw | Have a lot of youtube content | Have a lot of youtube | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Really good content and the teacher is one of the best in Coursera. This is for many people a difficult subject that is made easy to digest. Looking forward to more courses from the same Teacher | Really good | Content | and the teacher is one of | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Very mixed feelings about this course. Generally speaking, the course lectures are informative and well organized. Mentors are reallly of great help, they are doing a great job, honestly: they are very active, they give good insights, they know the subject matter. But in the course lectures, there are occasions where concepts are used which were not formally introduced before their actual use. One example: in the lectures on probability, the first "slide" in the lecture talks about random processes, outcomes of random process,... On the next slide, the notion of probability of an event is introduced, but the very notion of "event" was never introduced. It is introduced in the accompanying book, but if it is the case that the book chapters should be read PRIOR to watching the course videos, that fact should be made clear. Further in the course on probability, some words are used "interchangeably" without the context making it clear why they can be used interchangeably. For instance, on some occasions, the concept of independent events is used, but then, later on, the discussion talks of independent processes. Which is which??? Is there a difference? If so, what is it? When do I need to use independent events as opposed to independent processes? The graded assignments are of varying quality. The most disturbing thing about them is that, on some occasions, concepts are used in the quiz questions (either directly in the questions and answer choices, or indirectly in the "correction" for the quiz after you have submitted it) that were never touched upon in the course. I have had two occasions of concepts not introduced in the course but used in the graded assignments. The first occurrence of a gap between course content and quiz questions was on a quiz question about inference. I failed the question, and understood why I failed based on the course content litterally minutes after failing the question (and one mentor actually rightly corrected me). But the question "correction" (the explanation text you receive after submitting, as justification for what the correct answer is) referred to the concept of "two-sided hypothesis test". Where did THAT come from?? I checked and rechecked the course videos, no mention at all of it. I checked the accompanying book, and the first mention of two-sided hypothesis test is way way way further in the book, in a chapter that is entirely focusing on inference. The second occurrence was in week 4. The course lectures cover two distributions: normal and binomial. The recommended reading in the book also focus on these two distributions (the recommended reading actually skips the section on geometric distribution, if I remember well). But in one of the quiz question, there was one of the possible answers referring to the geometric distribution. If it is the case that we are supposed to know and understand about geometric distributions, then the course content should cover the subject. Or at the very least, the course lecture should mention clearly that learners are advised to read about it in the accompanying book. The guidelines for the project assignment (week 5) are not all that clear as to what is expected from the learners. Sure, there are instructions on where to find the info, what structure should be followed,... There is also a very nice "example" project (designed by one of the mentors), which provides a lot of useful info (how to filter missing values from variables,...). But there is no real hint as to the depth of analysis we are expected to complete. This is definitely a source of confusion, not only for me, but also for a few other learners, from what I gathered in the discussion forums. The result is that the projects you get to review are of very disparate levels. Some end up in calculating one figure per research question, without any attempt at deriving trends or patterns, others do not include any plots at all,... The thing is that the peer review criteria do not really provide a good basis to ensure that learners did indeed assimilate the course contents. Most of the questions in the peer review assignment have a lot more to do with following a canvas and not so much with the course substance itself. For instance, some of the peer review criteria have to do with the narratives for computed statistics and plots. The criteria are: "Is each plot/R outout followed by a narrative", "Does the narrative correctly interpret the plots, or statistics", "Does the narrative address the research question". But when the research question is a question of the type "What it the IQR for income per state", for instance, the narrative can be very short: "IQR per state shows that the state with higher variability of income is...". So, the narrative meets the 3 evaluation criteria: there is a narrative, it does address the research question, and it does correctly interpret the statistics. But it is not particularly useful. I do understand that Internet-based peer review is challenging, and that you have to settle for "neutral" criteria that are easy to assess by learners. But the peer review grading "grid" as it currently stands is not "that" helpful in assessing whether the course contents has been assimilated. To conclude, when I took the course, my initial plan was to follow the entire specialization. But after having completed the first course of the specialization, I have radically changed my mind, and will look for alternatives "elsewhere" to get the knowledge/skillset that I am after. | occurrence of a gap between course | Content | and quiz questions was on a | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Very mixed feelings about this course. Generally speaking, the course lectures are informative and well organized. Mentors are reallly of great help, they are doing a great job, honestly: they are very active, they give good insights, they know the subject matter. But in the course lectures, there are occasions where concepts are used which were not formally introduced before their actual use. One example: in the lectures on probability, the first "slide" in the lecture talks about random processes, outcomes of random process,... On the next slide, the notion of probability of an event is introduced, but the very notion of "event" was never introduced. It is introduced in the accompanying book, but if it is the case that the book chapters should be read PRIOR to watching the course videos, that fact should be made clear. Further in the course on probability, some words are used "interchangeably" without the context making it clear why they can be used interchangeably. For instance, on some occasions, the concept of independent events is used, but then, later on, the discussion talks of independent processes. Which is which??? Is there a difference? If so, what is it? When do I need to use independent events as opposed to independent processes? The graded assignments are of varying quality. The most disturbing thing about them is that, on some occasions, concepts are used in the quiz questions (either directly in the questions and answer choices, or indirectly in the "correction" for the quiz after you have submitted it) that were never touched upon in the course. I have had two occasions of concepts not introduced in the course but used in the graded assignments. The first occurrence of a gap between course content and quiz questions was on a quiz question about inference. I failed the question, and understood why I failed based on the course content litterally minutes after failing the question (and one mentor actually rightly corrected me). But the question "correction" (the explanation text you receive after submitting, as justification for what the correct answer is) referred to the concept of "two-sided hypothesis test". Where did THAT come from?? I checked and rechecked the course videos, no mention at all of it. I checked the accompanying book, and the first mention of two-sided hypothesis test is way way way further in the book, in a chapter that is entirely focusing on inference. The second occurrence was in week 4. The course lectures cover two distributions: normal and binomial. The recommended reading in the book also focus on these two distributions (the recommended reading actually skips the section on geometric distribution, if I remember well). But in one of the quiz question, there was one of the possible answers referring to the geometric distribution. If it is the case that we are supposed to know and understand about geometric distributions, then the course content should cover the subject. Or at the very least, the course lecture should mention clearly that learners are advised to read about it in the accompanying book. The guidelines for the project assignment (week 5) are not all that clear as to what is expected from the learners. Sure, there are instructions on where to find the info, what structure should be followed,... There is also a very nice "example" project (designed by one of the mentors), which provides a lot of useful info (how to filter missing values from variables,...). But there is no real hint as to the depth of analysis we are expected to complete. This is definitely a source of confusion, not only for me, but also for a few other learners, from what I gathered in the discussion forums. The result is that the projects you get to review are of very disparate levels. Some end up in calculating one figure per research question, without any attempt at deriving trends or patterns, others do not include any plots at all,... The thing is that the peer review criteria do not really provide a good basis to ensure that learners did indeed assimilate the course contents. Most of the questions in the peer review assignment have a lot more to do with following a canvas and not so much with the course substance itself. For instance, some of the peer review criteria have to do with the narratives for computed statistics and plots. The criteria are: "Is each plot/R outout followed by a narrative", "Does the narrative correctly interpret the plots, or statistics", "Does the narrative address the research question". But when the research question is a question of the type "What it the IQR for income per state", for instance, the narrative can be very short: "IQR per state shows that the state with higher variability of income is...". So, the narrative meets the 3 evaluation criteria: there is a narrative, it does address the research question, and it does correctly interpret the statistics. But it is not particularly useful. I do understand that Internet-based peer review is challenging, and that you have to settle for "neutral" criteria that are easy to assess by learners. But the peer review grading "grid" as it currently stands is not "that" helpful in assessing whether the course contents has been assimilated. To conclude, when I took the course, my initial plan was to follow the entire specialization. But after having completed the first course of the specialization, I have radically changed my mind, and will look for alternatives "elsewhere" to get the knowledge/skillset that I am after. | I failed based on the course | Content | litterally minutes after failing the question | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Very mixed feelings about this course. Generally speaking, the course lectures are informative and well organized. Mentors are reallly of great help, they are doing a great job, honestly: they are very active, they give good insights, they know the subject matter. But in the course lectures, there are occasions where concepts are used which were not formally introduced before their actual use. One example: in the lectures on probability, the first "slide" in the lecture talks about random processes, outcomes of random process,... On the next slide, the notion of probability of an event is introduced, but the very notion of "event" was never introduced. It is introduced in the accompanying book, but if it is the case that the book chapters should be read PRIOR to watching the course videos, that fact should be made clear. Further in the course on probability, some words are used "interchangeably" without the context making it clear why they can be used interchangeably. For instance, on some occasions, the concept of independent events is used, but then, later on, the discussion talks of independent processes. Which is which??? Is there a difference? If so, what is it? When do I need to use independent events as opposed to independent processes? The graded assignments are of varying quality. The most disturbing thing about them is that, on some occasions, concepts are used in the quiz questions (either directly in the questions and answer choices, or indirectly in the "correction" for the quiz after you have submitted it) that were never touched upon in the course. I have had two occasions of concepts not introduced in the course but used in the graded assignments. The first occurrence of a gap between course content and quiz questions was on a quiz question about inference. I failed the question, and understood why I failed based on the course content litterally minutes after failing the question (and one mentor actually rightly corrected me). But the question "correction" (the explanation text you receive after submitting, as justification for what the correct answer is) referred to the concept of "two-sided hypothesis test". Where did THAT come from?? I checked and rechecked the course videos, no mention at all of it. I checked the accompanying book, and the first mention of two-sided hypothesis test is way way way further in the book, in a chapter that is entirely focusing on inference. The second occurrence was in week 4. The course lectures cover two distributions: normal and binomial. The recommended reading in the book also focus on these two distributions (the recommended reading actually skips the section on geometric distribution, if I remember well). But in one of the quiz question, there was one of the possible answers referring to the geometric distribution. If it is the case that we are supposed to know and understand about geometric distributions, then the course content should cover the subject. Or at the very least, the course lecture should mention clearly that learners are advised to read about it in the accompanying book. The guidelines for the project assignment (week 5) are not all that clear as to what is expected from the learners. Sure, there are instructions on where to find the info, what structure should be followed,... There is also a very nice "example" project (designed by one of the mentors), which provides a lot of useful info (how to filter missing values from variables,...). But there is no real hint as to the depth of analysis we are expected to complete. This is definitely a source of confusion, not only for me, but also for a few other learners, from what I gathered in the discussion forums. The result is that the projects you get to review are of very disparate levels. Some end up in calculating one figure per research question, without any attempt at deriving trends or patterns, others do not include any plots at all,... The thing is that the peer review criteria do not really provide a good basis to ensure that learners did indeed assimilate the course contents. Most of the questions in the peer review assignment have a lot more to do with following a canvas and not so much with the course substance itself. For instance, some of the peer review criteria have to do with the narratives for computed statistics and plots. The criteria are: "Is each plot/R outout followed by a narrative", "Does the narrative correctly interpret the plots, or statistics", "Does the narrative address the research question". But when the research question is a question of the type "What it the IQR for income per state", for instance, the narrative can be very short: "IQR per state shows that the state with higher variability of income is...". So, the narrative meets the 3 evaluation criteria: there is a narrative, it does address the research question, and it does correctly interpret the statistics. But it is not particularly useful. I do understand that Internet-based peer review is challenging, and that you have to settle for "neutral" criteria that are easy to assess by learners. But the peer review grading "grid" as it currently stands is not "that" helpful in assessing whether the course contents has been assimilated. To conclude, when I took the course, my initial plan was to follow the entire specialization. But after having completed the first course of the specialization, I have radically changed my mind, and will look for alternatives "elsewhere" to get the knowledge/skillset that I am after. | about geometric distributions, then the course | Content | should cover the subject. Or at | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Very mixed feelings about this course. Generally speaking, the course lectures are informative and well organized. Mentors are reallly of great help, they are doing a great job, honestly: they are very active, they give good insights, they know the subject matter. But in the course lectures, there are occasions where concepts are used which were not formally introduced before their actual use. One example: in the lectures on probability, the first "slide" in the lecture talks about random processes, outcomes of random process,... On the next slide, the notion of probability of an event is introduced, but the very notion of "event" was never introduced. It is introduced in the accompanying book, but if it is the case that the book chapters should be read PRIOR to watching the course videos, that fact should be made clear. Further in the course on probability, some words are used "interchangeably" without the context making it clear why they can be used interchangeably. For instance, on some occasions, the concept of independent events is used, but then, later on, the discussion talks of independent processes. Which is which??? Is there a difference? If so, what is it? When do I need to use independent events as opposed to independent processes? The graded assignments are of varying quality. The most disturbing thing about them is that, on some occasions, concepts are used in the quiz questions (either directly in the questions and answer choices, or indirectly in the "correction" for the quiz after you have submitted it) that were never touched upon in the course. I have had two occasions of concepts not introduced in the course but used in the graded assignments. The first occurrence of a gap between course content and quiz questions was on a quiz question about inference. I failed the question, and understood why I failed based on the course content litterally minutes after failing the question (and one mentor actually rightly corrected me). But the question "correction" (the explanation text you receive after submitting, as justification for what the correct answer is) referred to the concept of "two-sided hypothesis test". Where did THAT come from?? I checked and rechecked the course videos, no mention at all of it. I checked the accompanying book, and the first mention of two-sided hypothesis test is way way way further in the book, in a chapter that is entirely focusing on inference. The second occurrence was in week 4. The course lectures cover two distributions: normal and binomial. The recommended reading in the book also focus on these two distributions (the recommended reading actually skips the section on geometric distribution, if I remember well). But in one of the quiz question, there was one of the possible answers referring to the geometric distribution. If it is the case that we are supposed to know and understand about geometric distributions, then the course content should cover the subject. Or at the very least, the course lecture should mention clearly that learners are advised to read about it in the accompanying book. The guidelines for the project assignment (week 5) are not all that clear as to what is expected from the learners. Sure, there are instructions on where to find the info, what structure should be followed,... There is also a very nice "example" project (designed by one of the mentors), which provides a lot of useful info (how to filter missing values from variables,...). But there is no real hint as to the depth of analysis we are expected to complete. This is definitely a source of confusion, not only for me, but also for a few other learners, from what I gathered in the discussion forums. The result is that the projects you get to review are of very disparate levels. Some end up in calculating one figure per research question, without any attempt at deriving trends or patterns, others do not include any plots at all,... The thing is that the peer review criteria do not really provide a good basis to ensure that learners did indeed assimilate the course contents. Most of the questions in the peer review assignment have a lot more to do with following a canvas and not so much with the course substance itself. For instance, some of the peer review criteria have to do with the narratives for computed statistics and plots. The criteria are: "Is each plot/R outout followed by a narrative", "Does the narrative correctly interpret the plots, or statistics", "Does the narrative address the research question". But when the research question is a question of the type "What it the IQR for income per state", for instance, the narrative can be very short: "IQR per state shows that the state with higher variability of income is...". So, the narrative meets the 3 evaluation criteria: there is a narrative, it does address the research question, and it does correctly interpret the statistics. But it is not particularly useful. I do understand that Internet-based peer review is challenging, and that you have to settle for "neutral" criteria that are easy to assess by learners. But the peer review grading "grid" as it currently stands is not "that" helpful in assessing whether the course contents has been assimilated. To conclude, when I took the course, my initial plan was to follow the entire specialization. But after having completed the first course of the specialization, I have radically changed my mind, and will look for alternatives "elsewhere" to get the knowledge/skillset that I am after. | learners did indeed assimilate the course | Content | Most of the questions in the | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Very mixed feelings about this course. Generally speaking, the course lectures are informative and well organized. Mentors are reallly of great help, they are doing a great job, honestly: they are very active, they give good insights, they know the subject matter. But in the course lectures, there are occasions where concepts are used which were not formally introduced before their actual use. One example: in the lectures on probability, the first "slide" in the lecture talks about random processes, outcomes of random process,... On the next slide, the notion of probability of an event is introduced, but the very notion of "event" was never introduced. It is introduced in the accompanying book, but if it is the case that the book chapters should be read PRIOR to watching the course videos, that fact should be made clear. Further in the course on probability, some words are used "interchangeably" without the context making it clear why they can be used interchangeably. For instance, on some occasions, the concept of independent events is used, but then, later on, the discussion talks of independent processes. Which is which??? Is there a difference? If so, what is it? When do I need to use independent events as opposed to independent processes? The graded assignments are of varying quality. The most disturbing thing about them is that, on some occasions, concepts are used in the quiz questions (either directly in the questions and answer choices, or indirectly in the "correction" for the quiz after you have submitted it) that were never touched upon in the course. I have had two occasions of concepts not introduced in the course but used in the graded assignments. The first occurrence of a gap between course content and quiz questions was on a quiz question about inference. I failed the question, and understood why I failed based on the course content litterally minutes after failing the question (and one mentor actually rightly corrected me). But the question "correction" (the explanation text you receive after submitting, as justification for what the correct answer is) referred to the concept of "two-sided hypothesis test". Where did THAT come from?? I checked and rechecked the course videos, no mention at all of it. I checked the accompanying book, and the first mention of two-sided hypothesis test is way way way further in the book, in a chapter that is entirely focusing on inference. The second occurrence was in week 4. The course lectures cover two distributions: normal and binomial. The recommended reading in the book also focus on these two distributions (the recommended reading actually skips the section on geometric distribution, if I remember well). But in one of the quiz question, there was one of the possible answers referring to the geometric distribution. If it is the case that we are supposed to know and understand about geometric distributions, then the course content should cover the subject. Or at the very least, the course lecture should mention clearly that learners are advised to read about it in the accompanying book. The guidelines for the project assignment (week 5) are not all that clear as to what is expected from the learners. Sure, there are instructions on where to find the info, what structure should be followed,... There is also a very nice "example" project (designed by one of the mentors), which provides a lot of useful info (how to filter missing values from variables,...). But there is no real hint as to the depth of analysis we are expected to complete. This is definitely a source of confusion, not only for me, but also for a few other learners, from what I gathered in the discussion forums. The result is that the projects you get to review are of very disparate levels. Some end up in calculating one figure per research question, without any attempt at deriving trends or patterns, others do not include any plots at all,... The thing is that the peer review criteria do not really provide a good basis to ensure that learners did indeed assimilate the course contents. Most of the questions in the peer review assignment have a lot more to do with following a canvas and not so much with the course substance itself. For instance, some of the peer review criteria have to do with the narratives for computed statistics and plots. The criteria are: "Is each plot/R outout followed by a narrative", "Does the narrative correctly interpret the plots, or statistics", "Does the narrative address the research question". But when the research question is a question of the type "What it the IQR for income per state", for instance, the narrative can be very short: "IQR per state shows that the state with higher variability of income is...". So, the narrative meets the 3 evaluation criteria: there is a narrative, it does address the research question, and it does correctly interpret the statistics. But it is not particularly useful. I do understand that Internet-based peer review is challenging, and that you have to settle for "neutral" criteria that are easy to assess by learners. But the peer review grading "grid" as it currently stands is not "that" helpful in assessing whether the course contents has been assimilated. To conclude, when I took the course, my initial plan was to follow the entire specialization. But after having completed the first course of the specialization, I have radically changed my mind, and will look for alternatives "elsewhere" to get the knowledge/skillset that I am after. | helpful in assessing whether the course | Content | has been assimilated. To conclude, when | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Solid and efficient introduction to content, does not do enough teaching in R for the final project - which is *fine* because finding things out for yourself is the best way to learn, but R help online is often so dense that it's not that helpful to a beginner. More responsive mentors - especially nearer the end of the course - would be really helpful. | Solid and efficient introduction to | Content | does not do enough teaching in | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | I really liked this course. The course comprises of lectures, which are clear and are rich in examples, and of practical assignments, which you do in R. The practical tasks is where the course shines - everything is explained very clearly, there is a lot of content, and the course works with databases that are huge (thousands of cases and hundreds of variables) and have some of the more common problems (eg. missing data). I have little to no prior programming experience, just for the record. Mind you, this is an introductory course, as the name states, so don't expect to be a master of R or data handling after finishing it, but I feel I learned a lot here. | clearly, there is a lot of | Content | and the course works with databases | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | This course is definitly suitable for learners who don't have any related background. Dr. Mine Cetinkaya-Rundel has an amiable speaking style and always highlighted the key points in teaching videos, which helped me understand other contents in the textbook. Besides, the time and assignment arrangement of this course are also very reasonable. The only thing I could complain about is a system bug of the Amazon AWS and the grading system. My final project file went blank after the system told me the file uploading is sucessfully completed on August 3, and I got three 0 point from three peers since they only saw a blank file, of which I had no idea, and all I could see is "Grading in progress" on the system. Until the final grading day is over, which is August 12, the system finally reminded me of this horrible thing. I came to mentors, disscussion forum as well as the help center, reuploaded my file, desperately tried to find peers who can still spare some time to review my file, and it is finally fixed today. I got my certificate in the end, but the grading process is really frustrating. Hope this bug won't happen to anyone ever ag | videos, which helped me understand other | Content | in the textbook. Besides, the time | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | While the final project was a little unclear in terms of its parameters and there were several small file problems, this was overall a very well constructed course, especially in terms of its content before the final project. | course, especially in terms of its | Content | before the final project. | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | One of the well made MOOCs. There are many courses in Coursera taught by good professors from good universities but are badly designed for an MOOC environment making it a bad experience. This course is really well designed. The contents is modular and lectures are split into easy to grasp chunks. The weekly lab exercises using R using real datasets is a plus. Though not much of R syntax is taught and it is up to us to explore(understandable since the goal of this course is not to teach R). The final project was a bit challenging but fun. The course 'mentors' are helpful. | course is really well designed. The | Content | is modular and lectures are split | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Excellent content - Also greatly helped improve my R programming skills | Excellent | Content | - Also greatly helped improve my | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | The content of this course is not terribly difficult, I thought, but it's a very good introduction into most aspects of Data Science. You learn to familiarize yourself with R quite well and get a lot of independence to create a final project based on a huge data set. One thing I would've liked is a sample completed project, start to finish, to see what was expected- the things that got produced (which you peer review) varied hugely in quality. | The | Content | of this course is not terribly | Negative | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Great course - content and presentation are awesome! I am a digital marketer with nearly 8 years of experience. I am looking forward to develop my analytics skills which will help me to deep dive further in to consumer data and I think this course is just what I needed. Really helpful! | Great course - | Content | and presentation are awesome! I am | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | This course was excellent, the teaching material top-notch and with excellent pedagogy. It's amazing that the course authors offer a statistics textbook almost exactly covering the course content for free. The idea to combine R and statistics is right on the money too, thanks to this one can learn 2 skills at the same time, with statistical analysis letting you practice coding in R and R helping you visualise your statistics. The lectures are divided into small, easy to absorb chunks and the teacher does an excellent job explaining the material, giving very good examples and analogies to help the students understand concepts. The exercises and assignments are fun to complete, and the course offers a flexibility in how much time you spend on it per week, e.g. there are non-mandatory exercises to do. | textbook almost exactly covering the course | Content | for free. The idea to combine | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Very informational, really good speed and content. Nice examples to illustrate the learnings. | Very informational, really good speed and | Content | Nice examples to illustrate the learnings. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | The content is very well structured, the explanations are clear and full of useful examples. Some concepts were a bit difficult to grasp and required reviewing outside the material of the course. In general, excellent. | The | Content | is very well structured, the explanations | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 2g7bdO-KEeWTgg7cwVeSqQ | Enjoyed this course thoroughly. Very good instructor, good content, well-designed. | course thoroughly. Very good instructor, good | Content | well-designed. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | A great course of beginers in game development. The content is clear and concise. Brian has a good command over the topics. | of beginers in game development. The | Content | is clear and concise. Brian has | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | I totally enjoyed the course. Very well structured and organized. Contents are clear and relevant. I learned a lot. Great opportunity for beginners! | course. Very well structured and organized. | Content | are clear and relevant. I learned | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Excelent intro. Dynamic and interactive content in all four weeks | Excelent intro. Dynamic and interactive | Content | in all four weeks | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Great lecturer, easy to understanding and extra content to explore more of the course. Give it a 5 star! | lecturer, easy to understanding and extra | Content | to explore more of the course. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Brian Winn is an astoundingly good teacher, and has leveraged a huge amount of professional knowledge to pour his heart into what is arguably the best $400 I've ever spent in my life. This teaching/learning format is inordinately effective, and I'm 100% looking forward to course 2, 3, 4, and the capstone. Thank you for going above and beyond in creating a truly fantastic learning environment, syllabus, and a plethora of wonderful content. | syllabus, and a plethora of wonderful | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Very basic introduction. Though it covers all the needed information it lacks of interesting content. | needed information it lacks of interesting | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Great course for introduce. Review the content of the four week. | Great course for introduce. Review the | Content | of the four week. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Good course with both theoretical and practical content. It lacks instructor and staff support. | course with both theoretical and practical | Content | It lacks instructor and staff support. | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | A nice introduction to Game Development. The content is great and it doesn't overextend to the point of scaring you off game dev. I would give this course 5 stars if it had a little more spice. Everything in the course felt too scripted. I would suggest doing some fun live sessions on the side or something to let us know we're not being taught by robots. | nice introduction to Game Development. The | Content | is great and it doesn't overextend | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Great course!!! A lot of contents, but really well explained. You can feel that you are learining as you follow the lessons. Does not require any previous knowledge, but gives you a reallt good insight of what would it be to become a game developer. I totally recommend it. | course! ! ! A lot of | Content | but really well explained. You can | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | The content of this course is well explain and easy to follow, I have a lot of fun doing the assignments, it was sort of playing. | The | Content | of this course is well explain | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Excellent video content and quality, engaging assignments and helpful resources. | Excellent video | Content | and quality, engaging assignments and helpful | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Love the projects and classes!, but i was expecting more interaction with the teacher due that we found some bugs in the content , we were able to solved using the forum, but i was expecting that the teacher step up | we found some bugs in the | Content | , we were able to solved | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Interesting and useful course, easy to follow and full of contents | easy to follow and full of | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Good course, I learned a lot about Unity. However, I feel that it does not promote investigation by ourselves. Basically, the videos are the steps we need to do to complete one half of the assignment, and the other half is just about repeating those steps we were shown. Also, I expected a bit more depth in the scripts week, but I understand it's hard to add a lot of content for just a week. The course is still good, but maybe too easy. | hard to add a lot of | Content | for just a week. The course | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | This course is very good at explaining both how and why you would do things a certain way in Unity, something that is missing from most of the tutorials you can find out on the Internet. The professor explains concepts behind why you need to use certain components instead of just giving a list of things to match up to replicate the projects. I've rated it 4 out of 5 stars not based on the content, but because the response time, interaction, and feedback could be improved upon. The content is definitely 5 of 5. I took this during the first run of the course, so I'm sure that the course staff will improve on this in the future once they get a bit more used to running a MOOC on Coursera. | 5 stars not based on the | Content | but because the response time, interaction, | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | This course is very good at explaining both how and why you would do things a certain way in Unity, something that is missing from most of the tutorials you can find out on the Internet. The professor explains concepts behind why you need to use certain components instead of just giving a list of things to match up to replicate the projects. I've rated it 4 out of 5 stars not based on the content, but because the response time, interaction, and feedback could be improved upon. The content is definitely 5 of 5. I took this during the first run of the course, so I'm sure that the course staff will improve on this in the future once they get a bit more used to running a MOOC on Coursera. | feedback could be improved upon. The | Content | is definitely 5 of 5. I | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | I had a lot of fun learning with Dr SEVERANCE, the content of the course effectively covers the three topics of History, Technology and Security, is nicely organized, and very accessible for someone without a scientific background. | fun learning with Dr SEVERANCE, the | Content | of the course effectively covers the | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | I am an English language professor. I took this course for "fun"--my BA minor was in history and I am a curious person. I love this course and Dr. Chuck! The way he explains things is "IN ENGLISH!!" I mean that the way he explains things makes sense to a non-literate IT person. In addition, the content is both interesting and informative. The structure of the course is easy to follow. I have taken a few courses where I was not sure what I was supposed to do next, but not in this course. Frankly, I prefer a course where I take quizzes. Projects can be educational and interesting and sometimes necessary to the course content, but I am working 40 to 60 hours a week and don't always have time for courses with projects--and those are the courses I have not completed. I liked just taking quizzes about the content. So far, this has been the best course I have taken in Coursera. And I have already signed up for a second course with Dr. Chuck and the University of Michigan. | non-literate IT person. In addition, the | Content | is both interesting and informative. The | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | I am an English language professor. I took this course for "fun"--my BA minor was in history and I am a curious person. I love this course and Dr. Chuck! The way he explains things is "IN ENGLISH!!" I mean that the way he explains things makes sense to a non-literate IT person. In addition, the content is both interesting and informative. The structure of the course is easy to follow. I have taken a few courses where I was not sure what I was supposed to do next, but not in this course. Frankly, I prefer a course where I take quizzes. Projects can be educational and interesting and sometimes necessary to the course content, but I am working 40 to 60 hours a week and don't always have time for courses with projects--and those are the courses I have not completed. I liked just taking quizzes about the content. So far, this has been the best course I have taken in Coursera. And I have already signed up for a second course with Dr. Chuck and the University of Michigan. | and sometimes necessary to the course | Content | but I am working 40 to | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | I am an English language professor. I took this course for "fun"--my BA minor was in history and I am a curious person. I love this course and Dr. Chuck! The way he explains things is "IN ENGLISH!!" I mean that the way he explains things makes sense to a non-literate IT person. In addition, the content is both interesting and informative. The structure of the course is easy to follow. I have taken a few courses where I was not sure what I was supposed to do next, but not in this course. Frankly, I prefer a course where I take quizzes. Projects can be educational and interesting and sometimes necessary to the course content, but I am working 40 to 60 hours a week and don't always have time for courses with projects--and those are the courses I have not completed. I liked just taking quizzes about the content. So far, this has been the best course I have taken in Coursera. And I have already signed up for a second course with Dr. Chuck and the University of Michigan. | liked just taking quizzes about the | Content | So far, this has been the | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Additionally to the very interesting and useful content proposed in this course, I have found it very much enjoyable and pleasant thanks to the talent of Dr. Chuck. Thanks a lot Dr. Chuck you are really a wonderful person and I hope to meet you in person one day. | to the very interesting and useful | Content | proposed in this course, I have | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | This course is a must for anyone who wants to understand the fundamentals of how the internet works. The content, videos, and the teachings of Dr. Charles severance are just great, very precise and to the point with real life examples and interviews. It has been much more than what I had imagined and expected. Thanks very much Dr. Charles Severance and Coursera for a great course. | of how the internet works. The | Content | videos, and the teachings of Dr. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Great content and well paced lectures | Great | Content | and well paced lectures | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Perhaps it's just that I'm not a part of the target audience of this course, but I am deeply dissatisfied with it. Aside from a couple of rare interviews and old video records [which admittedly were very interesting, though too few], I found nothing of value that cannot be learned by reading Wikipedia or other easily accessible sources. The course is pretty light on technical details and there could [and perhaps should] have been much more beyond-the-scenes content, as well as references to specific documents and events in order to justify this course's existence. In other words, if you are a techie and are indeed interested in this topic, chances are that you already know most of the material taught. | should] have been much more beyond-the-scenes | Content | as well as references to specific | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Great content, structure, depth, course leader. All in all a brilliant course. | Great | Content | structure, depth, course leader. All in | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Excellent course! This with content brought by the tech Giants themselves. All of which is clearly explained and elaborated upon by Dr. Chuck. Ever wondered who invented JavaScript? How and why? You'll find out here and many more. This all brought in the right flexible and mobile format for me | Excellent course! This with | Content | brought by the tech Giants themselves. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | nice content | nice | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Video quality is poor. The content is quite interesting, but while navigating, the quality of the video disturbs me. It would be better, if you can upgrade this. | Video quality is poor. The | Content | is quite interesting, but while navigating, | Negative | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Very interesting content, good level of difficulty each week, and very entertaining teacher! | Very interesting | Content | good level of difficulty each week, | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Very good content, explains in a simple way technical things, making far easier to understand everything, it's also fun because it shows the history from the eyes of people that actually made it happen. | Very good | Content | explains in a simple way technical | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Really interesting material on the inner workings of the internet and how it came about. Would recommend it to anyone with an interest in computers and networking. Content is very engaging and pitched at a level that even a non computer scientist like myself finds it e | an interest in computers and networking. | Content | is very engaging and pitched at | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | This is a great opportunity to learn more about the history of the internet and how it was developed throughout the years. You will also be delighted to watch the videos about the Internet featuring so many bright people. "Internet History, Technology, and Security" is not a course that will teach you only the theorical content, it will give you a whole new view about how things came to be and motivate you even more. | will teach you only the theorical | Content | it will give you a whole | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | great content | great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 33tTdzylEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Professor Franz Wohlgezogen delivers this course with excellence and precision, as well as making it interesting and interactive. He is an engaging and charismatic teacher and seems to be able to cater to several learning styles. The content, delivery and layout of materials is such that the student is well supported through to success. I highly recommend. | cater to several learning styles. The | Content | delivery and layout of materials is | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 33tTdzylEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Great Course with high uality content | Great Course with high uality | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 33tTdzylEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | one of the most boring courses I have ever taken.....I had to force myself to finish it. the teacher is charismatic but the content is just theories and abstract ideas.....just blah blah blah | the teacher is charismatic but the | Content | is just theories and abstract ideas. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 33tTdzylEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | I'm enjoying the course, Franz is a great communicator! But the lessons could be shorter and more objective, some of the the content is too academic/theoretical, and perhaps not so helpful in the real world. | more objective, some of the the | Content | is too academic/theoretical, and perhaps not | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 33tTdzylEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | The content drags and can be boring | The | Content | drags and can be boring | Negative | 0.9 | 3.0 |
| 33tTdzylEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Excellent content that can be used daily in an international organization. The course allowed me to improve my negotiation skills and manage different points of view using the technical concepts offered by the International Leadership and Organizational Behavior class. | Excellent | Content | that can be used daily in | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Great content but a little too slow in my opinion, still great input about management. | Great | Content | but a little too slow in | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Very Good Content | Very Good | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Excellent content, but the instructor does not motivate | Excellent | Content | but the instructor does not motivate | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Great course. Precise and clear content | Great course. Precise and clear | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | It was a nice course. It has a nice content and powerful tips. | nice course. It has a nice | Content | and powerful tips. | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Nice content but a few bugs with the videos and sound track when watching online. | Nice | Content | but a few bugs with the | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | 4/5 for content, 2/5 for presentation. Compared to other courses, the lecturer is slow and often reads from slides. Nevertheless thanks for the course. | 4/5 for | Content | 2/5 for presentation. Compared to other | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Mr. Nagy presents an introduction to fundamentals of management that can be used by experience managers as a refresher. He presents the contents in a clear and concise manner, with useful examples that help retain the concepts he is presenting. I highly recommend this course to anybody, whether he or she is just entering the workforce after College or people that is already involved in management. | as a refresher. He presents the | Content | in a clear and concise manner, | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | A Very Good overview of the "Fundamentals". One feels like they have all the information they need to start managing after completion. The Questions are fairly simple but the Content is Meaningful. Overall, I got a lot out of it, it's an enjoyable introduction to management. | Questions are fairly simple but the | Content | is Meaningful. Overall, I got a | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Excellent course content, flow and example sharing by Mr. Dave Nagy. Thanks UCI for providing such a wonderful course. Thanks!!! | Excellent course | Content | flow and example sharing by Mr. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Wonderful Content and well explained | Wonderful | Content | and well explained | Positive | 0.9 | 4.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Excellent - full of high-quality content. | Excellent - full of high-quality | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Need more content for SVM and Random Forest | Need more | Content | for SVM and Random Forest | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | AWESOME COURSE!! Carlos and Emily are incredible teachers and the course contents are truly informative and well-paced for beginners. | are incredible teachers and the course | Content | are truly informative and well-paced for | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | First. I like these courses allot. They are pretty close to covering just what you need to actually do machine learning in the real world and not dive too deep into topics that have no practical value. However: This course was a bit too thin, the last 4 weeks of the course contained little in depth informations and seemed to brush over allot of different topics that could have contained more information. Although they where important topics the course could go more in depth on at least 3 or 4 of those topics. The last 3 weeks could have been a course on its own if properly explored. However the concepts are well enough covered to be usable in practice i belive. The programming exercises where ridiculously simple. Everything was reduced to filling in 1 or two lines in a bigger function. I understand that the point was to see how these functions are made and that it increases our understanding of the algorithms already existing in packages like schikit-learn and graphlab. Also the content became a bit too repetetive (actually started in the second course but continues in this course). The time used on variation over the same topic in different models made it challenging to pay attention when the lecture finally came to a new point (brain fell a sleep while waiting for something new). | like schikit-learn and graphlab. Also the | Content | became a bit too repetetive (actually | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | The contents are really clear and professors are great! | The | Content | are really clear and professors are | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | The course content seemed to be rushed out, as a result, the quality is not as good as the first two. | The course | Content | seemed to be rushed out, as | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | The course is interesting and well taught. The professor is very enthusiastic and it makes the course fun to watch. The problem in my opinion is that the content is too superficial. It's completely lack of mathematical background and the programming exercises are sometimes no more than copy paste. | in my opinion is that the | Content | is too superficial. It's completely lack | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | This series is taught by Emily and Carlos. Course 2 was Emily and this course 3 is Carlos. Carlos takes a more practical approach by showing how things are related using pictures, trial and error, what happens when we do this vs. that. Emily on the other hand dives down into the math and actual facts. I feel Emily is more difficult overall - but once I got through it, I had a better foundation and intuition as to how things work and better overall understanding. So - giving this class 4 stars as compared to Emily's class that is 5 stars. I feel if they would mix it with Emily doing the math immediately followed by Carlos explanations it would be best. Finally - I don't feel this course on classification had as much content. We could've done more. | course on classification had as much | Content | We could've done more. | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Very good content, very well explained... great course. Classification its a very broad topic but i think this is great introduction. The hands on where kinda on the easy side... but very interesting. | Very good | Content | very well explained. . . great | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | The content seems rather thinner than that of earlier courses in the specialization, and seems to get more so as the course progresses. (Week 6 is entirely spent on Precision and Recall, with only about 30 min of lecture.) It feels like there was a rush to get the course out and that corners may have been cut at the end. And as others have mentioned, several very important classification topics are conspicuously missing. | The | Content | seems rather thinner than that of | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | The contents are very interesting and well explained. Nevertheless, unlike the Regression module, the current one suffers of some technical problem, like slides not well formatted, noisy audio in some video, weekly work load not perfectly calibrated. Despite all this, if you are interested in the subject, you will definitely love this course!!! | The | Content | are very interesting and well explained. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Take you too long to come back, but the content is great. Good job | long to come back, but the | Content | is great. Good job | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 3cmY9AVPEeWr2CIAC20DIw | This is a fabulous course. I think anyone interested in giving and philanthropy should take this course, to better understand the concept of effectiveness. I took this course to identify my own role for giving, and the content and interviews helped me to shape my vision within my modest income. Hurrah for Peter Singer and Princeton offering this course to the world! | own role for giving, and the | Content | and interviews helped me to shape | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 3e249OIsEeSdRSIAC3-Q-A | Very bad audio and video. Couldn't understand most of the content. | video. Couldn't understand most of the | Content | | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| 3e249OIsEeSdRSIAC3-Q-A | Hated the course and the content. I truly regret investing my money on this course. | Hated the course and the | Content | I truly regret investing my money | Negative | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 3e249OIsEeSdRSIAC3-Q-A | Capstone exercises were very ambiguous, the students were left to interpret they way they had to finish and how they rated their peers. The peer reviews were poor with little to no feedback and the focus was on how the material was laid out vs what the content was. I have done other coursers and capstones in Coursera this was one of the poorest. UIUC has to revamp this. More guidance to students in the instructions would be the first step. | was laid out vs what the | Content | was. I have done other coursers | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| 3e249OIsEeSdRSIAC3-Q-A | Great course with excellent content | Great course with excellent | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 3EPZVpSGEeSb9SIACzCJlg | Perfection, both in content and execution! | Perfection, both in | Content | and execution! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 3EPZVpSGEeSb9SIACzCJlg | This is one of the best music courses in Coursera. Jonathan Biss is not only one of the great players of our time, but also manages to simplify and deliver outstanding quality content for learners in any theroetical | to simplify and deliver outstanding quality | Content | for learners in any theroetical | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Very useful contents, I have learned a lot of Korean vocabularies and expressions from this course. Thank you very much professor Kang, and thanks for the platform that Yonsei University and Coursera has offered | Very useful | Content | I have learned a lot of | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Clear lectures and notes to reenforce the content! One of the best courses on here | lectures and notes to reenforce the | Content | One of the best courses on | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Amazing weeks with FSK, I've learned a lot. The contents are very useful, thankyou :) | FSK, I've learned a lot. The | Content | are very useful, thankyou :) | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | This really is a great course, it has a lot of content to learn, is concise, easy, and practical. Also the staff does his best at explaining doubts and questions. If you like Korean, or want to start learning Korean this is a must. | course, it has a lot of | Content | to learn, is concise, easy, and | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | The content is interesting, but not rich enough for a course. I finished all the videos and assignments in only 2 days. | The | Content | is interesting, but not rich enough | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Great course. I just audited it but even the audit content was very helpful. You'll have to pay for peer review, but I just wanted to learn about plot and this course delivered. :) | audited it but even the audit | Content | was very helpful. You'll have to | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | fabulous course with lot of do's and don'ts... and an inspirational guide and techniques for a startup writer or a beginer. course with its full content , quality and knowledge . | a beginer. course with its full | Content | , quality and knowledge . | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Besides an engaging instructor (Brandon Skyhorse), the modules' content is accessible for nascent writers. Moreover, I enjoy the shop talk series with authors. These lectures cum interviews show a fulfilling, intimate view of writing lives. I feel more confident in my writing and have been a better, more critical reader of others' work, especially my own. I recommend this course to anyone who needs to brush up on their creative writing skills and for those who want to start from a clean slate. | engaging instructor (Brandon Skyhorse), the modules' | Content | is accessible for nascent writers. Moreover, | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Very well lead, clear explanations and great content. I found this course both useful and delivering to my expectations. | well lead, clear explanations and great | Content | I found this course both useful | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | While this course was interesting, it seemed very light. There was only about 10 or so minutes of 'content' a week, plus some interviews (which were very interesting, but didn't feel as though they taught too much). The assignments were all good except for the third one about the physical object. It was a weird prompt and not in a good way. I would recommend this course, but I'd also love to see it expanded a bit. | about 10 or so minutes of | Content | a week, plus some interviews (which | Negative | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | The content of the course is very useful and delivered in a structured and effective way. I enjoyed the writing assignments and feedback opportunities. My only complaint is that there are a great number of people auditing the course and we had to create our own google community to share and get feedback as the assignments and feedback sections of the course are locked for all of the non-paying students. Other than that is was very enjoyable and informative. | The | Content | of the course is very useful | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 3mA6QTIyEeWsOA5fzAmxbw | Content is too easy | | Content | is too easy | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| 3mA6QTIyEeWsOA5fzAmxbw | Very nice assignments and content. You learn a lot when you complete all assignments. | Very nice assignments and | Content | You learn a lot when you | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 3oV7d6_HEeS5PyIAC4GQ5A | Excellent Course. Really enjoyed the content and the teachers style in delivery. | Excellent Course. Really enjoyed the | Content | and the teachers style in delivery. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 3TdKKA-VEeWhsgqB1eduww | Had fun with this course. Precise, concise & the content is cutting edge & juicy! | this course. Precise, concise & the | Content | is cutting edge & juicy! | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 3TdKKA-VEeWhsgqB1eduww | This course is awesome. It teaches from the ground and easy to understand all the contents. It helps to build up concept and is very helpful for further detail study in the same topic . | and easy to understand all the | Content | It helps to build up concept | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | Great course, very nice professor. Lots of content about one | course, very nice professor. Lots of | Content | about one | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | There is much to praise: nice mapwork, a steady and organized march through time, and some interesting case studies (I especially enjoyed the lecture on Henry Adams). However, the title is a complete misnomer, as the course is regrettably white bread history. I found the approach stale and western-centric, as the content actually covers western Europe and the stretch of its influence through the time period. I also found myself questioning the veracity of many conclusions, as the lecture often had difficulty citing more than a couple specific points of evidence for his arguments. | approach stale and western-centric, as the | Content | actually covers western Europe and the | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | I think Professor Philip Zelikow is a charismatic speaker. I enjoy listening such an eloquent teacher. The content of the lesson is compact, complete, enlightening and inspiring. I find some of the quiz questions ambiguous. Thank you very much. | listening such an eloquent teacher. The | Content | of the lesson is compact, complete, | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | Although the content is interesting, I would have liked it better had the content and the instructor been a little more engaging. | Although the | Content | is interesting, I would have liked | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | Although the content is interesting, I would have liked it better had the content and the instructor been a little more engaging. | have liked it better had the | Content | and the instructor been a little | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | Great content, the teacher makes it easy to understand in few minutes the general idea of every topic | Great | Content | the teacher makes it easy to | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | This was my first course, so I don't have any comparison. But I found it really well done. Clearly spoken, interesting content, well understandable. A good introduction to worlds recent history! | really well done. Clearly spoken, interesting | Content | well understandable. A good introduction to | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | Amazing content and the professor makes the lecture very friendly and interesting. | Amazing | Content | and the professor makes the lecture | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | Content is 5 for sure. The fact that they keep suggesting to go for a verified course however is a little bit annoyig, so 1 star off for that. I think it would be more appropriate to give an option to disable future asking similar to how ratings on Android work. That being said, the course is excellent I'm taking this for pure fun and it really is, ... fun! :D | | Content | is 5 for sure. The fact | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | Perhaps the reason why I really like this course is that I am very excited about learning world history. But the course content and the way professor delivers lectures is amazing. | learning world history. But the course | Content | and the way professor delivers lectures | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 3Vo3Am1LEeWMPAqsmzmVew | The course is fine in the content. As usual, the presentation from Brian Caffo is rather rushed and stumbling. A better presenting style would improve the course no end, but ultimately, what is covered is what you need. I generally just avoid the videos and read the slides. | The course is fine in the | Content | As usual, the presentation from Brian | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 3Vo3Am1LEeWMPAqsmzmVew | Although it is an easy course to pass, it is very important in content. It teaches the finishing moves, the ones you'll need after all your hard work. 5-star without doubt. | pass, it is very important in | Content | It teaches the finishing moves, the | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 3Vo3Am1LEeWMPAqsmzmVew | Great course. Very practical and state-of-the-art contents. | Great course. Very practical and state-of-the-art | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 3Vo3Am1LEeWMPAqsmzmVew | Great introduction for how to deliver content that is easily digestible by non-technical people. | Great introduction for how to deliver | Content | that is easily digestible by non-technical | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 3Vo3Am1LEeWMPAqsmzmVew | This review does not reflect the course content. The new Coursera UI makes it impossible to download transcripts or slides of the videos. Without these features, following the lectures is significantly more difficult, and I can't rate this course any higher than 1 star. I would rate it zero stars if that was possible. | review does not reflect the course | Content | The new Coursera UI makes it | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 3Vo3Am1LEeWMPAqsmzmVew | The new platform is very versatile and easy to navigate. The page layout is much more clear. It is easy to navigate from course material to discussion boards. I like the Quiz format, including expanding the number of choices for the multiple choice selections, but the grading was confusing. For Quiz 3, some questions came back with multiple "Well Done" comments, even when I had not selected the answer for which I was being praised. I also was told I made errors on the same question.... and this was after I answered the question (Question 2, on R generic functions) the exact same as I had answered it when I took the course earlier this year. I was not a fan of not having to take a picture to submit work, so I am pleased that is no longer a requirement. I hope the typing pattern match is sufficient to affirm identity. I have one comment on content specific to this class. Week 3 content lacks relevancy to the project and data products in general. I agree that knowledge of R packages, classes, and methods is an important part of understanding R. I am not sure where that fits in the Data Science curriculum as a whole, though. Maybe expanding the curriculum to include a second, more advanced R class, with a project to write our own methods, build an R package, or do something with yhat. That would assign relevant work to reinforce the lectures. I would be happy to do further beta testing. DCP | identity. I have one comment on | Content | specific to this class. Week 3 | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 3Vo3Am1LEeWMPAqsmzmVew | The new platform is very versatile and easy to navigate. The page layout is much more clear. It is easy to navigate from course material to discussion boards. I like the Quiz format, including expanding the number of choices for the multiple choice selections, but the grading was confusing. For Quiz 3, some questions came back with multiple "Well Done" comments, even when I had not selected the answer for which I was being praised. I also was told I made errors on the same question.... and this was after I answered the question (Question 2, on R generic functions) the exact same as I had answered it when I took the course earlier this year. I was not a fan of not having to take a picture to submit work, so I am pleased that is no longer a requirement. I hope the typing pattern match is sufficient to affirm identity. I have one comment on content specific to this class. Week 3 content lacks relevancy to the project and data products in general. I agree that knowledge of R packages, classes, and methods is an important part of understanding R. I am not sure where that fits in the Data Science curriculum as a whole, though. Maybe expanding the curriculum to include a second, more advanced R class, with a project to write our own methods, build an R package, or do something with yhat. That would assign relevant work to reinforce the lectures. I would be happy to do further beta testing. DCP | specific to this class. Week 3 | Content | lacks relevancy to the project and | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | great content and useful knowledge, in real work. | great | Content | and useful knowledge, in real work. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | This course presented excellent educational material, activities and examples from real life that helps you to go through all the content keeping your interest from the beginning to the end. | you to go through all the | Content | keeping your interest from the beginning | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | It's hugely helpful. As an engineer, I learned many new stuff I would never have a chance to learn before . The two teachers are awesome. I really appreciate their teaching styles as well as the content. Many thanks to the teachers, Coursera and University of Michigan! | teaching styles as well as the | Content | Many thanks to the teachers, Coursera | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The course overall gave me insights into my role as a manager. I found the course content easy to understand and it gave me cause to reflect on my own role as a manager. The assignments made sense and relates to my every day work. | a manager. I found the course | Content | easy to understand and it gave | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | If you're currently working in a leadership role this course provides some thoughtful exercises and content you can apply to your day job. Good content (nothing earth-shattering, but a good presentation of the issues). | course provides some thoughtful exercises and | Content | you can apply to your day | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | If you're currently working in a leadership role this course provides some thoughtful exercises and content you can apply to your day job. Good content (nothing earth-shattering, but a good presentation of the issues). | apply to your day job. Good | Content | (nothing earth-shattering, but a good presentation | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Excellent course, great teachers. The content and real life examples make it relevant to professional development. Highly recommended. | Excellent course, great teachers. The | Content | and real life examples make it | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Course content and professors were excellent. Valuable insights and cross industry learnings to strengthen your leadership skills. Recommend. | Course | Content | and professors were excellent. Valuable insights | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Excellent content | Excellent | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good content, interesting, inspiring, somehow challenging assignments. Meets my expectations so far. | Very good | Content | interesting, inspiring, somehow challenging assignments. Meets | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The content is well presented. The exercises are valuable but the grading process needs improved. | The | Content | is well presented. The exercises are | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I ve learn a lot about specific details, mechanisms and angles to motivate others and btw myself. The course is accurate and well illustrated .I 've enjoyed the intelligiblity of the two men delivring the videos content. I recommend the course to any one since it for sure will enhance the fluidity or relationship at work and private life. | the two men delivring the videos | Content | I recommend the course to any | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | This is hands down the best MOOC I've taken so far on any subject. Both instructor's lectures excel in both choice and presentation of content, and the writing assignments force students to think about and understand the material to some degree of completion. Suggestions: There should be a non-trivial graded writing assignment every week. In the whole MOOC format, peer-graded writing assignments are the only instrument developed so far serving as a meaningful assessment device while forcing students to think about the material in a more than casual manner. The multiple choice quizzes are easily passed by listening to lectures and the material is quickly forgotten afterwards. Students submitting late may also be given the option to transfer their work so far to the next offering of the class. | in both choice and presentation of | Content | and the writing assignments force students | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great content, but it was too easy. I beleive students should have harder tasks to learn. | Great | Content | but it was too easy. I | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 487jV_KLEeS5LyIAC3lSsg | Organization of the class is clear and easy to follow. However, it might be better to place the Supplementary Readings after the Essential Readings for each unit. At times I would miss these required readings on the outline. Other times I would think they were required readings for the upcoming unit, when in actuality they were still part of the required readings for the previous unit. Most of the time, I come across the supplementary readings after the quiz has been taken. And when you're following the steps on the website the computer screen determines where you go once each step is completed. The quizzes at the end of each unit should be placed at the end of each unit. I appreciate the ability to take quizzes at least three times and that you use the same quiz for each time it is retaken. Something I would change about the quizzes is, that the quizzes display the questions that were asked, instead of just marking with a green check mark or red X next to the number and the question that was asked, once the quiz has been submitted. The videos and transcripts of those videos is very helpful. The videos are very clear and easy to understand. The content of the supplementary readings at times went over my head, but the content is both helpful and useful information.The due dates for each assignment was reasonable and flexible. Aside from including the questions asked for each quiz after submission I would change your policy of establishing the honor code. When attempting to have my picture taken along with my ID to establish identification my head didn't quite line up with the Head Frame displayed on my screen and the button needed to be pressed in order to take the picture. The button was either not visible or the head shot frame was too high up. I understand the need to establish ones identity during online classes, but wouldn't it be better to create a electronic pledge for the students to agree to? One that would uphold and honor the Coursera Honor Code; When someone is asked to type the same sentence repeatedly they're typing speed can increase because of the familiarity of that sentence. Also, the need to take more than one photo of the student before a quiz might make them feel uncomfortable. Especially, when the student is taking a quiz later in the day and may not exactly be "picture really". | clear and easy to understand. The | Content | of the supplementary readings at times | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 487jV_KLEeS5LyIAC3lSsg | Organization of the class is clear and easy to follow. However, it might be better to place the Supplementary Readings after the Essential Readings for each unit. At times I would miss these required readings on the outline. Other times I would think they were required readings for the upcoming unit, when in actuality they were still part of the required readings for the previous unit. Most of the time, I come across the supplementary readings after the quiz has been taken. And when you're following the steps on the website the computer screen determines where you go once each step is completed. The quizzes at the end of each unit should be placed at the end of each unit. I appreciate the ability to take quizzes at least three times and that you use the same quiz for each time it is retaken. Something I would change about the quizzes is, that the quizzes display the questions that were asked, instead of just marking with a green check mark or red X next to the number and the question that was asked, once the quiz has been submitted. The videos and transcripts of those videos is very helpful. The videos are very clear and easy to understand. The content of the supplementary readings at times went over my head, but the content is both helpful and useful information.The due dates for each assignment was reasonable and flexible. Aside from including the questions asked for each quiz after submission I would change your policy of establishing the honor code. When attempting to have my picture taken along with my ID to establish identification my head didn't quite line up with the Head Frame displayed on my screen and the button needed to be pressed in order to take the picture. The button was either not visible or the head shot frame was too high up. I understand the need to establish ones identity during online classes, but wouldn't it be better to create a electronic pledge for the students to agree to? One that would uphold and honor the Coursera Honor Code; When someone is asked to type the same sentence repeatedly they're typing speed can increase because of the familiarity of that sentence. Also, the need to take more than one photo of the student before a quiz might make them feel uncomfortable. Especially, when the student is taking a quiz later in the day and may not exactly be "picture really". | went over my head, but the | Content | is both helpful and useful information. | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 4BkqMnE8EeWxvQr3acyajw | Great faculty and course content | Great faculty and course | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 4gFDJxJhEeayXBIQdVd_6w | A bit disorganized and rambling lectures. Good content | bit disorganized and rambling lectures. Good | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | An absolutely complete course that teaches about Luxury companies, but mainly about Fashion. There are 2 great teachers that gives contents, but also makes sudents think about future and trends. Cases and interviews are also great !! I got very impressed about quality of Albini Group. Its clearer for me definition luxury vs fashion, business models, differences, challenges and opportunities in Fashion companies. Thank you Bocconi ! | are 2 great teachers that gives | Content | but also makes sudents think about | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | Excellent content! | Excellent | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | great material content and overall structure | great material | Content | and overall structure | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | Excellent contents, but relator's english is pretty bad. :-) | Excellent | Content | but relator's english is pretty bad. | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | While the content of the course is interesting and useful, the delivery desperately needs improvement. The professors speak in an extremely monotonous way, making it seem like they are reading their lines from behind the camera. Just awful, and makes it really hard to follow and stay interested and connected with the topic (even when you're passionate about the subject). I would rather have the course in Italian, and read the subtitles, if that means a more energetic delivery. | While the | Content | of the course is interesting and | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | I loved this course, the content is good, has a lot of interviews and cases. | I loved this course, the | Content | is good, has a lot of | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | The content of the course is very interesting, and I plan to go go through with it. A huge downside is that it is very difficult to follow the course because of the professors' strong accent and, at times, incorrect pronunciation. It is distracting. Also, it would be good to have weekly assignments, to stay on track. | The | Content | of the course is very interesting, | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | Contents are good and interesting, but speakers' english is so low and bad (pronunciation) that the course becomes almost unpleasant. | | Content | are good and interesting, but speakers' | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | The Management of Fashion and Luxury Companies offered by Bocconi & Coursera is a wonderfully informative, interactive and innovative course. The course uses real world high fashion and luxury examples and iconic figures to deliver their content. This engages the student with real life examples and helps us see what the future of fashion and luxury holds for us as potential managers. | and iconic figures to deliver their | Content | This engages the student with real | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | Although I did not finish the course, I enjoyed and was very satisfied with the content. The lecturers, although not very fluent English, were the best and new exactly what they were teaching which made me very happy. I easily understood what was being taught from the beginning. Although my passion is Fashion Design, this course helped me understand more about the Fashion Industry and everything behind the scene within the Industry. I am very happy with the knowledge gained :) | and was very satisfied with the | Content | The lecturers, although not very fluent | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | The content is very organize and clear. I have gone through 3 weeks and it is a great introduction to the world of luxury. | The | Content | is very organize and clear. I | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | Very good course, sad its finished. Good level of content aimed at a business professional interested in the fashion and luxury segment. | sad its finished. Good level of | Content | aimed at a business professional interested | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | The course content of this course is not much and thus one can finish it rather very quickly. However one of the lecturer's had such a heavy accent I had to use subtitles just to understand the content. I am not in anyway in the fashion industry nor aspiring to be so this was just like a "tester" for me. I was however surprised that its not all about modelling and the sorts but incorporates some business aspect about the fashion industry. | The course | Content | of this course is not much | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | The course content of this course is not much and thus one can finish it rather very quickly. However one of the lecturer's had such a heavy accent I had to use subtitles just to understand the content. I am not in anyway in the fashion industry nor aspiring to be so this was just like a "tester" for me. I was however surprised that its not all about modelling and the sorts but incorporates some business aspect about the fashion industry. | use subtitles just to understand the | Content | I am not in anyway in | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | Amazing teachers, great content! | Amazing teachers, great | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | The quality of the content is very good. However, the content should be more detailed. Further, certain key subject-areas are missing such as the fashion calendar, quality control, merchandising, cool-hunting and forecasting, market research, event management, public relations management, retail operations in more detail, logistics, store operations etc. Overall, however, the course is a good overview about managing fashion and luxury companies. Moreover, interviews with CEOs and brand directors would make the course more interesting. | The quality of the | Content | is very good. However, the content | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | The quality of the content is very good. However, the content should be more detailed. Further, certain key subject-areas are missing such as the fashion calendar, quality control, merchandising, cool-hunting and forecasting, market research, event management, public relations management, retail operations in more detail, logistics, store operations etc. Overall, however, the course is a good overview about managing fashion and luxury companies. Moreover, interviews with CEOs and brand directors would make the course more interesting. | content is very good. However, the | Content | should be more detailed. Further, certain | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 4vLX1NAeEeWihQ6ogHC6vQ | The course content is highly challenging and that's great for a sense of accomplishment. The biological problems motivates the biologist to go through the abstract mathematical concepts(but I have to admit there is a threshold where the biologist can not get it well anymore(greedy motifs, gibbs ...) and I wonder if he does really need it to be practical with day to day problems with chip array seq selex...) be ready you will struggle hard here | The course | Content | is highly challenging and that's great | Positive | 0.9 | 4.0 |
| 4vLX1NAeEeWihQ6ogHC6vQ | Very badly linked with other websites that provide the actual content. This is more like a click-bait setup than the actual course. I'm not sure why it's even offered on Coursera, other than to make money on a more popular website using the content hosted by less popular one. Very bad experience. | other websites that provide the actual | Content | This is more like a click-bait | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| 4vLX1NAeEeWihQ6ogHC6vQ | Very badly linked with other websites that provide the actual content. This is more like a click-bait setup than the actual course. I'm not sure why it's even offered on Coursera, other than to make money on a more popular website using the content hosted by less popular one. Very bad experience. | a more popular website using the | Content | hosted by less popular one. Very | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 4vLX1NAeEeWihQ6ogHC6vQ | This is not a beginner's course unless you already have previous programming experience. The Python lessons are just samples taken from a completely different curriculum on Codecademy and poorly integrated into the bio-centric course content. The lessons are disjointed, taken out of context, and some of the examples are using the wrong version of Python and missing parentheses. It would be a lot better if they took the time to actually craft custom Python lessons designed specifically for this course instead of using ill-fitting lessons from other classes. | poorly integrated into the bio-centric course | Content | The lessons are disjointed, taken out | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good quality content and great instructor. I recommend it! It does not cover though a very important feature from angular: directives. | Good quality | Content | and great instructor. I recommend it! | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Had good content but description was a like scattered manner. It could have better if explanation should be in fluent manner. | Had good | Content | but description was a like scattered | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Great Content, and by the end of the course you have a full fledged Front-end website working. | Great | Content | and by the end of the | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | A massive amount of content to cover, some of it quite advanced. The exercises become fraught if your code is out of sync with the tutor's code. Things won't work, you won't know why, and there's no real recovery from that. | A massive amount of | Content | to cover, some of it quite | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Pros: a lot of good content, worth 8 weeks of study, so good bang for the buck. Takes modular approach, where things are gradually taken apart and shown how to improve using another Angular module or approach. Cons: can be a little academical, very time-intensive. I have a much better understanding now of MVC concept using JS framework. | Pros: a lot of good | Content | worth 8 weeks of study, so | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This course is deceivingly full of content. If you want to get through this course you need to have a lot of time on your hands because of the shear amount of debugs your code will produce even if you follow the steps to the letter. So many things are taught over a 4 week period that if you do not do the extra reading to understand what is happening you will get an overview of angularjs, bower, gulp, grunt, yo, yeoman and so on without really knowing how to use any of these tools again. Also because of the number of interdependent parts to the application you create, when the professor decides to give you one of the html or js files again to do an assignment, chances are everything will break and you will spend a long time figuring out which variables' names have been changed and blabla... The professor does not give you a good basis for debugging your code, you need to modify the set up of gulp to show understandable stack traces to figure out what is going wrong. If you want a challenging course where you have to go the extra mile learning things from documentation and blogs to substitute the lack of detail in order to complete the course, than this is the course for you! I think this course needs to be restructured and the length increased to 6 weeks instead of 4, with more detailed content and understand of each tool and especially more on angularjs | This course is deceivingly full of | Content | If you want to get through | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This course is deceivingly full of content. If you want to get through this course you need to have a lot of time on your hands because of the shear amount of debugs your code will produce even if you follow the steps to the letter. So many things are taught over a 4 week period that if you do not do the extra reading to understand what is happening you will get an overview of angularjs, bower, gulp, grunt, yo, yeoman and so on without really knowing how to use any of these tools again. Also because of the number of interdependent parts to the application you create, when the professor decides to give you one of the html or js files again to do an assignment, chances are everything will break and you will spend a long time figuring out which variables' names have been changed and blabla... The professor does not give you a good basis for debugging your code, you need to modify the set up of gulp to show understandable stack traces to figure out what is going wrong. If you want a challenging course where you have to go the extra mile learning things from documentation and blogs to substitute the lack of detail in order to complete the course, than this is the course for you! I think this course needs to be restructured and the length increased to 6 weeks instead of 4, with more detailed content and understand of each tool and especially more on angularjs | instead of 4, with more detailed | Content | and understand of each tool and | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Update: Coursera or the course content provider has changed this course in a bad way: You have to PAY for the course IN FULL AMOUNT JUST to get your assignments submitted and reviewed by peer learner. What a pity. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Great course! Material is very useful and interesting! The course introduces concepts in a progressive and comprehensive way so that knowledge is easy to be understood. Practise quiz and assignments perfectly reflects course materials. Also, professor Muppala is quite funny. Enjoy the course! | Update: Coursera or the course | Content | provider has changed this course in | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Excelente curso, un gran agradecimiento al profesor Jogesh por su maravilloso curso, explicaciones y distribución de los contenidos, apropiados, acertados, con ejemplos claros y totalmente coherentes con los contenidos. Great course, special thanks to Jogesh for your well defined contents and explanations. Wish you understand some spanish :D | to Jogesh for your well defined | Content | and explanations. Wish you understand some | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Pity that people had to spend more time on making the plugins work than actually doing the exercises/assignments but good content nonetheless. | actually doing the exercises/assignments but good | Content | nonetheless. | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Awesome course content, nice explanation by the tutor. Must for beginners who want to have a start with AngularJS, grunt, gulp and other tools. | Awesome course | Content | nice explanation by the tutor. Must | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Interesting content, but sooo slow. 20 minutes long videos could have been done in 5 minutes. Moreover, the teacher's voice and tone did nothing to make the content live. | Interesting | Content | but sooo slow. 20 minutes long | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Interesting content, but sooo slow. 20 minutes long videos could have been done in 5 minutes. Moreover, the teacher's voice and tone did nothing to make the content live. | tone did nothing to make the | Content | live. | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | What an awesome course. The teacher is top-class, really knows the subject, and how to continually explain each module. The video exercises are just made for the student to grasp the content. One of the best courses I hev experienced on Coursera. | for the student to grasp the | Content | One of the best courses I | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good introduction to AngularJS. Moreover their provide a wide variety of additional information related to the course, which is very useful to enlarge the basic contents studied. | very useful to enlarge the basic | Content | studied. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course. It allows to learn the basics of angular js very fast and easily. I only missed a little more of content in directives scopes, but here you can learn a lot. | only missed a little more of | Content | in directives scopes, but here you | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I was able to grasp the overview of the course. The instructions are delivered well and the flow seems in order. However my lack of background with the topic discussed cause me to stop watching everything. Plus, I can't do the said assignment because I am a beginning on this topic. it seems this is not a course for me to rate based on content. However I will rate it in terms of the aesthetic, organization or structure of the slides . The organization of the content of the slides needs to be properly organized. Long paragraphs are a pain to read. Further when comparing, two concepts, it is easier to comprehend when they are in table form. For instance in FrontEnd JavaScript Framework Overview video, it is better in terms of organization and aesthetic to show library vs. framework in table form. Also, the volume of Introduction to AngularJS video is too loud. Though I can adjust it and lower the volume, but sudden high volume sound is discouraging when the next video has normal volume causing me to adjust it again. I was only able to watch few of the videos but they are good. Just a little improvement needed. | for me to rate based on | Content | However I will rate it in | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I was able to grasp the overview of the course. The instructions are delivered well and the flow seems in order. However my lack of background with the topic discussed cause me to stop watching everything. Plus, I can't do the said assignment because I am a beginning on this topic. it seems this is not a course for me to rate based on content. However I will rate it in terms of the aesthetic, organization or structure of the slides . The organization of the content of the slides needs to be properly organized. Long paragraphs are a pain to read. Further when comparing, two concepts, it is easier to comprehend when they are in table form. For instance in FrontEnd JavaScript Framework Overview video, it is better in terms of organization and aesthetic to show library vs. framework in table form. Also, the volume of Introduction to AngularJS video is too loud. Though I can adjust it and lower the volume, but sudden high volume sound is discouraging when the next video has normal volume causing me to adjust it again. I was only able to watch few of the videos but they are good. Just a little improvement needed. | slides . The organization of the | Content | of the slides needs to be | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 58H3s7ZHEeW2iwpbOuagWQ | This session was too long and a little boring. Could be shorter with the related contents. | Could be shorter with the related | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| 58H3s7ZHEeW2iwpbOuagWQ | Great content, I still need to go over it to glean the wealth of information that has been put together here. | Great | Content | I still need to go over | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 58H3s7ZHEeW2iwpbOuagWQ | While there is some interesting content, particuarly in the last week on design thinking, some of the course topics don't seem to hold together well, and the videos include a lot of monotonous talking heads. While this conveys the benefit of being able to listen to some of the videos without consistently watching, the interview questions asked of speakers are sometimes printed on the screen and not asked verbally. If you're not watching, you miss the questions. I would like to see this course refocused on design thinking for 3D printing, with other applications interspersed as examples rather than constituting the lion's share of the course. I believe that format would both be more engaging and do a better job of delivering skills with more opportunity for practice. | While there is some interesting | Content | particuarly in the last week on | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| 58H3s7ZHEeW2iwpbOuagWQ | Excellent course, could do with a little more visual references. Some of the talks are a bit tough to get through since you are watching 2 people. Content still very valuable. | since you are watching 2 people. | Content | still very valuable. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 5AYG1NbQEeWEOQ7ZE5jC0Q | Really poor powerpoint presentations and videos, half in chinese. The accent of the teacher is horrible (i'm not an english-native speaking person so it's hard for me to follow english when badly spoken, so i cut off the sound and only read the subtitles.) The content is interesting though. | only read the subtitles. ) The | Content | is interesting though. | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| 5c9BeiTUEeW3AhKilvRZ0Q | The course is fine as far as content. My complaint is that there is no one to contact regarding papers or questions. You are left to the other students for your grading and assignment completion, meaning that some of your assignments can hang there for weeks before ever getting reviewed. | course is fine as far as | Content | My complaint is that there is | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 5c9BeiTUEeW3AhKilvRZ0Q | It has good content, but there were missing classes to give more advices or clear any question students have, when grading peer review homeworks there were plenty of mistakes that would have been avoided if there were more video lectures or forums with teachers. | It has good | Content | but there were missing classes to | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| 5c9BeiTUEeW3AhKilvRZ0Q | through this course i was able to right effectively on some complex topics which was what i was hoping for. Thanks a lot to the instructor Tamy Chapman whose video lectures were excellent in content and quality. | whose video lectures were excellent in | Content | and quality. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 5D-g-HEiEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | Great resource! The content was excellent and gave me a great idea of how and where to look for more information and carry on with my studies. | Great resource! The | Content | was excellent and gave me a | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 5D-g-HEiEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | Its a program contents very interesting and important to know about work relationship and laws and too many things. | Its a program | Content | very interesting and important to know | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 5D-g-HEiEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | Great content. This course gives you a better context of the aspects a people manager should consider for developing useful strategies for the company, but thinking about the people too. | Great | Content | This course gives you a better | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 5epfT7cBEeScDCIAC9REiQ | Very good and interesting overall, the slides are very helpful. The only thing for me is that it's going a bit fast sometimes. The content can be quite technical and for a social science graduate like myself it would be nice if some very technical things could be explained just tiny bit more. But overall it's understandable and clearly done. | going a bit fast sometimes. The | Content | can be quite technical and for | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| 5epfT7cBEeScDCIAC9REiQ | A Fantastic course, bring forward a lot of new material to me personally. Having not studied any science since i was 16, and completed high school, i found this course extremely interesting and very much enjoyed the clear presentations. The content on bio-fuels was, for me, the highlight. | much enjoyed the clear presentations. The | Content | on bio-fuels was, for me, the | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 5g_hAYo4EeWTzg6WBWinhQ | Loved it! Content is great and form perfect for a deep glimpse into Agile and Design thinking. Thank you! | Loved it! | Content | is great and form perfect for | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| 5g_hAYo4EeWTzg6WBWinhQ | While the content and the curriculum of the course is ok, the course is not moderated enough in terms of answering the questions the participants have | While the | Content | and the curriculum of the course | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 5g_hAYo4EeWTzg6WBWinhQ | Good content easily explained with practical approach. Recommended | Good | Content | easily explained with practical approach. Recommended | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 5hRQhN9AEeWsvwp02yXW0Q | Excellent course with defined content, structure & theme ! | Excellent course with defined | Content | structure & theme ! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | This is a amazing course with great content, keeps you on the edge. Ludwig is a master of this ! Cheers | is a amazing course with great | Content | keeps you on the edge. Ludwig | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | I am an MBA and have studied marketing but this course was an addition to my knowledge of strategy. The content was practical and readily applicable to everyday business scenarios. I have been thinking about my own business for some time and I found this course tailored for myself. This course helped me develop strategic thinking. | to my knowledge of strategy. The | Content | was practical and readily applicable to | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Excelent course and content!! I'd like to have the course material to do a further study, though. | Excelent course and | Content | ! I'd like to have the | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Excellent course. Very good content and the instructor is excellent, explaining concepts and using very clear examples. Thanks! | Excellent course. Very good | Content | and the instructor is excellent, explaining | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Very much enjoyed the course; the instructor used good examples and the content was relevant and aligned well with the subject matter. Enough examples and quizzes to reinforce the theories. I'm looking forward to follow-up with the 2nd course. | instructor used good examples and the | Content | was relevant and aligned well with | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | This lecture series is clear and attractive. Location and media use are selected smart and charming. The contents excited me and I deliberately deal with Game Theory. You have enlightened our world bright, ... Thank you. | are selected smart and charming. The | Content | excited me and I deliberately deal | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | great course, great content and awesome professor. | great course, great | Content | and awesome professor. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Excellent, content, explanations and methods, highly recomend it | Excellent, | Content | explanations and methods, highly recomend it | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Interesting examples and useful contents for strategists | Interesting examples and useful | Content | for strategists | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | lectures are very well explained by the professor and slowly the complexity of the subject is exposed. The content was presented in a clear and sometimes funny/remarkable way. I learned quite a lot, so my thanks! | of the subject is exposed. The | Content | was presented in a clear and | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Is a good course. because have a resumed content with a practical view and usability in real world. | good course. because have a resumed | Content | with a practical view and usability | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Great course and well worth the time. I took this as a refresher and enjoyed it immensely. Great content, good lecturer. | refresher and enjoyed it immensely. Great | Content | good lecturer. | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | I have mixed feelings about this course. From a instructor and content perspective, this is by far the best. Tobias is a great teacher and he explains the concepts very nicely followed up by quizzes. What I hated about this course was the web exprience and how the final questions were set up. It gave a feeling that the intent was to "get you" vusrses questions that were more to see if a student has understood the concepts. Some of the multiple choice answers were borderline and a rational mind could go either way. So my suggestion is to significantly rewamp your quizzes. From a technical perspective, the system did not capture my results the first time, It graded me differently on the same set of questions (this needs to be really looked into) for example the first time I answered the question a certain way, it marked me correct, however the same answer in the next attemp was marked wrong??? This lead to a lot of confusion (and I am not saying because the numbers in the answers were changed on different attemps but the content itself was marked differently). I loved this course and would have loved to attempt the advanced strategy course however but for the above reasons will not. Its dissapointing that although the instructure and content is world class the technical glitches are too many for a student to have a seamless, learning experience. Hope this helps and topics mentioned aboove would be seriously looked into. I want this course to be a success as this the one of the most insightful courses that I have taken. | this course. From a instructor and | Content | perspective, this is by far the | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | I have mixed feelings about this course. From a instructor and content perspective, this is by far the best. Tobias is a great teacher and he explains the concepts very nicely followed up by quizzes. What I hated about this course was the web exprience and how the final questions were set up. It gave a feeling that the intent was to "get you" vusrses questions that were more to see if a student has understood the concepts. Some of the multiple choice answers were borderline and a rational mind could go either way. So my suggestion is to significantly rewamp your quizzes. From a technical perspective, the system did not capture my results the first time, It graded me differently on the same set of questions (this needs to be really looked into) for example the first time I answered the question a certain way, it marked me correct, however the same answer in the next attemp was marked wrong??? This lead to a lot of confusion (and I am not saying because the numbers in the answers were changed on different attemps but the content itself was marked differently). I loved this course and would have loved to attempt the advanced strategy course however but for the above reasons will not. Its dissapointing that although the instructure and content is world class the technical glitches are too many for a student to have a seamless, learning experience. Hope this helps and topics mentioned aboove would be seriously looked into. I want this course to be a success as this the one of the most insightful courses that I have taken. | changed on different attemps but the | Content | itself was marked differently). I loved | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | I have mixed feelings about this course. From a instructor and content perspective, this is by far the best. Tobias is a great teacher and he explains the concepts very nicely followed up by quizzes. What I hated about this course was the web exprience and how the final questions were set up. It gave a feeling that the intent was to "get you" vusrses questions that were more to see if a student has understood the concepts. Some of the multiple choice answers were borderline and a rational mind could go either way. So my suggestion is to significantly rewamp your quizzes. From a technical perspective, the system did not capture my results the first time, It graded me differently on the same set of questions (this needs to be really looked into) for example the first time I answered the question a certain way, it marked me correct, however the same answer in the next attemp was marked wrong??? This lead to a lot of confusion (and I am not saying because the numbers in the answers were changed on different attemps but the content itself was marked differently). I loved this course and would have loved to attempt the advanced strategy course however but for the above reasons will not. Its dissapointing that although the instructure and content is world class the technical glitches are too many for a student to have a seamless, learning experience. Hope this helps and topics mentioned aboove would be seriously looked into. I want this course to be a success as this the one of the most insightful courses that I have taken. | dissapointing that although the instructure and | Content | is world class the technical glitches | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Great course, I highly recommend it. I thank to the LMU for creating such a tremendous course with great contents and excellent teaching techniques. | such a tremendous course with great | Content | and excellent teaching techniques. | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Very good content, nice videos with interesting speaker. Very interactive course. | Very good | Content | nice videos with interesting speaker. Very | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | This course is amazing, the structure and contents are planned in an outstanding way. I am very glad that I found it. It fulfills my expectation way further. Congratulations to every member, professor and the team that made it possible. | course is amazing, the structure and | Content | are planned in an outstanding way. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Excellent, content. I see this as a valuable input to change our mindset and tailor it to a more strategic approach. Technics like Backwards induction really help to achieve this. Thanks :) | Excellent, | Content | I see this as a valuable | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Excellent course, very useful content explained in an easy and effective way. Highly recommended! | Excellent course, very useful | Content | explained in an easy and effective | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | A great introductory level course to Competitive Strategy. Professor Kretschmer does an excellent job of engaging the audience, keeping the content simultaneously light and yet challenging. The course highlights the basic premises of how best to enter a market and how to keep a competitor out of the market. You will also find ways to strategically price products for profitability based on the expected, logical reaction from your competitors. Thank you Professor Kretschmer for a great course. | of engaging the audience, keeping the | Content | simultaneously light and yet challenging. The | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | excellent course for both beginner and moderately adnvaced economy students and enthusiasts. press Kretchmer is very well spoken and explicit with his content | well spoken and explicit with his | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | This Course teaches you about the basics of Strategy making and clearly explains about the step by step approach with real time examples .Beauty of the course is no prerequisites are required and explanation of the content is of top notch | are required and explanation of the | Content | is of top notch | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 5iIbgmdpEeW0sAqIx1_alQ | incredible content and resources! | incredible | Content | and resources! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 5iIbgmdpEeW0sAqIx1_alQ | Excelent content | Excelent | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 5NGh4meREeSxSCIAC1SPQw | brilliant course. excellent teaching and content. | brilliant course. excellent teaching and | Content | | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| 5NGh4meREeSxSCIAC1SPQw | Amazing content, well presented, and very applicable to anyone who leads people. So much of what was covered resonated at a deep level for me. I return to this course again and again for inspiration, and I share and recommend it with many other friends and colleagues. | Amazing | Content | well presented, and very applicable to | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 5qe8W_5iEeSiniIAC1OXJA | Very good content and the teacher seems very comfortable with it! | Very good | Content | and the teacher seems very comfortable | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 5qe8W_5iEeSiniIAC1OXJA | Very nice course. Great content, well prepared presentations and easy to understand for non-economists. | Very nice course. Great | Content | well prepared presentations and easy to | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 5uY4gGkTEeSOPSIAC2gGHg | I would have expected more in terms of the depth of content beyond Ohio, but still it is very interesting and complete. A must do for anyone looking to build a startup ecosystem | in terms of the depth of | Content | beyond Ohio, but still it is | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | Honestly didn't learn much from this course. The majority of content is simply common sense, and things you'll know if you've spent any time on the internet in the recent years. The good parts were the evaluation of different marketing channels (traditional and digital) and various stats on how people spend from the industry (ownership of TV networks, time spent per day on different media, etc.). | from this course. The majority of | Content | is simply common sense, and things | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | This is basic content i wish it was a more outside just a lecture style where the lecturer just reads from the slides. | This is basic | Content | i wish it was a more | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | The content is good, but the way the lectures are given not so much. | The | Content | is good, but the way the | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | Very light in useful content | Very light in useful | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | Not up to my expectations. Compared to the previous modules in this specialisation, the lectures are dry, the presenter is not focused and slides are sometimes mixed up. The reading material is great and a definite plus is that it is free. But the lectures should be more practical (not just the bullet points of the book), and the weekly assignment should not be a chapter summary question. The course developers should have taken the time to develop a case study for each topic, like in the first module in this spec. I highly recommend reviewing and improving the content. | highly recommend reviewing and improving the | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | The presenter in this course is hard to follow and does not have good slides. She often does not put her bullet points or lists on the slides ( I am a visual learner and she does not provide enough on screen info) She is really uncomfortable and makes it really hard to listen to her talk. She struggles through the entire presentation which is just super distracting. Content is good though. | presentation which is just super distracting. | Content | is good though. | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | The content of this course is very good. However I feel it is unfortunate that the lecturer did not make an effort in preparing the presentation of the material. This makes a huge difference. Especially when it is an online course, the lecturer needs to bring the story to life rather than simply reading with hesitation from the slides in most instances. | The | Content | of this course is very good. | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | There is insufficient peers to review. The content is mostly theory from the e-textbook. | is insufficient peers to review. The | Content | is mostly theory from the e-textbook. | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | I think this course could have been more interesting. It was very dry with just slides and majority of the examples were not explained well. Especially the one about the marketing plan was not about plan but about presentation skills. This course content definitely needs update. | but about presentation skills. This course | Content | definitely needs update. | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | The professor is just reading the text. Not really a good example of interactive e-learning content. | a good example of interactive e-learning | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | Hated the course and the content. I truly regret investing my money on this course. | Hated the course and the | Content | I truly regret investing my money | Negative | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | The course structure is okay and availability of course material e-book is big plus for the course. However there are negatives also. This is a course on "Digital Marketing" and it has to be taken to great heights in terms of content and delivery. Most critical issue is delivery. The most happening and lively subject like this needs a delivery in a exalted method. Though reference material is good collection but there is total disconnect between video lectures and those reference material at many instances. Revamp all video series. Add more case studies videos. | to great heights in terms of | Content | and delivery. Most critical issue is | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | This course seems to have interesting content and presentation, but the quiz concerns the materials not covered in lectures or readings (be it required or supplementary). This is totally confusing. | This course seems to have interesting | Content | and presentation, but the quiz concerns | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | A great course with good literature, easy to follow videos, a nice community, and very helpful content! | a nice community, and very helpful | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | very slow pacing but ok content | very slow pacing but ok | Content | | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 6-AmfoyrEeWbIxKn7M-nSQ | Great content, Great Instructor and Great Presentation | Great | Content | Great Instructor and Great Presentation | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 6-FfIC8hEeWUWxIOAnoaFQ | Wonderfully insightful and relevant contents.... I could apply them to my company fully ... | Wonderfully insightful and relevant | Content | . . . I could apply | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 6-FfIC8hEeWUWxIOAnoaFQ | Great course, teacher and content. | Great course, teacher and | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | This course provides a nice insight into the gaming theory. Do not expect to make a dive into video game analysis. This game focuses on the fundamental ideas behind gaming, which includes all games. However, the assignments revolve around building board games, so you do not need to worry about not knowing any coding to make video games. Assignment criteria could use some polish, as the rubrics focus too much on mechanics (is it one page long?) rather than content elements. The delivery of the content is interesting. The instructor has gone to great lengths to bring in features that will help you focus better. There could be a better 100% integration between the material in the videos and the assignments, as sometimes you are asked to use only a tiny portion of 30 minutes of videos for the week, and that can make the videos less useful, or the assignment not as educational. | one page long? ) rather than | Content | elements. The delivery of the content | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | This course provides a nice insight into the gaming theory. Do not expect to make a dive into video game analysis. This game focuses on the fundamental ideas behind gaming, which includes all games. However, the assignments revolve around building board games, so you do not need to worry about not knowing any coding to make video games. Assignment criteria could use some polish, as the rubrics focus too much on mechanics (is it one page long?) rather than content elements. The delivery of the content is interesting. The instructor has gone to great lengths to bring in features that will help you focus better. There could be a better 100% integration between the material in the videos and the assignments, as sometimes you are asked to use only a tiny portion of 30 minutes of videos for the week, and that can make the videos less useful, or the assignment not as educational. | content elements. The delivery of the | Content | is interesting. The instructor has gone | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Clear and simple. Suitable for beginners. But most of the contents are rather too intuitive. | for beginners. But most of the | Content | are rather too intuitive. | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Very little content. Most of the value comes from working on games for the assignments. | Very little | Content | Most of the value comes from | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Nice organisation of course contents. Every stage, you can see your own game getting better. The peer students are especially good! | Nice organisation of course | Content | Every stage, you can see your | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | It felt few content, i think there could be more content in this course. Though i have to say i learn new stuff, but i which it had more content to learn more. | It felt few | Content | i think there could be more | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | It felt few content, i think there could be more content in this course. Though i have to say i learn new stuff, but i which it had more content to learn more. | i think there could be more | Content | in this course. Though i have | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | It felt few content, i think there could be more content in this course. Though i have to say i learn new stuff, but i which it had more content to learn more. | but i which it had more | Content | to learn more. | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Enjoyable but limited content | Enjoyable but limited | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | good course, really an introduction =) But the teacher is always reading a "Teleprompter". He is not spontaneous... Except when He uses RPG to demonstrate an example ;-) But the content is great | demonstrate an example ;-) But the | Content | is great | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Great content, nice way to get a basic notion of what it takes to creat a game, nice classes and method of learning, | Great | Content | nice way to get a basic | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Good course with good concepts but could do with a lot more depth. This course's content would be one week of content for other courses | a lot more depth. This course's | Content | would be one week of content | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Good course with good concepts but could do with a lot more depth. This course's content would be one week of content for other courses | content would be one week of | Content | for other courses | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | The course was fun and the progression through the weeks assignments was good. The contents were presented in a interesting way and were pertinent, but i would know a little more deeper. | the weeks assignments was good. The | Content | were presented in a interesting way | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Even if simple (it's an introduction, after all), the contents are well structured and I appreciate how the assignments can derive from the previous one and peers' feedback. It's satisfying to see the initial idea evolve into something more developed. | (it's an introduction, after all), the | Content | are well structured and I appreciate | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | The instructor is good but the amount of content is severely lacking compared to alternatives. | is good but the amount of | Content | is severely lacking compared to alternatives. | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Great Course, great professor, great videos and very very good content. Eve if you're not a beginner you should do this course to refresh your knowledge. | great videos and very very good | Content | Eve if you're not a beginner | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 6Fa6w3EjEeWbbw5cIAKQrw | I liked that it focus on new media, however I missed some text material to support the classes. Some minor mistakes on the exercises still need to be fixed. Some videos could be better produced, but the content is very good and I understand that it is also intended to be view on cellphones, so it was good. | could be better produced, but the | Content | is very good and I understand | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 6Fa6w3EjEeWbbw5cIAKQrw | Good: The video lectures cover a nice variety of topics giving you a good introduction of journalism, ethics, and other important considerations for becoming a journalist. Bad: The entire course feels hastily put together. Some of the videos have summarizing points, which is helpful when taking notes, but they flash on the screen briefly, then cut to a closeup of the lecturer, then cut back to the summery points so quickly that you can't copy them down and it becomes super distracting. The quizzes are a joke. They usually consist of 1-3 questions with two answers each and once choice so outrageous that they don't take any thought at all to complete. You could just skip to the quizzes without watching a single lecture and "ace" them easily. The assignments are also a joke. They ask for 1-2 sentence answers max! Some of them ask you to "use more than one word" to respond. I've taken free courses on here than involve 1000 word essays and then at least you're forced to process the information in the lectures. You can pass this course without watching a single lecture and that's a travesty to Michigan State. It is full of typos and oversights that could have been avoided if they had once person run through the course as a quality control. One of the quizzes has the answer included right beneath the question as a typo! The simple assignments are described in 3 different places, sometimes with conflicting instructions. They tell you what to do and how to review your peers in one section and then the actually assignment has different instructions on what to do than the page prior so you end up unsure of what the assignment actually wants you to do. For example: the final assignment at firsts asks you how to engage with your audience, and then you click next and the SAME question is now asking you how you distribute content. Did they even try?? In Summery: The content in the lectures are a good but shallow overview of journalism, but don't expect to be challenged to do anything but fill in ovals and regurgitate questions. Not too much to learn here. | now asking you how you distribute | Content | Did they even try? ? In | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| 6Fa6w3EjEeWbbw5cIAKQrw | Good: The video lectures cover a nice variety of topics giving you a good introduction of journalism, ethics, and other important considerations for becoming a journalist. Bad: The entire course feels hastily put together. Some of the videos have summarizing points, which is helpful when taking notes, but they flash on the screen briefly, then cut to a closeup of the lecturer, then cut back to the summery points so quickly that you can't copy them down and it becomes super distracting. The quizzes are a joke. They usually consist of 1-3 questions with two answers each and once choice so outrageous that they don't take any thought at all to complete. You could just skip to the quizzes without watching a single lecture and "ace" them easily. The assignments are also a joke. They ask for 1-2 sentence answers max! Some of them ask you to "use more than one word" to respond. I've taken free courses on here than involve 1000 word essays and then at least you're forced to process the information in the lectures. You can pass this course without watching a single lecture and that's a travesty to Michigan State. It is full of typos and oversights that could have been avoided if they had once person run through the course as a quality control. One of the quizzes has the answer included right beneath the question as a typo! The simple assignments are described in 3 different places, sometimes with conflicting instructions. They tell you what to do and how to review your peers in one section and then the actually assignment has different instructions on what to do than the page prior so you end up unsure of what the assignment actually wants you to do. For example: the final assignment at firsts asks you how to engage with your audience, and then you click next and the SAME question is now asking you how you distribute content. Did they even try?? In Summery: The content in the lectures are a good but shallow overview of journalism, but don't expect to be challenged to do anything but fill in ovals and regurgitate questions. Not too much to learn here. | even try? ? In Summery: The | Content | in the lectures are a good | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 6Fa6w3EjEeWbbw5cIAKQrw | I am still taking this course and I am really excited to take the other courses in the specialization. The topics are covered with in- depth analysis and I am very much satisfied with course content. | am very much satisfied with course | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 6JyoHjVOEeWBMQ5pdIoFkQ | I appreciate the fact that this course doesn't go into the fine detail on how to code everything, I believe there is still more information on the coding and data management practices that could be included in the course content. In addition to that, I feel the course could use the following adjustments to make it better: 1 - Have Python students grade other Python students and SAS students grade other SAS students. While it is nice to get exposure to another language, it is more than enough to learn one at a time. 2 - Add quizes and/or other well formed questions that are graded (automatically, not peer graded) to help enforce the concepts being taught. 3 - Make the assignment instructions/expectations more clear. I feel there are times when the grading criteria don't exactly match the requested assignment. While people follow the spirit of the assignment, the grading questions may ask for slightly different or additional items. 4 - Certain aspects of statistical analysis are glossed over and should be covered in more depth in the training videos. While I like the short videos for brevity, I would prefer to watch 10-15 minutes more content and really feel like the material was well covered. | could be included in the course | Content | In addition to that, I feel | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| 6JyoHjVOEeWBMQ5pdIoFkQ | I appreciate the fact that this course doesn't go into the fine detail on how to code everything, I believe there is still more information on the coding and data management practices that could be included in the course content. In addition to that, I feel the course could use the following adjustments to make it better: 1 - Have Python students grade other Python students and SAS students grade other SAS students. While it is nice to get exposure to another language, it is more than enough to learn one at a time. 2 - Add quizes and/or other well formed questions that are graded (automatically, not peer graded) to help enforce the concepts being taught. 3 - Make the assignment instructions/expectations more clear. I feel there are times when the grading criteria don't exactly match the requested assignment. While people follow the spirit of the assignment, the grading questions may ask for slightly different or additional items. 4 - Certain aspects of statistical analysis are glossed over and should be covered in more depth in the training videos. While I like the short videos for brevity, I would prefer to watch 10-15 minutes more content and really feel like the material was well covered. | prefer to watch 10-15 minutes more | Content | and really feel like the material | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 6JyoHjVOEeWBMQ5pdIoFkQ | Choosing an actual research question allows you to find a topic of interest. This makes the content more meaningful and accelerates understanding of the concepts. | topic of interest. This makes the | Content | more meaningful and accelerates understanding of | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 6JyoHjVOEeWBMQ5pdIoFkQ | The content is easy to follow and is clearly explained without adding unnecessary complexity at this entry level. This specialization reaches its goals. Instead of trying to over achieve it keeps things simple. I would recommend taking the "Data Science Specialization" as the next step. | The | Content | is easy to follow and is | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 6JyoHjVOEeWBMQ5pdIoFkQ | So far, course is one of the best I am taking. It moves at a slow enough pace that you feel you can actually learn explore but at the same time are not bored. The videos are well done and have the right balance of interesting content and skill building. | have the right balance of interesting | Content | and skill building. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 6JyoHjVOEeWBMQ5pdIoFkQ | The content is OK, but that's about it. Near zero interaction from staff, short videos leave a lot to be desired, and worst of all, there seems to be a problem getting everyone's assignments peer reviewed (which makes no sense). There is a somewhat comical thread wherein staff direct students to contact coursera directly via a "contact us" link on a page, but get this, the link isn't there. Students repeatedly pointed this out only to get directed again to the non-existant link. In an online forum it's important to actually address concerns. Replys that avoid directly addressing concerns sound like automated messages. And that's the feeling I get here. This course requires a DIY attitude and a willingness to proceed without feedback. If you're looking for a good example of online learning, look elsewhere. | The | Content | is OK, but that's about it. | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 6JyoHjVOEeWBMQ5pdIoFkQ | Bad material, poor graphics, wrong mc questions in videos. More hype content than a course. This is not the way to learn Python, seriously don't take this one | mc questions in videos. More hype | Content | than a course. This is not | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| 6kAowBObEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Awesome course and completely useful to understand better the history of Scandinavian Film and Television but also the circumstances that had made possible the big contents we are seeing coming from that region today. | that had made possible the big | Content | we are seeing coming from that | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 6kAowBObEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | I found the lectures very interesting; but was surprised at how the quizzes / assignments focused so much on facts and figures - surely these aren't nearly as important as understanding the content? | nearly as important as understanding the | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| 6kAowBObEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Thank you to the instructors and the university! A very interesting course that not only focuses on the content and quality of Scandinavian TV and movie productions but also on the broader (institutional and cultural) framework in which they are produced. I would have rated it 4.5 starts if possible, but as halves are not possible I give it 4. Possible improvements: -the delivery of the course can be a bit livier, smoother; some instructors seem a bit at unease with this format -while an interest in Scandinavian movies and TV series is an implicit prerequisite for a course like this, sometimes simply mentioning 'lists' of directors, movies, series you might never have heard of can make it a bit overwhelming, hard to relate to -students' engagement could be enhanced with more interactive assignments | that not only focuses on the | Content | and quality of Scandinavian TV and | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 6kAowBObEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Very good course as a starting point. Although it still shall be better if there could be more detailed, academic study contents involved. And in addition, it might be both more inspiring and more attracting if the lecturer giving the information with more spoken presentation which approaching to a real class rather than a fixed script text. | could be more detailed, academic study | Content | involved. And in addition, it might | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| 6kAowBObEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | I'm three weeks into and really enjoying this course. It's light – about 2-3 hours a week so far, plus maybe one film, feels sufficient. The student is free to choose her degree of intensity. At the same time it opens a richness of vistas on the study of film in general as well as the course content. I think it's a good model for the massive online course: both highly customisable and sufficiently demanding (deadlines are essential) to maintain engagement. | general as well as the course | Content | I think it's a good model | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | One of the best coursers I have seen on Coursera so far. The video production quality, course structure and content is extra ordinary compared to other courses that I've seen so far. | video production quality, course structure and | Content | is extra ordinary compared to other | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Very nice content and presented so nicely. Must read and highly recommended course for all managers and business analysts. | Very nice | Content | and presented so nicely. Must read | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Excellent course and excellent content | Excellent course and excellent | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Simply listening to somebody talk about the fundamentals of Agile, with no practical work whatsoever, could be an extremely boring experience. Thumbs up to the two people delivering the contents, because they both managed to do that in a very engaging way. Thanks! | to the two people delivering the | Content | because they both managed to do | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Thanks a lot for all the instructors and the team behind this course. The content quality reminds me of some agile principles. Simplicity of the words, the illustrations, the examples Feedback from students through the discussions Technical excellence and good design Welcoming change (I've witnessed commitments of the team to improve some points in the content) I'm thrilled to go on and look at the next courses I say Bravo ! Smail | the team behind this course. The | Content | quality reminds me of some agile | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Thanks a lot for all the instructors and the team behind this course. The content quality reminds me of some agile principles. Simplicity of the words, the illustrations, the examples Feedback from students through the discussions Technical excellence and good design Welcoming change (I've witnessed commitments of the team to improve some points in the content) I'm thrilled to go on and look at the next courses I say Bravo ! Smail | to improve some points in the | Content | I'm thrilled to go on and | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Great production values and more "meat" to it than the intro course. I like the scenario based questions. It still seems a little light on content, but the content that is present is good. | still seems a little light on | Content | but the content that is present | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Great production values and more "meat" to it than the intro course. I like the scenario based questions. It still seems a little light on content, but the content that is present is good. | little light on content, but the | Content | that is present is good. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | A very well organized and presented course with relevant content. | organized and presented course with relevant | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Good course! Excellent to reinforce my knowledge on scrum, xp and agile. In the end however I think that the content was somehow repetitive, but this not change the quality of the course. | end however I think that the | Content | was somehow repetitive, but this not | Negative | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | I really appreciate being able to do this course for free. It is by far the best course I have done in Coursera yet. The content is great and very well planned. So much to get your inspiration from and qualified to teachers to guide you along the way. What more can one ask for? | have done in Coursera yet. The | Content | is great and very well planned. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | Far too basic in content. It's clearly aimed at people with next to no experience at all on writing and publishing! However, it still is insightful and inspirational as, 'Writing for Young Readers' is taught by two established children writers and, packed with interviews of other writers from all around the world. A nice introduction but, just that -an introduction. If you have experience writing (for children or else) | Far too basic in | Content | It's clearly aimed at people with | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | These were very short lectures without a lot of content. For example the different kinds of publishing were described but no time was spent on how to evaluate publishers or how to decide what might work best for the author. The interviews with the published authors was by far the best part of this class and I enjoyed listening to them describe their writing lives. | short lectures without a lot of | Content | For example the different kinds of | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | This course is excellent, the content is rich, the videos are amusing and helpful, the interviews are just great. Thank you so much for such a high quality course! | This course is excellent, the | Content | is rich, the videos are amusing | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 6OW7QJ3WEeWILQ7D3uPEMw | I rated this as a 3 though I got a lot more out of the concepts and the class in the way it was taught than I had when reading books and literature on the subject. I would have wanted more discussions with cohorts taking the class to help cement the practices by virtue of seeing it from other perspectives in different work environments. I can imagine the same class with a moderator and someone facilitating the discussions would get me to the 5 rating. In a nutshell the content is great the experience of the class could be at a higher level then what I experienced. | 5 rating. In a nutshell the | Content | is great the experience of the | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| 6r0j3li_EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | These courses are some of the best I have ever seen on a MOOC platform. I am learning as much from the way instructors are teaching us, as from the content. | are teaching us, as from the | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 6Sqllx2uEea20BJooCBlFw | In terms of content the course is superficial and weak, it's also too much focused on promote Cruyff event and institute. | In terms of | Content | the course is superficial and weak, | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| 6VIQlm6rEeSDGiIAC1sNTA | Great content! | Great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | As annoying as the auto-grader was at times, I still enjoyed the course. The material was properly presented and curated which goes to say a lot of blood, tears and sweat was definitely put into the course. I highly recommend this course for beginning programmers and/ or more experienced programmers who many want to familiarize themselves with python syntax or get a refresher. A big thank you to the team and the initiatives behind this course most especially Professor Severance who has a unique style and engaging style of content delivering. | unique style and engaging style of | Content | delivering. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course is excellent and it's very easy for me to understand the content .Also,the teacher is very humerous. | easy for me to understand the | Content | . Also, the teacher is very | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Awesome course, I can not believe few weeks back I could not write a single statement in programming and now I can do basic things in programming, very well made course and it's content. Chuck is gem and his way of teaching is awesome. I really want to thank him. Thanks a lot team. | very well made course and it's | Content | Chuck is gem and his way | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Content presented well. Professor Chuck is great and feels like he's right there with you. Very taken with his dedication and love of teaching. It shines though and the course is wonderful. I'm in it simply for the knowledge and it's all FREE!!! This course should be mandatory in middle/high school. So critical to just basic thinking and problem solving completely unrelated to programming. | | Content | presented well. Professor Chuck is great | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great intro to python for non programmers. I have experience with programming and Python; was looking for a refresher, so I ended up finding this remedial (not surprising). Ended up breezing through the content in a weekend on 2x speed. With that said, this class is an excellent introduction to programming and python. Anyone should be able to pick Python up from this class. However, the only downside to this course in my opinion is that the programming assignments are trivial. In order to start thinking in terms of algorithms, you need to program. If you supplement this class with some programming challenges (which should be easy to find online), this will be a great way to get into Python. | surprising). Ended up breezing through the | Content | in a weekend on 2x speed. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The professor's lecture is so awesome, however, the content is adjust to the new programming learners. I heared extended part of the course is charged, you can purchased it if you want deeper learning | lecture is so awesome, however, the | Content | is adjust to the new programming | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great introduction! The content seems like it was put together in a very thoughtful way! | Great introduction! The | Content | seems like it was put together | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I enjoy the course, lectures, quises and complementary content a lot. One of my favourite studies. | the course, lectures, quises and complementary | Content | a lot. One of my favourite | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is my first course in Coursera, it's so excellent a trip. The content is so friendly for the beginners to start with and the logic in teaching methods are nice, too. Hope someday I can continue my further study with again. Thanks a lot. | it's so excellent a trip. The | Content | is so friendly for the beginners | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Hello, I am glad that I am getting this course from one of the (Best) Author of Python Book. I am really happy with the contents & teaching style that made me so confident about coding in Python. Contents are helpful, discussion forum clarifies many doubts & the deep understanding of each module in this course make it a perfect choice for anyone to who even does not know 'A' of Python's Alphabet or of any coding language can start & learn to code. Good initiative by Author & Mentor. Please provide many such courses in near future so that we can learn best from Top University which is anyway not possible for students like us with financial problems! We learn many things from home & from Greatest University like in this case University of Michigan! Thanks for all work for making this course available online. | I am really happy with the | Content | & teaching style that made me | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Hello, I am glad that I am getting this course from one of the (Best) Author of Python Book. I am really happy with the contents & teaching style that made me so confident about coding in Python. Contents are helpful, discussion forum clarifies many doubts & the deep understanding of each module in this course make it a perfect choice for anyone to who even does not know 'A' of Python's Alphabet or of any coding language can start & learn to code. Good initiative by Author & Mentor. Please provide many such courses in near future so that we can learn best from Top University which is anyway not possible for students like us with financial problems! We learn many things from home & from Greatest University like in this case University of Michigan! Thanks for all work for making this course available online. | so confident about coding in Python. | Content | are helpful, discussion forum clarifies many | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Easy and interesting, but the content is a little bit thin.. | Easy and interesting, but the | Content | is a little bit thin. . | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Really good introduction to Programming and also complete introduction to Python. Content is shown with an easy-to-follow logic recommended for everyone. | and also complete introduction to Python. | Content | is shown with an easy-to-follow logic | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The professor made the content easy to understand. As a beginner, this course introduces programming in a very thoughtful way. It keeps me focus on the right things so that I did not get freaked out at the beginning when the working environment looks very different from the experience of an end-user. And it step by step build up my understanding in programming elements. I signed up this course with rather strong motivation (my ultimate goal is to run statistical simulation and develop statistic packages for other users), so when I see the course introducing the elements I did not understand at all before, I can see the power behind those programming building blocks. Hence, this course really made me wanting to program more! | The professor made the | Content | easy to understand. As a beginner, | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I started taking a for-credit online course on Python through the UC Berkeley Extension, but found both that it didn't explain the basics, and that the actual content was sparse. I was very grateful to find this specialization, with the wonderful Charles Severance as the instructor! He's a very clear teacher, and charming besides. I loved course #1 of the specialization, and look forward to course #2, which lines up with the UC Berkeley course. Let's learn Python, shall we? | the basics, and that the actual | Content | was sparse. I was very grateful | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good content, but slow pace. tiny increments per week | good | Content | but slow pace. tiny increments per | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent Course Content with good assignment work !!! Dr Severance is a Great Professor. | Excellent Course | Content | with good assignment work ! ! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Prof Severance is great, and while the course content is very basic, he makes it super easy to follow | is great, and while the course | Content | is very basic, he makes it | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I did like this course however it is very very basic. I think it should have been merged with course 2 as the course contents are as good as one week work. | with course 2 as the course | Content | are as good as one week | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | An excellent teacher and excellent content for people interested in programming (even if they don't have the basic knowledge of algorithm) | An excellent teacher and excellent | Content | for people interested in programming (even | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It is really great step-by-step tutorial which helps you to make first steps with python. Good samples, easy to get content, nice additional materials. | python. Good samples, easy to get | Content | nice additional materials. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | awesome lecturer and content thnx for your time!!!! | awesome lecturer and | Content | thnx for your time! ! ! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Enjoyed, enjoyed the insights from lecturer and bonus interviews. Content all had purpose. | insights from lecturer and bonus interviews. | Content | all had purpose. | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent programming course for beginners. Awesome instructor and a very well structured course content. | and a very well structured course | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | the content and exercise are very helpful | the | Content | and exercise are very helpful | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Awesome content, awesome professor. | Awesome | Content | awesome professor. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good beginner course! For the content is not so intimidating for beginner to chicken out half-way. Thumbs up! | Good beginner course! For the | Content | is not so intimidating for beginner | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very Informative and the course is designed well to make the contents clear. | is designed well to make the | Content | clear. | Negative | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very apt content and the explanation was in simple words and to the point. | Very apt | Content | and the explanation was in simple | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great teaching style and well explained content. | Great teaching style and well explained | Content | | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good, he is so funny and contents also good and easy to understand. | good, he is so funny and | Content | also good and easy to understand. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good content for getting started in Python. | Very good | Content | for getting started in Python. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | To be honest, I thought the course stumbled and fell short. It was too basic and slow paced. The tone was a bit immature at times, and perhaps appropriate only for a grade school level classroom--not something for working professionals. And it's certainly not mature enough or challenging enough for a university class. Even if the goal were to teach those with no programming experience, it could accomplish that while providing more content, and making the content relevant. Is the course worth the price? Hell no. If you do pay, you may feel very cheated at the end. The entire course can be reduced to 3 pages of notes. One would be better off checking into other free, online tutorials. I'm not sure about the value of the videos titled "Office Hours." They all appeared as self-promotional behavior from the professor, as if to say, "hey look how great I am making this video in Paris." They're really nothing more than that. In one video, he corners a guest speaker at a conference, who appears annoyed after a few minutes and gives the professor a polite brush-off: "other people here would like to talk with me too." After all of these videos, you will ask yourself, "okay, why did Severance make me watch that?" "What was the point?" And you'll shrug your shoulders and say, "another waste of time." | could accomplish that while providing more | Content | and making the content relevant. Is | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | To be honest, I thought the course stumbled and fell short. It was too basic and slow paced. The tone was a bit immature at times, and perhaps appropriate only for a grade school level classroom--not something for working professionals. And it's certainly not mature enough or challenging enough for a university class. Even if the goal were to teach those with no programming experience, it could accomplish that while providing more content, and making the content relevant. Is the course worth the price? Hell no. If you do pay, you may feel very cheated at the end. The entire course can be reduced to 3 pages of notes. One would be better off checking into other free, online tutorials. I'm not sure about the value of the videos titled "Office Hours." They all appeared as self-promotional behavior from the professor, as if to say, "hey look how great I am making this video in Paris." They're really nothing more than that. In one video, he corners a guest speaker at a conference, who appears annoyed after a few minutes and gives the professor a polite brush-off: "other people here would like to talk with me too." After all of these videos, you will ask yourself, "okay, why did Severance make me watch that?" "What was the point?" And you'll shrug your shoulders and say, "another waste of time." | providing more content, and making the | Content | relevant. Is the course worth the | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The course as well as the course contents are perfect. Dr. Chuck explains all the concepts really well. Whether one has done programming earlier or not, this course will give you an insight of what programming means. I would highly recommend this course to everyone who wants to learn Python. Go for it . Good Luck! | course as well as the course | Content | are perfect. Dr. Chuck explains all | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very educative course, amiable teacher and relevant content! | educative course, amiable teacher and relevant | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It is great course and the Content is well explained and very interesting | It is great course and the | Content | is well explained and very interesting | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Material well presented. The exercises/assignments were relevant and challenging enough to help in grasping the course content. | to help in grasping the course | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The pace of this course & the course content, along with the Creative Commons material is fabulous for anyone who has no prior experience in programming. Prof. Severance is great at what he does, and the assignments are also brilliant. I wished there were more peer review assignments or more assignments so that we could practice more. | of this course & the course | Content | along with the Creative Commons material | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A very good course for beginners, especially those who have not programmed anything before. If you have prior experience in programming and not aiming for the Specialization, you can just skip ahead ;) Just one note: if you're really enthusiastic, all the content here won't be enough for you! | if you're really enthusiastic, all the | Content | here won't be enough for you! | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | One of the best courses I've taken on Coursera. The content is very crisp and not too overly simplistic and very, very engaging. The faculty, Charles Severance is superb. His explanations and videos are a good balance of fun and learning. This course rekindled my love for coding and the Bonus videos are kinda..they are simply great. | courses I've taken on Coursera. The | Content | is very crisp and not too | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course content. | Very good course | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I would give the content and presentation 4.5 to 5 stars. I found the platform ok but with some glitches. | I would give the | Content | and presentation 4. 5 to 5 | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course, as its name suggests is for anyone including people who have no previous background in programming. One can skip parts based on her experience. Having some experience in programming, I still found it useful. It gives the basics of the language, syntax, what happens when we interact with a computer etc. The instructor was well prepared not only in terms of content but also it is obvious he cares about things like teaching at scale. I also liked he gave credit to everyone who helped him to prepare for the course. I suggest this to anyone who wants to learn python, based on ones experience and dedication, completing all the content can take down to 1-2 days. | prepared not only in terms of | Content | but also it is obvious he | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course, as its name suggests is for anyone including people who have no previous background in programming. One can skip parts based on her experience. Having some experience in programming, I still found it useful. It gives the basics of the language, syntax, what happens when we interact with a computer etc. The instructor was well prepared not only in terms of content but also it is obvious he cares about things like teaching at scale. I also liked he gave credit to everyone who helped him to prepare for the course. I suggest this to anyone who wants to learn python, based on ones experience and dedication, completing all the content can take down to 1-2 days. | experience and dedication, completing all the | Content | can take down to 1-2 days. | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great professor, great content. It can give you a great idea of what is Python and how it works. | Great professor, great | Content | It can give you a great | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Awesome Course. The way Respected Instructor teaches, even a person without technical background can become an expert. Due to his style of teaching and content people start loving programming | to his style of teaching and | Content | people start loving programming | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent content, very clear and easy to understand with good examples and exercises! | Excellent | Content | very clear and easy to understand | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The professor is so interesting! He also makes the content easy to understand. Highly recommend for beginners! | so interesting! He also makes the | Content | easy to understand. Highly recommend for | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great course, step-by-step learning. Content is easy to understand and well explained. Videos provide further explanation, if required. If you want to learn Python by yourself, get enrolled now! | Great course, step-by-step learning. | Content | is easy to understand and well | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Interesting and useful contents, knowledgeable yet humorous lecturer! Really enjoy the course! | Interesting and useful | Content | knowledgeable yet humorous lecturer! Really enjoy | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Dr Chuck is a very good instructor who manage to inject both humor and clarity into his teaching. He got me hooked on Python! I always look forward to the next lesson. The lesson content is well-planned and paced..Great work! | to the next lesson. The lesson | Content | is well-planned and paced. . Great | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Lectures clearly explained & good content shared. Enjoyed the classes. | Lectures clearly explained & good | Content | shared. Enjoyed the classes. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great course! Very happy with the course structure and content and most of all, Dr. Chuck's teaching style is compare to none. Mind blowing! | happy with the course structure and | Content | and most of all, Dr. Chuck's | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Well organized contents. Great for Python beginners with some experiences of other programming language (like R). The only pity is that some of the functions (like the "raw-input", "print", etc.) are not compatible with the latest versions of Python, so you have to check it out online by yourself. | Well organized | Content | Great for Python beginners with some | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I love this class because the teacher is humorous and the content is understandable. It triggers my interest to take more courses about Python. Thanks very much! | the teacher is humorous and the | Content | is understandable. It triggers my interest | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Fantastic class. The teacher is amazing. The content is paced well. I love everything about this... | class. The teacher is amazing. The | Content | is paced well. I love everything | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The right course which gets you started with programming. The instructor makes it right too by putting in tremendous effort in explaining the content with so much fun. | in tremendous effort in explaining the | Content | with so much fun. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Un curso muy útil para aprender Python des de 0. Contenido muy didáctico y muy bien explicado! ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Very usefull course for learning Python with no previous experience. Very didactic content and with well explained classes. Thanks Dr. Severance! | with no previous experience. Very didactic | Content | and with well explained classes. Thanks | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent course, specially if you want to start from scratch. It gives you the feeling of being in an actual class. I've done the whole codecademy python course, which was very focused on the practical side, and it is great now to do this course to understand the theory behind it, and what was I actually doing. I'll certainly continue. Thanks for the awesome content! | certainly continue. Thanks for the awesome | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great and interesting course introducing Programming in Python! The instructor and his style makes it much easier to remember course content and learn Python. Besides, it was fun, because Dr.Chuck has great sense of humor. | it much easier to remember course | Content | and learn Python. Besides, it was | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Charles Severance is a BRILLIANT teacher. The way he explains the content, and how he asures that you UNDERSTAND the basics of Python programming makes this course great. Highly recomendable for those who aim getting strong basic programming skills. | teacher. The way he explains the | Content | and how he asures that you | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great introduction to programming, I brought the course book, it makes the assignments easier and the content is better understood and retained. The pdf version is available free, but for me having a paper copy is just easier to flick through, read and reference. | makes the assignments easier and the | Content | is better understood and retained. The | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course gets full stars because of the content and because of Professor. He made this course really interesting than what it would have become if we had to just study from a book. | gets full stars because of the | Content | and because of Professor. He made | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I appreciate the efforts made by the team, especially Dr.Chuck the way the content is delivered. | especially Dr. Chuck the way the | Content | is delivered. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is an awesome class for beginning programmers! The course content is easy and the instructor is very tho | class for beginning programmers! The course | Content | is easy and the instructor is | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Outstanding teaching. Great content. Very well designed. Excellent tools. Thank you very much for this. | Outstanding teaching. Great | Content | Very well designed. Excellent tools. Thank | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great course that makes the content self-paced. The book is accessible and the expectation of assignments is reasonable. I highly recommend. | Great course that makes the | Content | self-paced. The book is accessible and | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The content inside this course is well tought through. Questions and asignments holds high quality. If you haven't been in contact with Python before, this might be the first step for you, and when I say first step, then I really mean first step. | The | Content | inside this course is well tought | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great professor, very humor, great course content, very inspiring. | Great professor, very humor, great course | Content | very inspiring. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very informative course. Anyone who wants to start learning python, should start with this course and subsequently opt for other courses into Python specialization. And, 5 out of 5 for Dr. Charles Severance and team. Love the way this course content is structured and is presented to students. Thanks, Rakesh | team. Love the way this course | Content | is structured and is presented to | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good information and great delivery of content. | good information and great delivery of | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent content. A good start for people who does't have any knowledge about programming. | Excellent | Content | A good start for people who | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A lot of enthusiasm from the lecturer. Lecturer explains well. Very easy to understand. Content sequenced well | explains well. Very easy to understand. | Content | sequenced well | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The content is good and easy to follow but lack depth. | The | Content | is good and easy to follow | Positive | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good didactics and content. | Good didactics and | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great introduction for programming. I think it can be improved with more logic content and assignments, as well as some real cases (such as real examples of text file parsing, etc). | can be improved with more logic | Content | and assignments, as well as some | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Thank you for preparing this excellent class, it helps me a lot. The videos after the class content is great as well. | lot. The videos after the class | Content | is great as well. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very well thought of course content and delivery ... | very well thought of course | Content | and delivery . . . | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The course content is good. As a beginner i found it very much helpful for learning python. | The course | Content | is good. As a beginner i | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A very good content with additional inspiring interviews. Names on it, it is getting started course, it is giving foundations of Python. Because I have some programming background in Java, I have completed it in a week without skipping anything. Dr. Charles Severance makes his job very well and more importantly in very enjoying way :). I'm looking forward to taking next Python course from him. Last but not least, very thanks to Coursera for providing us accessing top class courses in free of charge. Best wishes for all from Turkey. | A very good | Content | with additional inspiring interviews. Names on | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I like the interactive way of teaching by Dr. Chuck and a great content for starting python | by Dr. Chuck and a great | Content | for starting python | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Easy to follow and not boring. The instructor breaks things down in simple form. The Coursera platform is sometimes a bit quirky but otherwise the content in this course I thought was quite excellent. | a bit quirky but otherwise the | Content | in this course I thought was | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This was my first Coursera course I ever completed. As programmer most of the content I already knew, but I believed there is also some info might be between the lines, which it was actually true, and in top of that it was fun all the way. Thank you Dr. Chunck | completed. As programmer most of the | Content | I already knew, but I believed | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great content. | Great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Specific to the point,Course content is very simple and easily understandable. | Specific to the point, Course | Content | is very simple and easily understandable. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | We tried to use this class to teach a brown bag lunch for our employees interested in programming. Python is a great language but this class has a very low content to volume ratio (nobody wants to watch the instructor meet his life-time idol at a trade-show or watch the Intel versus AMD melt-down commercials over their lunch break). | this class has a very low | Content | to volume ratio (nobody wants to | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Ideal for starters of python programming.. Content is easy to understand and the delivery by the prof is exceptional. | for starters of python programming. . | Content | is easy to understand and the | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course was excellent for the beginner. A little more content for the length would have made it 5 stars. | for the beginner. A little more | Content | for the length would have made | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent course, the content is very good and the explanations are clear. Un curso excelente, buen contenido y buenas explicaciones. Muy recomendado. | Excellent course, the | Content | is very good and the explanations | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great content, great tutorials. | Great | Content | great tutorials. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The class is well paced and the instructor provides the content in a very easy to digest mode. | paced and the instructor provides the | Content | in a very easy to digest | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It is just amazing course for student who want to start learning. The content of this course is arranged such that student is completely understand why you study this course? and all those type of questions.. | who want to start learning. The | Content | of this course is arranged such | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Course content was very simple which helps a new-bee to get acquainted with python in an easy manner. Professor Chuck is also great. | Course | Content | was very simple which helps a | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Dr. Severance's way of explaining the simplest of things with immense enthusiasm and great examples can hold the attention of anyone- be it an experienced programmer or an absolute layman. I like how the entire course content is available for anyone under the Creative Commons, this can do wonders in imparting programming education in countries like mine. Also, he seems to be a cool teacher. | I like how the entire course | Content | is available for anyone under the | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course has fun lectures and very interesting bonus content. | fun lectures and very interesting bonus | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The quality of the content is excellent and is presented clearly (although the lecturer drinking various things throughout the lectures was odd...). I plowed through all seven weeks in a day because I had already finished the first three weeks of the Rice University Python course (also on Coursera); I would say this entire course is nearly equivalent to the first three weeks of the Rice course. My reasons for doing this are two-fold: (1) practice, practice, practice, and (2) I plan to take all four courses in this series from U Mich - I am interested in the web and database aspects that do not seem to be covered in the Rice course. I did learn a thing or two from each course that was not presented in the other, but those points were relatively minor and would probably be stumbled across on a future troubleshooting visit to stackoverflow. | The quality of the | Content | is excellent and is presented clearly | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Course can have more content and little complex assignments. | Course can have more | Content | and little complex assignments. | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 7gLccRnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Compared to the other Coursera course I attended ,this one is by far the least useful one. The instructor is super brief and his slides are mostly made of a list of acronyms! I would not recommend it until they make some serious changes to the content and presentation of material. | make some serious changes to the | Content | and presentation of material. | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 7gLccRnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Difficult to understand the video lectures at time but really useful content. Excellent further reading sections at the end of each module. | lectures at time but really useful | Content | Excellent further reading sections at the | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| 7gLccRnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Excellent content and references to additional materials. | Excellent | Content | and references to additional materials. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 7gLccRnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Content of the course is very good, useful and interesting, I greatly appreciate the knowledge delivered. But assignments could improve: -All module assignments seems mostly focalize on using Microstrategy tool. In assignments, i would like to see more exercises so that students learn through practice of business cases. For example, I prefer the way modules are organized in courses 1,2, and 3: concepts with examples, practice exercise, then assignment through similar exercise + a quiz. -In last assignment, there was no suggested solution(s) for the last question, i think this is missing for a good understanding. | | Content | of the course is very good, | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| 7Iw3cbCiEeS-qCIACimRTw | Wonderful presented, meaningful and rich content | Wonderful presented, meaningful and rich | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 7Iw3cbCiEeS-qCIACimRTw | brilliant content. this should be made a must for every employee and manager of a firm. | brilliant | Content | this should be made a must | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 7Iw3cbCiEeS-qCIACimRTw | Its been a good learning. The narration was to the point and the course content was thorough for the scope envisaged. Enjoyed it. More importantly it forces you to think !. so it's kind of interactive. Thank you very much. | to the point and the course | Content | was thorough for the scope envisaged. | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 7Iw3cbCiEeS-qCIACimRTw | A very interesting and enlightening course. Professor Brabandere has a unique way of explaining concepts and ideas that is not only clear but also sticks to the mind. The course contents are very fundamental yet application oriented. Highly recommended! | sticks to the mind. The course | Content | are very fundamental yet application oriented. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 7Iw3cbCiEeS-qCIACimRTw | I very much enjoyed Luc de Brabandere's presentation style and found the content stimulating. | Brabandere's presentation style and found the | Content | stimulating. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7jEat7ioEeWfYA612mWHZw | Awesome course. Content was delivered in a clear, concise, and precise manner. | Awesome course. | Content | was delivered in a clear, concise, | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 7jEat7ioEeWfYA612mWHZw | Well matured course that provides a great digest over a very complex topic and is a fantastic gateway to get started on the topic. Don't expect a terribly engaging set of presentations, but it is factually very useful and worth the time for those relatively new to the subject. I found the amount of content easy to handle on the side, while working full time. | subject. I found the amount of | Content | easy to handle on the side, | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 7jEat7ioEeWfYA612mWHZw | Great intro to the topic. Nice lecture content and presenters. Left me wanting more! I wish there was an advanced course as a follow up. | intro to the topic. Nice lecture | Content | and presenters. Left me wanting more! | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 7O843CBJEeWcQw5YiljpGw | The contents of this course are outstanding and represent the state of the art. Prospective learners will understand the basics of wind energy engineering, with special emphasis on wind measurements and resource assessment, aerodynamics, wind turbine technology, structural mechanics, materials, financial and electrical systems. | The | Content | of this course are outstanding and | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7pzdAYE3EeWb1w5ZMj87pw | One of the most fun Professors to watch who makes it very easy to follow with the course content | easy to follow with the course | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7pzdAYE3EeWb1w5ZMj87pw | Good content..but should also have some graded excercises | Good | Content | . but should also have some | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 7Sx79iWNEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | logical content and sweet voice | logical | Content | and sweet voice | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 7t9y531dEeWKYwric11Hpw | A good course, but not up to par with the first two. The content was far more theoretical and left me looking for applicable information. That said it was still a good course. | par with the first two. The | Content | was far more theoretical and left | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| 7t9y531dEeWKYwric11Hpw | the quality of this course is very low, and the content are not interesting and useful at all. | course is very low, and the | Content | are not interesting and useful at | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| 7vasMEd_EeW8cBKtDAegYw | Although I'm only the first week, there are two main comments I'd like to make. Firstly, why are the lectures sub-divided with the ridiculous, overlong, and irritating introduction for each section. In lesson one, this was repeated 11 times. What a waste of time! Secondly, the transcripts are in rich text, which is basically unreadable, has no line breaks, which makes reading the poems impossible, and the transcripts are poorly transcribed, making them illiterate. I feel I may not continue with the course for these reasons, even though the content is really interesting. This is the worst presented MOOC I have encountered.....I have completed 6, and am undertaking another 2, with edxcel and with futurelearn | for these reasons, even though the | Content | is really interesting. This is the | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| 7_kA050XEeWIXgpWJNgyEw | There are no lectures on Services, and Content Providers which are two key components of the Android system. It really disappointed me. | are no lectures on Services, and | Content | Providers which are two key components | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| 7_wUMCBSEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | For a introduction what is R and the initial functionality this course is excellent. I miss more content, I think even for a introductory course it could have more things to learn. | course is excellent. I miss more | Content | I think even for a introductory | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 82sYmnQ8EeWKsgrp3VnvAw | Very good audio and video quality. Explanations are very understandable and given with a lot of examples. Summaries and connections between the different content parts are provided regularly. | Summaries and connections between the different | Content | parts are provided regularly. | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| 82sYmnQ8EeWKsgrp3VnvAw | The course content was clearly and concisely taught. The professor expounded on concepts and gave applicable examples. The only suggestion that I would give is to provide downloadable slides in pdf format for each lecture video. | The course | Content | was clearly and concisely taught. The | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | This is a fantastic course with a lot of content. The presentation is very clear and engaging. The only downside is that the pace is sometimes quite fast. However, there are slides as supporting material which contain all the necessary details. Thanks for this wonderful course! | fantastic course with a lot of | Content | The presentation is very clear and | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | The content is amazing and is good to watch professors from outside the anglo world. | The | Content | is amazing and is good to | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Excellent content and very knowledgable | Excellent | Content | and very knowledgable | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Amazing course! Thank you very much, Stefano Caselli, for a such wonderful content and perfect presenting. I took a lot of very useful and practical information from it. I do appreciate it. Thanks! | Stefano Caselli, for a such wonderful | Content | and perfect presenting. I took a | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Outstanding content and instruction | Outstanding | Content | and instruction | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | The course is a good starting point for students who are interested in Private Equity. The content is rigorous and explore all the basic principles in different fields (tax, legal and financial issues). Therefore, I highly recommand this course. Many thanks professor Stefano Caselli, it was a good experience. | are interested in Private Equity. The | Content | is rigorous and explore all the | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 893hvnH8EeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | I thought the course was oldfashioned, it doesn't prepare you to be a journalist in the digital age, where terms like crowdfunding, search ability, new businessmodels, apps and social media are key factors of success. Yes, there was a small section where they explained crowdsourcing (lol) but interviewing as many people as you can seems to be cryptosaurus approach. Also the social media tips seem to be very interesting if you're 65+. It's worth following this course for free but definately not your money, the free course on futurelearn had ten times more content and I learned so much more... | on futurelearn had ten times more | Content | and I learned so much more. | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| 893hvnH8EeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | This course was a great follow up to the first one. Knowing where to go to find sources is very important. I was especially intrigued by the section on crowd-sourcing content. | intrigued by the section on crowd-sourcing | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 8G7jDCT-EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | It was awesome making my own game from start to finish, using all the knowledge I learned throughout all the courses in this specialisation, and also, seeing all the great content and ideas created by my classmates :) | and also, seeing all the great | Content | and ideas created by my classmates | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 8GTGgDxOEeWdUgozVKt3nw | Great Content!. | Great | Content | . | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 8GTGgDxOEeWdUgozVKt3nw | I really like the content of this course and the quality of the readings. The videos are intuitive and help you go through the most important concepts. I definitely recommend it! And big thank you to the teachers that delivered high standard course! | I really like the | Content | of this course and the quality | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 8GTGgDxOEeWdUgozVKt3nw | This is a rather pleasant course with a mix of advantages and disadvantages. For me, the advantages outweigh the negative sides. It slides on the surface of things, though, so don't expect to get too much 'in the know' after it. What I liked (and you might too) -> Short, visually engaging, clear in their purpose videos -> Interesting recommended/required literature/video content to solidify the concepts presented in the videos -> Comfortable layout of the transcripts so you can DL them and check them out as PDFs -> The course is focused on a very interesting, dynamic topic -- and lives up with a dynamic, fun and engaging approach What I didn't like that much -> Quizzes had some rather easy questions and as a whole weren't that serious. You can retake them -- you need to rely on your honesty to assess how much you've learned. -> The brisk nature of the videos is nice, but sometimes the narrative would jump from one point to another too abruptly. I still recommend the course for those who want to get their feet a little bit wet when it comes to innovation, digital affairs and basic entrepreneurship concepts. | purpose videos -> Interesting recommended/required literature/video | Content | to solidify the concepts presented in | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 8GTGgDxOEeWdUgozVKt3nw | Very good MOOC ; clear and quick with high quality contents and lessons. Thanks | clear and quick with high quality | Content | and lessons. Thanks | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 8GTGgDxOEeWdUgozVKt3nw | Amazing course! The best course I've taken at Coursera so far. Great lectures content + additional material with real world examples. | at Coursera so far. Great lectures | Content | + additional material with real world | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 8GTGgDxOEeWdUgozVKt3nw | This MOOC is just brilliant to catch up on the digital revolutions happening just now (organization, content). It gives the keys to understand and projet oneself, and also gives the users guide on how to innovate in this world. A MUST LEARN & SEE. THANKS A LOT FOR THIS! | digital revolutions happening just now (organization, | Content | It gives the keys to understand | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 8GTGgDxOEeWdUgozVKt3nw | My suggestions: ** videos: pace is way too fast, and without much visuals and a clear structure/plan, hard to fully grab in one view. I don't think your 5mn max duration really makes sense. When the content is of interest, better to make it longer to improve clarity. Positive: you provide written/text versions of your videos. ** support documents: way too many and not always relevant ** quizzes: i don't think that asking us the name of a founder etc. really test anything about our understanding of our lesson. Too many irrelevant questions. All in all, it seems you applied one of the rules you discuss in this course: release fast, and adjust later on based on customers' feedback.. Unsure this is the right approach when it comes to online learning. I had higher expectations vs. Mines Telecom. | duration really makes sense. When the | Content | is of interest, better to make | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| 8GTGgDxOEeWdUgozVKt3nw | Awesome vidéos and great content | Awesome vidéos and great | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 8H8wFp3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | Great content! My only suggestion would be a more in-depth course over a 2 or 3 month period (with the price adjusted accordingly). | Great | Content | My only suggestion would be a | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 8K9bbo2MEeWeogpSJNat4w | This course is full of "real world" applications for Virtual K-12 teachers. It allows teachers at almost every level of technology literacy to begin to use some aspects of virtual education as a means to engaging students in lesson content goals. | means to engaging students in lesson | Content | goals. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 8K9bbo2MEeWeogpSJNat4w | most of it you can't do unless you pay for it. - not sure I can even click 'complete' for the course. so not really a MOOC. - no option for collaboration. Videos had useful content about 50% of the. Week 4 resources was by far the best and most useful. | option for collaboration. Videos had useful | Content | about 50% of the. Week 4 | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | This is a great course and a daring venture for what is really an art form, beyond it's scientific requirements. This part of the specialization needs a little refinement. I posted this in the discussion forum. · 7 days ago · Edited First of all.....these guys running this data science department have their hands full. They are teaching live classes for students who have spent OODLES (lots) of money to attend this prestigious college . Johns Hopkins is about as good as it gets for a medical degree. Then they are doing experiments and other data science for the research division of Johns Hopkins which is also as good as it gets........THEN they are doing these MOOC courses on top of all their other responsibilities......Dr. Leek is a University of Washington Alumni, which is also top notch for Data Science. The video lesson is flawed, there is no denying it. But I must say these teachers are very open to improvement in the course and your comments on what could be better done are received and acted upon, so I would include them in your thank you letter to the teachers. ALSO I think these MOOC courses are best done by all members of the department contributing. Truly this field IS a team sport. I feel this course was good, but the videos need to be edited and scripted, so unnecessary language, which dilutes the core knowledge, that must be learned, is not diluted where questions are left in the students head about content when being tested. I learned long ago in a college calculus class that if your mark isn't perfect, it's OK, so long as you pass with a high score......even if it is the teachers fault. The course could use better video production with teleprompter scripting......maybe some AV students at Johns Hopkins could get on board. it will happen eventually I'm sure. You want to take a course that is absolutely one of the best courses I've taken anywhere and truly the best online. Try the number one business course on Coursera: GROW TO GREATNESS, either part 1 or 2, University of Virginia, Darden School Of Business...........A team created course with one helluva a teacher who is a business person, researcher and award-winning writer. I would recommend this course to ANY student and especially E-Teachers. The problem with this course is that there is a lot of information that can be included but may not be absolutely necessary as a "core concept". Needless to say, the more technical skills any employee has, the more insight they will have into their teammate's skills, as well, as the overall mission of the data department and the business it serves. I'm more of a tech and infrastructure person, I'm not real passionate about coding. I find it tedious. The more I learn about it, the more I enjoy it, albeit, from a distance. I can't see myself creating great blocks of scripts, but the more I know about how they are created AND what rules the code in a project must abide by, the better my skills will be as a data center manager. So I'm trying to learn as much as possible about R, Python, and companion programs like ggvis for creating visualizations. I'd say visualizations are an essential skill for a data manager, since you have to present results and projects, questions, and answers to higher ups and other departments. this link comes from the resource section of this course: https://www.datacamp.com/courses/ggvis-data-visualization-r-tutorial This link or URL is of much more value to me, than a flawed test question and a reduction in my 100 percent average in the specialization. Without this lesson, in this course, I would not have this valuable resource. Another great link, which has a great FREE print publication as well: http://www.processor.com/ ...these people have been advising data center managers longer than just about anybody ! Verbally and in the transcript are some nebulous statements that point toward the main idea, that concept being: the more any employee, on any data science or technical team member IS, a "jack of all trades", the better. So that could have been included in some more general way on the quiz, because really that is pretty much a general rule, I've found, working in ANY capacity in the tech industry. I have done a great deal of audio editing, working at numerous radio stations, with Adobe Audition. With others like: Pro Tools, or any other really good quality AV digital editor the result is streamlined, near seamless, audio-video, or one or the other. You just learn how to read and edit wave forms of all kinds. Years ago, in Dallas, Texas, attending Richland College. I learned a valuable lesson. I was taking a college level Calc-Trig math class being taught by the regular professor's WIFE. I don't know if the professor was sick, but this woman, who was teaching the class for the whole semester, frankly, was not qualified. I had always been considered an illiterate by my high school math teachers, a married couple who, frankly, were highly abnormal even on the geekiest scale. These people were acting like they were a world above most people in the class. Needless to say, I assumed, by their "adult" opinions, they were sent by God Himself, to educate me thru denigration. I was amazed, how 10 years later, in College math how well I was doing. I was carrying a 100 percent average ! So midterm this faux professor declares, "I'll be prefiguring all the arithmetic to be easy, so you won't have to bring your calculators !" SO I DIDN'T.......and of course the teacher's wife proclaims....."I didn't have time to make the arithmetic easy so you'd better use your calculators !" I literally had pages and pages of figuring in handwriting accompanying my 3 page test. The result was a C plus on the test. I angrily told the sub teacher "I did not bring a calculator to this test because you said it wouldn't be necessary, therefore I must be allowed to redo this test with a calculator !" She of course relented, "No that won't be possible...that's not a bad grade...." she continued, "what are you worried about ?"........ I was so peeved, I was going to drop the class. It was too late in the semester, and I was so disgusted with this woman's cavalier dismissal of my perfect grade that I just stopped going to class. The result was a failing final grade. Who ultimately suffered from this dilemma ? That, albeit, unfairly was me.....who created this "academic" tragedy, by the aggravation of a deeply flawed situation. Once again, that would be me. | left in the students head about | Content | when being tested. I learned long | Negative | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Interesting, but content is a bit limited | Interesting, but | Content | is a bit limited | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | This is a great course for helping you decide where you fit in the data science domain. The content is very clear, informative and have definite suggestions and conclusions. Unlike most of the information available on this topic, which mostly says that you need to be a unicorn to be in this space, this course talks sense, divides scope, suggests achievable targets and you can plan and assess rationally. Also Jeff is a classic teacher,it's always rewarding to listen to him whatever be the topic. | in the data science domain. The | Content | is very clear, informative and have | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 8om3I-4LEeSbxyIACw0OOQ | Great Course. Unlike other MOOC courses, it provides sufficent practices which helps me to understand the content a lot. Looking forward to take part B | which helps me to understand the | Content | a lot. Looking forward to take | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 8om3I-4LEeSbxyIACw0OOQ | Impressive Course!!! Dan is a very smart, passionate, responsible teacher, eager to enlighten us with his thoughts on PL. Though the course might seem quite hard to novice programmers, the gain on learning the contents in this course is rather huge. In this course, you will learn functional programming style, some programming paradigms that are already or expectedly prevalent and a good taste of general programming languages! You should not miss it! | programmers, the gain on learning the | Content | in this course is rather huge. | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 8TKORJrSEeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | Course in not only just about theory of cyber security .But also ,It also accommodates psychological view to cyber world . This makes it more interesting .The brief part of law related to cyber security buttress the content maturity .However, More information on privacy should be added .If done ,course is a 5 star Course .Moreover, every lecture gives information.So, efficiently crafted out of course .Overall,it's worth taking and worth time spending | related to cyber security buttress the | Content | maturity . However, More information on | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 8TKORJrSEeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | The course content was great but delivery was a little dry. Appears that the presenters were reading from a teleprompter - sort of awkward. | The course | Content | was great but delivery was a | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 8To4DTVtEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The content has a very good breadth component(covering json response handling,core data and push notifications.The very important components of iOS).All of them have been handled in suitable depth.Professor Don Patterson's diction and style of teaching is great. As I'm currently working as an iOS engineer, it is helping me a lot in expanding my skills. | The | Content | has a very good breadth component(covering | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | Grate Course content and very well explained. | Grate Course | Content | and very well explained. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | The assignments are challenging and well balanced. The extra provided code adds a good opportunity to see how professional programmers code and the course videos explain all the content clearly and in an organized fashion. Overall, the course is made easy through the videos and the assignments do well to compel good and continuous practice. | the course videos explain all the | Content | clearly and in an organized fashion. | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | Awesome content, all the requiered foundations for the real beginning in the Android world. | Awesome | Content | all the requiered foundations for the | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | Content was good. But organization could have been better. Assignments and auto-grader had issues and the problem statements were modified during the course. | | Content | was good. But organization could have | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | Good course. First time enrolled course in Coursera. I really enjoyed it. Lots of quiz and weekly assignment kept me busy for 4 weeks. And because of these ( assignment due date), i really learned by forcing myself to complete all in time. Quite tough on week 3, and i watched the videos multiple times and google the subject in order to understand the contents. Take this course, and struggle for 4 weeks. Will not regret. | subject in order to understand the | Content | Take this course, and struggle for | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | I liked the course contents, but in my opinion the slides should be more modern, and the main idea in each lesson should get more highlight, and the ideas to retain too. | I liked the course | Content | but in my opinion the slides | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | i gave this course 1 star not because its bad in content, its just because i was expecting more due to the fact it has been delayed several times; then when it finally came it was like any other youtube or online tutorial. i was expecting something as big as udacity but unfortunately its not. Don't expect to know or understand java with this course, no practical or step by step example in this course. what makes it worst is the fact they never show you how to build an app from scratch while the only app they have in this course, they dont do it. you have to do it on your own. dont get me wrong. all of them are good instructors but the way they did it, its definitely is not a beginner friendly. give a calculator as an assignment to build while you never built one app in this course, i think its not an effective way to teach. i will not pay for this specialization. i will do the udacity nanodegree one | star not because its bad in | Content | its just because i was expecting | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | The content is very rich! | The | Content | is very rich! | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 93w6xNzBEeSvjyIAC3jXcg | I really like the content, the instructors talk about the very recent research. | I really like the | Content | the instructors talk about the very | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 93w6xNzBEeSvjyIAC3jXcg | Course content was very good and I'd highly recommend this class. However the course policy of getting other students to grade the assignments results in people with big egos assigning other students arbitrarily bad grades. Maybe this can be fixed on the next iteration. Otherwise, bravo. | Course | Content | was very good and I'd highly | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 93w6xNzBEeSvjyIAC3jXcg | The content was amazing, i can't be happier with what i learnt. Thanks for sharing all of that knowledge! As an opportunity area, i would say it was hard to follow some of the speakers because they spoke monotonous, the content was very dense and perhaps in those cases some graphic content in the video could help. Thank you, great course, great project! | The | Content | was amazing, i can't be happier | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 93w6xNzBEeSvjyIAC3jXcg | The content was amazing, i can't be happier with what i learnt. Thanks for sharing all of that knowledge! As an opportunity area, i would say it was hard to follow some of the speakers because they spoke monotonous, the content was very dense and perhaps in those cases some graphic content in the video could help. Thank you, great course, great project! | speakers because they spoke monotonous, the | Content | was very dense and perhaps in | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 93w6xNzBEeSvjyIAC3jXcg | The content was amazing, i can't be happier with what i learnt. Thanks for sharing all of that knowledge! As an opportunity area, i would say it was hard to follow some of the speakers because they spoke monotonous, the content was very dense and perhaps in those cases some graphic content in the video could help. Thank you, great course, great project! | perhaps in those cases some graphic | Content | in the video could help. Thank | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| 94jQ-3EnEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | In depth and practical. Some more linking to the previous courses could provide better framing of the courses content in the larger scheme. For a more systemic view of how all things are connected in this course and all previous courses I would have to go deep into it all again. As this was my first acquaintance with such a course | provide better framing of the courses | Content | in the larger scheme. For a | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 9a6pC3gcEeWxvQr3acyajw | This course was challenging and informative. The ability to speed up and slow down the video lectures is fantastic. These video lectures are jammed packed with information and I often listen to parts again and again to grasp a solid understanding. Without this feature this would become tedious and boring. The lecturers are knowledgeable and the words chosen to explain the content are spot on. Thanks. Loved it. | the words chosen to explain the | Content | are spot on. Thanks. Loved it. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 9a6pC3gcEeWxvQr3acyajw | Amazing teacher, wonderful content - incredibly recommended! | Amazing teacher, wonderful | Content | - incredibly recommended! | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| 9h_j5XEiEeWbbw5cIAKQrw | Great course! I especially loved the content about localization. | Great course! I especially loved the | Content | about localization. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 9h_j5XEiEeWbbw5cIAKQrw | This was by far the worst course in the series. There is a lot of good content in this course that needs to be shared, but I just felt the delivery failed in a lot of ways. Here are some issues 1) Often, concepts are thrown out but aren't explained clearly. Speaker glosses over them without giving concrete examples 2) The structure of the course is poorly configured. On several occasions, inline quizzes test you on concepts that haven't been introduced until later in the video, forcing you to guess at answers. Also, the assignment portion of the course asks you to submit a word or pdf with images, but it wasn't configured to allow uploads. You could only submit text in a text box. I realized I wasn't the only person with the issue when I graded assignments from others who had trouble submitting their assignment. In some cases, I believe students failed that portion of the course because they could not figure out how to submit. I have some IT background and was able to share my homework through my shared drive fortunately. 3) The speaker should re-record his lecture. It was obvious (or at least seemed as if) he was reading a teleprompter. There were many awkward pauses between sentences that made it hard to listen to. Often times, the audio presentation were inconsistent with the words in the slide, making it confusing because I didn't know which I should be following. | There is a lot of good | Content | in this course that needs to | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | Contents were short and great but some tools and practicle s/w should be introduced in it. | | Content | were short and great but some | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | articulation needs to be improved, talked too fast, content doesn't give much | to be improved, talked too fast, | Content | doesn't give much | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | Very poor content. Everything is already said in last courses in this specialization. Also they didnt gave any techniques or tips how to easier create game worlds | Very poor | Content | Everything is already said in last | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | Great content and great assignments ! | Great | Content | and great assignments ! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | The course is fun but the content is too general. I like to know more methods and technics to develop a game world, considering genres, mechanics and gameplay options. | The course is fun but the | Content | is too general. I like to | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | Useful but as with the first course of the specialization very light on content | of the specialization very light on | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | I had good assignments, but less content than I expected. | I had good assignments, but less | Content | than I expected. | Negative | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | Great teacher, great videos, great staff, this course, and CalArts course in general, know how to create great learning content that engages and promotes learning, there is never a second when I'm thinking "man, when is this going to end?". | know how to create great learning | Content | that engages and promotes learning, there | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| a0fzUULWEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | shame you have to pay for this course although the content is good | pay for this course although the | Content | is good | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| a0fzUULWEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Great content! Very interesting course and well explained and organized. thanks! | Great | Content | Very interesting course and well explained | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| a0fzUULWEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | excellent course, content and professor. Very enlightening material delivered very digestibly. | excellent course, | Content | and professor. Very enlightening material delivered | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| a0fzUULWEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | excellent course in terms of contents and information. simple and well presented. | excellent course in terms of | Content | and information. simple and well presented. | Positive | 0.9 | 4.0 |
| a0fzUULWEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | I like how the lectures are delivered. It is very engaging, and the content has been very useful. Level of details is also good for me. | It is very engaging, and the | Content | has been very useful. Level of | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Interesting course but: 1) The transcripts for each week are appalling. Here is a copied and pasted example: "Separatist groups remained active in almost 90% of decapitation cases where only a third of ideologically ideological organizations such as left wing and right wing organizations. Are damaged by it. And then, in general, in 17% of the cases. So 7% of the cases, decapitation led to the collapse of an organization." How are those that are hearing impaired meant to understand what the course leader is communicating? It took me so long to understand the transcript that I may as well have listened instead. The subtitles option reads the same as the transcript - not much good for anyone with anything but perfect hearing. 2) The estimated timings for each activity are somewhat optimistic. '10 minutes' is the recommended reading time for each week's reading content. Within this reading list are, on average, 8 articles, some of which amount to over 70 pages - if each article is roughly 25-40 pages on average, and there are around 8 articles, how will this reading activity take the student only '10 minutes' to complete? Apart from that, I did really enjoy the course!! | reading time for each week's reading | Content | Within this reading list are, on | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Excellent content and lecture! | Excellent | Content | and lecture! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Very dense yet exciting content. | Very dense yet exciting | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Excellent content and nicely delivered. Would have liked some more variation in the delivery - show us videos, problems to solve, more details for example on Munich massacre - detailed deconstruction of the act of terror. Found it difficult with the tests that involved "check all that apply". Recommended course. | Excellent | Content | and nicely delivered. Would have liked | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Very compelling arguments and facts. I was looking for something to do and always enjoy broadening knowledge. The content was heavy enough to be meaningful, but light enough to be enjoyable. I enjoyed the discussion forums. I will be continuing the series. | and always enjoy broadening knowledge. The | Content | was heavy enough to be meaningful, | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Theoretically the course is very lacking. There is little focus on the scholarly work in the field except perhaps the first few lectures. The content and scope of the course is too small. Overall however the content is good for a very basic introduction and | perhaps the first few lectures. The | Content | and scope of the course is | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Theoretically the course is very lacking. There is little focus on the scholarly work in the field except perhaps the first few lectures. The content and scope of the course is too small. Overall however the content is good for a very basic introduction and | is too small. Overall however the | Content | is good for a very basic | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Average. Doesn't really like the Professor's style. He spends too many time trying to explain that he feels really concern about the victims etc. I feel that the content of the class could have been interesting but the organization was messy. Finally it gives the impression that academics know barely anything about the subject. I would have prefer a more historical approach. Overall i've watched all the content but in the future i won't spend much time checking for new Mooc from him. Thanks for the try though | victims etc. I feel that the | Content | of the class could have been | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Average. Doesn't really like the Professor's style. He spends too many time trying to explain that he feels really concern about the victims etc. I feel that the content of the class could have been interesting but the organization was messy. Finally it gives the impression that academics know barely anything about the subject. I would have prefer a more historical approach. Overall i've watched all the content but in the future i won't spend much time checking for new Mooc from him. Thanks for the try though | approach. Overall i've watched all the | Content | but in the future i won't | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Good fist MOOC experience. Pity the google hangout wasn't up but never mind. Would prefer more questions in the videos to check I'm listening attentively. Would also like to see a list of all the reading material in one place rather than per lectiure. Then I can go to each web page and save as epub usiing the crhome dotepub extension and copy to my ereader. Anyway you can streamline that kind of admin task would be appreciated. You ought to spruke ways to read the web pages, because reading it on a laptop or even tablet is a bit tedious. Also with the PDFs, some info on saving them as resizable PDFs would be appreciated. Course content was good and I like the coursera front end. Need someway to manage tthe growing library of reading material that accumalates not just with this one course but if you do multiple MOOCs over time, Thank! | resizable PDFs would be appreciated. Course | Content | was good and I like the | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Great contents and better professor | Great | Content | and better professor | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | It was a good course, however, it seems that the recording was from the earlier course. Which I don't mind, however, some of the comment wasn't relevant, so it was a bit weird. In terms of content and how the course run, it was beyond my expectation. The list of literature provided were quite extesive and strategicaly chosen. I wish there's a whole syllabus that we can access in the beginning of the course to prepare for the assignment. | a bit weird. In terms of | Content | and how the course run, it | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | I have learned a lot since the very beginning of this course, i found very accurate the content in each module, and i should mention that profesor Bakker is very objective at explaining, and when it comes to sharing his opinions he gives reasonable arguments. | course, i found very accurate the | Content | in each module, and i should | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | A very good and thought provoking course. It is a re-run of an archived course and sadly a number of reference materials that had been on the dashboard are not reposted with it. Also there are references to discussion forums that don't exist. If the missing material and content were up to date it would be a strong and complete course. | exist. If the missing material and | Content | were up to date it would | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Incredible and very useful content made in a very good estructure. | Incredible and very useful | Content | made in a very good estructure. | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | 3 stars for the content and the fourth stars because the way the instructor presented it was amusing. | 3 stars for the | Content | and the fourth stars because the | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Enjoyed the course Kimberley. You made it fun and informative and I used the content to make a slew of changes! I had a real distilling of exactly where I am going with my brand and I'm off on this adventure of creating it now. Can I convince you to do a course ORM through Coursera? | and informative and I used the | Content | to make a slew of changes! | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | excellent content, supported by the fact it is supported by Prof Jonahs book, and some excellent on line essays /blogs & applications of the ideas he recounts. Very memorably presented. Pithy & relevant. | excellent | Content | supported by the fact it is | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Great communicator! Just it needs more content. I already knew most of the things! However I have enjoyed. Congrats! | Great communicator! Just it needs more | Content | I already knew most of the | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Great instructor! Very good content and reference readings. I only wish the course wouldn't be so introductory. | Great instructor! Very good | Content | and reference readings. I only wish | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Excellent teacher. Very well recorded videos. Good lectures and nice content. It changes the way how you see your life (personal and professional aspects). Congratulations. I recommend to all. | recorded videos. Good lectures and nice | Content | It changes the way how you | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Amazing content! I learned so much during this course. The instructor is absolutely awesome, my favorite on Coursera so far. | Amazing | Content | I learned so much during this | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Great content, engaged and energetic professor made the material fun. Worthwhile course! | Great | Content | engaged and energetic professor made the | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| A2RSXymKEeWJTQ5-ju9xSw | The course content is great, but peer evaluation is simply useless and almost random. This specialisation needs to introduce an actual final assessment by an actual expert, not peers. | The course | Content | is great, but peer evaluation is | Positive | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Excellent course and good content | Excellent course and good | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Excellent course, very professionally produced. Great content delivered by engaging lecturers. One of my favourite courses to date. | Excellent course, very professionally produced. Great | Content | delivered by engaging lecturers. One of | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Very good content, videos, rich content, up-to-date subjects. Highly recommended. | Very good | Content | videos, rich content, up-to-date subjects. Highly | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Very good content, videos, rich content, up-to-date subjects. Highly recommended. | Very good content, videos, rich | Content | up-to-date subjects. Highly recommended. | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | it May be called Foundations to Business But it is way rich in content and i do appreciate. looking forward to the next programme. i will sure enroll. | But it is way rich in | Content | and i do appreciate. looking forward | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | THE COURSE CONTAIN CONTENTS THAT ARE PRACTICABLE AND THOROUGHLY RESEARCH. THANK YOU. I HOPE TO APPLY FOR A CERTIFICATE SOON. | THE COURSE CONTAIN | Content | THAT ARE PRACTICABLE AND THOROUGHLY RESEARCH. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Excellent contents.. Good speed. Evaluation was challenging but not too strict... Looking forward to more courses on Coursera. | Excellent | Content | . Good speed. Evaluation was challenging | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | It covered all the concepts with examples and the quiz content further improved the understanding. | concepts with examples and the quiz | Content | further improved the understanding. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Highly focused and objective stuff.Course content is exhaustive and highly relevant.prof Harris and Prof Lenox the main architects of this course are excellent with their delivery and modulation.the whole learning process was fun and enjoyable.Many thanks to other support staff as well. | Highly focused and objective stuff. Course | Content | is exhaustive and highly relevant. prof | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Amazing instructors, very appreciate their input and explanations by typing it on the system. Very well thought and excellent material content. | Very well thought and excellent material | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Great course! From the lucid, well presented content, it is a joy for a beginner as well as a seasoned programmer to take home something from this course. Please do bring out an extended version dedicated to image processing, signal processing which MATLAB mainly covers :) | course! From the lucid, well presented | Content | it is a joy for a | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Homework assignments are much more difficult and time-consuming than the contents of the lectures, especially for the last three weeks. Fortunately, the tutors are very patient and respond to your questions quickly. | more difficult and time-consuming than the | Content | of the lectures, especially for the | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | This is the only one course, I have paid for certificate. I liked most of the course. Instructor has a unique way of teaching Matlab. He started Matlab basics. After that, he had shown functions. The reason of showing functions at the very first times was to evaluate the problems. I am so surprised when I have seen the usage of column operator in such different ways. Course was followed by decision structures, loops, strings and file I/O. The course content was well prepared. Video lectures are quite helpful. Especially, 1 hour problem solving example video was so beneficial. However, at the end of the course, problems become quite challenging and time consuming. In first 6 problem set, my success rate was 100%. But, in last two week's problems I was able to solve only 5 of 8. The problems become difficult to understand, there were not enough explanations or hints. Discussion pages were not useful some times. I had to make further research on internet to understand the problem and it was time consuming. In the new version of the course, it would be better if problems are clear to understand. In short, the Instructors and Mentors did great job. Do I suggest this course to anyone else? The answer is definitely YES! Thank you. | strings and file I/O. The course | Content | was well prepared. Video lectures are | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | The assignments´assessments are really smartly set up and help tracking the content of the course by practising yourself | set up and help tracking the | Content | of the course by practising yourself | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | great course. It is easy for me, a new man, to understand these basic content. Thank Coursera. | new man, to understand these basic | Content | Thank Coursera. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Very good course, with clear explanations of the key concepts. However, I felt hindered in being able to complete all tasks in the homeworks each week as many questions alienate someone like me with little mathematics/physics background. I feel if the questions were more general I would have been able to perform better each week. Very good lecture content though. | better each week. Very good lecture | Content | though. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| A82QaHtJEeSliSIAC0EO7A | Great course. Most of the content was relevant to my career. | Great course. Most of the | Content | was relevant to my career. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Really horrible in instruction, experience and application ability of lecturers, poorly put together and assembled. It was astonishing to experience such self-promoting hacks rather than knowledgeable practitioners of the art of meditation. It is very important to clarify the content of a somewhat titled misnomer. The course was an academic study in mediation bring is rather esoteric, questionable, and personal opinion concepts and comments; in effect a mesh-mash. | is very important to clarify the | Content | of a somewhat titled misnomer. The | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I am very disappointed about the content. It is not a course. Pr David Germano is just reading text. No design no learning experience. I would learn much better with just reading a book. It is a shame I was very interested in the subject. | I am very disappointed about the | Content | It is not a course. Pr | Negative | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | This course was one of the most useful of my undergraduate and graduate career. I have been a long time Buddhist practitioner, primarily in the Zen tradition and found it difficult to integrate, both in my own practice and through understanding popular literature. This course provided much of the intellectual background that I have wanted for a long time. I am particularly interested in the discussion of Buddhist Meditation as a religious vs. secular practice, and the cultural content of the various practices one encounters. David Germano's lectures are incredibly information dense. I learned to download the transcript and outline and highlight them as well as listen to the audio. Now I wouldn't cut out a thing. I particularly appreciate the many guest lectures, interviews and guided meditation sessions. All of my questions are not yet answered but I have some clearer understanding and ideas for moving forward. | vs. secular practice, and the cultural | Content | of the various practices one encounters. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The course gives multi-dimensional (traditional, scientific, research) perspective about Buddhist philosophy, primarily on meditation. A highly self-contained course, content completeness is remarkable. A systematic description of various type meditations is high appreciated. | on meditation. A highly self-contained course, | Content | completeness is remarkable. A systematic description | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Great content - learned a lot. Would be easier to follow if David's lectures would be presented more accessible - not read in a monotone voice. | Great | Content | - learned a lot. Would be | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Very nice course, it varies a lot with the content so many different angles are mentioned. | it varies a lot with the | Content | so many different angles are mentioned. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The course was a very comprehensive introduction to Buddhist Meditation: - there were lectures about the different Buddhist meditation traditions - practical trainings on Buddhist meditation - neurological and psychological view on the effects of meditation on the human body and many more topics related to meditation. I found the course was actually overloaded with content: most videos were too long and there were too many videos. Some videos were more like reading a text: the lecturer was most likely reading his own script from a Teleprompter instead of really talking to the audience. The videos were not bad, but I see some room for improvement for most videos of most lecturers. My favourite videos were from Anam Thubten, he was most genuine and convincing to me. All in all it was still an excellent introduction into the topic for me: a big thank you to all people involved, you did a great job!! | the course was actually overloaded with | Content | most videos were too long and | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | This course contains a balanced content of meditation practice and scientific studies on the topic. I enjoyed the content and delivery of the course. The course helped me understand the structure and organization of the Buddhist teachings. Looking forward to the next courses. N.B: First few sessions might seem a bit slow and boring. My suggestion is to be patient and not drop out, great material will come afterwards. | This course contains a balanced | Content | of meditation practice and scientific studies | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | This course contains a balanced content of meditation practice and scientific studies on the topic. I enjoyed the content and delivery of the course. The course helped me understand the structure and organization of the Buddhist teachings. Looking forward to the next courses. N.B: First few sessions might seem a bit slow and boring. My suggestion is to be patient and not drop out, great material will come afterwards. | on the topic. I enjoyed the | Content | and delivery of the course. The | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Good content. MIght want to change up the presentations for variety - add visual aids, etc. | Good | Content | MIght want to change up the | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | (I posted this review in a blog [https://guhyasamajacenter.wordpress.com/2015/10/03/review-of-the-free-coursera-tibetan-buddhist-meditation-and-the-modern-world-lesser-vehicle-course-given-by-uva/]. Much of the courseware was outstanding. Many of the videos were so poorly done (boring) that I couldn't watch them. (I do not watch people read prepared text in a video. Ever.) ----------- From the blog ---------------------------------- I recently took the FREE Coursera course, "Tibetan Buddhist Meditation and the Modern World". (https://www.coursera.org/learn/buddhist-meditation) From the course catalog: " Tibetan Buddhist Meditation and the Modern World explores the immense variety of meditation practices past and present. We present their histories, their philosophical underpinnings, their transformations in the modern global world, and we give you a chance to reflect upon meditation practices through secular contemplations designed just for this course." (Note: In the class overview, it is noted that the term "Lesser Vehicle" is "perjorative" but they use it anyway. ??") There are many FREE reasons to take this FREE "Lesser Vehicle" course (the first of four): #1 - An awesome, wonderful hour-long interview with Sharon Salzberg, one of the founders of the Insight Meditation Society. What an awesome lady. I was not aware that she is also a Dzogchen student. (Did I mention it was FREE?) Worth signing up for the course just to skip to Week 6 to watch this interview. #2 - Guided Meditations by Dr. Anne Klein and Anam Thubten. Very, very, very nice. FREE, it's ALL FREE. #3 - The Science of Mindfulness against the Background of the Scientific Study of Meditation videos with Dr. Clifford Saron, neuroscientist. His videos start in Week 1 and continue through Week 6 in building a basis for understanding the scientific research on meditation. He (and the course) demonstrates what can and cannot (presently) be scientifically proven about meditation. One excellent example: Two trained pianists were told to learn a complicated piece of music, one with the piano, and the other only in his imagination. After 2 weeks (I think) of practice, their brains' MRI patterns exhibited almost the exact same changes. Dr. Saron noted that the results are not definitive but still may have implications for the compassion/bodhicitta meditations we do. #4: An interview on "Buddhist Modernism", with David McMahan. Very much academic-oriented. One statement, in particular, struck me since, the more I think about it, the more I think it might be true: "The Buddhist Tantra teachings are not accepted nor are they popular in the West." For all the Buddhist monastics that visit the USA and the West to grab donations and go back to their home countries, few of them are sticking around to teach complete Tantra classes. The few that do (and do it well) are having a hard time making ends meet. (That's just my opinion, I guess.) There are also short 5-10 minute interviews with Khenpo Tsultrim Lodro (a short "snapshot" of the Tibetan take on the week's particular subject, which was often better (to me) than the 90min-long "talking head" version ) and Ven. Tsoknyi Rinpoche ("How does Buddhism change in a New Culture" and "Benefits and Dangers of Secularing Buddhism", the TB rebuttal, as it were. He did note that motivation is the key. Bad agenda = bad results, good motivation will cause good results.) Have I noted the course is FREE? So you can take the course, and the following courses, without doing any of the assignments/quizzes. Watch (or download) any video or transcript to your heart's content whenever you wish in any order you wish. (That assumes the courses are not taken off-line at a future date.) Further in the course description is a blurb that may point to at least 3 future courses in "Mahāyāna, …Vajrayāna, …and a fourth vehicle, which is explicit in many Tibetan materials, though no standard term ever emerged that was accepted by all sectarian traditions - we will thus term it as the “Natural Vehicle” or “Post Tantra”." If the quality of guided meditations (GM) in following classes are even half the quality of this course's GM's, then that's all the reason I need to continue the future classes, too. Course gotchas: #1. That said (other shoe dropping here), the other half of the course was videos of people reading their prepared academic papers, in monotone or semi-monotone voices. (Transcripts are available. I figure I can read a paper in 5% of the time someone else reads it to me in a video. Ugh.) However, they would probably need the voice of Morgan Freeman, James Earl Jones, B. Cumberbatch or James Spader to keep me awake. To be fair, the content is golden, although the papers seems to be geared to the academic community, rather than the student community. Books and Videos on these subjects are all over Amazon, YouTube, FPMT, Dharma-Documentaries, etc. #2. The Sharon Salzberg (SS), in her interview, brought up an excellent point. She noted that she and a noted clinical psychology (CP) scientist (researcher) (whose name I have forgotten) were at a conference where the issue on the table was that someone was having trouble with "loving kindness" meditation as a first meditation class. SS noted that she would instantly recommend the student change to "calm abiding" meditation whereas the CP could not change that student's meditation technique to another technique (such as calm abiding) as her research findings would then be invalid. Similarly, many of the non-Buddhist guided meditations that I viewed in this course felt like a physical education or "How To" class. Do this. Do that. It did not feel as though they lived the material, just taught it. (Whereas it was patently obvious Dr. Klein & Anam Thubten were definitely "walking the walk", so to speak, so were able to speak from the heart.) Interviews I did not watch, that may be of great interest to others, include meditation in the school system by Tish Jennings, meditation in the Business Community (an interview with David Mick), the Burmese meditation tradition in an interview with Erik Braun, the MBSR (Meditation Based Stress Reduction) with Susan Bauer-Wu, and meditation in the legal community with Rhonda Magee. And all that is just the first course. Many of it's "failings" may just be my karmic opinions. The course is worth checking out and watching/reading/meditating on those parts that interest you. In that respect, the breadth of the course content is quite nice and so well done. Grade: B-. | video or transcript to your heart's | Content | whenever you wish in any order | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | (I posted this review in a blog [https://guhyasamajacenter.wordpress.com/2015/10/03/review-of-the-free-coursera-tibetan-buddhist-meditation-and-the-modern-world-lesser-vehicle-course-given-by-uva/]. Much of the courseware was outstanding. Many of the videos were so poorly done (boring) that I couldn't watch them. (I do not watch people read prepared text in a video. Ever.) ----------- From the blog ---------------------------------- I recently took the FREE Coursera course, "Tibetan Buddhist Meditation and the Modern World". (https://www.coursera.org/learn/buddhist-meditation) From the course catalog: " Tibetan Buddhist Meditation and the Modern World explores the immense variety of meditation practices past and present. We present their histories, their philosophical underpinnings, their transformations in the modern global world, and we give you a chance to reflect upon meditation practices through secular contemplations designed just for this course." (Note: In the class overview, it is noted that the term "Lesser Vehicle" is "perjorative" but they use it anyway. ??") There are many FREE reasons to take this FREE "Lesser Vehicle" course (the first of four): #1 - An awesome, wonderful hour-long interview with Sharon Salzberg, one of the founders of the Insight Meditation Society. What an awesome lady. I was not aware that she is also a Dzogchen student. (Did I mention it was FREE?) Worth signing up for the course just to skip to Week 6 to watch this interview. #2 - Guided Meditations by Dr. Anne Klein and Anam Thubten. Very, very, very nice. FREE, it's ALL FREE. #3 - The Science of Mindfulness against the Background of the Scientific Study of Meditation videos with Dr. Clifford Saron, neuroscientist. His videos start in Week 1 and continue through Week 6 in building a basis for understanding the scientific research on meditation. He (and the course) demonstrates what can and cannot (presently) be scientifically proven about meditation. One excellent example: Two trained pianists were told to learn a complicated piece of music, one with the piano, and the other only in his imagination. After 2 weeks (I think) of practice, their brains' MRI patterns exhibited almost the exact same changes. Dr. Saron noted that the results are not definitive but still may have implications for the compassion/bodhicitta meditations we do. #4: An interview on "Buddhist Modernism", with David McMahan. Very much academic-oriented. One statement, in particular, struck me since, the more I think about it, the more I think it might be true: "The Buddhist Tantra teachings are not accepted nor are they popular in the West." For all the Buddhist monastics that visit the USA and the West to grab donations and go back to their home countries, few of them are sticking around to teach complete Tantra classes. The few that do (and do it well) are having a hard time making ends meet. (That's just my opinion, I guess.) There are also short 5-10 minute interviews with Khenpo Tsultrim Lodro (a short "snapshot" of the Tibetan take on the week's particular subject, which was often better (to me) than the 90min-long "talking head" version ) and Ven. Tsoknyi Rinpoche ("How does Buddhism change in a New Culture" and "Benefits and Dangers of Secularing Buddhism", the TB rebuttal, as it were. He did note that motivation is the key. Bad agenda = bad results, good motivation will cause good results.) Have I noted the course is FREE? So you can take the course, and the following courses, without doing any of the assignments/quizzes. Watch (or download) any video or transcript to your heart's content whenever you wish in any order you wish. (That assumes the courses are not taken off-line at a future date.) Further in the course description is a blurb that may point to at least 3 future courses in "Mahāyāna, …Vajrayāna, …and a fourth vehicle, which is explicit in many Tibetan materials, though no standard term ever emerged that was accepted by all sectarian traditions - we will thus term it as the “Natural Vehicle” or “Post Tantra”." If the quality of guided meditations (GM) in following classes are even half the quality of this course's GM's, then that's all the reason I need to continue the future classes, too. Course gotchas: #1. That said (other shoe dropping here), the other half of the course was videos of people reading their prepared academic papers, in monotone or semi-monotone voices. (Transcripts are available. I figure I can read a paper in 5% of the time someone else reads it to me in a video. Ugh.) However, they would probably need the voice of Morgan Freeman, James Earl Jones, B. Cumberbatch or James Spader to keep me awake. To be fair, the content is golden, although the papers seems to be geared to the academic community, rather than the student community. Books and Videos on these subjects are all over Amazon, YouTube, FPMT, Dharma-Documentaries, etc. #2. The Sharon Salzberg (SS), in her interview, brought up an excellent point. She noted that she and a noted clinical psychology (CP) scientist (researcher) (whose name I have forgotten) were at a conference where the issue on the table was that someone was having trouble with "loving kindness" meditation as a first meditation class. SS noted that she would instantly recommend the student change to "calm abiding" meditation whereas the CP could not change that student's meditation technique to another technique (such as calm abiding) as her research findings would then be invalid. Similarly, many of the non-Buddhist guided meditations that I viewed in this course felt like a physical education or "How To" class. Do this. Do that. It did not feel as though they lived the material, just taught it. (Whereas it was patently obvious Dr. Klein & Anam Thubten were definitely "walking the walk", so to speak, so were able to speak from the heart.) Interviews I did not watch, that may be of great interest to others, include meditation in the school system by Tish Jennings, meditation in the Business Community (an interview with David Mick), the Burmese meditation tradition in an interview with Erik Braun, the MBSR (Meditation Based Stress Reduction) with Susan Bauer-Wu, and meditation in the legal community with Rhonda Magee. And all that is just the first course. Many of it's "failings" may just be my karmic opinions. The course is worth checking out and watching/reading/meditating on those parts that interest you. In that respect, the breadth of the course content is quite nice and so well done. Grade: B-. | me awake. To be fair, the | Content | is golden, although the papers seems | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | (I posted this review in a blog [https://guhyasamajacenter.wordpress.com/2015/10/03/review-of-the-free-coursera-tibetan-buddhist-meditation-and-the-modern-world-lesser-vehicle-course-given-by-uva/]. Much of the courseware was outstanding. Many of the videos were so poorly done (boring) that I couldn't watch them. (I do not watch people read prepared text in a video. Ever.) ----------- From the blog ---------------------------------- I recently took the FREE Coursera course, "Tibetan Buddhist Meditation and the Modern World". (https://www.coursera.org/learn/buddhist-meditation) From the course catalog: " Tibetan Buddhist Meditation and the Modern World explores the immense variety of meditation practices past and present. We present their histories, their philosophical underpinnings, their transformations in the modern global world, and we give you a chance to reflect upon meditation practices through secular contemplations designed just for this course." (Note: In the class overview, it is noted that the term "Lesser Vehicle" is "perjorative" but they use it anyway. ??") There are many FREE reasons to take this FREE "Lesser Vehicle" course (the first of four): #1 - An awesome, wonderful hour-long interview with Sharon Salzberg, one of the founders of the Insight Meditation Society. What an awesome lady. I was not aware that she is also a Dzogchen student. (Did I mention it was FREE?) Worth signing up for the course just to skip to Week 6 to watch this interview. #2 - Guided Meditations by Dr. Anne Klein and Anam Thubten. Very, very, very nice. FREE, it's ALL FREE. #3 - The Science of Mindfulness against the Background of the Scientific Study of Meditation videos with Dr. Clifford Saron, neuroscientist. His videos start in Week 1 and continue through Week 6 in building a basis for understanding the scientific research on meditation. He (and the course) demonstrates what can and cannot (presently) be scientifically proven about meditation. One excellent example: Two trained pianists were told to learn a complicated piece of music, one with the piano, and the other only in his imagination. After 2 weeks (I think) of practice, their brains' MRI patterns exhibited almost the exact same changes. Dr. Saron noted that the results are not definitive but still may have implications for the compassion/bodhicitta meditations we do. #4: An interview on "Buddhist Modernism", with David McMahan. Very much academic-oriented. One statement, in particular, struck me since, the more I think about it, the more I think it might be true: "The Buddhist Tantra teachings are not accepted nor are they popular in the West." For all the Buddhist monastics that visit the USA and the West to grab donations and go back to their home countries, few of them are sticking around to teach complete Tantra classes. The few that do (and do it well) are having a hard time making ends meet. (That's just my opinion, I guess.) There are also short 5-10 minute interviews with Khenpo Tsultrim Lodro (a short "snapshot" of the Tibetan take on the week's particular subject, which was often better (to me) than the 90min-long "talking head" version ) and Ven. Tsoknyi Rinpoche ("How does Buddhism change in a New Culture" and "Benefits and Dangers of Secularing Buddhism", the TB rebuttal, as it were. He did note that motivation is the key. Bad agenda = bad results, good motivation will cause good results.) Have I noted the course is FREE? So you can take the course, and the following courses, without doing any of the assignments/quizzes. Watch (or download) any video or transcript to your heart's content whenever you wish in any order you wish. (That assumes the courses are not taken off-line at a future date.) Further in the course description is a blurb that may point to at least 3 future courses in "Mahāyāna, …Vajrayāna, …and a fourth vehicle, which is explicit in many Tibetan materials, though no standard term ever emerged that was accepted by all sectarian traditions - we will thus term it as the “Natural Vehicle” or “Post Tantra”." If the quality of guided meditations (GM) in following classes are even half the quality of this course's GM's, then that's all the reason I need to continue the future classes, too. Course gotchas: #1. That said (other shoe dropping here), the other half of the course was videos of people reading their prepared academic papers, in monotone or semi-monotone voices. (Transcripts are available. I figure I can read a paper in 5% of the time someone else reads it to me in a video. Ugh.) However, they would probably need the voice of Morgan Freeman, James Earl Jones, B. Cumberbatch or James Spader to keep me awake. To be fair, the content is golden, although the papers seems to be geared to the academic community, rather than the student community. Books and Videos on these subjects are all over Amazon, YouTube, FPMT, Dharma-Documentaries, etc. #2. The Sharon Salzberg (SS), in her interview, brought up an excellent point. She noted that she and a noted clinical psychology (CP) scientist (researcher) (whose name I have forgotten) were at a conference where the issue on the table was that someone was having trouble with "loving kindness" meditation as a first meditation class. SS noted that she would instantly recommend the student change to "calm abiding" meditation whereas the CP could not change that student's meditation technique to another technique (such as calm abiding) as her research findings would then be invalid. Similarly, many of the non-Buddhist guided meditations that I viewed in this course felt like a physical education or "How To" class. Do this. Do that. It did not feel as though they lived the material, just taught it. (Whereas it was patently obvious Dr. Klein & Anam Thubten were definitely "walking the walk", so to speak, so were able to speak from the heart.) Interviews I did not watch, that may be of great interest to others, include meditation in the school system by Tish Jennings, meditation in the Business Community (an interview with David Mick), the Burmese meditation tradition in an interview with Erik Braun, the MBSR (Meditation Based Stress Reduction) with Susan Bauer-Wu, and meditation in the legal community with Rhonda Magee. And all that is just the first course. Many of it's "failings" may just be my karmic opinions. The course is worth checking out and watching/reading/meditating on those parts that interest you. In that respect, the breadth of the course content is quite nice and so well done. Grade: B-. | respect, the breadth of the course | Content | is quite nice and so well | Positive | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | A lot of talking, little content. | A lot of talking, little | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The content of this course was superb. The level of detail and the connections between traditional teaching with modern science and western practice was very helpful, and much appreciated. The interviews and additional content on practice and historical significance was wonderful. The neuroscience content was presented very effectively, with just the right amount of detail needed here, and the critique and straightforward way that the research was presented was masterful, and so much needed in today's cult-like vision of meditation. I look forward to the other 3 segments of the course. I would recommend putting the transcripts of the lectures together in a more easily readable format, then use the videos by Dr. Germano to highlight the issues presented rather than just reading. | The | Content | of this course was superb. The | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The content of this course was superb. The level of detail and the connections between traditional teaching with modern science and western practice was very helpful, and much appreciated. The interviews and additional content on practice and historical significance was wonderful. The neuroscience content was presented very effectively, with just the right amount of detail needed here, and the critique and straightforward way that the research was presented was masterful, and so much needed in today's cult-like vision of meditation. I look forward to the other 3 segments of the course. I would recommend putting the transcripts of the lectures together in a more easily readable format, then use the videos by Dr. Germano to highlight the issues presented rather than just reading. | much appreciated. The interviews and additional | Content | on practice and historical significance was | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The content of this course was superb. The level of detail and the connections between traditional teaching with modern science and western practice was very helpful, and much appreciated. The interviews and additional content on practice and historical significance was wonderful. The neuroscience content was presented very effectively, with just the right amount of detail needed here, and the critique and straightforward way that the research was presented was masterful, and so much needed in today's cult-like vision of meditation. I look forward to the other 3 segments of the course. I would recommend putting the transcripts of the lectures together in a more easily readable format, then use the videos by Dr. Germano to highlight the issues presented rather than just reading. | historical significance was wonderful. The neuroscience | Content | was presented very effectively, with just | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I enjoyed and benefitted from some of this course. In particular I would highly recommend the Meditation Labs, the Science of Meditation videos and the short presentations from the Tibetan Buddhist monks . But I think the creators of this course need to be a lot clearer about what their aims are in that part of the course which Dr Germano presented. Since this was he was presenting the main overview of Buddhist content it was particularly disappointing that his presentations were so bad. I understand that there were difficulties in getting the course up and running from the various delays in its starting date and the change to its title and perhaps Dr Germano's role was more affected than the other lecturers. However it's pretty damning when he manages to to be so off-putting to so many of the students, going on the discussion comments. For my own part, I've studied and practiced Buddhism for more than 30 years and I am left with little sense of what his aims were for his lectures. To be more specific Dr Germano's Presentation: -he read from what I presume were lecture notes but more likely he was reading from an academic paper. the language was pretty turgid. -he could have just provided a PDF of his paper / notes for us to download. That would have been much more helpful as presumably it would have had some structure to it. doing that would have enabled him to use his video time in a more creative way. -MOOCs are wonderful audio-visual opportunities but he had no slides or illustrations at all. The few text headers which appeared then disappeared in only a very few seconds and sometimes did not relate directly to what he was saying at that time. Dr Germano's content: the amended title was Tibetan Buddhist Meditation. This is a complex subject which encompasses many layers of meditation practice culled from historically earlier Buddhist traditions. Can I suggest that any future version of this course includes the following: -include a video which presents the main aspects of the historical development of Buddhism. There was some mention of this in Germano's material but he did it from the Tibetan point of view. Surely what a modern day presentation needs is a modern impartial historical analysis of the subject. It's not as if there aren't plenty of academics and practitioners who are active in this field. -it's confusing to describe Tibetan Lesser Vehicle practices but then illustrate them with Pali text sources, modern Mindfulness practice, and modern Brahma Vihara practice all of which have emerged from the modern Theravadin tradition. -it's also perplexing to include information about many modern Theravadin teachers (Sayadaw, Goenka) in a course apparently not about them. Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed the videos about Sayadaw and the interview with Sharon Saltzberg, but I am left in the dark about just what differences, if any, there are between them and Tibetan meditation. Overall I think this course was offered prematurely. Much of its content was enthralling, inspiring and very useful practically. However much of it was not. | presenting the main overview of Buddhist | Content | it was particularly disappointing that his | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I enjoyed and benefitted from some of this course. In particular I would highly recommend the Meditation Labs, the Science of Meditation videos and the short presentations from the Tibetan Buddhist monks . But I think the creators of this course need to be a lot clearer about what their aims are in that part of the course which Dr Germano presented. Since this was he was presenting the main overview of Buddhist content it was particularly disappointing that his presentations were so bad. I understand that there were difficulties in getting the course up and running from the various delays in its starting date and the change to its title and perhaps Dr Germano's role was more affected than the other lecturers. However it's pretty damning when he manages to to be so off-putting to so many of the students, going on the discussion comments. For my own part, I've studied and practiced Buddhism for more than 30 years and I am left with little sense of what his aims were for his lectures. To be more specific Dr Germano's Presentation: -he read from what I presume were lecture notes but more likely he was reading from an academic paper. the language was pretty turgid. -he could have just provided a PDF of his paper / notes for us to download. That would have been much more helpful as presumably it would have had some structure to it. doing that would have enabled him to use his video time in a more creative way. -MOOCs are wonderful audio-visual opportunities but he had no slides or illustrations at all. The few text headers which appeared then disappeared in only a very few seconds and sometimes did not relate directly to what he was saying at that time. Dr Germano's content: the amended title was Tibetan Buddhist Meditation. This is a complex subject which encompasses many layers of meditation practice culled from historically earlier Buddhist traditions. Can I suggest that any future version of this course includes the following: -include a video which presents the main aspects of the historical development of Buddhism. There was some mention of this in Germano's material but he did it from the Tibetan point of view. Surely what a modern day presentation needs is a modern impartial historical analysis of the subject. It's not as if there aren't plenty of academics and practitioners who are active in this field. -it's confusing to describe Tibetan Lesser Vehicle practices but then illustrate them with Pali text sources, modern Mindfulness practice, and modern Brahma Vihara practice all of which have emerged from the modern Theravadin tradition. -it's also perplexing to include information about many modern Theravadin teachers (Sayadaw, Goenka) in a course apparently not about them. Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed the videos about Sayadaw and the interview with Sharon Saltzberg, but I am left in the dark about just what differences, if any, there are between them and Tibetan meditation. Overall I think this course was offered prematurely. Much of its content was enthralling, inspiring and very useful practically. However much of it was not. | saying at that time. Dr Germano's | Content | the amended title was Tibetan Buddhist | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I enjoyed and benefitted from some of this course. In particular I would highly recommend the Meditation Labs, the Science of Meditation videos and the short presentations from the Tibetan Buddhist monks . But I think the creators of this course need to be a lot clearer about what their aims are in that part of the course which Dr Germano presented. Since this was he was presenting the main overview of Buddhist content it was particularly disappointing that his presentations were so bad. I understand that there were difficulties in getting the course up and running from the various delays in its starting date and the change to its title and perhaps Dr Germano's role was more affected than the other lecturers. However it's pretty damning when he manages to to be so off-putting to so many of the students, going on the discussion comments. For my own part, I've studied and practiced Buddhism for more than 30 years and I am left with little sense of what his aims were for his lectures. To be more specific Dr Germano's Presentation: -he read from what I presume were lecture notes but more likely he was reading from an academic paper. the language was pretty turgid. -he could have just provided a PDF of his paper / notes for us to download. That would have been much more helpful as presumably it would have had some structure to it. doing that would have enabled him to use his video time in a more creative way. -MOOCs are wonderful audio-visual opportunities but he had no slides or illustrations at all. The few text headers which appeared then disappeared in only a very few seconds and sometimes did not relate directly to what he was saying at that time. Dr Germano's content: the amended title was Tibetan Buddhist Meditation. This is a complex subject which encompasses many layers of meditation practice culled from historically earlier Buddhist traditions. Can I suggest that any future version of this course includes the following: -include a video which presents the main aspects of the historical development of Buddhism. There was some mention of this in Germano's material but he did it from the Tibetan point of view. Surely what a modern day presentation needs is a modern impartial historical analysis of the subject. It's not as if there aren't plenty of academics and practitioners who are active in this field. -it's confusing to describe Tibetan Lesser Vehicle practices but then illustrate them with Pali text sources, modern Mindfulness practice, and modern Brahma Vihara practice all of which have emerged from the modern Theravadin tradition. -it's also perplexing to include information about many modern Theravadin teachers (Sayadaw, Goenka) in a course apparently not about them. Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed the videos about Sayadaw and the interview with Sharon Saltzberg, but I am left in the dark about just what differences, if any, there are between them and Tibetan meditation. Overall I think this course was offered prematurely. Much of its content was enthralling, inspiring and very useful practically. However much of it was not. | was offered prematurely. Much of its | Content | was enthralling, inspiring and very useful | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The content of the course is amazingly rich. I've particularly appreciated all the interviews. The science was also very interesting, although at the end (starting from week 4 if I remember well), the result don't seem so convincing. But it is still really amazing. (May I suggest to try to use Machine Learning algorithm to analyze the huge amount of result from the retreat project, they are getting pretty good at facial recognition and analysis.) The contemplative labs were an interesting plus. The only caveats is that, although the content presented by Germano and Schaeffer is amazing (and precious to me), I think they could improve the presentation. I would suggest to consult with a specialist in communication who will be able to point out what could be improved and how. I feel that without that, the communication objective will fail (as reported by most students including myself). Here are a few points I have noticed. Complex background create a distraction, especially when the reading is monotonous, it's preferable to have simple neutral background, like a library. Reading in a monotonous voice is not engaging for the viewer. Dandling around and all sort of gestural distractions don't help us focusing on the content. Sentences are too long and use too many technical words, two things that any communicator will immediately suggest to drop especially if you are targeting a large audience. In one video the background was nice (a forest), yet the noise of the bird were too loud compare to the voice. Plus there was many cut in this video and almost every time the camera had moved from its previous position creating yet another distraction. But don't get me wrong, I have appreciated this content, I just felt that it needed a huge investment from my part to be able to grab it into memory and learn from it. This is the reason why I haven't graded this course with 5 stars. I think that if the speaker could improve this part it would facilitate the students work and improve greatly the overall learning. | The | Content | of the course is amazingly rich. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The content of the course is amazingly rich. I've particularly appreciated all the interviews. The science was also very interesting, although at the end (starting from week 4 if I remember well), the result don't seem so convincing. But it is still really amazing. (May I suggest to try to use Machine Learning algorithm to analyze the huge amount of result from the retreat project, they are getting pretty good at facial recognition and analysis.) The contemplative labs were an interesting plus. The only caveats is that, although the content presented by Germano and Schaeffer is amazing (and precious to me), I think they could improve the presentation. I would suggest to consult with a specialist in communication who will be able to point out what could be improved and how. I feel that without that, the communication objective will fail (as reported by most students including myself). Here are a few points I have noticed. Complex background create a distraction, especially when the reading is monotonous, it's preferable to have simple neutral background, like a library. Reading in a monotonous voice is not engaging for the viewer. Dandling around and all sort of gestural distractions don't help us focusing on the content. Sentences are too long and use too many technical words, two things that any communicator will immediately suggest to drop especially if you are targeting a large audience. In one video the background was nice (a forest), yet the noise of the bird were too loud compare to the voice. Plus there was many cut in this video and almost every time the camera had moved from its previous position creating yet another distraction. But don't get me wrong, I have appreciated this content, I just felt that it needed a huge investment from my part to be able to grab it into memory and learn from it. This is the reason why I haven't graded this course with 5 stars. I think that if the speaker could improve this part it would facilitate the students work and improve greatly the overall learning. | only caveats is that, although the | Content | presented by Germano and Schaeffer is | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The content of the course is amazingly rich. I've particularly appreciated all the interviews. The science was also very interesting, although at the end (starting from week 4 if I remember well), the result don't seem so convincing. But it is still really amazing. (May I suggest to try to use Machine Learning algorithm to analyze the huge amount of result from the retreat project, they are getting pretty good at facial recognition and analysis.) The contemplative labs were an interesting plus. The only caveats is that, although the content presented by Germano and Schaeffer is amazing (and precious to me), I think they could improve the presentation. I would suggest to consult with a specialist in communication who will be able to point out what could be improved and how. I feel that without that, the communication objective will fail (as reported by most students including myself). Here are a few points I have noticed. Complex background create a distraction, especially when the reading is monotonous, it's preferable to have simple neutral background, like a library. Reading in a monotonous voice is not engaging for the viewer. Dandling around and all sort of gestural distractions don't help us focusing on the content. Sentences are too long and use too many technical words, two things that any communicator will immediately suggest to drop especially if you are targeting a large audience. In one video the background was nice (a forest), yet the noise of the bird were too loud compare to the voice. Plus there was many cut in this video and almost every time the camera had moved from its previous position creating yet another distraction. But don't get me wrong, I have appreciated this content, I just felt that it needed a huge investment from my part to be able to grab it into memory and learn from it. This is the reason why I haven't graded this course with 5 stars. I think that if the speaker could improve this part it would facilitate the students work and improve greatly the overall learning. | don't help us focusing on the | Content | Sentences are too long and use | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The content of the course is amazingly rich. I've particularly appreciated all the interviews. The science was also very interesting, although at the end (starting from week 4 if I remember well), the result don't seem so convincing. But it is still really amazing. (May I suggest to try to use Machine Learning algorithm to analyze the huge amount of result from the retreat project, they are getting pretty good at facial recognition and analysis.) The contemplative labs were an interesting plus. The only caveats is that, although the content presented by Germano and Schaeffer is amazing (and precious to me), I think they could improve the presentation. I would suggest to consult with a specialist in communication who will be able to point out what could be improved and how. I feel that without that, the communication objective will fail (as reported by most students including myself). Here are a few points I have noticed. Complex background create a distraction, especially when the reading is monotonous, it's preferable to have simple neutral background, like a library. Reading in a monotonous voice is not engaging for the viewer. Dandling around and all sort of gestural distractions don't help us focusing on the content. Sentences are too long and use too many technical words, two things that any communicator will immediately suggest to drop especially if you are targeting a large audience. In one video the background was nice (a forest), yet the noise of the bird were too loud compare to the voice. Plus there was many cut in this video and almost every time the camera had moved from its previous position creating yet another distraction. But don't get me wrong, I have appreciated this content, I just felt that it needed a huge investment from my part to be able to grab it into memory and learn from it. This is the reason why I haven't graded this course with 5 stars. I think that if the speaker could improve this part it would facilitate the students work and improve greatly the overall learning. | me wrong, I have appreciated this | Content | I just felt that it needed | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I am afraid this is only two stars from me for now. It is a course with great content and a lot of potential, but the way how it is delivered can be greatly improved to make it easier to understand and more engaging. I just hope the team do not give up, but improve this to be one of the best courses on Coursera - it can well be! | It is a course with great | Content | and a lot of potential, but | Positive | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The content is great, I think the delivery could be better, and there was a great deal of interesting but difficult and for me peripheral stuff about how the brain worked. Nevertheless, even this had me wowed at times. I have learnt a great deal from every aspect of this course, and am greatly looking forward to future courses, as you have promised!. A | The | Content | is great, I think the delivery | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| aAo9tS8NEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Professor Amar is very well organized and explains the contents in a very clear - and deep - way! | very well organized and explains the | Content | in a very clear - and | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| aAo9tS8NEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | The lecturer's style doesn't go with the nature of a MOOC. By using his book as the notes for lectures, he doesn't give himself a chance to prioritize content so it's kept clear in the exposition. His favorite word is uh-um. In a classroom (face-to-face) situation, the lecturer is likely to see and react to listeners' look of confusion; in a studio he is just talking to himself. He repeats points -- this can be good if done smoothly but it's very confusing when the lecturer is inarticulate, like the present case. It's really too bad because he clearly has a lot of knowledge that could be used to popularize thinking about the unwritten constitution. | give himself a chance to prioritize | Content | so it's kept clear in the | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| AeZELZrJEeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | Content was good, but occasionally hard to understand the lecturers' English. Worth taking though. | | Content | was good, but occasionally hard to | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| AeZELZrJEeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | Great teacher and contents. | Great teacher and | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| afay6xVFEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | I was disappointed by this Course maybe because I had a great expectations for it. Months of delay and poor content. | it. Months of delay and poor | Content | | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| afay6xVFEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | This specialisation started off good in the first 1-2 courses but has since taken many steps back. The content is dated and not well though through, and it feels like the whole thing could have been put into 2-3 courses | since taken many steps back. The | Content | is dated and not well though | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| afay6xVFEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | I was quite disappointed by this course, after several delays the course stated months later than originally planned. The videos are badly edited, and there did not seem to be a lot of content within this course. | seem to be a lot of | Content | within this course. | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| afay6xVFEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | I expected to see much more about "Information" Design, in a sense of Design of Comunication, Design of the Data, Theory of Comunication and how can you remove ambiguity from a design (visual, industrial, content or what ever design it is). Still ok, but I expected better than wireframes and mockups which we already learned a while back. Nice roadmap although. | ambiguity from a design (visual, industrial, | Content | or what ever design it is). | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| afDgOoSTEeSA1yIAC1EHSw | Good content but the Chinese translation is bad, which makes quiz quite obscure in meaning | Good | Content | but the Chinese translation is bad, | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| AMBr8zelEeWJaxK5AT4frw | I am disappointed with the course because of its only focus on Apple TV and smartwatch apps. The course structure is a bit messy and the content is quite technical. Don't call it "App Design" since it's more App Development! | is a bit messy and the | Content | is quite technical. Don't call it | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| AMBr8zelEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Content is taught too fast! | | Content | is taught too fast! | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| AMBr8zelEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Bad content and instructor. no logistic in place. if you are planning to pay to get certificate. I would suggest look else where. my $279 are stuck in here and they don't reply to forum posts. | Bad | Content | and instructor. no logistic in place. | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| AMBr8zelEeWJaxK5AT4frw | It was good but i felt the last two weeks like stuffing content. I'd have like to dig deeper into mobile development instead of wasting time in appleTV | the last two weeks like stuffing | Content | I'd have like to dig deeper | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| AMBr8zelEeWJaxK5AT4frw | This course had too much content in one-run and some of the topic-assignments had too much confusing questions and answers which were hard to figure out made this course a bit a bad experience. The same goes for the end-assignment project where much functionality was required within a short time -- and the course was delayed so many of the students could not fit it into their schedule. | This course had too much | Content | in one-run and some of the | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| aPM0Nx7iEea8agoSdQeRvQ | The material in this course is well presented, though scarce at times. However it has its share of problems : -little to no interaction from TA's or mentors in the forums -the quizzes are often out of sync with the lectures -the final exam has severe problems with questions (form not content). In more detail, on the final exam, some of the questions don't even contain all the content to answer them. They can request multiple answers but have single question boxes and/or the reverse. | severe problems with questions (form not | Content | In more detail, on the final | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| aPM0Nx7iEea8agoSdQeRvQ | The material in this course is well presented, though scarce at times. However it has its share of problems : -little to no interaction from TA's or mentors in the forums -the quizzes are often out of sync with the lectures -the final exam has severe problems with questions (form not content). In more detail, on the final exam, some of the questions don't even contain all the content to answer them. They can request multiple answers but have single question boxes and/or the reverse. | questions don't even contain all the | Content | to answer them. They can request | Negative | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| aPvqvZlYEeWQGBKrxISOrQ | Very nice course. However, the final project is not very close to the course content. Still, it is very well doable thanks to the very helpful tutor / mentor. | not very close to the course | Content | Still, it is very well doable | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| aPvqvZlYEeWQGBKrxISOrQ | I have very mixed feelings after completing this course. I can hardly say I feel I have learned any valuable stuff, especially in contrast to the first course when I had a feeling "I am growing with knowledge". Here, I was able to follow lectures' instructions but I did not fully understand why I was doing this and that. I believe not enough foundation was given to make people use the Galaxy tools consciously. The final project was ridiculously far more difficult than what had been covered in the class. I truly believe in the idea of giving ambitious final projects, but I do not believe in the idea of giving the project that is by no means doable based on the course content. Very discouraging. | means doable based on the course | Content | Very discouraging. | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| aPvqvZlYEeWQGBKrxISOrQ | This course did not make any effort until I had to dig deep into biology by myself. The course content is insufficient. I think if a sample input was used and every field of the input were explained and also the outputs were explained then it would make much more sense. Poorly designed and demonstrated. Thankfully I started the last assignment very quickly, it took me 10 days to understand how to proceed with the assignment. The TA is excellent, without his help I wouldn't pass this course. | into biology by myself. The course | Content | is insufficient. I think if a | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| aPvqvZlYEeWQGBKrxISOrQ | This course's content is useful but honestly the final project is ridiculous because it is peer reviewed and the project is not very straightforward. Everyone gets different answers and without an answer key, no one knows what is right and wrong making it is almost impossible to pass. This needs to change. | This course's | Content | is useful but honestly the final | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| aPvqvZlYEeWQGBKrxISOrQ | Really interesting course! The introduction to Galaxy and all of the analysis tools is awesome. There is a pretty big cliff between the course content and the final project; it would be helpful if there were more detailed information along the way about what each of the analysis steps means (i.e., interpretation of the information, versus just knowing what file type to select at which analysis step). Based on the discussion board, many students had similar thoughts. Grading the final projects for others is a bit uncomfortable, given that no answers are provided for the counts, and there are multiple different workflows that could be considered correct. | pretty big cliff between the course | Content | and the final project; it would | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| aPvqvZlYEeWQGBKrxISOrQ | This was a bit challenging, not in content, but more in organization. I felt like I was getting freshman-level lectures and than was given a graduate-level assignment. The directions and expectations could have been clearer but the TA was terrific in trying to help us thru our difficulties. | was a bit challenging, not in | Content | but more in organization. I felt | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| aPvqvZlYEeWQGBKrxISOrQ | This course was very disappointing and much of the content in the tests and course did not show up in the course project. I felt like the course project was far more advanced than all the other detail. In addition, there was minimal to NO detail on instruction. VERY poor development here and I would not recommend it to anyone. All you need to do is look at all the threads of complaints. I am looking forward to the next Python course and h | very disappointing and much of the | Content | in the tests and course did | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| aPvqvZlYEeWQGBKrxISOrQ | It gives a quick background on Galaxy and its softwares. Content is appropriate but does not prepare you for even the final assignment or real genomic problems. | background on Galaxy and its softwares. | Content | is appropriate but does not prepare | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| aPvqvZlYEeWQGBKrxISOrQ | clear content | clear | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| At1XBOAAEeWoTg63tTECEQ | This course is very informative and gives starting platform to pursue this field. I really like this course. There is one thing that I felt missing. I could use some coding assignment to better grasp the course contents. it can be made optional. This could provide more help to people who wants to have a deeper understanding. | assignment to better grasp the course | Content | it can be made optional. This | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | This is absolutely fantastic course. Thank you very much for offering it! The course content is very good and there pointers to enormous amount of very enlightening literature! | much for offering it! The course | Content | is very good and there pointers | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Was excellent. Content and layout | Was excellent. | Content | and layout | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Well organized content, excellent instructors! Easy and fun! | Well organized | Content | excellent instructors! Easy and fun! | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | I almost gave this two stars, but the content of the course is excellent, and I didn't want to take away from that. To start off, for an introductory class, this covers a large amount and variety of material. It might be better served to break it up into even smaller sections over the course of something like ten weeks or even twelve instead of cramming it all into seven weeks. The lectures are enjoyable, but often they consist of nothing but the professor speaking. There are so many new terms, definitions, and ideas being introduced that it would help if these lectures also included slides or graphs with some of these ideas being broken down, as you would have in a regular class on a projector or on a chalkboard. Frequently, the practice quizzes are just the same questions from the video lectures repeated over again, and offer very little prep for the actual quizzes, which are painfully pedantic for a non-credit course. Every section has a different style of quiz, which is hard to prepare for. I am someone who usually tests well and have been struggling with most of these, even when I read all of the handouts and take notes. So, if this same course could be broken up over a slightly longer time and the quizzes could be more uniform, the lectures contained some slides, the course would be a brilliant introduction to philosophy overall. It's got all of the meat there, the presentation just makes it tough to digest. | gave this two stars, but the | Content | of the course is excellent, and | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Great lectures and nicely explained, apart from one lecture (6th - maybe it was me, not understanding the topic properly). For the future, I suggest to have more "visible" support of the lecturers; lecturers should address us directly and enage us more to interact with the content as well as our classmates. Moreover, and I am speaking subjectivily, I found all topics very simple. To deepen my understand, I would suggest to have compulsory essays to elaborate the aquired knowledge. Thank you for your effort! | us more to interact with the | Content | as well as our classmates. Moreover, | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Fully satisfied with this course. Very good program and content, good videos, professional teachers... I really learned a lot. I recommend the course 100 % | this course. Very good program and | Content | good videos, professional teachers. . . | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | I have a mixed feeling about it. Sometimes I felt, this course was trying to deliver more content in short time. | course was trying to deliver more | Content | in short time. | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | This was a fantastic course! The content was very interesting, especially the section on time-travel, which I absolutely loved. I also liked that the course was perfectly manageable, unlike all the other MOOC's that I have attempted, where the time commitment turns out to be much bigger than expected. | This was a fantastic course! The | Content | was very interesting, especially the section | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | I gave this course 5 stars because the content does match the description, a general overview of the topic of Philosophy. It introduces the student to the concepts involved with the study of and the approach to Philosophy from various topics. It does not go into any specific philosophers very deeply, and instead focuses on the general study or overview of what is going on in the "philosophical world" as of 2013. The course has not been updated, from what I can tell from that time. The Forums are "there" and the class is "supposed" to be live, but it did not have that feel to it. It was more of a "study on your own" experience and yes, we have a forum area. i found it not to be very active after the first week, (introductions were encouraged) but perhaps taking this course over the Christmas holiday (that fell in the middle of the course) was not the best time. I am near the end of the course and have put a lot of time effort and extra reading into it, but it does not seem this will be rewarded i.e by a certificate with distinction, at least there does not seem to be active involvement to that extent. 2-3 of the lectures had "extra"videos" of the professors addressing forum questions, but I do think these were outdated or from the first run of the course (?) as they seems to be talking about topics that were not necessarily in the forums at the time. I cannot determine that for certain, but, it was my impression. I would HIGHLY suggest purchase of the book that goes with this course, due to week 6, when clearly the topic is not entirely covered in the notes nor the lecture (my opinion only) and the book was needed to get thru the quiz. The professor that week had an accent and spoke very fast, and even listening in a slower speed did not seem to help much. The book is a worthy purchase, look for it on EBAY, or Amazon or a Used Book website. The book does go deeper on all topics and again, especially for week 6 and it is looking like possibly week 7 as well are best studied with the book as well as notes provided by the course. Again, this is an overview course, and it is interesting. If you are looking to study specific philosophers in depth - this is not the course. It is the course however to take before taking others or to review or learn what is going on in the area this area of study and it did hold my interest. As others have commented the final week touches upon time travel and the professor has introduced interesting aspects that involve the philosophical in this unit. Each week a different instructor presents information so you are switching learning styles weekly which is, I think made a more smooth transition if you actually have the book and the chapter that the instructor wrote. I would recommend it for at least another 6 mo to a year - after that (say 2017 perhaps the lectures should be freshened up, as new information may be out there, or at least they should tape something that says, "yes this was originally taped in 2013, however the info is still on target" or if not then add a lecture that updates the course to the latest in that area of philosophy. Overall, this being my second Coursera class I have found it to be of high quality, and worthy of my investment to obtain the certificate that is offered. And I do thank all of the professors who participated in this collaboration, it is again, a very interesting course that I think is a "must take" course if one is to really understand what is "going on" with Philosophy. | this course 5 stars because the | Content | does match the description, a general | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | the course content was very much good and it was very useful. | the course | Content | was very much good and it | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Very good course, Offers insights from various domains of Philosophy, which one doesn't go in usually. And ends up discovering that there are in fact various ways to look at this subject which is an essential tool for living and constant improving our quality of life. The University of Edinburgh has structured this course well, and the faculties, bright and deep in their domains makes you understand the contents more easily then they are. Thank you. | their domains makes you understand the | Content | more easily then they are. Thank | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | I really enjoyed this course because contents were very interesting and contemporaneous. Reading about travelling time was a real pleasure. Teachers nice, quizzes and texts supported well my development. Congratulations. | I really enjoyed this course because | Content | were very interesting and contemporaneous. Reading | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | It is a good course with great content. The professors are well prepared and share their knowledge in an easy way so that everyone can understand their explanations. | is a good course with great | Content | The professors are well prepared and | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | The course content is very superficial. The pass mark is very high for a course I had taken because of a mild interest. You have to get 80% to pass. One unit in particular was very confusing. It took me 7 attempts to pass it as I had no idea what the first question was about and there was no guidance as to what I was doing wrong. | The course | Content | is very superficial. The pass mark | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | I didn't find the overall content of the course very well chosen for an introduction to philosophy - since it covers so little. The title of this course should have been "An Introduction to Just a Couple of Topics in Philosophy." And there are so few philosophers covered. However, the biggest problem was instructor Alasdair Richmond, whose response to debate was locking threads down every time his ideological positions were challenged. He showed himself completely inept to have a debate with more than one course participant and chose to censor a variety of viewpoints he dislikes. It was particularly ironic to see an instructor exercise censorship in a Philosophy course - a domain whose objective, after all, is the pursuit of truth as well as to ask and debate the "why" of everything! A petty tyrant does not make a good teacher. Should I ever meet anyone interested in studying Philosophy, my first recommendation to them will be stay away from the University of Edinburgh, since there is no respect for debate, freedom of expression, or inquiry there. | I didn't find the overall | Content | of the course very well chosen | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| AVCeb1TBEeWWpxI8aBTOyQ | I need subtitles in spanish, content is good | I need subtitles in spanish, | Content | is good | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| AXmFGEEjEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Poor content | Poor | Content | | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| aySVfHahEeWYyRL_9oqa4Q | Great professors, excellent content. | Great professors, excellent | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| aZysaaT7EeWiJhIfkgG__w | 2nd Last week should actually be the last week's content. It seemed out of context and involved so many new things | should actually be the last week's | Content | It seemed out of context and | Negative | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | I again found many of the lectures to be difficult to follow along, there seems to be lots of different styles of videos in the way that the person was superimposed on the slides. In fact it was often impossible to read the text in the slide due to the size of the presenters head which obscured the text. Honestly this data science course is getting worse as the months progress, you really should think of updating the content of the course if you want to continue to charge money for it. 2 stars as I did actually learn something despite the quality of the material and its delivery. | really should think of updating the | Content | of the course if you want | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | Content and quizz are not aligned. Mentors answer to 0% of the forum posts. Poor student community. Do not pay for this course, just follow the swirl and/or get some tuto about regressions. | | Content | and quizz are not aligned. Mentors | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | This course is the first one in the Data Science series to lapse in terms of the clarity of the lectures, and the sense of cohesiveness of the material. Brian Caffo's lectures in Statistical Inference were good; in this course they seem to veer left and right rather than get straight to the essence of whatever subject he is lecturing about. A more structured final project would have been helpful. The instructions on this project weren't quite so blunt as to say "Take this data set, do some regression-y stuff and come back with something about these two variables," but that's basically as far as our instructions went. It could have been a great learning experience to have a more detailed guide through the construction of a regression analysis, but instead an assignment which was 40% of our grade was put together as an afterthought. It was the assignment equivalent of stopping in the 7-11 a block away from a birthday party to buy a card. Also, in terms of delivering the content: Mr. Caffo needs to structure his slide/video arrangements so that he is not standing in front of the text. Think of it from the point of view of somebody wanting to listen and read at the same time. | Also, in terms of delivering the | Content | Mr. Caffo needs to structure his | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | The course content was very brief and well structured, Regression being a rather vast topic demands a lot more time. 4 weeks seemed a bit less! Overall satisfied by what the course offered. | The course | Content | was very brief and well structured, | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | The flows of courses instructed by Caffo(Statistical Inference and Regression Models) are too long to concentrate it and the quiz is not quite related in lecture. However, Contents of the book is really good, as well as homework in the book. | not quite related in lecture. However, | Content | of the book is really good, | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | Appears more like a revision for those who already know the content than geared towards those new to the subject. | for those who already know the | Content | than geared towards those new to | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | There's just something about the course content that is difficult to attain. It's presented at way too high of a level without enough tangible examples of getting down into the weeds of how to actually perform and interpret the models and functions. | There's just something about the course | Content | that is difficult to attain. It's | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | Loved the course and the content. Only critique is that I would have liked to have a lecture about transformations, and interpretation of transformed data coefficients. | Loved the course and the | Content | Only critique is that I would | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | This course goes on a very fast pace and simply does not have the charm of all the other courses in the specialization. I understand that a lot of content is covered within a month, but there should be supplementary course material available. Moreover, TAs should be more active on the forums. I have seen most of the questions just being discussed among the students. A little disappointed. Will probably have to watch all the material again to have confidence with it. | I understand that a lot of | Content | is covered within a month, but | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| b75Wh7MYEeWKaQ6n__gsuQ | Good course , could be made better ! content is good and simple ! | , could be made better ! | Content | is good and simple ! | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| Bg6XXXVJEeWKxgq26fqTNQ | it was a very good content with high level of knowledge | it was a very good | Content | with high level of knowledge | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Good, however the instructor videos could be better in content. | instructor videos could be better in | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Again the content and presentation is great. But the web site is getting really annoying, especially in the assignment area. The editor is faulty and on the submission on visualization you cannot use visualizations(!) to make your point due to technical limitations (can't paste charts or screenshots).Sometimes verification does not work. Support is sometimes very good, sometimes useless, depends with whom you chat. | Again the | Content | and presentation is great. But the | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | This course hardly has any new content and a lot of it is also repeat from previous courses. | This course hardly has any new | Content | and a lot of it is | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | I liked the 5 highlights per lesson - it helped recap the most important content. | it helped recap the most important | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | I am not impressed with this course so far. The quizzes and assignments are out of order with the materials being presented - the questions on each come from readings and lecture content that have not been introduced to the audience at that particular point in the course. The first module was a very, very basic outline of a generic analysis process, and really has nothing to do with digital marketing analytics in particular. | each come from readings and lecture | Content | that have not been introduced to | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Great content and well presented by the lecturer connecting to the previous module. | Great | Content | and well presented by the lecturer | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Hated the course and the content. I truly regret investing my money on this course. | Hated the course and the | Content | I truly regret investing my money | Negative | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Fantastic content, gives me a better understanding of the methodology which I was missing. I had a few problems with the platform, but managed to work after a few days. | Fantastic | Content | gives me a better understanding of | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| bIkXsq9HEeSmzyIAC0yFng | I was disappointed because the name is misleading. The course provides a good introduction & overview of the responsibilities of the CTO, but has very little specifically digital content. It deals with two-speed IT in a single short lecture, so of course the treatment is superficial. It is easy to find more in-depth material freely available, on the McKinsey website for example. | but has very little specifically digital | Content | It deals with two-speed IT in | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| bIkXsq9HEeSmzyIAC0yFng | Super content. I'll definitely re-do the course | Super | Content | I'll definitely re-do the course | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| bIkXsq9HEeSmzyIAC0yFng | Is there any reason why you should not apply the course by BCG?) It's content is pretty unique and includes a high level analysis and a wide range of knowledge needed to cover all detailed aspects. Best regards, Oleg Serov | the course by BCG? ) It's | Content | is pretty unique and includes a | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| bIkXsq9HEeSmzyIAC0yFng | Good content, but the course setting does (at least for me) not allow learn the content long term due to missing reading material. | Good | Content | but the course setting does (at | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| bIkXsq9HEeSmzyIAC0yFng | Good content, but the course setting does (at least for me) not allow learn the content long term due to missing reading material. | for me) not allow learn the | Content | long term due to missing reading | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| bIkXsq9HEeSmzyIAC0yFng | The course content is quite good, though it could have been deeper in some areas. But its peer review system is not working well, if at all. Regards, An Le. | The course | Content | is quite good, though it could | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| BJXF0TLTEeSasiIACxClrQ | Well structured in terms of content and the basic framework. But the delivery is dull. Yes, I know it is Phys Chem but I do think there must be ways to Jazz it up. Gave up after Week 6, so I cannot comment on the whole course. | Well structured in terms of | Content | and the basic framework. But the | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Great content and professor. I recommend it. | Great | Content | and professor. I recommend it. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Very good content and methodology. | Very good | Content | and methodology. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Very good! I really like the contents and the style of this course! Highly recommended!! | Very good! I really like the | Content | and the style of this course! | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Good content, feels very automated | Good | Content | feels very automated | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| BkWivH6zEeSXPiIACxeBkA | Great, actual and interesting content. Excellent professor. It really gives you another insight, perspectives and different ways of thinking about the traditional management practice. Never keep questioning, is one (in many) of the most important lessons that you can take from this course. Recommended! | Great, actual and interesting | Content | Excellent professor. It really gives you | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| BPAnFSl4EeWbhg7tBrEPHw | The content of the course is very interesting. The final task could be more ambitious, however - just to inspire greatness. | The | Content | of the course is very interesting. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | The videos are beautifully edited and interesting to watch. There's a good amount of information, without making the course overwhelming. The assignments are clear and focused on the content. | are clear and focused on the | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Loved it. Great content. Userful assignments. Most importantly, kept it interesting. Thank you. | Loved it. Great | Content | Userful assignments. Most importantly, kept it | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Very interesting topic, but even for an introductory course not nearly enough to justify a full 4 week course for € 71! The first course, Fundamentals of Graphic Design, had more content, more (optional) assignments, and covered Typography, too. | Fundamentals of Graphic Design, had more | Content | more (optional) assignments, and covered Typography, | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | The course gives fundamentals of typography in a clear and very interesting way. I adore the structure of the course and the lector's speech. The content is extremely useful. Every designer and editor should know those things. Mostly they don't even if they think they do. | course and the lector's speech. The | Content | is extremely useful. Every designer and | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | This class gave a great introduction to Typography! The instructor did a great job at bringing Typography to life. The content of the course was very approachable. | at bringing Typography to life. The | Content | of the course was very approachable. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | It was extremely high level. I would have appreciated more content in the videos. | level. I would have appreciated more | Content | in the videos. | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | This class taught me a lot about the basics of typography, however I didn't feel too encouraged creatively compared to the last class in this series. I understand that type is a bit more structured and requires more attention to detail and rules than other forms of visual art, but I wish there was a bit more content similar to the content in week 4 where we are encouraged to get creative. | wish there was a bit more | Content | similar to the content in week | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | This class taught me a lot about the basics of typography, however I didn't feel too encouraged creatively compared to the last class in this series. I understand that type is a bit more structured and requires more attention to detail and rules than other forms of visual art, but I wish there was a bit more content similar to the content in week 4 where we are encouraged to get creative. | bit more content similar to the | Content | in week 4 where we are | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Nice, brief intro to typography. Good, clear lecture content and interesting assignments. I feel like the "by the book" assignment should not be entirely peer graded. | intro to typography. Good, clear lecture | Content | and interesting assignments. I feel like | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| Bq5Eo50bEeW_wArffOXkOw | Great content provided by great & dedicated man! | Great | Content | provided by great & dedicated man! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Bq5Eo50bEeW_wArffOXkOw | Clear but the content is a bit too simple. Need to include more real world scenario and application. | Clear but the | Content | is a bit too simple. Need | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| Bq5Eo50bEeW_wArffOXkOw | Learning finance with Prof. Kaul was so much fun. Loved the anecdotes, and the bits and pieces of elderly advice interwoven into the course lectures. The course content as well as assignments were well structured, and had the right level of difficulty. I must admit that the difficulty level for the assignments was higher than what I had expected, and it took some time to figure out how to apply the concepts learned in class to the real world problems in the assignments. But I am glad this was the case, because that kept me on my toes. Thank you Prof. Kaul and Coursera for this awesome class, and for rekindling my passion for Finance. | into the course lectures. The course | Content | as well as assignments were well | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Bq5Eo50bEeW_wArffOXkOw | Enjoyed the content, but wish there was better assistance in working through problems. The message boards have not hit the mark, but I will make a better effort in these next module | Enjoyed the | Content | but wish there was better assistance | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | very nice course . For me the content is very dense , I end up watching videos twice . It is challenging. I just love it . Feels like stop doing anything just learn scala :-) | nice course . For me the | Content | is very dense , I end | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Great course, very informative and well structured. Content is explained in a very clean and building-up mode. This course fits the intermediate level quite well. | course, very informative and well structured. | Content | is explained in a very clean | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | I really enjoyed this course, the assignments are challenging and well designed. The course content is really relevant for those who want to learn the principles of functional programming. | challenging and well designed. The course | Content | is really relevant for those who | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Content is not updated. Now is 2016. | | Content | is not updated. Now is 2016. | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Very helpful course for beginners, and congratulations for putting up such a great work together! But a few suggestions - 1) Most importantly, the assignments were very VERY hard for starters in functional programming and Scala. It would be much more enjoyable to many more if it's made a little easier. 2) The content was great, but I believe a little more (both in breadth and depth) was needed to be covered. Moreover the categorization can be rethought and a little re-organized. Nevertheless, a great course! Will surely recommend this one. | made a little easier. 2) The | Content | was great, but I believe a | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | The content is great! But the rearrangement of lectures is not synced with intros at the beginning of some videos. I know it takes a lot of time and effort to make or alter a video. After all it doesn't affect much. | The | Content | is great! But the rearrangement of | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | This course is a little bit difficult to get started with if you do not have any code experience. However, it is a really great course because the content is sufficient but not too much and the course is clear enough. The last two assignments are tough for me and they took me a long time to figure out, also I read a number of materials about Scala functions on Internet. This is the first course that I finished and I really like this course. | a really great course because the | Content | is sufficient but not too much | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | The only attractive thing in this course is a name of the author. The course itself is poorly designed, homework is hardly connected to the content of lectures. Might be interesting as an introduction for Scala newcomers, though. | homework is hardly connected to the | Content | of lectures. Might be interesting as | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | This is a great course for learning Functional Programming language. All the course content including Assignments are up to the mark. I thank the tutors for providing such great information. | Functional Programming language. All the course | Content | including Assignments are up to the | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Helps very well through the installation of the software required for the course and the course content is also sufficient. | for the course and the course | Content | is also sufficient. | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Great Content. Please keep up the good work. | Great | Content | Please keep up the good work. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | I am a statistician who works primarily with R, with some Python for the things Python is better for. I know how to program, but I explicitly note I am not a computer science student. I have only limited experience with the command prompt. I was very excited when I heard about this course, but the amount of work and frustration just to get started programming in Scala has been obscene. I am very, very glad I decided to check out the course for free before paying for the specialization. The course has a lot of required software. The tutorials to get this software often involve "You need this, but so save time we're going to skip showing you how to get it. If it doesn't work, you need to install it." There is a lot of variability in OSs. Many errors are often encountered. There is no help. Among the things the course requires are two (three?) IDEs for Scala (I note the video tutorials says you just need some sort of IDE... but you need IntelliJ, and Eclipse to submit...). The guides show how to get started on a Mac. The software is not the same on Windows, and so 'step by step instructions' become a guessing game, because many options or menus are missing or different. There are many better and more friendly guides on the internet. I may return to the transcripts of the course content here, but I won't be submitting any coursework. I'm going to warn my colleagues away as well. Forget Coursera - I'll just buy a book and work through it like everyone else I know. | to the transcripts of the course | Content | here, but I won't be submitting | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Course content and the way of explanation is awesome | Course | Content | and the way of explanation is | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| bT0Wwd7yEeWlNQ4GEaPmcw | This course is very exciting. I love the contents and the instructors. Great. | is very exciting. I love the | Content | and the instructors. Great. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| bTYGrDVuEeW6RApRXdjJPw | The course had some great general UI content, and a nice final project tying persistent Core Data into a TableView providing useful experience and boilerplate code for future projects. | course had some great general UI | Content | and a nice final project tying | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| bTYGrDVuEeW6RApRXdjJPw | Grade A for the content, format and professors! Thankyou all!! | Grade A for the | Content | format and professors! Thankyou all! ! | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| bu-bs9_HEeSNQCIAC2-J5Q | Excellent course. It's perfect to get a solid base to learn music. The explanations are clear, the progression of the contents is easy to follow. I highly recommend it. Thank | are clear, the progression of the | Content | is easy to follow. I highly | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| BuO0neR5EeWYOBIRup69HQ | In my opinion this is not a course. The contents are a short interview cut up over 4 weeks, fluffed with a myriad of vendor-biased PDFs. The 90s classroom style video editing is annoying to boot. | this is not a course. The | Content | are a short interview cut up | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| bV6GUWEbEeSceSIACy-PDA | The contents of this course will be familiar to anyone who reads popular science books. The course is useful mainly for pulling various strands together, but don't expect much depth. | The | Content | of this course will be familiar | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| bV6GUWEbEeSceSIACy-PDA | I am deeply satisfied with the course . It was my priviledge to study from the professor. Sir Hitoshi Murayama was amazing . He lectures were wonderful. Course contents were nicely organised . I want to thank the professor and of course, Coursera team for providing long distance education to the ones who look for it. | . He lectures were wonderful. Course | Content | were nicely organised . I want | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| bV6GUWEbEeSceSIACy-PDA | Excellent content in simple words. Many Thanks to Tokyo University. | Excellent | Content | in simple words. Many Thanks to | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| bV6GUWEbEeSceSIACy-PDA | Nice course overall. On B-mode polarization, the recent results from the BICEP2 observatory was something that I expected to feature in the course content. | expected to feature in the course | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| bV6GUWEbEeSceSIACy-PDA | very good course, although the very beginning is very basic. exceeded expectations. I would have liked it to have the video transcripts, as i like to have another source for learning and understanding the contents. i liked the professor and his attitude. i think some things are left kind of unanswered or implicit, which for someone who is not directly involved with the subject confuse me. maybe Q&A sessions with the professor would also be a good idea besides the recommended transcripts. overall it was very good | source for learning and understanding the | Content | i liked the professor and his | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| bzhAuJ9sEeWJORITtzkPnQ | Great course and content delivery was outstanding | Great course and | Content | delivery was outstanding | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| bzhAuJ9sEeWJORITtzkPnQ | Excellent eye-opening content. | Excellent eye-opening | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| bzhAuJ9sEeWJORITtzkPnQ | The course is very practically-oriented and the quizzes are actually designed so that the learner can make a strong emphasis on the weekly content. | a strong emphasis on the weekly | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| bzhAuJ9sEeWJORITtzkPnQ | Good lecture and content | Good lecture and | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| bzhAuJ9sEeWJORITtzkPnQ | Excellent, well presented content that challenges you to think of how Alternative management concepts can be applied in your current workplace as well as what the company of the future is likely to look like | Excellent, well presented | Content | that challenges you to think of | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| bzhAuJ9sEeWJORITtzkPnQ | Course content was very good, easy to follow. Julian made it quite interesting and insightful for managers who see change as the only constant and want to get the best out of their workplace. Really enjoyed the course. Looking forward to other courses from Julian | Course | Content | was very good, easy to follow. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | I like the course content but the presenter needs to have a more friendly way to present it. | I like the course | Content | but the presenter needs to have | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | The extra/outside content provided is great. As others have stated, but clearly not adjusted, some of the quiz questions aren't clear items covered in the material (which is frustrating). | The extra/outside | Content | provided is great. As others have | Positive | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Overly-remedial information, but that is not what earns this course such a poor evaluation from me. The poor evaluation comes from the composition of the review quizzes: The end-of-section quizzes ask questions to which there can be more than one correct answer, yet only a single response will receive credit. Example: "A recommended solution to a problem is valued by an executive because..." Followed by four possible answers: One of which is clearly incorrect while one makes an awful assumption. These two choices can be eliminated easily. However, the final two options are BOTH UNARGUABLY CORRECT, but only one was briefly mentioned in the material (reading or video), and thus only that one receives credit. Unfortunately, this demonstrates the course creators' desire to value a student's memorization of the instructor's own unique words over the student's assimilation of the course content and ideas. Course-takers beware, this course seems more tailored to stroking Ms. Bravo's ego than to you actually learning anything of commercial value. | the student's assimilation of the course | Content | and ideas. Course-takers beware, this course | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | The content of the course was good. Lectures were effective. I specially liked the last statement after every lecture "where ever you may be have a great time" | The | Content | of the course was good. Lectures | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Nicely fine-tuned content -- relevant to multiple settings and spaces of work. | Nicely fine-tuned | Content | -- relevant to multiple settings and | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | I think the teacher was very welcoming, but the content was less than enough to answer the quizzes. In the quizzes, every answer choice was correct and there wasn't any possible way to discern. What the teacher said and complemented with the lectures didn't match with the question answers. So, my score is "2". | teacher was very welcoming, but the | Content | was less than enough to answer | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Great course, but really short. Could have more content! :) | but really short. Could have more | Content | :) | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Not enough videos. Content very generic. | Not enough videos. | Content | very generic. | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | A good introduction to Workplace Communication. The resources supplied were extremely helpful. I didn't pay so much attention to the slides that came with this - in fact, I'm not even sure how relevant they are looking back. I had expected the overview videos to be an insight to the resource content, but it wasn't quite compiled that way. The tests could have been longer, and perhaps could have contained obvious solutions - in some instances the solutions provided were all applicable, leaving the student to select the best option. In other instances the options available weren't even discussed in the content, confusing the student. | be an insight to the resource | Content | but it wasn't quite compiled that | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | A good introduction to Workplace Communication. The resources supplied were extremely helpful. I didn't pay so much attention to the slides that came with this - in fact, I'm not even sure how relevant they are looking back. I had expected the overview videos to be an insight to the resource content, but it wasn't quite compiled that way. The tests could have been longer, and perhaps could have contained obvious solutions - in some instances the solutions provided were all applicable, leaving the student to select the best option. In other instances the options available weren't even discussed in the content, confusing the student. | available weren't even discussed in the | Content | confusing the student. | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| C-Eq4BUkEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | I found this course extremely helpful,well structured and thoroughly informative.The content of each module I viewed, added up to my already acquired knowledge from my studies in theology.To me it was a link to everything I have learned so far about Kierkegaard and has basically completed the picture.Congratulations and many thanks! | well structured and thoroughly informative. The | Content | of each module I viewed, added | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| C-Eq4BUkEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Excellent course, could be a bit harder on quizzing, it was too easy to pass them, but, it compensates with the final essay. It has great content | the final essay. It has great | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| C-Eq4BUkEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Very informative, educational and well=organized. The professor communicates the lesson clearly and effectively in maintaining one's interest in the course content. I recommend this course to anyone interested in learning about subjective truth, how to be self-seeking, the Socratic Method, and a unique method for challenging traditional thought. | maintaining one's interest in the course | Content | I recommend this course to anyone | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| C-Eq4BUkEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | A wonderful course, well presented, a pleasure to undertake. the videos were superb, the content stimulating and encouraged me to read more about Kierkegaard. One of the best MOOC's I have taken. Keep up this incredibly high standard pls | undertake. the videos were superb, the | Content | stimulating and encouraged me to read | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| C-Eq4BUkEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | I loved the manner in which the course contents were delivered. The course teacher know the art of articulation. He knows how to teach complex ideas in a simple manner without loosing its essence of the argument. I was so immersed in his lecture, one full night I watched his lecture and finished 80% course material. I wish I could deliver a lecture like it. A big salute to an inspiring teacher. | the manner in which the course | Content | were delivered. The course teacher know | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| C-WALZ3LEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | This is a great course! I have worked in the Operations sides of the business and this course gave me much need perspective into the corporate finance and account domains. Thank you to the two Professors involved. Great content and easy to follow and understand the reasoning and the why. | to the two Professors involved. Great | Content | and easy to follow and understand | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| C-WALZ3LEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | Two professors gave very clear instructions in the course. It's much easy for foreign students to understand the course. It's a little bit essential againt the topic decision making because of the major of content is basic of financial management. | making because of the major of | Content | is basic of financial management. | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| c8dPVxUQEeWpKw4zIcjkHw | Poor content | Poor | Content | | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| c9w_wD0cEeS9XCIAC0GF3g | Jim Fowler is a great professor! Would love to see more content from him! :D | professor! Would love to see more | Content | from him! :D | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| c9w_wD0cEeS9XCIAC0GF3g | Again Jim does a really great job. Care and attention to the presentation of the explanation. Really takes into account he's performing for a camera not a lecture hall. My score is 4/4. I'm not qualified to give the 5th as I can't speak to what has been included and omitted from the content. Bring on multivariate calculus as an on-demand Mooc! | been included and omitted from the | Content | Bring on multivariate calculus as an | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | excellent content ,very useful | excellent | Content | , very useful | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | The content of the course is reasonable and gives an introduction to the uninitiated. The peer review sysetm however relies on the experience and knowledge of others which is a flaw in how some of the coursera modules are evaluated. If you are looking to expand your technical knowledge, opt for a course the has an automated test system (such as the courses on Data Structures and Algorithms). If you are just considering studying engineering, this course and specialization will be a decent and simplistic introduction into the field. | The | Content | of the course is reasonable and | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | The course content and intro about IoT is very good and interesting. This course will provide an opportunity to explore new generation intelligent devices. | The course | Content | and intro about IoT is very | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Very good, with relevant content to nowadays. | Very good, with relevant | Content | to nowadays. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Very good content, clear and effective way to explain the core concepts. | Very good | Content | clear and effective way to explain | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | This course is OK for introduction if you're not already familiar with the IoT devices and embedded systems. But if you already have done some projects in IoT and Embedded systems and are familiar with what they are then you don't need this course. This course is designed for a complete beginner who doesn't have any idea what IoT and embedded systems are (and now that you're researching about a course on IoT you probably have an idea what they are) and as a guy who had already done some projects in this area in undergrad, I found the content to be very simple and lacking any new things to add to my knowledge. But if you are a complete beginner then go for it. | area in undergrad, I found the | Content | to be very simple and lacking | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Nice work, excellent content as well as faculty. Keep it up. | Nice work, excellent | Content | as well as faculty. Keep it | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Course is very well structured and content is really easy to digest! Really liked the short video where actual components were shown in the instructor's lab. Made it easy to connect theoretical concepts with real-life stuff. | Course is very well structured and | Content | is really easy to digest! Really | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Not only very interesting but also an instructor with entertaining way of communicating the content. | with entertaining way of communicating the | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | This is very good introduction to Internet of Things domain. Specially the content related to components of embedded, IoT devices and Protocols. | Internet of Things domain. Specially the | Content | related to components of embedded, IoT | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Excellent pedagogy, and concise, comprehensive and engaging content! | pedagogy, and concise, comprehensive and engaging | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Excellent Content and excellent domain of the topic by the Professor. | Excellent | Content | and excellent domain of the topic | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Content is very light but it is good for an absolute beginner. | | Content | is very light but it is | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Nice introduction to the IoT world. Course contents are a bit repetitive and lessons could have been a bit shorter. | introduction to the IoT world. Course | Content | are a bit repetitive and lessons | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | I thought the content was great, but I thought the assignments were too onerous. I did the first one, but I didn't feel like I learned from it and peer feedback was very slow. I looked at the other assignments, but I thought they only asked me to put to paper things I was already thinking about anyway. Given the untimely and low quality of peer feedback on the first assignment, I didn't feel like I'd learn anything from completing and submitting any assignments. I refuse to buy a webcam for Coursera (I have a phone with that capability but the Coursera app doesn't support it for identity verification), so I can't get a certification anyway. I thought the content was interesting, but too basic to pay for. The major value I see in the certification path is extensive feedback on the capstone project, as I thought peer feedback came too late and wasn't extensive enough to be valuable. I do think the instructor does a good job of presenting the content | I thought the | Content | was great, but I thought the | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | I thought the content was great, but I thought the assignments were too onerous. I did the first one, but I didn't feel like I learned from it and peer feedback was very slow. I looked at the other assignments, but I thought they only asked me to put to paper things I was already thinking about anyway. Given the untimely and low quality of peer feedback on the first assignment, I didn't feel like I'd learn anything from completing and submitting any assignments. I refuse to buy a webcam for Coursera (I have a phone with that capability but the Coursera app doesn't support it for identity verification), so I can't get a certification anyway. I thought the content was interesting, but too basic to pay for. The major value I see in the certification path is extensive feedback on the capstone project, as I thought peer feedback came too late and wasn't extensive enough to be valuable. I do think the instructor does a good job of presenting the content | a certification anyway. I thought the | Content | was interesting, but too basic to | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | I thought the content was great, but I thought the assignments were too onerous. I did the first one, but I didn't feel like I learned from it and peer feedback was very slow. I looked at the other assignments, but I thought they only asked me to put to paper things I was already thinking about anyway. Given the untimely and low quality of peer feedback on the first assignment, I didn't feel like I'd learn anything from completing and submitting any assignments. I refuse to buy a webcam for Coursera (I have a phone with that capability but the Coursera app doesn't support it for identity verification), so I can't get a certification anyway. I thought the content was interesting, but too basic to pay for. The major value I see in the certification path is extensive feedback on the capstone project, as I thought peer feedback came too late and wasn't extensive enough to be valuable. I do think the instructor does a good job of presenting the content | a good job of presenting the | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Really crisp content as introduction to world of IoT. MANET's, network layer sessions are very informative. | Really crisp | Content | as introduction to world of IoT. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | This class is an extreme example of an introduction to a subject - very basic information. I would guess that anyone who actually knows the term "Internet of Things" and was able to find this course already knows all of the content presented here. For completeness and ensuring that everyone is on the same page, I suppose it it required. I took off one star for how basic, yet drawn-out the information is (it could have been covered in a single week). The other two stars came off because of how tedious the peer-review assignments are and how little they add to the understanding of the content (it is not hard to understand, so the assignment ends up just being busy work). The two stars I gave were because the instructor seems knowledgable and the rest of the specialization looks promising. | course already knows all of the | Content | presented here. For completeness and ensuring | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | This class is an extreme example of an introduction to a subject - very basic information. I would guess that anyone who actually knows the term "Internet of Things" and was able to find this course already knows all of the content presented here. For completeness and ensuring that everyone is on the same page, I suppose it it required. I took off one star for how basic, yet drawn-out the information is (it could have been covered in a single week). The other two stars came off because of how tedious the peer-review assignments are and how little they add to the understanding of the content (it is not hard to understand, so the assignment ends up just being busy work). The two stars I gave were because the instructor seems knowledgable and the rest of the specialization looks promising. | add to the understanding of the | Content | (it is not hard to understand, | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great content and I like the peer graded assignments the most. | Great | Content | and I like the peer graded | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Thanks a lot for putting together the course content so neatly. It was a good course. | lot for putting together the course | Content | so neatly. It was a good | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | very clear content , easy to follow and understand . first step in the word of javascript thank you so much | very clear | Content | , easy to follow and understand | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I loved it! Colleen explains everything very well. The pace is perfect, not that slow that it becomes boring, but not that fast, that you cannot catch up to the content. I learned a lot, and so far, the best specialization in web design on courser :) I'm very glad I could take the courses!! | you cannot catch up to the | Content | I learned a lot, and so | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Teacher's narrative is pretty clear, easy to follow. good for beginners. But the course content is very simple, somewhat too simple for the course title, it only touches on very very basic of javascript. | good for beginners. But the course | Content | is very simple, somewhat too simple | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very limited content. Not possible to complete the projects at the end. -( | Very limited | Content | Not possible to complete the projects | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| cKvqIUXWEeSAFiIACyyIrg | Some course content are not updated (links not working). Very few people in discussions. Didn't see TAs. I had some questions on the forum but not answered. | Some course | Content | are not updated (links not working). | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| ClCx1sbdEeShXyIAC5MC2w | Excellent content very well set out | Excellent | Content | very well set out | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| ClCx1sbdEeShXyIAC5MC2w | A great introduction to the variety of knowledge and skills a first year veterinary student encounters. Found the content regarding animal care, body systems and clinical skills interesting. | year veterinary student encounters. Found the | Content | regarding animal care, body systems and | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| ClCx1sbdEeShXyIAC5MC2w | good course, but did not understand some of the content in week 2 | did not understand some of the | Content | in week 2 | Negative | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| ClCx1sbdEeShXyIAC5MC2w | Good course and quite plain with materials and important content for learning from that course. Good teachers and very well explain. | quite plain with materials and important | Content | for learning from that course. Good | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Cn3HgzTdEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This course is beyond abundant in great information. However, there is almost too much information to take in , and absolutely too much information to be able to study in just and hour a day. It needs to be stretched out into 6 weeks instead of 4 to accommodate those with an already busy schedule. For example, one 8 minute video might require an allotment of one hour to properly glean all the provided information. You will need to take notes on almost every word spoken so the pattern will be hit play, pause write out the last couple of sentences (the instructor speaks very quickly), hit play , pause and repeat until the end of the video and then re-watch it in order to absorb everything as one. And beware, in the peer reviews you will need to bullet and highlight EVERY point required extremely specifically in order to get full credit. For example, for the first essay, I wrote it out in ESSAY form as was specified and had all of the required points written out exactly how it was instructed. However, because I did not put into a basic outline form, I received a failed score. I resubmitted the EXACT same content in bullet-ed and highlighted form (which was NOT what was assigned) and miraculously received 100%. | score. I resubmitted the EXACT same | Content | in bullet-ed and highlighted form (which | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Congratulations! I really appreciate the classes and the course content. The videos are very objective and synthesizes, in a cleaver way, hart English knowledge. | appreciate the classes and the course | Content | The videos are very objective and | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | I am Brazilian, and I have been studying English since 2011 as a second language. So far, I have not found I course like Grammar and Punctuation. What makes the difference is that it explains the content in a simple way so that students can learn easily. Besides, I learned things on the lecture videos that I had not learned until then. | difference is that it explains the | Content | in a simple way so that | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | It's a good course with some interesting resources. Most of the practice resources use Flash and one of the assignment submissions is inconsistent with the other submission formats. The content of the course itself is 4.5 stars. For me there is one element that I wish had an explanation or somewhere to ask about it. Instead I'll need to search the internet for an answer and hope what I find is correct! | with the other submission formats. The | Content | of the course itself is 4. | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | very good content | very good | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good course, although no proctor or supervision at all. No place to go for questions or help. Please be aware this is primarily designed for non-native english speakers. This was not clear to me when I joined. And although the content is thorough, it is dull and the assignments uninspiring. If you want to know more about grammar, good (be sure to bone up through, because she assumes a lot about what you might remember from high school and for those of us over 40 ... hmmm). If you want to feel inspired to write something of value and interest to yourself or others, not so good. Over all I would not recommend this course or series of courses. And would suggest seeking out a course that has some kind of proctor or supervisory help available. | when I joined. And although the | Content | is thorough, it is dull and | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | There's some room for improvement, that's for sure. The last video was really bad, not because of the content, but because the Professor was very sloppy in her speaking. I also think there should be more practice exercises and a better way to know if the answers were correct. But overall, was very happy with it. | really bad, not because of the | Content | but because the Professor was very | Negative | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Excellent course to refresh the English Grammar and its Punctuation. An overview to students who want to understand the fundamentals of the English Language and utilize the content as a reference for upcoming studies. | the English Language and utilize the | Content | as a reference for upcoming studies. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | I love to review through grammar and i saw the content of the course is posted clearly, easy, encourage every classmate interact with each other and so convinient for everyone can learn anytime they want! | through grammar and i saw the | Content | of the course is posted clearly, | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | well designed course that is rich in content. | designed course that is rich in | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Contents are interesting and useful, even if the course deals with few topics. I think it is too expensive! A good grammar book is cheaper and more complete. I would not enroll this course anymore. | | Content | are interesting and useful, even if | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good Content and Clear explanation. | Good | Content | and Clear explanation. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This course's content and delivery are excellent. This gave proper understanding of grammar and punctuation usage. Many a times, I used to believe, I properly use punctuation, but this course set the scores right. Thanks a lot for such an extraordinary course. | This course's | Content | and delivery are excellent. This gave | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Hello, The overall content or education on English grammar was good. It made me to correct lot of things which I used to find difficult or project it wrong. Thank you for educating me correctly. Appreciate your work. | Hello, The overall | Content | or education on English grammar was | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good contents and practise question to help understand the knowledge and concept. | Good | Content | and practise question to help understand | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Simple: Thank you for your effort. Compound : From now, I will observe when ever i read books, paper, or blog, and i will daily practice writing. Complex : Because the Instructor made the content structure vey well, made me easy to follow and understand. | : Because the Instructor made the | Content | structure vey well, made me easy | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | I found this course practical and straightforward. After I took the pretest, I found that the contents were targeted towards me. I would recommend this course to anyone who would like to know some rules and structure to improve the professionalism of their writing. | the pretest, I found that the | Content | were targeted towards me. I would | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Well structured and good content. very helpful | Well structured and good | Content | very helpful | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good content, but without a creative didatic. | Good | Content | but without a creative didatic. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Short course. Please add more content to it. | Short course. Please add more | Content | to it. | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | What a great refresher course! The professor really simplified the content into a format that was easily understood. | course! The professor really simplified the | Content | into a format that was easily | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great videos, interesting content. Quizzes were good, assignments were clearly stated. There could have probably been more coding work involved, but it is definitely a good first course as an introduction to programming in general. | Great videos, interesting | Content | Quizzes were good, assignments were clearly | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | An excellent course that is so easy to follow and comprehend. It has everything that a beginner needs. Wonderful teachers and very good content. I really enjoyed this course. Thank you so much! | needs. Wonderful teachers and very good | Content | I really enjoyed this course. Thank | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Although I have been studying programming for four years, this course still managed to surprise me in terms of content offered - really interested for the image editing and formatting from HTML and JS. Really worth the money!! | to surprise me in terms of | Content | offered - really interested for the | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Lessons are too compact and some of the videos too long and full of content, so it's hard to process all the information at once. | videos too long and full of | Content | so it's hard to process all | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good overall but the content uses library and other content that make it hard to apply the technologies to the real world, an emphasis on orienting the content to 'from scratch development' would be duly appreciated I think. Nevertheless interesting and well presented over all. | Good overall but the | Content | uses library and other content that | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good overall but the content uses library and other content that make it hard to apply the technologies to the real world, an emphasis on orienting the content to 'from scratch development' would be duly appreciated I think. Nevertheless interesting and well presented over all. | the content uses library and other | Content | that make it hard to apply | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good overall but the content uses library and other content that make it hard to apply the technologies to the real world, an emphasis on orienting the content to 'from scratch development' would be duly appreciated I think. Nevertheless interesting and well presented over all. | world, an emphasis on orienting the | Content | to 'from scratch development' would be | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I learnt a lot of new information and I found the course content easy to understand and follow. | information and I found the course | Content | easy to understand and follow. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | okay for an intro, not the most boring content. It is a bit aweful that the insist on you using their libraries and programming environments. You spend perhaps 20% of your actually practicing coding, and the rest is wasted in libraries you will never use again | an intro, not the most boring | Content | It is a bit aweful that | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Granted it's an online course so there's not the back and forth provided at a physical classroom. However, the presentation of content is efficient and if an individual puts in enough time and effort, they'll get what they're looking from with this course. | physical classroom. However, the presentation of | Content | is efficient and if an individual | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Everything apart from Steganography was well explained with examples. I liked that the quizzes were fairly engaging and required programming exercises to familiarize you with the content. | exercises to familiarize you with the | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The content of CSS and HTML are really good in this course, but the details about the JavaScript Code are not sufficient, this let me hard to understand the JavaScript. | The | Content | of CSS and HTML are really | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very poor content on Java Script. If you just started JS do not take this course. It will be too hard. | very poor | Content | on Java Script. If you just | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Quick introduction to HTML, CSS, and Javascript for beginners. Compactly organised content. Excellent course. | and Javascript for beginners. Compactly organised | Content | Excellent course. | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very poorly structured. Explanation and examples were not very helpful. should revamp the course content and video lectures (specially the steganography part). | very helpful. should revamp the course | Content | and video lectures (specially the steganography | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| D-kRGMhiEeSHHCIAC12q0A | I think this course is hepful.I like the content management and form design of the course.And I like the teaching style of the teacher. Thanks for this platform! | course is hepful. I like the | Content | management and form design of the | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| d086Bc9YEeSS_CIACzcAUg | Covered a broad range of religious beliefs about the afterlife. Solid overview of Darwin and evolution as well as good videos e.g. Dawkins, Hitchens, Harris. The videos of actual classroom delivery with students provided a realism to the online experience. Both profs. were excellent teachers with the necessary skills to handle sensitive topics. The course could be improved by more clearly written assignments. The content of these assignments was appropriate but the word structure was too vague and in some cases disjointed. Excellent course. Well done Rutgers. | by more clearly written assignments. The | Content | of these assignments was appropriate but | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| d086Bc9YEeSS_CIACzcAUg | The course offers a very interesting insight into soul beliefs and combines history, psychology and philosophy. The articulate lecturers and a well prepared material help to maintain the interest and understand the content. | maintain the interest and understand the | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| d0bq5PkAEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | I think the teacher should speak more clearly, he has a strong accent, however, the materials and contents in this lessons are pretty good. | strong accent, however, the materials and | Content | in this lessons are pretty good. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| d0bq5PkAEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | The course has a good content. I wish there was an active participation by the mentors on the discussion forum. | The course has a good | Content | I wish there was an active | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| d0bq5PkAEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | This is one of the best introductory courses on image processing. The lectures are very good and cover a large variety of topics. The only thing that I didn't like about this course is that the homework problems do not cover all the content. The programming problems should be designed to be more challenging. | problems do not cover all the | Content | The programming problems should be designed | Negative | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| d1WkxNf4EeSFEiIAC0CpYw | This course proved to be a waste of time. There was nothing about the structure and forms of the strong quartet, just "here's a good one to listen to." Almost complete devoid of intellectual content. | " Almost complete devoid of intellectual | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | Excellent content very well set out | Excellent | Content | very well set out | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | Opened my eyes a lot regarding the welfare of all kinds of animals and their situations. Really sad course content, but needed to show the severity of how bad it can be for an animal, and the ways being used to stop and protect them. | and their situations. Really sad course | Content | but needed to show the severity | Negative | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | Loved this course. It has really sparked my interest in learning more and building my small store of knowledge further. Good content, interesting lecturers, varied strands within overall subject. This is my second course run by Edinburgh University and I will certainly be looking for more. | small store of knowledge further. Good | Content | interesting lecturers, varied strands within overall | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | i found this a great overview of animal welfare, i enjoyed the videos, and found the questions relevant to the content. | found the questions relevant to the | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | It would be perfect if within the learning material is included in PDF files. The content is wonderful | is included in PDF files. The | Content | is wonderful | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | Informative and rational. Content stayed right in line with the objectives. Clearly outlined and discussed via lectures and informative readings. | Informative and rational. | Content | stayed right in line with the | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | Great.!!! But if the content would be more. I find it unfair for a topic of such importance to be given so less attention. People will also respect it if the content would be more than it is right now...!! | ! ! ! But if the | Content | would be more. I find it | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | Great.!!! But if the content would be more. I find it unfair for a topic of such importance to be given so less attention. People will also respect it if the content would be more than it is right now...!! | will also respect it if the | Content | would be more than it is | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | Fantastic course, well presented. Easy to take at your own pace, videos allow you to pause and rewind learning at any point. Excellent content, with knowledgeable presenters. Highly recommend | rewind learning at any point. Excellent | Content | with knowledgeable presenters. Highly recommend | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| d5HHlUTlEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | It was a pleasure to listen to Dr Lafayette explain not only what happened during the Civil Rights movement but also the background, the outcome and the philosophy of the people involved. This class has outstanding content and is a great source of reflections on our individual actions. | people involved. This class has outstanding | Content | and is a great source of | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Simply fantastic! the content is precise and very well explained. You should not miss this opportunity! | Simply fantastic! the | Content | is precise and very well explained. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | to me as a total newby in the topic the content was really interesting however, its presentation. well. I truly thank the teachers for bringing together the review of all the approaches. but the manner of presentation was so artificial I couldn't help thinking just - when will the real learning begin? without all the silly role plays? again, thanks, I tearned a lot from the course. but I did also struggle through it because of the teachers' manner of presentation | total newby in the topic the | Content | was really interesting however, its presentation. | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | amazing teachers, content, smooth learning curve. Very practical and useful knowledge for the classroom teacher. | amazing teachers, | Content | smooth learning curve. Very practical and | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Really wonderful course in many different ways..... how it was laid out, the instructors unique way of coverage, content provided, nature of assignment and of course Coursera platform adds that ease of use and trust-quotient.... I wonder if they can find some course on "speech analysis" or "acoustic phonetics" or "Praat programme". For language teachers this situate them quite nicely into framework of various language theories.... | the instructors unique way of coverage, | Content | provided, nature of assignment and of | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | This course is excellent. The teachers, the content, the duration, all is premium quality | course is excellent. The teachers, the | Content | the duration, all is premium quality | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | The high level of the content and the teachers able to inspire, are maybe the best reason to do this course. I never saw so good teachers as they have here and the ability to teach and give valuable information to the learners as done here. In another situation, this course should cost a lot of money. Thanks to professors Shane Dixon, Jessica Cinco and Justin. More than teach, you are able to inspire! | The high level of the | Content | and the teachers able to inspire, | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | the content should be presented more interesting. | the | Content | should be presented more interesting. | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | I loved this course. I loved the videos, I learned a lot from them. Dr. Dixon is an excellent teacher. The content of this course was awesome! Thanks! | Dixon is an excellent teacher. The | Content | of this course was awesome! Thanks! | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | This course is very undestandable, colorful, more than memorable! Still iy has very rich content. It's great! Great! Great! | memorable! Still iy has very rich | Content | It's great! Great! Great! | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Like the course before this one, Theories of Second Language Acquistion was exceptional. I love how the professors creatively distill very important facts and information in a format that is enjoyable and refreshing for students. I wish all Coursera Courses were carefully planned and presented like this course - how you present it is just as important as the content that you are presenting. | is just as important as the | Content | that you are presenting. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | The course content is perfect, however the rating system is kind of disappointing. First, the rating is very subjective, thus I might pay great efforts to my submission but get a grade below my expectation. Second, sometimes I can be busy on weekends thus I want to finish the peer review earlier on Friday, however, there might often be not enough submission to be reviewed, thus I am very pressured to do this with a exhausted mind and body in the evening on Sundays. Could I just pass if there's no other submission to review? | The course | Content | is perfect, however the rating system | Positive | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | II found this course extremely useful and intersting because there is a professional content in a exciting artistic mode of study,that involves you in a process and gets a high motivation. Thanks a lot Dr Shane, Jessica and Dr. Justin. I wish | intersting because there is a professional | Content | in a exciting artistic mode of | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | The lectures are intriguing and the content is superb! GREAT JOB! | The lectures are intriguing and the | Content | is superb! GREAT JOB! | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | It seems staff do not monitor, or address, issues posted repeatedly to the forum, especially in regards to the final test (part 2 of the specialty). The content of the course is great, and if someone with the authority to make changes when errors are detected and reported did care for the course I would have have rated the course higher. | (part 2 of the specialty). The | Content | of the course is great, and | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | A bit more challenging than the first Module, bit with the same great methodology to deliver the information and keep students engaged. The course content is clear and concise. Thank you! | and keep students engaged. The course | Content | is clear and concise. Thank you! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Interesting content. Interesting delivery. | Interesting | Content | Interesting delivery. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | The instructors' videos are hilarious, making the content memorable. Well worth paying for this course just for its comedic value alone. Unlike the first course in the specialization, which focused on students speaking through video recordings, the second course focuses on writing short answers to demonstrate comprehension. | instructors' videos are hilarious, making the | Content | memorable. Well worth paying for this | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | This course is so rich in content, and all this is delivered with great clarity and depth. Just wonderful! | This course is so rich in | Content | and all this is delivered with | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | This made a great start with the first week content. Hope better will come next :) | great start with the first week | Content | Hope better will come next :) | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Overall fantastic course with great content and homework assignments. The difficulty level was a little low, and the amount of work we were required to do was a little less than I wanted / expected. Sometimes the peer grading was not accurate, and I wish there had been more feedback in the discussion forums. | Overall fantastic course with great | Content | and homework assignments. The difficulty level | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Good lessons, interesting content. But media is a bit old fashioned, I missed more interactive activities and more modern videos. | Good lessons, interesting | Content | But media is a bit old | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Is a great introduction to HCD, it will provide you with a great starting point and a lot content to follow by yourself | great starting point and a lot | Content | to follow by yourself | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | In my opinion, the video lectures are phenomenal. Scott Klemmer does such a great job of created simple visuals to convey concepts. And he also has bulleted content that is very succinct. The exercises, too, are the right balance of challenging and fun. | concepts. And he also has bulleted | Content | that is very succinct. The exercises, | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Really good content. | Really good | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Great content, very well constructed assignments. Well done! | Great | Content | very well constructed assignments. Well done! | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Amazing! I am very pleased with the class and contents. I'm happy because I'm at the end of the degree in design and UI have a great weight on my last project in college. Thank you! :D | very pleased with the class and | Content | I'm happy because I'm at the | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Learned a lot from the course. I think I will come back to review the course contents, it is a lot more than 4 weeks to learn. | come back to review the course | Content | it is a lot more than | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | The content of this course is good but the production quality of the videos are not vary high. | The | Content | of this course is good but | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | the content was okay but I've faced technical issues at the website itself | the | Content | was okay but I've faced technical | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | I like the content of the course. However, there are some remarks I want to share. For one of the asssignments I have to create an accout on Soundcloud. I never used it before and do not understand why I should leave somewhere my personal data if I do not plan to use this service in the future. I assume it as direct manipulation and do not like it at all. | I like the | Content | of the course. However, there are | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Expecting more content like the actuall experience of creating wireframe. step by step and finally complete wireframe. | Expecting more | Content | like the actuall experience of creating | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Phenomenal course. The assignments are tough, and very insightful, doing a great job of educating the course content in a very applied and immediately useful way. The piece on heuristics is especially valuable. I will be applying what I learned here in my work regularly. Very satisfied with this course! | great job of educating the course | Content | in a very applied and immediately | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Very detailed and structured content. Is it possible to get printable content as well along with videos? | Very detailed and structured | Content | Is it possible to get printable | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Very detailed and structured content. Is it possible to get printable content as well along with videos? | Is it possible to get printable | Content | as well along with videos? | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| dh3wTQZNEeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | I don't see how the assignments would make me a more creative person. Some of the content was new and interesting but overall I din't think it was a good use of my time. | more creative person. Some of the | Content | was new and interesting but overall | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| dh3wTQZNEeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | There is some good content on creativity in this course, thoug it barely addresses problem solving. "Do something different" assingments were an interesting idea. Some content material is missing, including the link to a text that is needed to answer a quizz which will influence your final grade. Grading standards are weird: maximum grades are to be given to assignments performed in public, as if things done in private aren't creative; there are better ways to have someone get out of their comfort zone. Assingments request that you be photographed or filmed, and there is no disclaimer that your photos or your privacy will be protected. If you are an introvert or simply a person who values privacy, this is not the course for you. | There is some good | Content | on creativity in this course, thoug | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| dh3wTQZNEeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | There is some good content on creativity in this course, thoug it barely addresses problem solving. "Do something different" assingments were an interesting idea. Some content material is missing, including the link to a text that is needed to answer a quizz which will influence your final grade. Grading standards are weird: maximum grades are to be given to assignments performed in public, as if things done in private aren't creative; there are better ways to have someone get out of their comfort zone. Assingments request that you be photographed or filmed, and there is no disclaimer that your photos or your privacy will be protected. If you are an introvert or simply a person who values privacy, this is not the course for you. | assingments were an interesting idea. Some | Content | material is missing, including the link | Negative | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| dh3wTQZNEeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Presentation is a little dull, bit the content is really good! | is a little dull, bit the | Content | is really good! | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| dh3wTQZNEeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Not all the DSDs were useful, and some of the content is very dated (such is the nature of a MOOC that isn't maintained), but it was useful to learn about methodologies and tools to think creatively about issues and solving problems. | were useful, and some of the | Content | is very dated (such is the | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| DJfupMVPEeWLqBIulHpzDw | This course is great. It's obviously tougher than the Part 1, though not exactly a follow up on the first part, as it covers different areas. The course content is such that it did not become very statistics-oriented - and it had independent lectures by Nobel Prize winning economists too. It's very easy to use the jargon that the course is suited for the layman, which it probably is not, but it's designed for ready understanding by a novice in economics, and Prof Yoram and his team have done a great job in putting this together. Thoroughly enjoyed it, even though at times I did have misgivings that I may not be able to complete it. | it covers different areas. The course | Content | is such that it did not | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| DmetrPp5EeScaiIAC9WIJw | Great guide, easy to understand, very relevant content! | guide, easy to understand, very relevant | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| DmetrPp5EeScaiIAC9WIJw | The content in this course is a very good introduction to educational theory and practice. There is just one aspect I philosophically disagree with, yet this is a pivotal point in education. The course assumes that Education is a way to change behaviour (as an external factor) Yet I am more inclined to the philosophy of: Education is to lift man up from the animal state; and by this uplift man will change his own relationship with the world (internal factor). The theory and practice given in this course are still valuable though, regardless of this difference in viewpoint. | The | Content | in this course is a very | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| DmetrPp5EeScaiIAC9WIJw | The instructions for writing the essays were confusing. The content was also a bit scattered. It was a little bit dto summize the main points of each lesson. | writing the essays were confusing. The | Content | was also a bit scattered. It | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| DmetrPp5EeScaiIAC9WIJw | Certainly for self-teachers, disciplined people who want to go the extra step. Really nice contextualizing, not too difficult in terms of time or content but certainly stimulating. Forms a nice basis for continuous improvement and self -reflection for those of use who were not trained to do so in a more formal setting. | difficult in terms of time or | Content | but certainly stimulating. Forms a nice | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| dPkbnh6zEeWP0w4yK2369w | It was really good on content part. I really like the course material. It is going to help me in my current organization project development work. At the same time i want to explore other available courses on cyber security. | It was really good on | Content | part. I really like the course | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| dPkbnh6zEeWP0w4yK2369w | Found it very useful. The content is articulated very well and is substantiated with research work & survey. This gives me a way to objectively assess system from security point of view | Found it very useful. The | Content | is articulated very well and is | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| dPkbnh6zEeWP0w4yK2369w | Very useful content that can be used in our workplaces | Very useful | Content | that can be used in our | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| dPkbnh6zEeWP0w4yK2369w | Very good need more good content like this. | Very good need more good | Content | like this. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| dPkbnh6zEeWP0w4yK2369w | Awesome. I am genuinely exited that I actually took and finished this course. Great content, actionable and at some moments, eye opener. I totally recommend it. | took and finished this course. Great | Content | actionable and at some moments, eye | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| DPSL2G03EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | Short of content and engagement | Short of | Content | and engagement | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| DUIbAwrmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Good course, interesting content. | Good course, interesting | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| DUIbAwrmEeWhsgqB1eduww | The videos didn't work correctly (sound and subtitles). I suggest to fix the problems because it is hard to understand the content of the course if the problems reamin. | it is hard to understand the | Content | of the course if the problems | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| Dv10gNfIEeSALyIAC9SBuw | I didn´t like this course so much. Great part of the content is about mediation, arbitration and negotiations that are not sucessfully. I thought I´d see more about improving practices to negotiate and convince the other part in a negotiation. | so much. Great part of the | Content | is about mediation, arbitration and negotiations | Positive | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | great intro to the rest of the course content. Course material and external resources were relevant and gave good insight into SPM at a high level. | to the rest of the course | Content | Course material and external resources were | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Very useful course and excellent quality content. | Very useful course and excellent quality | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | I can't complete the course without passing the graded content, but I can't complete the graded content unless I pay money and upgrade. Not the purpose of thes courses. | the course without passing the graded | Content | but I can't complete the graded | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | I can't complete the course without passing the graded content, but I can't complete the graded content unless I pay money and upgrade. Not the purpose of thes courses. | but I can't complete the graded | Content | unless I pay money and upgrade. | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Nice introduction, although I don't see any reason to call this "a course", if it's less than 2 hours total (at least it felt that way) while we have to listen to an intro every 5 minutes of it. Would've rated it 2 stars based on the content, but the level of presentation was really good and I appreciate the effort. | it 2 stars based on the | Content | but the level of presentation was | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Excellent lessons and course content to get an overview of Software Product Management. | Excellent lessons and course | Content | to get an overview of Software | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | One of the best coursers I have seen on Coursera so far. The video production quality, course structure and content is extra ordinary compared to other courses that I've seen so far. | video production quality, course structure and | Content | is extra ordinary compared to other | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Content is very basic. I believe this can be useful for school graduates, but if you have at least a couple years of hands-on experience, you shouldn't find anything new. | | Content | is very basic. I believe this | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | I highly recommend this course. Easy to follow, good contents and great teaching methodology. It's an introductory course. | this course. Easy to follow, good | Content | and great teaching methodology. It's an | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Maybe not enough content to be a course. | Maybe not enough | Content | to be a course. | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | This is good content, but way too broad and general to be considered a proper introduction. The course was too easy for my taste to be considered worthy of a certification. | This is good | Content | but way too broad and general | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Very well structured course. Course content was simple to understand and rich enough to cover important aspects of the discipline. Well articulated and well delivered by the teachers. Would like to deep dive into other related topics and specifically looking forward to Scrum tools and techniques in detail. | Very well structured course. Course | Content | was simple to understand and rich | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Excellent course content and presentation | Excellent course | Content | and presentation | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Great content! | Great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Great content delivered in a lucid way ! I am hooked to all courses in SPM specialization. | Great | Content | delivered in a lucid way ! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | A bit 'light' on content but ok for an introduction. | A bit 'light' on | Content | but ok for an introduction. | Positive | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| DzeIAhnpEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Awesome content ,very well drafted and explained course content. I am thankful to the coursera team, who has discovered such kind of really good course and specialization. | Awesome | Content | , very well drafted and explained | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| DzeIAhnpEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Awesome content ,very well drafted and explained course content. I am thankful to the coursera team, who has discovered such kind of really good course and specialization. | very well drafted and explained course | Content | I am thankful to the coursera | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | I like it and I did never imagined the abundance of its content based on today's market. Really the course helped me a lot and immediately started implementing what I learned. Thank you Coursera | never imagined the abundance of its | Content | based on today's market. Really the | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | The course content is amazing and very informative. I am not from hospitality sector but I understood all the concepts and because of all the quizzes and assignments, now I feel more confident in finding a job in hospitality sector. | The course | Content | is amazing and very informative. I | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | Very good and uptaded content on new hotel distribution ecosystem | Very good and uptaded | Content | on new hotel distribution ecosystem | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | I thoroughly enjoyed this entry-level course on the topic. Excellent material, very up-to-date and thoroughly prepared. The presentations are quite energetic, with gestures a bit over the top, but the content is worth watching every minute. | bit over the top, but the | Content | is worth watching every minute. | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | Great content, valuable insights. Thanks! | Great | Content | valuable insights. Thanks! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | Great content- videos and assignments were fantastic. Little partecipation and interaction with staff and other partecipants makes the course lose a lot of its attractiveness- most of the concepts are not rocket science and one would really benefit from confrontation with other students. | Great | Content | videos and assignments were fantastic. Little | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | The content of the course is basically on how hotels distribute their contents (their rooms to sale). The different channels are explained, such as the OTA, brand.com, meta search, and direct channels. The course also includes a very interesting point of view from OTA where Expedia and Booking.com explains their offers to hotels. I would love to have the views from hotel too, which are missing here. The suggested readings are quite a lot, basically from the online sites, many from the hotel and travel industry (skift, for example). Those readings are very useful in digging deeper on the subject. The assignments, are, on the other hand, quite weak. It consists of 4 peer review assignments. The first week contains a pretty quantitative analysis, but the other 3 assignments are basically conversational and just repeating what you have learnt in the class. The non-noted quizzes were pretty easy, you almost no need to think deeper to answer those questions. | The | Content | of the course is basically on | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | The content of the course is basically on how hotels distribute their contents (their rooms to sale). The different channels are explained, such as the OTA, brand.com, meta search, and direct channels. The course also includes a very interesting point of view from OTA where Expedia and Booking.com explains their offers to hotels. I would love to have the views from hotel too, which are missing here. The suggested readings are quite a lot, basically from the online sites, many from the hotel and travel industry (skift, for example). Those readings are very useful in digging deeper on the subject. The assignments, are, on the other hand, quite weak. It consists of 4 peer review assignments. The first week contains a pretty quantitative analysis, but the other 3 assignments are basically conversational and just repeating what you have learnt in the class. The non-noted quizzes were pretty easy, you almost no need to think deeper to answer those questions. | basically on how hotels distribute their | Content | (their rooms to sale). The different | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | In my humble opinion it is necessary to review some points in this module: 1) Video Content: Making more dynamic, switch between explanations and slides in full screen. Only explanations, it is very tiring to attend the classes. The video would be ideal as shown in week 4 of this Mooc: How the hotel shouldnt work with Expedia? or video: How to hotel shouldnt work with Booking.com? 2) Analysis requested: In the first week the requested analysis was of a very high level, it required knowledge of financial analysis and hotel area. In my case, I felt much difficulty because I do not have any knowledge in the hotel industry. And analyzing the exercise, I realized it was necessary to have knowledge of financial ratios of profitability and a certain familiarity in the hotel industry. I left a comment on the discussion board stating that I was not feeling safe to do the exercise. However, there was no demonstration by the teachers of the course. In short, I was not feeling prepared, let alone analyze colleagues. The first time, did not get the minimum score. The second time, with the longest time, I could better perform the exercise. But rather it was the result of review of financial ratios and other other accessories. I realized that those who examined me in the first and second time, had little or no idea about financial analysis. And another point that struck me was that one of the people who fell for me to analyze, was all in white and the person apologized for failing to do. With nothing to analyze, I did not think fair to give a low rating, so I preferred not to analyze. If the person left blank, something needs to be revised. When mounting a course, you have to take into consideration that there are different levels of students: beginner, intermediate and advanced in the subject matter. The first week was not to have been given is analysis. It could have been the third or fourth week of this Mooc, so it would have time for a further deepening of the matter addressed. 3) Amount of content: Adding the video, quiz and analysis, are about 30 content. It is very tiring and little time for such content. Could decrease the amount of video and quiz, relocating to another week course or Mooc. 4) Feedback: Teachers need to leave a contact way (facebook, twitter, etc.) and be active in Coursera forum or leave a wizard to ask questions when needed. 5) Notes: He missed the weight of the notes. I found a little confusing the allocation of notes. 6) Curriculum: Missed curriculum (biography) of teachers. No contact information. 7) Books: Missed suggestions of books in the hotel industry. Anyway, these are only observed points in order to contribute to development of course. Thanks for listening. | points in this module: 1) Video | Content | Making more dynamic, switch between explanations | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | In my humble opinion it is necessary to review some points in this module: 1) Video Content: Making more dynamic, switch between explanations and slides in full screen. Only explanations, it is very tiring to attend the classes. The video would be ideal as shown in week 4 of this Mooc: How the hotel shouldnt work with Expedia? or video: How to hotel shouldnt work with Booking.com? 2) Analysis requested: In the first week the requested analysis was of a very high level, it required knowledge of financial analysis and hotel area. In my case, I felt much difficulty because I do not have any knowledge in the hotel industry. And analyzing the exercise, I realized it was necessary to have knowledge of financial ratios of profitability and a certain familiarity in the hotel industry. I left a comment on the discussion board stating that I was not feeling safe to do the exercise. However, there was no demonstration by the teachers of the course. In short, I was not feeling prepared, let alone analyze colleagues. The first time, did not get the minimum score. The second time, with the longest time, I could better perform the exercise. But rather it was the result of review of financial ratios and other other accessories. I realized that those who examined me in the first and second time, had little or no idea about financial analysis. And another point that struck me was that one of the people who fell for me to analyze, was all in white and the person apologized for failing to do. With nothing to analyze, I did not think fair to give a low rating, so I preferred not to analyze. If the person left blank, something needs to be revised. When mounting a course, you have to take into consideration that there are different levels of students: beginner, intermediate and advanced in the subject matter. The first week was not to have been given is analysis. It could have been the third or fourth week of this Mooc, so it would have time for a further deepening of the matter addressed. 3) Amount of content: Adding the video, quiz and analysis, are about 30 content. It is very tiring and little time for such content. Could decrease the amount of video and quiz, relocating to another week course or Mooc. 4) Feedback: Teachers need to leave a contact way (facebook, twitter, etc.) and be active in Coursera forum or leave a wizard to ask questions when needed. 5) Notes: He missed the weight of the notes. I found a little confusing the allocation of notes. 6) Curriculum: Missed curriculum (biography) of teachers. No contact information. 7) Books: Missed suggestions of books in the hotel industry. Anyway, these are only observed points in order to contribute to development of course. Thanks for listening. | the matter addressed. 3) Amount of | Content | Adding the video, quiz and analysis, | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | In my humble opinion it is necessary to review some points in this module: 1) Video Content: Making more dynamic, switch between explanations and slides in full screen. Only explanations, it is very tiring to attend the classes. The video would be ideal as shown in week 4 of this Mooc: How the hotel shouldnt work with Expedia? or video: How to hotel shouldnt work with Booking.com? 2) Analysis requested: In the first week the requested analysis was of a very high level, it required knowledge of financial analysis and hotel area. In my case, I felt much difficulty because I do not have any knowledge in the hotel industry. And analyzing the exercise, I realized it was necessary to have knowledge of financial ratios of profitability and a certain familiarity in the hotel industry. I left a comment on the discussion board stating that I was not feeling safe to do the exercise. However, there was no demonstration by the teachers of the course. In short, I was not feeling prepared, let alone analyze colleagues. The first time, did not get the minimum score. The second time, with the longest time, I could better perform the exercise. But rather it was the result of review of financial ratios and other other accessories. I realized that those who examined me in the first and second time, had little or no idea about financial analysis. And another point that struck me was that one of the people who fell for me to analyze, was all in white and the person apologized for failing to do. With nothing to analyze, I did not think fair to give a low rating, so I preferred not to analyze. If the person left blank, something needs to be revised. When mounting a course, you have to take into consideration that there are different levels of students: beginner, intermediate and advanced in the subject matter. The first week was not to have been given is analysis. It could have been the third or fourth week of this Mooc, so it would have time for a further deepening of the matter addressed. 3) Amount of content: Adding the video, quiz and analysis, are about 30 content. It is very tiring and little time for such content. Could decrease the amount of video and quiz, relocating to another week course or Mooc. 4) Feedback: Teachers need to leave a contact way (facebook, twitter, etc.) and be active in Coursera forum or leave a wizard to ask questions when needed. 5) Notes: He missed the weight of the notes. I found a little confusing the allocation of notes. 6) Curriculum: Missed curriculum (biography) of teachers. No contact information. 7) Books: Missed suggestions of books in the hotel industry. Anyway, these are only observed points in order to contribute to development of course. Thanks for listening. | quiz and analysis, are about 30 | Content | It is very tiring and little | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | In my humble opinion it is necessary to review some points in this module: 1) Video Content: Making more dynamic, switch between explanations and slides in full screen. Only explanations, it is very tiring to attend the classes. The video would be ideal as shown in week 4 of this Mooc: How the hotel shouldnt work with Expedia? or video: How to hotel shouldnt work with Booking.com? 2) Analysis requested: In the first week the requested analysis was of a very high level, it required knowledge of financial analysis and hotel area. In my case, I felt much difficulty because I do not have any knowledge in the hotel industry. And analyzing the exercise, I realized it was necessary to have knowledge of financial ratios of profitability and a certain familiarity in the hotel industry. I left a comment on the discussion board stating that I was not feeling safe to do the exercise. However, there was no demonstration by the teachers of the course. In short, I was not feeling prepared, let alone analyze colleagues. The first time, did not get the minimum score. The second time, with the longest time, I could better perform the exercise. But rather it was the result of review of financial ratios and other other accessories. I realized that those who examined me in the first and second time, had little or no idea about financial analysis. And another point that struck me was that one of the people who fell for me to analyze, was all in white and the person apologized for failing to do. With nothing to analyze, I did not think fair to give a low rating, so I preferred not to analyze. If the person left blank, something needs to be revised. When mounting a course, you have to take into consideration that there are different levels of students: beginner, intermediate and advanced in the subject matter. The first week was not to have been given is analysis. It could have been the third or fourth week of this Mooc, so it would have time for a further deepening of the matter addressed. 3) Amount of content: Adding the video, quiz and analysis, are about 30 content. It is very tiring and little time for such content. Could decrease the amount of video and quiz, relocating to another week course or Mooc. 4) Feedback: Teachers need to leave a contact way (facebook, twitter, etc.) and be active in Coursera forum or leave a wizard to ask questions when needed. 5) Notes: He missed the weight of the notes. I found a little confusing the allocation of notes. 6) Curriculum: Missed curriculum (biography) of teachers. No contact information. 7) Books: Missed suggestions of books in the hotel industry. Anyway, these are only observed points in order to contribute to development of course. Thanks for listening. | tiring and little time for such | Content | Could decrease the amount of video | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| dZuQ4VicEeWbIxLOmbkGCQ | Great content for newbies. | Great | Content | for newbies. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| d_71NKdPEeSOWCIAC2iDyw | The professor is excellent, great didactic. Good material, readings and pictures to illustrate the course. I would only suggest to try to not repeat the content on the classes, but I understand he was repeating some topics in order to state some points. | to try to not repeat the | Content | on the classes, but I understand | Negative | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| e4SzF9c1EeS-LCIAC3icWw | This course has a lots of knownledge and well-structured contents. | a lots of knownledge and well-structured | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| e4SzF9c1EeS-LCIAC3icWw | the course structure and content are very good and interesting! | the course structure and | Content | are very good and interesting! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| e4SzF9c1EeS-LCIAC3icWw | Very bad course. The content can barely be applied outside US, you don't know from which perspective it's explained (for sales or purchasing people), the videos are bad quality, the teacher is babbling, no extra resources, no interaction with the audience outside the assessments. | Very bad course. The | Content | can barely be applied outside US, | Negative | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| e4SzF9c1EeS-LCIAC3icWw | Too short, too easy, too costly. Beautiful picture, beautiful title, but low content. | Beautiful picture, beautiful title, but low | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| EA0hyTUGEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Awesome content! | Awesome | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| EA0hyTUGEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course was a great tool towards a deeper understanding of more advanced aspects of the Meteor environment. I have learned a lot and enjoyed the way content is exposed in a natural and gradual way, building understanding one step after the other. Great course to those interested in a great and promising framework! | a lot and enjoyed the way | Content | is exposed in a natural and | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| EA0hyTUGEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Repetitive content, like the latter course, not challenging | Repetitive | Content | like the latter course, not challenging | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| eBEnnYkqEeWGBwqGAoUFww | I thoroughly enjoyed the course and greatly benefitted from its content. As a fresh MBA admit coming from scientific background, I was looking for a course that would cover the basics of Financial accounting, the so-called language of business. Marc Badia's Principles of Financial Accounting was the answer to it. After having had following the course, and of course passing it, I have gained a thorough understanding of the basic concepts of Accounting that I am now using in the Accounting class of IESE Business School. | course and greatly benefitted from its | Content | As a fresh MBA admit coming | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| eBEnnYkqEeWGBwqGAoUFww | Great content explained in a very concise and understandable way! | Great | Content | explained in a very concise and | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| eBEnnYkqEeWGBwqGAoUFww | Great course thanks to its content and to its progressive step-by-step increase in complexity. | Great course thanks to its | Content | and to its progressive step-by-step increase | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| eBEnnYkqEeWGBwqGAoUFww | Excellent course. Excellent content Excellent and lucid presentation. Now I got a feel that I understand standards of accounting, and I am a hard core engineer. Thanks a lot. | Excellent course. Excellent | Content | Excellent and lucid presentation. Now I | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| eBEnnYkqEeWGBwqGAoUFww | Quite confusing if you do not have a background already in accounting. The information in the course content does not match up with the quizzes. Great experience but a little lacking on the details needed to pass the quizzes each week....especially week | accounting. The information in the course | Content | does not match up with the | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Great content and presentation. Thank you! | Great | Content | and presentation. Thank you! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | A great course in a great specialization. Very high quality content. | a great specialization. Very high quality | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | One of the best coursers I have seen on Coursera so far. The video production quality, course structure and content is extra ordinary compared to other courses that I've seen so far. | video production quality, course structure and | Content | is extra ordinary compared to other | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very nice content and presented so nicely. Must read and highly recommended course for all managers and business analysts. | Very nice | Content | and presented so nicely. Must read | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Excellent course and excellent content. | Excellent course and excellent | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Great content, wonderful course | Great | Content | wonderful course | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I liked the content and the presentation of the course a lot. It is a good structured starting point from which I can go on learning the respective course topics. Further reading is delivered. This course offered me a structured repetition for a general understanding on the topic client needs and software requirements. | I liked the | Content | and the presentation of the course | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good overview. Wish there were more take away documents as well as links to additional information that summarized content in each section so you had a course book with terms at the end. | links to additional information that summarized | Content | in each section so you had | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| Eeb34jesEeWXuQopUhAqaw | The course design is really good. It is very hands-on. We get to build our own applications and test our applications in the quiz. However I really hope if there can be more content. The course is rather short. The quality is good but the quantity is a bit insufficient. I hope this course can be longer. Additional weeks can teach us how to convert BlueJ projects or Eclipse projects into EXE or host it in the cloud. I also hope this course, in the future, teaches us to make graphical user interface, which would be a nice conclusion to whatever program that we make I love the course. I really want to see more coming out of the Capstone project. I love the idea of the capstone building a recommender engine. However, to make it a complete package, I suggest a few things: ---Teach learners to use main() to create apps and convert to exe ---Teach learners, after the entire project codings, how to create an Applet out of the source codes ---Teach learners how to implement graphical user interface (make buttons, input field for movie queries) ---Teach learners how to, instead of getting data from a file in the folder, reads the data from a live-feed instead. That would enhance the learning experience of the course. Thank you for all those. I'm a hungry guy so I suggest lots of things. However I'm very happy with the course designs. Very engaging and fruitful course series. | hope if there can be more | Content | The course is rather short. The | Negative | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| eEsmqKAMEeSI0SIAC2iJgw | A fantastic content that helps you easily understand difficult concepts for the uninitiated in the field. A highly recommended experience. To improve only ask for more interviews with professionals who are now investigating the matter. Thank you very much for the effort. | A fantastic | Content | that helps you easily understand difficult | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| EfvjN5XvEeSqQiIACyEY7w | One of the best courses on Coursera that I've taken. Professor Ed purposefully addresses MOOC students and know who to motivate in front of the camera. Small talks of personal life (I think students get to know his wife's and daughter's names!) and the camera man (also all the crew showing up at the last lecture) make this MOOC EXTREMELY real! Besides the great pedagogical approach, each week there is a real case and a Skype interview with a business leader/ entrepreneur whose case is under exploration. This further adds authenticity to the course! Week one content's, for me is the best; while the other weeks are also great. Lots of metaphors (outrun the bear, gas pedal, worry plate...) as well. In short, the content is way beyond expectation. Highly recommend for those who run a private business! #fullofenergy #exemplaryMOOC #thankyou #Ed #coursera | authenticity to the course! Week one | Content | for me is the best; while | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| EfvjN5XvEeSqQiIACyEY7w | One of the best courses on Coursera that I've taken. Professor Ed purposefully addresses MOOC students and know who to motivate in front of the camera. Small talks of personal life (I think students get to know his wife's and daughter's names!) and the camera man (also all the crew showing up at the last lecture) make this MOOC EXTREMELY real! Besides the great pedagogical approach, each week there is a real case and a Skype interview with a business leader/ entrepreneur whose case is under exploration. This further adds authenticity to the course! Week one content's, for me is the best; while the other weeks are also great. Lots of metaphors (outrun the bear, gas pedal, worry plate...) as well. In short, the content is way beyond expectation. Highly recommend for those who run a private business! #fullofenergy #exemplaryMOOC #thankyou #Ed #coursera | ) as well. In short, the | Content | is way beyond expectation. Highly recommend | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| EfvjN5XvEeSqQiIACyEY7w | Unfortunately I can not deal with the professors voice. The content is good. | deal with the professors voice. The | Content | is good. | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| EfvjN5XvEeSqQiIACyEY7w | I really like the teacher and the course content. I feel very engaged in the video lectures and feel disappointed when one ends to quickly. Definitely an eye opener, with strategies that I can employ right away. Thank you. | like the teacher and the course | Content | I feel very engaged in the | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| EfvjN5XvEeSqQiIACyEY7w | Very good content. The pace is a very slow in my sense, but other than this good one. | Very good | Content | The pace is a very slow | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| EfvjN5XvEeSqQiIACyEY7w | This course is a must for anyone trying to strive in a business. Independently of the field and industry, the lessons learned through this course are applicable in the short run to your own journey. I took it as part of the goals we at my company set out to do after our first "Growth thrust" and the stories and learning from this course will definitively help us "Grow Smarter". I am not a native English speaker and the content was perfectly suited for me. Great work Darden School of Business! Otto Acuna San José, Costa Rica. | a native English speaker and the | Content | was perfectly suited for me. Great | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| EGWVwnE7EeWxvQr3acyajw | I thought this course would be kinda boring, but I have been pleasantly surprised at how interesting it is. Steve Parenti has a dry and sly sense of humor and the content gives me great historical and current perspective on the way healthcare works in the U.S. and to a lesser degree, in the rest of the world. Only quibble: There are lots of typos on the slides. Sometimes these are pretty amusing, but sometimes confusing. Also, some of the listed handouts seem to be relevant to the next course in the series, rather than to this one. All said, I think Dr. Parenti would be someone fun to go and have a beer with. | sly sense of humor and the | Content | gives me great historical and current | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| EGWVwnE7EeWxvQr3acyajw | The professor just read the materials through all the modules, and the course was really boring. But, the content was quite updated that was the only good thing. Does not worth such a high payment. | course was really boring. But, the | Content | was quite updated that was the | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| eH8S1b38EeWxzxJER_JW2w | This is an interesting course, though it is taught from the perspective of design with less focus on content or how to actually write an infographic. Still, very useful. | of design with less focus on | Content | or how to actually write an | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| eH8S1b38EeWxzxJER_JW2w | Very good. Good Content | Very good. Good | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| eH8S1b38EeWxzxJER_JW2w | I enjoyed this course but I was not satisfied with the assessment. The content kept me engaged and highly motivated. I acquired some very specific and useful skills, which I developed by completing projects on topics of my choosing that were meaningful to me. I really liked Karl's casual and somewhat spontaneous style - this is a breath of fresh air from the video tutorials out there where lecturers are reading from prompts or reciting from memory. The biggest drawback to this course is that it relied completely on peer grading for the assessment (which you have to pay for). I don't think this assessment method was sufficiently designed to reduce the influence of graders who were overly subjective, hadn't sufficiently mastered the content themselves, or were disinterested in putting effort into the peer review. From now on, I will think twice about paying for any course where all of the assessment is based on how my classmates grade me. While peer review can be useful for learning, I don't think it's an accurate assessment tool. Especially if I'm paying to learn from a professional in a field, I'd expect to receive some feedback and assessment from that pro. Another area of improvement is that there were several instances where videos repeated things covered in previous videos. These things could be cleaned up a bit and the course would be more polished. | not satisfied with the assessment. The | Content | kept me engaged and highly motivated. | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| eH8S1b38EeWxzxJER_JW2w | I enjoyed this course but I was not satisfied with the assessment. The content kept me engaged and highly motivated. I acquired some very specific and useful skills, which I developed by completing projects on topics of my choosing that were meaningful to me. I really liked Karl's casual and somewhat spontaneous style - this is a breath of fresh air from the video tutorials out there where lecturers are reading from prompts or reciting from memory. The biggest drawback to this course is that it relied completely on peer grading for the assessment (which you have to pay for). I don't think this assessment method was sufficiently designed to reduce the influence of graders who were overly subjective, hadn't sufficiently mastered the content themselves, or were disinterested in putting effort into the peer review. From now on, I will think twice about paying for any course where all of the assessment is based on how my classmates grade me. While peer review can be useful for learning, I don't think it's an accurate assessment tool. Especially if I'm paying to learn from a professional in a field, I'd expect to receive some feedback and assessment from that pro. Another area of improvement is that there were several instances where videos repeated things covered in previous videos. These things could be cleaned up a bit and the course would be more polished. | overly subjective, hadn't sufficiently mastered the | Content | themselves, or were disinterested in putting | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| eH8S1b38EeWxzxJER_JW2w | Great content! Just have fun and learn new things about info graphics | Great | Content | Just have fun and learn new | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| EKfyaEtaEeW4rRLEP0z9Bw | Five stars: wonderful content, I was engaged. No matter what ,I give a perfect score. However, I wish the instructors were less "I'm reading a script" and sounded more natural. I also missed video summary for some modules and module quiz to refresh knowledge. Thank you Ellen, Claire and ASU for making affordable this course and specialization. My gratitude with all of you! | Five stars: wonderful | Content | I was engaged. No matter what | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Very good overview course. This helps you understand the terms used in Big Data, Cloud Computing and Content Delivery Networks. You will understand most of the terms fairly well by the end of this course. I'm impressed by the instructor, his English is very good. His command of the subject is great. He manages to structure this course in a way that makes it more understandable than it would otherwise be. | in Big Data, Cloud Computing and | Content | Delivery Networks. You will understand most | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | the content is simple, I think the course is just for watching during the break. | the | Content | is simple, I think the course | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Had fun with this course. Precise, concise & the content is cutting edge & juicy! | this course. Precise, concise & the | Content | is cutting edge & juicy! | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | The way the content is delivered is not interesting. And the lecturer basically is reading from the power point | The way the | Content | is delivered is not interesting. And | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Course is very basic , although contents are compact and informative. | Course is very basic , although | Content | are compact and informative. | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Very good content and presentations, Thanks, | Very good | Content | and presentations, Thanks, | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Thank youu very much for the very comprehensive and informative content of this course. | for the very comprehensive and informative | Content | of this course. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Map Reduce needs more crisp explanation. Too much content explained in short slides. Scope for improvement | needs more crisp explanation. Too much | Content | explained in short slides. Scope for | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | For a beginer, this is a very good starting point.. I am loving the contents and enjoying my learning.. | point. . I am loving the | Content | and enjoying my learning. . | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | The contents of PPTs are just read out in the video lectures. It's as good as providing only the PPTs. | The | Content | of PPTs are just read out | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| emCu12atEeW2DA58V0Z6GQ | The assignments are not really commensurate to the content, i.e. they are much simpler and superficial and do not really test the content, which is deeper and implies practical activities difficult to measure. The title is also partially misleading, at least for me, and I would rather call it a blues introduction to jazz improvisation. But the content and the exercises proposed are great, one of the best and no nonsense approach to bebop improvisation I've ever found | are not really commensurate to the | Content | i. e. they are much simpler | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| emCu12atEeW2DA58V0Z6GQ | The assignments are not really commensurate to the content, i.e. they are much simpler and superficial and do not really test the content, which is deeper and implies practical activities difficult to measure. The title is also partially misleading, at least for me, and I would rather call it a blues introduction to jazz improvisation. But the content and the exercises proposed are great, one of the best and no nonsense approach to bebop improvisation I've ever found | and do not really test the | Content | which is deeper and implies practical | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| emCu12atEeW2DA58V0Z6GQ | The assignments are not really commensurate to the content, i.e. they are much simpler and superficial and do not really test the content, which is deeper and implies practical activities difficult to measure. The title is also partially misleading, at least for me, and I would rather call it a blues introduction to jazz improvisation. But the content and the exercises proposed are great, one of the best and no nonsense approach to bebop improvisation I've ever found | introduction to jazz improvisation. But the | Content | and the exercises proposed are great, | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| emCu12atEeW2DA58V0Z6GQ | Excellent content and faculty ! thoroughly enjoying it : ) Thanks a lot to all who have worked towadrds making this material available | Excellent | Content | and faculty ! thoroughly enjoying it | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| ENhHCTboEeW8ZAoCexam_w | It's one of the best course for understanding all the statistical tools , used for data sciences. Thanks to entire team for making such a wonderful course content | for making such a wonderful course | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| eo6NBCQPEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | I haven't quite completed this course yet (the end is in sight!) but I want to report how challenging and worthwhile it has been. I have had a lot of my questions answered and I am inspired to read and review the content again as I am sure I will understand a lot more. Thank you. | inspired to read and review the | Content | again as I am sure I | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| eo6NBCQPEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | This is an excellent course for teachers who want to better understand and support children with reading difficulties. The content of the course encompasses all of the main aspects of concern and the references to the research provides a springboard to further study in this area. Many thanks to Jenny and Vincent for making this course informative and interesting. | support children with reading difficulties. The | Content | of the course encompasses all of | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Course content: some Swift specific topics are shortly covered in the videos. Overall, the teaching material is very short. In the first week, students basically learn how to start Xcode. Week four contains a 15 minutes video on image processing, that's basically it for the week. Follow-up readings for week two just provide a link to Apple's iOS Developer site. That's clearly not enough for a course. Students can google for tutorials by themselves. Project: The projects mentions classes, which are not covered in the course. It was then also my impression from the peer reviews, that some students without prior knowledge were just lost. There are many great tutorials on the web which offer more insights and give students a much more fundamental knowledge than this course. | Course | Content | some Swift specific topics are shortly | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | this was thefirst course i payed for and unfortunately the worst expierience. lack of content beyond the stuff in the available simple swift tutorials and from an eduucational pint of view afwully if at all prepared its as shame that i cannot give this "course" ZERO stars which it deserves! i should have checked the very negative feedback of the former participants before bying it i will be much MUCH more alert regarding content on coursera from now on | unfortunately the worst expierience. lack of | Content | beyond the stuff in the available | Negative | 0.9 | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | this was thefirst course i payed for and unfortunately the worst expierience. lack of content beyond the stuff in the available simple swift tutorials and from an eduucational pint of view afwully if at all prepared its as shame that i cannot give this "course" ZERO stars which it deserves! i should have checked the very negative feedback of the former participants before bying it i will be much MUCH more alert regarding content on coursera from now on | be much MUCH more alert regarding | Content | on coursera from now on | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The teaching content is not at the same level of what required to complete the final project, which frustrated the beginners and also stop me from finishing the whole course. What a pity! | The teaching | Content | is not at the same level | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | There are only a few hours of content across the five weeks. The whole course can be done in a single evening. However, if you try this starting from no programming experience it will likely be extremely hard to complete. Since the course has as a prerequisite that you can already code this shouldn't be an issue for anyone. | are only a few hours of | Content | across the five weeks. The whole | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Bad content and instructor. no logistic in place. if you are planning to pay to get certificate. I would suggest look else where. my $279 are stuck in here and they don't reply to forum posts. | Bad | Content | and instructor. no logistic in place. | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | It is very god so far I am on the second week and I am very happy and pleased with the content also lecturers are very educated and calm. STRONGLY RECOMMENDED | very happy and pleased with the | Content | also lecturers are very educated and | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The content is absolutely amazing. What I didn't really like was that the last assignment was a curve ball to me and most of the other students in my class. There was very little preparation to it and thus took a while to understand how to get started on it. | The | Content | is absolutely amazing. What I didn't | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Should be lecture by Professor instead of BS student. The content was not well organized. Also should prepare slides and explain the Swift for more details. More exercises needed in each weeks lecture. Hopefully, this course should improve next time. | Professor instead of BS student. The | Content | was not well organized. Also should | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The Good: The idea of having the lectures in a Q&A style, two experts in continuous conversation about the topic has a potential The Bad: That potential is wasted on poorly planned lessons and course content The Ugly: Instructors run the Swift code that is written during the lesson and they get a wrong result due to an error in the code. They both agree that the result is weird but then continue to explain that this is how Swift works. In short, they are misleading and confusing you on a topic you are trying to learn. This is of course unintentional but gives you a clue about how the quality check on lecture videos are taken care of. Details here: https://www.coursera.org/learn/swift-programming/discussions/DBk-SJO2EeWNbBIwwhtGwQ | on poorly planned lessons and course | Content | The Ugly: Instructors run the Swift | Negative | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Course was the worst I have taken on Coursera. I wish I could have received a refund. The professors were hard to follow, laughed through mistakes and did not do a good job of walking through the course content. I would not recommend this course to anyone. | job of walking through the course | Content | I would not recommend this course | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I am sure if you are familiar with the content or an expert programmer looking for an overview of a new language then this would be perfect but you do need to understand swift before starting this introduction to swift. The lessons felt very unstructured, unplanned and ad hoc almost like the people presenting didn't know they were being recorded, this meant that the examples given were contrived without consideration to the suitability to present the concept succinctly and would require anyone but an existing swift programmer needing to carry out additional reading which rather defeats the purpose of an "introduction to..." course. A little scripting and lesson planning and preparation of content would have made the difference between this excellently produced and edited course being awkward and an effort to attend into a really useful reference for beginers of swift programming. To summarise, the obviously expert technical knowledge of the speakers and the quality of the editing are let down by rushed lesson content. | if you are familiar with the | Content | or an expert programmer looking for | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I am sure if you are familiar with the content or an expert programmer looking for an overview of a new language then this would be perfect but you do need to understand swift before starting this introduction to swift. The lessons felt very unstructured, unplanned and ad hoc almost like the people presenting didn't know they were being recorded, this meant that the examples given were contrived without consideration to the suitability to present the concept succinctly and would require anyone but an existing swift programmer needing to carry out additional reading which rather defeats the purpose of an "introduction to..." course. A little scripting and lesson planning and preparation of content would have made the difference between this excellently produced and edited course being awkward and an effort to attend into a really useful reference for beginers of swift programming. To summarise, the obviously expert technical knowledge of the speakers and the quality of the editing are let down by rushed lesson content. | and lesson planning and preparation of | Content | would have made the difference between | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I am sure if you are familiar with the content or an expert programmer looking for an overview of a new language then this would be perfect but you do need to understand swift before starting this introduction to swift. The lessons felt very unstructured, unplanned and ad hoc almost like the people presenting didn't know they were being recorded, this meant that the examples given were contrived without consideration to the suitability to present the concept succinctly and would require anyone but an existing swift programmer needing to carry out additional reading which rather defeats the purpose of an "introduction to..." course. A little scripting and lesson planning and preparation of content would have made the difference between this excellently produced and edited course being awkward and an effort to attend into a really useful reference for beginers of swift programming. To summarise, the obviously expert technical knowledge of the speakers and the quality of the editing are let down by rushed lesson content. | are let down by rushed lesson | Content | | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | This course was little more than a haphazard, ambling preview of a tiny bit of Swift. There was some useful content in the class but the organization was poor and there was almost no evidence of course design or use of the teaching techniques I expected to see from a major university. The best section of the course was week 5, where they syntax of Objective-C and Swift were superficially compared. That section did give some clear opinions on why Swift should be chosen over Objective-C for new development. The other sections just contained too many confusing, unrehearsed diversions into esoteric topics to be of much use. I ended getting more out of the Apple documentation on Swift than I did from this class. However, the instructors have received ample feedback of this nature and they do seem genuinely concerned with improving the course. Assuming that they will make major improvements for the next round and noting that Coursera's infrastructure is excellent, don't be scared to take the class. The email reminders from Coursera about assignments, etc... kept me on track and kept me in the class. | of Swift. There was some useful | Content | in the class but the organization | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I wish I had paid closer attention to the refund policy. The production quality and content did not meet my expectations. | refund policy. The production quality and | Content | did not meet my expectations. | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The lectures for this course seem unorganized and often had poor audio. The content covered in many lectures seemed off topic. Quiz questions would then focus on the off topic information making it confusing with regard to what material to focus on during a lecture. Do I focus on the proposed subject of the video or the many tangents about other topics. This combined with the unorganized nature of videos(just winging it) made the lectures distracting. The lecture videos are full of code that simply does not work in the real world and help from staff takes literally days to get(and not just over the weekend). | and often had poor audio. The | Content | covered in many lectures seemed off | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | This course is poorly designed. What course on a programming language jumps first into how to use the debugger and what went wrong with a program? You are not introducing Swift, you are introducing xcode (and doing a terrible job of it). Also, I have been using xcode and Swift for 8 months now and producing some really good work, but I could only get 3/7 on your quiz because you have written questions with the purpose of tricking people instead of reinforcing or checking knowledge of the content. When you teach a new application, consider introducing the interface first. Explain what the various areas are, what they are needed for, and how to control them. This orients the user in the application and helps them to find their way around when they are trying to reinforce your teachings later. The presentation for this course is so unprofessional. It's like a running commentary on a movie instead of an educational presentation. I felt like I was listening to two geeks stuffing around and having a good time, instead of people who are professional teachers! I'm so incredibly disappointed with this course. Back to the wonderful work of Paul Hegarty from Stanford University on iTunes University and YouTube for me. University of Toronto - you should really consider what your teaching staff are doing before you unleash them on the world. | reinforcing or checking knowledge of the | Content | When you teach a new application, | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The professors did no prepared the classes. They make so many mistakes in the video lectures and they also laughts in the middle of the course and they send a non-professional feeling to the students. The content of the course is very good, but the proffesors could really do better. | non-professional feeling to the students. The | Content | of the course is very good, | Positive | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| euRJEycxEeWP8AqYi9cmiw | Great introduction to Astronomy! I learnt a lot about the current state and the unsolved challenges in this field. I liked that I could play with various simulators and develop detailed understanding. As a beginner in Astronomy, I had a little difficulty finishing the first and last week's quizzes. Apart from that, I was able to easily follow the content in the course. | was able to easily follow the | Content | in the course. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| eV-OTCTuEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | I have adored this course, the content and Mr. Wright's approach. His enthusiasm and knowledge of Classical Music shine throughout the course. He has made classical music far more approachable for those less in tune. Thank you for the wonderful course Mr. Wright! | I have adored this course, the | Content | and Mr. Wright's approach. His enthusiasm | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| eV-OTCTuEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | During this course, as a complete novice, I am shocked daily by how much there is to learn about music. The course does an excellent job of inspiring one to learn more and providing the quality of content to enable one to do so. | more and providing the quality of | Content | to enable one to do so. | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| eV-OTCTuEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Thank you Pr. Wright for this excellent course, I really enjoyed the content, the structure as well as your way of explaining things! As simple music lover, I have been listening to classical music since a while, this course helped me to have a more structured knowledge of it. Hope you would think of recording more and deeper courses. | excellent course, I really enjoyed the | Content | the structure as well as your | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| eV-OTCTuEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Great course! I learned a lot, discovered new music and the way mr. Wright presents the content is very good. | the way mr. Wright presents the | Content | is very good. | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| eVrrS8E_EeWP5g5dlaZx4w | Very interesting MOOC. The instructor is very knowledgeable in the area and uses interesting examples to explain the content. | uses interesting examples to explain the | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| eWC74yvREeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | Introduction course to other courses, not much to learn here. And also some quizzes question were never addressed on the content. | question were never addressed on the | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | Totally enjoyable. The videos are professional, varied and so informative. Comparing the quiz to some others , I found they were better formulated and less ambiguous. Personally I feel I learned an amazing amount in a short time span and bother the content and pace were stimulating! so bravo! This is the type of general knowledge everyone should have but probably 90 % only have a rough, inaccurate or no awareness whatsoever. This could be run even at the school level, it could stimulate future scientists. | short time span and bother the | Content | and pace were stimulating! so bravo! | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | Great introduction to the big history concept. Awesome production. Content of the last two weeks is significantly weaker than the rest though | the big history concept. Awesome production. | Content | of the last two weeks is | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | The high quality of videos and content makes this course an outstanding, fantastic and entertainment MOOC course for everyone who wish to learn the big history that is hidding in the Universe. Thanks coursera and macquare University for let us access to this beatiful show of altruism and openness, both of you deserve not only a big five star but a great standing applasue. Congratulations great course. All my best Coursera community, Carlos Arturo Pimentel. | The high quality of videos and | Content | makes this course an outstanding, fantastic | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | Excellent course in integrating all the 'ologies' that give insight into how it all came together from the Big Bang to the development of life to a vision of the future landscape of human existence. Excellent presenters, the right level of subject matter content and an exceptional level of production quality. A great job done by the entire staff and much appreciated. | the right level of subject matter | Content | and an exceptional level of production | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | This is definitely my favorite course on Coursera and anywhere else in internet! So glad I accidentally ran into it! Under a name that doesn't tell much about the content there is a real jewel - a multidisciplinary course that is truly able to connect many of the dots and make perfect sense of all these endless math and science, history and many other classes we all had to sit throughout our school years. I loved every minute of this course, all the experts zooming into subjects, all of additional materials (especially Crushcourse videos). Big History course is awesome for those always asking "but why?" questions. A very big thank you to The Big History course team for finding time and passion for making it available to everyone in the world! | that doesn't tell much about the | Content | there is a real jewel - | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | Enjoyable course and I appreciated the interdisciplinary nature. At times, I felt like I wanted to delve deeper into the content, but I understand that this MOOC, like most others, are breadth courses designed for incoming Freshmen. | wanted to delve deeper into the | Content | but I understand that this MOOC, | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | The course content had met its objectives. I loved the way interdisciplinary sciences were explained precisely from Astronomy to paleontology to economics | The course | Content | had met its objectives. I loved | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | Fantastic course - great content, very informative, and engaging presentations | Fantastic course - great | Content | very informative, and engaging presentations | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | The course is very nicely done and well organized. The fundamental organization around sources of learning and the progression of lessons are well done and strongly support knowledge building. Some of the speakers have verbal patterns or flows of speaking that can be a bit distracting, but they are all interesting and informative. I like that you can also download transcripts. I am a very visual learner whose mind tends to wander off when faced with a talking head. Having the transcript to follow as I listen allowed me to highlight and make notes while listening, ensuring greater attention to the content. Ultimately, I made the decision to not finish the course. Not because the course was not well done but because it doesn't align with my own interests in systems thinking and complexity. It is a good course and well worth engaging in, even if you discover, as I did, that it doesn't quite match one's learning needs. I do recommend it if you are interested in cosmology and theories related to the origins of the universe. | listening, ensuring greater attention to the | Content | Ultimately, I made the decision to | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | This course covers a lot of complex material in a concise and approachable manner. It is possible to understand the content (and most importantly learn about the subject) without having a scientific background. | It is possible to understand the | Content | (and most importantly learn about the | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | Incredible course in every way: Highly competent lecturers, excellent video quality in both content and production, great pacing and delivery of information and dozens of links to engaging resource material. One of the best MOOCs I have ever participated in: fun, informative and intriguing! | lecturers, excellent video quality in both | Content | and production, great pacing and delivery | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| eXbmvDe9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Poor alignment between assignments and lectures. Lots of content poorly explained. | between assignments and lectures. Lots of | Content | poorly explained. | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| eXbmvDe9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | It's a very course content, but level of difficulty is hard for an online training. | It's a very course | Content | but level of difficulty is hard | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| eXbmvDe9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Good contents but a bit over-complicated assignments. | Good | Content | but a bit over-complicated assignments. | Positive | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| eXbmvDe9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Hi there, this course was great but i will recommend to split the large lectures in 2 and add more dynamic content and make the examples in rails project instead of the console will be great this course has been in the end a bit boring because i the professor need to be more fluid and make it more funny! for say it in some way for everything else it was a great course thanks you! | in 2 and add more dynamic | Content | and make the examples in rails | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| eXbmvDe9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | All the information and content given is great and necessary to work with mongo db. unfortunately, the timing and pacing is really tough because it relies on pretty long assignments. Take this course if you can handle going through 20 pages of instructions for a homework or 2, or you need a fast paced review of mongo and mongoid coupled with rails. | All the information and | Content | given is great and necessary to | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| eXbmvDe9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | course work is too hectic. its hard for some one who is new to web app development and new to ruby! but over all strength and content of the course is good. | ruby! but over all strength and | Content | of the course is good. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| EZVzungdEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Excellent course that both informs and inspires. There is a good deal of content as well as advice. The student writer is encouraged to explore and be unafraid. The only draw back is that the online classroom does not allow the auditing students to post and get feedback on their assignments and it must be done externally to fully get the benefit of our fellow students. | There is a good deal of | Content | as well as advice. The student | Positive | 0.9 | 4.0 |
| F0J_-3LWEeWxvQr3acyajw | It's a great course, but some of the questions could be improved. Many of the questions were too lacking in content. | the questions were too lacking in | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| f8wh4qQ-EeWF3A6Yvo0Lpw | The course content is excellent, but the peer review quality can be improved. Course Mentors are kind and helpful, however, the system is not functioning well sometimes. | The course | Content | is excellent, but the peer review | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| FbK0-CSNEeWDEQ4YpP0FCQ | I'm already in week 4 and the course has been great. the lecture videos are easy to follow and there's so much content available. | to follow and there's so much | Content | available. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Very thought provoking course. The online content was well presented, and the supporting reading was highly quality, relevant material that expanded my knowledge on this subject and I am sure it will be really helpful in improving my future research projects and planning. Highly recommended. | Very thought provoking course. The online | Content | was well presented, and the supporting | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Content is good. I found the information in the videos valuable, albeit short and leaving me wanting more. I suppose that's what research is for. In general great and short course to get one on track with research methods.Take this course, as it is good. So why three stars? I know it is a long review, and feel free to remove it from the list, if you deem it appropriate. I have learned a lot in the course, and it is a valuable experience still. My problem lies with the design of the course, that seems to have started with great vigour at then lost the steam at the end. I would like to suggest few pointers. Especially since the presenters have another courses in the catalogue with similar issues. 1. Help learners to focus - Body language, and position in the room. Standing in front of windows with the traffic outside may seem a minor thing, but it detracts form you and the content. As a course designer it is a responsibility to set it right. Same applies for hands in back pockets, posture when sat down, lens flare etc. 2 - As instructors you have offered very little teaching. All was left to the guest speakers. All very good and knowledgeable. Some graphic and own mini lecture would help to establish you as experts (not that you are not, but we would not know that from the videos), rather than mere interviewers. (Summary of what was said). 3 - match the video and e-tivity focus. And think about the accessibility of the material to your learners, especially if no previous knowledge is required. Week three was about managing research and planning. The reading, was surprisingly different (week 4 activity would be more suitable here) and really hard to access to someone, who hasn't done much reading in theories of knowledge etc. This would be more accessible as a guided lecture and quiz, rather than 400 words response. I hope I was not offensive to anyone. I was trying to help you to help us learn better, if that makes sense. M | | Content | is good. I found the information | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Content is good. I found the information in the videos valuable, albeit short and leaving me wanting more. I suppose that's what research is for. In general great and short course to get one on track with research methods.Take this course, as it is good. So why three stars? I know it is a long review, and feel free to remove it from the list, if you deem it appropriate. I have learned a lot in the course, and it is a valuable experience still. My problem lies with the design of the course, that seems to have started with great vigour at then lost the steam at the end. I would like to suggest few pointers. Especially since the presenters have another courses in the catalogue with similar issues. 1. Help learners to focus - Body language, and position in the room. Standing in front of windows with the traffic outside may seem a minor thing, but it detracts form you and the content. As a course designer it is a responsibility to set it right. Same applies for hands in back pockets, posture when sat down, lens flare etc. 2 - As instructors you have offered very little teaching. All was left to the guest speakers. All very good and knowledgeable. Some graphic and own mini lecture would help to establish you as experts (not that you are not, but we would not know that from the videos), rather than mere interviewers. (Summary of what was said). 3 - match the video and e-tivity focus. And think about the accessibility of the material to your learners, especially if no previous knowledge is required. Week three was about managing research and planning. The reading, was surprisingly different (week 4 activity would be more suitable here) and really hard to access to someone, who hasn't done much reading in theories of knowledge etc. This would be more accessible as a guided lecture and quiz, rather than 400 words response. I hope I was not offensive to anyone. I was trying to help you to help us learn better, if that makes sense. M | it detracts form you and the | Content | As a course designer it is | Positive | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | It is like for kids, I think all courses must mention their target audience. Contents, Videos, talks nothing was value for time. | courses must mention their target audience. | Content | Videos, talks nothing was value for | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | In terms of delivery, the course delivery was very simple, critical and relevant. The course content was very engaging as it included interviews with graduate students and professors alike who are doing their researches. Quite fittingly, I commend the creators of this course for recognizing the fact that most online courses on research methods out there focus on having a linear tackling of lesson topics. For this course, it stressed the key issues and reflections of individuals who are doing the actual rudiments of the thing we call "research". More importantly, this course was also critical and relevant in many respects as it allowed us to have some write-ups about the topics without requiring us to go through many readings. It is in this sense that I would say that it its relevant--concise and direct in its approach, the instructors have seen to it that what they are to discuss will be the things which new comers to the research endeavor might ask. Kudos to the team! And my warmest regards to all of you! =D | simple, critical and relevant. The course | Content | was very engaging as it included | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | The overall premise of the course is strong. Although I found the instructors and guest speakers extremely knowledgeable, quite a bit of the material was repetitive within in each week's video clip content. | within in each week's video clip | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | There was very little actual content in this course, and I can't say I learned very much. In hindsight, I wish I hadn't paid for a verified certificate. | There was very little actual | Content | in this course, and I can't | Negative | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | course content was great, but I felt like the course left me hanging.... | course | Content | was great, but I felt like | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | High quality content. Congratulations to the team! | High quality | Content | Congratulations to the team! | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Great introduction to research methods for anyone contemplating a research masters of Phd. I haven't studied for a while, so found the course content particularly useful. Course is taught through a combination of videos, readings and weekly assignments which are peer reviewed. Weeks 2 and 3 of the course are particularly useful. | a while, so found the course | Content | particularly useful. Course is taught through | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Really enjoyed this course - very appealing mix of different ways of presenting content and engaging users. | mix of different ways of presenting | Content | and engaging users. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Empty of content | Empty of | Content | | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | I didn't knew anything about marketing when I started the course. I liked the lecture's content and all the activities. This is my first online course that I've finished | the course. I liked the lecture's | Content | and all the activities. This is | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | I found this course to be very basic. I appreciate that Marketing requires a broad interaction, but a course designed to take 4 weeks (with 2~3 weeks of actual content) is too much. I need to learn about cost-per-click, impressions, ROI on ad spend - that sort of thing. I don't see how 3D printing is relevant to the majority of people in marketing today. | weeks (with 2~3 weeks of actual | Content | is too much. I need to | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | The concepts are excellent, but I was a little taken back that the content examples, required reading and/or case studies were dated. Perhaps the best research and case studies are 4-5 years old. I thoroughly enjoyed reading them and learning from them. I guess the reason I didn't give the course 5 stars is because I expect at least one reading or case study pre module (ideally) to be published within the last 12 months. Overall it was really fun and informative and I will be taking more classes. All the best...Stephanie Schreurs | a little taken back that the | Content | examples, required reading and/or case studies | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Really also and relevant content | Really also and relevant | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Excellent option for those with no preview experience on marketing. Really enjoyed the content and found it very useful for my professional life | experience on marketing. Really enjoyed the | Content | and found it very useful for | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Good content but would have preferred if it was more interactive. There is no way to discuss in detail and debate over a topic. I still have many questions unanswered and forum is very inactive. Wish there was a thread for each topic where people could just discuss their perspective. Overall good content but lack of interaction makes it incomplete in my opinion. | Good | Content | but would have preferred if it | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Good content but would have preferred if it was more interactive. There is no way to discuss in detail and debate over a topic. I still have many questions unanswered and forum is very inactive. Wish there was a thread for each topic where people could just discuss their perspective. Overall good content but lack of interaction makes it incomplete in my opinion. | just discuss their perspective. Overall good | Content | but lack of interaction makes it | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Well Detailed and helpful content | Well Detailed and helpful | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Excellent format of online education. Participative and top graded content | online education. Participative and top graded | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | The course offered an interesting overview and introduction to digital marketing; it is also a good start to the specialization in Digital Marketing. This was the first time I have taken a Coursera course and was able to complete it, and I've tried several. Quite often, the content is just too difficult to wade through without 1:1 human support. I think the workload was pitched correctly. I also liked how some theory was taught, and some research based on the theory. It is not just a bunch of case studies. There is an effort to describe the general principles that can apply across both firms and specific technologies, although there is a lot of both (firms and technologies) addressed as well. The most useful part of the course was a rather extensive discussion around pay what you want (PWYW), and the theory behind that, and the supporting case-based and research-based evidence, is really compelling. I plan to use a PWYW strategy as I develop my online startup. Thanks, Coursera and University of Illinois! On the negative side (and there's not much of that), some of the interviews of students on the U of I quad were ridiculously pointless. They really offered nothing of great value and took up substantial time. They were too anecdotal and at times the resulting content worked against the principles being taught in the course. I would rather see user-generated content, created by students and grads of the course, perhaps, from around the world, each discussing some aspect of that unit's topic. Just focusing on student interviews at U of I seems pretty parochial. I would also love to participate in UGC for a newsletter spinning off from this course. They use the courage presumably to extend the U of I community, but here's the thing: it creates its own community, and U of I would be well-served to re-oriented around it, rather than assuming that the only path forward is the reverse. Again, this is one of the most successful courses at Coursera. So maybe this is the direction for U of I to be heading...For example, I would anticipate offers from U or I for how they can get me into additional non-traditional business (or other) Coursera courses, or U of I courses or programs, or heck, teaching for U o I. Anyway, embrace the disruption! | I've tried several. Quite often, the | Content | is just too difficult to wade | Negative | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | The course offered an interesting overview and introduction to digital marketing; it is also a good start to the specialization in Digital Marketing. This was the first time I have taken a Coursera course and was able to complete it, and I've tried several. Quite often, the content is just too difficult to wade through without 1:1 human support. I think the workload was pitched correctly. I also liked how some theory was taught, and some research based on the theory. It is not just a bunch of case studies. There is an effort to describe the general principles that can apply across both firms and specific technologies, although there is a lot of both (firms and technologies) addressed as well. The most useful part of the course was a rather extensive discussion around pay what you want (PWYW), and the theory behind that, and the supporting case-based and research-based evidence, is really compelling. I plan to use a PWYW strategy as I develop my online startup. Thanks, Coursera and University of Illinois! On the negative side (and there's not much of that), some of the interviews of students on the U of I quad were ridiculously pointless. They really offered nothing of great value and took up substantial time. They were too anecdotal and at times the resulting content worked against the principles being taught in the course. I would rather see user-generated content, created by students and grads of the course, perhaps, from around the world, each discussing some aspect of that unit's topic. Just focusing on student interviews at U of I seems pretty parochial. I would also love to participate in UGC for a newsletter spinning off from this course. They use the courage presumably to extend the U of I community, but here's the thing: it creates its own community, and U of I would be well-served to re-oriented around it, rather than assuming that the only path forward is the reverse. Again, this is one of the most successful courses at Coursera. So maybe this is the direction for U of I to be heading...For example, I would anticipate offers from U or I for how they can get me into additional non-traditional business (or other) Coursera courses, or U of I courses or programs, or heck, teaching for U o I. Anyway, embrace the disruption! | anecdotal and at times the resulting | Content | worked against the principles being taught | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | The course offered an interesting overview and introduction to digital marketing; it is also a good start to the specialization in Digital Marketing. This was the first time I have taken a Coursera course and was able to complete it, and I've tried several. Quite often, the content is just too difficult to wade through without 1:1 human support. I think the workload was pitched correctly. I also liked how some theory was taught, and some research based on the theory. It is not just a bunch of case studies. There is an effort to describe the general principles that can apply across both firms and specific technologies, although there is a lot of both (firms and technologies) addressed as well. The most useful part of the course was a rather extensive discussion around pay what you want (PWYW), and the theory behind that, and the supporting case-based and research-based evidence, is really compelling. I plan to use a PWYW strategy as I develop my online startup. Thanks, Coursera and University of Illinois! On the negative side (and there's not much of that), some of the interviews of students on the U of I quad were ridiculously pointless. They really offered nothing of great value and took up substantial time. They were too anecdotal and at times the resulting content worked against the principles being taught in the course. I would rather see user-generated content, created by students and grads of the course, perhaps, from around the world, each discussing some aspect of that unit's topic. Just focusing on student interviews at U of I seems pretty parochial. I would also love to participate in UGC for a newsletter spinning off from this course. They use the courage presumably to extend the U of I community, but here's the thing: it creates its own community, and U of I would be well-served to re-oriented around it, rather than assuming that the only path forward is the reverse. Again, this is one of the most successful courses at Coursera. So maybe this is the direction for U of I to be heading...For example, I would anticipate offers from U or I for how they can get me into additional non-traditional business (or other) Coursera courses, or U of I courses or programs, or heck, teaching for U o I. Anyway, embrace the disruption! | course. I would rather see user-generated | Content | created by students and grads of | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Amazing content and a great refresher as a former marketing student looking to enhance my skills! | Amazing | Content | and a great refresher as a | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Good start to the course. Though I feel more energy and enthusiasm by the instructors would uplift the course. Some content is not prevalent at present (outdated). | instructors would uplift the course. Some | Content | is not prevalent at present (outdated). | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | The content of the course is very good. What I would improve are the Quizes; I'd concentrate more on key stuff, not include any questions concerning irrelevant details. Some of the assignment questions were also a bit unclear and the rating scales did not make sense at times. | The | Content | of the course is very good. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Content needs to be updated | | Content | needs to be updated | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Really liked the flow of content and the instructor. Some content is dated (RedLaser) and makes one assignment clunky since it was based on that app. Since this course focuses on digital and the inherent speed-to-market the platform affords, one would expect more up-to-date/timely examples for current content/exercises. Aside from that, the course was engaging and informative. Thanks, Aric! | Really liked the flow of | Content | and the instructor. Some content is | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Really liked the flow of content and the instructor. Some content is dated (RedLaser) and makes one assignment clunky since it was based on that app. Since this course focuses on digital and the inherent speed-to-market the platform affords, one would expect more up-to-date/timely examples for current content/exercises. Aside from that, the course was engaging and informative. Thanks, Aric! | of content and the instructor. Some | Content | is dated (RedLaser) and makes one | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | I think the content was quite interesting; as someone new to marketing, I was really looking forward to the lectures and exercises. However, the content was simply too much for me to complete. It's a bit ironic that a course about marketing missed its market. To give a bit more detail: there were 12 video lectures, 3 assignments that had to be done days before the end of the week to be peer-reviewed, and then I had to peer review others work, while also going through all the assigned reading. It seemed more like a courseload for a full time student or perhaps a part-time student. As online students typically are neither, I'm surprised the course content wasn't better managed. I take a lot of notes, so perhaps that's what slowed me down, but I also have a full time job and I intern on the weekends. I was hoping this course could easily be done in the evening hours. Other coursera courses provided an excellent balance of content and courseload, I'm disappointed that this course wasn't one of them. It seemed very useful and interesting. | I think the | Content | was quite interesting; as someone new | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | I think the content was quite interesting; as someone new to marketing, I was really looking forward to the lectures and exercises. However, the content was simply too much for me to complete. It's a bit ironic that a course about marketing missed its market. To give a bit more detail: there were 12 video lectures, 3 assignments that had to be done days before the end of the week to be peer-reviewed, and then I had to peer review others work, while also going through all the assigned reading. It seemed more like a courseload for a full time student or perhaps a part-time student. As online students typically are neither, I'm surprised the course content wasn't better managed. I take a lot of notes, so perhaps that's what slowed me down, but I also have a full time job and I intern on the weekends. I was hoping this course could easily be done in the evening hours. Other coursera courses provided an excellent balance of content and courseload, I'm disappointed that this course wasn't one of them. It seemed very useful and interesting. | the lectures and exercises. However, the | Content | was simply too much for me | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | I think the content was quite interesting; as someone new to marketing, I was really looking forward to the lectures and exercises. However, the content was simply too much for me to complete. It's a bit ironic that a course about marketing missed its market. To give a bit more detail: there were 12 video lectures, 3 assignments that had to be done days before the end of the week to be peer-reviewed, and then I had to peer review others work, while also going through all the assigned reading. It seemed more like a courseload for a full time student or perhaps a part-time student. As online students typically are neither, I'm surprised the course content wasn't better managed. I take a lot of notes, so perhaps that's what slowed me down, but I also have a full time job and I intern on the weekends. I was hoping this course could easily be done in the evening hours. Other coursera courses provided an excellent balance of content and courseload, I'm disappointed that this course wasn't one of them. It seemed very useful and interesting. | are neither, I'm surprised the course | Content | wasn't better managed. I take a | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | I think the content was quite interesting; as someone new to marketing, I was really looking forward to the lectures and exercises. However, the content was simply too much for me to complete. It's a bit ironic that a course about marketing missed its market. To give a bit more detail: there were 12 video lectures, 3 assignments that had to be done days before the end of the week to be peer-reviewed, and then I had to peer review others work, while also going through all the assigned reading. It seemed more like a courseload for a full time student or perhaps a part-time student. As online students typically are neither, I'm surprised the course content wasn't better managed. I take a lot of notes, so perhaps that's what slowed me down, but I also have a full time job and I intern on the weekends. I was hoping this course could easily be done in the evening hours. Other coursera courses provided an excellent balance of content and courseload, I'm disappointed that this course wasn't one of them. It seemed very useful and interesting. | courses provided an excellent balance of | Content | and courseload, I'm disappointed that this | Positive | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | I undertook this marketing course as a marketer keen to make sure I was up to date and thinking about new ideas. It was a shame redlaser.com is no longer active, however I'm sure there are other tools, the course content just needs to be updated. I liked the Quad elements but found the Quizzes a bit frustrating particularly when they asked questions for which the answer was covered in the next topic. Overall however, time well spend. Thanks to Aric and team. | there are other tools, the course | Content | just needs to be updated. I | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Well structured content and interesting assignments! | Well structured | Content | and interesting assignments! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Interesting content on digital trends. This course encourages you to think critically about how digital trends are changing the marketing landscape. Excellent delivery by the professor! | Interesting | Content | on digital trends. This course encourages | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Interesting content, practical exercises and well structured. | Interesting | Content | practical exercises and well structured. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | This course was outstanding in it's presentation, content, and seamless ability to progress. | course was outstanding in it's presentation, | Content | and seamless ability to progress. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Some good case studies and interesting content, but it's a 50,000 foot view of marketing. I was seeking a more technical and channel specific insights. This is much more conceptual and high level, so it was less useful for me. | Some good case studies and interesting | Content | but it's a 50, 000 foot | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Excellent course content | Excellent course | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | This is a great stuctured course wich the professor gives us tool to comprehend easyly the content given. It made a huge impact on my academical progress. | us tool to comprehend easyly the | Content | given. It made a huge impact | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Hated the course and the content. I truly regret investing my money on this course. | Hated the course and the | Content | I truly regret investing my money | Negative | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | The content is great and the professor is excelent to engage the audience. The excercises are focused to the practise of theory presented during the videolectures. | The | Content | is great and the professor is | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Great content, very informative, engaging and up to date. | Great | Content | very informative, engaging and up to | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Marketing in a Digital World presents many key concepts of modern-day marketing. The professor provides links to great reading material and resources that supplement the excellent video content hosted on Coursera. | resources that supplement the excellent video | Content | hosted on Coursera. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | excellent content and format. more than a recorded lecture, really an online education experience | excellent | Content | and format. more than a recorded | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | The course content was comprehensive, thorough and required note taking with preparation for quizzes. Solid academically. Some of the assignments required use of third party applications and websites that did function as anticipated or are no longer supported. Peer grading was very poor. It frequently seemed students did not read submissions, off handedly grading. At times comments did not match the scores, such as "nice work," or "good job," while giving only 3 stars. | The course | Content | was comprehensive, thorough and required note | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Excellent content and very good usage of resources to share knowledge. | Excellent | Content | and very good usage of resources | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | It has great content but assignments are promotions... Like, really, shamy promoted assignments. | It has great | Content | but assignments are promotions. . . | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Enjoyed the course, especially the awesome research work by other professors. However, was expecting a more content heavy course, which is a part of the full specialization, kinda unaffordable for me :( Anyways, great course, loved it! :) | professors. However, was expecting a more | Content | heavy course, which is a part | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Very good content and presentation | Very good | Content | and presentation | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | GREAT CONTENT!!! | GREAT | Content | ! ! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | IMHO a very superficial course. Lots of outdated material (user-generated content was a big thing 5 to 10 years ago, not anymore). Lacked going in depth. It discouraged me from pursuing the rest of the specialisation. | course. Lots of outdated material (user-generated | Content | was a big thing 5 to | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Great course, good content and easy pace. Introduced me to great new ideas like 3d printing and looking forward to the next course | Great course, good | Content | and easy pace. Introduced me to | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Well prepared videos from quality side. Content is nice. Gave a lot of new insights. Professor is great | Well prepared videos from quality side. | Content | is nice. Gave a lot of | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Loved the content. The instructor was great. The assignments were interesting and beneficial. I feel like I learnt a lot. The only aspect I didn't like was the "view from the quad" section. I quality wasn't great, and I didn't learn any new insights. Plus they always had the same 4 people they were interviewing so not a great sample size. | Loved the | Content | The instructor was great. The assignments | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Content was easy to understand and some of the core concepts have, in my case, found immediate professional application. This course is truly opening my mind to digital marketting, without making it overwhelming. Thank you. | | Content | was easy to understand and some | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Excellent content!! | Excellent | Content | ! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | Although the content was informational, the presenters were uninteresting and made watching the videos hard to do. | Although the | Content | was informational, the presenters were uninteresting | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | Content was easy to follow and the tutors delivered material appropriately | | Content | was easy to follow and the | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | Amazing and simple introduction to epidemiology! The additional resources resume the information very well and facilitate reviewing the content of the course | very well and facilitate reviewing the | Content | of the course | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | Course content was pretty detailed. I did not like that I had to write down pretty much every single word from each slide and that was said in order to make sure I could answer the quiz questions. Either the quiz questions were bad or it was taught in a confusing manner. I would go with the former. | Course | Content | was pretty detailed. I did not | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | Nice course, highly effective for other background. I suggest to improve the course content of week 4 & 5 which may be expanded with some other topics. | I suggest to improve the course | Content | of week 4 & 5 which | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | There is no real flow between videos and questions, not easy to follow. Good efford, good content, just wrong methodology for online training for 2015. | easy to follow. Good efford, good | Content | just wrong methodology for online training | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | The content was really neat and definitely not something I had been exposed to before. I really liked the quantitative parts of the course and wish there had been more time spent on that and more quiz questions on that. The reason I am ranking this 2 stars is that I felt the quizzes were unreasonably difficult (or perhaps they had bugs). Week 2 quiz I had to take multiple times and really couldn't figure out what the correct answer was. Looking at the discussion boards I believe my sentiment is shared. I have taken multiple coursera classes (Astronomy, Astrobiology, Calculus) and these are by far the most difficult quizes I have encountered. | The | Content | was really neat and definitely not | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | Useful content for health area.Easy to understand. Really love this course!!! | Useful | Content | for health area. Easy to understand. | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| fjjF0gVfEeW0KyIACxqWIg | Interesting content, good instructor | Interesting | Content | good instructor | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| fjjF0gVfEeW0KyIACxqWIg | Very full content of this course , the teacher does very well . Too bad it does not have subtitles in Spanish , it would be perfect if I had . | Very full | Content | of this course , the teacher | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| fM5baJoUEeW93wo8Ha4kow | Interesting content, but issues with broken links needed to complete quizzes while they were due. Needs better explanation of how to use other resources. Many of the quiz questions are arbitrary, rather than really testing knowledge gained in the class. The lectures are still useful, and would recommend doing this as a free course, but see no use in paying for a certificate on completion of the course. | Interesting | Content | but issues with broken links needed | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| fM5baJoUEeW93wo8Ha4kow | Very motivating lecturer and really satisfying contents! I am so satisfied with the courese metarial including the module itself and the reading matarials | Very motivating lecturer and really satisfying | Content | I am so satisfied with the | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| fM5baJoUEeW93wo8Ha4kow | VERY good content and classes! Some questions in the quizzes are confusing, and there was the trouble with the required reading for Week 3. The first Honors assignment is confusing - specially its very last input question. | VERY good | Content | and classes! Some questions in the | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| fM5baJoUEeW93wo8Ha4kow | Knowledgeable and enthusiastic professor plus super engaging content! I highly recommend this for anyone interested in lingu | and enthusiastic professor plus super engaging | Content | I highly recommend this for anyone | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| FnZcU7lhEeW6YA7MjVrgzw | a good course, excellent professor, and content in acordance with my expectation.... | a good course, excellent professor, and | Content | in acordance with my expectation. . | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Fo72zMekEeWrYA6c7hw6vQ | Content is not well adapted to a digital format. | | Content | is not well adapted to a | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| FOGKYF0gEeWK1woL5P9cGQ | Very interesting course, that covers the broad fundamentals of Urban Infrastructures. I liked how the content was made relevant by case-studies and quizzes that focus on your city. | Urban Infrastructures. I liked how the | Content | was made relevant by case-studies and | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| FOGKYF0gEeWK1woL5P9cGQ | Excellent content, excellent instruction!!!!!! Also, the interviews are a very valuable and informative,,, | Excellent | Content | excellent instruction! ! ! ! ! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great course material, great content structure | Great course material, great | Content | structure | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great course! I love the instructors, they go at just the right pace and the content was rather fun. Highly recommended. | just the right pace and the | Content | was rather fun. Highly recommended. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great content, I enjoy it ! | Great | Content | I enjoy it ! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great content | Great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Nice but lacking. Would like it to cover more content, specially around handlebars. | Would like it to cover more | Content | specially around handlebars. | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great course, thanks. Very interesting content. | Great course, thanks. Very interesting | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Pace and content of the course is just nice. However, it would be good if more lecture slides were provided. | Pace and | Content | of the course is just nice. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| fTnuinwaEeS7SCIACxCljA | Listening to Tucker Balch talk is a pain. He keeps repeating himself... Not much content in the latter half of the course | repeating himself. . . Not much | Content | in the latter half of the | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| fTnuinwaEeS7SCIACxCljA | I enjoyed this course. The content was good and the assignments challenging. The presenter was OK but he seemed a little unprepared at times. I think the course is a little dated in that the strategies taught simply don't work anymore, but as an introduction to some techniques and considerations for technical analysis then I recommend it. I also recommend that anyone considering this course without a strong python background takes some time to learn how to use Pandas - it will make your life much easier! | I enjoyed this course. The | Content | was good and the assignments challenging. | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| fTnuinwaEeS7SCIACxCljA | Easy to understand. Homework is somewhat challenging and the contents are very useful for novice. | Homework is somewhat challenging and the | Content | are very useful for novice. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| FVG4FkylEeWnWw63bhv00w | Brilliant content... Vraiment practique dans le contexte Africain. Merci | Brilliant | Content | . . Vraiment practique dans le | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| fZN4SVfiEeWsGQ6fKrurvQ | The content is interesting but the professor is bad at lecturing (lack of structure, some rambling). | The | Content | is interesting but the professor is | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| g4FwNDVyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This course was really excellent in comparison to many of the other courses in this specialization due to Professor Gavin Brown's use of metaphor and analogy to make more complicated content clear and Dr. Peter Keegan's interesting insights into taking minorities into consideration in our teaching practices. The case study of the Maori in New Zealand was extremely interesting. If more courses had been like this one, getting through the entire specialization would have been a much more enjoyable task and not nearly as arduous. | and analogy to make more complicated | Content | clear and Dr. Peter Keegan's interesting | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| G6m5MzTeEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Horrific. If I could rate this ZERO I would. The instructor will give you a one sentence explanation and definition for a term (literally, I downloaded the transcripts to help with my notes and assignments) and then say, "Now that we learned x..." and fly right into the next term. Worse, many of the sentences don't even make sense and completely incoherrant, even in the written transcript. I am having to go out and find additional textbooks to research the basic definitions of what is required to pass the course. There is even less explanation of real-world applications, examples, and demonstration. It is almost as though she tried to memorize a sheet of definitions and repeated them without the use of her notes. This results in a highly monotonous monologue with awkward gestures and little actual content. I was planning on going for the PR for Digital Media Certification, but I can't handle another course like this. It's a waste of time and money. | with awkward gestures and little actual | Content | I was planning on going for | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| G6m5MzTeEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I am sorry, but this course is made by PR specialist, people that should know how to talk to the public. Some teachers of this specialisation should been trained on how to behave in front of a camera. The content is nice but you repeat too many time the same stuff, in a very neutral voice, so it is really hard to keep watching the course. Thanks for sharing your knowledge, it is really helpful and rich, but as communication specialist, you can't just read a text, you have to live it. The source is important when releasing a message ! that's what you said ! The source should a good CV, but also has to know how to present the message. | in front of a camera. The | Content | is nice but you repeat too | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| g9KhGjk_EeWXuQopUhAqaw | Great content | Great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| g9KhGjk_EeWXuQopUhAqaw | Great delivery, good content separation. great assignments helped the information deliver at their bests. | Great delivery, good | Content | separation. great assignments helped the information | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| gbsG0MYYEeSsuSIAC8uEUA | This course is an excellent introduction to a fascinating subject. The content is challenging but presented in a way that relative beginners are able to absorb the concepts. The instructors are engaging and interesting. | introduction to a fascinating subject. The | Content | is challenging but presented in a | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | It has better content provided than ours. | It has better | Content | provided than ours. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | Excellent course for students with some finance background. Content is nicely paced and well illustrated through models and examples. The quizzes range from straight forward application to challenging (given there is no feedback on where you got a question incorrect). | for students with some finance background. | Content | is nicely paced and well illustrated | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | Awesome...the concepts have been explained in a superb way, the contents are itself high class, he example computations are jist wonderful. Although I am yet to finish it, I am just enthralled with it and have been a fan of coursera big time!! Expecting more detailed and rigorous course on financial engg which can be a testimony itself for an entry to the industry!! | explained in a superb way, the | Content | are itself high class, he example | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | This course is a great, from the perspective of how it is organized as well as the assignments provided at the end of each module. The way the content layout is well-suited and leads student step by step gaining insight to the mechanics of different financial derivatives and working on those assignments is a great method of pushing student spend time to understand how the mechanics works. Both instructors are great! and I appreciated greatly their effort as well as Coursera. The only one improvement I would suggest is that if a TA can be assigned for this course, it'll be a great help to all students. Thanks! | of each module. The way the | Content | layout is well-suited and leads student | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | Both the tutors are very nice and I like the way of explaining simple concepts and building upon them for higher level concepts. The course content is really nice. I wonder if part of Stochastic calculus and ito's lemma could also be added. Thanks for sharing such vast knowledge. | for higher level concepts. The course | Content | is really nice. I wonder if | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | The content of the course looked promising. But then I took a first look: the instructor is reading formulas from a slide. This is missing the whole point of a online class. There is no motivation for the formulars, no context why they are important. And from a learning point of view the course is very hard to follow. No real advantage compared to reading a book on that matter. I just took the "Economics of Money and Banking course", which is one of the best courses I ever attended (personally in class or online). There are other great courses on Coursera. And for easy introduction to some of the concepts Khan University courses are unmatched in accessability. Too bad that this course doesn't match up to the above examples. The topics would deserve that they are presented in a way that they can be understood by a wide audience. | The | Content | of the course looked promising. But | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | The content of this course is apropiate for drive the finances and risk, We be lear more about this course I am Engenier in Sofware, the know of finances is aplicable in anyware software. | The | Content | of this course is apropiate for | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| ggSJwHE8EeWxvQr3acyajw | A very informative and interesting course, a good cover of both behaviour and welfare. Each section was explained well, so no background knowledge was required. I appreciated the additional video content to explain concepts. I would have liked a little more information on disease and nutrition but I understand it is difficult to cover everything in a short course. | required. I appreciated the additional video | Content | to explain concepts. I would have | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Great way of learning Arduino, and a great way of providing info. by video lectures. The best part being the questions that are asked in between the lectures and that makes it more interactive virtually. The course content is no doubt enjoyable and its worth taking this course as it builds up our basic concepts of embedded systems. | it more interactive virtually. The course | Content | is no doubt enjoyable and its | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | It can be nice to walk through this process with a lecturer. Ian Harris does it well and knows the content well enough. Most of this content however is given sufficiently in the pamphlet with the Arduino Uno Starter Kit. Some problems and applications above and beyond the starter kit's intro guide would be nice and appropriate for the course. Additionally, given that this is also supposed to be an intro to C, a bit more detail and some programmatic problem solving in C would have also added good value to the course. | does it well and knows the | Content | well enough. Most of this content | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | It can be nice to walk through this process with a lecturer. Ian Harris does it well and knows the content well enough. Most of this content however is given sufficiently in the pamphlet with the Arduino Uno Starter Kit. Some problems and applications above and beyond the starter kit's intro guide would be nice and appropriate for the course. Additionally, given that this is also supposed to be an intro to C, a bit more detail and some programmatic problem solving in C would have also added good value to the course. | content well enough. Most of this | Content | however is given sufficiently in the | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Even though very basic ... but great content & great instructor | basic . . . but great | Content | & great instructor | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Nice course, with relevant content. | Nice course, with relevant | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | this course has a very good content very good instructor and increased my experience a lot | this course has a very good | Content | very good instructor and increased my | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Although most information in the course can be easily obtained via the internet, the packaging of the right content in the form of video lectures accelerates the learning process ten-fold! One can get started within the hour with Arduino programming without reading a single article on the web! Great course. One suggestion for improvement is to spend more time on the discussion library functions that are relevant to the IoT technology. | internet, the packaging of the right | Content | in the form of video lectures | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | The interface of the classes is too straight, not very flexible. It almost looks like a real classroom, which isn't good in case we're at home learning by ourselves. Still, it has a very good content. | Still, it has a very good | Content | | Positive | 0.9 | 3.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | not a great amount of content | not a great amount of | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Excellent Professor. Great pace and content | Excellent Professor. Great pace and | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Introduces the basics of Arduino and C programming. Not a lot of content but gets you ready for the next course in the 4-course Specialisation. | C programming. Not a lot of | Content | but gets you ready for the | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| GixeETxVEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | Excellent course! The course content was informative and the instructor kept the flow going at a nice pace and was interesting to listen to. I highly recommend this course! | Excellent course! The course | Content | was informative and the instructor kept | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| GixeETxVEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | I'm a new horse owner. I've taken this course multiple times. It is the BEST introduction to being a responsible horse owner that I have found. I can't say enough good things. Even the content that didn't apply to my situation | say enough good things. Even the | Content | that didn't apply to my situation | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| GixeETxVEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | Great introductory content to Equines! | Great introductory | Content | to Equines! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| GixeETxVEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | I've owned and ridden horses for 20+ years and found plenty of content in this course of value. I definitely recommend it for the horse obsessed and inquisitive folks! | 20+ years and found plenty of | Content | in this course of value. I | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| GixeETxVEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | Excellen content | Excellen | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| GkyTjuR5EeWpUQ6vdoq9ZQ | Very little real content or information. | Very little real | Content | or information. | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| GkyTjuR5EeWpUQ6vdoq9ZQ | Contents where we are referring to the statistics of 2012 should be updated. | | Content | where we are referring to the | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| GMSg0yWsEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | The course had some useful content, but there was too much time spent on USA centred materials for an iavailabe course. | The course had some useful | Content | but there was too much time | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| GMSg0yWsEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | My 2-years old niece in China has just been diagnosed as a ASD child. I took this class to help the parents understand the disorder and take prompt steps to start intervention when she is still young. The class is concise and informative. The 5 week contents provide just enough information for parents who have ASD children that has just been diagnosed to briefly understand the challenge and solutions of having an ASD child. I find the videos that illustrates how ASD children behave and what the proper intervention needed from parents, friends, and teachers very useful. By participating the class, I understand what ASD disorder is and I will pass what I have learnt to our big family so everyone has a correct and positive perspective to ASD and offer help to alleviate the anxiety for the parents. This is a very good course. | concise and informative. The 5 week | Content | provide just enough information for parents | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| GMSg0yWsEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | The course is quite amazing.. It improved my knowledge regarding behavioral changes and role of educators and therapist in this field.. I must appreciate the way of delivering lectures and the content.. I wish i could attend classes in UC Davis Mind institute as i found this spectrum quite interesting... I hope other classes would be conducted regarding Autism or other neurodevelopmental disorders with further content at coursera so that i could better understand the process of dealing with those suffering individuals.. Thankyou v. Much the instructors :) | way of delivering lectures and the | Content | . I wish i could attend | Negative | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| GMSg0yWsEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | The course is quite amazing.. It improved my knowledge regarding behavioral changes and role of educators and therapist in this field.. I must appreciate the way of delivering lectures and the content.. I wish i could attend classes in UC Davis Mind institute as i found this spectrum quite interesting... I hope other classes would be conducted regarding Autism or other neurodevelopmental disorders with further content at coursera so that i could better understand the process of dealing with those suffering individuals.. Thankyou v. Much the instructors :) | or other neurodevelopmental disorders with further | Content | at coursera so that i could | Negative | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| GMSg0yWsEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | This course is informative and introductory. It has a value in generating a general awareness about ASD. It would be useful for parents and learners who are new to disability issues. The content can be used for introducing and familiarizing with clinical practice with ASD. But this course has the limitation on following grounds 1. The contents of the course are coloured with medical perspective and with pathological view point 2. At some point this course appeared like an advertisement for the institute and its research work 3. This course tried to cover too many things like theory, practice, research, experience and so on. But at the end it failed to do justice all 4. Finally the contents are infected with virus of medicine, market and military science. Terms such as intervention, package, therapy so many terminology. The unfaithful use of "social" in few instance look like an altruism to social science by dominant discipline. I am sure that this course has market. Evidence based research/ practice will corroborate it. Best wishes | are new to disability issues. The | Content | can be used for introducing and | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| GMSg0yWsEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | This course is informative and introductory. It has a value in generating a general awareness about ASD. It would be useful for parents and learners who are new to disability issues. The content can be used for introducing and familiarizing with clinical practice with ASD. But this course has the limitation on following grounds 1. The contents of the course are coloured with medical perspective and with pathological view point 2. At some point this course appeared like an advertisement for the institute and its research work 3. This course tried to cover too many things like theory, practice, research, experience and so on. But at the end it failed to do justice all 4. Finally the contents are infected with virus of medicine, market and military science. Terms such as intervention, package, therapy so many terminology. The unfaithful use of "social" in few instance look like an altruism to social science by dominant discipline. I am sure that this course has market. Evidence based research/ practice will corroborate it. Best wishes | limitation on following grounds 1. The | Content | of the course are coloured with | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| GMSg0yWsEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | This course is informative and introductory. It has a value in generating a general awareness about ASD. It would be useful for parents and learners who are new to disability issues. The content can be used for introducing and familiarizing with clinical practice with ASD. But this course has the limitation on following grounds 1. The contents of the course are coloured with medical perspective and with pathological view point 2. At some point this course appeared like an advertisement for the institute and its research work 3. This course tried to cover too many things like theory, practice, research, experience and so on. But at the end it failed to do justice all 4. Finally the contents are infected with virus of medicine, market and military science. Terms such as intervention, package, therapy so many terminology. The unfaithful use of "social" in few instance look like an altruism to social science by dominant discipline. I am sure that this course has market. Evidence based research/ practice will corroborate it. Best wishes | do justice all 4. Finally the | Content | are infected with virus of medicine, | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| goJ9vXd_EeWtpg5GoAM5Iw | Excellent content! | Excellent | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| gpAI9GK4EeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | great course and content, it gives you a clear view of how waste management is done nowadays in developing countries and prepares you to innovate on the upcoming future of a circular economy | great course and | Content | it gives you a clear view | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| gpAI9GK4EeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | Great content and very technical. Lecturers explain in detail all aspects of municipal waste. | Great | Content | and very technical. Lecturers explain in | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| gpAI9GK4EeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | Excellent content and the way of explaining things especially the course notes and case studies. | Excellent | Content | and the way of explaining things | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| gpAI9GK4EeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | The course content is very relevant and useful. I would like to suggest to include overview of more MSW management options. e.g. Refuse Derived Fuel, etc. | The course | Content | is very relevant and useful. I | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| gpAI9GK4EeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | This course was outstanding. Tutors were excellent, materials amazing and the contents were pretty useful. 100% recommended! | were excellent, materials amazing and the | Content | were pretty useful. 100% recommended! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| gpAI9GK4EeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | Great course that delivered the objectives- organized and structured, logical and informative materials and content delivery, fantastic professors, guest speakers, and case studies. Introduced key principles and considerations regarding municipal waste management and considered key elements to manage when developing a waste management strategy. | structured, logical and informative materials and | Content | delivery, fantastic professors, guest speakers, and | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| gpAI9GK4EeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | Great content, professionally presented. Very thought-provoking and based on some really valuable resources. | Great | Content | professionally presented. Very thought-provoking and based | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| gpAI9GK4EeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | Brilliant course and the mentors are simply superb. Excellent content with perfect articulation . A big thanks to all of you. Warm regards, Rajeev | the mentors are simply superb. Excellent | Content | with perfect articulation . A big | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| gpAI9GK4EeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | The course is well structured and has sufficient content to educate the layman on the intricacies of the SWM. !! It would be fairly relevant if some inputs on the application of Plasma technology in waste treatment. Also information about equipment manufacturers in thermochemical route would have been helpful as well. | is well structured and has sufficient | Content | to educate the layman on the | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Great content, good practice using real-world business data. | Great | Content | good practice using real-world business data. | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| gPmGQZoiEeWXlw53nZA94w | great classes and very well structure of the main content | very well structure of the main | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| gPmGQZoiEeWXlw53nZA94w | excellent course in terms of content and pace. nicely designed course that gives you a complete understanding of the subject. | excellent course in terms of | Content | and pace. nicely designed course that | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| gSfwG3HcEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Content is relevant and concise, with enough materials to research or use if one wished to further their knowledge on the subject. Lectures are mostly lively, kept to the point, and presented with real life examples that aid comprehension and prevent monotony. In my opinion this course achieves its goal of teaching the fundamentals. However, if one wished to get a solid grasp of this topic additional work on their behalf would be required outside of the course. | | Content | is relevant and concise, with enough | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| gSfwG3HcEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | The University of Lund provided a great course. The content was rich and well presented by a team of dedicated professors. Thank you! | Lund provided a great course. The | Content | was rich and well presented by | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| gt5ybBU-EeWhTg59fTWfpQ | Fab! Mind opening content. | Fab! Mind opening | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| gt5ybBU-EeWhTg59fTWfpQ | There could have been more content and the course been more challenging, otherwise loved it! | There could have been more | Content | and the course been more challenging, | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| gt5ybBU-EeWhTg59fTWfpQ | Great interviews inside the course content! | Great interviews inside the course | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| gttJnUtZEeW4rRLEP0z9Bw | As a seasoned teacher, 20 years, much of this content is intuitive or has already been in place in my classroom. The course validated much of the methodology I already use, but I did lose interest from time to time. | teacher, 20 years, much of this | Content | is intuitive or has already been | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| gttJnUtZEeW4rRLEP0z9Bw | I am an intern school psychologist, and was concerned that the content of the specialization would not benefit me as a practitioner. I was going to just take this Assessing Achievement with the ELL in Mind and not the other courses. I am eternally grateful that I decided to take all three courses in the series. I have a better appreciation for both instructors and students. Much of the content and strategies benefit all learners, including myself. I would highly recommend this class, and the | psychologist, and was concerned that the | Content | of the specialization would not benefit | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| gttJnUtZEeW4rRLEP0z9Bw | I am an intern school psychologist, and was concerned that the content of the specialization would not benefit me as a practitioner. I was going to just take this Assessing Achievement with the ELL in Mind and not the other courses. I am eternally grateful that I decided to take all three courses in the series. I have a better appreciation for both instructors and students. Much of the content and strategies benefit all learners, including myself. I would highly recommend this class, and the | instructors and students. Much of the | Content | and strategies benefit all learners, including | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| gttJnUtZEeW4rRLEP0z9Bw | WOW! I learned so much my head is spinning--EXCELLENT Course! Amazing Content! Fantastic Examples! Well Organized! Superb Teachers! Thank you for the opportunity to learn! | my head is spinning--EXCELLENT Course! Amazing | Content | Fantastic Examples! Well Organized! Superb Teachers! | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course content was systematically organized with increasing complex algorithms covered as the weeks progressed. Prof Ng's enthusiasm for the subject also made the course enjoyable. Thank you so much. | The course | Content | was systematically organized with increasing complex | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Awesome course. The details and well explained content for professor Ng is the key of successful of this course. | course. The details and well explained | Content | for professor Ng is the key | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Just completed the course myself and I have to say this is a great course for anyone who wants to get a comprehensive understanding of Machine Learning. First of all, the content of the course is very well structured. It covers a lot of machine learning algorithms and also includes a lot of practical applications. Professor Ng is very gifted in teaching and he can explain some difficult topics in very simple terms. I also found he is very engaging and the quick questions inserted in the middle of the videos are very helpful to keep the students focused on the lecture. The programming assignments are at the right level of difficulty, and I found the instruction for each assignment works like a great summary of the corresponding materials. Didn't use their discussion forum much, but for a couple times I used, the mentor was able to respond in a very timely manner. Overall, this is a great course and I am so happy to be able to take it myself. Thank you, Professor Ng! | Machine Learning. First of all, the | Content | of the course is very well | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Fantastic learning experience for anyone who wants to start learning or needs to brush up on a few topics. The content is very well explained and the assignments take you step by step to help you solve the problems | up on a few topics. The | Content | is very well explained and the | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It was very fun! I really enjoyed the videos and programming assignments. I think the class contents are well-paced and Andrew is really good at explaining. Thank you! | programming assignments. I think the class | Content | are well-paced and Andrew is really | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | So good content and teacher. Thanks you Andrew. | So good | Content | and teacher. Thanks you Andrew. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great methodology! Interesting content and easy to follow even if the student does not have a strong background. | Great methodology! Interesting | Content | and easy to follow even if | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excelent Course. Great teacher and great content. Thank you! | Excelent Course. Great teacher and great | Content | Thank you! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I took this course seriously and worked all the way till the last assignment. As per my experience and understanding the course contents are quite dense, but the lucid and succinct presentation made it quite comprehensible and interesting. I was amazed to find how well the concepts were formulated in a suitable mathematical modelling. I wholeheartedly thank Prof. Ng and the support stuffs for this wonderful course. | my experience and understanding the course | Content | are quite dense, but the lucid | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | After completing the Machine Learning Course and after going through all of these videos and assignments, now I can say that I have learnt a lot from this course and content of the course have good quality and helps you expertise this field. Thanks a ton Prof. Andrew NG. | a lot from this course and | Content | of the course have good quality | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Well organized content and delivery | Well organized | Content | and delivery | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great! Explained wonderfully! content is worth it! | Great! Explained wonderfully! | Content | is worth it! | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Exceptional course! I recomend it to everyone trying to learn machine learning. Awesome tutor, awesome content !!! | learn machine learning. Awesome tutor, awesome | Content | ! ! ! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really solid course content, lucidly taught by Professor Andrew, at a pace neither too fast nor too slow. Got to learn a lot about octave, vector mathematics and a bunch of other stuffs apart from machine learning, which I may add, seemed quite real world and logically sound, in spite of being quite advanced both in terms of the engineering and mathematics involved. I can thank Professor Andrew only so much, but I must also add that the amount of materials available in the Resources and Discussion Forum, also helps this course to be one of the most enjoyable one that I have taken till date. Ps - Thanks to this course I know how exactly Coursera will process my Review and what exactly it will do with it. Cheers :) | Really solid course | Content | lucidly taught by Professor Andrew, at | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | exceptional content, easy to understand and great explanation | exceptional | Content | easy to understand and great explanation | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I am a big advocate of MOOCs as it definitely democratize education. Only challenge with MOOCs is that over time they become too monotonous and one looses out the interest. I've tried to take up few machine learning courses over past few years, but never got past first few steps. I am still in the going through the course, but so far it has been an outstanding experience. Not only the content is engaging, it has been really simplified. If you're new to Machine learning, I can't recommend this highly enough. | an outstanding experience. Not only the | Content | is engaging, it has been really | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | About me: I'm a professional industrial control systems programmer. About this course: It contains challenging math for someone who has been out of school for 25 years. I'm no where close to the 3 hour time estimate for the exercises (more like +12 hours) but the course content and presentation is exceptional. This is the course that is finally giving me a working nuts a bolts understanding of machine learning, AI, and neural networks. | like +12 hours) but the course | Content | and presentation is exceptional. This is | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is one great course which is exciting throughout all the weeks of content. You'll be thorough with almost all basic concepts of machine learning by the end. But programming assignments are needed to be submitted using matlab or octave, Introducing python would be a great update to this. | exciting throughout all the weeks of | Content | You'll be thorough with almost all | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent content and clear understanding of all ML Concepts. A must course for ML Aspirants. | Excellent | Content | and clear understanding of all ML | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent - both content and delivery wise. Thanks very much... More than certifying the course, I believe I've learned immensely from this "not so easy" course, and was able to related quite a lot to some of the work I did on ANNs (MLP) back in the 90s. | Excellent - both | Content | and delivery wise. Thanks very much. | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good introduction to machine learning. The content is fairly basic, it's up to you is you want to go deeper into the subject. Only one downside, the quality of videos is low. | good introduction to machine learning. The | Content | is fairly basic, it's up to | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent work from mister Ng, everything flows. Maybe just a note on the exams where the difficulty sometimes spike a bit from the content of the courses. But you'll always get pass it if you try hard enough. | sometimes spike a bit from the | Content | of the courses. But you'll always | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I am confident on the content I learned in this course that I will be able to deliver and work efficiently in Machine Learning projects. Thank you. | I am confident on the | Content | I learned in this course that | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | amazing way of teaching best content can't imagine machine learning can be made so easy | amazing way of teaching best | Content | can't imagine machine learning can be | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great Introductory course about Machine Learning. Not knowing anything about ML, came out understanding a good bit. The examples in the course gives you a real world applications of ML and helps you understand the content. Highly recommend this course to anyone. | ML and helps you understand the | Content | Highly recommend this course to anyone. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It's a great Course overall. Its Content is great and the method of teaching is amazing. | It's a great Course overall. Its | Content | is great and the method of | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Easy to understand and very nice relevant contents. Way the lectures are delivered made it much easier to understand | to understand and very nice relevant | Content | Way the lectures are delivered made | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Amazing and easy to follow content. Many thanks to Andrew NG for making this course available. | Amazing and easy to follow | Content | Many thanks to Andrew NG for | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Stunning amazing content, which is clear and quite fun . Amazing insight to model selection! | Stunning amazing | Content | which is clear and quite fun | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course both with quality content and teaching. Loved the way Prof NG taught this class. Really happy to complete this course. | Excellent course both with quality | Content | and teaching. Loved the way Prof | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Comprehensive course, amazing mentor and very good content. | course, amazing mentor and very good | Content | | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course content. A must for anyone in the machine-learning industry! | Excellent course | Content | A must for anyone in the | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course. Complex content explained pretty well. | Excellent course. Complex | Content | explained pretty well. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great introductory course to machine learning. There were some quirks to workout in the assignments and the course could use a refresh to make it more current (content is from 2011, I think). However, many of the learnings will build a strong foundation upon which any learner can continue into the interesting discipline of machine and deep learning. | refresh to make it more current | Content | is from 2011, I think). However, | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very useful course. Content and structure of the course will improve our view on data. | Very useful course. | Content | and structure of the course will | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Thank you so much for offering this course! It has so much contents and explains those concepts very well. I love the programming assignments and the availability of different helps I can easily get from this course. | this course! It has so much | Content | and explains those concepts very well. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course, Andrew Ng does a good job at easing you into this complex subject, particularly for somebody like myself without much maths background. Looking at other video courses on the subject, I think more interactive visualisations could've been a great help, for example to gain some intuition about polynomials with different input parameters. Drawing lines on screen works, but I've had many revelations when working with the interactive tools linked from the wiki content. In some course exercises, the tutor and lecturer disagreed on the approach (e.g. vectorised vs. iterative), so the videos/PDFs were inconsistent with discussions/tutorials - a bit confusing. | interactive tools linked from the wiki | Content | In some course exercises, the tutor | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Loved it. Perfectly paced. Great content. Well presented. Kudos & many-a-thanks to the whole team! | Loved it. Perfectly paced. Great | Content | Well presented. Kudos & many-a-thanks to | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Fantastic course - very interesting content and assignments are perfectly designed to come to grips with the content. Very engaging lecturer. | Fantastic course - very interesting | Content | and assignments are perfectly designed to | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Fantastic course - very interesting content and assignments are perfectly designed to come to grips with the content. Very engaging lecturer. | to come to grips with the | Content | Very engaging lecturer. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A lot of content, covering range of topics , very clearly presented and well prepared training assingments. | A lot of | Content | covering range of topics , very | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very easy-to-understand but in-depth course contents, tough some assignments contained certain bugs. Highly recommended. | Very easy-to-understand but in-depth course | Content | tough some assignments contained certain bugs. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | 5 start content. | 5 start | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Amazing contents and excellent Mentors | Amazing | Content | and excellent Mentors | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course is very well organized covering a lot of topics. The assignments are mapped well with the course content and help to understand the system development well. Professor ANg is very clear in his explanations and makes you feel very comfortable even with the difficult concepts. I highly recommend this course if you plan to learn machine learning using open source tools and practical examples. | are mapped well with the course | Content | and help to understand the system | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Its a good course for Machine Learning and content is thorough that even beginner/non-coders wouldn't miss a step. | good course for Machine Learning and | Content | is thorough that even beginner/non-coders wouldn't | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course material and lectures by Prof Ng. Perhaps the theoretical content could be increased a bit. | by Prof Ng. Perhaps the theoretical | Content | could be increased a bit. | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent lecture. Very clear and informational. The depth of content is just right. Great course. Looking for more courses like this. | clear and informational. The depth of | Content | is just right. Great course. Looking | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is excellent course for anyone to understand what machine learning is all about. Prof. Andrew does a great job of explaining the concepts candidly. The course content is well designed both is content and structure. Would love to see an advanced version of the course where we apply the learning on some complex real world problems. | explaining the concepts candidly. The course | Content | is well designed both is content | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is excellent course for anyone to understand what machine learning is all about. Prof. Andrew does a great job of explaining the concepts candidly. The course content is well designed both is content and structure. Would love to see an advanced version of the course where we apply the learning on some complex real world problems. | content is well designed both is | Content | and structure. Would love to see | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course content helps in successfully writing code for the Machine Learning algorithms taught lucidly by the professor. Thank you sir Dr. Andrew Ng ! One of the gurus I will never forget! | The course | Content | helps in successfully writing code for | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I can highly recommend this course to anyone interest in the topic of machine learning. The course not only provides a nice and broad overview of the topic, but also offers some well prepared programming tasks that are easy to work through helping to deepen the understanding of the courses content. Moreover, Prof. Ng offers useful advice for practical application of machine learning throughout the course. However, for my taste the lessons could assume a higher level of the basic knowledge of mathematics of the attendees, which would get some lessons more to the point. All in all Professor Ng did a great job and it was a joy to follow his course. Thanks for that. | deepen the understanding of the courses | Content | Moreover, Prof. Ng offers useful advice | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good overview of machine learning. In general focuses more on how to do, but due to course length skipped on some of the how or why in certain topics. Good mentor responses. Lecture video pause points are bugged. Lecture and assignments are quite detailed to walk you through it. Course content not designed to be difficult. Weeks are not very balanced. Some weeks take longer than other weeks, and you don't really know until the week starts. One thing I really dislike is you can't take notes online while watching the video. You'll have to do it elsewhere (on paper, on notepad). There isn't a quick summary of topics covered in the video you can go to. This would help if you wanted to rewatch a certain part but couldn't recall which video it was in. | to walk you through it. Course | Content | not designed to be difficult. Weeks | Negative | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course. Although it is not so new, the content is still up to date and applicable in real ML problems. | it is not so new, the | Content | is still up to date and | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The content is useful, but too verbose. | The | Content | is useful, but too verbose. | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Easy to understand. Great teacher, passionate and professional. Some content a bit (out)dated, but still very much applicable today. | Great teacher, passionate and professional. Some | Content | a bit (out)dated, but still very | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good pacing, very interesting content. The exercises are moderately challenging and help better integrate the content. | Good pacing, very interesting | Content | The exercises are moderately challenging and | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good pacing, very interesting content. The exercises are moderately challenging and help better integrate the content. | challenging and help better integrate the | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Exceptional course. My thanks and congratulations to Andrew Ng and Coursera for this offering. I especially appreciated Professor Ng's combination of academic (Stanford) and real world (Baidu, Google) experience, and his efforts to help students gain an intuitive understanding of the content. I think anyone who wants an overview of Machine Learning will find this very helpful. | gain an intuitive understanding of the | Content | I think anyone who wants an | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course had fantastic content, and very clear lecturing style, and minimal errors. At times I felt the lectures were a bit too long and repetitive, and found myself jumping through them quickly. I found that Andrew took minutes to say something that should only take 10 seconds; but I am aware that most students would appreciate this. The assignments were great, only with a few bits of information lacking and one assignment requiring me to dig around in the Discussion Boards for a solution (an error in the supplied code was causing me to fail the assignment). If I could give 4.5 stars I would, but I can't give the course 5 stars given the points above. Overall: Very enjoyable and insightful! | This course had fantastic | Content | and very clear lecturing style, and | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great teacher and content. | Great teacher and | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | GREAT TEACHER and GREAT CONTENT! Thanks! | GREAT TEACHER and GREAT | Content | Thanks! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The content of the course is really great. Could we have some more like this?:) | The | Content | of the course is really great. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course, covers a lot of content and is easy to understand. | Excellent course, covers a lot of | Content | and is easy to understand. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great content! Absolute MUST for every maker & startup & company that are willing to make something clever out of data-mining! | Great | Content | Absolute MUST for every maker & | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Its an excellent course. It gives exposure to variety of problems. Further, the basic concepts are explained nicely without going very deep in mathematics. The programming assignments are simply fantastic and it will enhance the understanding of the course content. | enhance the understanding of the course | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great content that's well explained, with exercises that suit the content well. Content is also presented in a friendly and manageable manner, making going through the course much easier. Be wary of the middle weeks though, as the content in those are heavier than the rest of the course! | Great | Content | that's well explained, with exercises that | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great content that's well explained, with exercises that suit the content well. Content is also presented in a friendly and manageable manner, making going through the course much easier. Be wary of the middle weeks though, as the content in those are heavier than the rest of the course! | explained, with exercises that suit the | Content | well. Content is also presented in | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great content that's well explained, with exercises that suit the content well. Content is also presented in a friendly and manageable manner, making going through the course much easier. Be wary of the middle weeks though, as the content in those are heavier than the rest of the course! | exercises that suit the content well. | Content | is also presented in a friendly | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great content that's well explained, with exercises that suit the content well. Content is also presented in a friendly and manageable manner, making going through the course much easier. Be wary of the middle weeks though, as the content in those are heavier than the rest of the course! | the middle weeks though, as the | Content | in those are heavier than the | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Exceptional content and absolutely amazing tutor. | Exceptional | Content | and absolutely amazing tutor. | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Best course content! | Best course | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Andrew explains things in a very clear way. Some of the quizes seems redundant, ie., ask very basic questions which can be answered with common sense w/o knowing the content, but all in all give good intro. I gained enough knowledge to challenge PhDs specializing in ML when we brainstorm stuff. | with common sense w/o knowing the | Content | but all in all give good | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Amazing course! Clear and progressive, with a lot of contents. A must take! | and progressive, with a lot of | Content | A must take! | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Hi. This is a great course which would be made even better with the small change I describe below. I was referred here by Nicole who was handling this as Support Case #1188060. I understand the mentors have been seeking this improvement for some time. Please let me know if I can clarify or assist in any way. Thanks in advance. ---- Support Case #1188060 ---- Hi. I'm writing regarding the Machine Learning course taught by Andrew Ng of Stanford. I have learned there is a compilation of "errata," known errors in the videos and course materials for each week, which has been made available in per-week links like the following: https://share.coursera.org/wiki/index.php/ML:Errata:_Week_7 I found these links only after digging through discussions. In my own discussions afterwards, I learned that I wasn't the only one having trouble finding the errata. Apparently it's a long-standing problem which creates extra work for mentors as well as slowing down students. Would it be possible to provide the errata links, or a link to the Machine Learning Course wiki, in a dedicated section of the Course Content? This would help a lot of people. Please see the discussion below for more perspective. https://www.coursera.org/learn/machine-learning/discussions/RQNTlee5EeWTdBIkpCpI1Q Thanks for your consideration. Tom :-) | a dedicated section of the Course | Content | This would help a lot of | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent class, in terms of specific content and didactical approach. All addressed topics are well motivated with real examples, and elaborated in great details, at the right pace. Lecture videos are clear, very accurate, and very accessible at the same time. Lab exercises are challenging and very much helping in fully grasping the concepts. One of the best classes I have ever attended, much better of many courses I attended in my university years. Thank you very much Professor Andrew Ng, Coursera, and Stanford ! | Excellent class, in terms of specific | Content | and didactical approach. All addressed topics | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent pacing, content, instructional technique, and assignments. I particularly like how all the algorithms are grounded in real world problems and the assignments are using real data to demonstrate how the algorithms are applied. | Excellent pacing, | Content | instructional technique, and assignments. I particularly | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is amazing. Really clear, informative, and hands-on. The content does not get too bogged down with complex details, and really gives a great overview of many of the most used machine learning algorithms and machine learning applications. | Really clear, informative, and hands-on. The | Content | does not get too bogged down | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great and Engaging videos , Just enough time is given to assimilate the course content . Love the exercises. | is given to assimilate the course | Content | . Love the exercises. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is a great introductory course. The course materials are carefully organized, to avoid lengthy mathematical content, yet conveying the key idea of machine learning. The selection of the topic also seems quite reasonable. This course builds a somewhat solid ground for beginners. After finishing this course, one can either try to move towards the more theoretical side, maybe by reading the books such as Learning From Data by Yaser Abu-Mostafa, or the lecture notes/video of the Standford course CS229, or the more applied and practical side, depending on the preference. | carefully organized, to avoid lengthy mathematical | Content | yet conveying the key idea of | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good, well balanced between theory and practice. Content was very carefully designed to suit people with different backgrounds/experience and gives you enough base on the subject so that you can start using it or enough to research and dive deeper into the subjects. | well balanced between theory and practice. | Content | was very carefully designed to suit | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | There's some great material in here, though it doesn't have the maturity in terms of content development as many newer courses. A lot of the material is very accessible, but some is less so. | have the maturity in terms of | Content | development as many newer courses. A | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Adding more contents may make it even better. | Adding more | Content | may make it even better. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Learned a lot of new concepts, perfectly organized content and assignments. I strongly recommend this course for the students in the domain of Data Science. | lot of new concepts, perfectly organized | Content | and assignments. I strongly recommend this | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | beyond fantastic. Have learned so much, and this is the best taught online course I have done to date. The content is fascinating, and is taught in a really accessible way. | I have done to date. The | Content | is fascinating, and is taught in | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I've always had passion for AI and in particular Machine Learning. The Machine Learning course offered by Stanford University was a great experience (And very challenging too !). I'm glad I didn't let my busy life make excuses for not taking this course Thank you Coursera, Thank you Stanford University And Thank you Andrew Ng for presenting the course contents in your lectures | Andrew Ng for presenting the course | Content | in your lectures | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | excellent content | excellent | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really nice introduction to Machine Learning. It contains essential contents which is not difficult and also not easy. | to Machine Learning. It contains essential | Content | which is not difficult and also | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Clear content brings great ease in understanding. | Clear | Content | brings great ease in understanding. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The teaching content is excellent. The instructor's explanation is clear and intuitive. It would be more helpful if the instructor can address the forums at times rather than leaving it entirely to the TAs. | The teaching | Content | is excellent. The instructor's explanation is | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course, perfectly paced and detailed. The professor Andrew Ng succeeds in creating a comfortable atmosphere and is easy to follow. As a beginner in machine learning, I appreciated the fact that the contents cover the most important aspects of machine learning, without diving in too fast in the underlying mathematics and computational details. I think I need go deeper in these aspects now, but these lessons are rich of practical and methodological tips that i'm sure even advanced engineers would need. Last but not least, the Octave/Matlab hands-on exercises permit a deeper understanding of the algorithms, and to realize what remained misunderstood after the lectures. I am happy that I decided to start (and to end) this course. This was my first on Coursera : there will be others. Many thanks to Mr Ng, to the mentors that helped us on the discussion boards, and to the coursera team in general. Arnaud. | I appreciated the fact that the | Content | cover the most important aspects of | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Professor Andrew Ng has presented the content in a really learner friendly way. The student absorbs the knowledge without even noticing. 10 weeks later, you wake up - and just know it all. Great job Mr Professor. | Professor Andrew Ng has presented the | Content | in a really learner friendly way. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Contents are carefully organized with good exercises. The course covers the topics which are required to apply machine learning to real-world problems at basic levels. The topics are consistently addressed with motivation, theory, and implementation in order. The exercises are provided to teach the concepts of machine learning and their applications. Prof. Andrew Ng tried to eliminate technical barriers in writing codes in Matlab and let students understand the concepts fully. This class is the first choice of learning Machine Leaning for a self-driven learner. | | Content | are carefully organized with good exercises. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I am half way through this course and I feel this is the best online course available today. The content is superb, the subject is interesting and the instructor/the professor explains the topic in a very easy way. One more thing which makes this course great is the tools - the quizes and assignment framework (including the submission process) is very well designed. I aim to pursue career in Machine Learning at some point in time in (near) future. I am sure I am on right track. Anyone new to ML must start with this course. | best online course available today. The | Content | is superb, the subject is interesting | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent teacher and content!!!! | Excellent teacher and | Content | ! ! ! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great content, very helpful. Special thanks to Andrew. | Great | Content | very helpful. Special thanks to Andrew. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Information presented was well explained, efficient yet thorough. Assignments matched the content well and afforded learning at a challenging yet manageable levels. | efficient yet thorough. Assignments matched the | Content | well and afforded learning at a | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course fully filled my expectations. The content is interesting and each part is given adequate treatment. All topics are exceptionally explained and the homework is not difficult and very illustrative on how to apply all gained knowledge. | course fully filled my expectations. The | Content | is interesting and each part is | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This was my first class on Coursera and I couldn't have been more happier about it. Content is very well presented, mathematics standing behind various ML models is served to the listener with just enough details to understand it, but not to add any confusion. Assignments are great and really help you to understand how algorithms works. The only thing I'd change is questions about Octave in Quizes. Octave is very nice tool, no doubt, but I personally want to stick to R language and I really didn't want to memorize certain functions or syntax that Octave is using. Great job! I can recommend this class to anyone with a clean conscious. | have been more happier about it. | Content | is very well presented, mathematics standing | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A lot of content to work through, but well worth it. An excellent professor, concepts were explained clearly, and the Programming assignments were just hard enough to be challenging, but not overwhelming. | A lot of | Content | to work through, but well worth | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | the lecture is great !! Prof. explained every complicated concept and theory in the way that easy to understand and remember. The programming assignments are also carefully designed to help us further capture the main points of course contents as well as exposing us to some real applications. | capture the main points of course | Content | as well as exposing us to | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Awesome lecture content for beginner and intermediate student craving for the latest statistical skills. Exercises are well-designed and helpful to the learning experience. Definitely recommended! | Awesome lecture | Content | for beginner and intermediate student craving | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I am really satisfied with the course. I'm really glad I stuck with it. Looking forward to putting it to practice. The way the course is organized is really good. It's amazing to look back in all the subjects studied and how each one is built on top of each other. It is also good how there is always a programming exercise that really makes you think about the content studied on that lesson. I think the videos really need some post production. Some videos could be shortened since there is repeated material: Andrew decides to restart the explanation, because he messed up or something, but the part the he messed up is still in the video. It would be good if the Wiki that is present in Week 1 could also be present in all other Weeks, so we as students could feel encouraged to write the Wiki of each Week. | really makes you think about the | Content | studied on that lesson. I think | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is great course. The content is very focussed and is apt for professionals who wants a quick peek into the fundamentals but mostly focus on application of the theory. The delivery is awesome. The quizzes, assignments are very helpful. I ended up learning a very deep and complex subject with much ease. Kudos to the professor for making it look so simple. | This is great course. The | Content | is very focussed and is apt | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Didn't have time to finish it, but i'll get it next time! great content. | i'll get it next time! great | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Hi Coursera, Thanks for providing a course like this. I have had experience with a lot of MOOC but nothing can come closer to the simple explanation with technical depth from Andrew Ng. I feel really confident having done this Machine Learning Course. It has become very easy for me to interpret any Machine Learning problem and attempt to solve them. Please convey my deep sense of gratitude to Andrew Ng. Without him the coursera and the accessibility of courses like this would have become impossible for people like me who are from developing country. I have few suggestions regarding Machine Learning Course : 1. If possible can we have a Machine Learning Part 2 course which is more advanced w.r.t content (math oriented), data munging, some more algos and with more focus on industry applications. I have few suggestions in general : 1. Few relevant courses are shown as archived (Eg. Neural Networks) for past few years. Can you unlock them and make them a recurring course like 'Machine Learning'. Thanks, Arun | is more advanced w. r. t | Content | (math oriented), data munging, some more | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Flawless lectures, easy to understand contents and great mentors! I <3 it. | Flawless lectures, easy to understand | Content | and great mentors! I <3 it. | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course! Highly recommended for anyone interested in Machine Learning. Professor NG is clear and articulate and presents the content in an interesting and engaging manner. | clear and articulate and presents the | Content | in an interesting and engaging manner. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | High quality content, learned a lot about ML | High quality | Content | learned a lot about ML | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The instructor is awesome and the contents are very efficient Thank you :) | The instructor is awesome and the | Content | are very efficient Thank you :) | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Brilliant!! the course explains beautifully complex content. | ! the course explains beautifully complex | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The content of the course is very rich and first class, the instructor is great and. The software used is MATLAB or Octave. If you devote a lot of time and effort to this course, you will learn a lot about machine learning and algorithms used. The assignments are the most practical part of this course. | The | Content | of the course is very rich | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very easy to get some idea about machine learning, interesting contents | some idea about machine learning, interesting | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course content. Andrew Ng is a great teacher, and the course structure worked really well for me. | Great course | Content | Andrew Ng is a great teacher, | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This was an extremely well put together course. The lectures content and format were amazing and made complex topics very approachable. I am very happy I took the course. | well put together course. The lectures | Content | and format were amazing and made | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Andrew is excellent at explaining things. Unfortunately the course doesn't go through some of the derivations because it is introductory, but he still offers a reasonable explanation / intuition for most of the content. This is the de-facto standard ML class for beginners and a good intro to coursera and online courses in general. Take this course! | / intuition for most of the | Content | This is the de-facto standard ML | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Awesome instructor and great course overall! Materials are well presented and the programming assignments helped me reinforce the contents from lecture videos! I definitely recommend anyone with even slight curiosity about what machine learning is about take this course from professor Andrew Ng! | programming assignments helped me reinforce the | Content | from lecture videos! I definitely recommend | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A truly fantastic course. Extremely useful, practical, relevant content and examples, plus such a great teacher as well as very helpful course staff and other students. Thanks Andrew, team and the rest of the students. For anyone considering doing the course, note that the time requirements can be a lot - the lectures are fine but two or three of the assignments took far more than 3 hours (if you plan on actually battling through the coding this is relevant. I'd highly recommend that anyone considering doing the course does the assignments since this is where the real magic happens - Andrew quite deviously leaves a bit of the theory to be fully worked out by yourself in the assignments). | fantastic course. Extremely useful, practical, relevant | Content | and examples, plus such a great | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great content, well documented, good exercises and scripts for work submission | Great | Content | well documented, good exercises and scripts | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent lectures and material. Very motivating content with the presentation of real life applications! Thanks. | Excellent lectures and material. Very motivating | Content | with the presentation of real life | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course content was excellent. Only drawback was voice recording quality. | The course | Content | was excellent. Only drawback was voice | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Andrew Ng is such a great teacher. The course content is well structured, that it makes learning very easy. | such a great teacher. The course | Content | is well structured, that it makes | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course with great content that provides practical knowledge and requires true mind work presented in a digestible way - as it is possible. | Great course with great | Content | that provides practical knowledge and requires | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Lectures contents are clearly explained and well organized. Math is clear; equations and symbols are consistent. Programming assignments are well organized and to-the-point; everything you need to know to do the assignments was covered in lectures. Submission process is easy. | Lectures | Content | are clearly explained and well organized. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The content was well presented but perhaps the assignments could be made a bit more challenging. The amount of work required for the programming assignments was a bit on the small side. | The | Content | was well presented but perhaps the | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Bad videos but intense content ! | Bad videos but intense | Content | ! | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It's an amazing course that introduces you to Machine Learning through different techniques. Each week content will be the foundation to the next. | Learning through different techniques. Each week | Content | will be the foundation to the | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course ! Just had to re-pass all my assignments when the certificate became available, because the first time I passed them my identity was not verified. Also, it would be nice to have some kind of "download all the course's content" link at the end of the course, to be able to save the material for later reference. Thank you for this fantastic course ! | of " download all the course's | Content | link at the end of the | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course content is just right with practical exemples and less overwhelming theory. | The course | Content | is just right with practical exemples | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is a great intro course to ML. The content is focused on the techniques used to build basic ML algorithms rather than the tools used to conduct analysis. Andrew Ng choice to use matlab as the programming language is great, so the focus is on understanding the mechanics of ML and not on programming itself. Coming from a Engineering background, I had so much fun watching the lessons and working on the assigments. | great intro course to ML. The | Content | is focused on the techniques used | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Extremely good course to start with machine learning. Clears basic concepts without going into too much detail which makes it ideal for students with no background in calculus. Also, the structure and content is well organized and topics are not rushed upon. You not only learn algorithms but also best practrices to follow to achieve better accuracy. The programming exercises are also really good. All of this makes coupled with the helpful Coursera community to guide you when you are stuck- up with a problem makes it an ideal course to start learning machine learning. | in calculus. Also, the structure and | Content | is well organized and topics are | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Stellar course. The content is great, good pacing, and the teacher is interesting and passionate about the subject. There are a few mistakes in the videos here and there, but nothing major. Definitely a great course that I'd recommand without hesitation to anyone curious about Machine Learning. | Stellar course. The | Content | is great, good pacing, and the | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Lots of great condensed content. I miss a written summary of the videos though. Furthermore, the quality of sound is awful. Well designed quizzes and assignments. Good: In-video quizzes. | Lots of great condensed | Content | I miss a written summary of | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course content is very dense but the questions and exercices help you master the topics as you are progressing. Interesting class. | The course | Content | is very dense but the questions | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course with a professor that puts emphasis on an intuitive understanding of the concepts. Many interesting algorithms are taught and the programming assignments help to get a deeper and very hands-on understanding of each week's content. Thanks to all people involved in creating that course! | very hands-on understanding of each week's | Content | Thanks to all people involved in | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is a very interesting course, with much content for me to start precticing and making my business around IA and Machine Learning, and also with a remarkable Professor, Mr. Andrew Ng. | a very interesting course, with much | Content | for me to start precticing and | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really useful and fantastic course. But the tutor's words are so fast and the course's content is a little hard to understand. Maybe give us more time will be better. | are so fast and the course's | Content | is a little hard to understand. | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Machine learning is the best online module I've taken so far. Professor Ng makes those technical concepts visible us in a very understandable way, and the course assignments are at just right difficulty. I'm quite inspired by the content of machine learning and want to pursue a future career in this area. It would so great if some higher level courses come next, with focus on the application of machine learning algorithms. | difficulty. I'm quite inspired by the | Content | of machine learning and want to | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Absolutely top-quality. Excellent choice of content. Goes into much detail | Absolutely top-quality. Excellent choice of | Content | Goes into much detail | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is simply amazing, all the content from the video lessons, through the quizzes and the programming exercises are really well done, and also, there are really good mentors helping on the Discussion areas. If one with the will to really dive into these complex things to extract knowledge, I assure you, you will. The course is well made, but doesn't mean it's easy. I questioned myself through a lot of times in the beginning if I really was capable of learning all of this stuff. But I didn't give up, and well, this might be one of the most important decisions I've made in my life. This course aroused in me the passion to carry this knowledge, and keep improving it through my career. | course is simply amazing, all the | Content | from the video lessons, through the | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I thought this was an excellent course and only have positive feedback for it. The lecture contents were interesting and well tied to exercise questions and programming assignments. The programming assignments were challenging overall but forced me to really learn the details of each machine learning algorithm. When things got a little too frustrating, such as for the neural network backpropagation assignment, the forums provided ample direction for me to move forward. | positive feedback for it. The lecture | Content | were interesting and well tied to | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I would like to express my gratitude to Mr. Ng for such an excellent course. It helped me to get through such enlightening subject. The instructor was very clear. The contents and other support materials are well organized and satisfying. The programming assignments are suitable even for the ones who have little knowledge on MATLAB/Octave, since it is required only to fulfill the core parts. I hope finding more courses like this on Coursera. | The instructor was very clear. The | Content | and other support materials are well | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Thanks guys! Thoroughly enjoying this course. Excellently structured and content is engaging. Very chuffed. | enjoying this course. Excellently structured and | Content | is engaging. Very chuffed. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Awesome content! | Awesome | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course covers very useful material with clarity. Since it has run for multiple iterations, the content is very polished and it makes participating easy and smooth. | has run for multiple iterations, the | Content | is very polished and it makes | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very simple intro. to techniques that exist in machine learning. The content of each week could be improved by extending to include proofs/derivations and making calculus a pre-req. But this does make the course very accessible, which is a big advantage. | that exist in machine learning. The | Content | of each week could be improved | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A great online course! While taking this facinating course I have found myself discussing the content with several of my friends which is normally not possible when studying such geeky topics. You will get a much better sense of what is possible and what is still not possible, how long it takes to implement, how to do it, etc. This is much more useful as an introduction to machine learning than reading a book. | I have found myself discussing the | Content | with several of my friends which | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is one of the best courses on Coursera! I really learn a lot from Prof Ng. The course content is not hard for beginner, but it doen't mean trival. It covers mOst of the basic knowledges of Machine Learning. I hope Prof Ng can give advanced version of Machine Learning in the future. | lot from Prof Ng. The course | Content | is not hard for beginner, but | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Amazing course! Content is easy to follow. Material that seems daunting on first inspection is dissected and presented in a very intuitive way. The quizzes and especially the Octave/Matlab practice problems are extremely helpful to check your understanding. The scripts are organized very clearly and provides insight on how all the modelling steps should be structured. Mentors for the course are exceptionally helpful. I cannot think of a single criticism. It is hard for me to imagine anyone who is interested in machine learning and is new to the subject walking away disappointed. Thank you Andrew Ng! | Amazing course! | Content | is easy to follow. Material that | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This class is a fantastic introduction to machine learning. The concepts are presented using a clear and concise nomenclature that is easy to understand and provide a foundation to move on to more advance topics as the course progresses. In additional to providing a firm foundation in various machine learning algorithms practical examples are developed using Octave/Matlab. Tutorials are provided along the way and help is readily available if you get stuck on a problem. The course also focuses on best practices which are interwoven in various topics throughout the course making the content relevant and practical for solving real world problems. Kudos to Andrew Ng and Coursea. | topics throughout the course making the | Content | relevant and practical for solving real | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | a. very good coverage of standard algorithmic approaches. b. good suggestive guidelines on specifics of algorithms like issues / details one need to be careful, need not to bother etc.. c. broad coverage of examples.. d. tricky questions...good to experience... Overall I liked this course content and the breadth of coverage. Based on the difficulty i experienced let me place some points of improvements that would help every student.... e. could have dealt some specific examples in full (from definition to implementation) as part of video lecture which would helped better understanding of the problems, algorithms, impact of specifics, implementation issues, analysis methods, inferences that could be derived, final expected solution. f. expecting feedback on exercises.... not only correct or incorrect but reasoning for the responses could be of great help in better understanding.... g. downloadable videos could contain in video quiz... h. Octave content could be increased..... i. audio of the lectures needs fine tuning, hissing sounds could be filtered. For some of the lectures subtitles does not match at all... Thank you very much for coursera.... Thank you very much Prof. Andrew Ng..... Looking forward for mor courses related to ML by you.... | . Overall I liked this course | Content | and the breadth of coverage. Based | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | a. very good coverage of standard algorithmic approaches. b. good suggestive guidelines on specifics of algorithms like issues / details one need to be careful, need not to bother etc.. c. broad coverage of examples.. d. tricky questions...good to experience... Overall I liked this course content and the breadth of coverage. Based on the difficulty i experienced let me place some points of improvements that would help every student.... e. could have dealt some specific examples in full (from definition to implementation) as part of video lecture which would helped better understanding of the problems, algorithms, impact of specifics, implementation issues, analysis methods, inferences that could be derived, final expected solution. f. expecting feedback on exercises.... not only correct or incorrect but reasoning for the responses could be of great help in better understanding.... g. downloadable videos could contain in video quiz... h. Octave content could be increased..... i. audio of the lectures needs fine tuning, hissing sounds could be filtered. For some of the lectures subtitles does not match at all... Thank you very much for coursera.... Thank you very much Prof. Andrew Ng..... Looking forward for mor courses related to ML by you.... | video quiz. . . h. Octave | Content | could be increased. . . . | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Lots of work, very applied and excellent content and teaching. Loved the homework problems! | of work, very applied and excellent | Content | and teaching. Loved the homework problems! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is great fun. The lectures are easy to understand and the exercises are excellent for understanding and thinking through the practical implementations of the contents without having to deal with the implications of loading the data properly and coming up with tests for your functions. | through the practical implementations of the | Content | without having to deal with the | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The content of the course and the way it is explained is wonderful. | The | Content | of the course and the way | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I am week 9 of current course but I already feel so good about the subject. The content covered by Professor and the ease with which he has gone over such complex subjects is beyond commendable. I thoroughly enjoyed the course. I just want Professor Ng to consider another advanced course which covers topics which he hasn't covered in this one, in detail, due to time and audience constraints. Also, there should be an option to get the certificate at the end of the course too, like, in my case, I wasn't sure if I will be able to follow deadlines due to work schedule but now at almost end of it, I feel like I should have opted for it. All in all, thank you so much! | so good about the subject. The | Content | covered by Professor and the ease | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | perfect content and presentation. The professor has an undeniable insight in the subject area. | perfect | Content | and presentation. The professor has an | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very nice course! Andrew explains everything clearly and in enough details for anyone to understand. The content is very informative and gives a good coverage of ML algorithms and their applications as well as many practical pieces of advice of how to tune them or where to look for if something does not work. The coding tasks are also extremely useful as they help you try out in practice what you've just learned and help memorize the material better. Thank you Andrew! | details for anyone to understand. The | Content | is very informative and gives a | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Well-organized and detailed-explained content, user-friendly Matlab code provided. | Well-organized and detailed-explained | Content | user-friendly Matlab code provided. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very interesting content, very well explained. Minor issues: some quizzes or questions appear a little early sometimes regarding the order of the videos though, and subtitles are not always correct. | Very interesting | Content | very well explained. Minor issues: some | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Wonderful course! Sound quality requires revision, but content is supreme. | course! Sound quality requires revision, but | Content | is supreme. | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Brilliant course! Highly recommand for its concise and wonderful content! Btw, Andrew Ng is really a cool professor > < | recommand for its concise and wonderful | Content | Btw, Andrew Ng is really a | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Structured course content. Thanks alot Coursera !! | Structured course | Content | Thanks alot Coursera ! ! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course. Contents, videos, quizzes and programming exercises are very well contrived and conducted. I learnt a lot. | Excellent course. | Content | videos, quizzes and programming exercises are | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent content and excellent teacher. | Excellent | Content | and excellent teacher. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Fantastic teacher, content and coursera intiation. | Fantastic teacher, | Content | and coursera intiation. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | the content is well chosen, easy to understand yet it contains a valuable piece of information | the | Content | is well chosen, easy to understand | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The topic is interesting, the course content is presented clearly, and the lectures are informative. While the assignments can be challenging, they really help to reenforce the lessons. From what I gather, the class was recently moved over from an older Coursera model/design. This is frustratingly apparent at times. Some information can be difficult to find, particularly in the Discussion section. I would love to see this class updated to match the quality of some more recent classes I have taken. | The topic is interesting, the course | Content | is presented clearly, and the lectures | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Best CS Course. The content is practical in industry, the depth of the course is quite appropriate, the intuition is enough for each new materials. | Best CS Course. The | Content | is practical in industry, the depth | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Superb content, brilliantly taught. Cannot ask for more. Many thanks Andrew Ng for bringing us this amazing course and Coursera.org | Superb | Content | brilliantly taught. Cannot ask for more. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Absolutely the best course you can find on the internet! Thanks for a great content :) | the internet! Thanks for a great | Content | :) | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Course content is well organized and explained in simple way. Thank you very much for offering this course. | Course | Content | is well organized and explained in | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Amazing content Amazing teacher Cool interesting assignments Gives the big picture necessary to get going Some more optional videos with more mathematical details would be nice Why octave instead of python? | Amazing | Content | Amazing teacher Cool interesting assignments Gives | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course. Concepts were explained very well and the hands on exercises helped to gain confidence in implementing some of the algorithms. This course is simply magical in transforming a person who is new to machine learning into an expert. I have already started applying machine learning techniques in real life problems. Thanks to Stanford University and Mr. Andrew for providing such high quality content. | Andrew for providing such high quality | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Overall this is a really great course. My small criticism: Sometimes I wished for more optional videos containing proofs of the formulas. I often spent all the time watching the videos wondering how we would solve some problem only to be presented with a formula without any explanation where it came from. This is only a small problem because the answer was usually not too hard to find and often even linked in the discussion, but if this information were contained in the course content (e.g. optional videos assuming some linear algebra background), it would be even better. | information were contained in the course | Content | (e. g. optional videos assuming some | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Awesome instructor, and content. Tough course, but worth the time. | Awesome instructor, and | Content | Tough course, but worth the time. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A great course for revolution in advance machine learning, I am attempting it 2nd time very useful content about Machine Learning and great teaching methodology | attempting it 2nd time very useful | Content | about Machine Learning and great teaching | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Content is just great. Just the right level of challenge for me, also. | | Content | is just great. Just the right | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It is long ago (25+ years) that I dealt with ANNs by that time. This course is terms of content and didactial concept very well built. I can only recommend it. In particular, as it is not only taking care of the theoretical background but also has a lot of good stuff for me as a practitioner. Thanks | time. This course is terms of | Content | and didactial concept very well built. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Interesting classes, awesome instructor, and valuable content!! | Interesting classes, awesome instructor, and valuable | Content | ! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is the best online course I've ever watched without a doubt! ( including many youtube videos, online content in many different formats etc and coursera). It's very well laid out with real-world practical exercise after every lecture! Andrew Ng really did a great job with this course. I recommend this course to everyone interested in ML ! | ( including many youtube videos, online | Content | in many different formats etc and | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Exciting course! Astonishing work to develop all videos and prepared files and guidelines for programming exercices. Andrew Ng make concepts very accessible and very illustrated. The real life exercices immediately give ideas of implementations. We have quickly hands-on thanks to exercices. The diversity of covered fields through the examples taken is quite impressive and useful. I found the difficulty of exercices very subtly tuned to develop really interesting tools thanks to the pre-written codes. These codes also give opportunities to exploit further Octave/Matlab capabilities. I deeply thank the team for granting us access to a such high quality content. | access to a such high quality | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Course content is really good. Assignments are in depth and help you build your concepts. | Course | Content | is really good. Assignments are in | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I really enjoyed the content of this course. Andrew Ng is great at explaining machine learning concepts and gives practical advice along the way. | I really enjoyed the | Content | of this course. Andrew Ng is | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great content! | Great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really like the course. I've learned a lot and the content is pretty interesting. | I've learned a lot and the | Content | is pretty interesting. | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This class is a dope. Well organized, right on the point. with emphasize on the practical side and application and the industry. really well designed homework and tests. really makes you understand and get deep into the content. in fact, it was fun just to solve the homework problems. your brain can breath in fresh thoughts. | understand and get deep into the | Content | in fact, it was fun just | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course is awesome and we need more videos to learn more about the content so clearly. I think lessons about coding in Matlab must be there for the beginners to get familiar with Matlab. | videos to learn more about the | Content | so clearly. I think lessons about | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Brilliant course. Great content and an excellent professor! Thank you. | Brilliant course. Great | Content | and an excellent professor! Thank you. | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The new self-paced version has a lot more content, including very practical cases and recommendations! And the programming assignments are still quite easy, so it makes it a perfect starter course after which you can dive into more technical material. | self-paced version has a lot more | Content | including very practical cases and recommendations! | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Content of the course was great! Sound quality is a bit lower, but you'll get used to it | | Content | of the course was great! Sound | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A fantastic course. The content is informative and clearly outlined by the professor in the excellent set of video lectures. The quizzes and weekly projects are also an excellent learning tool. I greatly enjoyed this course and learned a lot that I will use in my career moving forward. Highly recommended. | A fantastic course. The | Content | is informative and clearly outlined by | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course content is thorough and meticulous. One of the best course I've pursued. | The course | Content | is thorough and meticulous. One of | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course was very informative because there were not only theory lessons but practical assignments with lot of tips. I learnt a lot and hope to use it and learn more in future. Thanks to Prof. Andrew for the wonderful delivery and content. | Andrew for the wonderful delivery and | Content | | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Interesting and practically applicable course content. Really no particular prerequisite - UNIVERSAL. Enjoying doing the course. Great Stuff! | Interesting and practically applicable course | Content | Really no particular prerequisite - UNIVERSAL. | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great teacher Great content Great presentation | Great teacher Great | Content | Great presentation | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | An amazing course of machine learning, having this kind of content for free is just incredible. Thank you Coursera and Andrew Ng. | machine learning, having this kind of | Content | for free is just incredible. Thank | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great Course. The content is explained clearly, with just basic prerequisite knowledge. | Great Course. The | Content | is explained clearly, with just basic | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Beyond my expectation! Such an amazing professor and a great content. This is my first course on machine learning and/or data science and I feel that I am confident to apply it on some small projects. And I am eager to learn more. I am even considering to pursue my masters degree in this area. Thank you Andrew! You are awesome! | an amazing professor and a great | Content | This is my first course on | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | The course if good, but i believe the content should be more didactic. | if good, but i believe the | Content | should be more didactic. | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | Parallel Programming course in Scala will help you to program at a higher level, reason about task and data parallel programs, express common algorithms in a functional style and solve them in parallel, competently microbenchmark parallel code, and write programs that effectively use parallel collections to achieve performance. The course content was well organized and it had in - depth assignments which were relatively difficult for me to complete. I would recommend this course to everyone, and one should take it only after taking the 'Fundamental Programming Principles in Scala' and 'Functional Program Design in Scala' courses. | collections to achieve performance. The course | Content | was well organized and it had | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | I like the course. I learned some nice ideas for parallel computations, not just Scala specific API. To polish: sometime lectures and tasks contain many complicated but not significant details. And some important ideas are not emphasized. I had to filter the content carefully. | emphasized. I had to filter the | Content | carefully. | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | The content of the course is great, will review this course again as i think i left out some concepts. | The | Content | of the course is great, will | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| gw4zh2MfEeWckg7qTYxfmw | Absolutely marvelous course! As a Geographer I must admit the fact that I am extremely passionate about the contents of this course. | I am extremely passionate about the | Content | of this course. | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| gWFmbrP9EeW-cQqGkhsQ8w | I thought the course content was great; it gave me a new perspective on the works of art shown in the course. I also enjoyed the variety of art, styles and mediums used to teach the subject matter. Very interesting. | I thought the course | Content | was great; it gave me a | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| GY2Yx6DxEeSt6SIACzgCKw | The professor teaches by reading the slides and does not even bother to explain the concepts. The course contents might be interesting, but now I'm dropping this course because they are not explaining any concepts but are just giving facts to memorize. | to explain the concepts. The course | Content | might be interesting, but now I'm | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| Gyll8Zh9EeWZyg6bf_Oxkw | Excelent teachers and content | Excelent teachers and | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very good content for beginner, lot of learning in machine learning special caret package in R. | Very good | Content | for beginner, lot of learning in | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Course content feels upside down. You'll learn about machine algorithm specifics and caveats before anyone explains what the said algorithm actually hopes to achieve. | Course | Content | feels upside down. You'll learn about | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Of all the JHU Data Science specialization courses I've had, this was by far the most enjoyable. I really liked how the class was more in the style of 'here's some techniques, now do whatever you want on the project.' Prior courses are, and understandably so, more constrained in the assignments. It's not until here that the student really has the tools to be able to flex their analytical muscles, and it pays off. Also, of the three instructors, I am most favorable to Jeff Leek, who teaches this class. He communicates much clearer than Roger Peng or Brian Caffo. I find I learn more from his content than the others. Lastly, I will say that this class doesn't hold a torch to University of Washington's Machine Learning specialization. That's expected since this is one class and that's a whole series of classes. If you're hungry for more after this one, I highly recommend UWash's Machine Learning specialization. | find I learn more from his | Content | than the others. Lastly, I will | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Had big expectations for this one... really one of the ones to look forward to after working through the beginning of the specialization, but for some reason, it seemed any prof or even TA interaction was absent this time around like in none of the other specialization coursed to date. Bugs in the new interface and quizzes weren't really addressed. Couldn't even get an official response about the apparent removal of Distinction-level now (which I'd been working to get in all specialization courses and now seems no longer an option). Still interesting content. As a "free" course, it's still really valuable. As one of the people that paid for this and all others in this specialization, this is the one I felt didn't return as much value to justify the payment with no "official" course staff seeming to be involved this round. | no longer an option). Still interesting | Content | As a " free" course, it's | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | the lack of assisted practices made it harder to digest the contents and methodologies. strongly suggest to develop some practice problems with explanations. | made it harder to digest the | Content | and methodologies. strongly suggest to develop | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I believe this course is critical and much needed given where the Industry is heading. Prof Leek, has tried his best to explain the concepts in a lucid manner, however the complexity of the content, may challenge most students. A few more examples with R code would have been helpful as translating problem statement to R code may not be intuitive. I would highly recommend that students should plan to study some advance statistics before attempting this course. Having said that, i think this is a wonderful starter course to get a glimpse of what Machine Learning is all about. | manner, however the complexity of the | Content | may challenge most students. A few | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| H3HGeBK4EeS0RyIACp5OCg | Love your style of teaching. The Multiple choice answers in your exams are difficult but necessary to fully understand the topics. Content of the course - 100/100. I would take another course of Prof. Kretschmer instantly. | necessary to fully understand the topics. | Content | of the course - 100/100. I | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| H3HGeBK4EeS0RyIACp5OCg | content was not as interesting as in the first course, but still good overall. Questions were also less analytical challenging as the first course. But I still enjoyed the course as the professor was explaining the subject clearly and the videos were compact and enjoyable. | | Content | was not as interesting as in | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| H3HGeBK4EeS0RyIACp5OCg | it is well put and easy to understand. besides, you can learn it anytime. the content is enlightening and has many new and intestesting topics. i really like it . | you can learn it anytime. the | Content | is enlightening and has many new | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| hbvvfJLaEeWBSw79YYA_8Q | Very good content. The power points are informative and to the point. The mock scenarios are filmed in a manner that is easy to follow and understand. I got a lot out of this. Thanks! | Very good | Content | The power points are informative and | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | I found a number of the lessons were light on content, but I have guilty knowledge having used ArcMap on and off for the past few years. A lot of the meat of this course is replicated in similar or only slightly more detail in the follow-on class in the specialization. If you have experience with GIS or Arc I would strongly recommend skipping this class and moving directly to GIS Data Formats, Design and Quality. | of the lessons were light on | Content | but I have guilty knowledge having | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Excellent content, and the assignments were great as well. Even better is that now as I work through my workflows, I now have these videos to reference if I am having difficulty with anything. Cheers! | Excellent | Content | and the assignments were great as | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Great class. Pace and content excellent. Material immediately useful. Highly recomm | Great class. Pace and | Content | excellent. Material immediately useful. Highly recomm | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | This course stands true to its name. It covers all fundamental concepts of GIS and helps one become familiar with the software used by GIS specialists. The step by step instructions make the course very easy to follow. I was a little intimidated by the course content because long distance learning can be difficult as I do not have a GIS oriented study group of sorts and am now proud of the fact that I challenged myself with the course as it's just great! :) | a little intimidated by the course | Content | because long distance learning can be | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | I'm only done with week 1 of this course 'Fundamentals of GIS' and I divided the work load into two evenings. I'm a full time master student, but this way of learning is really great in combination with full-time work, study etc. Even tho it's rather late right now and I'm tired, I'm really considering to take a few more modules. The structure and the content is so exciting and really drags me into the world of GIS. The lecturer Nick Santos is really good, the pace is perfect and you are always able to go back to previous videos, documents or search the internet, ask your fellow students or the professor if something is bothering you or if you are just curious. I HIGHLY recommend this course and the specialisation aswell. | more modules. The structure and the | Content | is so exciting and really drags | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Although it is not yet over, I would like to rate this course. I think the course structure is very good and the contents are very useful. I like the way it works. As well, I would like to thank the instructor, Mr. Nick Santos and all the team, since the explanations are great (besides, as a non-native English speaker, I could understand everything without any problem). | structure is very good and the | Content | are very useful. I like the | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Great content | Great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| HFhDw-STEeWYOBIRup69HQ | Consider adding a programming assignment to the course curriculum. Please address content issues in a timely manner. Thank you. | to the course curriculum. Please address | Content | issues in a timely manner. Thank | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| HFhDw-STEeWYOBIRup69HQ | Coming out from two very good predecessors (C3, parts 1&2), this course is somewhat a disappointment. The contents are too broad without real focused depth, and too much time spent on background info in almost all lectures. There ought to be more hands-on practices, and the assessments should be more challenging towards understanding, rather than matching terms. | course is somewhat a disappointment. The | Content | are too broad without real focused | Negative | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | The Good: Very palatable content and provides information at a very slow pace for ease of learning.More reasonable content and far more worthwhile than the first Arduino course of the series. The Bad: Not worth the money when looked at generally. The first and second course could easily have been merged. A lack of introduction to electronic circuits also hinders full use of what is being taught. | The Good: Very palatable | Content | and provides information at a very | Positive | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | The Good: Very palatable content and provides information at a very slow pace for ease of learning.More reasonable content and far more worthwhile than the first Arduino course of the series. The Bad: Not worth the money when looked at generally. The first and second course could easily have been merged. A lack of introduction to electronic circuits also hinders full use of what is being taught. | for ease of learning. More reasonable | Content | and far more worthwhile than the | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | Absolutely loved this course. Despite a very seemingly 'casual' method of instruction, the content surely keeps the student on their toes. There is just oodles of stuff to learn in this Course! You'll leave enlightened in the Arduino Space! Great course, I recommend it to everyone who wants to learn how the shields work, internet connectivity with Arduino and even basics of Arduino. | seemingly 'casual' method of instruction, the | Content | surely keeps the student on their | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | The teacher is didactic and the material is good. But the course content is too superficial. Because of that, it is really easy to complete it in only one week or in a weekend. The second course: "The Arduino Platform and C Programming" and this one could be merged into one. | material is good. But the course | Content | is too superficial. Because of that, | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | Course contents are fine. Unfortunately the absence of a course board where students can discuss and eventually receive help from the teacher has an bad influence on the course overall rating | Course | Content | are fine. Unfortunately the absence of | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| hHc_5i-9EeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Good content and real examples, all the tools an entrepreneur needs to achieve its goals. COMPLETE | Good | Content | and real examples, all the tools | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Excellent Course. Great instructors, very well structured content. I loved the last assignment, had a lot of fun building my own webpage. Brilliant learning experience, will definitely keep practising. | Course. Great instructors, very well structured | Content | I loved the last assignment, had | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Content and pace are appropriate for beginners, and provide a high level overview of the technologies involved in Frontend web design with modern technologies. | | Content | and pace are appropriate for beginners, | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Great content so far. | Great | Content | so far. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Well presented content. It was a little bit weird for me to jump straight to jQuery and spending so little time on Javascript but it works out for the course. I would suggest a couple of more examples and explanation of general programming concepts with providing relevant pdf. Generally a very good and content-rich course. | Well presented | Content | It was a little bit weird | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Words... TOO MANY Words!! Talking talking talking, most if it without valuable content. I got bored listening to the instructors continuously telling us what they were going to tell us, repeating themselves, and then telling us what they told us again and again and again... Also WAY too many UMMMMsss from the instructors. | talking, most if it without valuable | Content | I got bored listening to the | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Bright instructors delivering succinct and interesting content, with quick-paced videos and quizzes make a great learning experience. I am really impressed! Thank you, University of London people! | Bright instructors delivering succinct and interesting | Content | with quick-paced videos and quizzes make | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Course content is way too easy and inadequate to do any useful work. | Course | Content | is way too easy and inadequate | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Needs way bigger scope and a bit more going into details. The Full Stack Web Development course is somewhat like that. Lectures are good and easy to understand, both visuals and speak are nice and clear. Hopefully next one remains great quality but with more content :) | remains great quality but with more | Content | :) | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | I really like it!!! From easiest to hardest content, I´ve learn three programatio languages priciples | ! ! From easiest to hardest | Content | I´ve learn three programatio languages priciples | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Great content, simple , easy to understand! | Great | Content | simple , easy to understand! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The content was simple and well organized out for a good introductory course. The first step is often the most difficult one to take, so it's nice that they kept it easy. | The | Content | was simple and well organized out | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | I'm finding this course tremendously helpful in getting up to speed on responsive web design. The content is structured to be digestible and doesn't overwhelm. The videos are engaging enough to watch all the way through. | speed on responsive web design. The | Content | is structured to be digestible and | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Presenters are awesome! Content is profound! | Presenters are awesome! | Content | is profound! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The course covered quite a decent amount of content, but personally I think it was a bit fast for a beginner. | covered quite a decent amount of | Content | but personally I think it was | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Excellent content and delivery style | Excellent | Content | and delivery style | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | It's a awesome course! I'm enjoying a lot the explanation of the teatchers and the content is really usefull and intersting! | explanation of the teatchers and the | Content | is really usefull and intersting! | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | HTML and CSS were stellar explanations. Matt really has a knack for adding humour to his lecture that kept me engaged and helped me understand as well. Cheers. The JS portion though was rough. I felt like Marko has an incredible amount of knowledge but the method of the lecturers, content, and layout was hard to grasp on a first-time go. I had to re-watch every lecturer in the JS and I still am having problems...It's obviously a difficult language though and I'm honestly not sure if there actually IS an easier way to teach it. Marko's enthusiasm really showed though, so it helped keep me coming back for more punishment~ Great job all around to everyone! Really good beginner course. | but the method of the lecturers, | Content | and layout was hard to grasp | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Great course! But the pace and content can be improved on. Issuing of lecture slides in pdf would definitely help too. | Great course! But the pace and | Content | can be improved on. Issuing of | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Nice job of simplifying the content. Simple and clear examples provided removing all the code that is unrelated to the topic at hand! Well worth taking for those new and for those wanting to get a refresher on the topic. | Nice job of simplifying the | Content | Simple and clear examples provided removing | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Use this course to reinforce your front end skills and not to learn for the first time. There's too many gaps in the presented content for a beginner. The video and audio were presented in a professional high quality format that you would expect from a major university. However, the course structure was slightly unorganized and didn't flow as well as other courses of similar content. Sometimes the instructors seemed to be at a loss for words and stumbled along with arms flailing. At 2X speed it's very obvious and entertaining. It was a fair attempt for their first online Coursera Web Development course. Hopefully, University of London will improve with future courses. | too many gaps in the presented | Content | for a beginner. The video and | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Use this course to reinforce your front end skills and not to learn for the first time. There's too many gaps in the presented content for a beginner. The video and audio were presented in a professional high quality format that you would expect from a major university. However, the course structure was slightly unorganized and didn't flow as well as other courses of similar content. Sometimes the instructors seemed to be at a loss for words and stumbled along with arms flailing. At 2X speed it's very obvious and entertaining. It was a fair attempt for their first online Coursera Web Development course. Hopefully, University of London will improve with future courses. | well as other courses of similar | Content | Sometimes the instructors seemed to be | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | This course have excellent title but not that great contents. It touched html, css, javascript, bootstrap and jquery most of part as just touched. contents are too less | excellent title but not that great | Content | It touched html, css, javascript, bootstrap | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | This course have excellent title but not that great contents. It touched html, css, javascript, bootstrap and jquery most of part as just touched. contents are too less | most of part as just touched. | Content | are too less | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | This course is very good. Well organized, a lot of stuff to learn, great contents. | lot of stuff to learn, great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | I have followed 2 courses at the same time: this one and "HTML, CSS and Javascript". They are covering the similar topics but this class has fallen short on most of the subject. Lecture time is very little. Short videos, and few of them. Each video is mostly non-focused talking, very few examples and so you don't learn much. By comparison, the other class has a lot of videos, each video is much longer and goes into many examples. Time is spent on focusing on the things to learn, and you get a lot out of it. I am dropping out of this specialization and will follow the other one which I hope will bring good content (unfortunately the following classes are not from the same teacher but from the same university). The following classes from this specialization are from the same teacher, so I don't think things will improve much. | which I hope will bring good | Content | (unfortunately the following classes are not | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Got really bonkers listening to the University of London jingle at the start AND end of each of the 38 video's in this course. The content is just ok.. but not explanation is very high level. It is good for someone who has never had experience with web technologies before. | 38 video's in this course. The | Content | is just ok. . but not | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Straightforward, quality content. | Straightforward, quality | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| HIUPOchIEeSA1yIACye2oA | WELL IT IS AN AMAZING COURSE, I AM PSYCHOLOGIST SO I WILL TRY TO TRANSLATE THE COURSE CONTENT TO MY AREA, ALSO I WILL USE IT WITH MY 12 OLD TEARS DAUGHTER TO TEACH HER ART. | WILL TRY TO TRANSLATE THE COURSE | Content | TO MY AREA, ALSO I WILL | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| HIUPOchIEeSA1yIACye2oA | The course is very well organized and the contents are well explained. | is very well organized and the | Content | are well explained. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| HIUPOchIEeSA1yIACye2oA | It was great. I loved the fact I could watch the videos and follow the steps at my own pace. The content was really good: objective, clear and the texts were both supportive of the subject presented and open to other approaches. I recommend it to everyone interested in deepen her/his relations with the theme. | steps at my own pace. The | Content | was really good: objective, clear and | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| HIUPOchIEeSA1yIACye2oA | Really excellent activities and explanations and examples. I loved so much about it. The content was excellent, the time with students was excellent... Really great! This makes me want to visit New York! | loved so much about it. The | Content | was excellent, the time with students | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| HIUPOchIEeSA1yIACye2oA | The teachers there do not do what they teach: they rattle down their text as fast as they can speak and do not emphasize the content with movement or even change of expression. I was disappointed. | speak and do not emphasize the | Content | with movement or even change of | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| hJ1Jl-fcEeWwMw6osrJBVw | Actually, this course is a great one to take. Professors have explained these concepts and main ideas very clearly, therefore students can understand it very easily, even if they do not have previous knowledge about game theory. I want to say “thank you” to all the three professors for making such a concise and intelligible course. However, I would like to give some suggestions about this course. There is an obvious gap between the quizzes and graded assignments. Sometimes the quiz is very easy and it just requires you to have a basic understanding of the concept, while the assignment is even more difficult than the examples included in the videos. I think this course would be better if the staff can improve the difficulty gap between quizzes and assignments. And for people who want to enroll this course, an exercise book with detailed solution would be helpful for you to learn it better. As for the content of this course, there are lots of formulas from Week 5 to the end, which are a little difficult to understand. I fully understand this because math is always abstract, and formulation is an essential part of it. I think this problem can be solved by providing more ungraded quizzes for students to practice. They can have a better comprehension of the content through practicing. Anyway, this course is worth taking. Through learning it you will gain not only the knowledge about game theory, but also a new way to understand relationships around you. Happy learning! | learn it better. As for the | Content | of this course, there are lots | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| hJ1Jl-fcEeWwMw6osrJBVw | Actually, this course is a great one to take. Professors have explained these concepts and main ideas very clearly, therefore students can understand it very easily, even if they do not have previous knowledge about game theory. I want to say “thank you” to all the three professors for making such a concise and intelligible course. However, I would like to give some suggestions about this course. There is an obvious gap between the quizzes and graded assignments. Sometimes the quiz is very easy and it just requires you to have a basic understanding of the concept, while the assignment is even more difficult than the examples included in the videos. I think this course would be better if the staff can improve the difficulty gap between quizzes and assignments. And for people who want to enroll this course, an exercise book with detailed solution would be helpful for you to learn it better. As for the content of this course, there are lots of formulas from Week 5 to the end, which are a little difficult to understand. I fully understand this because math is always abstract, and formulation is an essential part of it. I think this problem can be solved by providing more ungraded quizzes for students to practice. They can have a better comprehension of the content through practicing. Anyway, this course is worth taking. Through learning it you will gain not only the knowledge about game theory, but also a new way to understand relationships around you. Happy learning! | have a better comprehension of the | Content | through practicing. Anyway, this course is | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| hJ1Jl-fcEeWwMw6osrJBVw | The topic and the class content itself are good, but the introduction is too brief. Hope they can add more stuff! | The topic and the class | Content | itself are good, but the introduction | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| hJ1Jl-fcEeWwMw6osrJBVw | Interesting course content | Interesting course | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| hmUA37FKEeS5liIACye34Q | Great content! Mixing lectures, articles and videos gave several perspective on the topics and made the content more interesting. Peer reviews of papers varied drastically based on the reviewer so may not be the best way for grading. | Great | Content | Mixing lectures, articles and videos gave | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| hmUA37FKEeS5liIACye34Q | Great content! Mixing lectures, articles and videos gave several perspective on the topics and made the content more interesting. Peer reviews of papers varied drastically based on the reviewer so may not be the best way for grading. | on the topics and made the | Content | more interesting. Peer reviews of papers | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| Hr9lByyfEeWccAqzeA4VPw | Excellent introduction of this programme. As Australian student and professional practitioner I really admire the contents and research behind this programme. Thank you. Regards | professional practitioner I really admire the | Content | and research behind this programme. Thank | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | An outstanding course with extraordinary intuition behind to make clear basic calculus. Many thanks for the content and especially for the creativity and motivation of the lecturer to deliver the lessons. | basic calculus. Many thanks for the | Content | and especially for the creativity and | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | awesome course！The professor is very funny so that i can pay more attention to the content. | can pay more attention to the | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | you must use the exact format to get the correct answer on problems, or it will be marked wrong the course is "as is" meaning when there are mistakes in the coursework neither web hosting nor faculty have are available to correct mistakes moderators are not allowed to correct course content, so what they end up doing is editing your post in the forum. get use to this: "A moderator deleted your post in Calculus One because of spam" "Review our forum Code of Conduct to learn more about guidelines for participating in course discussions", but i and others are only posting problem areas, thus rendering the forum discussions useless since the moderators only have the power to delete and edit your post, there is a list of content errors for the course that you will need to look at. real smart. i asked to have my grade adjusted, but they deleted that post also | are not allowed to correct course | Content | so what they end up doing | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | you must use the exact format to get the correct answer on problems, or it will be marked wrong the course is "as is" meaning when there are mistakes in the coursework neither web hosting nor faculty have are available to correct mistakes moderators are not allowed to correct course content, so what they end up doing is editing your post in the forum. get use to this: "A moderator deleted your post in Calculus One because of spam" "Review our forum Code of Conduct to learn more about guidelines for participating in course discussions", but i and others are only posting problem areas, thus rendering the forum discussions useless since the moderators only have the power to delete and edit your post, there is a list of content errors for the course that you will need to look at. real smart. i asked to have my grade adjusted, but they deleted that post also | post, there is a list of | Content | errors for the course that you | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | A very good course because of its content and its professor. Thank you for your help. | very good course because of its | Content | and its professor. Thank you for | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Course seems fundamentally sound. Prof is enthusiatic and obvioulsy highly qualified. Really appreciate the proofs he provides such as the geometric development of the trig derivatives, the chain rule, and the fundamental theorem. I'd give it 5 stars for content and clarity. I am disappointed that some of the lectures were out of sequence with the quizzes and I really found that entering the answers to quizz questions was difficult. In some cases the tool misled me i.e. when the question indicated E should be entered for Euler's constant but the grading tool required e. Also in one instance the grading tool didn't recognize the right answer and I believe the correct answer wasn't even available as one of the choices. | I'd give it 5 stars for | Content | and clarity. I am disappointed that | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Great teacher with a very interesting content and approach. To totally benefit from this course, going through the associated Mooculus print is really complementary to the video. This enthusiastic mathematician, beyond the raw mathematics, will give you insights, practical and inspired examples or applications, interests, and much more. You might end up seeing integral calculus as an epic rpg battle versus an ogre after this course (special thanks to the professor for this amazing image ), but you would have been well trained, fully equipped, and wisely guided. | Great teacher with a very interesting | Content | and approach. To totally benefit from | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | The content of this course is fantastic, if you read the textbook with it. It would be 5 stars, but there are a number of glitches in the quizzes and exams. Information about the textbook and quiz issues can be found in the first post on the discussion board. | The | Content | of this course is fantastic, if | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Great Teachers, great content | Great Teachers, great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | The content is good. Needs better maintenance. Certain bugs and assignment errors should be rectified. | The | Content | is good. Needs better maintenance. Certain | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Great course content. Great professor. What more could you ask for? | Great course | Content | Great professor. What more could you | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Some of the contents just seem overly complex, especially the videos. If they would do a few problems similar to those in the quizzes, it would be much more better. | Some of the | Content | just seem overly complex, especially the | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Not only the contents but also how it is presented. Jim Fowler, PhD, presents the content of this course with so much enthousiasm. A very nice example of how teaching calculus, mathematics or any course/module at any educational institution should be done. | Not only the | Content | but also how it is presented. | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Not only the contents but also how it is presented. Jim Fowler, PhD, presents the content of this course with so much enthousiasm. A very nice example of how teaching calculus, mathematics or any course/module at any educational institution should be done. | presented. Jim Fowler, PhD, presents the | Content | of this course with so much | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Very clear explanations. Funny content. And the most important:Challenging! | Very clear explanations. Funny | Content | And the most important:Challenging! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | The professor is very motivated, teaches very well, uses different (including visual) ways to explain the content. The course is very detailed, but does not goes fast. So this is easy to get it done. | (including visual) ways to explain the | Content | The course is very detailed, but | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Great content, thanks. | Great | Content | thanks. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Very interesting content- going to be useful in my career | Very interesting | Content | going to be useful in my | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Course feels somewhat abandoned by instructors. Content is okay, but can't help the feeling that it's basically a cash cow - students would benefit a lot if instructors were move involved. | Course feels somewhat abandoned by instructors. | Content | is okay, but can't help the | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Pretty good course. Nice content. Middle section on clustering felt random. | Pretty good course. Nice | Content | Middle section on clustering felt random. | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | The course content applies to R. The teachers focused on the programming language rather than the application of the existing graphs to explore data. | The course | Content | applies to R. The teachers focused | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| HXsj6jeHEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Great content, valuable insights. Thanks! | Great | Content | valuable insights. Thanks! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| HXsj6jeHEeWJaxK5AT4frw | While I enjoyed most of the content of this course, I felt that it was one long advertisement for Duetto. I will certainly continue the course series because I enjoy the learning. Also, a note for presenters, please be aware of how distracting so many hand gestures can be. Thanks! | While I enjoyed most of the | Content | of this course, I felt that | Positive | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| HXsj6jeHEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Up-date content and well expalined concepts . Added value as reading and links . It really engagement me to going on for the next. | Up-date | Content | and well expalined concepts . Added | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| i7N8t4khEeW99gozy_2pgw | Excellent course with very useful contents. Professor gives excellent examples | Excellent course with very useful | Content | Professor gives excellent examples | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Excellent course. Understood the basic principles of the design. Keep practicing makes you better and better. Very well organized with the information of the content and course structure. | organized with the information of the | Content | and course structure. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Great content, presented in a clear and direct manner and then applied with assignments that are accessible to all skill levels. Highly recommend. | Great | Content | presented in a clear and direct | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | I really liked the course, the content and flow of information not being too saturated, helps students to not lose interest on the course. | I really liked the course, the | Content | and flow of information not being | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Great course! This is the first course I've taken through Coursera and I am so impressed, both with the content and the delivery. It really influenced the way I look at design. I am really looking forward to completing this specialization. | am so impressed, both with the | Content | and the delivery. It really influenced | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Really nice introduction to fundamentals, very punctual, brief but juicy in content. So glad that I've found this Coursera. | very punctual, brief but juicy in | Content | So glad that I've found this | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Clear teaching line and complete content makes it a wonderful choice for starters who are interested in graphic design. However, as the name of the course indicates, it is not an advanced tutorial for those who wants to enhance their design skills in a more specific area. | Clear teaching line and complete | Content | makes it a wonderful choice for | Positive | 0.9 | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | What a great course! The content was prescient to the artwork I do and the assignments fun and applicable. I look forward to taking the next course in the sequence. | What a great course! The | Content | was prescient to the artwork I | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Good content, it explains with so much clear and simplycity! Really love the course! | Good | Content | it explains with so much clear | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | I really enjoyed this course. The teacher made the content very approachable and doable. The goal was to just create and start designing. I loved how low pressure it felt! It actually made me want to go the extra mile and design more! | this course. The teacher made the | Content | very approachable and doable. The goal | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good and educational contents. Great practical exercises that help develop knowledge. | Very good and educational | Content | Great practical exercises that help develop | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | The course was very cool. If you have already studied anything design-related, the content might be too basic and might look boarded in a rather shallow way. However, if you are new to the topic, I think the course is the perfect introduction to how the design process works and also, to the specialization (if you are interested in that). Additionally, the assignments offer a great chance to practice every concept reviewed in the videos, so that even a person who knows those things, but is a little rusty on the whole practice side, might benefit from the course. | have already studied anything design-related, the | Content | might be too basic and might | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | I was satisfied by the content and the pace of learning. | I was satisfied by the | Content | and the pace of learning. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Great course! Amazing teachers and good content! | Great course! Amazing teachers and good | Content | | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Comprehensive and useful content | Comprehensive and useful | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Excellent course, videos are short and effective , the activities and content were also great . I would love more courses about desing like this one in Coursera | and effective , the activities and | Content | were also great . I would | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very practical and enjoyable introduction to graphic design. It condenses a lot of content in an approachable and diversified way so it's useful to learn a lot in little time. It's also encouraging to put all the concepts taught into practice with various media, with its balance between technique and talent. I like the instructor's way to express the importance of relying on the idea over difficulty. Among the MOOCs I've taken on art topics, this one stands out as one of the most clarifying and fulfilling. | design. It condenses a lot of | Content | in an approachable and diversified way | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Good useful fundamental course content | Good useful fundamental course | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Videos explain very well all the contents. | Videos explain very well all the | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| IEE-83HuEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | That's terrible! I can't see any English subtitles added to this course. Besides, tests are not relevant to the content taught in the video. | tests are not relevant to the | Content | taught in the video. | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| IfDtq1vFEeSKTyIAC0YL2w | I think it is a very good course about Bioinformatics. The lab content is especially useful to me, | good course about Bioinformatics. The lab | Content | is especially useful to me, | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | I like this course because of its content. It is an awesome experience. A must do course. | like this course because of its | Content | It is an awesome experience. A | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Great course and a great teacher. The assignments were great and really prompted you to learn. I liked how they weren't too easy and at the same time they weren't insanely difficult. Any effort that you put in learning the course was payed off. Hopefully the other courses in the specialization will be similar. And of course, the content of the course was very interesting and informative. Looking forward to the future courses. | be similar. And of course, the | Content | of the course was very interesting | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Course content is really awesome. Homework assignment will help a lot to learn more about the course content. | Course | Content | is really awesome. Homework assignment will | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Course content is really awesome. Homework assignment will help a lot to learn more about the course content. | to learn more about the course | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Ijr8rurHEeSb-yIACwuKNg | I thank the organizers for this well-structured Chemistry course. I was sometimes overwhelmed by the amount of information given but I guess this is due to the condensation process that had to be carried out in order to impart the contents in 11 weeks. Otherwise I would have appreciated to have more exercises resolved during the lessons and to get a sheet with all the formula used during the course...Thank you again. | out in order to impart the | Content | in 11 weeks. Otherwise I would | Negative | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Ijr8rurHEeSb-yIACwuKNg | really helpful advice, completed content with acceptable depth | really helpful advice, completed | Content | with acceptable depth | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| iN8yoSWdEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | I like the content and enjoyed the process but as this is online course, it should be better designed. The criteria for reviews and assignment direction is probably not too explicit that cause a lot of confusion, and people are submitting very different assignments from one another. It is not easy to grade and hard to understand what is expected. Also it is recommended that you know Adobe Illustrator or InDesign. I actually had to take additional course alongside of this course because although it was not mandatory, it was better to know how to use these software. | I like the | Content | and enjoyed the process but as | Positive | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| iN8yoSWdEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | The course content was good but the assignments weren't structured that well. While reviewing I realised some people made very simplistic stuff like me after following instructions, while others with more design experience created really amazing stuff. They should have included some advanced example for demo. | The course | Content | was good but the assignments weren't | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| iN8yoSWdEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | This course gave a great opportunity to explore one's creativity, with assignments that didn't require us to have skills in particular types of graphic expression. However, I also found that it didn't give me the richness of principles and techniques that I've found in other courses in this sequence. I expect that, for an in-person course, this instructor gives individualized feedback that provides that content. In a peer review situation, the feedback is quite general and so doesn't take up the slack from the lectures. I suggest that Coursera work with the instructor to retain the current content, but produce much richer lectures that have concepts and principles which students can put into practice even after the course ends. | gives individualized feedback that provides that | Content | In a peer review situation, the | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| iN8yoSWdEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | This course gave a great opportunity to explore one's creativity, with assignments that didn't require us to have skills in particular types of graphic expression. However, I also found that it didn't give me the richness of principles and techniques that I've found in other courses in this sequence. I expect that, for an in-person course, this instructor gives individualized feedback that provides that content. In a peer review situation, the feedback is quite general and so doesn't take up the slack from the lectures. I suggest that Coursera work with the instructor to retain the current content, but produce much richer lectures that have concepts and principles which students can put into practice even after the course ends. | the instructor to retain the current | Content | but produce much richer lectures that | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | This course is wonderful and very informative for complete beginners with nutrition and cooking. The teacher is knowledgeable of her subject and creates clear content that lends to a good learning experience. I would recommend this course to anyone who is not familiar with nutrition and who has no experience cooking. | of her subject and creates clear | Content | that lends to a good learning | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | I really liked this course. It has given me a renewed appreciation for home cooking. My favorite part was the hand drawings for the main content videos. I also liked all the cooking demonstrations. I plan on trying them real soon In the future, I'm hoping for more content and the opportunity to earn a certificate. I'd like to see a section specific nutritional targets for certain age groups. Menu planning would also be welcome. | the hand drawings for the main | Content | videos. I also liked all the | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | I really liked this course. It has given me a renewed appreciation for home cooking. My favorite part was the hand drawings for the main content videos. I also liked all the cooking demonstrations. I plan on trying them real soon In the future, I'm hoping for more content and the opportunity to earn a certificate. I'd like to see a section specific nutritional targets for certain age groups. Menu planning would also be welcome. | the future, I'm hoping for more | Content | and the opportunity to earn a | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | I could learn more deeply and apply them in daily life. Every time I choose my diet, I remember contents of this lecture. Thank you for making such a good lecture and I hope to apply it again. | I choose my diet, I remember | Content | of this lecture. Thank you for | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Exceptional Content! If you have children - this is a must! Well done. | Exceptional | Content | If you have children - this | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Child Nutrition and Cooking is good educational for those parents need to learn and more widen knowledge in the health of their kids. This content is the best that can recommend in all parents. | the health of their kids. This | Content | is the best that can recommend | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | dunno wwhat's the point of making two separate courses with different names.. the content are fundamentally the same. | courses with different names. . the | Content | are fundamentally the same. | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Easy to follow, and good contents | Easy to follow, and good | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | nice content and videos, good examples. For people in the basic is real good. | nice | Content | and videos, good examples. For people | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | We don't have children, but I really enjoyed taking this online course on child nutrition and cooking offered by Stanford. Dr. Maya Adam did a very good job with the lecture videos, course content, etc. I just signed up for the Introduction to Food and Health course presented on-demand. You should join me on the journey. | job with the lecture videos, course | Content | etc. I just signed up for | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Very good content and best described | Very good | Content | and best described | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | I am really disappointed with the content of this course. If what you're looking for is the most basic of information on making better choices and remembering to wash your cutting board after handling raw meat, maybe this course is for you. If, however, you come to this course wanting specific information about how to build great meals for babies, toddlers, and young children, or you'd like to know how their needs change over time, this course is not for you. I was hoping for information like how to teach your toddler to chew/eat difficult things (ex: whole apples). I wanted to know at what age/weight you switch to 2% milk. I wanted to know how many calories a meal should be based on height and weight and how that changes over time. I wanted to know medically verified tips on getting the right amount of each nutrient into a toddler's diet and what, if any, extra vitamins should be added. I wanted tips on weaning if you're still nursing a toddler... I guess I just wanted more. In addition, the quizzes are so easy as to be silly. Actual quiz question and correct answer: Which is NOT a good way to approach grocery shopping if healthy choices are desired? Answer: Visit the supermarket hungry and walk through the candy aisle first. COME ON! Did I need a Stanford University course to tell me that one?!?!? While the instructor is knowledgeable, this course is geared toward someone with NO knowledge, not someone who wants to gain a deeper understanding. The videos are painfully slow (am I waiting for a doodle here???) and I could read the entire course worth of transcripts in under a half hour rather than go through all of the videos. And the recipes... good god! I don't think that someone interested in learning more about child nutrition is needing a slow tutorial on how to make basic oatmeal on the stove top. If she'd upped the game- showed basics and then talked about the benefits of adding, say, chia seeds, different fruits, flax, etc. and how best to make a basic bowl of oatmeal into a complete breakfast, that would have been a useful topic. I'm just hugely disappointed. This course is best suited to perhaps a health department; not to someone seeking college level information about a topic that matters to their children's lives. | I am really disappointed with the | Content | of this course. If what you're | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | thanks very much for a very useful course! I am a mom-to-be, this course brings me a basic concept of food content and how to raise a healthy child. | me a basic concept of food | Content | and how to raise a healthy | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Easy, simple and clear. Does not need extra learning time so you can do it even with a busy schedule. I think everybody should be aware and take in consideration eating aspects. Was totally happy with the course content. | Was totally happy with the course | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | This course helped me understand more about the science behind foods. A lot of the content I already knew but it was nice to have a refresher. A lot of the recipes were great ideas (I have already made most of them before being introduced to this course). The videos that involved making the meals were a bit "dumbed down" for people who are not used to cooking but I like the cheerful attitude of everybody who came on screen. | behind foods. A lot of the | Content | I already knew but it was | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Course content is balanced with demonstrations and charts, along with quizzes. Enjoyed it. | Course | Content | is balanced with demonstrations and charts, | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Very useful nutritional and food information structured with care, combined with common sense advice to apply in every household. The whole package is served with delicate ambient music, practical recipes and kitchen advices, and last but not least, with love towards children and family. One might find inside some controversial aspects as maybe too much frying, cooking in aluminium foil presumed to be bad, using sugar when cooking, but everyone is free to adapt the content to his own perceptions, fears and style. The main philosophy proposed, the moderation, is a keeper though. I just loved taking this course | everyone is free to adapt the | Content | to his own perceptions, fears and | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | I enjoyed taking this course. I have learned several *new* things about buying, preparing and cooking food. The videos are straight-forward and the content is presented in a clear and concise way. | The videos are straight-forward and the | Content | is presented in a clear and | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | A long-time practitioner and a loving mother provides science-based learning about child nutrition. The content was very interactive and accessible. She not only conducts research in this area but also applies it to her daily life. | science-based learning about child nutrition. The | Content | was very interactive and accessible. She | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Gave me a better understanding about how food works and the different influences on human health. Really easy to understand content as well. | human health. Really easy to understand | Content | as well. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Good and clear content. A bit from an American point of view... I missed some in depth explanation (like the class of the nerv-system or the Glycemic index). Overall easy to watch and good lessons. | Good and clear | Content | A bit from an American point | Positive | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | The course is very helpful not only for Child Nutrition, but Personal Nutrition as well. The course content was very interesting and easy to follow. | Personal Nutrition as well. The course | Content | was very interesting and easy to | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Excellent course. The material presented was not difficult to comprehend. I highly recommend this to parents who are in a quandry every night when the question, "what's for dinner?" presents itself. More than the content, I was most impressed by the manner in which the course was taught. Instead of a "talking head" format, the instructor used a variety of techniques to present the material, including teaching the majority of the class from her kitchen, using an interactive "blackboard" to illustrate concepts while she spoke and lots of cooking demonstrations. Kudos to Stanford for producing such high quality content. I have started a lot of Coursera courses and this is the first one that I've been able to complete because the content kept me engaged. | " presents itself. More than the | Content | I was most impressed by the | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Excellent course. The material presented was not difficult to comprehend. I highly recommend this to parents who are in a quandry every night when the question, "what's for dinner?" presents itself. More than the content, I was most impressed by the manner in which the course was taught. Instead of a "talking head" format, the instructor used a variety of techniques to present the material, including teaching the majority of the class from her kitchen, using an interactive "blackboard" to illustrate concepts while she spoke and lots of cooking demonstrations. Kudos to Stanford for producing such high quality content. I have started a lot of Coursera courses and this is the first one that I've been able to complete because the content kept me engaged. | Stanford for producing such high quality | Content | I have started a lot of | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Excellent course. The material presented was not difficult to comprehend. I highly recommend this to parents who are in a quandry every night when the question, "what's for dinner?" presents itself. More than the content, I was most impressed by the manner in which the course was taught. Instead of a "talking head" format, the instructor used a variety of techniques to present the material, including teaching the majority of the class from her kitchen, using an interactive "blackboard" to illustrate concepts while she spoke and lots of cooking demonstrations. Kudos to Stanford for producing such high quality content. I have started a lot of Coursera courses and this is the first one that I've been able to complete because the content kept me engaged. | been able to complete because the | Content | kept me engaged. | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Lovely structure of the class combined with illustration, interview and cooking is the best part of this class. The contents are very helpful as well! I really recommend this class whoever wants to know about nutrition and change your diet habit to healthy way. | best part of this class. The | Content | are very helpful as well! I | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Great course!. Content was clear and precise. I would have loved to learn more recipes for kids. | Great course! . | Content | was clear and precise. I would | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Nicely organised and content rich course; helps to know a lot about child nutrition. | Nicely organised and | Content | rich course; helps to know a | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | This course is great!! And fun too... I learn many thing that I've overlooked for these years, just like nutrition label and soon. This course tell me the basic knowledge of healthy meal and the importance of making my own meal. Unfortunately, this course is pretty much short like the other...It'll be SUPER if the content of the course could be extended a lil' bit (or a lot more is better though :p) | . It'll be SUPER if the | Content | of the course could be extended | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Excellent!!! Marvelous content! | Excellent! ! ! Marvelous | Content | | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Very useful knowledge enhance my working task. The content is delivered well with suitable material. Great experiences for me to develop myself | knowledge enhance my working task. The | Content | is delivered well with suitable material. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | The course is well prepared, thought through, coherent and structured in a way that it supports the content. However, it felt very much like being in an advertisement program for PMBOK. This feeling was supported by the unavailability of all course materials. Throughout the course the PMBOK guide was included as the suggested reading. The PMBOK materials were featured in each and every lecture and the guidebook was extensively presented and recommended in an extra video. This gives the impression that the course content cannot be sufficiently understood without this literature. Therefore, I would expect the specific recommend chapters to be made available for the participants of the course, especially since this is a paid course. | a way that it supports the | Content | However, it felt very much like | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | The course is well prepared, thought through, coherent and structured in a way that it supports the content. However, it felt very much like being in an advertisement program for PMBOK. This feeling was supported by the unavailability of all course materials. Throughout the course the PMBOK guide was included as the suggested reading. The PMBOK materials were featured in each and every lecture and the guidebook was extensively presented and recommended in an extra video. This gives the impression that the course content cannot be sufficiently understood without this literature. Therefore, I would expect the specific recommend chapters to be made available for the participants of the course, especially since this is a paid course. | gives the impression that the course | Content | cannot be sufficiently understood without this | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | I found this course disappointing. Whilst the presenter, Margaret Meloni, was enthusiastic and pleasant to listen to, the content was very sparse indeed. A large part of the content each week was simply reading a presentation which you could get from a book. I would expect an online course to be more interactive, have more videos, and more varied content. I found the case studies (where you had to imagine a real life situation and select a decision) useful - there was one of these per week when I think there could have been more, perhaps three a week. The course would also have been improved by the use of peer assessment on the assignments. This would have made them feel more worthwhile and that someone else was actually reading them. | and pleasant to listen to, the | Content | was very sparse indeed. A large | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | I found this course disappointing. Whilst the presenter, Margaret Meloni, was enthusiastic and pleasant to listen to, the content was very sparse indeed. A large part of the content each week was simply reading a presentation which you could get from a book. I would expect an online course to be more interactive, have more videos, and more varied content. I found the case studies (where you had to imagine a real life situation and select a decision) useful - there was one of these per week when I think there could have been more, perhaps three a week. The course would also have been improved by the use of peer assessment on the assignments. This would have made them feel more worthwhile and that someone else was actually reading them. | indeed. A large part of the | Content | each week was simply reading a | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | I found this course disappointing. Whilst the presenter, Margaret Meloni, was enthusiastic and pleasant to listen to, the content was very sparse indeed. A large part of the content each week was simply reading a presentation which you could get from a book. I would expect an online course to be more interactive, have more videos, and more varied content. I found the case studies (where you had to imagine a real life situation and select a decision) useful - there was one of these per week when I think there could have been more, perhaps three a week. The course would also have been improved by the use of peer assessment on the assignments. This would have made them feel more worthwhile and that someone else was actually reading them. | have more videos, and more varied | Content | I found the case studies (where | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Very good and easy to understand course content. | good and easy to understand course | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | The content and the lay out of the course is amazingly prepared and presented. | The | Content | and the lay out of the | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | The content is good but the quiz and final exam are way too easy... | The | Content | is good but the quiz and | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | High fluidity lessons and a lot of content and advises, orientation, concepts compacted in a perfect way. High value knowledge for a manager or operational position. | fluidity lessons and a lot of | Content | and advises, orientation, concepts compacted in | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Course content is well-structured and good references are given. What can be improved is that I want to see how these skills can be applied in real life situations. It'd be great if discussion session can be organized by Coursera, basically coordinate students to form discussion groups and meet at least once a week to discuss the topics covered that week. | Course | Content | is well-structured and good references are | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | The syllabus is carefully structured. Well defined topics and the content is very well written and easy to understand. As a beginner I had absolutely no problem whatsoever in completing the course. | structured. Well defined topics and the | Content | is very well written and easy | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | I really enjoyed the content presented!!! | I really enjoyed the | Content | presented! ! ! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Content is very well organized within flash presentation and video lectures that are complementary to one another and also interrelated. The step by step approach really helps students to go through its content smoothly. | | Content | is very well organized within flash | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Content is very well organized within flash presentation and video lectures that are complementary to one another and also interrelated. The step by step approach really helps students to go through its content smoothly. | helps students to go through its | Content | smoothly. | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | I really enjoyed the content and the instructor. | I really enjoyed the | Content | and the instructor. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | it was a good learning experience , course content is excellent | a good learning experience , course | Content | is excellent | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Informative and clearly structured course. However, its content is aimed at professional project managers - useful but not exactly what I was looking for ! | and clearly structured course. However, its | Content | is aimed at professional project managers | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Excellent course content and support for the lectures! | Excellent course | Content | and support for the lectures! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Course goes over the most basic points, but also allows you (if you are interested) to dive much deeper into the content. Seems it has everything any project manager would want, so definitely worth taking. Would have wanted the questions to be a little more difficult and potentially more questions to help make sure the information was retained. Overall a great course. | to dive much deeper into the | Content | Seems it has everything any project | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | The content is great, but the most part is presented using flash-based pages :/ | The | Content | is great, but the most part | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| ISGr03Q9EeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | I've enjoyed the material/ideas in this course and the way Kris Plachy presented the information. I do like her Introductions before content, and then ending each lecture with her Summary. And definitely enjoy her Podcasts during the course, they are very valuable and reinforcing. (I also appreciate her 'signature chuckle' ... gotta love it.) .... M | I do like her Introductions before | Content | and then ending each lecture with | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It is very clear and useful course. It holds one hand to go sure through the contents. Anyway, I would suggest to end at certain point doing something simple in R, to give an end to this chapter in this story. | hand to go sure through the | Content | Anyway, I would suggest to end | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A nice slow intro to Coursera, but not a ton of actual content. Good to get your feet wet, but skippable if you are familiar with the basics of the toolbox or taking courses on Coursera. | but not a ton of actual | Content | Good to get your feet wet, | Negative | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | This was really basic information. It's not really a 4 week course. It takes several hours. The info is necessary, but it's sufficient as a single week of content for a larger course. | sufficient as a single week of | Content | for a larger course. | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A light introduction to the Data Science field, in many ways it can be difficult for inexperienced people with software or inexperienced with stats - in my case it was not very difficult since some of the topics were already familiar. The course can be done in a couple of days if the topics are already familiar, in my opinion the course's contents are perfect for someone very new to this field. I would have rated more stars if the course's content was more "objective" for people unfamiliar with the subject - other than that it's perfect. | familiar, in my opinion the course's | Content | are perfect for someone very new | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A light introduction to the Data Science field, in many ways it can be difficult for inexperienced people with software or inexperienced with stats - in my case it was not very difficult since some of the topics were already familiar. The course can be done in a couple of days if the topics are already familiar, in my opinion the course's contents are perfect for someone very new to this field. I would have rated more stars if the course's content was more "objective" for people unfamiliar with the subject - other than that it's perfect. | rated more stars if the course's | Content | was more " objective" for people | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | This is a really basic course. If you have never touch code before, it's more useful, but little is actually covered here and the gap between it's contents and the next class, R programming is dramatic. | here and the gap between it's | Content | and the next class, R programming | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Expectations for simply meeting the baseline learning objectives or to outpoint it aren't exactly clear and there are two monitor strings that are far from being clear (15 minute guide on xyz). Content and evaluations match in requirements. I learned a lot about softwares and databases in with which I can learn and work. | clear (15 minute guide on xyz). | Content | and evaluations match in requirements. I | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Overall the course content is good, but the power points are not engaging and interactive. | Overall the course | Content | is good, but the power points | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very little content | Very little | Content | | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Extremely helpful. It was detailed and at the same time brief, made sure I am able to connect with the content and learn in ways that will be useful in career. Also, the exams and exercises made sure that my concepts are deep rooted into me. Great Course. | am able to connect with the | Content | and learn in ways that will | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Succeeds in conveying course prerequisites, contents and benefits. | Succeeds in conveying course prerequisites, | Content | and benefits. | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Useless. The information content is close to zero. Just some blah-blah and a long tutorial to install software. | Useless. The information | Content | is close to zero. Just some | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Excelent introduction course, useful content. | Excelent introduction course, useful | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Way too basic for the price - almost no content - this is just setup - I resent paying for setup instructions. | for the price - almost no | Content | - this is just setup - | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Not much content for this course, can be done in a few hours. | Not much | Content | for this course, can be done | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | I found this course to have very useful material and good, clear explanations. My only criticism is that the last of the four weeks has practically no content. There are no lectures and the only assignment is grading the assignments of other students, which at most takes 20 minutes. | the four weeks has practically no | Content | There are no lectures and the | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | great content, a little long course for the provided content | great | Content | a little long course for the | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | great content, a little long course for the provided content | little long course for the provided | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | the speech is too fast to be catch up with and doesn't have much useful contents | with and doesn't have much useful | Content | | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Experimental Design is very great. Other contents are just fundamental for beginners. | Experimental Design is very great. Other | Content | are just fundamental for beginners. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It has almost no content and isn't actually useful. I've heard later classes in the series are way tougher, so the ramp up isn't at all good. | It has almost no | Content | and isn't actually useful. I've heard | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Awesome content. I'm happy with the results. | Awesome | Content | I'm happy with the results. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Basic content with detail course materials. Helpful. | Basic | Content | with detail course materials. Helpful. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Course content gives a clear and easy information. | Course | Content | gives a clear and easy information. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | The course accomplished its goal. Nevertheless, since it is a paid course I expected to find more theoretical content | I expected to find more theoretical | Content | | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Content is very nice. | | Content | is very nice. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Only include very basic contents, doesn't need 4 weeks to finish this course. More like a one or two day induction session. | Only include very basic | Content | doesn't need 4 weeks to finish | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | The course is in fact an overall intro to the full data science specialization. Some of the content are useful; but some of the quiz questions are not very informative, and don't really test on stats... | data science specialization. Some of the | Content | are useful; but some of the | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Nicely taught and good course contents. | Nicely taught and good course | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Basic tools for shareing and develop that right now I don´t consider usefull. In the other hand, the content is well explained so right now I new how to use new tools. | usefull. In the other hand, the | Content | is well explained so right now | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Nice introduction but actually very little content | Nice introduction but actually very little | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | The instructors are great, but I think the content of this course should be embbeded in other module. Despiting being important, the topics covered here are very introductory. I recognizes, though, they are important to align expectation and to put everyone in a minimum ground of knowledge. However, I am not sure if Coursera should charge US$ 29,00 for it. | are great, but I think the | Content | of this course should be embbeded | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | The course is great, I just think the course should has a little more content to be perfect. | course should has a little more | Content | to be perfect. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | very good content | very good | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | The overall outline are great. However, the contents and requirements of this course are too simple to be integrated as a whole course. I think 1 lecture should be enough. I am looking forward to deeper introduction. | overall outline are great. However, the | Content | and requirements of this course are | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very nice introduction to the specialization. It provides a lot of useful content to start being a data scientist. | It provides a lot of useful | Content | to start being a data scientist. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | I think there are only few contents. | I think there are only few | Content | | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good course about getting the basics for the Data Science specialization, but a bit overpriced, as the content is low, and can easily be done in 4-5 hours. | but a bit overpriced, as the | Content | is low, and can easily be | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Although the content is correct, quality models videos and materials is very low, wanted to make all the specialization, but I'm not satisfied with the quality of the course. It's a shame, because the JHU is an excellent University | Although the | Content | is correct, quality models videos and | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Great course! Explains the details of what is in the content of the rest of the certificate while not being too detailed. Showed which classes will be related to the content of each part of the introduction. Did a great job of setting up all required tools for the the R programming course (which I am currently taking). | details of what is in the | Content | of the rest of the certificate | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Great course! Explains the details of what is in the content of the rest of the certificate while not being too detailed. Showed which classes will be related to the content of each part of the introduction. Did a great job of setting up all required tools for the the R programming course (which I am currently taking). | classes will be related to the | Content | of each part of the introduction. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Too basic content. I have not learned anything with this course (installing R and RStudio should not be part of exercises or lectures). I hope R programming course will be better | Too basic | Content | I have not learned anything with | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Not really enough content to be a course in it's own right, should be additional material as is useful, but definitely not a requirement. | Not really enough | Content | to be a course in it's | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very short and just a basic overview on how to install a few tools that most of them I already had installed. All this course content could be packed into an introductory lesson instead of having to pay for it. I abandoned the specialisation because of this, I know it's a big business but at least you need to offer some value for the money | already had installed. All this course | Content | could be packed into an introductory | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Well. I don't think this could be categorized as a course. You can think of it as table of content for the specialization. | think of it as table of | Content | for the specialization. | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Informative and helps people like me who are willing to learn from scartch. The course content though can do with a little more updation. | to learn from scartch. The course | Content | though can do with a little | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | The content is very basic. The whole course took my around 6 hours to finish. I think the instructor should add more solid training on GitHub. | The | Content | is very basic. The whole course | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very informative course. The Quiz questions however may not be necessarily be in the course content. | be necessarily be in the course | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | The course content is very useful, but explanations are short and It's unclear how to install R studio for the Windows (I found it at Youtube). Also I had a problem how to install the R packages, and solution was simple: you should run it as administrator (it wasn't in lecture). | The course | Content | is very useful, but explanations are | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introductory course. Learnt a more structured approach to categorising statistical methods. Much of the rest of the content was a bit basic, though probably useful to fill in any knowledge gaps pre-course. | Much of the rest of the | Content | was a bit basic, though probably | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | As advertised, satisfied with the content | As advertised, satisfied with the | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | I'm doing this training for the second time, now as a beta-tester. Particular comments about lecture content, problems, etc. have been put in every lecture. General comments, in short: 1) Related to the new platform and UI design: _ It is cleaner and simpler than the previous one. I like it, BUT... _ It lacks of some useful features: saving intermediate results in quizzes before submit them; calendar; limited number of subforums. _ The most relevant flaw: there are not downloadable versions of lecture slides. Unacceptable! No way to check most of the links we saw in slides (URLs not visible). _ Description and steps in course project appear "too packed" together. I prefer the former design. 2) Related to content: _ The course is mainly for preparing students for the rest of data science specialization program. When you said "toolbox" you mean the concrete toolbox you will need to do the program. Some people expect to have a general introduction to data science but that is only a half of the content. I think this is clear enough in the presentation but for some reasons there are people in forums who protest the content, so maybe you should insist more in this fact. _ I would like to suggest some kind of reorder of material: week 2 is all about installing a running tools and week 3 about key aspects of data analysis. Maybe you can split both types of content between wk2 and wk3 to make wk2 more appealing for not technical oriented students. _ Git is a source of problems for a good portion of people. See my comments in lectures about how Git is explained. | a beta-tester. Particular comments about lecture | Content | problems, etc. have been put in | Negative | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | I'm doing this training for the second time, now as a beta-tester. Particular comments about lecture content, problems, etc. have been put in every lecture. General comments, in short: 1) Related to the new platform and UI design: _ It is cleaner and simpler than the previous one. I like it, BUT... _ It lacks of some useful features: saving intermediate results in quizzes before submit them; calendar; limited number of subforums. _ The most relevant flaw: there are not downloadable versions of lecture slides. Unacceptable! No way to check most of the links we saw in slides (URLs not visible). _ Description and steps in course project appear "too packed" together. I prefer the former design. 2) Related to content: _ The course is mainly for preparing students for the rest of data science specialization program. When you said "toolbox" you mean the concrete toolbox you will need to do the program. Some people expect to have a general introduction to data science but that is only a half of the content. I think this is clear enough in the presentation but for some reasons there are people in forums who protest the content, so maybe you should insist more in this fact. _ I would like to suggest some kind of reorder of material: week 2 is all about installing a running tools and week 3 about key aspects of data analysis. Maybe you can split both types of content between wk2 and wk3 to make wk2 more appealing for not technical oriented students. _ Git is a source of problems for a good portion of people. See my comments in lectures about how Git is explained. | the former design. 2) Related to | Content | _ The course is mainly for | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | I'm doing this training for the second time, now as a beta-tester. Particular comments about lecture content, problems, etc. have been put in every lecture. General comments, in short: 1) Related to the new platform and UI design: _ It is cleaner and simpler than the previous one. I like it, BUT... _ It lacks of some useful features: saving intermediate results in quizzes before submit them; calendar; limited number of subforums. _ The most relevant flaw: there are not downloadable versions of lecture slides. Unacceptable! No way to check most of the links we saw in slides (URLs not visible). _ Description and steps in course project appear "too packed" together. I prefer the former design. 2) Related to content: _ The course is mainly for preparing students for the rest of data science specialization program. When you said "toolbox" you mean the concrete toolbox you will need to do the program. Some people expect to have a general introduction to data science but that is only a half of the content. I think this is clear enough in the presentation but for some reasons there are people in forums who protest the content, so maybe you should insist more in this fact. _ I would like to suggest some kind of reorder of material: week 2 is all about installing a running tools and week 3 about key aspects of data analysis. Maybe you can split both types of content between wk2 and wk3 to make wk2 more appealing for not technical oriented students. _ Git is a source of problems for a good portion of people. See my comments in lectures about how Git is explained. | is only a half of the | Content | I think this is clear enough | Negative | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | I'm doing this training for the second time, now as a beta-tester. Particular comments about lecture content, problems, etc. have been put in every lecture. General comments, in short: 1) Related to the new platform and UI design: _ It is cleaner and simpler than the previous one. I like it, BUT... _ It lacks of some useful features: saving intermediate results in quizzes before submit them; calendar; limited number of subforums. _ The most relevant flaw: there are not downloadable versions of lecture slides. Unacceptable! No way to check most of the links we saw in slides (URLs not visible). _ Description and steps in course project appear "too packed" together. I prefer the former design. 2) Related to content: _ The course is mainly for preparing students for the rest of data science specialization program. When you said "toolbox" you mean the concrete toolbox you will need to do the program. Some people expect to have a general introduction to data science but that is only a half of the content. I think this is clear enough in the presentation but for some reasons there are people in forums who protest the content, so maybe you should insist more in this fact. _ I would like to suggest some kind of reorder of material: week 2 is all about installing a running tools and week 3 about key aspects of data analysis. Maybe you can split both types of content between wk2 and wk3 to make wk2 more appealing for not technical oriented students. _ Git is a source of problems for a good portion of people. See my comments in lectures about how Git is explained. | people in forums who protest the | Content | so maybe you should insist more | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | I'm doing this training for the second time, now as a beta-tester. Particular comments about lecture content, problems, etc. have been put in every lecture. General comments, in short: 1) Related to the new platform and UI design: _ It is cleaner and simpler than the previous one. I like it, BUT... _ It lacks of some useful features: saving intermediate results in quizzes before submit them; calendar; limited number of subforums. _ The most relevant flaw: there are not downloadable versions of lecture slides. Unacceptable! No way to check most of the links we saw in slides (URLs not visible). _ Description and steps in course project appear "too packed" together. I prefer the former design. 2) Related to content: _ The course is mainly for preparing students for the rest of data science specialization program. When you said "toolbox" you mean the concrete toolbox you will need to do the program. Some people expect to have a general introduction to data science but that is only a half of the content. I think this is clear enough in the presentation but for some reasons there are people in forums who protest the content, so maybe you should insist more in this fact. _ I would like to suggest some kind of reorder of material: week 2 is all about installing a running tools and week 3 about key aspects of data analysis. Maybe you can split both types of content between wk2 and wk3 to make wk2 more appealing for not technical oriented students. _ Git is a source of problems for a good portion of people. See my comments in lectures about how Git is explained. | you can split both types of | Content | between wk2 and wk3 to make | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | I would like to report some major issues with the new interface. 1) We don't have access to the slides anymore. This is a major issues since some of the slides content important links. These links are not shown in the transcript (I've double checked). 2) When we try to download the videos, subtitles or transcript, the resulting file name is the same for all content of the same type. More specifically, all videos are named "index.mp4", all subtitle files are named "subtitles.vtt" and all transcript files are named "subtitle.txt". This makes it more difficult for the student to save the files. In the previous version I would only right-click and saved in the right directory. Now, I have to right click, type the right name (which could be long sometimes) and then save the file. 3) In the previous interface, it was possible to see all the threads we were subscribed to. It is no more the case. It is not a problem right now, because there is not a lot of posts, but in cases where the number of post increase, it will be a pain to go through the list of threads and find the ones of interest. Please ignore the review for now, I couldn't submit my comments without reviewing the course. More comments may follow later... | issues since some of the slides | Content | important links. These links are not | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | I would like to report some major issues with the new interface. 1) We don't have access to the slides anymore. This is a major issues since some of the slides content important links. These links are not shown in the transcript (I've double checked). 2) When we try to download the videos, subtitles or transcript, the resulting file name is the same for all content of the same type. More specifically, all videos are named "index.mp4", all subtitle files are named "subtitles.vtt" and all transcript files are named "subtitle.txt". This makes it more difficult for the student to save the files. In the previous version I would only right-click and saved in the right directory. Now, I have to right click, type the right name (which could be long sometimes) and then save the file. 3) In the previous interface, it was possible to see all the threads we were subscribed to. It is no more the case. It is not a problem right now, because there is not a lot of posts, but in cases where the number of post increase, it will be a pain to go through the list of threads and find the ones of interest. Please ignore the review for now, I couldn't submit my comments without reviewing the course. More comments may follow later... | name is the same for all | Content | of the same type. More specifically, | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| It7SNTe-EeWCYBKNeFwojw | Excellent content - best course on angular js on the internet, and for free. Amazing attention to detail. | Excellent | Content | - best course on angular js | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| It7SNTe-EeWCYBKNeFwojw | The videos are clear, easy to follow and with plenty of examples, great information and content. Lots of material and sources to read, actually in my case not enough time to read it. The teacher YaaKov is a great instructor, his assignments are written in great detail and very clear steps, so is easy to comprehend and execute. The teacher as well as the teaching staff always answer promptly and in depth your questions or comments in the forum. This is my second course with Yaakov Chaikin and I am very happy with this particular course and the great instructor and the extra resources he offers to learn . | plenty of examples, great information and | Content | Lots of material and sources to | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| iXq6zSWTEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Really good organized , great content and easy learning process. | Really good organized , great | Content | and easy learning process. | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| iXq6zSWTEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | I enjoyed the content and learned a lot about the many different facets to take into account when implementing a strategy which at first glance may not visible. | I enjoyed the | Content | and learned a lot about the | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| iXq6zSWTEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Amazing course with rich content of concepts and tools. It would be perfect if assisted with recommended readings | Amazing course with rich | Content | of concepts and tools. It would | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| iXq6zSWTEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | The contents and structure of the course was very good. I enjoyed taking all the sessions. | The | Content | and structure of the course was | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| iXq6zSWTEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Material was very good and well structured. I think that one main issue is the assignment. We would need much more info/hard facts to make it much more interesting (i.e. less theoritical). Moreover, assignments are reviewed by people 1/ who did not necessarily went through the 2 previous courses 2/ did not see our previous documents ie for course 1 and 2 3/ did not necessarily understand the question (one person complained because I did not answer the question "edgy vs. conservative" => I guess she was misled by the support info which were the same as for the first course). This problem could be avoided by offering a distinct case for each assignment, so that there is no confusion/mis-match. In any case, "mange tak" for all your courses. I went through 3 so far, and the ones from CBS are clearly the best I had (videos - content and speed - slides/ support documents, quizzes). | the best I had (videos - | Content | and speed - slides/ support documents, | Positive | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| iXq6zSWTEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Great Professor and Great Content. Very very insightful. | Great Professor and Great | Content | Very very insightful. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| jA4AZLlTEeWfYA612mWHZw | They jump around too much and it is very hard to follow. Often I feel like I missed out on content. | feel like I missed out on | Content | | Negative | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| jA4AZLlTEeWfYA612mWHZw | No content for the first two weeks. Only links to websites. | No | Content | for the first two weeks. Only | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| jA4AZLlTEeWfYA612mWHZw | I normally struggle to give poor reviews to free online content, but there are so many glaring fundamental issues with the presentation and content of this course, that it I feel it's important to warn people not to waste their time with this course in it's current form. The mapping and planning lectures raise some good points, but the rest give only the most basic overview of the topic at hand, glossing over steps enough that you would probably learn just as much watching youtube, or looking around inside wordpress on your own. The delivery of the lectures needs a lot of work, with distracting, erratic pauses between words, and the sound frequently cutting out mid-word as they switch between slides. I found it difficult to make it through more than 15 minutes of content. I gave more than 1 star because the links underneath the slides contain some valuable information, so if you can be bothered trawling through the slides you can gleam some knowledge there. Hopefully the creators of the course take on board the many negative reviews and give a major overhaul to the course, to bring it in line with the quality of almost all other content on Coursera. | give poor reviews to free online | Content | but there are so many glaring | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| jA4AZLlTEeWfYA612mWHZw | I normally struggle to give poor reviews to free online content, but there are so many glaring fundamental issues with the presentation and content of this course, that it I feel it's important to warn people not to waste their time with this course in it's current form. The mapping and planning lectures raise some good points, but the rest give only the most basic overview of the topic at hand, glossing over steps enough that you would probably learn just as much watching youtube, or looking around inside wordpress on your own. The delivery of the lectures needs a lot of work, with distracting, erratic pauses between words, and the sound frequently cutting out mid-word as they switch between slides. I found it difficult to make it through more than 15 minutes of content. I gave more than 1 star because the links underneath the slides contain some valuable information, so if you can be bothered trawling through the slides you can gleam some knowledge there. Hopefully the creators of the course take on board the many negative reviews and give a major overhaul to the course, to bring it in line with the quality of almost all other content on Coursera. | fundamental issues with the presentation and | Content | of this course, that it I | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| jA4AZLlTEeWfYA612mWHZw | I normally struggle to give poor reviews to free online content, but there are so many glaring fundamental issues with the presentation and content of this course, that it I feel it's important to warn people not to waste their time with this course in it's current form. The mapping and planning lectures raise some good points, but the rest give only the most basic overview of the topic at hand, glossing over steps enough that you would probably learn just as much watching youtube, or looking around inside wordpress on your own. The delivery of the lectures needs a lot of work, with distracting, erratic pauses between words, and the sound frequently cutting out mid-word as they switch between slides. I found it difficult to make it through more than 15 minutes of content. I gave more than 1 star because the links underneath the slides contain some valuable information, so if you can be bothered trawling through the slides you can gleam some knowledge there. Hopefully the creators of the course take on board the many negative reviews and give a major overhaul to the course, to bring it in line with the quality of almost all other content on Coursera. | through more than 15 minutes of | Content | I gave more than 1 star | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| jA4AZLlTEeWfYA612mWHZw | I normally struggle to give poor reviews to free online content, but there are so many glaring fundamental issues with the presentation and content of this course, that it I feel it's important to warn people not to waste their time with this course in it's current form. The mapping and planning lectures raise some good points, but the rest give only the most basic overview of the topic at hand, glossing over steps enough that you would probably learn just as much watching youtube, or looking around inside wordpress on your own. The delivery of the lectures needs a lot of work, with distracting, erratic pauses between words, and the sound frequently cutting out mid-word as they switch between slides. I found it difficult to make it through more than 15 minutes of content. I gave more than 1 star because the links underneath the slides contain some valuable information, so if you can be bothered trawling through the slides you can gleam some knowledge there. Hopefully the creators of the course take on board the many negative reviews and give a major overhaul to the course, to bring it in line with the quality of almost all other content on Coursera. | the quality of almost all other | Content | on Coursera. | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| jA4AZLlTEeWfYA612mWHZw | The content for teaching how to create website is nothing. The name should change to how to create a website with Wordpress. I found some videos on the internet help more than this course. However, some links and information are very useful. | The | Content | for teaching how to create website | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| jA4AZLlTEeWfYA612mWHZw | 1 out of 10. A waste of time. If I cannot participate in discussions, forums, submit assignments, or give reviews, I might as well watch youtube lectures. The course content was very poor as well. (this is based on the unpaid material) This course should be scrapped and not offered as an unpaid course. Its a classical case of bait and switch. | well watch youtube lectures. The course | Content | was very poor as well. (this | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| JBCvTm03EeWEewoyD2Bc5Q | Great content! This definitely challenges the mindset of what it takes to be a business owner or entrepreneur. One opportunity I see for the course is to better link the quiz language to what's taught in the videos and the articles, especially for the open ended questions. Those specific points can get lost in all of the ideas shared. | Great | Content | This definitely challenges the mindset of | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| JBCvTm03EeWEewoyD2Bc5Q | Overall it was good. However, the content delivery could have been better. | Overall it was good. However, the | Content | delivery could have been better. | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| JBCvTm03EeWEewoyD2Bc5Q | Good and straightforward content but with so very little written excercises and thus very little room for lecturer feedback - I would not pay an additional 100$ just to get rated like that (I might consider it if the price included the mentioned books though). Still - I find it a very well designed, concise course. Thank you! | Good and straightforward | Content | but with so very little written | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| jcbwGG00EeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | The content was very useful. However, a little more detail could have been provided while explaining a few concepts. I am confident of using these frameworks in the future. However, before applying them I will have to visit the material again. Thank you so much. | The | Content | was very useful. However, a little | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| jcbwGG00EeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | what an organized , clear and understandable videos and content , | , clear and understandable videos and | Content | , | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| jcbwGG00EeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | the language of this video is to high, it's like to be for reading more than speaking ( Too Formal). The Content is quite good, but it needs more time in order to fully understand it. | than speaking ( Too Formal). The | Content | is quite good, but it needs | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| jcbwGG00EeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Relevant content. Amazing teaching. | Relevant | Content | Amazing teaching. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| jcbwGG00EeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Overall, great course. The contents are meaningful and useful. IE's widely recognised expertise comes through all | Overall, great course. The | Content | are meaningful and useful. IE's widely | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| jcbwGG00EeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Great course with solid content and concepts, i definitely recommend it. I didn't gave a 5 star review only because i felt that more examples were needed on module 4. | Great course with solid | Content | and concepts, i definitely recommend it. | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| jcbwGG00EeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Okay course. Techniques and content are a bit too traditional. | Okay course. Techniques and | Content | are a bit too traditional. | Positive | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | Video after video of lengthy lecture with little variation. It's a long content dump with just two peer-reviewed assignments. If this is the best online Princeton can do, count me out. | with little variation. It's a long | Content | dump with just two peer-reviewed assignments. | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | I think professor Wright is an effective teacher. The class introduces these concepts in a clear way. It isn't academically challenging in the sense that there are difficult assignments, but there are a couple essays that help ensure that you are understanding the content. It's a great introduction for someone who knows little about Buddhism or how it stands from a psychological standpoint. | ensure that you are understanding the | Content | It's a great introduction for someone | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | Completely amazing! Super clear explanations and excellent contents! Should take it. | amazing! Super clear explanations and excellent | Content | Should take it. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | This is the first Coursera course that I have taken, and I was extremely glad to have taken it. Robert Wright is a wonderful lecturer - extremely intelligent, engaging and also adds some fun to the content. Thank you Robert - I learnt a surprising amount in many unexpected areas. I am glad to have encountered you and am already beginning to seek out other material that you have produced. | also adds some fun to the | Content | Thank you Robert - I learnt | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | Language fails in describing the Buddha's teaching of concepts such as Non-Self and the experience of deep meditation common to long-time meditators. This is even harder when you consider many learners are from the Western tradition represented by logic, rationale, science, and monotheism. Yet Professor Wright has done a brilliant job of getting the learner to understand what the Buddha taught, using language, metaphors, office hours and interviews with many scientists, scholars and monks to do so very well. More than the cerebral understanding of the content of any book I have read on Buddhism, I can honestly say I now have a far clearer understanding of the profoundness of the Buddha's teaching and why he insisted we all have to find our own way. I will even go so far as to say I now don't really see my much vaunted mind as my true self. In that sense, this is truly mind-blowing! For that, my heartfelt thanks and gratitude to Professor Wright and to his interview guests. | than the cerebral understanding of the | Content | of any book I have read | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | I love the course, but sometimes the content is too dense and deep so some concepts are hard to grasp. =D | love the course, but sometimes the | Content | is too dense and deep so | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | Well worth the time. I am someone who has been meditating for a few years and I am practicing Psychologist and Psychotherapist. I was interested to understand how my experiences with meditation can relate to the word of modern psychology and this course was very persuasive in its approach and content. | very persuasive in its approach and | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | This course was very interesting and well prepared. Not overwhelming but with plenty of good content. | overwhelming but with plenty of good | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | Kept me interested in the course, the content and lecturer were excellent | me interested in the course, the | Content | and lecturer were excellent | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | Engaging content and excellent pace. While the level is introductory (I'd have liked a bit more depth), I would expect this from a lower-division/breadth course—and even more so from a MOOC like this. | Engaging | Content | and excellent pace. While the level | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | Very very introductory. This course explores the Buddhist theory of suffering and liberation by comparing it to evolutionary psychological theories. It is not a deep course on Buddhism - it lacks any substantive discussion of differences between Buddhist schools, of the difficulty of reconstructing the "historical" Buddha (a problem as difficult as reconstructing the "historical Christ"), of the fact that Buddhism as popularized in the West is actually quite different from any of the Asian forms of Buddhism, etc. Also, evolutionary psychology is controversial in its own right - one criticism of it is that it creates "just-so" stories about the origins of mental processes that are impossible to verify (or falsify). These objections are well known, but are not confronted in the course. A scholarly much sounder and deeper course is the one on Tibetan Buddhism from University of Virginia. It suffers from truly appalling presentation (the video lectures are some of the most boring I have ever watched), but the diversity of angles from which Buddhism is examined, and the depth of content are really outstanding. | is examined, and the depth of | Content | are really outstanding. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | Excellent course content and professor | Excellent course | Content | and professor | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | Content and lectures are awesome. Wright is a brilliant teacher. | | Content | and lectures are awesome. Wright is | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | Engaging, challenging course content. Numerous ways to interact with course mates. Appropriate assignments and discussions. Professional and knowledgeable coverage of the content. | Engaging, challenging course | Content | Numerous ways to interact with course | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | Engaging, challenging course content. Numerous ways to interact with course mates. Appropriate assignments and discussions. Professional and knowledgeable coverage of the content. | Professional and knowledgeable coverage of the | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | Buddhist lite but very interesting to consider evolutionary psychology. Excellent contributors to the course content. | psychology. Excellent contributors to the course | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Good contents! However, the lectures are long and a bit rushed. This course is definitely not for everyone! Assignment for week 3 definitely need an extra lecture to explain to do PID tuning. | Good | Content | However, the lectures are long and | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Very good contents. Excellent assignments. You'll need to work hard to pass it but you enjoy the effort. | Very good | Content | Excellent assignments. You'll need to work | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Really testing course. Get's pretty tricky, especially the final assignment. The staff is really helpful and the content is top-notch. | staff is really helpful and the | Content | is top-notch. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Just perfect. Nice content, nice lectures and very helpful staff. | Just perfect. Nice | Content | nice lectures and very helpful staff. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | This is a very nice class about the aerial robotics. If the more background materials about the quadrotor are provied in the class content, the class will be better. | quadrotor are provied in the class | Content | the class will be better. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | I think there is need to provide clearer instructions on how to get the programming assignments done. The course content is good, but doing the programming assignments needs to be more clarified. | the programming assignments done. The course | Content | is good, but doing the programming | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | The course is interesting and entertaining at times, though seems relatively undercooked. Typos in video lectures and assignment writeups are still frequent. The course content is a bit rushed, with some rather difficult aspects left almost unexplained. Definitely not for begginers, as some knowledge of physics, differential equations, calculus, matlab programming is highly recommended! | writeups are still frequent. The course | Content | is a bit rushed, with some | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Has allot of typos but the content is good overall | Has allot of typos but the | Content | is good overall | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | I found the course fun and engaging. I studied Physics a while ago; without this I think I would have had problems following the contents. I wish the first two programming assignments were combined, so that there was room for another assignment for implementing a full 3d controller that doesn't assume a linearization around the hover state. | would have had problems following the | Content | I wish the first two programming | Negative | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | This course had an excellent syllabus, but left much to be desired in the methodology adopted for teaching. There was very low involvement of the TA in the discussion forums and there should have been more material given to help bridge the gap between pre requisites and the course content. | between pre requisites and the course | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | So close but yet so far ... Course concepts are interesting and the programming assignments are fun but the presentation can be greatly improved. Criticisms include: (i) The course isn't self contained. Physical concepts like 'resultant moment', 'inertial and body-fixed frame' and 'torque' are used without definition. Mechanics is not listed as a prerequisite but it should be. (ii) Lectures are very mathematical but proofs, intuition and good problem sets are all missing. Listening to a math lecture without doing challenging problems or deriving mathematical results to build intuition can be a waste of time. Check out John Cochrane's Asset Pricing 1 and 2 or Tim Roughgarden's Algo 1 and 2 for great examples of thoughtful problem sets and intuitive derivations. (iii) Way too much powerpoint! Speed reading a static powerpoint slide overloaded with dense mathematical formulas without using pointers or animations to focus the students attention is a recipe for confusion and frustration. I find hand written derivations, even when the handwriting is a little sloppy, much easier to follow than a static page of formulas plus a sound track. Hand written derivations impose a natural pace and focal point to the content. Check out Gilbert Strang's Linear Algebra, Sebastian Thrun's Artificial Intelligence for Robotics and Andrew Ng's Machine Learning for examples of good derivations of mathematically sophisticated material. (iv) The programming assignments while fun were somewhat ad hoc and disconnected from the lecture material, specifically, the main task of every single assignment was to hand tune a pd controller. No systematic approach was ever described for performing this task. | pace and focal point to the | Content | Check out Gilbert Strang's Linear Algebra, | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | This is a more difficult online course that you will come across. I give 4 stars because of the pretty nice content. Learning about writing linear controllers for the desired trajectory in 3D is the best thing we can get out of the course. I don't think this course qualifies as a beginner specialization. Basics (and perhaps little more details) of the topics from Dynamics(Euler equations, differentiation of a vector expressed in one frame wrt to another frame), controls and bit of computation(complexity) is needed. Topics like "Calculus of variation" were simply new to me and you have to work little more harder to understand the different equations which will be presented without any derivation. Biggest downside is TA's or other support staff is not pro-active. Perhaps they will improve in the future runs. | stars because of the pretty nice | Content | Learning about writing linear controllers for | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | The content is awesome and the quizzes and assignments are challenging. What I would incorporate is a little bit more of examples to tackle all the problems new people might encounter (more sample numerical results, and probably samples on how to develop in Matlab, not just reserved words). | The | Content | is awesome and the quizzes and | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| jnoxprrzEeW2iwpbOuagWQ | This is an excellent MOOC. I am a PhD candidate studying human intelligence and spatial cognition specifically associated with problem solving. The content is very well structured and clearly communicated through the lectures. Having been briefly introduced to some of the concepts in my own studies prior to this course I am finding the difficulty level to be quite nice (challenging yet very manageable). The inclusion of various experiments throughout the course is a good idea as it makes it all very interesting. | specifically associated with problem solving. The | Content | is very well structured and clearly | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| JV2US53WEeW4xRJkiwxnYw | I really enjoyed every single lecture, especially that I was also learning French. If you are a lawyer (so you are familiar with the most important legal concepts) and you also possess some good French reading/understanding skills - you don't need to be a French speaker to easily underastand the most of the content of this course. | easily underastand the most of the | Content | of this course. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| K0cCzBtHEeWsqgoIBu2JdQ | Very good course content. Thanks to the instructor. | Very good course | Content | Thanks to the instructor. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Enjoyable content and presentation but the coarse seemed very short compared to others I've taken. Not a criticism but rather and observation. If it was short on purpose that is one thing but I believe there is more to be said on this topic fundamentally and hope to see this course expanded or a second one produced. I would like to that those involved int its creation. | Enjoyable | Content | and presentation but the coarse seemed | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | I learned good stuff. i gave four star because there could be more content some parts were written instead of a lecture. But i will recommend this course. | star because there could be more | Content | some parts were written instead of | Negative | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | I am glad that I have chosen to sign up to this course. It has open up my vision to a whole new world. Thanks so very much. The professor is engaging and the course content is fascinating. | professor is engaging and the course | Content | is fascinating. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | This Course helped me a whole lot in process of writing and how to break down the process for better performance. I really liked how easy and well sorted were the Content of the course and how the assignment was purposely designed for that week. | easy and well sorted were the | Content | of the course and how the | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | The content is good but is too focus in the 3 act structure, and don't explain the narration techniques specifically to videogames genres. The assignments were too repetitives and don't add variety or feeling of progression through the course. I recommend the course for who don't know the basis of the narrative structure, but not for people like me who work in the audiovisual world. | The | Content | is good but is too focus | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | The contents were comprehensive, and the assignments helped reinforce the theory. By using pre-existing references to other works, they were tighter, which I think is useful to focus on the objectives set for a particular week. Some additional creative freedom would also have been interesting. | The | Content | were comprehensive, and the assignments helped | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| k2Ty4TonEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I found the course content to be too simple, hence uninteresting. | I found the course | Content | to be too simple, hence uninteresting. | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| k2Ty4TonEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The content is interesting but the explanation can be more detailed in some parts. Nevertheless, enjoy the thinking. | The | Content | is interesting but the explanation can | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| k8B9WjxkEeW7GArkqhNhJw | Short video but the content is comprehensive and easy to understand. Highly recommended for those who want to understand the ways of the Music Industry. | Short video but the | Content | is comprehensive and easy to understand. | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| k8B9WjxkEeW7GArkqhNhJw | I'm very happy with the content from this course. It is exactly what I was looking for in terms of information about music business. Really interesting and the professor speaks in a very calm and nice way to make our life better to understand the lesson and everything that is said, specially for me that I'm not an English native-speaker. Great job! Well done! | I'm very happy with the | Content | from this course. It is exactly | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| k8B9WjxkEeW7GArkqhNhJw | interesting course content. helps understand the core concepts behind the music business. cheers! | interesting course | Content | helps understand the core concepts behind | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| k9p3Qh8kEeWP0w4yK2369w | The content of the class is very nice. It gives a nice overview on genetics, and it was made accessible to many of us. Also, Mohamed Noor is very enthusiastic, and provides a lot of nice examples to illustrate the course. However, I think some parts of the class were a little bit dizorganized. For instance, I was sometimes confused by the vocabulary or the variable notations which are not always clear. | The | Content | of the class is very nice. | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| kbmiwPT-EeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | Excellent course, wide scale application, highly recommend. Also : -clear presentation -no technical issues with quizzes or content issues | -no technical issues with quizzes or | Content | issues | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| kbmiwPT-EeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | I found this to be extremely interesting. This is the course that you savour every second of. Both content and delivery are superlative. Highly recommended if you have any clue of what models are all about. | you savour every second of. Both | Content | and delivery are superlative. Highly recommended | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| kbmiwPT-EeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | Professor Scott Page is by far one of the most engaging instructors on Coursera. He makes the course content accessible and interesting through his concrete examples. By far this is my favorite class that I've taken online. | on Coursera. He makes the course | Content | accessible and interesting through his concrete | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| kbmiwPT-EeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | Contents of the course are very diverse, clearly changes your way and ability to identify patterns, and fit real world in to models to extract additional information ... It does not have a very in depth, description about most models, but enough to understand them, because there are so many different concepts that are fit together ... Its an excellent introductory course to models. | | Content | of the course are very diverse, | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| kcW15H3JEeWKYwric11Hpw | Very good! I think week 4 was very time consuming, in contrast with week 3, that was very light. Maybe these contents can be better balanced in the fuute. | that was very light. Maybe these | Content | can be better balanced in the | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| kcW15H3JEeWKYwric11Hpw | Great content. Need more exercises, and solution to homeworks (eventually). | Great | Content | Need more exercises, and solution to | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| kcW15H3JEeWKYwric11Hpw | Contents are excellent. The only disappointing is that It costs to submit assignments. | | Content | are excellent. The only disappointing is | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| KinX8iwGEeaA3A6P4rV07Q | Very concise lectures, but sometimes the content of the videos does not fully explain the topics that are covered on the quizzes. | Very concise lectures, but sometimes the | Content | of the videos does not fully | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| KK4EhXQMEeSc3CIACrbZqg | Excellent content. The course is easy to follow and not exhausting at all. It will help me a lot in my career. | Excellent | Content | The course is easy to follow | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | The information was great. My only complaint would be how dry the lectures were, and I do not meant the content, I meant the delivery. | and I do not meant the | Content | I meant the delivery. | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | Thank you for this course, professor Kuhar. I really appreciate the organization and the contents. I appreciate your deeply interest for this subject. | really appreciate the organization and the | Content | I appreciate your deeply interest for | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | The content was great, the presentation was a bit dry, but I feel I got a lot out of this course. | The | Content | was great, the presentation was a | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | Great course! Extremely interesting. Very well presented with fantastic content. Thank you so much! | interesting. Very well presented with fantastic | Content | Thank you so much! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | Fairly interesting course. I learned quite a bit I can say from taking this class. Some of the content seemed irrelevant. But overall a great course! | taking this class. Some of the | Content | seemed irrelevant. But overall a great | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | Really disappointing course. Content is shallow, despite the impressive credentials of the Professor. Quizzes are ridiculously easy. | Really disappointing course. | Content | is shallow, despite the impressive credentials | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | I found both the course content and the Professor very engaging and thorough. I appreciated the methodical manner the scientific content was provided and the visuals were absolutely key to helping me to completely grasp. | I found both the course | Content | and the Professor very engaging and | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | I found both the course content and the Professor very engaging and thorough. I appreciated the methodical manner the scientific content was provided and the visuals were absolutely key to helping me to completely grasp. | appreciated the methodical manner the scientific | Content | was provided and the visuals were | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| koVAwj03EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Very good content and useful. Great Proffesors. | Very good | Content | and useful. Great Proffesors. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| koVAwj03EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | An excellent course, with wonderful content! Very useful and helpful tips to business situations. Thanks very much to Arizona University! | An excellent course, with wonderful | Content | Very useful and helpful tips to | Positive | 0.9 | 4.0 |
| KQ7XaDaaEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I believe you won't learn something really new from this course. If you are familiar with PR, the content is probably common sense. However, this course is extremely effective in organizing all these ideas in order to maximize the way you apply them. For example, we all know that, as a company, we have to engage with our costumers, right? That's common sense. What we don't know is what are all the possible levels of engagement and how can we make the most out of each level. I strongly recommend taking it. | you are familiar with PR, the | Content | is probably common sense. However, this | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| KQ7XaDaaEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | One of the most handy and crisp course content. very useful for people who are in PR. | the most handy and crisp course | Content | very useful for people who are | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Great course. I would like more on how to use Hootsuite and Klout. Also which one is better?? I am finding them a challenge to use. I like to search for my own content as I find the suggested content boring...and often not relevant to what I am looking for. I can't understand why I cannot cut and past links. So, like I said a primer on how to use these sites would be good. | like to search for my own | Content | as I find the suggested content | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Great course. I would like more on how to use Hootsuite and Klout. Also which one is better?? I am finding them a challenge to use. I like to search for my own content as I find the suggested content boring...and often not relevant to what I am looking for. I can't understand why I cannot cut and past links. So, like I said a primer on how to use these sites would be good. | content as I find the suggested | Content | boring. . . and often not | Negative | 0.9 | 4.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | A fantastic introduction into social networks and virtual communities! The Internet neophyte can begin with very little intimidation and come out with a larger picture on how information and content value is processed among online communities | larger picture on how information and | Content | value is processed among online communities | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The content in this course was invaluable and I learned a lot from the instructor videos, guest lectures and assignments. It's already changed the way I am doing business. My one complaint is with the grading system - and this is on Coursera and not on the course. I can't understand first why a peer graded assignment is considered late when I submitted it on time, and it's not my fault that others hadn't reviewed it yet. Similarly on a quiz, there were points given for answers that were supposed to be skipped if you had done the assignment. Therefore, the highest grade you could get on that quiz was a 57%. While passing was a 1%, it's still averaged into my final grade as a 57%. That doesn't make any sense at all. | The | Content | in this course was invaluable and | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Excellent introduction to the essentials of Social Media Marketing. Great content and videos. | essentials of Social Media Marketing. Great | Content | and videos. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I am very happy with the Course content.After first module my understanding of using Social media for my benefit is bit improved.I am sure after Specialization i ll be able to run my business well. I am an Artist and need social/digital marketing to get noticed. Professor Randy Hlavac speech is clear and thoughtful which is very easy to follow for non native English speakers. I am glad i am his student and looking forward to learn more. | am very happy with the Course | Content | After first module my understanding of | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Not recommended for medium or advanced users. As the name says this is just an introduction in Social Media, so if you are already using it you don't have much to learn from this one. I look forward to the other courses from this Specialisation for more in depth content. | this Specialisation for more in depth | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | It is a very practice course - easy but informative content gives me great insight and engage my interest to the next course. | practice course - easy but informative | Content | gives me great insight and engage | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | A little light on content, but has valuable resources for my wife's home business. | A little light on | Content | but has valuable resources for my | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This course has provided me high quality of contents, tips and knowledge I had miss-understood about Social Media before taking the classes. Now I feel like a kind of expert in the issue of Social and an big enthusiast in the task of "identify as specific as you can the market you really want to develop". What amazing assessment! Thank you! | has provided me high quality of | Content | tips and knowledge I had miss-understood | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Well organized, thoughtful, easy to follow. Useful, current content! | thoughtful, easy to follow. Useful, current | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I think the content itself is somewhat too theoretical, it does not usually apply to the reality | I think the | Content | itself is somewhat too theoretical, it | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Instructor was good. Content of whole program was focused on analytics. Perhaps a better title for this course is Social Media Analytics. | Instructor was good. | Content | of whole program was focused on | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The flow and content of this course is fantastic. It's engaging, thought-provoking and really keeps your interest throughout. It is evident that the course leaders have a real passion for this subject and it's an infectious trait for the learners too. | The flow and | Content | of this course is fantastic. It's | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | great content | great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | A wonderful introduction into social media and how it can be used for promotional purposes. Prof Randy Hlavac is clear and insightful, the course content is engaging and interesting, and the assignments are meaningful. Really enjoyed doing this course and definitely considering taking up the other related MOOCs. | is clear and insightful, the course | Content | is engaging and interesting, and the | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The content was very shallow. Not lot of hands on | The | Content | was very shallow. Not lot of | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The instructor is top notch, the professionals invited are the best in their speciality. The structure and content deliver the purpose. I am honestly very excited to have found this opportunity to retool myself professionally, and open doors for a better future. | in their speciality. The structure and | Content | deliver the purpose. I am honestly | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The course offered packaged, essential social information in a way that wasn't overwhelming. I enjoyed the pace of the course as well. I would recommend this course for future students. The content was beneficial for students I will teach in the future as well. | this course for future students. The | Content | was beneficial for students I will | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This is a nice introduction to social media marketing with professional insight from Randy Hlavac. I felt the content was a little too basic though. | from Randy Hlavac. I felt the | Content | was a little too basic though. | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | the professor was a little bit dry and repetitive but otherwise the content was interesting! | dry and repetitive but otherwise the | Content | was interesting! | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I would like more content from this module. It was very slow to take off, especially week one. It was easy and enjoyable though. I would have liked it to be more challenging. | I would like more | Content | from this module. It was very | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good introduction. But it feels like it is not complete. It is not much without the other courses so you either take the entire specialization or the benefits are not that big :( I feel like the specialization courses are an artificial break to a real university class... if the university class had only the content from those videos, that would not be enough. | the university class had only the | Content | from those videos, that would not | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| KRl9hpiaEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Okay, you know how to take some good photos but It would be interesting if you could edit some pictures to emphasize or change their content. That's post-production and it's the content of this course. I really recommend everyone to enroll it! | pictures to emphasize or change their | Content | That's post-production and it's the content | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| KRl9hpiaEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Okay, you know how to take some good photos but It would be interesting if you could edit some pictures to emphasize or change their content. That's post-production and it's the content of this course. I really recommend everyone to enroll it! | content. That's post-production and it's the | Content | of this course. I really recommend | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| KRl9hpiaEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | I love the corse! The content is wonderful! Thank you! | I love the corse! The | Content | is wonderful! Thank you! | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| kvco9XQ4EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | I highly recommend this course for those who want to learn content marketing. | for those who want to learn | Content | marketing. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| kvco9XQ4EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Interesting and helpful content. Thanks！ | Interesting and helpful | Content | Thanks！ | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| kvco9XQ4EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | I did not find this course as good as the other parts of the specialisation. There were some interesting elements there but also a lot of redundancy. I don't feel like I now have all the tools I need to do a through, structured content marketing analysis. | need to do a through, structured | Content | marketing analysis. | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| kvco9XQ4EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Overall the course gives a general and broad perspective of content | a general and broad perspective of | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| kvco9XQ4EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Great content and ideas. Thank you. | Great | Content | and ideas. Thank you. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| Kz1Vwnd_EeWKsgrp3VnvAw | Excellent content, inspiring teachers | Excellent | Content | inspiring teachers | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| KzTkolCEEeWxCwowHhzTpQ | Excellent structure, information content, and suggestions. Useful and interesting. | Excellent structure, information | Content | and suggestions. Useful and interesting. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| L7stsPOKEeSlpiIAC7NwBA | I did all four courses - the whole specialization. Each course in itself was aright and I learned new things. However, the course certificate is meaningless. It neither states the content nor the effort (for example the hours). Instead, it even says "non-credit course". This is despite the fact that the course equates "35 PDU's" and "counts towards the UCI Project Management Certificate Programm"; as it was described in the FAQ. I feel betrayed. How can I apply with such a meaningless peace of paper anywhere? | is meaningless. It neither states the | Content | nor the effort (for example the | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| L7stsPOKEeSlpiIAC7NwBA | The course contents is delivered in a very easy to understand manner. | The course | Content | is delivered in a very easy | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| L7stsPOKEeSlpiIAC7NwBA | Great lectures. I have also accomplished the certification from Adelaide University, however, found this one better in terms of course content and explanation. | one better in terms of course | Content | and explanation. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| L7stsPOKEeSlpiIAC7NwBA | The Course content is matured and well explained. | The Course | Content | is matured and well explained. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| L7stsPOKEeSlpiIAC7NwBA | The course content is quite elaborate and very detailed. Assignments and explanation,quiz was all excellent. | The course | Content | is quite elaborate and very detailed. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| LcLAGMEVEeWvUhLEBd1H9w | I really enjoyed the content of this course. It has been very helpful in my development as a musical artist. | I really enjoyed the | Content | of this course. It has been | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| lf2q-R6UEeSzvSIAC0KYCQ | Clearly great content and multimedia in this course, and the story-telling method was very much enjoyable. 5 out of 5! | Clearly great | Content | and multimedia in this course, and | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| lf2q-R6UEeSzvSIAC0KYCQ | Nice course, it's content is highly tied to it's title. It gives you an overview over the US presidents since JFK not only him, also some information before he took the leadership. You can finish it in 5 days or less ! | Nice course, it's | Content | is highly tied to it's title. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Course had a good content and the exercises were able to make the use of the elements | Course had a good | Content | and the exercises were able to | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Wonderfull tips and content to introduce in the HTML, CSS, Javascript | Wonderfull tips and | Content | to introduce in the HTML, CSS, | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I afraid to learn JS until take this course. Course has really good presentation and content to understand behaviour between HTML, CSS and JS. I would definitely recommend to take this course if you are interested in web development. | Course has really good presentation and | Content | to understand behaviour between HTML, CSS | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Fun to follow, light hearted, but with substantial content, that will help you web development career. | follow, light hearted, but with substantial | Content | that will help you web development | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The content was too basic, but good | The | Content | was too basic, but good | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Gives a great overview, though a bit more depth and content would have been great. Still, overall a great course for beginners! | though a bit more depth and | Content | would have been great. Still, overall | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Nicely organized contents. Good work with assignments. | Nicely organized | Content | Good work with assignments. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | great content. | great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Reasonable contents. Focus on very useful knowledge. Perfect for beginners. | Reasonable | Content | Focus on very useful knowledge. Perfect | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | everything has been explained well the way of teaching the content everything was good | well the way of teaching the | Content | everything was good | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very poor CSS content | Very poor CSS | Content | | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Well done. Focuses mainly on videos to teach the content with an assignment at the end of the week that uses everything you learned. I would rate 5 stars if it had more quizzes or exercises to do before the week's assignment. At any rate you learn a lot about Html, css, and JS and it's a worthy class in this specialization. | mainly on videos to teach the | Content | with an assignment at the end | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The professor really needs to make the course more exciting - you don't need to be educated to know enthusiasm promotes content reception. | be educated to know enthusiasm promotes | Content | reception. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Nice videos, nice content... incredible didactic! Coursera recommend a little knowledge from students, however you can learn web development concepts by zero! Recommended! | Nice videos, nice | Content | . . incredible didactic! Coursera recommend | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very simple way to teach the content. | Very simple way to teach the | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very nice presentation and content for beginners | very nice presentation and | Content | for beginners | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A bit too simple for my liking. And too many repeated content. But overall a good course for an absolute beginner. | my liking. And too many repeated | Content | But overall a good course for | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good content easy to learn. | very good | Content | easy to learn. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | clear and good example but limited contents | clear and good example but limited | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I liked the content, the way of teaching and most importantly everything is managed. | I liked the | Content | the way of teaching and most | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Content is good enough for beginners in web development but must have previously programming experience. The assignments are very strong and help understanding more. I think this is a good start point but some other operation on images and styles not covered. | | Content | is good enough for beginners in | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The course is very useful as a starting point in developing skills as a web developer. The videos are very well structured: not to long and the content is very handy as your guide when doing the assignments. The teacher does an excellent job: he is very clear, systematic and sometimes funny, too. Highly recommended. | structured: not to long and the | Content | is very handy as your guide | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The course content is well designed and full material (PDFs and HTML files) is openly shared. The best part is assignments, there are challenging and awesome. I am glad that I took this course. | The course | Content | is well designed and full material | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I am satisfied with the course content. It gave me a great opportunity to learn programs and also a great step forward in web programming. | I am satisfied with the course | Content | It gave me a great opportunity | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Amazing presentation. Good content | Amazing presentation. Good | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent course! Content is easy to comprehend and flexible. Professor is good having clear communication. I highly recommend this course for the beginners or if you want to refresh theses skills. | Excellent course! | Content | is easy to comprehend and flexible. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Content is good but can include more advanced topics in Javascript like various patterns eg IIFE, Module etc. Also, I reckon there should have been some material on Javascript classes,objects etc. As a whole this tutorial is excellent but could have been even better wit above topics included in detail. | | Content | is good but can include more | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Lecturer explains very well. Content very well sequenced | Lecturer explains very well. | Content | very well sequenced | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course provides load of information to get beginners started. The course content and assignments are also challenging enough for me understand the concepts. However the videos are a bit long so it's easy to get distracted. I'd recommend who take this course to take a glimpse at the assignment first, then come back and watch the videos, you'll have better focus on what you want to learn from there. | to get beginners started. The course | Content | and assignments are also challenging enough | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great instructor with great presentation methods that make learning course content simple and straight forward. Would recommend to anyone needing to get web basics into their toolbox of skills. | presentation methods that make learning course | Content | simple and straight forward. Would recommend | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Really liked it, Professor Rossiter was very thorough at explaining the content. Would recommend if I was starting to learn Web design/development. | was very thorough at explaining the | Content | Would recommend if I was starting | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Brilliant content! | Brilliant | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great set of lessons, covers the specifics and important main things of each of the topics. But I must say that several time the evaluation is a little too hard given the content of the course (talking about quis and projects) and that also is a lot of ground to cover. | a little too hard given the | Content | of the course (talking about quis | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This is a very good introductive course. It's easy to follow, it's explicative and offers extra resources to complement the contents and deep. | offers extra resources to complement the | Content | and deep. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This is THE BEST course I have ever taken on coursera or else. Very simple but effective, complex things are made bit simple to learn. Just in 3 weeks, covered a good contents. Specially the way of teaching was bit simple but outstanding. Pleasure to be a part of this course | in 3 weeks, covered a good | Content | Specially the way of teaching was | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The course is very complete. The lecturer explains very well. He presents the contents in a nice way and he always give good examples to accomplish the subjects. I definitely recommend this course! | explains very well. He presents the | Content | in a nice way and he | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good content and very well taught. | Very good | Content | and very well taught. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| lHabnht2EeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | The course is just great! All the contents are presented in a pretty pleasant way and concepts are clearly explained shortly and exemplified. Participants are supposed to learn through practice, resulting in very challenging and encouraging experiences. | course is just great! All the | Content | are presented in a pretty pleasant | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| lHabnht2EeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | I really enjoyed this course. Although I wish there had been more practices to instill the firm knowledge of what the content was. Computer flashcards, or even extra little quizzes in each lesson would have been nice. Other than that, great course, great teacher, and great content! Thank you! | the firm knowledge of what the | Content | was. Computer flashcards, or even extra | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| lHabnht2EeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | I really enjoyed this course. Although I wish there had been more practices to instill the firm knowledge of what the content was. Computer flashcards, or even extra little quizzes in each lesson would have been nice. Other than that, great course, great teacher, and great content! Thank you! | great course, great teacher, and great | Content | Thank you! | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| lHabnht2EeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | Great teacher and great content BUT I just wish that it would have been more abundant with information. it seemed for times maybe too short. | Great teacher and great | Content | BUT I just wish that it | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| loAmvxJgEea8fxLSgUgxeQ | The course content is not update with the latest software that is used in the course. In addition there is a lot of default setting that is changed making it harder to know which setting to use to get the same result as in the tests. | The course | Content | is not update with the latest | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| loAmvxJgEea8fxLSgUgxeQ | The contents are very interesting, however some assignments are a little confusing. | The | Content | are very interesting, however some assignments | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| LrTP0yv9EeWccAqzeA4VPw | I do love the content of this course, however I do wish we saw more scenarios play out when trying to get a point across. This course is just harder to obtain for me memory wise. | I do love the | Content | of this course, however I do | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| LTwsxXPTEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | I found this course to be outstanding, in terms of: Interest, inspiration, technical content, stimulating new ideas, learning from other course participants, and general enjoyment. | in terms of: Interest, inspiration, technical | Content | stimulating new ideas, learning from other | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| lUcQU1MNEeSstCIAC1GOZw | Calling this a course is a stretch. It would even be a stretch to call it a workshop. Course material is thin and you can go through it in a couple of hours. If you squeeze the content, you can probably get a couple of pages of notes out of it. Having said that, it is somehow useful, if you don't already have a system in place that works for you. I would only recommend this course to someone with a serious personal management issue. | of hours. If you squeeze the | Content | you can probably get a couple | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| lUcQU1MNEeSstCIAC1GOZw | I teach online rather than in the classroom, but the course content and strategies helped me to better organization my teaching, especially using my Google calendar, reminders and tasks. I am more in control of my daily work schedule and feel comfortable that I am accomplishing what I need to do and not overlooking important tasks. | in the classroom, but the course | Content | and strategies helped me to better | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| LWzwe3KxEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | Excellent course content with in-depth evaluation that is effective at replacing face-to-face teaching. | Excellent course | Content | with in-depth evaluation that is effective | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| lXG8rtQ9EeS4NCIAC7KEDw | Very interesting, high scientific content, topics are progressives and lead to a good comprehension of the physical phenomenon on going. Exercices are a good complement to the main lecture. Experiment captured in video were a very good surprise. | Very interesting, high scientific | Content | topics are progressives and lead to | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| lXNlz0B0EeWKOBLv1z6n9w | The presentation and content of lectures were compelling, motivating and disturbing. Very well done. No one really responded on the forums. This may have been because of small class size. In other classes I have taken on coursera the forums are quite active, and an instructor weighs in from time to time to answer questions or be present. Assignments were peer graded, so much was gained from reading other students interpretation of the material. I suggest putting the additional reading lists at the end of each unit, or in a separate side bar. They were hard to find in the syllabus. Overall an extremely worthwhile course. | The presentation and | Content | of lectures were compelling, motivating and | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| lYw3nxuGEeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | Amazing content and great material to study | Amazing | Content | and great material to study | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| lYw3nxuGEeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | Teacher is very clear and the course contents are very good. This course is highly recommendable to any who is interested in crypto. | is very clear and the course | Content | are very good. This course is | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| lYw3nxuGEeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | I love the pace of the course. The content and narration is crisp and informative. Exactly what i was looking for. I loved the initial brush up sessions on discrete probability. | the pace of the course. The | Content | and narration is crisp and informative. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| m0Du-7_DEeWn-wqIckNy5Q | The content is very really clear and well organized. | The | Content | is very really clear and well | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| M0etLDe9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Well explained content, though at times the presentation felt a little slow. Solid coding assignments that do a good job of reenforcing the course materials. A couple small topics weren't explained clearly but overall it's been a very informative class. Thanks for the knowledge! | Well explained | Content | though at times the presentation felt | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| M7W0H9_dEeS2ayIAC7NlsA | Dear Dra. Barbara, I'm really glad for has been done this course. The content is extremely helpful and your methodology show me the true way of learning. | has been done this course. The | Content | is extremely helpful and your methodology | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| M9dntkEoEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | The course content is good. But it needs some polishing... Major comment: The assignment submission/review process should be improved. Grading system is not clearly defined at the time of submission. Some grading question are inherently subjective "Is the code at least somewhat efficient?". But even for inherently objective questions "Is the code correct?" (as does it give the correct answer" the staff does not provide the correct answer... I think the staff should create some automated review for what is objective: does the code compile? does it yield the correct answer? is it efficient enough? (Just like many other courses on Coursera) And only when it passes the automatic review, use peer grading for coding style. Finally there a lot of confusion with the deadlines. Minor comments: Lucky Coursera has an option to play twice faster! Not that the content is too easy, but the talking ... pace ... is ... hum... very ... ... slow. Also how come for a programming course the slides with code are so poorly formated??? | The course | Content | is good. But it needs some | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| M9dntkEoEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | The course content is good. But it needs some polishing... Major comment: The assignment submission/review process should be improved. Grading system is not clearly defined at the time of submission. Some grading question are inherently subjective "Is the code at least somewhat efficient?". But even for inherently objective questions "Is the code correct?" (as does it give the correct answer" the staff does not provide the correct answer... I think the staff should create some automated review for what is objective: does the code compile? does it yield the correct answer? is it efficient enough? (Just like many other courses on Coursera) And only when it passes the automatic review, use peer grading for coding style. Finally there a lot of confusion with the deadlines. Minor comments: Lucky Coursera has an option to play twice faster! Not that the content is too easy, but the talking ... pace ... is ... hum... very ... ... slow. Also how come for a programming course the slides with code are so poorly formated??? | play twice faster! Not that the | Content | is too easy, but the talking | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| M9dntkEoEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Very good course, the content is great and well organized. The slides with code are a bit of an embarrassment for the University of California. The code is presented on what looks like a power point slide with bullets so the formatting and alignment is totally messed up, and then there are no shortage of typo's and code errors. But, the material is very good and Ira Pohl does an excellent job presenting it. All in all a great course and exactly what I was looking for. | Very good course, the | Content | is great and well organized. The | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| M9dntkEoEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Explanation is really Good. Contents could be more elaborate. | Explanation is really Good. | Content | could be more elaborate. | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| maX993EhEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Unfortunately, didn`t enjoy this course at all. I have gone through 7 courses on Coursera and finished them with the biggest pleasure and great results. This time I had to leave the course before finishing because: 1st: content is organized awfully (for example "HTML overview" - I knew all the material so I have an idea how it should look like, but lecturer started from the middle of all concepts, than moved to the beginning and together it looked like an unlinked content. I have simply lost a logic inside this. 2nd: Very difficult to get an idea: lecturer doesn`t try to simplify the content, even opposite - I had a feeling, that he makes easy things complicated for a reason. My husbend is a programmer with 10 years experience and when he watched the lecture he said, that even for him it was difficult to understand all the thing (things he actually knows). All these terms used, no relevant examples, too complex words and so on - I lost concentration, I had to google a lot of unknown terms, I had to stop lecture every 30 seconds to reread or repeat the peace of lecture, because I could not understand it. As I mentioned, I know HTML well, but it was described so complex, that it was difficult to link my actual knowledge to lecturer words. 3rd: not international student friendly. Use of complex words in places where they were not necessary, complex structures, too fast language... I am pretty good in English, but had to stop video and to google translate some "smart" words lecturer used without particular need - I don`t mean definitions, just some epithets to make his speech "smarter". I completed Coursera specialization by Michigan University and it was completely easy with plain text, short sentences, so well made for international student. 4th: this is boring. I am sorry, but this is true. I am interested in all these questions, but for some reasons I lose my attention every time. Maybe the reason is in all points I have just mentioned, but I didn`t enjoy this course at all and it was the first time I didn`t enjoy something connected with web app development. Please, don`t be mad at me - lecturer is a very charming and charismatic person, but I simply don`t like how the material is presented. 5th: I have a feeling like all slides are taken from some scientific books and lecturer reads comments from some science articles, it is not like described with own words, simplified for better comprehension, cleared with own real-life examples and in atmosphere of friendly conversation with some emotions and humor. Please, take my feedback just as my personal opinion and hope other students will enjoy it more. | the course before finishing because: 1st: | Content | is organized awfully (for example " | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| maX993EhEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Unfortunately, didn`t enjoy this course at all. I have gone through 7 courses on Coursera and finished them with the biggest pleasure and great results. This time I had to leave the course before finishing because: 1st: content is organized awfully (for example "HTML overview" - I knew all the material so I have an idea how it should look like, but lecturer started from the middle of all concepts, than moved to the beginning and together it looked like an unlinked content. I have simply lost a logic inside this. 2nd: Very difficult to get an idea: lecturer doesn`t try to simplify the content, even opposite - I had a feeling, that he makes easy things complicated for a reason. My husbend is a programmer with 10 years experience and when he watched the lecture he said, that even for him it was difficult to understand all the thing (things he actually knows). All these terms used, no relevant examples, too complex words and so on - I lost concentration, I had to google a lot of unknown terms, I had to stop lecture every 30 seconds to reread or repeat the peace of lecture, because I could not understand it. As I mentioned, I know HTML well, but it was described so complex, that it was difficult to link my actual knowledge to lecturer words. 3rd: not international student friendly. Use of complex words in places where they were not necessary, complex structures, too fast language... I am pretty good in English, but had to stop video and to google translate some "smart" words lecturer used without particular need - I don`t mean definitions, just some epithets to make his speech "smarter". I completed Coursera specialization by Michigan University and it was completely easy with plain text, short sentences, so well made for international student. 4th: this is boring. I am sorry, but this is true. I am interested in all these questions, but for some reasons I lose my attention every time. Maybe the reason is in all points I have just mentioned, but I didn`t enjoy this course at all and it was the first time I didn`t enjoy something connected with web app development. Please, don`t be mad at me - lecturer is a very charming and charismatic person, but I simply don`t like how the material is presented. 5th: I have a feeling like all slides are taken from some scientific books and lecturer reads comments from some science articles, it is not like described with own words, simplified for better comprehension, cleared with own real-life examples and in atmosphere of friendly conversation with some emotions and humor. Please, take my feedback just as my personal opinion and hope other students will enjoy it more. | together it looked like an unlinked | Content | I have simply lost a logic | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| maX993EhEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Unfortunately, didn`t enjoy this course at all. I have gone through 7 courses on Coursera and finished them with the biggest pleasure and great results. This time I had to leave the course before finishing because: 1st: content is organized awfully (for example "HTML overview" - I knew all the material so I have an idea how it should look like, but lecturer started from the middle of all concepts, than moved to the beginning and together it looked like an unlinked content. I have simply lost a logic inside this. 2nd: Very difficult to get an idea: lecturer doesn`t try to simplify the content, even opposite - I had a feeling, that he makes easy things complicated for a reason. My husbend is a programmer with 10 years experience and when he watched the lecture he said, that even for him it was difficult to understand all the thing (things he actually knows). All these terms used, no relevant examples, too complex words and so on - I lost concentration, I had to google a lot of unknown terms, I had to stop lecture every 30 seconds to reread or repeat the peace of lecture, because I could not understand it. As I mentioned, I know HTML well, but it was described so complex, that it was difficult to link my actual knowledge to lecturer words. 3rd: not international student friendly. Use of complex words in places where they were not necessary, complex structures, too fast language... I am pretty good in English, but had to stop video and to google translate some "smart" words lecturer used without particular need - I don`t mean definitions, just some epithets to make his speech "smarter". I completed Coursera specialization by Michigan University and it was completely easy with plain text, short sentences, so well made for international student. 4th: this is boring. I am sorry, but this is true. I am interested in all these questions, but for some reasons I lose my attention every time. Maybe the reason is in all points I have just mentioned, but I didn`t enjoy this course at all and it was the first time I didn`t enjoy something connected with web app development. Please, don`t be mad at me - lecturer is a very charming and charismatic person, but I simply don`t like how the material is presented. 5th: I have a feeling like all slides are taken from some scientific books and lecturer reads comments from some science articles, it is not like described with own words, simplified for better comprehension, cleared with own real-life examples and in atmosphere of friendly conversation with some emotions and humor. Please, take my feedback just as my personal opinion and hope other students will enjoy it more. | lecturer doesn`t try to simplify the | Content | even opposite - I had a | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | The course has a very important content. But I believe that it could improve it's quality, develop better slides, the teacher could be more dynamic. Other features like innovative assignments based on real life, partnerships with companies to provide content, and everything that could be a differential to the course will be awesome. | The course has a very important | Content | But I believe that it could | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | The course has a very important content. But I believe that it could improve it's quality, develop better slides, the teacher could be more dynamic. Other features like innovative assignments based on real life, partnerships with companies to provide content, and everything that could be a differential to the course will be awesome. | life, partnerships with companies to provide | Content | and everything that could be a | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | The course is very interesting and challenging. Prof. Stone is detail-oriented and open-minded. The only thing that can be even better is the course content. For example: we learned about decision making styles. We mentioned majority, minority, expect, authority with input, etc. But prof. Stone didn't mention which of these is the most effective one. I think the course content can go into more details and more explanations. Overall, I really enjoyed studying with prof. Stone. | be even better is the course | Content | For example: we learned about decision | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | The course is very interesting and challenging. Prof. Stone is detail-oriented and open-minded. The only thing that can be even better is the course content. For example: we learned about decision making styles. We mentioned majority, minority, expect, authority with input, etc. But prof. Stone didn't mention which of these is the most effective one. I think the course content can go into more details and more explanations. Overall, I really enjoyed studying with prof. Stone. | effective one. I think the course | Content | can go into more details and | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | Usefull but simple, would recommend to include a more in-depth content in future updates | recommend to include a more in-depth | Content | in future updates | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | The content is quite interesting ,but the professor was lacking luster . | The | Content | is quite interesting , but the | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| MEgKOpw3EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | Excellent content, in-depth compared to may other MOOCs. The instructors have organized the lectures very well and shown some useful and practical methods that can be implemented at various stages. | Excellent | Content | in-depth compared to may other MOOCs. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| MEgKOpw3EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | Great course! The content was produced very well. The course offers the slides as PDFs & makes other materials available for download as well. The information was extremely good & informative. I say this as someone who has taken multiple business classes already on entrepreneurship, as well as reading several books, & listening to many podcasts. The only things I would suggest as improvements are to in some of the optional content interviews at the end of the course it appears that they used a stereo recording which seems great but is a pain when you listen with headphones. You'll have only one headphone speaker with any sound. Also it would be great if the optional audio recordings at the end would be available for download or some other method. | Great course! The | Content | was produced very well. The course | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| MEgKOpw3EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | Great course! The content was produced very well. The course offers the slides as PDFs & makes other materials available for download as well. The information was extremely good & informative. I say this as someone who has taken multiple business classes already on entrepreneurship, as well as reading several books, & listening to many podcasts. The only things I would suggest as improvements are to in some of the optional content interviews at the end of the course it appears that they used a stereo recording which seems great but is a pain when you listen with headphones. You'll have only one headphone speaker with any sound. Also it would be great if the optional audio recordings at the end would be available for download or some other method. | to in some of the optional | Content | interviews at the end of the | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| MEgKOpw3EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | Great content, And the faculty is up to the mark | Great | Content | And the faculty is up to | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| MEgKOpw3EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | The content is great, and the teachers are awesome. Very glad I could learn from them | The | Content | is great, and the teachers are | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| MEgKOpw3EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | Good course. I did find the quizes not as challenging as the Marketing and Accounting courses I took through Wharton/ Coursera. Sometimes it seems some of the Professors talk very quickly as opposed to the Core MBA offerings. Overall, great content. Thank you! | the Core MBA offerings. Overall, great | Content | Thank you! | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| MEgKOpw3EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | Very good course, amazing content. | Very good course, amazing | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| MEgKOpw3EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | Good course. But the content is very less.You should include some readings and longer videos.Thank you everyone. | Good course. But the | Content | is very less. You should include | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| MEgKOpw3EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | Overall, this was an excellent course and, for the beginner, a great foray into general entrepreneurship concepts and ideas. Here's why I say that: 1) The professors offering the course are apparently top-notch - they all have extensive and varied experiences with entrepreneurship, and many of them have published research and reports that can be found with a quick google search. 2) The amount and nature of the content make it so that it's easy to approach the course more like a workshop, than some static didactic. For example, one of Ethan Mollick's talks comes with a spreadsheet to help students think a little more concretely and specifically about their ventures. 3) The course passed no judgement on push vs. pull ventures; they really tried to highlight the advantages and disadvantages of each. With the business community's surge in interest in design-thinking, I had been under the false impression that a push venture, by definition, was inferior. I gave 4 instead of 5 stars, however, because I feel that more attention could have been devoted to more service-oriented or product and service hybrid businesses (though the professors didn't totally ignore the service-oriented business). Also, I was under the impression that the professors would have some degree of real-time interaction with students (although I get that they are super busy), or that even if the professors themselves couldn't respond, that a teacher's assistant or representative would comment on questions raised about the course content. Again, this is overall a fantastic course, though not perfect - I would still highly recommend it to anyone thinking about entrepreneurship! | The amount and nature of the | Content | make it so that it's easy | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| MEgKOpw3EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | Overall, this was an excellent course and, for the beginner, a great foray into general entrepreneurship concepts and ideas. Here's why I say that: 1) The professors offering the course are apparently top-notch - they all have extensive and varied experiences with entrepreneurship, and many of them have published research and reports that can be found with a quick google search. 2) The amount and nature of the content make it so that it's easy to approach the course more like a workshop, than some static didactic. For example, one of Ethan Mollick's talks comes with a spreadsheet to help students think a little more concretely and specifically about their ventures. 3) The course passed no judgement on push vs. pull ventures; they really tried to highlight the advantages and disadvantages of each. With the business community's surge in interest in design-thinking, I had been under the false impression that a push venture, by definition, was inferior. I gave 4 instead of 5 stars, however, because I feel that more attention could have been devoted to more service-oriented or product and service hybrid businesses (though the professors didn't totally ignore the service-oriented business). Also, I was under the impression that the professors would have some degree of real-time interaction with students (although I get that they are super busy), or that even if the professors themselves couldn't respond, that a teacher's assistant or representative would comment on questions raised about the course content. Again, this is overall a fantastic course, though not perfect - I would still highly recommend it to anyone thinking about entrepreneurship! | on questions raised about the course | Content | Again, this is overall a fantastic | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| meQ0ic9uEeWu4RLrx6VBYw | Not clear illustration， many problems are not directly related to the content covered. More importantly, it sucks! | are not directly related to the | Content | covered. More importantly, it sucks! | Negative | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| mG15ZhQ9EeWCWhKuhISYpw | While the lectures were good, this course had annoying issues, such as in-video questions asking us to refer to previously shown material (which isn't easy given the Coursera interface). A few assignment questions were also poorly formulated. The course would have really benefited from .pdf reference material, for review and elaboration of topics presented in lectures. At minimum, a list of relevant equations would have helped. The acoustics part of the content seemed somewhat sketchy and hand-wavy; the assumptions and limitations behind the rule-of-thumb equations and models presented weren't given much weight, so I wasn't able to get a good grasp of when they were relevant*. The electronics part was more reasonable, but still suffered from some over-simplification (for example, the model of guitar pickups didn't include magnetic hysteresis). All in all, the course was worth taking, but I think the material deserves more rigor. *All models are wrong. But some of them are useful. | helped. The acoustics part of the | Content | seemed somewhat sketchy and hand-wavy; the | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | Really enjoyable and with enough detailed information. I totally recommend this course to anyone interested in a good introduction to the field of astrobiology. Professor Cockell comunicates the contents clearly and makes you feel engaged. It was a wonderful learning experience. | of astrobiology. Professor Cockell comunicates the | Content | clearly and makes you feel engaged. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | I am really enjoying this course. The content is displayed clearly providing a good overview of what astrobiology is. | am really enjoying this course. The | Content | is displayed clearly providing a good | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | This course has been extremely helpful, captivating, and thoroughly enjoyable! I learned so much from this course, and it has only intensified my interest and curiosity for this field. PROS: -Oganization and structure of the content -Balanced in terms of duration, difficulty, etc. -Delivery of the instructor, who was very engaging and maintained interest throughout the course, and his personal interest and knowledge in this field was clearly evident. -The assignments were well weighted, relevant, and a good indicator of my understanding of the course content. CONS: -None! So thank you to the instructor, the institute, and everyone else involved in providing this wonderful course. I look forward to more in the future! | PROS: -Oganization and structure of the | Content | -Balanced in terms of duration, difficulty, | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | This course has been extremely helpful, captivating, and thoroughly enjoyable! I learned so much from this course, and it has only intensified my interest and curiosity for this field. PROS: -Oganization and structure of the content -Balanced in terms of duration, difficulty, etc. -Delivery of the instructor, who was very engaging and maintained interest throughout the course, and his personal interest and knowledge in this field was clearly evident. -The assignments were well weighted, relevant, and a good indicator of my understanding of the course content. CONS: -None! So thank you to the instructor, the institute, and everyone else involved in providing this wonderful course. I look forward to more in the future! | of my understanding of the course | Content | CONS: -None! So thank you to | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | Great content and learning experience. Informative and enjoyable course, great lecture presentations and support materials. | Great | Content | and learning experience. Informative and enjoyable | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | About the contents, I was expecting maybe less biological charge and a bit more about astronomy, but maybe that was my mistake. The teacher makes a great job, and I have been learning both astrobiology and English. About practicing English while studying another subject, I would like to appreciate the synchronizing of the subtitles, that were perfect. I totally recommend this course to anyone interesting in solar system, astronomy, biology and the search for extraterrestrial inteligence. | About the | Content | I was expecting maybe less biological | Negative | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | I really enjoyed this course. I felt like some of the videos from the first week were a little too long, I preferred the shorter ones, and there was a mix up where the second week ended up being due before the first week which threw me off a little but the content itself was very interesting and I'm glad I took part in it. | me off a little but the | Content | itself was very interesting and I'm | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | Really enjoyed this course. The videos were really interesting and full of facts and information. I would recommend anyone with an interest in the extra terrestrial or sci-fi to do this course. Some of the content will be a real eye opener to those looking to the sky for little green men!! | do this course. Some of the | Content | will be a real eye opener | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | I already knew a little on this subject prior to completing the course but found the content and the delivery very interesting and engaging. Thank you for making this available. | completing the course but found the | Content | and the delivery very interesting and | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | I thoroughly enjoyed this course. I thought the pace was just right, and the quizzes were just challenging enough to make me review the content more thoughtfully. Thank you for making this course accessible! | enough to make me review the | Content | more thoughtfully. Thank you for making | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| mGM6AmlPEeSdNiIACrbZkA | Solid content and a great foundation of different schools of thought on the topic. Interesting brain science that is fairly accessible even from someone who doesn't know much about the topic. Some lessons can be difficult to follow. | Solid | Content | and a great foundation of different | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| mGM6AmlPEeSdNiIACrbZkA | Excelent content | Excelent | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| mGM6AmlPEeSdNiIACrbZkA | Great lecturer, fascinating course content. Hoping for an intermediate program! | Great lecturer, fascinating course | Content | Hoping for an intermediate program! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| mGM6AmlPEeSdNiIACrbZkA | I have taken 3 weeks of this course already, and the content and rhythm of the course is excellent. I had read mainly about neuromarketing in the past, buy this introduction to neuroeconomics seems so far much more scientifically based than the commercial approach taken by most of neuromarketing experts. If you are looking for scientific evidence about the neuroscience behind decision making, take this course. The instructor’s Russian accent in English is a little disturbing at the beginning, but once you get used to it you just forget all about it and get immersed in this extremely exciting field. | of this course already, and the | Content | and rhythm of the course is | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| MiSSCJLtEeWiKgp3mpfjeQ | outstanding blend of the content.... | outstanding blend of the | Content | . . . | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| mKzzYp5YEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | Really Great, PDF and apps are captured with snapshots and explained in sort and crisp with diagram as compare to just sentences. Good for start up of android app development. Thanks to author and content creator to bring interest on this course. I recommended to all my team members and they also started this course | app development. Thanks to author and | Content | creator to bring interest on this | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| mKzzYp5YEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | The free version of the course is far more restricted than other courses I've taken, the content wasn't brilliant, and it wasn't really more advanced than other tutorials with far better presenters which can be found online for free | than other courses I've taken, the | Content | wasn't brilliant, and it wasn't really | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| MMnLaEEjEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Again a course with depth in content but the presentation of the course could improve , it seems a bit patchy and pre-reads would help. | Again a course with depth in | Content | but the presentation of the course | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| MMnLaEEjEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | The course tests are at times partially unrelated to the content of the lessons. In the test of Lesson 7 we are asked if removing jargon from an analysis makes the analysis clearer. This is never mentioned in the course. The question does not have a unique yes/no solution. It depends on the context, in particular on the audience of the analysis and report. If I'm talking to technical people who knows a lot about the topic jargon can be useful, on the other hand if jargon is not documented it can be confusing. How are we supposed to know this? This is just one example, but all the courses of the EDS specialisation had these issues. I don't know if it is a language barrier or what but I feel that I didn't have a chance to study more to get a better score. You either happen to have the same idea of the teacher or you don't, and this is not professional. | at times partially unrelated to the | Content | of the lessons. In the test | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| MMnLaEEjEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Brian, Jeff, and Roger: Thank you very much for all the data science courses, really great. I generally rate them 5 stars. But for this one, I'm giving 3 stars, not because the content is not good (it is; it provides good practical and experiential information), but rather because the material seems repetitive at times either within the same course or with topics in the other courses. Also, the sequencing and lectures seem sometime a bit disjointed. May I humbly suggest an idea: Integrate the key points of this course relating to real-world examples and the sharing of real-world experiences into one of the other courses. Thank you. Robert Al-Jaar, PhD robert.aljaar@rassociates.biz | giving 3 stars, not because the | Content | is not good (it is; it | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| MMnLaEEjEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | The video quality and content were good. Unfortunately, there were a lot of spelling errors and grammatical mistakes in the written portions. | The video quality and | Content | were good. Unfortunately, there were a | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| mnCMltWCEeWFqw71fuUDrw | Very interesting content! | Very interesting | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| mnCMltWCEeWFqw71fuUDrw | This course is amazing! The content is great and the delivery even better. I thoroughly enjoyed the 5 weeks of learning | This course is amazing! The | Content | is great and the delivery even | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| mqcQFm6vEeWJ-wrnmCvZZw | Visuals were not great. Content was a bit irrelevant | Visuals were not great. | Content | was a bit irrelevant | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | I'm changing my review: This course has great content and the teacher does a great job in explaining the correct pronunciation! | my review: This course has great | Content | and the teacher does a great | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Excellent beginners course in Mandarin. The teacher introduces new words using pinyin in each 3-4 minute lesson and the content is reviewed in a quiz. The content is limited to reading and pronouncing pinyin words, which is perfectly acceptable to me since I'm supplementing this course with other in person classes. I love the 4 minute classes 4 times per week, since I never felt like I'm so far behind the deadlines that I can't catch up. | each 3-4 minute lesson and the | Content | is reviewed in a quiz. The | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Excellent beginners course in Mandarin. The teacher introduces new words using pinyin in each 3-4 minute lesson and the content is reviewed in a quiz. The content is limited to reading and pronouncing pinyin words, which is perfectly acceptable to me since I'm supplementing this course with other in person classes. I love the 4 minute classes 4 times per week, since I never felt like I'm so far behind the deadlines that I can't catch up. | is reviewed in a quiz. The | Content | is limited to reading and pronouncing | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Quizes got glitchy however, overall content is fantastic!!! (Wouldnt recomend taking for certification... better suited for fun ;) | Quizes got glitchy however, overall | Content | is fantastic! ! ! (Wouldnt recomend | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Great method and instructor. I am going to keep going with learning Mandarin. Very pleased with the content and structure of the course. | learning Mandarin. Very pleased with the | Content | and structure of the course. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Very solid content, with distinct sections and themes. No writing makes it into a good introductory course but also is something more serious learners need to study on their own alongside the course. | Very solid | Content | with distinct sections and themes. No | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Ni Hao, I liked the course, good course content though the first week which includes the tones was tough as it is hard to memorize the same. But as English phrase says, "try try till you succeed"or keeping trying till you succeed.So we have to keep trying the tones till we succeed. Would like to thank the Professor for the video lectures. XieXie | I liked the course, good course | Content | though the first week which includes | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | "Chinese for Beginners" is the best online resource I have found for learning a language. Professor Xiaoyu Liu's presentations are clear and easy to follow. Lectures build on content presented previously. The quizzes provide immediate feedback. The features that I found particularly helpful was the ability to pause after hearing a word, phrase, or sentence the professor said so I could repeat it several times before resuming the lecture. I also appreciated being able to repeat the quizzes as one way of reviewing the material. I hope that Peking University offers another online course for those who have completed "Chinese for Beginners." | easy to follow. Lectures build on | Content | presented previously. The quizzes provide immediate | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| mUSYT5noEeWqkw5zNB248Q | Four stars because the content is good. Not five stars because the english is not so good and for a non-english expert it can be difficult to understand, and the subtitle contains quite often errors. | Four stars because the | Content | is good. Not five stars because | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Exquisite course. A lot of content was covered quite thoroughly. | Exquisite course. A lot of | Content | was covered quite thoroughly. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good course content but it can be very difficult to get help if you are stuck on something. | Good course | Content | but it can be very difficult | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Started a little slow, and it may seem repetitive if you see all videos from one week in one day, otherwise I feel it has a good pace.The content was interesting and well explained. | it has a good pace. The | Content | was interesting and well explained. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Great content and very well instructions | Great | Content | and very well instructions | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This course start from problems. So this great to motivate the content and let student know why. However, there are lot of confusion questions that lead to miss understand the exercise problems. | So this great to motivate the | Content | and let student know why. However, | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Really Nice contents! | Really Nice | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Course has covered regression in sufficient details and gave practical aspect of it. Thanks to Emily for very good content and teaching | Thanks to Emily for very good | Content | and teaching | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Exceptionally well organized, fun and full of useful content. Bravo to the course organizers! | organized, fun and full of useful | Content | Bravo to the course organizers! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | I liked pretty much all of the content. The lectures are detailed. The assignments helped me understand the techniques used in regression. The step by step approach is great. What I dislike a bit is the promotion of proprietary and expensive Graphlab software. | liked pretty much all of the | Content | The lectures are detailed. The assignments | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Excellent, the materials and contents of this class are well organized, algorithms packed is for me to get started with Regression. | Excellent, the materials and | Content | of this class are well organized, | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Can't praise enough! This IS THE COURSE for regression. Cannot believe I didn't stumble upon it earlier enough. Great Specialization, Great Course, Great Professors, Great thought provoking Quizzes and assignments, helpful mentors and more important that any of the above, amazing comprehensive content covering each and every topic from simple linear regression to feature selection and going all the way to kNN Regression. An enjoyable and great learning experience. Hope to carry on the same level of enthusiasm through the rest of the specialization. Thank You Emily, Carlos, Johan (mentor) and rest of my classmates. And of course, Thank You Coursera. | any of the above, amazing comprehensive | Content | covering each and every topic from | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | I saw a number of machine courses that are with too general contents and more like conference presentations. It's hard to learn and grasp something from them. However this is a real Machine Course that provides informative, appropriate details and derivations from which I can learn and understand the meaning and insights buried in math symbols and equations. No doubt, the optional video lectures are excellent enhanced "nutrition." Looking forward to the three courses in this specialization. Thanks, Profs. Emily Fox and Carlos Guestrin, for instructing such wonderful authentic courses. | courses that are with too general | Content | and more like conference presentations. It's | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | To start with, I have been dedicating time to improve my understanding and depth in statistics and calculus. The reason is that, I am totally impressed by the lecture videos. The videos are detail, precise and covers enough depth. It has helped me to correlate the statistical concepts and application areas and rekindled my interest to go back to learn and strengthen my basics. I like the contents that its not a overdose of many mathematical equations. Appreciate the pains taken by the expert professors in explaining every detail possible to make the course more interesting. Appreciate the mention about the topics not covered in the course. My suggestion is to include a seperate section for each course with a list of reference books, topics and weblinks of material to increase our depth and breadth of technical understanding of the statistical methods. Many Thanks to Emily Fox and Carles Guestrin for their time and efforts in making this specialization course, and of course providing us with the free license to use Dato for learning purposes. | strengthen my basics. I like the | Content | that its not a overdose of | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Absolutely loved the way Emily tackled the course content - the knowledge I gained regarding LASSO & RIdge was something even I wasn't expecting. Also the optional video helped a lot to understand the mathematics better as compared to a mechanical write-down of the steps | the way Emily tackled the course | Content | - the knowledge I gained regarding | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very responsible teachers and practical classes content.You can not only learning the ML theory from scratch,but also learn to implement the algorithm using python by yourself.This is the best ML course I ever seen. Thanks for the teachers' hard-work.You are great! | Very responsible teachers and practical classes | Content | You can not only learning the | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | (Beta-Test review) Status: Still on the first week. The content is an easy follow, though it might seem to be a slight difficulty for those without a heavy background in calculus. So far, all the links (to the downloadable csv's and ipynb files) work well. All the videos have no apparent bugs and/or problems. I would also suggest to have the slides available for download as in the previous module. I don't think writing over the animation is a bad thing as long as it's still understandable. As an aside, I suggest editing out the swallowing sound you might occasionally hear whenever either instructor is speaking. To some, it seems a bit off-putting. Great course, overall. Thanks, Marvin | Still on the first week. The | Content | is an easy follow, though it | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Really good professors Good content, well structured and presented | Really good professors Good | Content | well structured and presented | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | The course is well presented and the content is packed with information and great techniques to use in your work world and in everyday life. I really enjoyed the lectures and Scott DeRue, besides being a world leader in his field, is an engaging and personable speaker who brings the course to life. Despite the course being very engaging and worthwhile, I am dismayed that you cannot take the tests if you do not buy the certificate of completion option. I understand purchasing the Course Certificate and understand that it costs time and resources to put this course together. However, since the tests are scored by a computer, the developers are not doing any work for free if they allow test access and scoring to those who choose not to buy the certificate option. By barring the those people from taking the tests, the MOOC suddenly becomes not so open anymore. People often wonder how a process or a product gets from A to B where it goes from open access to access for a limited few. This, the little step of denying access to test taking in courses that purport to be open, is that first step. Once this take further hold, more and more course will become less and less open and the MOOC system becomes the MOC system of just being Massive Online Courses. Please maintain the spirit of the MOOC by allowing testing access to all learners, not just to those who pay for the certificate. Thank you. | course is well presented and the | Content | is packed with information and great | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | I heard about this course in a article on business insider. The in depth explanation provided as well as the related practical experiences makes it more interesting. Congratulations for the team for putting together such a good content . | for putting together such a good | Content | . | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Low on actionable content. Was looking for some specific tactics to use, but even though the course syllabus refers to tactical information on influencing people, it lacked any specificity to make it useful. | Low on actionable | Content | Was looking for some specific tactics | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Extremely useful content. | Extremely useful | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Great course! The course structure is clear and straightforward. The content is rich and also inspires me to think a lot. | structure is clear and straightforward. The | Content | is rich and also inspires me | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Amazing Course! Great influential instructors. Very good training content! | Great influential instructors. Very good training | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good concepts, very useful tips shared in this course. I reduced 1 star because, it has very less illustrations. Interactions, live examples could have been added in the content. Especially the video background is not good. It matters because, it's distracting while listening the class. | could have been added in the | Content | Especially the video background is not | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Instructor was great, course content lucid. All in all an excellent offering. | Instructor was great, course | Content | lucid. All in all an excellent | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Really good and useful content. Instructors offer a lot of real life examples. I probably will pursue the whole specialization! | Really good and useful | Content | Instructors offer a lot of real | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | I find the course content useful and well structured, but I'd wish to hear more example for the different tactics. A few things remained unclear to me. Still I am satisfied with the course and would totally recommend it! Thank you Maxim Sytch and Scott DeRue! | I find the course | Content | useful and well structured, but I'd | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | At the risk of sounding like a jerk and I am TRULY sorry for saying this but only gave this course 4 stars instead of 5 because of one of the professors, not the actual content. I actually feel like this course was GREAT, I just couldnt deal with one of the professors constant sucking of teeth or whatever in the videos and dragging out of everything. Information got repeated in different ways making everything longer and boring where I literally just kept forwarding the lessons. Besides my "ADD" with that one professor, I will have to admit, I loved this course. | of the professors, not the actual | Content | I actually feel like this course | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very good, the spelling is clear and easy to understand, even for who doesn't speak and/or listen in English and the content is awesome. | and/or listen in English and the | Content | is awesome. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Great insights, very useful contents. The assignments are a good addition to the lectures & quizzes - it makes it more interactive and "forces" you to think about the content more deeply and in relation to your own experiences. Geoffrey (The Netherlands) | Great insights, very useful | Content | The assignments are a good addition | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Great insights, very useful contents. The assignments are a good addition to the lectures & quizzes - it makes it more interactive and "forces" you to think about the content more deeply and in relation to your own experiences. Geoffrey (The Netherlands) | forces" you to think about the | Content | more deeply and in relation to | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | A very engaging and informative course. The content was well laid out and easy to follow. I enjoyed the assignments and would recommend the course as professional development for anyone in a leadership position in a large organisation. I have already recommended to 6 colleagues who have enrolled in the course (I must have influenced them!) :) | very engaging and informative course. The | Content | was well laid out and easy | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | The only reason I give 3 stars is because there were no pdf documents of the lectures. Being able to check back notes fast is important and very helpful and I can't see why they are not given. Other than that the course content was very interesting and fascinating. Well done on that!! | given. Other than that the course | Content | was very interesting and fascinating. Well | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Excellent content with examples. | Excellent | Content | with examples. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | First course I took with Coursera and University of Michigan. The content was well organized and easy to navigate, the presenters were exceptionally articulate, the resources were ideal for the assignments. | Coursera and University of Michigan. The | Content | was well organized and easy to | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | This course is quite elaborate and the course content and lectures are quite effective. | is quite elaborate and the course | Content | and lectures are quite effective. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Most useful content is the list of factors that influence us behind the scenes in our minds. Would prefer to have more content of that nature presented, since the concepts of power and how to use those behind the scenes influences seem fairly basic in comparison. I appreciated the succinct presentation of the material, as well. Please make your graphics/slides available. | Most useful | Content | is the list of factors that | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Most useful content is the list of factors that influence us behind the scenes in our minds. Would prefer to have more content of that nature presented, since the concepts of power and how to use those behind the scenes influences seem fairly basic in comparison. I appreciated the succinct presentation of the material, as well. Please make your graphics/slides available. | minds. Would prefer to have more | Content | of that nature presented, since the | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| n2zunIlgEeWSMw6QLoDNsQ | Very nicely taught. Well structured and content was very apt. A big thanks to coursera team. Extremely satisfied. :) | Very nicely taught. Well structured and | Content | was very apt. A big thanks | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| n2zunIlgEeWSMw6QLoDNsQ | Fantastic! Joe Warren and Scott Rixner hit one out of the ballpark with this course. They really make programming accessible to anyone with the way that they teach, and they make the content really fun. Yes, the material can be challenging at some times, but with all the lectures, homework and support, I truly think anyone can finish this course. I'm enrolled in the full specialization and a note to others. Enroll in all the courses at once and then in your enrollments page you can adjust the sessions that you want to take by hitting the three dots button. I made the mistake of waiting till I finished part one to enroll in the next course and it caused me to skip a session so I had to sit around waiting for two weeks until the next session started. Programming is a language so it helps the learning process to work on it every day, don't make the same mistake I made! | they teach, and they make the | Content | really fun. Yes, the material can | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| n2zunIlgEeWSMw6QLoDNsQ | An amazing course. Professors are knowledgeable, fun, and contribute time and effort to the course. The content is fast-paced, but you end up learning a lot! | and effort to the course. The | Content | is fast-paced, but you end up | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| n2zunIlgEeWSMw6QLoDNsQ | I wouldn't give a star for this course; materials are prosaic (wordy); professors have not designed a truly high-tech course with automated grading; they want peers to grade each other - I don't like this euphemism, which is equivalent to the blind leading the blind; I do not want to spend my energy correcting other peoples' programming assignments; I want to spend the time thinking about programming and working on my own programs - the concept of collaboration is false - everyone wants to develop their own stuff not share with others so the premise of the course is inaccurate; also, the course has many long-winded texts of little use to the student; this is a course more about indoctrination in a legacy system than it is a course to liberate the mind through computers; while the content is interesting I am completely turned off by the amount of time I have to devote to commenting on other peoples' stuff - I am not a teacher - that is the teacher's job not my job - also, I do not like the condescension and clownishness of the profs in this course - I do not need to be entertained and all the talk about Monty Python, one of the corniest programs on TV trivializes the material - a no-nonsense, MIT type course is preferable - this is a course that I would avoid from the logistical perspective, although I will follow the material side of the course because it has substantial content and that includes the specialization - hello teachers in the course - automate the grading and remove all of the peer evaluations and start offering authentic instruction, not lazy instruction of students teaching students - the approach is typical of all legacy-oriented courses - the same goes for the Severance course at the University of Michigan - if the Rice course is supposed to instill interest in Rice University, this offering turns me away from Rice because one realizes that Rice is too legacy-oriented in its approach, same old, same old. | the mind through computers; while the | Content | is interesting I am completely turned | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| n2zunIlgEeWSMw6QLoDNsQ | I wouldn't give a star for this course; materials are prosaic (wordy); professors have not designed a truly high-tech course with automated grading; they want peers to grade each other - I don't like this euphemism, which is equivalent to the blind leading the blind; I do not want to spend my energy correcting other peoples' programming assignments; I want to spend the time thinking about programming and working on my own programs - the concept of collaboration is false - everyone wants to develop their own stuff not share with others so the premise of the course is inaccurate; also, the course has many long-winded texts of little use to the student; this is a course more about indoctrination in a legacy system than it is a course to liberate the mind through computers; while the content is interesting I am completely turned off by the amount of time I have to devote to commenting on other peoples' stuff - I am not a teacher - that is the teacher's job not my job - also, I do not like the condescension and clownishness of the profs in this course - I do not need to be entertained and all the talk about Monty Python, one of the corniest programs on TV trivializes the material - a no-nonsense, MIT type course is preferable - this is a course that I would avoid from the logistical perspective, although I will follow the material side of the course because it has substantial content and that includes the specialization - hello teachers in the course - automate the grading and remove all of the peer evaluations and start offering authentic instruction, not lazy instruction of students teaching students - the approach is typical of all legacy-oriented courses - the same goes for the Severance course at the University of Michigan - if the Rice course is supposed to instill interest in Rice University, this offering turns me away from Rice because one realizes that Rice is too legacy-oriented in its approach, same old, same old. | the course because it has substantial | Content | and that includes the specialization - | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Very well structured, good choice of content. All video lectures are engaging and you can feel a lot of though was put into making algorithms explanations both clear and concise. Many thanks to the lecturers. | Very well structured, good choice of | Content | All video lectures are engaging and | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | I found the assignments challenging in the absolute best sense of the term, and therefore incredibly rewarding as well! Whenever I've gotten stuck, the answer was always in the course material somewhere, even if I didn't see it there at first. The discussion forums were extremely helpful, and I was astounded to see that that instructors were still actively monitoring the discussion forums and responding to student questions. I'm obviously not an expert in this field, but I've been an educator before, and my own impression of the assignments was that they were extremely well designed: it was impossible to pass them without knowing what you were doing, the tools to approach them were always found in the lectures, and the challenge problems pushed your knowledge even farther. I would recommend the specialization to everyone. Additionally, I noticed that the content aligns well with other DS&A syllabi I have seen in brick-and-mortar institutions, especially the first 3 or 4 courses. It's also a very nice luxury to be able to submit in Python. I have certainly learned a great deal. | everyone. Additionally, I noticed that the | Content | aligns well with other DS&A syllabi | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Really Useful Content. | Really Useful | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Strong Points: -Course content is well-organized -Good assignments that enhance the understanding of concepts Weak Points: -Some of the presenters need to strengthen their presentation skills -Lectures slides aren't good enough | Strong Points: -Course | Content | is well-organized -Good assignments that enhance | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Near the end it becomes a slosh to get through all the information covered in the last two weeks. It feels like you are given some hints and pointers on what to do, but for the most part, the last two weeks are being tossed in the deep end and hoping you learn how to swim. I want to give a 3.5 but that's not allowed. With the amount of content covered this course is closer to a 4 than a 3. | not allowed. With the amount of | Content | covered this course is closer to | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | The content covered in this course is great. However, I hope there was a more efficient way to communicate with student. I hope there is a way to bring student together like a group chat function in the coursera app. So, people who want to be more committed can communicate more often and effcient. | The | Content | covered in this course is great. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | First four weeks of the course were awesome,some exciting problems,insightful teaching but fifth week's content I felt were not up to the standards of first four weeks.Nonetheless it was great experience.Thank you instructors and course forum. | problems, insightful teaching but fifth week's | Content | I felt were not up to | Negative | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Very good content and great professors, I like the short duration of lectures and more emphasis on assignments.. | Very good | Content | and great professors, I like the | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | The course starts very promising, but it gets worse week after week, culminating on a barely understandable week about dynamic programming. That’s when I gave up and decided to write this review instead, with just one assignment missing to complete the course. Some of the teachers aren’t native english speakers, which is fine, but their english is very hard to understand. I found myself having to watch some portions of the videos over and over again in order to understand what was being said. I tried reading the transcripts instead, but the they’re even worse! It seems that they were automatically generated from the videos, thus suffering with the poor pronunciation. The teachers use mathematical sophistication that feels unnecessary, but to be fair, they do mention it on the FAQ as part of the necessary background. However, even though it’s an online course, they barely use any teaching method besides very raw slides, some dry mathematical proofs and someone speaking about the content. The only resources offered to help learning are a few open source visualizations. I expected much more. The only good aspect from this course are the assignment checkers, which allow you to write your solutions in multiple languages. I deeply regret the money and time I spent on this course. | proofs and someone speaking about the | Content | The only resources offered to help | Negative | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | the content if very good, but lecturers are terrible. you better read slides and read any book you like. watching their videos it wast of time. | the | Content | if very good, but lecturers are | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | good course with some very nice idea. I like the fact you can use a lot of languages for you programming assesment, the content is really helpful, I would like to have more indications from the grading system to save time. | languages for you programming assesment, the | Content | is really helpful, I would like | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| NCNTU5w4EeWNCwqI4rnUgw | superb course with interesting contents | superb course with interesting | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| NCNTU5w4EeWNCwqI4rnUgw | Please put more content. The content is very less. | Please put more | Content | The content is very less. | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| NCNTU5w4EeWNCwqI4rnUgw | Please put more content. The content is very less. | Please put more content. The | Content | is very less. | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| NDBJAUWDEeWbNhIvIryYow | Great content and interesting guest speakers! | Great | Content | and interesting guest speakers! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| NDBJAUWDEeWbNhIvIryYow | This is a fantastic course about the basics of Investment Management. While it is an introductory course, it does not shy away from some basic maths and includes some very interesting and instructive spreadsheet exercises. The quality of the presentations, subtitles and slides is outstanding. The quizzes are challenging but always within the content of the lectures. I strongly recommend this course to anybody interested in investment management who is not afraid of some basic maths. Moreover, I strongly encourage the team, that organised this MOOC, to create more specialized and in depth courses, maybe even a Specialization. | are challenging but always within the | Content | of the lectures. I strongly recommend | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Amazing course with very useful contents and hands on. | Amazing course with very useful | Content | and hands on. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Impressive and wonderful content. | Impressive and wonderful | Content | | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This course was an exceptional introduction to programming Java applications. The course content and project were both very practical and fun. | to programming Java applications. The course | Content | and project were both very practical | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This is a solid course. The videos are a bit low quality, and the API's used are sorta derpy, but the content is good. | used are sorta derpy, but the | Content | is good. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good beginner content, touches on some good foundations for java | Good beginner | Content | touches on some good foundations for | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Considering the contents of the second and third course, this was too basic. | Considering the | Content | of the second and third course, | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I like the content and programming assignments. | I like the | Content | and programming assignments. | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good course, ideal for the first half of a second course in computer science. A little java experience is recommended buy you'll probably be ok if you have program in a statically type programming language before because you can pick up java very quickly. The lectures are very good, I think that the teachers are excellent expositors but I feel that they could be more detailed. The project is about representing earthquakes in a map and you are always increasing the complexity. Finally you need to add your own extension which I found an excellent opportunity to test your imagination and your capacity to create new things. The only cons of the course for me is the way assignments are evaluated. I think it has to do with the fact that they are interactive. You have to answers questions in a Quiz related to the week content and the project. But the are not very demanding, therefore they do not reflect how much you really know. In general I recommend taking this course if you are in self study journey in computer science, even more the specialization start to get more interesting and demanding in the follow up courses, more complete and detailed. | a Quiz related to the week | Content | and the project. But the are | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The topics are covered perfectly in such a way that every learner can digest the content by spending some time on them. After that, learners can able to learn most of the basics of OOP. The homeworks are also well designed and helpful. Thanks to the creators of this course and the instructors. | that every learner can digest the | Content | by spending some time on them. | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | really explicit and easy to follow up, nice preparation and nice content. | follow up, nice preparation and nice | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Excellent contents! | Excellent | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | A good practical overview of Java language with good exercises that emphasize the course contents. | good exercises that emphasize the course | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Best at the current moment, considering the content and in comparison to the program being offered by other mooc's | at the current moment, considering the | Content | and in comparison to the program | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Just Completed 1 week , awesome content and lectures , best | Just Completed 1 week , awesome | Content | and lectures , best | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Well structured content and great explanation on concepts. I really like the concept challenge portion as it helps dig into the application of the concepts explained in the lecture. It would have been better if the lecture slides were available in pdfs. | Well structured | Content | and great explanation on concepts. I | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Excellent course with great content. The only problem is that there's a bit less administrative assistance in the discussion forums than perhaps preferable. Aside from that, this course was fun, and while some parts were strenuous, I enjoyed taking it! | Excellent course with great | Content | The only problem is that there's | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I really liked the structure of the course, and also the course contents. | the course, and also the course | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | The direction of the content is correct. First node and then his wrapper Express. | The direction of the | Content | is correct. First node and then | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Great content and teaching! Thanks Professor Muppala! | Great | Content | and teaching! Thanks Professor Muppala! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Great contents as the rest of the courses in the specialization. I'm afraid I need to be a little bit critical with this one though: 1) The contents are really jammed into 4 weeks - The last week's contents are actually some kind of miscellany between mongoose, https, authentication and BaaS 2) Not a single quiz or self-evaluation of sorts along the course - To be completely fair, the exercises shown along the way might make up for it. Still, I think it's important to spread some quizes around so as to make absorb the concepts more effectively 3) The quality of the presentations is somewhat lower than other courses. There's even a video towards the end of the course where a Linkedin notification springs up on top, which even makes the presenter pause for a few seconds. Don't get me wrong, I really enjoyed this course and definitely appreciate the effort put into it - Given the newly introduced Coursera fees, I'd expect much more quality in place to make it 70 buck-worth, though | Great | Content | as the rest of the courses | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Great contents as the rest of the courses in the specialization. I'm afraid I need to be a little bit critical with this one though: 1) The contents are really jammed into 4 weeks - The last week's contents are actually some kind of miscellany between mongoose, https, authentication and BaaS 2) Not a single quiz or self-evaluation of sorts along the course - To be completely fair, the exercises shown along the way might make up for it. Still, I think it's important to spread some quizes around so as to make absorb the concepts more effectively 3) The quality of the presentations is somewhat lower than other courses. There's even a video towards the end of the course where a Linkedin notification springs up on top, which even makes the presenter pause for a few seconds. Don't get me wrong, I really enjoyed this course and definitely appreciate the effort put into it - Given the newly introduced Coursera fees, I'd expect much more quality in place to make it 70 buck-worth, though | with this one though: 1) The | Content | are really jammed into 4 weeks | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Great contents as the rest of the courses in the specialization. I'm afraid I need to be a little bit critical with this one though: 1) The contents are really jammed into 4 weeks - The last week's contents are actually some kind of miscellany between mongoose, https, authentication and BaaS 2) Not a single quiz or self-evaluation of sorts along the course - To be completely fair, the exercises shown along the way might make up for it. Still, I think it's important to spread some quizes around so as to make absorb the concepts more effectively 3) The quality of the presentations is somewhat lower than other courses. There's even a video towards the end of the course where a Linkedin notification springs up on top, which even makes the presenter pause for a few seconds. Don't get me wrong, I really enjoyed this course and definitely appreciate the effort put into it - Given the newly introduced Coursera fees, I'd expect much more quality in place to make it 70 buck-worth, though | 4 weeks - The last week's | Content | are actually some kind of miscellany | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| NiK99anHEeS88iIAC1WehA | The content is well modularized, introduces a range of topic, but is much more of a discourse than an introduction to to process of evaluating a policy challenge. Not many tactical ideas, mostly a survey of the policy challenges that a new generation of policy-makers and new stakeholders will face. So the focus is not on "how" but it introduces Public Policy as a concept in a nice discursive way worthy of your time. | The | Content | is well modularized, introduces a range | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| NiK99anHEeS88iIAC1WehA | Excellent Course! But more content per week would have been better. | Excellent Course! But more | Content | per week would have been better. | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| NiK99anHEeS88iIAC1WehA | I am very pleased with the structure and content of this course. I have taken over a dozen clases on Coursera in the past year across a wide variety of disciplines and this is definitely one I am going to see through to the end. If you are interested in how public policy drive governments, corporations , and NGO's behaviour which in turn impacts directly upon individuals and entire populations, this is a great primer. Highly recommended. | very pleased with the structure and | Content | of this course. I have taken | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| NiK99anHEeS88iIAC1WehA | Speakers were great. But the content was very U.S related. | Speakers were great. But the | Content | was very U. S related. | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| NiK99anHEeS88iIAC1WehA | Excellent course content and guest speakers. One of its kind. | Excellent course | Content | and guest speakers. One of its | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| NiK99anHEeS88iIAC1WehA | Wonderful speakers! Prof Warburg was artful and generous in this curriculum with a great showcase of speakers, topics and richness of content.. I took as a review and refresher of US public policy and also wanting to know the most current issues/ conversations. The Frank Batten School and UVA were amazing, timely and thoughtful. Thank you!! | of speakers, topics and richness of | Content | . I took as a review | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| NjakpyWaEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Very good content. Really informative. | Very good | Content | Really informative. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| NjakpyWaEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Although this course is rich in content, it lacks a lot of perspective around The History of Graphic Design, since it only talks from the american point of view. | Although this course is rich in | Content | it lacks a lot of perspective | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| NjakpyWaEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Amazing class, very interesting in terms of content -you learn a lot about the History of Graphic Design- and a great reflection on graphic design today. The assignments were all clever and insightful. I really recommend it for anyone in the graphic design business, whether you're starting out or have been in the industry a while! | class, very interesting in terms of | Content | -you learn a lot about the | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| NjakpyWaEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Really great and thorough content. A wonderful introduction to the dense and exciting history of design. | Really great and thorough | Content | A wonderful introduction to the dense | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| NjakpyWaEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Excellent presentation, engaging content, interesting and relevant assignments and quizes. | Excellent presentation, engaging | Content | interesting and relevant assignments and quizes. | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| NjbaFTRfEeWLGgqjU3pHlw | All in all this was a very good course. Jeremy Ghez is a bright and inspiring teacher. The content of the course was extremely interesting and well put together. I would have certainly enjoyed to have some sections of the course expanded, which was my only disappointment. I thought the assignments were very well handled and def | a bright and inspiring teacher. The | Content | of the course was extremely interesting | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| nnd5lshWEeSA1yIACye2oA | Excellent class with good use of photographs and video. The professor was clear and interesting. Content was fascinating. | The professor was clear and interesting. | Content | was fascinating. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| nnd5lshWEeSA1yIACye2oA | Course content was nice. Delivery was good. Learn a lot that I have never been aware of. Course logistics was lacking. Hard to keep track where one was. Information about the course was sparse. | Course | Content | was nice. Delivery was good. Learn | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| NNe5CEW4EeW8ow5lHOiKYQ | From my perspective, the individual courses that made up the "Capstone" (people, customer, accounting, and operations analytics) were both educative and interactive. These individual courses contained data focused problems and gave a general overview of the specific field. However, the final "Capstone" project was entirely disappointing and something I even plan to complain to Coursera about. After having a two month delay, the course not only lacked any direction, but seemed to be put together last minute without any real thought or plan. The entire "Capstone" was driven by hypotheticals, almost all of which did not have any relevance to the past four courses. An educated individual could easily complete this "Capstone", without any knowledge whatsoever from the previous four courses. The "Capstone" provided a few articles and videos related to the issue (Yahoo Ad Blocker) to help us solve the problem, but clearly the course heavily lacked content. I was expecting the course to contain hypothetical data for us to interact with and predict how the Ad blocker problem and our proposed solutions would drive the data of Yahoo's business. However, the course merely was driven by complete hypotheticals that only required one to be educated about general business functions. This "Capstone" hardly related to the previous four courses, and it is a scam that this course cost $99. | but clearly the course heavily lacked | Content | I was expecting the course to | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| NpTR4zVwEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | My least favorite part of the course, but it was still put together well. Content just isn't as interesting as the rest of the specialization. Felt a bit too "Project Manager' instead of the Product Manager. | it was still put together well. | Content | just isn't as interesting as the | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| NpTR4zVwEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | One of the best coursers I have seen on Coursera so far. The video production quality, course structure and content is extra ordinary compared to other courses that I've seen so far. | video production quality, course structure and | Content | is extra ordinary compared to other | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| NpTR4zVwEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Very nice content and presented so nicely. Must read and highly recommended course for all managers and business analysts. | Very nice | Content | and presented so nicely. Must read | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| NpTR4zVwEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Excellent course and excellent content. | Excellent course and excellent | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| NpTR4zVwEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Nice course. Decent content and always well-structured lectures. The peer assignments could have been better though. | Nice course. Decent | Content | and always well-structured lectures. The peer | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very Neat Course Content with a textbook for learner to explore. | Very Neat Course | Content | with a textbook for learner to | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Nice introductory course. The speaker explains very well the content and is funny enough in order to catch our attention for the subject. | The speaker explains very well the | Content | and is funny enough in order | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I like the way instructor teaches and content is also helpful. | like the way instructor teaches and | Content | is also helpful. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | great content | great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I loved this course! Colleen made HTML accessible and enjoyable to learn - something I've been struggling to understand for a while. I highly recommend this course to anyone who has had either no exposure, or some exposure to HTML. It serves as a very solid foundation on which to build futher knowledge of the content. | to build futher knowledge of the | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I would have given this course 5 stars if not for the final exam, which is to look at a jpeg and then write code to make a web page look exactly like the jpeg. The issue is that there are many ways to get a page to look like the image and you will still fail the exam. The course creators have realized this and you now have supporting questions that you can pass the course on even if your page code is not validated as correct. In my opinion there are so many better ways this final exam could have been handled, for instance i would have like to have seen a few more questions in the exam, and once passed you could see a forum area open up for us all to paste our code in or link to a page where we could discuss with teachers and moderators etc. personally I believe that sort of approach would add more value. The above being said the content of the course is excellent for beginners with an eye opening focus on accessibility and good content on the DOM structure. The course will provide you with a good set of tools to get a basic page up on the internet. | value. The above being said the | Content | of the course is excellent for | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I would have given this course 5 stars if not for the final exam, which is to look at a jpeg and then write code to make a web page look exactly like the jpeg. The issue is that there are many ways to get a page to look like the image and you will still fail the exam. The course creators have realized this and you now have supporting questions that you can pass the course on even if your page code is not validated as correct. In my opinion there are so many better ways this final exam could have been handled, for instance i would have like to have seen a few more questions in the exam, and once passed you could see a forum area open up for us all to paste our code in or link to a page where we could discuss with teachers and moderators etc. personally I believe that sort of approach would add more value. The above being said the content of the course is excellent for beginners with an eye opening focus on accessibility and good content on the DOM structure. The course will provide you with a good set of tools to get a basic page up on the internet. | opening focus on accessibility and good | Content | on the DOM structure. The course | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This is, in my opinion, a very good introduction to HTML. The instructor is top notch and the delivery is very smooth. The content isn't too technical, starts a a very basic level without being too simplistic, builds up to an interesting final project, and the entire course can be mastered in just a few hours | the delivery is very smooth. The | Content | isn't too technical, starts a a | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Excellent course for beginners, with a very well structured content and an awesome instructor. | beginners, with a very well structured | Content | and an awesome instructor. | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | More interactive assignments using the parser would have been great. As it stands, the quizzes had mostly relevant content, but the lessons were anything but engaging. Having Colleen talk at the camera for 5-12 minutes per video got tedious really quick. | stands, the quizzes had mostly relevant | Content | but the lessons were anything but | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Really basic course, great for everyone who haven't seen or written any code in their whole life. Teacher is surely likeable and content is easy to follow even during busy, full of work week. It teaches mostly about tags and how to put them together in proper way. I really liked constant reminders about accessibility, that definitely helps with making good habits. | life. Teacher is surely likeable and | Content | is easy to follow even during | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very helpful for absolutely beginners. The content is well-organized and materials are carefully picked to provide concise, easy-to-read information for learners. Lectures are clear, well presented, just-right informative; accompanied by the great public speaking skill of the instructor, they are hence not intimidating or boring at all. Another plus point is the instructor constantly urging learners to go beyond "the passing point" and learn more on their own, which is a very key mindset to keep up with the fast, ever-changing landscape of Information Technologies. Don't feel lost or scared, since she'll provide you with great resources for further learning and references! | Very helpful for absolutely beginners. The | Content | is well-organized and materials are carefully | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I have been in the web dev field for almost a year. The intro says that this course is not for beginners, but I still took it, since I want to learn HTML systematically. My original plan was to skim through most contents and focuses on those I don't know before. This course goes beyond by expectation and is very useful to me. I feel getting systematic knowledge from it. In addition to the course content, the professor conducts the lecturers in a very clear way. I like her teaching style. | plan was to skim through most | Content | and focuses on those I don't | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I have been in the web dev field for almost a year. The intro says that this course is not for beginners, but I still took it, since I want to learn HTML systematically. My original plan was to skim through most contents and focuses on those I don't know before. This course goes beyond by expectation and is very useful to me. I feel getting systematic knowledge from it. In addition to the course content, the professor conducts the lecturers in a very clear way. I like her teaching style. | it. In addition to the course | Content | the professor conducts the lecturers in | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very well prepared content to get enough knowledge on basic HTML5. It definitely help the beginners to expand their knowledge on HTML5. | Very well prepared | Content | to get enough knowledge on basic | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This is an excellent course. This is worth your time and money. I highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in learning to make websites. The instructor is great and the content is of high quality. | The instructor is great and the | Content | is of high quality. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I'd give it a 3.5, but it's not possible so I'm leaning more towards a 4 than a 3. The most positive thing about the course was Prof. van Lent who really knows her stuff. She also has a calm, soothing manner of explaining things and moves with it at the right pace. The content was easy to follow and quizzes were useful. Final assignment was messed up and they really should fix that, but the additional eight questions were basically a transcript of the code itself, and if you did your own code, you shouldn't have had any problem distinguishing the bad code from the good one. Extra stuff for those who successfully finished the course was a nice touch. The real downside of it all was the 'staff'. I got my question answered nine days after I posted it, when I had already finished. I've also seen some rude and condescending yet sparse answers to other students. Similar (but worse) things happen in CSS3 course as well. I don't know who those people are and how they got their jobs, but they should be replaced. Or sent to professional conduct and time management class. | it at the right pace. The | Content | was easy to follow and quizzes | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Excellent intro to HTML. Colleen van Lent is awesome. I really enjoy her teaching style. The content is clear and interesting. | really enjoy her teaching style. The | Content | is clear and interesting. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Excellent course content and pace of the lectures. | Excellent course | Content | and pace of the lectures. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good lecturer and presentation. Some additional contents and details would be good, but this was a good start into HTML5 | Good lecturer and presentation. Some additional | Content | and details would be good, but | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Five stars for emphasis on accessibility, explanation and detail of semantic elements. Three stars for course content testing prior to publication and for omission of Linux. I use sftp on a command-line interface and did not learn in this course how to use mput for putting multiple HTML files and web assets onto my live site. There is no hyphen in "meta-data", nor are there two hyphens in "local area network. | semantic elements. Three stars for course | Content | testing prior to publication and for | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Great intro to the content! | Great intro to the | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Colleen is a great instructor and her slides work with well the content. Very helpful way to get a beginning | her slides work with well the | Content | Very helpful way to get a | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I have finished this course and it has great content. Almost all HTML5 Elements are explained well. It is great for beginners. | this course and it has great | Content | Almost all HTML5 Elements are explained | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very Good Course and contents. Colleen has explained every concept very deeply and descriptively. I have enjoyed the learning. | Very Good Course and | Content | Colleen has explained every concept very | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | It is a great course and the instructor has such a great way to teach that it's very easy to understand the content. Theres is only one thing left... more excercises. | it's very easy to understand the | Content | Theres is only one thing left. | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | great professor and content is easy. | great professor and | Content | is easy. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The class was good. The instructor is great and she is very knowledgeable. I just wish there were more content in the class. | I just wish there were more | Content | in the class. | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The course content was presented at steady pace and the videos were clear and direct. However, the auto-grader was really confusing for the final project. | The course | Content | was presented at steady pace and | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Amazing course! The instructor presents the contents in a very easy to follow way. | Amazing course! The instructor presents the | Content | in a very easy to follow | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This is a very "pediatric" way to learn HTML basics and how to get started on your developer career. Both content and examples are pretty straight forward. Evaluation system should be reviewed and interaction with teacher, other than blog, should be open when there's an issue/question with specific questions. | started on your developer career. Both | Content | and examples are pretty straight forward. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Could be the best course on HTML5, but autograder is a pure nightmare. There's a good chance to fail your final project because of technical issues. So, 5 stars for the content, 0 stars for the autograder, 3 stars as a final mark. | issues. So, 5 stars for the | Content | 0 stars for the autograder, 3 | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Excellent class. Video lectures are very accessible and good content. The automatic parser is a pain, and can be improved. I spent a lot of time to get code that was working and giving the correct output to pass the tests. | lectures are very accessible and good | Content | The automatic parser is a pain, | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Easy to follow, well explained content with a very nice lecturer. | Easy to follow, well explained | Content | with a very nice lecturer. | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| NSxhuc9cEeWczg7kSY_tVQ | Lots of readings! Would have loved a more engaging format. Also found the content slightly ambiguous, you might have to do some trial and error and might be surprised at the answers in the quiz. | more engaging format. Also found the | Content | slightly ambiguous, you might have to | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| NSxhuc9cEeWczg7kSY_tVQ | Basically not much content. The guest speaker uses unnecessarily weird examples in his talk. | Basically not much | Content | The guest speaker uses unnecessarily weird | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| NSxhuc9cEeWczg7kSY_tVQ | This is a great starter course/primer for behavioral finance! I would like to thank Dr Rasiel for the contents of this course. Recommendations for improvement: -Create a single sheet defining the biases contained in the course for easy reference. -Add more examples and retrospectives that explain the similarities and differences between the biases. Overall, I really enjoyed the course and look forward to additional courses on Behavioral Finance. | to thank Dr Rasiel for the | Content | of this course. Recommendations for improvement: | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| NSxhuc9cEeWczg7kSY_tVQ | It lacks of video lectures so I had to rely on notes only. The course's content is interesting and has potential to give learner more depth of topics. Hope it will be improved soon. | rely on notes only. The course's | Content | is interesting and has potential to | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| NSxhuc9cEeWczg7kSY_tVQ | I think this course is great as an introduction to behavioral finance, however I think the content lacks depth and is rather superficial. | behavioral finance, however I think the | Content | lacks depth and is rather superficial. | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| NSxhuc9cEeWczg7kSY_tVQ | The subject matter is good, but the course does not adequately explain behavioral finance concepts. Most of the course consists of slide decks to read. There is a dearth of video content. I expected better quality from a course provided through Duke University. | There is a dearth of video | Content | I expected better quality from a | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| NSxhuc9cEeWczg7kSY_tVQ | A different and interesting perspective to look in the field of finance. Content is little confusing and more of self study component, but overall it's worth. | look in the field of finance. | Content | is little confusing and more of | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| nUeuF3EkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | You can't introduce yourself to someone if you don't know who you are. This course does such a wonderful job of helping you accumulate the best of you, so that you can then present it to the rest of the world (more specifically in this case, your interviewers.) There are some lessons on English pronunciation, which I found a touch tedious since I'm a native speaker, but it's nothing that takes away from the overall class. Professor Duquette's can be felt through the videos. He is clear, relevant and charming as a speaker - you honestly enjoy watching and listening to the audio content. Highly recommended! | watching and listening to the audio | Content | Highly recommended! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| nUeuF3EkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | The content of the course is very good, but I guess there always are few people. My submission of assignments could not have been reviewed for a long time. | The | Content | of the course is very good, | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| nUm5Ry-iEeWUWxIOAnoaFQ | A very well designed and delivered course. I found it very useful, very well structured and the content was relevant and in the right amount of detail. Excellent course. | useful, very well structured and the | Content | was relevant and in the right | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| nUm5Ry-iEeWUWxIOAnoaFQ | fantastic graphics,clear content and concepts. | fantastic graphics, clear | Content | and concepts. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| nUm5Ry-iEeWUWxIOAnoaFQ | Perfect balance of content, teaching excellence. It has been very gratifying to take this course. | Perfect balance of | Content | teaching excellence. It has been very | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Nyq7nXzPEeWb-BLhFdaGww | this is a fabulous course with deep insight content as well as a professional team which is lead by an excellent professor, which could maximize the benefits for every students who want to explore the journey of the neuroscience. | a fabulous course with deep insight | Content | as well as a professional team | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Nyq7nXzPEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Wonderful. You need a lot of motivation beacuse it is full of (great) content, so the "lazy days" may come, but even if you fail to finish this course it is totally worth it. | beacuse it is full of (great) | Content | so the " lazy days" may | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Nyq7nXzPEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Absoultely Astoundishing. I will highlight the best points: There is a companion textbook. This really helps to consolidate knowledge and sear for new information, although I should say that the tutorials are much complete. There are tutorial notes given to the students. This is crucial. If one was to organize all the course content from just watching the videos it would be impossible. The tutorial notes give a great start for your own knowledge structuring. This course is no light thing. My impression from some of other MOOC sites is that they are much superficial. Their courses seem a good joke at simulating college level education. Medical neuroscience is not like that. You should expect a standard college level neuroscience course. Professor White is amazing. When you think he couldn't surprise you with his teaching methods, he plays music for you! It is better than going to classes. Trust me. I had a neuroscience course in university and I couldn't stad attending classes. I wouldn't have passed wasn't it for Medical Neuroscience. The course subject is just fascinating. Have you ever wondered that there are sensory labeled lines? Did you know that you cannot feel pain unless you have a specific receptor for it? Well, I don't know about you, but for me, that is simply magic. This course will really make you have smarter conversations. Have you wondered launching a neuroscience topic during your date? "Well, did you know that no one really precisely knows how we can see? yes, because what your eyes "see" is just a pattern of light, and it is inverted horizontally and laterally! This is simply the best course I have ever attended What are you waiting for? | was to organize all the course | Content | from just watching the videos it | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Nyq7nXzPEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Really great content and teacher, and also really challenging. Hard work needed to succeed, but it's really worth it ! Recommend it for all person interested in understanding how the brain (and all the superior brain functions such as memory, cognition, emotions...) works. | Really great | Content | and teacher, and also really challenging. | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| NZmNZlzAEeW3Vw7jVMSMiw | Though at a high level but I did like the contents and the deliver format which is easy to understand. | level but I did like the | Content | and the deliver format which is | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| O6SzVx2GEeSKwCIACzUCbQ | While course uses a genie method for presentation the content, Quizzes are just made to accomplish one goal: to make sure you have memorized every small detail haven said in the course. Even if someone memorizes the details like specific names and dates, for how long he/she is going to keep it in mind? 2 days? On week? | a genie method for presentation the | Content | Quizzes are just made to accomplish | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| O6SzVx2GEeSKwCIACzUCbQ | I truly enjoyed the content as well as the format of this class. While the pace was very swift, it was apparent that a lot of thought was put into developing this course. I feel like I've gained a quality education on the basic introductory information to Communication Science. The Little Box of Nuances inspire me to further explore this subject. | I truly enjoyed the | Content | as well as the format of | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| O6SzVx2GEeSKwCIACzUCbQ | great learning experience! The content was well designed and examples during the lecture really helped me to understand the theory a lot. The structure of this course was very clear. I have learnt some knowledge on communication before, but this course really helped me to get a better understand on the topic and to reorganized all my knowlege on communication logically. Thanks a lot to all those who contributed to this great MOOC course! | great learning experience! The | Content | was well designed and examples during | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| o7P0ctXYEeWFqw71fuUDrw | Fantastic teacher, amazingly well-prepared contents. It's incredible that they are doing this for free. | Fantastic teacher, amazingly well-prepared | Content | It's incredible that they are doing | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| O941HzsyEeWjyxInT4zYJQ | The course was nicely prepared and structured, in my opinion it lacked a bit of content compared to the rest of the specialization. But it's a good rounding up of everything we learned before. | opinion it lacked a bit of | Content | compared to the rest of the | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| O941HzsyEeWjyxInT4zYJQ | This is a course almost without any content. You coul pick any book about game design and you will learn more of game design in the first ten pages. I recommend Level up! by Scott Rogers for begginers like me. You could be fooled by this course if you dont know the principles of design and narrative structure, but if you know it you will not find anything of value here, becouse dont explain almost anything about videogame concepts like gameplay, balace, GAME DESIGN, etc. They explain very basics things in the first course and then they forget everything. The rest of the information are very very basic knowledge about character and world design, without being vinculated through metodologies to the games!, only with empty words of inspiration recorded in useles videos. Sorry the critics, but i followed all the courses and paid the monoey for the certificate, hoping that some week the course could show somethign usefull. Never did. See for books if you want to learn something. | is a course almost without any | Content | You coul pick any book about | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Fantastic topic intro and well delivered content make this course a must learn ! | Fantastic topic intro and well delivered | Content | make this course a must learn | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | It looks a good course from its contents. | looks a good course from its | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Excellent! But need more examples and situations for the respective concepts. The level of difficulty shall be increased so that students will grasp more of the content! Thanks | students will grasp more of the | Content | Thanks | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Content presented clear, direct and modern. Contemporaneous references and examples help to support and assimilate the content. | | Content | presented clear, direct and modern. Contemporaneous | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Content presented clear, direct and modern. Contemporaneous references and examples help to support and assimilate the content. | help to support and assimilate the | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | A bit light in terms of content, this probably could have been condensed down into 2 lessons. | A bit light in terms of | Content | this probably could have been condensed | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | The case studies are interesting. The course content is interesting, and the "history" of strategy is a very good point of view to start. The capstone project is a real project, that requires 3-4 hours if done properly. | case studies are interesting. The course | Content | is interesting, and the " history" | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | This is a highly recommended course and the content is second to no other on Coursera at the time of this review. I have taken all of the courses in the series from Copenhagen Business School, as well as nearly all other business management courses offered for other institutions. This specific course on Strategic Management is the single most informative and current material of all of the options. It does not answer every question or address every concept you would need to know to run a major corporation, but it is a fantastic overview of past and present methods of business strategy, and is of value to any business minded individual. I highly recommend this course and the entire series from CBS. Enjoy! | a highly recommended course and the | Content | is second to no other on | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | This happens to be my first e-certification course. I am very much pleased with with course content and delivery of the same. The videos are really effective and successfully communicated the concepts. The learnings are immense and I hope to enrol for many more valued courses in future. These are really really great learnings and irrespective of the fact whether the industry accept the certifications or not, it is always important for the individual's learning curve. | very much pleased with with course | Content | and delivery of the same. The | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | The structure and content of the course is excellent. The further reading materials provided by the lecturer are impressive and go deep within the subject matter of the course. | The structure and | Content | of the course is excellent. The | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | very cool content! | very cool | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Content is great. The final project pier feedback/grading could be upgraded. Prefer only one person reviewing in depth than 3 using multiple choice questions. Scales might work better. | | Content | is great. The final project pier | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Wonderful course with very clear and precise information, extremely well explained making easy to understand every single topic. I guess they used lots of strategy experience into how to transfer knowledge. Thank you very much for the high quality content. | very much for the high quality | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | I just loved it. Excellent the professor, excellent the project, the content, the videos, I would like to take classes with the professor, is very calmed, and explained so well! Congrats | the professor, excellent the project, the | Content | the videos, I would like to | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Excellent content. | Excellent | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Great content. | Great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Really enjoyed the content of this course | Really enjoyed the | Content | of this course | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Great Course the english is very well spoken, the literature is very well distributed along the course, the examples are really clear and you can learn on your own pace. I strongly recommend this course for business students, and entrepreneurs. The Capstone project is quit challenging to make you think outside the box, and really encourage you to use all of the features you have learned along the course. Plus the teacher is really clear within the knowledge that is being spread and the content of the course is very current, and can help you open your mind for new ideas. | that is being spread and the | Content | of the course is very current, | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | I thank you for so interesting content. | I thank you for so interesting | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| ODnbKv_6EeSa0SIACyGBQw | It's very informative in terms of content while interesting with the speaker's personal style. | It's very informative in terms of | Content | while interesting with the speaker's personal | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| ODnbKv_6EeSa0SIACyGBQw | Excellent content, very good explanation, interesting lectures. Though | Excellent | Content | very good explanation, interesting lectures. Though | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| ODnbKv_6EeSa0SIACyGBQw | I absolutely loved the course content and the style of the instructor. The only feedback I'd extend is more variety in the writing assignment prompts, and a little more specificity in the quiz wording. Some of the questions seemed phrased in an unclear way. | I absolutely loved the course | Content | and the style of the instructor. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| ODnbKv_6EeSa0SIACyGBQw | I've not finished this course yet, but I found it to be excellent, the content is important to understand, the teacher is clear and I enjoy listening to him. I really recommend it. | found it to be excellent, the | Content | is important to understand, the teacher | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| ofcUj5MCEeWI6BJRAK7IKQ | I really enjoyed this course and found it very enjoyable. The content itself is a bit old but still perfectly relevant. Looking forward to Part 2. | and found it very enjoyable. The | Content | itself is a bit old but | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| ofcUj5MCEeWI6BJRAK7IKQ | Very nice content and very well explained. Examples are good too. | Very nice | Content | and very well explained. Examples are | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| ofcUj5MCEeWI6BJRAK7IKQ | very good content. | very good | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| ofcUj5MCEeWI6BJRAK7IKQ | One of the most valuable an interesting courses I have ever joined. The contents are precise and accurate. It forces students to practice what they learned in an effective way. It's very clear from the beginning to whom this course if for. In other words, it does not claim that it target all users just to gain popularity. Objectives are very clear and honest. In conclusion, for those who meet the course requirements and search for what this course is teaching, this course is AWESOME. | courses I have ever joined. The | Content | are precise and accurate. It forces | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| OFscqWDPEeWFnw4rjmRYKQ | excellent content & treatment with thought provoking videos & transcripts | excellent | Content | & treatment with thought provoking videos | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| OFscqWDPEeWFnw4rjmRYKQ | Great breadth and depth of content! Thanks | Great breadth and depth of | Content | Thanks | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| olJcuUKiEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | The worst Coursera course I have taken. Total waste of time. The lectures are boring and have no real content. The supplementary materials are good though. | are boring and have no real | Content | The supplementary materials are good though. | Negative | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | content is not good, too scattered content, cannot find focus. assignments are meaningless. | | Content | is not good, too scattered content, | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | content is not good, too scattered content, cannot find focus. assignments are meaningless. | content is not good, too scattered | Content | cannot find focus. assignments are meaningless. | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | I found this course to be excellent. I really enjoyed the content and learned so very much. My only criticism is not of the course content but simply the nature of the course. I am currently working full time and doing a Masters degree part time, and I did this on top of that, so I found the work load to be exceptionally heavy. Not a problem for someone who isn't working though. Superb course - thank you. | be excellent. I really enjoyed the | Content | and learned so very much. My | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | I found this course to be excellent. I really enjoyed the content and learned so very much. My only criticism is not of the course content but simply the nature of the course. I am currently working full time and doing a Masters degree part time, and I did this on top of that, so I found the work load to be exceptionally heavy. Not a problem for someone who isn't working though. Superb course - thank you. | criticism is not of the course | Content | but simply the nature of the | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Very enthusiastic lecturer, which made learning that much more enjoyable! The course content is fantastic. My only comment is the grading system for the assignments / how the assignments are designed - in my opinion the grading system could be improved to reflect efforts and correct submission done by students. | that much more enjoyable! The course | Content | is fantastic. My only comment is | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | The content and material were really good, interesting and challenging. I wanted to thank you very much for this really great introductory course. | The | Content | and material were really good, interesting | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | it was a lot of work and there were some errors and issues, esp. trouble with peer review. the professor was dynamic and encouraging. content and most activities were very helpful. | the professor was dynamic and encouraging. | Content | and most activities were very helpful. | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Great content, very relevant to business problems | Great | Content | very relevant to business problems | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Very helpful, very professional staff and content. | Very helpful, very professional staff and | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | A very well laid out structured learning program. Course pace & content is great & triggers enough thinking during the course assignment. I recommend the course to all those who want to bring in structure to thinking & innovation | structured learning program. Course pace & | Content | is great & triggers enough thinking | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | I can't say I really enjoyed this 5 week course. The flow itself was more like "food for thought" where a bunch of ideas are presented as sort of an intellectual gymnastics exercise with no point really. By week 5 you are just plain bored. The content wasn't concise enough. It could have easily been a 4 week course or even shorter had they not tried to belabor each topic. It all was too high level and never really got down enough to earth. I have done other courses on the same topic which were better put together. | you are just plain bored. The | Content | wasn't concise enough. It could have | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Interesting approach, content & delivery. Sound examples & study material. | Interesting approach, | Content | & delivery. Sound examples & study | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Very good introduction to design thinking. Provides some useful tools that I have already used in my personal and professional projects and will continue to use in the future. Every video lesson was well done and tied the overall theme into the content well. Highly recommended! | tied the overall theme into the | Content | well. Highly recommended! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | One of the best courses I have ever attended. I am really impressed with the presentation of the content and the creativity of delivering the ideas. I have purchased the book "GROWTH" from Amazon, to add on what I've already learned in a deeper manner. Thank you, Thuraya Al Souli | impressed with the presentation of the | Content | and the creativity of delivering the | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | I found the course useful as an overview into the process of design thinking. The content was delivered in an engaging manner and the examples and case studies were memorable. | the process of design thinking. The | Content | was delivered in an engaging manner | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Content is fairly good with weak story line and connection across the various modules. Also the lack of in session quiz modules or weekly quiz module to re-inforce learning is disappointing. It's also possible that i was expecting a lot from a course on design thinking and what it turned out to be was just a scratching of the surface of what the definition of Design Thinking is all about. Having read numerous books on Lean Thinking, Agile development, Minimum Viable Propositions, etc. I was really expecting a solid rigorous approach to the world of design thinking. This course let me down and I just managed to scrape through at the end...almost gave up. | | Content | is fairly good with weak story | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Great content! | Great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | One of the best courses I have taken from Coursera. The professor and the team involved in this course are great. Highly value added content. | course are great. Highly value added | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Great content and instructors! | Great | Content | and instructors! | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | A very interesting course, with lots of good content. I am excited to learn more now about design thinking. The video featuring Dr. Hess was hilarious! I would love to take a course with him! | interesting course, with lots of good | Content | I am excited to learn more | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | The course is pretty uneventful. I have done some courses from other universities, which are more interactive and fun. But the content is great! | more interactive and fun. But the | Content | is great! | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| op_vMOGiEeWr4g7T_DyXNw | Great, and highly relevant/topical, content. However I found the quiz assignments to be needlessly tedious at times. | Great, and highly relevant/topical, | Content | However I found the quiz assignments | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| op_vMOGiEeWr4g7T_DyXNw | The course teaches a lot of core concepts of distributed systems (clouds included). The content is well delivered and the homework reflects the material very well. The homework is appropriately tough. There is an optional programming assignment for setting up a distributed network of nodes with failure detection. I learned a lot about gossip based information spreading while doing the exercise. That said, the assignment is not clearly explained and it is hard to get started. Overall I did enjoy the course and learned a great deal. | of distributed systems (clouds included). The | Content | is well delivered and the homework | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| op_vMOGiEeWr4g7T_DyXNw | Great Course! A little more contents regarding the Programming Assignment would have made it even better. I'd like to thank the entire Team for making this wonderful course. :) | Great Course! A little more | Content | regarding the Programming Assignment would have | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| op_vMOGiEeWr4g7T_DyXNw | I enjoyed the contents and homeworks. Overall the delivery was very good, and I have grasped a lot. The main reason that I won't give 5 stars is the program assignment. I have spent and wasted 3 weeks to work on the tools, yes, tools, not the subject matter. Course should clearly indicate that the assignment only works in Linux/UNIX environment, and need to further test the scripts in most popular Linux OS platforms, different c++ versions, and different python versions. | I enjoyed the | Content | and homeworks. Overall the delivery was | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| op_vMOGiEeWr4g7T_DyXNw | Very well taught, easy to understand. The questions in the exams have been very thoughtfully selected, one must pay attention to the content and understand the concept. Going to remember the concepts for long time after watching & listing the tutorials. | one must pay attention to the | Content | and understand the concept. Going to | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| op_vMOGiEeWr4g7T_DyXNw | a very good course for cloud study. the content is colorful , a lot of examples to support deep understanding of the concepts. The biggest drawback is that maybe there can be some small programming assignment after each week's course. And the standard answers of the Week5 quizz have some bugs. | good course for cloud study. the | Content | is colorful , a lot of | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| op_vMOGiEeWr4g7T_DyXNw | The material is covered in depth and clearly, the content is very current while still covering the historic origins and the development of the current state fo the art. It comes with evaluations that are not aimed towards memorization, but rather towards understanding the subject. As a cherry on top, they allow you to take a verified certificate towards credit on the Masters degree. | covered in depth and clearly, the | Content | is very current while still covering | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Great content and very motivated instructor. | Great | Content | and very motivated instructor. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | great instructor, all the content was presented very clear and surely i learn a lot from it. Ten weeks is kinda long but there is a lot of interesting information. escential for law students | great instructor, all the | Content | was presented very clear and surely | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Superb content and delivery | Superb | Content | and delivery | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | I am extremely happy with the course contents as this is exactlywhat I was looking for. I am sure that I would be immensely benefitted post completion of the course. | am extremely happy with the course | Content | as this is exactlywhat I was | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Dr. McGarrity was inspirational and extremely funny. His delivery of the material was excellent. Perfect combination of good content and great course leader presentation. Very detailed and relevant, with great examples. (The only suggestion would be to share more examples of others speakers, besides political) All sessions were valuable. The course was comprehensive and interesting. Thank you very much for putting this content together. Cheers from Brazil, Carla Romano | was excellent. Perfect combination of good | Content | and great course leader presentation. Very | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Dr. McGarrity was inspirational and extremely funny. His delivery of the material was excellent. Perfect combination of good content and great course leader presentation. Very detailed and relevant, with great examples. (The only suggestion would be to share more examples of others speakers, besides political) All sessions were valuable. The course was comprehensive and interesting. Thank you very much for putting this content together. Cheers from Brazil, Carla Romano | you very much for putting this | Content | together. Cheers from Brazil, Carla Romano | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Oh my goooodness ! I'm thrilled for what i've just accomplish so far. first, i've been listening and paying attention to many speeches. from civil right mouvement era to niwadays campaign and any other political, social, educational,... presntations. either in french (my first language) or in english. the only thing I cared about was the content, ant perhaps the delivery but it never cross my mind to analyse as i'm capable today. This is fantastic! Great work, Demba | thing I cared about was the | Content | ant perhaps the delivery but it | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | The course certainly helps in professional and regular activities. Practicing the content develops a confidence that improves performance in any situation. | professional and regular activities. Practicing the | Content | develops a confidence that improves performance | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | this lecture is in a very good structure and practicial. i like the way professor deliveries the contents. It's acttrictive and the language is easy to understand. Also, the examples explaine the concept well. It;s really awsome! | like the way professor deliveries the | Content | It's acttrictive and the language is | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | It appeared to be a very good course for me. Not only the content is good (may be for some students it will seem quite obvious - not for me, actually), but the tutor itself is kind of role model of a person who is good at public speaking. I think even just watching the videos without doing any exercises will increase the watchers' public speaking skills. | course for me. Not only the | Content | is good (may be for some | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Awesome instructor. The content was very useful and interesting. | Awesome instructor. The | Content | was very useful and interesting. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | so many things to learn from this material. The content, delivery and design allow everybody to improve our public speaking skills | to learn from this material. The | Content | delivery and design allow everybody to | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Great!!!! The content, the teacher, all of it!!!! | Great! ! ! ! The | Content | the teacher, all of it! ! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Excellent content and funny lecturer! | Excellent | Content | and funny lecturer! | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| oSAFEslDEeWCSBJ1_yk7Tw | Compared to other courses in the specification, this course content is too shallow and brief. | courses in the specification, this course | Content | is too shallow and brief. | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| ow4CDdJIEeS9RyIACzUXlQ | Heavy contents.. Unable to cover a week's material in a week | Heavy | Content | . Unable to cover a week's | Negative | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | This is very good and I would recommend it, but it is quite short compared to other Coursera courses that I have paid for. I think they should add more content for the price they are charging. | I think they should add more | Content | for the price they are charging. | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | The explanations and the topics covered are very much useful for the professionals to implement in the day to day work.Thanks for such a wonderful contents. | work. Thanks for such a wonderful | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Could have more in depth content, a bit shallow sometimes. | Could have more in depth | Content | a bit shallow sometimes. | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Good and practical course with very applicable content. | and practical course with very applicable | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | I learned a lot with this course, but there are not so many exercises for students to train the content learned. The lectures are very good. | exercises for students to train the | Content | learned. The lectures are very good. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Besides the course free fee, the content is meaningful and worth studying. Thanks. | Besides the course free fee, the | Content | is meaningful and worth studying. Thanks. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Excellent content, as it is concise and clear. | Excellent | Content | as it is concise and clear. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Poor content. Clearly filler material for the specialization. :) | Poor | Content | Clearly filler material for the specialization. | Negative | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | The course was very short and very basic. I do not think it is fair to call it "High-Impact Business Writing" when all you get is an introduction to business writing. It would be nice to have a more extensive course on this subject. I would retake it if it was improved. My rating reflects the lack of high-quality content with more examples. | rating reflects the lack of high-quality | Content | with more examples. | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Some lessons were a bit obvious, but lots of good content overall. | bit obvious, but lots of good | Content | overall. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| o_VGekEUEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Interesting content. Engaging instructor. | Interesting | Content | Engaging instructor. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| o_VGekEUEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Good content, but odd mashing of video presentations. B | Good | Content | but odd mashing of video presentations. | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | After also learning R from a non-Coursera MOOC, I find this Coursera course clunky and distractingly esoteric. Coursera occasionally crashes when attempting to parse or record the Python code that I've written, when that code runs fine on a regular IDE. This course in particular also includes lots of optional content that is either unnecessary (The Best Taco in the World video, for example) or for which it is unclear how to apply to Python (An interview with the inventor of JQuery, for example). Additionally, the instructor often assigns variable names that don't explain what the variable represents, which makes the videos a bit harder to follow than necessary. Despite all of this, I have learned a lot from this course. | particular also includes lots of optional | Content | that is either unnecessary (The Best | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The course is an introduction to the absolute basics of python. Programming assignments are not very challenging and the course could benefit by adding more content and challenging tasks for those who wish to challenge themselves. | course could benefit by adding more | Content | and challenging tasks for those who | Positive | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | This second Python course included more complex assignments and much more interesting content than the first part of it. I strongly recommend it for those, who interested in computer programming! | complex assignments and much more interesting | Content | than the first part of it. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I really love the way Dr Chuck is teaching. It is incredibly clear and you never get bored even if each lecture is over 20 minutes long. After each lecture you do feel like you've become an expert in that topic. However, the course is very diluted.... Only 4-5 lectures over 7 weeks is too little content, especially if you are to pay the $79 required for certification. Each week contains a lot of videos that, although being interesting, are not directly relevant to the course. I finished the whole thing in 2 days ^^ | over 7 weeks is too little | Content | especially if you are to pay | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The content is very clearly explained. | The | Content | is very clearly explained. | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I rated this class 5/5 because the instruction, content, resources, and pacing are all excellent, and this course is true to its description. Highly recommended for anyone who has taken Python for Everybody (Getting Started in Python). These two courses are a best match for someone learning their first programming language. Learning with Professor Severance is fun, in bite-sized pieces, and with just enough challenge to keep you engaged and moving forward without getting discouraged. Professor Severance has mastered teaching programming at scale. Thank you! | this class 5/5 because the instruction, | Content | resources, and pacing are all excellent, | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Engaging, simplified content (easy to understand concepts and functions) | Engaging, simplified | Content | (easy to understand concepts and functions) | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Excellent pace and great course material. I like having both the videos and slides to refer to, as it allows me to continue studying in environments where I can't play a video. The content turned out to be unexpectedly useful in my work, too. | I can't play a video. The | Content | turned out to be unexpectedly useful | Negative | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | still. easy assignment... gives five star because the instructor did a very clear explanation and course content is well organized | a very clear explanation and course | Content | is well organized | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Way too expensive for its contents | Way too expensive for its | Content | | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Excellent course - complicated enough content but not too much to scare away someone who takes classes in the evening after work. | Excellent course - complicated enough | Content | but not too much to scare | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The course was perfect for my current circumstances. I have been working for quite some time and wanted to freshen my skill set. These courses fit perfectly into the busy schedules of modern families. I strongly encourage other associates to consider taking the courses as well. They can easily fit into a Sunday afternoon or after work, if not exhausted. The content of the course improved upon the first course, and touched on subjects I was curious about but never completely understood. I plan to take more courses as it develops interests into skills without the HUGE expense and pressure of a degree type program which would not fit into my current life. | after work, if not exhausted. The | Content | of the course improved upon the | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I really like the course content and the instructor is nice | I really like the course | Content | and the instructor is nice | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Excellent content and teacher. | Excellent | Content | and teacher. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Thanks for your teaching!!! This content includes basic python concept, syntax and excises which are batter for beginner. | for your teaching! ! ! This | Content | includes basic python concept, syntax and | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The professor is particularly good at explaining. He builds from previous lessons and it's easy to get an understanding of the topic. The pace and content are just right. | of the topic. The pace and | Content | are just right. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Excellent lecturer! Excellent content! | Excellent lecturer! Excellent | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The pace of this course & the course content, along with the Creative Commons material is fabulous for anyone who has no prior experience in programming. Prof. Severance is great at what he does, and the assignments are also brilliant. I wished there were more peer review assignments or more assignments so that we could practice more. | of this course & the course | Content | along with the Creative Commons material | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Excellent content and well paced | Excellent | Content | and well paced | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | great content, but a little short... would love to meed Dr. Chuck in person ! =) | great | Content | but a little short. . . | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Phenomenal course! love the pace, the content, the structure and the delivery. Truly outstanding. | Phenomenal course! love the pace, the | Content | the structure and the delivery. Truly | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great course, step-by-step learning. Content is easy to understand and well explained. Videos provide further explanation, if required. If you want to learn Python by yourself, get enrolled now! | Great course, step-by-step learning. | Content | is easy to understand and well | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | fun content and easy to learn. The difficulty of the assignment is in the right ratio, I like it a lot. | fun | Content | and easy to learn. The difficulty | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good, well structured and explained. I loved the course and its content. I recommend it for who wants to learn Python. | I loved the course and its | Content | I recommend it for who wants | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good content with a nice bit of character and playfulness from the professor. Be prepared to find your own ways to practice and solidify the skill, though. | Good | Content | with a nice bit of character | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Awesome Professor and great content! | Awesome Professor and great | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Wonderful course. Interesting professor. Useful content. | Wonderful course. Interesting professor. Useful | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The contents are easy to understand and learn, many thanks! | The | Content | are easy to understand and learn, | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great course with well structured content and great delivery style | Great course with well structured | Content | and great delivery style | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | This is one of the best online course I ever had.The course content is top notch .The assignments are at very good standards.I strongly recommend | course I ever had. The course | Content | is top notch . The assignments | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great content for starters!! Slides are easy to follow. Lectures are never boring mainly due to the witty professor!! Love this course!! | Great | Content | for starters! ! Slides are easy | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | great content, thanks | great | Content | thanks | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The class was great! The professor is excellent. He does a great job of explaining the material, and he's fun to listen to. He also sprinkles the course with interesting related content. It was a great experience. | sprinkles the course with interesting related | Content | It was a great experience. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Dr. Chuck's Python sequence here on Coursera is a MUST TAKE for anyone interested in programming. In the second course, I found the content much more applicable to the kinds of data problem solving that I encounter in my work and understanding how to read files of data and turn those into usable data structures to manipulate the information found within is invaluable regardless of your profession. Keep up the great work and I am looking forward to taking more courses in this sequence! | the second course, I found the | Content | much more applicable to the kinds | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The faculty is really cool and has an excellent way of explaining concepts. Content is also practical and useful. I am enjoying the course very much. | an excellent way of explaining concepts. | Content | is also practical and useful. I | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Continuing with part 2 of the specialization, this course was as good and interesting as the first one. Dr. Chuck knows how to lay the fundamentals of progamming in an understandable and easy way to digest the content. The best part is that you get time to practice and resolve by yourself each problem finding your own strengths and weakness and work into improve your skills. | and easy way to digest the | Content | The best part is that you | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | This was my 2nd course of specialization in python. Content of the course is really helpful for the beginners like me. Instructor Mr. Charles Severance explained every concept in the simplest way. | 2nd course of specialization in python. | Content | of the course is really helpful | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Prof. Chuck - Shout from India, you are super awesome. Course content and your teaching style...... and like you say...yati yata | India, you are super awesome. Course | Content | and your teaching style. . . | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I think the lectures were excellent, containing plenty of content and a periodic sprinkling of humour. I have programmed in Python for a couple of years but this course taught me some neat techniques I hadn't previously encountered. I hope I can cope with the next part and am looking forward to the chapter on regular expressions. | lectures were excellent, containing plenty of | Content | and a periodic sprinkling of humour. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Awesome class, really enjoyed the content! | Awesome class, really enjoyed the | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great content and pacing, loves the P's and C's from the ceremony speech :) | Great | Content | and pacing, loves the P's and | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | More content can be put in. | More | Content | can be put in. | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| Pc2juyEIEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | I would expect less mistakes in english. It would make a better impression. The course content was well-thought and well-balanced, the professor had a great way of presenting the material, but the english language part needed some editing. | make a better impression. The course | Content | was well-thought and well-balanced, the professor | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| pD1uvzvKEeWjyxInT4zYJQ | Course content has been presented in an excellent manner. | Course | Content | has been presented in an excellent | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Decent course, except in the last week it felt a bit stitched together from parts of a previous course and a new one. The jump in flow seemed abrupt and the relevance of some of the contents (regarding Future's) was not clear. | the relevance of some of the | Content | (regarding Future's) was not clear. | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | I believe the quality of the course is above average. But I have to admit that it can hardly be called a great course, in that the content of the course seems to be loose, inconsistent and sorta unorganized. Martin is no wonder one of the greatest computer scientists in the world, but there is still a long way to go before his course can match his ability as computer scientist. Many thanks for Martin anyway for his great contribution to the world, hope your course will keep growing as Scala does! | a great course, in that the | Content | of the course seems to be | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | The content is interesting, however, Reactive looks not maintained in Scala anymore, ScalaCheck assignment looks to have nothing to do with the course content of the week, Future part took large amount of a week but no relevant assignment. Because the "Functional Programming Principles in Scala" was such a great and well organized course, it can bring disappointment, because the expectation was set so high by the "principle" one. | The | Content | is interesting, however, Reactive looks not | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | The content is interesting, however, Reactive looks not maintained in Scala anymore, ScalaCheck assignment looks to have nothing to do with the course content of the week, Future part took large amount of a week but no relevant assignment. Because the "Functional Programming Principles in Scala" was such a great and well organized course, it can bring disappointment, because the expectation was set so high by the "principle" one. | nothing to do with the course | Content | of the week, Future part took | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | The course was still useful and with new information but I really found it lacking cohesion with the overall specialization and with its own content. | overall specialization and with its own | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Several courses have been combined. Content is not updated. Now is 2016. | Several courses have been combined. | Content | is not updated. Now is 2016. | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Really enjoyed this course. Having had experience in functional reactive programming, the content wasn't overly in depth but it helped cement understanding of how functional patterns can be used in place of OO ones, as well as further the knowledge of Scala gained in the first course. The content on streams and futures was particularly helpful for me. | experience in functional reactive programming, the | Content | wasn't overly in depth but it | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Really enjoyed this course. Having had experience in functional reactive programming, the content wasn't overly in depth but it helped cement understanding of how functional patterns can be used in place of OO ones, as well as further the knowledge of Scala gained in the first course. The content on streams and futures was particularly helpful for me. | gained in the first course. The | Content | on streams and futures was particularly | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | The subject is really interesting, and some of the shown approaches really "close to the edge". However, there is too much "cut and paste" from other courses. this makes this one difficult to follow. It has lost "coherence". The cross-references don't make any sense, and the assignments fall too short with regard to the content. I think the remake from the original "Functional Programming ___ in Scala" + "Reactive Programming" has not been as successful as it should. This new format within Coursera (everything shorter, more expensive and with less people involved) is not as good as the original one. Maybe this is the only way they can make enough money to sustain the whole... but the "more idealistic" start was far more pleasant. | too short with regard to the | Content | I think the remake from the | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Mostly as good as the course "Functional Programming Principles in Scala" I took couple of years ago. However, some of the videos are clearly taken from another courses and referencing to content not in this course. Especially the final week's content is very confusing, topics changing constantly without clear context and presentation. (I actually purposedly skipped the last few videos, as they seemed completely off the track and it was very hard to get anything out of them.) The exercices were good, starting where the previous course ended, and most of the videos were clear and well done (basically the videos by Martin). | from another courses and referencing to | Content | not in this course. Especially the | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Mostly as good as the course "Functional Programming Principles in Scala" I took couple of years ago. However, some of the videos are clearly taken from another courses and referencing to content not in this course. Especially the final week's content is very confusing, topics changing constantly without clear context and presentation. (I actually purposedly skipped the last few videos, as they seemed completely off the track and it was very hard to get anything out of them.) The exercices were good, starting where the previous course ended, and most of the videos were clear and well done (basically the videos by Martin). | this course. Especially the final week's | Content | is very confusing, topics changing constantly | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | This course is a re-hash of both the excellent "Functional Programming Principles in Scala" and the mediocre "Principles of Reactive Programming in Scala". Unfortunately, in quality it's closer to the latter: mixed quality, lectures that seem unrelated to their corresponding assignments, many errors (both typos and, more seriously, examples that don't type-check!) and a general lack of an in-depth motivation for the principles. Staff participation in my run of the course (2016) was disappointingly low; in some cases there was no response at all to students pointing out glaring errors in the lectures. It's very noticeable that this course is a patchwork of previous courses. In same cases the video lectures even display the wrong title for the course, or mention lectures that no longer exist in this version of the course! The course has interesting parts (I was especially thrilled when I saw there were lectures about FRP), but its quality is way below "Functional Programming Principles in Scala". I'm disappointed. To make this review constructive, my recommendations: 1- Pay attention to quality. Make sure all examples compile and type-check. 2- Make sure you're not repeating content already in other courses, especially if they are part of the same specialization! 3- If you're going to re-use content from other contents, make sure it fits the current course. Do not mention lectures not in the course. | 2- Make sure you're not repeating | Content | already in other courses, especially if | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | This course is a re-hash of both the excellent "Functional Programming Principles in Scala" and the mediocre "Principles of Reactive Programming in Scala". Unfortunately, in quality it's closer to the latter: mixed quality, lectures that seem unrelated to their corresponding assignments, many errors (both typos and, more seriously, examples that don't type-check!) and a general lack of an in-depth motivation for the principles. Staff participation in my run of the course (2016) was disappointingly low; in some cases there was no response at all to students pointing out glaring errors in the lectures. It's very noticeable that this course is a patchwork of previous courses. In same cases the video lectures even display the wrong title for the course, or mention lectures that no longer exist in this version of the course! The course has interesting parts (I was especially thrilled when I saw there were lectures about FRP), but its quality is way below "Functional Programming Principles in Scala". I'm disappointed. To make this review constructive, my recommendations: 1- Pay attention to quality. Make sure all examples compile and type-check. 2- Make sure you're not repeating content already in other courses, especially if they are part of the same specialization! 3- If you're going to re-use content from other contents, make sure it fits the current course. Do not mention lectures not in the course. | 3- If you're going to re-use | Content | from other contents, make sure it | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | This course is a re-hash of both the excellent "Functional Programming Principles in Scala" and the mediocre "Principles of Reactive Programming in Scala". Unfortunately, in quality it's closer to the latter: mixed quality, lectures that seem unrelated to their corresponding assignments, many errors (both typos and, more seriously, examples that don't type-check!) and a general lack of an in-depth motivation for the principles. Staff participation in my run of the course (2016) was disappointingly low; in some cases there was no response at all to students pointing out glaring errors in the lectures. It's very noticeable that this course is a patchwork of previous courses. In same cases the video lectures even display the wrong title for the course, or mention lectures that no longer exist in this version of the course! The course has interesting parts (I was especially thrilled when I saw there were lectures about FRP), but its quality is way below "Functional Programming Principles in Scala". I'm disappointed. To make this review constructive, my recommendations: 1- Pay attention to quality. Make sure all examples compile and type-check. 2- Make sure you're not repeating content already in other courses, especially if they are part of the same specialization! 3- If you're going to re-use content from other contents, make sure it fits the current course. Do not mention lectures not in the course. | going to re-use content from other | Content | make sure it fits the current | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | The content is excellent (as always), however the form leaves a bit to be desired. The video quality kept reverting to "low", and even on "high", the resolution was nothing to be proud of in 2016 (or at any time during this century). Also, the instructors appeared to make references to lectures that are not a part of this edition of the course. But these are small issues – the course is definitely worth taking, small imperfections or not. | The | Content | is excellent (as always), however the | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | A bit lost sometimes. The course was remodeled after previous ones obviously and it seems a little chaotic sometimes. Not sure to get all the message that was intended to be passed. Sometimes the exercice are way simpler than the session contents. Still I've enjoyed (almost) every moment of the course and I am eager to go on! Thanks! | are way simpler than the session | Content | Still I've enjoyed (almost) every moment | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Maybe an unfair comparison but I am comparing this with the principles of reactive programming. That had much more contents such as actors, etc. Having said that this is a good course by itself. | reactive programming. That had much more | Content | such as actors, etc. Having said | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Most of the content was included in Functional Programming in Scala and Reactive Programming Principles in Scala. | Most of the | Content | was included in Functional Programming in | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| pFHWsjyCEeW7GArkqhNhJw | Great topic and content. But there are several things that make this course cumbersome. It would be better to have a few shorter videos than to have one file of 30 to 60 minutes. Also please do not use hardcoded subtitles in the video, because there already is a option to enable subtitles. The last recommendation is to not mix videos and resources. Use the videos to lecture material, to narrate a story or show clips, but put all the resources (mandatory or optional) on a separate HTML page (as other courses usually do). Thank you for making the history of spaceflight come to live for me! | Great topic and | Content | But there are several things that | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| PifzBSv3EeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | Great contents! It is very well developed by new additional resources and links comparing to last year. Thanks Coursera! | Great | Content | It is very well developed by | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| PifzBSv3EeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | Perfect content for understanding the topic. Clear and concise. | Perfect | Content | for understanding the topic. Clear and | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| PifzBSv3EeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | Hi Team, Course is good. Videos and contents need to be updated on regular basis, sometimes data discussed is bit outdated. | Team, Course is good. Videos and | Content | need to be updated on regular | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| PJg2NGKXEeWpHwqwM9Gg0w | Some of this content is glaringly wrong e.g that F Roosevelt's freedoms weren't seen by him as inalienable rights, that culture and education were attributes of Eleanor's approach to freedom that were distinctive from FDR. One can go on and on .... | Some of this | Content | is glaringly wrong e. g that | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| pkE92hJhEearKQowajWNkQ | This course is excellent for a beginner like me. I'm loving everything about it - the content, structure, not to mention the instructor's charismatic style. This is a much appreciated opportunity to learn and understand music theory from someone who has such obvious passion for music. | loving everything about it - the | Content | structure, not to mention the instructor's | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Great content | Great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | great course content | great course | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | I think should be more lessons with less time, like the first modules. But the content is great! | like the first modules. But the | Content | is great! | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | The content was well explained but a bit "light". | The | Content | was well explained but a bit | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Nice Instructor and course content... Loved doing this course. | Nice Instructor and course | Content | . . Loved doing this course. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | No enthusiasm to hold attention but good content | enthusiasm to hold attention but good | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Course with good content and overview of project management, albeit being a bit too simplistic. | Course with good | Content | and overview of project management, albeit | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | It`s great course , content many information and great Doctor | It`s great course , | Content | many information and great Doctor | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Great course. I would have distributed more consistently the content through the weeks, as week four had significantly more than the other three. | would have distributed more consistently the | Content | through the weeks, as week four | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | It has very good content, specially if you are looking for basic concepts, you can find those here, although it doesn't go deeply on them, gives you what you need to get started, it's a fast pace so you have to keep up, and use of side materials/web to complement the course. | It has very good | Content | specially if you are looking for | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good content | Good | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | I like the course content | I like the course | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Nice approach, needed more organized content! | Nice approach, needed more organized | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | This course seemed to me the most un-interesting course. The content though important was not taught in a way to engage the student. The professor basically read everything. I could have easily done with slides than a lecture. Hopefully, this course can be revised to make it more exciting, interesting and engaging. | me the most un-interesting course. The | Content | though important was not taught in | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Informative course, very well organized, and very useful tools & strategies presented in the course. The presentations are a bit deadpan, and the assignments aren't overly helpful (only quizzes), but the content is good. | overly helpful (only quizzes), but the | Content | is good. | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | This is a great introduction to Project Management, clear language and examples with PMI concepts and definitions. I would just improve the slides PDF files, there is no need to put one slide for each action, if there is a list, each element of the list generates a new slide. Anyway content is great. Thanks a lot! | list generates a new slide. Anyway | Content | is great. Thanks a lot! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | An amazing introductory course that clearly teaches you the project management principles. I came out feeling that it gave me great building blocks to put on practice at work straight away. On top of the contents, the concrete and amusing ways of the instructor make this course a must for anyone. | straight away. On top of the | Content | the concrete and amusing ways of | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good and very practical content ready to be applied. | Good and very practical | Content | ready to be applied. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Instructor seems uninterested or bored. Sometimes he only reads the slides without adding anything else to the content. Others, he goes quickly through a slide without any time to digest the information. Overall, intro level concepts are ok, but specifics about creation or handling of tools is left without deeper explanation | without adding anything else to the | Content | Others, he goes quickly through a | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Prof Rob Stone is a very good speaker and has made the videos very informative. The content is very small, which is good because it makes the course very lean, but bad because it merely scratches the surface of project management world. | made the videos very informative. The | Content | is very small, which is good | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| prHAajqwEeWXuQopUhAqaw | Thoroughly enjoyed this course and learned a lot! Wonderful tutors, clear and in-depth explanations and well-delivered lectures, very informative and engaging course content. Pleased to have chosen it as my first online learning course. Thank you. | lectures, very informative and engaging course | Content | Pleased to have chosen it as | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| prHAajqwEeWXuQopUhAqaw | Some good content. However, text has numerous spelling mistakes and there is no involvement by academic staff. Nor can one see one's answers to quizzes once done., nor standard answers provided. As with so many Coursera MOOC's, little involvement by fellow students in discussion fora. No certificate on completion, which is a pity because the cost of a purchased one is somewhat prohibitive for third world students with our exchange rates. | Some good | Content | However, text has numerous spelling mistakes | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| pSaP4p3ZEeW_wArffOXkOw | The content of this course is easy to understand. The approaches of effectively learning is very easy to learn and to practice! | The | Content | of this course is easy to | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| PwuYBQZREeW5gyIACwQVNg | This is an outstanding course; one of the gems of the Coursera platform. It is only the launching point for my study of and fascination with complex analysis. I'd say the course covers about three-fifths of the content for an engineering mathematics treatment of functions of complex variables. I'm a student of fluid mechanics and my ignorance of advanced concepts in complex analysis has kept me from mastering some of the advanced topics in FM. I'm well on my way to go beyond those barriers, now. | course covers about three-fifths of the | Content | for an engineering mathematics treatment of | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| PwuYBQZREeW5gyIACwQVNg | This course has been very exciting and powerfull. The lectures are very clear and the professor use many didactic tools for improving our learning. The content of this course is completed with some other advanced topics in mathematics (for example: topology), and the course is well enriched. I recommend this course for all learners who want to learn something of advanced mathematics. | tools for improving our learning. The | Content | of this course is completed with | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| PwuYBQZREeW5gyIACwQVNg | Excellent course with interesting content, great self explanatory notes and a nice teacher who explains it all meticulously! | Excellent course with interesting | Content | great self explanatory notes and a | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| PZNTj2DEEeWVEg5QpF1H_w | The information given is great so far. I would like to have some more questonnaire or summaries to further implement the learned content. Thank you for your services. | summaries to further implement the learned | Content | Thank you for your services. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| PZNTj2DEEeWVEg5QpF1H_w | amazing content ...awesome professor | amazing | Content | . . . awesome professor | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| q3r0bBbMEeafcQ6IJeJ6Vw | The material in this course is well presented, though scarce at times. However it has its share of problems : -little to no interaction from TA's or mentors in the forums -the quizzes are often out of sync with the lectures -the final exam has severe problems with questions (form not content). In more detail, on the final exam, some of the questions don't even contain all the content to answer them. They can request multiple answers but have single question boxes and/or the reverse. | severe problems with questions (form not | Content | In more detail, on the final | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| q3r0bBbMEeafcQ6IJeJ6Vw | The material in this course is well presented, though scarce at times. However it has its share of problems : -little to no interaction from TA's or mentors in the forums -the quizzes are often out of sync with the lectures -the final exam has severe problems with questions (form not content). In more detail, on the final exam, some of the questions don't even contain all the content to answer them. They can request multiple answers but have single question boxes and/or the reverse. | questions don't even contain all the | Content | to answer them. They can request | Negative | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| q6hZQfQtEeS_qSIACxODig | The topics are of interest however the course content could be presented better. In most instances it is hard to predict where the instructor is writing and is hard to read. Also writes over the slide material. | are of interest however the course | Content | could be presented better. In most | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | Excellent course! Dr. Shelton is an excellent instructor and the content is very insightful. | is an excellent instructor and the | Content | is very insightful. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | Good if you want to fall asleep. The content is probably interesting, but they would have some use of advice from the entertaining industry. | you want to fall asleep. The | Content | is probably interesting, but they would | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | The course content is very well organized. Every aspect of the topic has been covered with emphasis on the important factors. | The course | Content | is very well organized. Every aspect | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | Got good understanding about energy demand, supply and its independence. Good content and lecture. | demand, supply and its independence. Good | Content | and lecture. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| q78Cq1x8EeW9BBKT5ztNhQ | I thoroughly enjoyed the content and pace of this course. | I thoroughly enjoyed the | Content | and pace of this course. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | I absolutely loved the course and the content! | absolutely loved the course and the | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | I'm absolutely loving this course! Prof Raj's presence just cheers me up..he's so bubbly and positive! The content is really excellent. Great to have all of this information in one place. I'm really enjoying the exercises too, thank you so much! | he's so bubbly and positive! The | Content | is really excellent. Great to have | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | I have enjoyed this class so much - it has given me skills to be a happier person! can a person ask for anything more than that? the professor and course content was awesome! well done! | than that? the professor and course | Content | was awesome! well done! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | 5 star for effort. 4 star for content - some of the findings are open to debate but are seemingly portrayed as "truths" 0 star for trying to obtaining personal information (name, email) under the pretext of assignment when such information are not required for completing the assignment. | star for effort. 4 star for | Content | - some of the findings are | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Rich, great and intense course. Be aware of the implication of the students before enrolling in order to be stressed about the exercice that need you to work / think of it every week. Thank you for the content which is really rich. | every week. Thank you for the | Content | which is really rich. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Good contents. Interactive. Useful for life. | Good | Content | Interactive. Useful for life. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Thank you so much for offering this class on Coursera. I like the professor's teaching style and the class content very much. | professor's teaching style and the class | Content | very much. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Great course, really tied in nicely with all the stuff I have been learning about mindfulness. Loved the presentation style and content. | mindfulness. Loved the presentation style and | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Excellent course content, a little longwinded on the videos, and therefore more diffuse than it needs to be, however a hugely important topic, and presented multidimensionally in a way that draws in the latest research as well as ancient wisdom . The happiness framework gives a clearcut way of action-ing Happiness hacks into ones life. Even the apparently simple task of Defining Happiness makes it clear how we are unclear & confused about happiness, to the extent that we keep measuring the wrong metrics. Ones that could never result in happiness! | Excellent course | Content | a little longwinded on the videos, | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | This is a wonderful course that teaches us much needed strategies to mitigate our problems(or view of) and learn tactics and habits that will help us lead a happier life. Some of the content feels like its basic, but its a much needed reminder. I appreciated the expertise interviews that are incorporated into this course. There is important science behind the concept of being happy and you learn it here. Professor Raj has an optimistic style of teaching and it brightens the course work and mood within the course. I would take it again. | a happier life. Some of the | Content | feels like its basic, but its | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | The content of the course was actually very helpful, but the way the assignments are made took all my motivation away. They use an external tool where one has to enter the information for the assigments, at the end you get a PDF and then you have to copy paste that again into Coursera. The emails are often confusing and some assignements require you to do something each day for seven days in a row, but don't really warn you about that anywhere. So when you think that you have 3 days left to meet the deadline ... wrong, you should've started 4 days ago. This in combination with the ridiculously detailed instruction videos, which consist to 95% of a tutor reading aloud what is written on the assignment webpage. Chances are you get bored quickly and miss the one information that was NOT given on the assignment webpage. In total, it is very sad that this course started so great, but the technical and organizational problems reduced the motivation so much. | The | Content | of the course was actually very | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | The content it has been very exciting, dynamic and enjoyable. I like how the information is structured and all the sources from professionals are gathering together. Great class for everybody! definitely much more than a Happy Life course. The only thing I don't love about it is the music introduction in every session, which for me is a little too cheese. | The | Content | it has been very exciting, dynamic | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | In addition of the very relevant content, all the materials and videos are of very high quality. Além do tema ser muito relevante, todo o material e os vídeos são de alta qualidade. | In addition of the very relevant | Content | all the materials and videos are | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Thank you! I enjoyed the content and learning more about happiness. I found the music a wee bit corny, though. | Thank you! I enjoyed the | Content | and learning more about happiness. I | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | A must! I'm sure EVERYBODY can benefit inmensly from taking this course! Excellent content, excellent quality, excellent proffesor! | inmensly from taking this course! Excellent | Content | excellent quality, excellent proffesor! | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Prof Raj is a charismatic and engaging professor. Although at first glance, the content may seem theoretically heavy and dull, he teaches in an entertaining way without jargon, and with lots of anecdotes and metaphors, making it easy to follow, and most of all, fun to learn. I would definitely recommend this course for you! OVERVIEW Each module and the entirety of the course is structured very comprehensively. The lectures incorporate various professors who are experts in their field via video conference, telephone, and quotes. Lecture videos (though sometimes long) have lots of embedded quizzes and relevant external videos. Just like taking a course at university, supplemental (yet an optional) reading list is provided for those who wish to explore further. LECTURE VIDEOS Prof Raj definitely knows what he is talking about and the videos are easy to follow. There are only a few videos where the audio isn't the best, but transcripts can be downloaded on Coursera, and a clean-format of the transcription can be found on the Facebook page. The animations, lighting, audio, in general are all great. THE COMMUNITY The discussion forum is very active. With at least three mentors active during the duration of the course, and at least one responding to a post within a business day, you won't feel like you're taking the course alone. CAUTION ! Although it states that time commitment is 2-3 hours a week, it will most likely take more than that. The total number of minutes spent on watching all lecture videos (for that week) averages to a little over 2 hours. If you're like me and want to take notes or take a break while studying or re-watch a lecture, you'll need more time. Plus on top of that, there are quizzes and assignments. (You can save time by not submitting assignments via the ISB website.) I would allocate minimum 3 hours a week for this course and maximum 5. Bare this in mind for those who are working or studying full-time or are taking other MOOC courses. - Enjoy the course! | professor. Although at first glance, the | Content | may seem theoretically heavy and dull, | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | What a wonderful experience taking this class has been...I have really enjoyed Prof. Raj's videos and learning about human nature in regards to our happiness levels...I believe this to be a beneficial class for anyone and everyone to take and have expressed my excitement for it on many occasions with those I come in contact with...THANK YOU for the amazing work on putting this beneficiary course together...I hope to have the opportunity to continually review the content and continue to learn and grow in a positive way... | the opportunity to continually review the | Content | and continue to learn and grow | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Fantastic approach to the topic. Excellent content and delivery. | Fantastic approach to the topic. Excellent | Content | and delivery. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | The Course seems to be a great one and the way it has been delivered is fantastic... Although, I know there is a lot of content to be covered to make it really impactful but I felt the duration is just a bit longer than expected. | know there is a lot of | Content | to be covered to make it | Negative | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Great content and delivered well. Kudos Prof Raj and team | Great | Content | and delivered well. Kudos Prof Raj | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | the contents of the course were very good. It is essential material that everyone should learn about as early as possible in their life. It should be essential learning in each school. All the material is based on scientific facts. there are, however, reasons why I did not rate this course with 5 points. The amount of material takes a lifetime to digest and adopt. To cram this into a few weeks was not the appropriate way to teach it. there were way too many videos one was supposed to watch within a single week. Sometimes even the summary videos for a single week took 20 minutes. That is just not right. I was so busy memorizing the material that I did not find the time to adopt it in my daily life. what a pity. it will take me many months to really digest the material | the | Content | of the course were very good. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | I've taken about 70 MOOCs across multiple platforms. Of those 70, I've completed about 12. Of those 12, about 4 were good. This is one of those four. Sometimes the videos were a little long, but the work was inspired and the science behind the content was great. I did every assignment (rare for a MOOCer, as you probably know). This was totally worth my time. I hope you find it to be worth yours. Enjoy! | inspired and the science behind the | Content | was great. I did every assignment | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Thank you so much! It's a great and fantastic course, extremely well organized and presented. The professors could not be better, the materials as well, and well.. the contents... perfect. Thank you so much to all the team! | as well, and well. . the | Content | . . perfect. Thank you so | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | excellent course with great content | excellent course with great | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | This course has been really eye opener. The research on happiness done by Prof. Mr Raj is amazing. The way the course is designed is very nice. There are systematic contents in every week. I must the exercises also are very good and I did not feel that I am doing this course on virtual platform. Kudos to all the team who have really put an effort to make this course available on Coursera! I would highly recommend this course to all my friends, colleagues and relatives. Cheers and Thank you. | is very nice. There are systematic | Content | in every week. I must the | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Very good content, oo long, too many words to get to the point, and too many instructions on assignments. | Very good | Content | oo long, too many words to | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Exceptionally well taught and amazing content! I can only recommend everyone takes this course :-) | Exceptionally well taught and amazing | Content | I can only recommend everyone takes | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Excellent course. Engaging, fun, thought-provoking, meaningful, blended learning experience the content of which is life changing. Highly recommend this course to all that will listen! Bravo Dr. Happy Smart & Indian School of Business! Bravo! | thought-provoking, meaningful, blended learning experience the | Content | of which is life changing. Highly | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | I love this course. Very interesting, full of practical and useful content. 5* | interesting, full of practical and useful | Content | 5* | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | super course - both the content and organizational aspect of it thank you that I could participate! best | super course - both the | Content | and organizational aspect of it thank | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | The most happy class ever. Great teachers, great content! | happy class ever. Great teachers, great | Content | | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | This course is one of the best offerings I've taken from Coursera. Due to Raj, Catherine and the team, the content, research, production with graphics, and readings ----- the weeks' lessons far exceeded my expectations. The trick with learning is applying what I have learned, so that is my intent. Hats off to enhancing sometimes hard-to-grasp concepts through video, interviews and quizzes. The online format and technical process worked 100% fine for me without any problems or glitches. I have been happy with everything! Thank you! Learner ID | Raj, Catherine and the team, the | Content | research, production with graphics, and readings | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | wonderful course one of its kind, very beautiful and effective presentation, smooth flow , life changing content | presentation, smooth flow , life changing | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Title is a bit sappy, but content is excellent with a very engaging instructor. Would highly recommend to anyone in management or professional field, as this course will not only offer introspection into your own psyche, but offer insight into how and why others think the way they do. | Title is a bit sappy, but | Content | is excellent with a very engaging | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| QgmoVdT2EeSlhSIACx2EBw | Great course, contents are very accurate and comprehensive, explained in a simple manner. | Great course, | Content | are very accurate and comprehensive, explained | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| QgmoVdT2EeSlhSIACx2EBw | Pros: Content Professor Depth of material Cons: Exams are shit, full of mistakes, stuid questions asking 2 values but you have one field to fill in the data. Totally unacceptable quality issues with exams. READ THE FORUM!!!! | Pros: | Content | Professor Depth of material Cons: Exams | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| QgmoVdT2EeSlhSIACx2EBw | Great Content! Very recommendable. | Great | Content | Very recommendable. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| QKGzLQoYEeWKzSIAC7Uk8A | I didn't learn a whole lot -perhaps it is because I'm not coming into a professional setting as a newbie anymore? I found a lot of the examples juvenile - 'wearing a robe to the office' or 'stealing things'. I was looking for more substantial examples of idealogical conflict I guess -stuff that is harder to resolve than being a person of integrity and making good decisions. I know this is just module 1, but the content didn't feel valuable for the most part. The assignments were alright. | is just module 1, but the | Content | didn't feel valuable for the most | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| QKGzLQoYEeWKzSIAC7Uk8A | Great course and content | Great course and | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| QKGzLQoYEeWKzSIAC7Uk8A | Excellent course content. | Excellent course | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Great content, horrible technical support from Coursera and the team that runs this program (since it is clearly obvious that Michael Mannino just recorded the videos and is not part of the class anymore). | Great | Content | horrible technical support from Coursera and | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | The content was very well structured, the practices were very appropiate to the concepts that the course is teaching. And the professor is very clear explaining each of the modules, one of the best courses I that have participated . Thanks ! | The | Content | was very well structured, the practices | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | very informative and rich content | very informative and rich | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Pros: The course content covers a lot of relevant topics on Database Management. Things like Basic SQL queries, Database Normalization, Conceptual and Logical databases, and making ER diagrams are covered in the course. Cons: Prof Mannino is a bit robotic in his reading out of long sentences and the constant pace of talking. There is tons of repetition of sentences and words mere seconds after they were just spoken. The lectures seem to be a collection of bullet points. The assignments and the peer review structure is really a low point. There's no specific grading rubric - so points allocation is random and based on your peer's assessment. I had many instances where my right answers were marked as wrong. There is nothing you can do to correct it. Moreover, the questions are iterative and thus the same apparent error carries on and you get multiple wrong scores. Assignments need to be submitted in documents. Separate documents for each question !! At times, even a one-line answer needs to be in a separate document. Pictures of database diagrams need to be pasted in said documents. It was a bit frustrating to take screenshots all the time. Especially when you make a small correction, and have to take screenshots AGAIN, then paste it AGAIN, and upload AGAIN !! Summary: Take the course for it's content, and use the assignments as good practice. Don't take the grading seriously. Also, focus on the content rather than the delivery by the professor, and you will still be able to get some value out of the course (and the specialization by extension) | Pros: The course | Content | covers a lot of relevant topics | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Pros: The course content covers a lot of relevant topics on Database Management. Things like Basic SQL queries, Database Normalization, Conceptual and Logical databases, and making ER diagrams are covered in the course. Cons: Prof Mannino is a bit robotic in his reading out of long sentences and the constant pace of talking. There is tons of repetition of sentences and words mere seconds after they were just spoken. The lectures seem to be a collection of bullet points. The assignments and the peer review structure is really a low point. There's no specific grading rubric - so points allocation is random and based on your peer's assessment. I had many instances where my right answers were marked as wrong. There is nothing you can do to correct it. Moreover, the questions are iterative and thus the same apparent error carries on and you get multiple wrong scores. Assignments need to be submitted in documents. Separate documents for each question !! At times, even a one-line answer needs to be in a separate document. Pictures of database diagrams need to be pasted in said documents. It was a bit frustrating to take screenshots all the time. Especially when you make a small correction, and have to take screenshots AGAIN, then paste it AGAIN, and upload AGAIN !! Summary: Take the course for it's content, and use the assignments as good practice. Don't take the grading seriously. Also, focus on the content rather than the delivery by the professor, and you will still be able to get some value out of the course (and the specialization by extension) | Summary: Take the course for it's | Content | and use the assignments as good | Positive | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Pros: The course content covers a lot of relevant topics on Database Management. Things like Basic SQL queries, Database Normalization, Conceptual and Logical databases, and making ER diagrams are covered in the course. Cons: Prof Mannino is a bit robotic in his reading out of long sentences and the constant pace of talking. There is tons of repetition of sentences and words mere seconds after they were just spoken. The lectures seem to be a collection of bullet points. The assignments and the peer review structure is really a low point. There's no specific grading rubric - so points allocation is random and based on your peer's assessment. I had many instances where my right answers were marked as wrong. There is nothing you can do to correct it. Moreover, the questions are iterative and thus the same apparent error carries on and you get multiple wrong scores. Assignments need to be submitted in documents. Separate documents for each question !! At times, even a one-line answer needs to be in a separate document. Pictures of database diagrams need to be pasted in said documents. It was a bit frustrating to take screenshots all the time. Especially when you make a small correction, and have to take screenshots AGAIN, then paste it AGAIN, and upload AGAIN !! Summary: Take the course for it's content, and use the assignments as good practice. Don't take the grading seriously. Also, focus on the content rather than the delivery by the professor, and you will still be able to get some value out of the course (and the specialization by extension) | grading seriously. Also, focus on the | Content | rather than the delivery by the | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Great Course. Awesome Content. The sessions can be a little more interactive. | Great Course. Awesome | Content | The sessions can be a little | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | I found the content was great but the style of lectures were a bit too robotic and not conversational. This didn't help the learning process. Also, the course admin might consider explaining 'On' 'And' 'Where' 'TIMESTAMP', 'DateDiff' more than what was provided. | I found the | Content | was great but the style of | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Awesome course content and teaching techniques used by Michael Mannino.Kudos! | Awesome course | Content | and teaching techniques used by Michael | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Fair enough. Good material and content for someone new or that needs to remember basic concepts about databases. Not needed if the main focus is DWH and experience with DB exists | Fair enough. Good material and | Content | for someone new or that needs | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Great teacher and awesome content!!! | Great teacher and awesome | Content | ! ! | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Although not have any business intelligence content, I recommend it to people who need to strengthen their knowledge in databases. On the other hand, it should be an optional course for those who were interested in obtaining certification. | Although not have any business intelligence | Content | I recommend it to people who | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | very good teacher and very helpful and learning style and really appropriate course content. thumbs up | learning style and really appropriate course | Content | thumbs up | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| qO2z-Zz8EeWJORITtzkPnQ | The content covers very good the most important theories and concepts in macro economy and explains in detail the relationship between them. I wish the course would take more advantage of interactive multimedia tools in order to support the spoken word with visual means. | The | Content | covers very good the most important | Positive | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| qogqSFgBEeWBNwpVGuknww | He terribly prepared us for quizes and gave about 4 examples in the entire course. I filled a notebook with about 40 pages of notes, about 3 of which were useful for the quizes. Though content was good, but i found myself looking things up because of his somewhat neive explanations of difficult concept. | were useful for the quizes. Though | Content | was good, but i found myself | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very comprehensive and clear content delivery. Usable and helpful learning tools | Very comprehensive and clear | Content | delivery. Usable and helpful learning tools | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Thanks very much for great content and especially, Ms. Jana Schaich Borg for brilliant presentation skills, lovely voice and good looking as well. Please participate. This is highly recommend course. | Thanks very much for great | Content | and especially, Ms. Jana Schaich Borg | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very helpful content with easy-to-understand explanations that I can follow along. Jana is also engaging instructor. Tableau Desktop key provided is huge help as well. | Very helpful | Content | with easy-to-understand explanations that I can | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | One of the best courses on Coursera: the content covers not just the usage of Tableau but also the objectives heading into using Tableau as well as the presentation of the results one gets from Tableau. Most of all, it is evident that the trainers know their stuff and had a lot of fun putting this together! | the best courses on Coursera: the | Content | covers not just the usage of | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Its a good course, but I feel too much details in week 3 course content. | much details in week 3 course | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Excellent course. Love the content and the delivery. Also, the project is super cute! | Excellent course. Love the | Content | and the delivery. Also, the project | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The material is very interesting with well-made videos. Great course to get an introduction to Tableau. The downside for me was that some videos were rushed with as they had too much content, and quizzes could be much better, I found the questions not really up-to-par with the course content. | with as they had too much | Content | and quizzes could be much better, | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The material is very interesting with well-made videos. Great course to get an introduction to Tableau. The downside for me was that some videos were rushed with as they had too much content, and quizzes could be much better, I found the questions not really up-to-par with the course content. | not really up-to-par with the course | Content | | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The course content is itself interesting but the lack of active mentors to provide guidance makes the course really difficult to learn. So many unanswered questions on the discussion board and many confused students. I am so glad I am not paying for this course. | The course | Content | is itself interesting but the lack | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Incredibly content packed course. The best one of this series. | Incredibly | Content | packed course. The best one of | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good content! Thoughtful insight on approaching problem solving in data analysis world. | Good | Content | Thoughtful insight on approaching problem solving | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | wonderful design of content, good business examples. | wonderful design of | Content | good business examples. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| QPsZPf2gEeSvCSIAC12B5Q | Lots of content and interesting interviews though there may have been a superfluity of them. Oftentimes I found myself not paying attention because I was waiting for important information to be delivered. | Lots of | Content | and interesting interviews though there may | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| QPsZPf2gEeSvCSIAC12B5Q | I loved every unit. The lecturers were amazingly clear and I understood the content. Great work. | amazingly clear and I understood the | Content | Great work. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| QPsZPf2gEeSvCSIAC12B5Q | Excellent content from experts in the subject | Excellent | Content | from experts in the subject | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Qqmr3fBKEeWLaBLI8fdMlw | The lectures from week 1 to week 3 are nice and useful to me, but I think there should be more details about the content in week 4. For example, I think the lecture about the Jeffreys prior skipped many things and I did not understand this concept very well. | should be more details about the | Content | in week 4. For example, I | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| Qqmr3fBKEeWLaBLI8fdMlw | The course content is concise and straightforward. For novices it is very helpful | The course | Content | is concise and straightforward. For novices | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Qqmr3fBKEeWLaBLI8fdMlw | Excellent lectures by Herbert Lee. Great intuitive content for learners. | lectures by Herbert Lee. Great intuitive | Content | for learners. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| qqP6hnElEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Awesome course. Comprehensive content. Great lecturer. Proper labs. I like how this course does not just let you wade through learning GIS, because the technical level is high. You'll be a pro after going through all these courses | Awesome course. Comprehensive | Content | Great lecturer. Proper labs. I like | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| qqP6hnElEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Great class for expanding your GIS foundation skills. Learn to create and edit features; determine slope, elevation, and distance; upload your content to ArcGIS web maps. | slope, elevation, and distance; upload your | Content | to ArcGIS web maps. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| qqRBbiEREeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Some content is good and informative but there's a big problem with the teacher accent (adding a "ch" at the end of half the words) and his diction (hesitating on the other half the words). Also it seems that the course was created in a rush and lacks a lot of polishing(*). Sometimes the course assumes a good level in computer science and then 2 minutes later it explains how to do a decimal to binary conversion! This makes many videos boring but the slides are not provided so you really have to view the videos entirely. I've followed much harder courses with pleasure but here it was torture to finish it. Also most of the course is just definitions of some specific terms and not practical explanations. I agree that defining a few words is important but here it's just too much. *: Some videos are in reverse order, some are stopped in the middle of a sentence, some quizzes are bugged and don't give credit properly and there's nobody to help students... | Some | Content | is good and informative but there's | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| qqRBbiEREeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | The content is rich but the way of teaching is dull. | The | Content | is rich but the way of | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| QRDjcWLVEeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | I enjoyed this course immensely! I was a bit hesitant due to its length, however, the content was usually manageable and mostly interesting. A couple of the weeks, the lectures are quite lengthy and dense while others were a bit dry. Also, I think the week about bacteria could use a little more explanation. I feel as though I didn't really understand those concepts until watching that week's as well as the next week's lectures. Finally, the quiz questions for the third to last week were a bit confusing and didn't match well to what the instructors actually said. | due to its length, however, the | Content | was usually manageable and mostly interesting. | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| QRDjcWLVEeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | Thank you so much for this course, I really enjoyed it! I only gave 4 stars because sometimes it is really hard to understand, especially key words (I am not talking about the accent but the group and family latin names, etc); I constantly had to check the subtitles for these. To be honest I wasn't expecting this content after reading the course title, but it was nice to see evolution from this point of view, great job! | be honest I wasn't expecting this | Content | after reading the course title, but | Negative | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| QRDjcWLVEeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | This was an interesting and enjoyable course. The content was wide and varied. On the whole the lectures were well supported by videos and associated charts and tables.. However, I found that one or two of the lecturers', though they tried gamely, were a little unfamiliar with English. I fully understand that almost all of these people do not have English as a first (or second) language and admire their competence. If the transcripts had been corrected so that they more accurately reflected what the speaker was trying to say rather than what was actually said, I feel that would be a help. In spite of this, I would recommend this course to my friends and family. | an interesting and enjoyable course. The | Content | was wide and varied. On the | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| QRDjcWLVEeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | The course content is very very good and not superficial as some courses we see around here. I liked very much how the order of subjects where build. However, if you allow me to give a *constructive* criticism, please let me say that the strategy chosen to ask lectures to read from previous written scripts, instead of letting them present more naturally, was a bad one. I understand that in order to make the legends/captions available, the lecturers kinda read from scripts their talks and this was very bad. It would be much better next time if you allow each speaker give the talk naturally as they want, with no reading, and then latter produce the subtitles. The lecturers are reseachers and not ACTORS so the final result of reading word by word what they were saying compromised a lot the final quality of their talks. Please don't get me wrong, I just trying to be constructive giving back somehow the time and effort spent by you guys to prepare such nice course. | The course | Content | is very very good and not | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| QuMnnbfJEeSsbCIAC0gVBg | Exceptional course that explores the remediation of books, narrative, and other artwort like paintings into MMOs. The discussed example is Tolkien's "Lord of the Rings" and the games "Lord of the Rings Online". The support is outstanding on Coursera as well as in the game. Several servers are home to course accompanying groups who offer support and guidance with course related in-game assignments and the game itself. Great fun, great people, great content. | itself. Great fun, great people, great | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| qVetW596EeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | Really interesting course. I actually thought it was at least as good as the first and followed up on that material nicely. Overall, the content is extremely practical and gives you everything you need to plan and run a design | on that material nicely. Overall, the | Content | is extremely practical and gives you | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| qVetW596EeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | The course demonstrated a very thorough and practical way to implement the content learned in Course One. I especially liked that the course walked through an example from start to finish so you could explore each step of the sprint with a familiar problem scenario. | and practical way to implement the | Content | learned in Course One. I especially | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| qVetW596EeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | I only did week one of the course and quit for the following reasons: Presentation of the content is too fast and provides little information among lots of noise. Most of what's said is generic keywords assembled in sentences that don't make much sense, or implies "common sense" evidences barely illustrated with vague figures and no sources to support them. It makes everything hard to follow for beginners and unconvincing for more advanced students. On top of that, I feel offended by the mysogynist examples and the underlying contradictory assumptions that designers outside of agile are basically incompetent while saying at the same time that they will just use methods they already know anyway. | the following reasons: Presentation of the | Content | is too fast and provides little | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| Qx-vkAocEeWAYyIACmGIdw | There is lack of understanding how you actually build shown systems and software was presented in lectures if we deal with actual code.. but I gave 5 stars for creative and useful content provide the direction to go father in computer graphics field. I strongly recommend this course to students who starts developing digital content or/and programmers who want inspiration for their own projects. If there is a specialization on the topic, but with deep view on actual code samples, I would have bought one. | 5 stars for creative and useful | Content | provide the direction to go father | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Qx-vkAocEeWAYyIACmGIdw | There is lack of understanding how you actually build shown systems and software was presented in lectures if we deal with actual code.. but I gave 5 stars for creative and useful content provide the direction to go father in computer graphics field. I strongly recommend this course to students who starts developing digital content or/and programmers who want inspiration for their own projects. If there is a specialization on the topic, but with deep view on actual code samples, I would have bought one. | to students who starts developing digital | Content | or/and programmers who want inspiration for | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Qx-vkAocEeWAYyIACmGIdw | The algorithms presented in this course are interesting. However, the quizzes contain some questions that have no apparent relation to the content of the lectures, and some questions about details of the presented algorithms which are explained in neither the lectures, nor in the papers from which the lectures are derived. Also, most of the sample implementations will not run on a modern computer. They only work on Windows with Java 6 installed. | have no apparent relation to the | Content | of the lectures, and some questions | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| qXxuFBUnEeWhTg59fTWfpQ | Exceptionally good course in content, topic, applicability, interest and quality. Highly recommended to new leaders or anyone wanting to improve their ability to relate with, evaluate and motivate their coworkers and subordinates. | Exceptionally good course in | Content | topic, applicability, interest and quality. Highly | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Qzq_RhPlEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | The content is good but should be more organized. More instructions and explanation should be provided for exercises. Particularly, the auto grading system should be improved. Besides a simple term like "compile error", more explanation should be provided to help students debugging. | The | Content | is good but should be more | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| r0e9gyUAEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | The speaking style and body language of the instructor was quite monotonous when teaching the content. For the most part of the course, it felt like the instructor was just "reading" the teleprompter without blinking for several seconds! He did not attempt to teach the students in these videos. It could have been MUCH better if he had used better presentation tools and shorter sentences. | was quite monotonous when teaching the | Content | For the most part of the | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| r0e9gyUAEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | The course content itself was good, however the final assignment was vague and confusing. I think my coursemates had the same problem; all of the submissions I reviewed failed to discuss in any way at least one of the learning objectives. | The course | Content | itself was good, however the final | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| r0e9gyUAEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | I'm blown away by the content of this course and what I've learned. I took a strategy class before but the content in this one is so clear and well explained. | I'm blown away by the | Content | of this course and what I've | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| r0e9gyUAEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | I'm blown away by the content of this course and what I've learned. I took a strategy class before but the content in this one is so clear and well explained. | a strategy class before but the | Content | in this one is so clear | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| r0e9gyUAEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | I really liked the style of learning as well as the course content which gives me a broad overview of formulation of strategies. | learning as well as the course | Content | which gives me a broad overview | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| r0e9gyUAEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Nice form, shallow content. Simply too simple. Beware: upgrade / fee required for last two exams. | Nice form, shallow | Content | Simply too simple. Beware: upgrade / | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| R1xPlXlzEeW3pg6oA-kqJQ | Very informative and useful content just like the other courses in this series. | Very informative and useful | Content | just like the other courses in | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| R1xPlXlzEeW3pg6oA-kqJQ | The course contents and assignments are clear and well-structured. Compared to the algorithms & data structures courses, this one was a lot easier (for me anyway). I would have liked additional content on, for instance, (Markovian) grids/fields, but perhaps this will be covered in the 'advanced algorithms' course. | The course | Content | and assignments are clear and well-structured. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| R1xPlXlzEeW3pg6oA-kqJQ | The course contents and assignments are clear and well-structured. Compared to the algorithms & data structures courses, this one was a lot easier (for me anyway). I would have liked additional content on, for instance, (Markovian) grids/fields, but perhaps this will be covered in the 'advanced algorithms' course. | anyway). I would have liked additional | Content | on, for instance, (Markovian) grids/fields, but | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| R1xPlXlzEeW3pg6oA-kqJQ | Really Good Course , Problems are of good quality , the content is time saving and easy to understand. | are of good quality , the | Content | is time saving and easy to | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | Not much content covered in course, especially compared to Aerial Robotics. No real great sense of achievement on completion. | Not much | Content | covered in course, especially compared to | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | The contents and quality of the video lectures are great. The quality of the supplementary materials (like the quizzes and the Matlab code) provided by TAs for the assignments are very poor. The assignment guides are written with very poor grammar. The Matlab code is written using the worst coding and documenting practices. The automatic evaluation system (the system for grade the submissions), doest't provide useful feedback. As people can read in the course discussion forums, students have been asking for months for improvements to the grading systems. | The | Content | and quality of the video lectures | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | Great course! but there was too little content!!!! Double it !! Or double the coursework! make us do more work! Also, tell people to use 'parfor' to speed up the computations. Otherwise, great course! | course! but there was too little | Content | ! ! ! Double it ! | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | It is only introductory course. not a lot of content. | introductory course. not a lot of | Content | | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | I think there is need to provide clearer instructions on how to get the programming assignments done. The course content is good, but doing the programming assignments needs to be more clarified. | the programming assignments done. The course | Content | is good, but doing the programming | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | The Assignments are more of Trial and Error and not very helpful. The Course Material and Content is good. Teaching Staff is nowhere to be found. | very helpful. The Course Material and | Content | is good. Teaching Staff is nowhere | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | The course is so weak. No enough illustration for the content of the course. It's too short and not prepared very well. | weak. No enough illustration for the | Content | of the course. It's too short | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | The assignments were hard, not because of the contents of the courser, but for understanding the context of the method being implemented (what each variable meant and how it was expressed). Also, there should be a range of submissions that could be right but having higher or lower scores depending of how long it took to find the path, or how long the path was to reach the goal. | were hard, not because of the | Content | of the courser, but for understanding | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | I think that the theory was very poor in sense of the videos were very short and with little content. The topics that we've seen were difficult to learn by itself, and a better explanation could be very useful in practice. | were very short and with little | Content | The topics that we've seen were | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | Feedback is useless, but content is fine. | Feedback is useless, but | Content | is fine. | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | This is part 2 in the robotics specialization. The course content is way too short and basic for the price. There are about 77 minutes of lecture in total, i.e. less than 20 minutes per week. The first week covers BFS, Dijkstra, and A*, something part of most undergrad programs. The rest of the material is ok but very basic. The programming assignments are "implement Dijkstra" in week 1, "implement Dijkstra on a Torus" (and "do triangles intersect?") in week 2, a very simple for loop in week 3, and "implement gradient descent" in week 4. I could complete the course by looking at it on-and-off over one weekend. The material that is presented is presented well, but there's not enough of it. For reference, part 1 of the robotics specialization had over twice as much lecture content (by time) and then lots of supplementary material in addition to that, quizzes that required some thinking, and more relevant and at least slightly harder programming assignments. | in the robotics specialization. The course | Content | is way too short and basic | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | This is part 2 in the robotics specialization. The course content is way too short and basic for the price. There are about 77 minutes of lecture in total, i.e. less than 20 minutes per week. The first week covers BFS, Dijkstra, and A*, something part of most undergrad programs. The rest of the material is ok but very basic. The programming assignments are "implement Dijkstra" in week 1, "implement Dijkstra on a Torus" (and "do triangles intersect?") in week 2, a very simple for loop in week 3, and "implement gradient descent" in week 4. I could complete the course by looking at it on-and-off over one weekend. The material that is presented is presented well, but there's not enough of it. For reference, part 1 of the robotics specialization had over twice as much lecture content (by time) and then lots of supplementary material in addition to that, quizzes that required some thinking, and more relevant and at least slightly harder programming assignments. | had over twice as much lecture | Content | (by time) and then lots of | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| RAG6DaAREeWXWRL5-1Jq3w | Great course with an amazing content! | Great course with an amazing | Content | | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| raZNrgNGEeaJMgqy4cb6jQ | Excellent course: Content, methodology, instructors, mates, everything! | Excellent course: | Content | methodology, instructors, mates, everything! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| raZNrgNGEeaJMgqy4cb6jQ | Wonderful!! I very motivated with the story of the newbie teacher! Very original idea for engaging us with the content! | idea for engaging us with the | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | Great content but animations are annoying! | Great | Content | but animations are annoying! | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | Very interesting course, well designed, using animated fun-makers to shoot out questions that you will probably do it yourself. Course content easy to understand. Very suited for non-accounting major analyst who wants to get some background in accounting analysis.. | will probably do it yourself. Course | Content | easy to understand. Very suited for | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | Content very clear and explained by the professors. | | Content | very clear and explained by the | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | I loved the Accounting part of the course. It was quite hard for me (non-accounting person), however I really enjoyed the form of the lectures and the content itself (the earnings management + its revealing). Great materials Professor Bushee! | form of the lectures and the | Content | itself (the earnings management + its | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | I recommend this course to all my colleagues. Its enriched content certainly helped me to understand things in better way and provided content in structured way, which is I liked most. | to all my colleagues. Its enriched | Content | certainly helped me to understand things | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | I recommend this course to all my colleagues. Its enriched content certainly helped me to understand things in better way and provided content in structured way, which is I liked most. | things in better way and provided | Content | in structured way, which is I | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | While I enjoyed this course and the topics covered, I don't feel like the course content matched what the course description stated it was supposed to. I enrolled in the Business Analytics Specialization course with a focus on analyzing a business from the inside, not outside. Of the 4 weeks of the course, I'd say that only week 4 was valid from an internal perspective but it was kept very high level. I'd say this course could be good for a specialization in business market analysis, but not as advertised. I also found the cartoon classroom questions to be very annoying, almost as bad as fingernails on a blackboard. | I don't feel like the course | Content | matched what the course description stated | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | Very well done! Contents, delivery, clarity, everything was top notch. Thank you! | Very well done! | Content | delivery, clarity, everything was top notch. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | Lot of considerably complex and dry (accounting and statistics!) subject matter covered at a high level without much discussion! Quiz questions are unnecessarily complex - which (IMHO) will discourage / turn off those who are new to this subject matter in completing this course. The last week is pretty interesting though! I am taking the full business analytic course - and find that the quality and complexity of content is all over the place!! Some are way too simple and some are highly complex. | that the quality and complexity of | Content | is all over the place! ! | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | i love this course very much! very practical and systematical content. and very useful for accounting profession but its a little bit challenging to follow. I have watched whole the videos for more than 2 times in order to pass the assignment. | very much! very practical and systematical | Content | and very useful for accounting profession | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | It's ok. Bushee is very knowledgeable and a very enthusiastic teacher, but his lessons are too dense compared to the content in the rest of the Wharton BA programs. I actually like all the detail, but I think it's covered too quickly and the course should probably be made longer to deal with it all. There are ratios and balance sheet jargon just flying at you at a breathless pace. It would be better to focus on a few key ones and then walk through the examples a little more slowly. The quizzes were extremely tricky with too many choose more than one answers. It was difficult to find the parts of the video to review missed questions because 1) the transcripts are machine generated and make it difficult to search specific words and 2) it's difficult to remember where the concept was covered because there was so much in each video. The last week felt very disconnected from the first week and like it belonged in a different course almost. It was pretty good, though. I liked how it contained specific examples and charts. | are too dense compared to the | Content | in the rest of the Wharton | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | good instructors and content , i enjoyed it | good instructors and | Content | , i enjoyed it | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | This is an amazing course. The teachers, the content, the duration, all of those features work great together. I learned a lot. | an amazing course. The teachers, the | Content | the duration, all of those features | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | I am very impressed with presentation and content. This course approaches the skills in a systematic way. It will be beneficial to all levels of users. I strongly recommend for nonnative English speakers. | am very impressed with presentation and | Content | This course approaches the skills in | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | The teacher is very nice. The content of the class is clear to understand. I think it fits people who have little English language using experience but want to improve. I would hope to learn more specific things during the course. | The teacher is very nice. The | Content | of the class is clear to | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | As an advanced English speaker, for me this course goes too little into improvement of pronounciation. The tips for conversations - small talk, phone, online etc. - are only very basic as well. Good course for beginners though and I also liked the interspersal of little questions and tasks along the way (although also too simple imo). Very good - but obviously only paid content - are the teamwork assignments. | good - but obviously only paid | Content | - are the teamwork assignments. | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | It is very useful for both unviersity students and employers and employees at work. The content is a bit short and it will be great if there are more contents on pronunciation and grammar. Thanks! | employers and employees at work. The | Content | is a bit short and it | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | It is very useful for both unviersity students and employers and employees at work. The content is a bit short and it will be great if there are more contents on pronunciation and grammar. Thanks! | be great if there are more | Content | on pronunciation and grammar. Thanks! | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | I have almost completed week one. I learned about what words to stress in a sentence and how to use the innotation at the end of the sentence. It is fun to go through the course contents. I would have given it five stars when it actually have helped us by giving analogies on more conversations formally and informally. Well, thank you. | fun to go through the course | Content | I would have given it five | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Nice abstraction about all kinds of games not about a specific game genre. But I'm not into it because I like developing games more than thinking about design. This course's homework is somewhat irrelevant of the course content. | is somewhat irrelevant of the course | Content | | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | I will review this course appointing its pros and cons. Pros: - The instructor: he is a captivating person. It really seems that he like game development, he make jokes and try to make the course interesting. So, he’s personality is makes the course less boring. Cons: - The course name: when I saw “design” in the course name and the icon of course page, I thought it would be related to graphic design, or history telling and so on. But no, the “design” means “project”. So I think a better name would be “Principles of Game Project”. Although, it might be just me who thought this way, because in my language design means something totally different. - The course content: this course should be at the end of the specialization. It is too much abstract and, in some aspects, very obvious. I will not say it is completely useless, because it is not. It gives us a structured view of the stages of game design and its documentation, but I think it would be better if it was like a case study. - The assignments: probably the worst part of the course. They very very complex, to be sincere, none of the assignments I reviewed were full, I gave max grades to many because I think the person tried really hard to make it. Imagine this situation: you are not a programmer, not a graphic designer, not a writer and with a week you need to make a prototype of the game idea you’ve been working on course. This prototype must show the game mechanics and aesthetics, should be playable… And can be non digital? Come on, we are here learning the concepts of developments digital games and the instructor says that we can make a non digital prototype? Some people did it, and I can say for sure that I couldn’t imagine the real game. I made a digital prototype using the knowledge acquired from the first course, but as you can imagine, it is not enough to make our game ideas come true. - The peer review system: the grading is completely non sense, as I said before, the assignments are complex, so it is difficult to show our ideas clearly in a document, without the abilities to make concept arts or something. In 2 of the 4 assignments 2 of the 3 people gave me max grades and 1 gave me bad grades, and did not left any feedback! One of the assignments when I first submitted it I got 12/20. Then, when I resubmitted it, without changing a comma, I got 20/20. So I think this system must change, maybe the mentor should do it. If you want to do all the specialization, ok, go and do this course. But, if this is not your objective, do not waste your time. | something totally different. - The course | Content | this course should be at the | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | It appears the teacher doesn't take the necessary steps to polish content and tests, everything feels unstructured and ad-lib. Course videos don't seem to follow any kind of logic or purpose and tests are based on highly subjective content, but are not prepared to deal with the subjectivity of reviewers (i.e. forcing them to provide feedback instead of giving points arbitrarily). | take the necessary steps to polish | Content | and tests, everything feels unstructured and | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | It appears the teacher doesn't take the necessary steps to polish content and tests, everything feels unstructured and ad-lib. Course videos don't seem to follow any kind of logic or purpose and tests are based on highly subjective content, but are not prepared to deal with the subjectivity of reviewers (i.e. forcing them to provide feedback instead of giving points arbitrarily). | tests are based on highly subjective | Content | but are not prepared to deal | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Great content and great teacher. But I found the assignments and the quizzes not that great. I reckon the questions and corrections were a bit subjective and time consuming. | Great | Content | and great teacher. But I found | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Not very informative content, some parts are interesting but not worth the money. The worst thing is, all assignments are writting work that are evaluated by colleagues, meaning, it is purely objective, to the extent that one question asks if my uploaded file is in a readable format, example pdf, txt...etc and two out of three marking my pdf file as not!!! and not even leaving a comment why they are giving that bad score on obvious things! | Not very informative | Content | some parts are interesting but not | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Content is interesting but the lectures and the content is far below the first course in the series in my opinion. | | Content | is interesting but the lectures and | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Content is interesting but the lectures and the content is far below the first course in the series in my opinion. | interesting but the lectures and the | Content | is far below the first course | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | This course has some great content and assignments that I'd never make myself do on my own, for that I rate the course highly. I did find myself often wondering exactly what was expected of me on the assignments, and during lecture I'd hear "this is something to think about...", but not what I'd like to hear which is "here's what to do". Overall a great fit into the game development specialization. | This course has some great | Content | and assignments that I'd never make | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Although the course content is highly informative and interesting, the way it's all presented it not the best, most of the time concepts are confusing because of this, quizzes become guessing games most of the time. Forums feel neglected by the course tutor, lot's of question that someone knowledgeable should answer become random rambling as nobody is sure as to what the tutor actually meant. As somebody said on the forums "I feel like I'm alpha testing your course". | Although the course | Content | is highly informative and interesting, the | Positive | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| RKMa0PTnEeSR9SIAC7LYOA | Very rich content, thank you! | Very rich | Content | thank you! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| RKMa0PTnEeSR9SIAC7LYOA | Good content and GREAT assignments. Main problem is that the lecture videos are unscripted and could easily be made more concise. The other thing that worried me was that most of the assignments that I peer reviewed had missed large parts of the question. I would rather have my work marked by people who have read the question properly. | Good | Content | and GREAT assignments. Main problem is | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| RKMa0PTnEeSR9SIAC7LYOA | Pace was slow and I was disappointed by the content level. From the title I thought this would give information about the "global energy business" but the focus is generally on the US, except for portions that discussed location/ use of global resources and demand and supply levels globally. The class begins with analyzing Supply & Demand curves for energy use and production which was interesting to me and I thought meant we'd be taking an economic view throughout. Then the large middle section covers very basic info about the types of energy production (coal, oil, NG, renewables) in the world -- low in factual content considering the time spent on each topic. The final section about political considerations was very basic and only focused on the US. I am amazed that the 3 branches of US government were explained on the simplest level; this is a middle school & high school topic in the US. I expected a more in-depth class with details and analysis about the global energy business. I am glad I did not choose to pay for the certificate. | and I was disappointed by the | Content | level. From the title I thought | Negative | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| RKMa0PTnEeSR9SIAC7LYOA | Pace was slow and I was disappointed by the content level. From the title I thought this would give information about the "global energy business" but the focus is generally on the US, except for portions that discussed location/ use of global resources and demand and supply levels globally. The class begins with analyzing Supply & Demand curves for energy use and production which was interesting to me and I thought meant we'd be taking an economic view throughout. Then the large middle section covers very basic info about the types of energy production (coal, oil, NG, renewables) in the world -- low in factual content considering the time spent on each topic. The final section about political considerations was very basic and only focused on the US. I am amazed that the 3 branches of US government were explained on the simplest level; this is a middle school & high school topic in the US. I expected a more in-depth class with details and analysis about the global energy business. I am glad I did not choose to pay for the certificate. | the world -- low in factual | Content | considering the time spent on each | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| RKMa0PTnEeSR9SIAC7LYOA | generally satisfied with the course content and its execution. Gives a brief, but very qualitative, overview on the issue. Sadly as a citizen of EU, some of the course materials are focused more on the US economy/energy systems, which for me would be much more interesting to see these information about EU. But it is logical, as it is provided by an US institution. Overall I only can recommend to any newcomers to the global energy business or who want to get a little bit deeper knowledge about the issue. | generally satisfied with the course | Content | and its execution. Gives a brief, | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| RKMa0PTnEeSR9SIAC7LYOA | The course content is carefully thought through. The participation contribution is rewarding and the instructor has managed to convey key concepts of the energy business in a few properly executed short videos. It will be great to develop a Specialization around the core areas addressed by this fundamentals course. I will recommend this for anyone interested in understanding keys aspects of the global energy business. | The course | Content | is carefully thought through. The participation | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| RLshf_xsEeWa_RIigsB41Q | Excellent! The best (content, instructors, planning, discussion boards...)! | Excellent! The best | Content | instructors, planning, discussion boards. . . | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| RLshf_xsEeWa_RIigsB41Q | The course is excellent! The content is well prepared and really useful. The teachers are wonderful with their ability to teach, to perform, to transmit information and more yet, to inspire! Teachers able to inspire are not found everywhere. But they are here! Despite to have studied in some of the best institutions of two countries, I never found professors like here as Shane Dixon and Jessica Cinco. Congratulations! More than teach, you inspire! | The course is excellent! The | Content | is well prepared and really useful. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I learned a lot fast in the class - but the assignments seemed very difficult, and often didn't match the content of the lectures. I enjoyed the class, and definitely earned all I learned. | difficult, and often didn't match the | Content | of the lectures. I enjoyed the | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I will break down the review into the contents and comment on them. Before doing that and saving the trouble for people who do not like to read a lot - This course is an awesome kick-starter for R-programming. Video Lectures : The speed and content are just perfect. The concepts covered in each lecture and the manner in which it was taught just made them stick well in my mind. 2. Quiz - They were simple so I infer that they are meant to test how well we have learnt the concepts. 3. Swirl Practice Programming Assignments - A very innovative way to teach us in the R console itself. I really enjoyed playing with it. 4. Programming Assignment - It was a sheer pleasure to do the last assignment. The level was really good. I found it a bit daunting at first but then caught up by reviewing some concepts. 5. Discussion Forums - I couldn't be very active in terms of replying but I never missed to hear what mentors had to say. I owe thanks to mentors for their awesome posts that gave deeper insights especially Al Warren. I highly recommend this course. Prof. Peng - your videos are really good and far from boring. And yes, Thank you Coursera. | break down the review into the | Content | and comment on them. Before doing | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I will break down the review into the contents and comment on them. Before doing that and saving the trouble for people who do not like to read a lot - This course is an awesome kick-starter for R-programming. Video Lectures : The speed and content are just perfect. The concepts covered in each lecture and the manner in which it was taught just made them stick well in my mind. 2. Quiz - They were simple so I infer that they are meant to test how well we have learnt the concepts. 3. Swirl Practice Programming Assignments - A very innovative way to teach us in the R console itself. I really enjoyed playing with it. 4. Programming Assignment - It was a sheer pleasure to do the last assignment. The level was really good. I found it a bit daunting at first but then caught up by reviewing some concepts. 5. Discussion Forums - I couldn't be very active in terms of replying but I never missed to hear what mentors had to say. I owe thanks to mentors for their awesome posts that gave deeper insights especially Al Warren. I highly recommend this course. Prof. Peng - your videos are really good and far from boring. And yes, Thank you Coursera. | Video Lectures : The speed and | Content | are just perfect. The concepts covered | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The course content and the assignments are too far apart. I would have learned more if it was better aligned and there were some exercise in between. | The course | Content | and the assignments are too far | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | So the course is a mixed bag. PROS: The lecture content is useful, albeit a bit dry. I can't give them too much slack for the dryness, after all it's coding. However, they could have shown more real-time coding, rather than just scrolled through powerpoints with the Command Window pasted. You definitely need to have R open when following along with the lectures. The quizzes are also quite useful, as you're required to know both the background of how things work and use the commands learned from the lecture. CONS: The assignments assume you know a lot more than the basic knowledge, and there's no real way to know how to do the assignments just from the lectures. The quizzes tend to be on the easy side and the assignments ramp things up quite quickly. There's no intermediate material to test your skill. You have to have worked in R to have even a minor chance at succeeding on the assignments. | a mixed bag. PROS: The lecture | Content | is useful, albeit a bit dry. | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This course is not set up right, the assignments ask you to do things that aren't explained until the next weeks content, its kind of discouraging. In the end, it does teach you the basics of R, its just too bad that the way to get there is aggravating. The reason I still only give it 2 stars is because of the quality of the courses itself. There are many, many 1 and 2 minute videos, these could've easily been combined. The teacher seems unprepared in his lectures, he stutters and repeats a lot and makes a weird noise between slides. This shouldn't be necessary with pre-recorded lectures. The assignments and quizzes are also poorly written and contain spelling and sloppy mistakes, which doesn't make sense because the material isn't new. It all just makes it seem like the teacher doesn't really care and just wants to sell the course to a lot of people without putting in much effort. If you are not following the specialization I would not advise this course for beginners. I'm quite surprised to see the course get such high ratings. | aren't explained until the next weeks | Content | its kind of discouraging. In the | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Need way more content, and accesibility to begginers, gap between theory and practical exercises is too big! | Need way more | Content | and accesibility to begginers, gap between | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I only finished week one so far. My opinion (to the first week's content) is that it's a little bit hard to familiarize all those basic R concepts from scratch. Maybe the teaching staff would want to make it more concise so that before any real application (or simulation), students do not get lost in those technicalities. However, it's pretty great course. It's pretty detailed and informative. | My opinion (to the first week's | Content | is that it's a little bit | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I think there is something not so important but occupys a large part of this class. Maybe you can rebalance the priority of this the contents in this class and replenish some introductions of more useful functions. | rebalance the priority of this the | Content | in this class and replenish some | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good content , nice flow of information . | Good | Content | , nice flow of information . | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | tutorial contents suit the first timer very well, ofcourse i used the R-programming book for further reading but the contents in this course suited my speed and awareness.. was able to learn R very effectively, specially the swirl was very good experience. | tutorial | Content | suit the first timer very well, | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | tutorial contents suit the first timer very well, ofcourse i used the R-programming book for further reading but the contents in this course suited my speed and awareness.. was able to learn R very effectively, specially the swirl was very good experience. | book for further reading but the | Content | in this course suited my speed | Negative | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Excellent course, but the difficulty of the content can be increased | course, but the difficulty of the | Content | can be increased | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | R Programming has solid information and exercises on just that! However the videos and sections for each week are not very clearly structured. Sometimes the end assignment can take many times the number of hours the rest of the content in a week requires. I'd be careful about taking this course while working unless you can devote serious time to programming projects on your off days. That stated, the course is excellent otherwise. | of hours the rest of the | Content | in a week requires. I'd be | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | There is a high disparity between lecture content and the knowledge required to complete the assignments. It would be great to have a complete walk through of each assignment, showing the different ways in which the same functionality can be created, after having submitted an assignment. This would really had helped me to better understand why something is done in a certain way and improved my understanding of how R works. Currently there is zero feedback on completed assignments, which does not aid learning. | is a high disparity between lecture | Content | and the knowledge required to complete | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This is way too esoteric. The content was delivered way too fast for me to keep up and process it. This needs to be taught with more frequent hands on examples. I'm also not sure why, if auditing, we can't submit and see how we're doing on the learning. I have no way to evaluate if I'm picking up the concepts or not, which is a struggle. Overall, I would not recommend this course for R beginners. I would look elsewhere. | This is way too esoteric. The | Content | was delivered way too fast for | Negative | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | nice content..understandable. | nice | Content | . understandable. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This course is the worst course that I have taken so far. I am not happy with the course content and the way that the lecturer uses to teach this course. I really want to refund my money! | am not happy with the course | Content | and the way that the lecturer | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Great content delivered at a solid pace. | Great | Content | delivered at a solid pace. | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | not the model of learning that is encouraging or sticks. hard for a student (even one who has a programming background) to sit through hours of slides explaining what the functions and definitions in the language do without a layer of use context upfront. The content jumps from specific examples to unrelated specific definitions without carrying a sense of integrating the new knowledge with any past knowledge in the course. the whole course seems disjointed. would have been much more effective as learning through examples and to be taught functions and definitions as they come up in problem solving. | layer of use context upfront. The | Content | jumps from specific examples to unrelated | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good Content to learn programming language. | Good | Content | to learn programming language. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Thought this course could've been much more effective. The content felt very random and esoteric at times. Especially the programming assignment on cached results. I get it. I'm a programmer at heart. But this is at the margin of usefulness. How about a segment on running regressions? Or doing some real data analysis? | could've been much more effective. The | Content | felt very random and esoteric at | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This is probably the most pedagogically inept course I have ever enrolled on. Although the content is what you would hope to find in such a course, the delivery of it is outrageously bad. When to complete your assignment, Google becomes your best friend rather than your lecture notes, you know that something is wrong. The idea that a baby thrown in the water may just learn to swim rather than drown is pedagogically retarded. Unfortunately, this seems to be the approach here... | have ever enrolled on. Although the | Content | is what you would hope to | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The difficulty of the assignments increases fairly dramatically week over week. It might be more productive to scale this content more gently by dividing it into a two-part course? | be more productive to scale this | Content | more gently by dividing it into | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Some disconnects between assignments and lectures but you'll find that in a lot of classroom settings. Otherwise fantastic content about the basics of R Programming and the environment thereof. | lot of classroom settings. Otherwise fantastic | Content | about the basics of R Programming | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Assignment is a bit too hard for entry level students, especially if we have to complete it in a week considering some students might be full time employees or students. However, assignment is very good for practice. Might consider adding more contents to let students learn more about build their own functions. | for practice. Might consider adding more | Content | to let students learn more about | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Assignments don't always align to the course content.... In terms of usefulness and coverage of this course, this really is just the basics of R. | don't always align to the course | Content | . . . In terms of | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The content was great, especially the swirl() library. The instructions were a little confusing at times, but the online advisors helped to sort it out. | The | Content | was great, especially the swirl() library. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The content and the speed that they teach you R are actually good. But considering that we now have to pay 45€/49$ for the course you will expect more polished videos and quizzes. Some of the videos are just stutters, repetitions and filling words. It's seems like they have been in a rush without decent preparation. Also one of the quiz questions was simply wrong. This should be fixed. Furthermore some of the commands they present are deprecated and cannot be used anymore. | The | Content | and the speed that they teach | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very essential topics, but the instructor's delivery of content is inconsistent, glosses over explanations at time, "umms and arrrs" a lot, talks extremely fast at times. Making this course quite hard to follow. Disclosure: English if my first language. Not new to programming. Not new to MOOC courses. | topics, but the instructor's delivery of | Content | is inconsistent, glosses over explanations at | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Swirl is an amazing addition to the course! Easy to learn, great content | the course! Easy to learn, great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Really enjoy this course even i have done lot of programming and expert in other language but content is good and very easy to understand | and expert in other language but | Content | is good and very easy to | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Excellent course content and delivery. It has kick started me to move on my own pace and dive down into data sciences. | Excellent course | Content | and delivery. It has kick started | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The video lectures were engaging with interesting tidbits thrown in to make the potentially dull topic not dull. I personally liked the rhythm and pace with which Dr Peng delivered the content. Also, the swirl exercises are a critical element of this course and I often found it effective to sandwich the swirl exercises between the video and the quiz. Doing this provided an incentive to complete the swirl practice and also made the quiz/assignment less of an exercise in 'dart-throwing' and more of validating what you've learned. Overall, great course to get started with R! | with which Dr Peng delivered the | Content | Also, the swirl exercises are a | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very useful and practical content. | Very useful and practical | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The lectures are clear and exhaustive. Assignments and quizzes perfectly compliment the content and aptly test the learning. Definitely recommended to anyone who wants to learn. | Assignments and quizzes perfectly compliment the | Content | and aptly test the learning. Definitely | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | i generally think the course needs a lot of improvement as after week 1 the assignments and quizzes don't seem to relate to the course content. we are at very different levels so a more gentle easing and explanation of ideas is necessary other than this apparent quantum leap from one stage to the next. i have had to do a different course else where and i am getting the sort of good introduction into the R language, its not practical to expect everyone to understand the ideas in 4 weeks.programming is hard enough as it is. | seem to relate to the course | Content | we are at very different levels | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The content is superbly designer for a beginner. The Swirl assignments need to make compulsory. Infact they contributed more to the learning process. More Swirl contents will make the course richer. | The | Content | is superbly designer for a beginner. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The content is superbly designer for a beginner. The Swirl assignments need to make compulsory. Infact they contributed more to the learning process. More Swirl contents will make the course richer. | to the learning process. More Swirl | Content | will make the course richer. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This is a challenging course because there is a marked gap between the video lectures and the weekly assignments. This course will be far more demanding of your time and willingness to fail that the Data Scientist's Toolbox. If you have the time and resilience to search out support materials and frequently peruse the Discussion threads, you will be able to find what you need. My peers with programming experience confirmed that there is too wide a gap between the content delivered in the video lectures and the demands of the coding assignments. If you decide to take this course, be sure to do the swirl exercises so you get a feel of how the R functions work. When you grade your peers' work, you might notice that more than a few decided to plagiarize code from others. The videos need to be redone. Effective instructors know that students learn by seeing examples, not by listening to broad descriptions of what a function can do. | too wide a gap between the | Content | delivered in the video lectures and | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Great course. However, more examples in the contents would be really useful. | course. However, more examples in the | Content | would be really useful. | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very good introduction to programming with R. Surprisingly large amount of content for short period of time | with R. Surprisingly large amount of | Content | for short period of time | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Very interesting course content. also the way of presenting/discussing it is great! | Very interesting course | Content | also the way of presenting/discussing it | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Excellent course, great professor and very good quality content. Thank you | great professor and very good quality | Content | Thank you | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | I just finished this course. I want to give a frank feedback since I see a lot of untapped possibilities in this course. On the strengths, it began with a high note and got me glued with expectations and promises. The instructor sounded extremely comfortable and confident with her subject, and had a very calming and pleasant presence which helped establish a kind of "remote" trust. On the improvement areas, I however have a few to list. For one, the intensity, rigour and to-the-pointedness of the content sharply fell after the first week. Having known about mindfulness, Metta meditations, gratitude, it became personally disappointing to me how this course conveyed so little about them and impacted so less than can be possible with the time and space alloted. The framework which initially looked hopeful is perhaps not the best framework, as much as is said about this not being "spectator course". Because this format diluted the intensity and possibility of the course, making it drag and bore towards the end. I wish there were guest interviews of more experienced academicians than what happened here as interviews from which there was little to learn. Honestly, this is my 4th of 5th course on positive psychology and this one will have to make many a fixes to any other that I've taken on coursera. The course ended and I find myself not a tad upbeater or nourished, or knowing something useful that I did not know already other than about vegas nerves which really did not make sense to end user who are here to know what and how to do things and feel better. | intensity, rigour and to-the-pointedness of the | Content | sharply fell after the first week. | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Thank you so much Barbara. So much of your course content resonated with how I try to live my life and connect with people I encounter. The science behind it is very encouraging and validates that approach and to keep moving and growing in that direction. | Barbara. So much of your course | Content | resonated with how I try to | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Great content, but too much video for me since i prefer reading about it. | Great | Content | but too much video for me | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | It could have been more dynamic . The interviews were boring and there wasn't enough content. | were boring and there wasn't enough | Content | | Negative | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Great content and well presented, learned a lot and enjoyed the lessons. Thanks for making this available. | Great | Content | and well presented, learned a lot | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | I loved it - great content, a a gentle and easy to understand way of teaching. Prof. Freadricson did a great job making it actionable a came with lots of great ideas for practising positive psych. everyday. Lots of great stuff for my work shops and courses in stress manegement and happiness. Thank you! Stine Schmidt | I loved it - great | Content | a a gentle and easy to | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Great class, interesting content. Thank you!! | Great class, interesting | Content | Thank you! ! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | This has augmented impact; it takes you through positive psychology contents smoothly to train you and absorbs the concepts and theories in one to one classroom environment; and simultaneously puts you on the way to change and inculcate the POSITIVE attitude by enhancing the awareness at inner level....... Thanks for the course. ONE should also go for Certificate since it is NOT easy to get the same, and that adds VALUE to it. Henceforth, when an applicant would submit Coursera Certificate, I would certainly give weightage at par with Traditionally earned University Certificate. | it takes you through positive psychology | Content | smoothly to train you and absorbs | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | I have truly enjoyed the format and content of this course! Excellent! | have truly enjoyed the format and | Content | of this course! Excellent! | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | It's a good course and the contents are very helpful. There are important components like negativity bias and loving-kindness meditation. However I somehow feel it lacks a more systematic or scientific approach since lots of the materials goes on with a free and open discussion that very much depends on subjective views or feelings of selected individuals who joined the discussion. Take another example, "What is Love" session clearly depends an individual's own view. It contradicts "triangular theory of love" and the lecturer doesn't even explain why. | It's a good course and the | Content | are very helpful. There are important | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Very well presented and excellent content. | Very well presented and excellent | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Covers basics well. The video lectures are easy and simple to understand. Liked the assignments and they covered the learned content well. | assignments and they covered the learned | Content | well. | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | It's great that this specialization now get autoGrading for projects. It could be better if the Content Quiz is more challenging. | It could be better if the | Content | Quiz is more challenging. | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | The content includes interesting and useful Java programming examples. The lecturers are generally on top of their subject matter and can speak confidently without visible notes. The tests are thorough and you won't get away with only half-knowledge. If you take all the lectures and study the slides, you will generally get to the necessary level of understanding. | The | Content | includes interesting and useful Java programming | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Awesome! Excellent methodology and contents! It goes to the point. Assignments are cool and help to understand the concepts. Perhaps, I found it a little bit easy, but this is also good because I can adapt my tight schedule to follow the deadlines while also remain motivated. ;-) | Awesome! Excellent methodology and | Content | It goes to the point. Assignments | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | I really liked this course and the way it was taught. Although I am a CS major, I really learnt a lot of other stuff from this course apart from learning the core content of Data Structures. | course apart from learning the core | Content | of Data Structures. | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | The content that has been showed through this course is enough balanced and sufficient to help learners around the world like me to understand clearly Data Structures with java and also for with the other programming languages. | The | Content | that has been showed through this | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Interesting approach of core and support tracks! Great content. | of core and support tracks! Great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| rQhCYyaKEeW6YBLN1oULHQ | Exceptional teacher! Great content :D | Exceptional teacher! Great | Content | :D | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| rQhCYyaKEeW6YBLN1oULHQ | Amazing contents in spanish. | Amazing | Content | in spanish. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Rqo3iKNbEeWiwAqQT7MHVQ | Great content and great professor! Best course.. Thanks! | Great | Content | and great professor! Best course. . | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Rqo3iKNbEeWiwAqQT7MHVQ | Excellent course as far as content is concerned. However, the older Coursera format was way more user-friendly. Also the discussion topics were not arranged appropriately as in the previous modules in this specialization. PDFs of assignments would be helpful if posted. | Excellent course as far as | Content | is concerned. However, the older Coursera | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | interesting and useful content. very vivid videos | interesting and useful | Content | very vivid videos | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Great course with great content!! I learnt a lot! But it takes much more time than 4-5h a week as is stated at course info. | Great course with great | Content | ! I learnt a lot! But | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | It was a really good course, very easy to understand and was good in keeping the interest up. I would only recommend they offered some, at least optional, exercises to help grasp the content. | optional, exercises to help grasp the | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Great course! I felt like of the basic nuts and bolts. A lot of the assignments called for evaluating actual social science studies which I found very helpful as it gave me an opportunity to apply the content I learned in the video modules. | me an opportunity to apply the | Content | I learned in the video modules. | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | I have to say thanks to Dr Annemarie Zand Scholten. I can feel how much efforts she had put into the lectures. Complex contents are simplified and easy to learn even for a non-native English speaker like me. I'm happy because I joint this course, very useful, an enjoyable experience. | had put into the lectures. Complex | Content | are simplified and easy to learn | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Excellent organisation of the course! The content is also well thought and presented. i personally clarified many vague questions related to variables, measurements and research ethics. I did have the quantitative methods course at the university, in any case some blank spots were left, so this course was helpful. It is a useful course for revising, but I do not know how total beginners feel about it. If I were a beginner I would have some difficulties probably. It could relate to my personal "slowness" to grasp material like this. Thank you Annemarie! I really like your lecturing/teaching style. | Excellent organisation of the course! The | Content | is also well thought and presented. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | This course provided a great experiece of online study. The high quality content of the videos and adequate rithym of assignments and quizzes are features that make it an admirable course. I strongly reccomend doing this course if you are still in doubt. | of online study. The high quality | Content | of the videos and adequate rithym | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Good Course. It should be complemented with reading of Neuman, Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Social Science, which gives a far better overview of the contents of week 1 and 2 (insights into the scientific method). Nevertheless the rest of the weeks are very good and should provide a great framework of Quantitative methods for a undergraduate student, who can then complement this framework with some detailed additional readings, if it is of his liking. All in all, I really ended my fisrt college semester with an excellent knowledge in quantitative methods, for which I have to thank, in part to Miss Scholten for this wonderful course. | a far better overview of the | Content | of week 1 and 2 (insights | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | This course is excellent! I found the content of very high quality, the lecture videos are very clear and easy to understand. What I find remarkable however, is the quality of the exams and assignments! The staff have put in a lot of effort in creating questions and assignments which really test your understanding and knowledge with a clever marking system which always works out to give you a fair mark even when the assignments are peer reviewed. Well done to Anne-Marie and the other staff who put together this course :) | course is excellent! I found the | Content | of very high quality, the lecture | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Funny, useful, clear and serious too. I loved it. Many methodology courses before, but this one addresses also ethics on research practices and History of philosophy of science. simply I adored it and learned a lot. I strongly recommend it. It is so useful for my work and my everyday life. Interviews with real researchers and revising real publications helped me to conect contents with my inmediate reality.. Thanks to all team and congratulations for such a great course. | real publications helped me to conect | Content | with my inmediate reality. . Thanks | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Really enriching course material and the method of explaining by Annemarie Zand Scholten. It gave me a good overview of the quantitative approach to contrast it with the qualitative approach i have been following at my workplace. The course material is very comprehensive and also the transcripts provided for each module. The detailed word to word transcripts really help to revise material while doing assignments and preparing for exams. The assignments really makes one think and helps to digest the course material in the process. The concepts and style of illustrations used in the video are also extremely helpful to understand the content heavy topic. The bonus video material provide the completeness due to the applied examples discussed in them. Overall a very satisfying learning experience! Great! | also extremely helpful to understand the | Content | heavy topic. The bonus video material | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Great content and delivered in a clear way. | Great | Content | and delivered in a clear way. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Excellent course!!! Very well explained, clear examples, good and rich content This is a MUST DO one!!! | explained, clear examples, good and rich | Content | This is a MUST DO one! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Excellent content, delivery and assessment | Excellent | Content | delivery and assessment | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Excellent! The course is extremely well thought over and executed, even in minor aspects of the course, like scripts, additional pieces of information, exams, created just for practice with feedback, great exercises. The content is highly relevant, well structured and illustrated, clearly laid out. The course is very challenging, thought provoking and stimulating, though it is not an easy course. | practice with feedback, great exercises. The | Content | is highly relevant, well structured and | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| ru6DZ3Q6EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Very light and comprehensive content. The geology part is pretty well explained! | Very light and comprehensive | Content | The geology part is pretty well | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| ru6DZ3Q6EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Typical of UofA MOOC's, very high quality. Excellent content. Well paced. | UofA MOOC's, very high quality. Excellent | Content | Well paced. | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| rwRs6Tn9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | It was worth taking just for the code examples and understanding the how to combine multiple process and applications. This course overall was great and provided the right combinations to ensure success such as appropriate timelines, content, and costs. | ensure success such as appropriate timelines, | Content | and costs. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| s5sEkwAHEeW9ISIACxWDhA | I loved this course. Michael Roth was superb in repacking the challenging content in an engaging and enthralling manner. | was superb in repacking the challenging | Content | in an engaging and enthralling manner. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| SAZf_ay2EeS5uiIACk-Zyg | Very thorough and interactive. I appreciate the expertise from multiple backgrounds, which has allowed me, as someone inexperienced in epidemiology, to have a general understanding of the topic. Thank-you and I look forward to seeing more content from you! | I look forward to seeing more | Content | from you! | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| SAZf_ay2EeS5uiIACk-Zyg | The test difficulty was a lot easier than the actual course content. | lot easier than the actual course | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| SAZf_ay2EeS5uiIACk-Zyg | Fantastic Course! great content and compelling presenters. It really opens your eyes to infectious diseases and all perspectives it braces, science, social aspects, biology, ecology. I recommend for bio/science folks. | Fantastic Course! great | Content | and compelling presenters. It really opens | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| SAZf_ay2EeS5uiIACk-Zyg | Was an interesting course but, at least to me, seemed to lack relevant material I was hoping for. When Addressing the concepts of Ebola, SARS, or the concepts of anti-vaccination the content was vague. But overall I thought the course was very informative on the concepts of how infections can spread and how we can track the movements in order to help control infection rates. I will definitely be going back to rewatch some of these lectures in the future. | or the concepts of anti-vaccination the | Content | was vague. But overall I thought | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| SAZf_ay2EeS5uiIACk-Zyg | Great content presented in a very comprehensive way! | Great | Content | presented in a very comprehensive way! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| SAZf_ay2EeS5uiIACk-Zyg | I really like the way the videos are prepared. It had to take a lot of work, but I love those drawings. It makes it look alive. I like the content as well. It is well structured and well presented. Thank you so much!!!! | it look alive. I like the | Content | as well. It is well structured | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Content is good, but exercises could be improved, should also add a few interactive quizzes (e.g. a quiz before the segment to ask what they think are the 3 - 4 factors of X,Y,Z; then a quiz at end to summarize). Also add sources. | | Content | is good, but exercises could be | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | The content is laid out very well and I found a ton of useful take-away points. Thank you to all the faculty members. I particularly enjoyed the assignments - they really make you think. But I found the branding you - audit and insights the best exercise in this program. I would definitely recommend this to friends and colleagues. | The | Content | is laid out very well and | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | The course content was very good. However, I would have liked to see assignments for each | The course | Content | was very good. However, I would | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Excellent content! | Excellent | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | I think that this course could have more content. | that this course could have more | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Excellent course. Concise and to the point. Maximum learning with differentiated, relevant, and authentic content. | learning with differentiated, relevant, and authentic | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | The topic was so intersting but the content was not enought practical! | topic was so intersting but the | Content | was not enought practical! | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Content is grade, however I am still waiting for the grading of my last assignment in this course. :( | | Content | is grade, however I am still | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Great content for beginners. Especially appreciated given that the topic is not yet well covered by MOOCs. | Great | Content | for beginners. Especially appreciated given that | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Instructor was passionate and clear to understand. She made the course enjoyable and the course content easy to digest | the course enjoyable and the course | Content | easy to digest | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | It is very easy to realize the course content and also provides practical tools to go. | very easy to realize the course | Content | and also provides practical tools to | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Challenging, thorough and engaging. Repetitive in a good way, by gently going back over content you almost learn by default. The quizzes are professionally prepared and sometimes tough to pass! This is good as you are obliged to think hard, even go back through materials or ask others for advice until the knowledge sticks. Highly recommended and of great practical value. | way, by gently going back over | Content | you almost learn by default. The | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | The content is great, and the lectures are clear, but this course was made in a rush: there are many bugs throughout the quizzes and there is no contact at all with the lecturer in the forums, and there is no teaching stuff present in the forums. | The | Content | is great, and the lectures are | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Good content, but blocked quizes in free version is bad idea. | Good | Content | but blocked quizes in free version | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Excellent content, but I would prefer the assignments be evaluated and rated by experts, not the colleagues. | Excellent | Content | but I would prefer the assignments | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Very good course. Awesome content. | Very good course. Awesome | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Very good content but it only gives a general view on each topic not going too deep on technical SEO and keyword research. | Very good | Content | but it only gives a general | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Excellent course contents and a logical structured organization of the topics. | Excellent course | Content | and a logical structured organization of | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Very poor. Full of errors in videos and quizzes (which affect final grade), no response from course organizers in the forum to multiple complaints from learners, and extremely thin on content. Could have been merged into the first course of the specialization (Introduction to SEO). I've taken $49 one-off certificate classes that provided 4-10 hours of content for 6-8 weeks; for this course I was charged $119 for 1-3 hours of content for what was supposed to be 4 weeks. I completed the course in a couple of days and felt like I learned more from free resources like Moz. Complete rip-off and easily the worse course of the half dozen I've taken on Coursera on various topics. It seems like you're paying for the UC Davis name on the certificates rather than the content. In addition to all that they dropped the price from $119 to $79 per course for the specialization after I paid for it, and refuse to refund the price difference. Fine - but if I'm paying a premium price I expect much better content and service than was received. | from learners, and extremely thin on | Content | Could have been merged into the | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Very poor. Full of errors in videos and quizzes (which affect final grade), no response from course organizers in the forum to multiple complaints from learners, and extremely thin on content. Could have been merged into the first course of the specialization (Introduction to SEO). I've taken $49 one-off certificate classes that provided 4-10 hours of content for 6-8 weeks; for this course I was charged $119 for 1-3 hours of content for what was supposed to be 4 weeks. I completed the course in a couple of days and felt like I learned more from free resources like Moz. Complete rip-off and easily the worse course of the half dozen I've taken on Coursera on various topics. It seems like you're paying for the UC Davis name on the certificates rather than the content. In addition to all that they dropped the price from $119 to $79 per course for the specialization after I paid for it, and refuse to refund the price difference. Fine - but if I'm paying a premium price I expect much better content and service than was received. | classes that provided 4-10 hours of | Content | for 6-8 weeks; for this course | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Very poor. Full of errors in videos and quizzes (which affect final grade), no response from course organizers in the forum to multiple complaints from learners, and extremely thin on content. Could have been merged into the first course of the specialization (Introduction to SEO). I've taken $49 one-off certificate classes that provided 4-10 hours of content for 6-8 weeks; for this course I was charged $119 for 1-3 hours of content for what was supposed to be 4 weeks. I completed the course in a couple of days and felt like I learned more from free resources like Moz. Complete rip-off and easily the worse course of the half dozen I've taken on Coursera on various topics. It seems like you're paying for the UC Davis name on the certificates rather than the content. In addition to all that they dropped the price from $119 to $79 per course for the specialization after I paid for it, and refuse to refund the price difference. Fine - but if I'm paying a premium price I expect much better content and service than was received. | charged $119 for 1-3 hours of | Content | for what was supposed to be | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Very poor. Full of errors in videos and quizzes (which affect final grade), no response from course organizers in the forum to multiple complaints from learners, and extremely thin on content. Could have been merged into the first course of the specialization (Introduction to SEO). I've taken $49 one-off certificate classes that provided 4-10 hours of content for 6-8 weeks; for this course I was charged $119 for 1-3 hours of content for what was supposed to be 4 weeks. I completed the course in a couple of days and felt like I learned more from free resources like Moz. Complete rip-off and easily the worse course of the half dozen I've taken on Coursera on various topics. It seems like you're paying for the UC Davis name on the certificates rather than the content. In addition to all that they dropped the price from $119 to $79 per course for the specialization after I paid for it, and refuse to refund the price difference. Fine - but if I'm paying a premium price I expect much better content and service than was received. | on the certificates rather than the | Content | In addition to all that they | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Very poor. Full of errors in videos and quizzes (which affect final grade), no response from course organizers in the forum to multiple complaints from learners, and extremely thin on content. Could have been merged into the first course of the specialization (Introduction to SEO). I've taken $49 one-off certificate classes that provided 4-10 hours of content for 6-8 weeks; for this course I was charged $119 for 1-3 hours of content for what was supposed to be 4 weeks. I completed the course in a couple of days and felt like I learned more from free resources like Moz. Complete rip-off and easily the worse course of the half dozen I've taken on Coursera on various topics. It seems like you're paying for the UC Davis name on the certificates rather than the content. In addition to all that they dropped the price from $119 to $79 per course for the specialization after I paid for it, and refuse to refund the price difference. Fine - but if I'm paying a premium price I expect much better content and service than was received. | premium price I expect much better | Content | and service than was received. | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| sHs1AyWUEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | The content and the assignment were of high quality and I really enjoyed the case I had to work on. So overal the course was very good, but negative was that the course was a bit too long, I understand Coursera needs to finance the course, so it is better to have a long one and earn a lot of subscription fees. Bu the extra review rounds felt redundant, and because the course was so long it was difficult to keep focussed on it. | The | Content | and the assignment were of high | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| sHs1AyWUEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Being in this class and specialization was a great experience to me. Great instructors with great content but I prefer a professional person judge the final assignment of capstone. | to me. Great instructors with great | Content | but I prefer a professional person | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| shV98lfdEeWT8xIUiEQHHQ | Intended for Non-native English speakers, or English speakers without a strong literary background, 'Scholarly Communication' gives an overview of how to construct coherent arguments for academic publication. There are multiple typos and presentation issues throughout the course; however, they do not necessarily detract from the content of the course. | do not necessarily detract from the | Content | of the course. | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| sIhBvix6EeWccAqzeA4VPw | Wonderful course, I'm really satisfied with all the content, the material and the way to learn, step by step. | I'm really satisfied with all the | Content | the material and the way to | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| sK74dCWgEeW8-A6tkjXxWQ | Exceptional content that approaches important aspects of leadership. | Exceptional | Content | that approaches important aspects of leadership. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| sK74dCWgEeW8-A6tkjXxWQ | A very comprehensive Leadership development program. Course content is very relevant, detailed and updated. I personally had good learning from the program. Excellent instructors. | very comprehensive Leadership development program. Course | Content | is very relevant, detailed and updated. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| sK74dCWgEeW8-A6tkjXxWQ | Really enjoying the course. Lots of great content and I like the variety of ways the material is presented. | enjoying the course. Lots of great | Content | and I like the variety of | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| sK74dCWgEeW8-A6tkjXxWQ | The contents in this course are comprehensive, and up to date. The course was ran with a | The | Content | in this course are comprehensive, and | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| sK74dCWgEeW8-A6tkjXxWQ | Modern and very relevant! Great course with great content. Cool and very realistic story line presented in videos. A few dead links that need to be addressed. | very relevant! Great course with great | Content | Cool and very realistic story line | Positive | 0.9 | 4.0 |
| sK74dCWgEeW8-A6tkjXxWQ | Innovative course content delivered with dramatized episodes. Definitely one of the best courses out there. | Innovative course | Content | delivered with dramatized episodes. Definitely one | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| sK74dCWgEeW8-A6tkjXxWQ | This is the most awesome course! I love the videos before each module. The lecturers clearly put a lot of time and energy into the course content, which is so interesting. | time and energy into the course | Content | which is so interesting. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The explainations are a bit hard to follow if you are in a hurry, some times the course concepts just jump onto you. The techniques and content are really really great and very relavent, but the instructional value can be further ehnanced. | jump onto you. The techniques and | Content | are really really great and very | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The title & the course content are not in sync. The expectation was to learn analysis in Excel and maybe learn some functions which can be used regularly for data manipulations and/or analysis. But the course tries to teach statistical modeling using Excel, for which there are other better tools available or even easier ways to do it in Excel itself. For e.g. Regression can be done using the Data Analysis Toolpak. Finally justice has not been done to both! It would be better if the course tries to focus on 1 objective - Excel or Statistical modeling, and do justice to that completely. | The title & the course | Content | are not in sync. The expectation | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The order and content of the lessons wasn't planned with sufficient care. | The order and | Content | of the lessons wasn't planned with | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Quiz does not require hands-on experience of creating templates but rather simply plugging in numbers. Students may forget most of the content after finishing the quiz. | Students may forget most of the | Content | after finishing the quiz. | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Really wanted to take this class. Unfortunately, I believe it is more about advanced statistics then excel. It was advertised as a beginners class and that is not the case. I recommend having a significant knowledge of statistics before taking this course. I'm a 15 year senior level accounting executive and I was easily spending 10 to 15 hours a week plus watching the videos 3 or 4 times each in order to understand the content. It was very difficult to understand. Disappointing. | each in order to understand the | Content | It was very difficult to understand. | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Great contents and teachers! | Great | Content | and teachers! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The title is very misleading. Excel is an afterthought for this course; instead there is a heavy focus on statistics. The class claims to be for beginners, but that is clearly not the case, as it requires previous knowledge in inferential statistics and calculus. Excel is hardly used and is certainly not the focus; there are weeks where Excel is not used at all. There are no practice assignments, only quizzes. It's clear that this course is outdated and poorly maintained, as the videos refer to examples that are not included or content that was not presented. Needless to say, I will not be taking any other courses in this specialization. | examples that are not included or | Content | that was not presented. Needless to | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Excellent content, learned many new things. Mainly new tools in Excel with the Solver. | Excellent | Content | learned many new things. Mainly new | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The course structure is not thoughtfully prepared. There is a lot of confusion around what the instructor wants to say. The practice quizzes and course content have no match whatsoever | say. The practice quizzes and course | Content | have no match whatsoever | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good content but badly structured | Good | Content | but badly structured | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Dr Eggers is a tremendous professor. The course has wit and application along with assignments that are well scaffolded to the learning content. Highly recommend this class. | are well scaffolded to the learning | Content | Highly recommend this class. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | I am sorry to say this, but the tutorial could have been organzied in a much more serious way. I do not know how much time the Professors have put on preparation. But it gives me a "sloppy" impression!!! The class carries the name of University of Duke and 70 euros are charged, so I think the learners would reasonably expect to see that the teacher puts lots of time to organize the course structure, in order to efficiently give as much as information to the learners within limited time! For example, I believe nobody would not say that the Week 2 content on confusion matrix is very consistently explained. And this is just one example. | not say that the Week 2 | Content | on confusion matrix is very consistently | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Content is not well organized, videos are disconnected from one another, explanations are not clear, spreadsheets contain vast information that is not explained anywhere. It is been quite difficult to follow through the course and I bet many students are giving up. | | Content | is not well organized, videos are | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | This course contains too few solid content. | This course contains too few solid | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The content of the course was good. However, I did not like the presentation of the material, moreover such a topic would need to be covered by a longer duration course. | The | Content | of the course was good. However, | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | I missed some more content in certain areas of the course (i.e. histograms). Apart from that, great course and great explanations by Daniel Egger! | I missed some more | Content | in certain areas of the course | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Like the course content. Though I know lot many function in Excel, but solve was new and kind a unique one. | Like the course | Content | Though I know lot many function | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Unfortunately, the material and lectures of this course fell short of my expectations. Lectures don't follow a logical path and are all over the place, and some concepts are not expanded as required. Overall, I believe they need to improve how the content is presented, and how it's applied in a real world context. | they need to improve how the | Content | is presented, and how it's applied | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good content and practical examples. | Good | Content | and practical examples. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good content, some materials were difficult but the video lecture were rushed. | Good | Content | some materials were difficult but the | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Content not discussed in proper detail. Instructor skims over the concepts. Its difficult to follow. | | Content | not discussed in proper detail. Instructor | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The content is really interesting and useful. However, the way in which the lessons are organised I'd say is confusing. The professor explain you complex concepts like entropy or binary classification to continue with an excel worksheet. It's here where the issue relays, the excel files are filled and instead of learning by doing you have to figure out how the prof made the file. In consequence, the solution is always available. In my opinion, it'd be better if a raw data set is given and you build the model step by step from the scratch. | The | Content | is really interesting and useful. However, | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Course contents are rather deep which is good and makes it challenging. Explanations could be better and there should be more content on some topics for better understanding. Someone with background in statistics would find this course more useful than on who only has basic knowledge of statistics. Nevertheless, it inspired me to learn from other sources to fill the gaps in my understanding. | Course | Content | are rather deep which is good | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Course contents are rather deep which is good and makes it challenging. Explanations could be better and there should be more content on some topics for better understanding. Someone with background in statistics would find this course more useful than on who only has basic knowledge of statistics. Nevertheless, it inspired me to learn from other sources to fill the gaps in my understanding. | better and there should be more | Content | on some topics for better understanding. | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Much work needs to be done on this course to make it friendly to learners. The quizzes and assignments do not align with what is taught in the lessons. Further, the content in the lessons does not even show or explain what is expected from the learning. I spent the majority of my time exploring the discussions to discover what I was supposed to be doing and the rest of it on Google teaching myself the concepts that were not taught in the course. | taught in the lessons. Further, the | Content | in the lessons does not even | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Great course, great professor and great TA in community discussion. Can't give 5 stars as course introduction and content are not really matching. As per introduction anybody can take and learn this course, but indeed it is far from reality. If you don't have good math and statistic background then you better learn them first... I personally learnt a lot from this course even though could not get the certificate. Thanks everyone. | 5 stars as course introduction and | Content | are not really matching. As per | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | No need to learn Excel so I'm to focus on the content. The professor examples are clear and like that he provides different perspectives to looking at a problem and makes it visual as well in order to conceptualized the idea first so I can commit it to my mind. | so I'm to focus on the | Content | The professor examples are clear and | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The course deserves a 5-star rating because: (1) content is relevant, (2) the professor is concise and possesses great teaching skills, and (3) the learning modules are applicable to daily problems. | deserves a 5-star rating because: (1) | Content | is relevant, (2) the professor is | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| SrM6V-3pEeSJZSIAC0gHUg | Good course, interesting theory, opens up a new thinking process for planning classes. The dual purpose classes, i.e. content plus the development of some of those characters strengths discussed in the course will certainly be much more problematic than presented; also the evaluation of character strengths will certainly be problematic for some time to come, but the course is till worth taking. | The dual purpose classes, i. e. | Content | plus the development of some of | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| SrM6V-3pEeSJZSIAC0gHUg | Practical and immediately applicable - language and activities to start your positive classroom. Participants are dedicated and the assignments offer insightful opportunities to explore concepts and create content for your classroom. | opportunities to explore concepts and create | Content | for your classroom. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| SrM6V-3pEeSJZSIAC0gHUg | The contents have been very useful for applying in the classes, especially when working wiht teenagers. | The | Content | have been very useful for applying | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| SrM6V-3pEeSJZSIAC0gHUg | Usable information, well presented, very accessible. Videos of teachers in class add a great deal to the content. | add a great deal to the | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| SrM6V-3pEeSJZSIAC0gHUg | I've done a few online courses on various, and for me, this is poor. The content is gratingly simplified, the delivery worse. The instructions for the assignments are impenetrable at best. Unfortunately, I can't gain those moments that I've spent on this course back. | for me, this is poor. The | Content | is gratingly simplified, the delivery worse. | Negative | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| SrM6V-3pEeSJZSIAC0gHUg | I am really enjoying the course, I like the content, the instructor and the interviews! | enjoying the course, I like the | Content | the instructor and the interviews! | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| SrM6V-3pEeSJZSIAC0gHUg | Fun, down-to-earth, with great interviews with awesome researchers! Levin is energetic and he gives very good advice that really help you practice the content in the course. | that really help you practice the | Content | in the course. | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| svzDI2FSEeW6DxKCi866Kw | While focused on the subject of public health systems, this course is also a good experience for anybody who is simply interested in the benefits of systems thinking and the applications of causal models. While there are a few hiccups in the course content (a couple files not available as of Mar 2016), the overall experience here is excellent. The instructors break down each topic into understandable elements and provide excellent real world examples. Overall, I greatly enjoyed this course and recommend it to others. | a few hiccups in the course | Content | (a couple files not available as | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| SxjkGailEeSy_SIAC49HnA | Extremely well done. Offers a great reading list. Videos including author interviews add significantly to the course content. | interviews add significantly to the course | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| sxMQEV4hEeSF2SIACy-E9A | Loved the variety of content, instructors & format. I also loved checking in regarding our own responses to the information. | Loved the variety of | Content | instructors & format. I also loved | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| sxMQEV4hEeSF2SIACy-E9A | Very interesting, love it. Just a constructive criticism: it would be better if the actual content and the "how to teach it" could be even more connected. There are several evolution courses out there with different levels of deepness but, as far as I known, is difficult to find courses on "ok, how to talk about this in class". You should include things that "how to avoid the trap of starting discussions with religious people and if you enter one of such, how to deliver the msg without going into a fight... and anti-R.Dawkings approach". Or another nice topic could be "how to counter-attack usual/frequent anti-evolution arguments in class" and so on. I mean... I would like to go beyond the content and be even more "for educators". But please, don't get me wrong, the course was awesome. | would be better if the actual | Content | and the " how to teach | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| sxMQEV4hEeSF2SIACy-E9A | Very interesting, love it. Just a constructive criticism: it would be better if the actual content and the "how to teach it" could be even more connected. There are several evolution courses out there with different levels of deepness but, as far as I known, is difficult to find courses on "ok, how to talk about this in class". You should include things that "how to avoid the trap of starting discussions with religious people and if you enter one of such, how to deliver the msg without going into a fight... and anti-R.Dawkings approach". Or another nice topic could be "how to counter-attack usual/frequent anti-evolution arguments in class" and so on. I mean... I would like to go beyond the content and be even more "for educators". But please, don't get me wrong, the course was awesome. | would like to go beyond the | Content | and be even more " for | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| sxQd3zI6EeWtEArDRuZAUQ | This course is really bad. The instruction is not enough to solve the programming assignment. The almost contents aren't related to communicating data science result. | solve the programming assignment. The almost | Content | aren't related to communicating data science | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| sxQd3zI6EeWtEArDRuZAUQ | Very good exercise to pick up PIG and AWS environment. It is best to pick up jupyter notebook prior to taking this class for the first exercise. I like how David has been able to present so much content in a 3 weeks lesson. | been able to present so much | Content | in a 3 weeks lesson. | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| sxQd3zI6EeWtEArDRuZAUQ | Much of the assignment was out of date. The content was not related to big portion of the assignment. There was no way of getting clarification over the outdated assignment content. | assignment was out of date. The | Content | was not related to big portion | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| sxQd3zI6EeWtEArDRuZAUQ | Much of the assignment was out of date. The content was not related to big portion of the assignment. There was no way of getting clarification over the outdated assignment content. | getting clarification over the outdated assignment | Content | | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| sxQd3zI6EeWtEArDRuZAUQ | Excellent content. Detractors were some of the lectures had a continual popping in the audio and the instructions for the final assignment seemed a little dated and required a bit more work to figure out the correct steps. | Excellent | Content | Detractors were some of the lectures | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| SzQW47gfEeW2iwpbOuagWQ | Good course but I hope if there are readings after each video to improve the understanding of information with more simplifying the content of ethics lesson. | of information with more simplifying the | Content | of ethics lesson. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| SzQW47gfEeW2iwpbOuagWQ | Clear, precise and very interesting content. I am working with Clinical Trials for 18 month, this helped me to learn about the bigger picture. Suggestion to Course creators: A module focussed on what is a Clinical Trial before we start with module 1 would be extremely helpful. | Clear, precise and very interesting | Content | I am working with Clinical Trials | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| t1gZRTXyEeW6RApRXdjJPw | Great content and wonderful presenters. | Great | Content | and wonderful presenters. | Positive | 0.9 | 4.0 |
| t1gZRTXyEeW6RApRXdjJPw | Some interesting content and great softwares/tools. However this second mooc is a bit too much on the commercial side (including VERY pricey softwares that few of us will ever use I guess). Fortunately, the other moocs of the specialization are much much better! | Some interesting | Content | and great softwares/tools. However this second | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| t1gZRTXyEeW6RApRXdjJPw | This Mooc Offers some great tools and tips for all social media marketers or just enthusiasts out there, great thorough content will referenced and a great experience all together | just enthusiasts out there, great thorough | Content | will referenced and a great experience | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | Decent introduction course however examples are very simple as well as the models that are constructed. I understand being an intro course the content needs to ease people into the subjects however, more realistic and real-life examples are necessary to take the material from this course and apply it. | understand being an intro course the | Content | needs to ease people into the | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | This course is somewhat lacking depth. The introduced tools are very basic and I would have expected more content for the prize | and I would have expected more | Content | for the prize | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | This course does not belong to this specialization. Poor content, poor assessment quiz, and felt quite disappointed. It is way below par. I never thought I would have to rate it this bad. If not for specialization that I am aiming for, I would never take it. Period. | not belong to this specialization. Poor | Content | poor assessment quiz, and felt quite | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | Frankly speaking, it should be the most disappointing MOOC I have ever enrolled so far. The Professor's teaching is clear and comprehensible but the depth of the course content cannot meet the university level, especially from a worldwide renowned school like Wharton. Quiz is the most terrible part which seems like nobody could get it because of the ambiguous questions and paranoid answer area. Personally, I, like many other mates, am really grateful to Coursera for offering everyone this equal opportunity. But courses with that kind of quality but staggering price will destroy the company's brand. We all want Coursera to go further and better, but few people prefer monopoly businessman rather than prestigious professors and diligent intellectuals. | but the depth of the course | Content | cannot meet the university level, especially | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | This course was very average to me. Compared to the first course in the specialization, Fundamentals of Quantitative Modeling, which was absolutely great. What I liked: Good info on the tools in excel that are needed. What I didn't like: Time spent on content that necessarily wasn't regarding models; the critical material was buried in videos and was very brief. More time should have been spent. Additionally the quiz questions were subjective at times based on what was said on video and the formula answers weren't correctly graded in many cases. This course could have been much better, maybe I was just spoiled by the first course. | I didn't like: Time spent on | Content | that necessarily wasn't regarding models; the | Negative | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| tCC8OzJzEeWLGgqjU3pHlw | It was a fun course, not sure about the educational content, but it was fun. | course, not sure about the educational | Content | but it was fun. | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| tCC8OzJzEeWLGgqjU3pHlw | Feels like a money grabber rather than teaching anything useful, when designing character for video games is also important the skill you have or obtain while doing it and this doesn't place any emphasis into it. So for the price the charge in the certificate it really feels like a money grabber rather than teaching anything useful at all. Other schools like Gnomon WorkShop and DVDs like "Eat3D" and many others out there, which gives e more content for a fraction of the price they charging here! It needs to be deeper and more robust if this course wants to stand out, right now is not. | out there, which gives e more | Content | for a fraction of the price | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| tCC8OzJzEeWLGgqjU3pHlw | The interviews were great, and useful to see a real experienced designer, however the contents in the course were almost nonexistent. The homework was well planed but it depends much more in the student to learn something that the contents exposed in the videos. Tips aren't the same as methodologies and content in character design. | a real experienced designer, however the | Content | in the course were almost nonexistent. | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| tCC8OzJzEeWLGgqjU3pHlw | The interviews were great, and useful to see a real experienced designer, however the contents in the course were almost nonexistent. The homework was well planed but it depends much more in the student to learn something that the contents exposed in the videos. Tips aren't the same as methodologies and content in character design. | student to learn something that the | Content | exposed in the videos. Tips aren't | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| tCC8OzJzEeWLGgqjU3pHlw | The interviews were great, and useful to see a real experienced designer, however the contents in the course were almost nonexistent. The homework was well planed but it depends much more in the student to learn something that the contents exposed in the videos. Tips aren't the same as methodologies and content in character design. | aren't the same as methodologies and | Content | in character design. | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| TcSA6RwWEeWBKhJRV_B8Gw | This course was very real, current and useful in my life. The content was well structured & delivered exceptionally well. I liked the fact that it was both theoretically robust and practically inclined, the examples utilised where relatable and easy to follow. I also appreciated the passion is the delivery of the course by the lecturer, her enthusiasm made watching all the videos worthwhile. Thank you for this introduction- it made a significant difference in my life | and useful in my life. The | Content | was well structured & delivered exceptionally | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| TcSA6RwWEeWBKhJRV_B8Gw | Very repetitive content, provide only some abstract presentation of the technics used. | Very repetitive | Content | provide only some abstract presentation of | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| tEqImn2kEeWb-BLhFdaGww | The reason why I gave one star is because I don't think its content is completely related to its title. This course is very similar to music production but using only pro tools. If you are looking to learn more about music production using pro tools, then this is an awesome course but if you already have some background in music production and you just want to learn pro tools basics, then I don't think this is an appropriate course (in my opinion). | is because I don't think its | Content | is completely related to its title. | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | I strongly recommend this course to those who want to learn some useful tools and techniques to become a better negotiator. Content is great, the course is nice to follow and it's not just watching some videos, you must really understand the concepts to pass the tests and it really forces you to think. | techniques to become a better negotiator. | Content | is great, the course is nice | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | I'm not done with this course, and I can already review it as EXCELLENT. The Professor is very entertaining, and the content is superb. | Professor is very entertaining, and the | Content | is superb. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | This course in really insightful and with amazing content, but the structuring of the course is a bit confusing: too many divisions, and no clear learning path | in really insightful and with amazing | Content | but the structuring of the course | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Outstanding teaching style and animations. Loved the content, format and examples. One of the most interesting and fun online classes I have taken. | teaching style and animations. Loved the | Content | format and examples. One of the | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Insightful content, great animated lectures, very valuable group work and very interesting guest lecturers. I enjoyed the course very much. | Insightful | Content | great animated lectures, very valuable group | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Absolutely loved the course! Watched every lecture. Professor Barry Nalebuff is a great teacher. His enthusiasm towards the subject matter is noteworthy. Didn't feel like a 11 hours course at all. Maybe because I played it on 1.5x ;). The course helped me understand a great deal of theory on negotiation. I compared the course content to my experience in negotiations and found the mistakes I was making. I'll try to correct those in future negotiations. I'd recommend the course to everyone! | on negotiation. I compared the course | Content | to my experience in negotiations and | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Great professor, very well explained step-by-step content and practical exercises | Great professor, very well explained step-by-step | Content | and practical exercises | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Great course! one of the best that I have ever seen in Coursera, very well driven and great content, Barry is an amazing bright teacher....would be great to get some more courses from him | Coursera, very well driven and great | Content | Barry is an amazing bright teacher. | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | The good: introduction of some deep concepts that I haven't seen yet, in a clear format. What could be better: I would have preferred the course to focus more on the technical aspects, and there were quite large sections that I thought didn't add much to the information content. Thankfully there was enough good for it to get a high rating overall. | didn't add much to the information | Content | Thankfully there was enough good for | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Excellent content with a brilliant professor | Excellent | Content | with a brilliant professor | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Great, very usefull, so many examples, very interactive, easy to work with, great content, excelent!! get into it!! | interactive, easy to work with, great | Content | excelent! ! get into it! ! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Extraordinary Course with an excited lecturing team behind it! Have done some courses here, but none of them had so much content and sophisticated teaching methods and cool guests. The only star that's missing is that the system for finding negotiation partners could be optimized. Overall, was worth the time!!! | none of them had so much | Content | and sophisticated teaching methods and cool | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Just the beginning now but a really great one ! Love the content, the teachers videos are really well made and explanatory. I found the Coursera platform really well fabricated and intuitive. Everything is set to give us the best chances to thoroughly learn and earn that awesome life changing license ! | really great one ! Love the | Content | the teachers videos are really well | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | very interesting & engaging & enriching course content . Dr.shane is wonderful in his presentation. | interesting & engaging & enriching course | Content | . Dr. shane is wonderful in | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | In a word: Great! Great content, organization, great teachers! | In a word: Great! Great | Content | organization, great teachers! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | I love this program. The content is amaizing, weel done, well prepared, concise, well explained... I love all the courses of this University!! | I love this program. The | Content | is amaizing, weel done, well prepared, | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | amazing teachers, content, smooth learning curve. Very practical and useful knowledge for the classroom teacher. | amazing teachers, | Content | smooth learning curve. Very practical and | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | This class is very easy. It is a decent introduction, but has very little content. It is clearly made to be accessible to people from all around the world, and takes the content very slowly. The test questions ask you to recite information from the video lectures and reading, rather than thinking critically. It seems like they are just trying to make sure you watched/read the content and understood it, rather than making sure you acquired the knowledge. I guess it would be hard to grade essay questions in a class this big, but the content could go a little faster. | decent introduction, but has very little | Content | It is clearly made to be | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | This class is very easy. It is a decent introduction, but has very little content. It is clearly made to be accessible to people from all around the world, and takes the content very slowly. The test questions ask you to recite information from the video lectures and reading, rather than thinking critically. It seems like they are just trying to make sure you watched/read the content and understood it, rather than making sure you acquired the knowledge. I guess it would be hard to grade essay questions in a class this big, but the content could go a little faster. | around the world, and takes the | Content | very slowly. The test questions ask | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | This class is very easy. It is a decent introduction, but has very little content. It is clearly made to be accessible to people from all around the world, and takes the content very slowly. The test questions ask you to recite information from the video lectures and reading, rather than thinking critically. It seems like they are just trying to make sure you watched/read the content and understood it, rather than making sure you acquired the knowledge. I guess it would be hard to grade essay questions in a class this big, but the content could go a little faster. | to make sure you watched/read the | Content | and understood it, rather than making | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | This class is very easy. It is a decent introduction, but has very little content. It is clearly made to be accessible to people from all around the world, and takes the content very slowly. The test questions ask you to recite information from the video lectures and reading, rather than thinking critically. It seems like they are just trying to make sure you watched/read the content and understood it, rather than making sure you acquired the knowledge. I guess it would be hard to grade essay questions in a class this big, but the content could go a little faster. | a class this big, but the | Content | could go a little faster. | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Wonderful course!! The content, the explanation etc...Thank you a lot!! | Wonderful course! ! The | Content | the explanation etc. . . Thank | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | I really enjoyed this course. The way Dr. Shane Dixon explained the subject is amazing. I learnt from him just like a child. Secondly, the course content is designed to the needs of English teachers. I would like to thank the course designers and teachers Dr. Shane Dixon, Ms.Jessica Sinco and Dr . Justin Shewell. | like a child. Secondly, the course | Content | is designed to the needs of | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Excellent course. Content, teachers, structure, everything is excellent. Highly recomend this course for expertes and new teachers. | Excellent course. | Content | teachers, structure, everything is excellent. Highly | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Content is too basic, seems unresearched. Instructor is distracting in manner in which he presents information - overemphasizes acting over content. | | Content | is too basic, seems unresearched. Instructor | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Content is too basic, seems unresearched. Instructor is distracting in manner in which he presents information - overemphasizes acting over content. | presents information - overemphasizes acting over | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | The course was very interactive and the teachers made it fun, interesting and very easy to follow. The content was also all new to me. Very helpful! | and very easy to follow. The | Content | was also all new to me. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Really Really it's an awesome course! High content, High technique . Thank you Dr: Shane It's really nice to see ya ;) | Really it's an awesome course! High | Content | High technique . Thank you Dr: | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Exceptional professors and content. Thanks a million for this initiative! | Exceptional professors and | Content | Thanks a million for this initiative! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Very helpful contents with videos of the length long enough to learn and short enough to keep learning interesting. | Very helpful | Content | with videos of the length long | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | This course gave a great baseline for getting started in TESOL. I learned as much from watching the professor model good teaching as I did from the content of the videos. I highly recommend this course if you are considering teaching English to speakers of other languages. | teaching as I did from the | Content | of the videos. I highly recommend | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Excellent teachers. Content and techniques were so easy to learn. | Excellent teachers. | Content | and techniques were so easy to | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | It was really interesting and simple to follow, and full of a rich content. It is highly recommended. | follow, and full of a rich | Content | It is highly recommended. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Although much of the content seems common sense it is probably necessary to build a common foundation here for later courses. The peer assessments are potentially interesting but, in practice, the majority are so trivial--3 or 4 sentences repeating back material from the lectures--as to be hardly worth reading. Since there is no real qualitative assessment in the peer grading, the work put in by a minority is not acknowledged nor the shortcomings of many highlighted. The instructor is unbelievably upbeat and animated which some will love and others. . . not. I tend to be in the latter camp but recognise this may be due to cultural differences or simply that I'm a boring old sod! | Although much of the | Content | seems common sense it is probably | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | I looked forward to each week's newly posted lectures and other content. This is a well-organized course, and one learns the various principles, including the more technical, without much effort. Also, Dr. Shane Dixon is a gifted teacher: his success at teaching this class proves that the teaching methods he presents yields successful learning indeed. A recommended course! | week's newly posted lectures and other | Content | This is a well-organized course, and | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | I love this course! Great videos and guided metaphors to understand the foundation principles of teaching. I had attended a traditional master course in language teaching, yet it's at ASU Tesol via Coursera I learned and understand the subject content more. | I learned and understand the subject | Content | more. | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Fantastic course with GREAT content! | Fantastic course with GREAT | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | This course was beautifully made, the content was rich and meaty and yet not overwhelming. The modules were compact and yet well paced, presented using the very same principles being taught. My children (ages 8,10, 12) would even sit down and watch Dr. Shane's lessons with me, every week! Thank you very much to the team behind the Teach English Now specialization. | This course was beautifully made, the | Content | was rich and meaty and yet | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | I am so impressed with the quality of style and content that this course was presented. I could see careful forethought, planning and execution of an online course that was a joy for me to be a part of. I totally recommend this course! | with the quality of style and | Content | that this course was presented. I | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | The content of the course is really useful and helpful and I like the way teachers present the material, thank you! :) | The | Content | of the course is really useful | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | The course is excellent! In fact, the professor, Dr. Shane Dixon is an expert able to capture and keep our attention. More yet, the content and the approach used are really good! The way Dr. Shane conduct the course and explain how to become a better teacher make this course a must for future teachers. I highly recommend, not just for english teachers, but those who wants to improve their abilities as professors at colleges and universities. | keep our attention. More yet, the | Content | and the approach used are really | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Course is fun, easy, enjoyable and beneficial. Prof. Shane is a very talented presenter and managed to pull me into the lectures. My only concerns are: The length of the course was too short and it was not very deep. In other words In my opinion they could have easily added another course worth of material to this course without it becoming overbearing. It made me feel that their stretching the number of courses you have to take to finish the specialization. Other wise its a good course. Great instructor and good content! | good course. Great instructor and good | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | This course is taught in a easy way approachable for everybody. The images, graphics, metaphors are really good to make you understand the content. | good to make you understand the | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | The content is great, but the course lacks support from the staff. It is also too easy to pass. I hope the reason for this is because the course was introductory. | The | Content | is great, but the course lacks | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Great! If this was the first I'm excited to start the others. The content is very instructive, a lot of concepts and useful tools. They should add more content per week, because is too little material to study per week. Thus, sometimes it seens to be boring. But it's ok. | excited to start the others. The | Content | is very instructive, a lot of | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Great! If this was the first I'm excited to start the others. The content is very instructive, a lot of concepts and useful tools. They should add more content per week, because is too little material to study per week. Thus, sometimes it seens to be boring. But it's ok. | useful tools. They should add more | Content | per week, because is too little | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Excellent content. Thank you. | Excellent | Content | Thank you. | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Great instructors, great teaching style, and a great content for foundational principles in language teaching! I recommend this to every language teacher who wants to hear something new! | great teaching style, and a great | Content | for foundational principles in language teaching! | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Very interesting course that provides a comprehensive, yet accessible, account of the global financial crisis as well as of its causes and consequences. Both Prof. Metrick and Mr. Geithner do a great job in explaining the materials using clear slides and easily understandable graphics and figures. The course setup is also clear and can easily be completed. The quizzes offer a good opportunity to keep track of the course contents (maybe extend them to 3-4 questions instead of just 2?). Perhaps a comprehensive final exam reviewing the materials of all prior weeks would be sensible, as one might have forgotten what topics were discussed in week 1 or 2 while learning the contents of week 11. | to keep track of the course | Content | (maybe extend them to 3-4 questions | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Very interesting course that provides a comprehensive, yet accessible, account of the global financial crisis as well as of its causes and consequences. Both Prof. Metrick and Mr. Geithner do a great job in explaining the materials using clear slides and easily understandable graphics and figures. The course setup is also clear and can easily be completed. The quizzes offer a good opportunity to keep track of the course contents (maybe extend them to 3-4 questions instead of just 2?). Perhaps a comprehensive final exam reviewing the materials of all prior weeks would be sensible, as one might have forgotten what topics were discussed in week 1 or 2 while learning the contents of week 11. | 1 or 2 while learning the | Content | of week 11. | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | The scope, content and presentation were all very well done. | The scope, | Content | and presentation were all very well | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Great course. Clear and effective even when facing rather complicated contents. Maybe I would have liked slightly longer lectures | effective even when facing rather complicated | Content | Maybe I would have liked slightly | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Sets a high bar for online educational content. The instructors clearly know their subject matter, and are serving a public duty by offering this course online. | a high bar for online educational | Content | The instructors clearly know their subject | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Interesting and topical, from people who were in the thick of things and don't pull punches. The camerawork leaves a bit to be desired, but not the content. | to be desired, but not the | Content | | Negative | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Excellent speakers with excellent organizations on course content. Could not wait for more courses from Prof Andrew. However, is there any one who could help clear the questions raised in the forum? Thank you. | speakers with excellent organizations on course | Content | Could not wait for more courses | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Short and concise videos, well-explained and easy-to-understand content. I highly recommend it! | and concise videos, well-explained and easy-to-understand | Content | I highly recommend it! | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | In short, I am somewhat disappointed with the course overall. Of course both speakers have amazing experiences and that is valuable in itself but I do believe the structure of the lectures is not envolving as it should be. It seems that the basic rationale is being 'fired' in a not so much 'educative fashion'. Still there is much to learn from these contents. | is much to learn from these | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | This course is very interesting and the content is pretty clear-cut and easy to understand. | course is very interesting and the | Content | is pretty clear-cut and easy to | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| TN2PygiBEeW4diIACwKO-g | Great, but with less new content than Units 1 and 2. | Great, but with less new | Content | than Units 1 and 2. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | Great lectures, easy to comprehend and follow! Very similar content to what I am from my university! | to comprehend and follow! Very similar | Content | to what I am from my | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | This course seems to require a high level of foundation knowledge that I don't have. I had to leave the course before completion because of that. In fact, most of the videos were too complex to understand without prior knowledge on the matter and the deadlines are quite tight to have time to research all the topics. I believe the course content is quite interesting; but too complicated. I would appreciate less text and abstract drawings on the slide, maybe an intro with images (maybe 3D) of the human body to give a little bit of background on what's going to be discussed in the class... | the topics. I believe the course | Content | is quite interesting; but too complicated. | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | One of the best free online A&P courses I have seen and been part of. The content is very well laid out and is presented in a very easy to follow manner. I would highly recommend doing this course. There is a lot of new information to learn especially if you have not done A&P before, but the excellent video lectures and written resources make it relatively easy to find answers. | seen and been part of. The | Content | is very well laid out and | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | An amazing course. The quality of the content and the information given was exceptionally detailed and cohesive. | amazing course. The quality of the | Content | and the information given was exceptionally | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | Dear course organizers and teachers, greetings! Thank you for challenging me with this course. I learned a lot and I got a wonderful overview on how our body work. Looking forward to more content or a repetition of the course. | body work. Looking forward to more | Content | or a repetition of the course. | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | This course is actually more informative than the course for human physiology i took at university. I cant stop watching the videos.Thank you for the great content. | videos. Thank you for the great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | All the content provided is very good and the tests are of a good level too. Was just sad that the course on GI system didn't say a word about the extra organ represented by our microbiome, that nothing was said about the immune system, hematopoiesis, developmental physiology and genetics, the detailed functions of the liver (nothing on the prduction of urea and the detox mechanisms), and some behavioral aspects could be interesting. | All the | Content | provided is very good and the | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | The content is quite clear the course is going good so far ; however, i recommend the lecturer be more lively to help other be more interested in the course | The | Content | is quite clear the course is | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | A bit hard in my opinion, but wonderful content and teaching so far. | hard in my opinion, but wonderful | Content | and teaching so far. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | i learn here how to learn....really fabulous ,method of teaching ...i like both teachers and their way of speaking...i like course contents i.e. they are really arranged in professional manner....thank you DUKE university and its teachers for giving me such a important platform for learning......... | speaking. . . i like course | Content | i. e. they are really arranged | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| trDN9vgGEeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | I like all of the content and this course provide me to understand the management of a project. This was my first e-learning action and i loved this. | I like all of the | Content | and this course provide me to | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| trDN9vgGEeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | I did all four courses - the whole specialization. Each course in itself was aright and I learned new things. However, the course certificate is meaningless. It neither states the content nor the effort (for example the hours). Instead, it even says "non-credit course". This is despite the fact that the course equates "35 PDU's" and "counts towards the UCI Project Management Certificate Programm"; as it was described in the FAQ. I feel betrayed. How can I apply with such a meaningless peace of paper anywhere? | is meaningless. It neither states the | Content | nor the effort (for example the | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| trDN9vgGEeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | An excellent finale for the program, giving us the oportunity to apply most of the knowledge received through the different courses. The capstone project is clear, easy to understand in terms of structure and requirements. It lacks some of the contents of the course but most of the content is included. Once again thanks to Ms Meloni, all the team from UCI and Coursera, keep the good work! | requirements. It lacks some of the | Content | of the course but most of | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| trDN9vgGEeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | An excellent finale for the program, giving us the oportunity to apply most of the knowledge received through the different courses. The capstone project is clear, easy to understand in terms of structure and requirements. It lacks some of the contents of the course but most of the content is included. Once again thanks to Ms Meloni, all the team from UCI and Coursera, keep the good work! | the course but most of the | Content | is included. Once again thanks to | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| trgWdYiKEeWfngrMqWa91Q | I would love to see this interesting lightweight introduction grow into a solid university level course with more reading, weekly added content, tests, academic discussions and a proactive moderator at the forum. | course with more reading, weekly added | Content | tests, academic discussions and a proactive | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| trgWdYiKEeWfngrMqWa91Q | A different approach to online learning. Requires concrete proof of feedback that reflects interaction and contemplation of the learner with the content given. Excellent course. | contemplation of the learner with the | Content | given. Excellent course. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Great course, a lot of content to be explored | Great course, a lot of | Content | to be explored | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Content very light, near of empty course. | | Content | very light, near of empty course. | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | the only reason to take this course is because the certification will look good on your resume. don't expect to learn anything new if you are already in IT or related field. i passed the tests without going over the material. there is a shortage of original content, although their graphics and effects department did a good job, and mostly they expect you to read outside resources. audit the course for free to get familiar with the content but only pay if you need the certification for professional reasons. | there is a shortage of original | Content | although their graphics and effects department | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | the only reason to take this course is because the certification will look good on your resume. don't expect to learn anything new if you are already in IT or related field. i passed the tests without going over the material. there is a shortage of original content, although their graphics and effects department did a good job, and mostly they expect you to read outside resources. audit the course for free to get familiar with the content but only pay if you need the certification for professional reasons. | free to get familiar with the | Content | but only pay if you need | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | The high video production values of this course fail to hide the abysmal lack of content. With approximately 4 mins per week of video charging $49 for this course is a disgrace. Potential students should save their money and read the relevant Wikipedia pages. | to hide the abysmal lack of | Content | With approximately 4 mins per week | Negative | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Poorly made very short videos that do not explain the subject matter, some of the content is outdated. | the subject matter, some of the | Content | is outdated. | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | I wish they spent more time on the content of videos and less on the silly effects and 30-second intro and outro sequences. Practically every question of the final comes word-for-word from a book not assigned in the module readings and not available for free to students for them to study. I won't be taking any other courses from this school if this course was an indication of quality. | they spent more time on the | Content | of videos and less on the | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | The course content does not follow the exam question is totally different what you learn from the two-minute video. You need to have the background in the field. This course should have gone through the beta test before release to the public. | The course | Content | does not follow the exam question | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | The best part about this course was that it made sure you are interested in learning the subject. If not, it is really really difficult to get on with it. It makes sure you understand the subject really well and you have to give back to the community. I liked the fact that you have to read the "Readings for this module" part, otherwise you won't be able to pass the Quizzes at the end of each module. You have to write a short paragraph which it will be reviewed by peers, who will in turn give you ratings. You have to do the same for other peers. This was probably the best aspect of this course. The music was extremely annoying and the quality of the content in the videos was okay, but the most important part is that it guided me in the right direction every time. Sometimes, by the end of the video, the music started in between the lecture itself and played itself for 3-4 seconds. | annoying and the quality of the | Content | in the videos was okay, but | Negative | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Video content barely summarizes the outline of each module. The questions in the quiz are not "though provoking". Peer discussion are rather superficial and do not cover half the content of the course. Readings are OK, show good sources, but there is no real discussion about them in the videos or in the quizzes. | Video | Content | barely summarizes the outline of each | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Video content barely summarizes the outline of each module. The questions in the quiz are not "though provoking". Peer discussion are rather superficial and do not cover half the content of the course. Readings are OK, show good sources, but there is no real discussion about them in the videos or in the quizzes. | and do not cover half the | Content | of the course. Readings are OK, | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Pretty average and way too short/fast paced videos. Felt like it was put together on the fly. I don't usually review but this was not great, the reading material they linked to was the best content overall. | they linked to was the best | Content | overall. | Positive | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | It's not exactly I was expecting. It covers lot of theory part. Some practical work in coding and security practicles would have added more value. I enjoyed the some material pdf suggested. However, I didn't liked "Accordingly to Microsoft" question and material. It was made 10 years back. Course content must be updated and more invovled tasks or discussions with Course makers. It looks like some videos are once made and kept as it is. I never saw actual teachers teaching something in this course, just browsing, reading and eassy writing. | was made 10 years back. Course | Content | must be updated and more invovled | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | The videos and documents are not balanced with the quizzes. The quiz questions are sometimes verbatim sentences from one book with a missing word - which I find hardly a test of acquired knowledge. The course must rise above only a few definitions and rough concepts. Most of the video's hardly offer insights - they last only 2 minutes and cover a few of those definitions. This course has a lot of potential, but in its current format and content it was a disappointment. | but in its current format and | Content | it was a disappointment. | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | The content of the videos are just some engineer citing with some brief headline of security, it's lacking of depth and explanation, totally wasting my time !! | The | Content | of the videos are just some | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | This course is missing content but it is still very interesting to work on the exercises provided. | This course is missing | Content | but it is still very interesting | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | I'm going to try to continue to the end but the first three weeks is probably 15 minutes of videos with the most annoying music available playing for way too much of the content. I also didn't need to watch 10 seconds of an animated caveman grunting and smashing things on the screen. I would probably enjoy that part more if I felt that the information that is supposed to be learned over three weeks was more information than 5 pages in a book. | for way too much of the | Content | I also didn't need to watch | Negative | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | The lectures were too heavy on Industry experts who quickly covered the important topics. I have taken many technology and business courses on Coursera with one or two professors covering the important content accented with industry and subject matter expert interviews. This format works best for consistency and learning, IMHO.. A student who is not in the Cybersecurity field will not gain insight into the meat of the material from the lectures. The final exam question material is almost exclusively absent in the lectures. One is required to read the cited material to gain the required information | or two professors covering the important | Content | accented with industry and subject matter | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Minimal video efforts, not enough content, and long readings. Definetly not a good course to get a verified certificate | Minimal video efforts, not enough | Content | and long readings. Definetly not a | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| TYSbV73jEeW1WAr3aepXuw | Although it is sometimes difficult for me to understand the people explaining the content (I am not a native English speaker), the course helped me to better understand some elements I already knew. I will recommend it to my fellow teachers. | to understand the people explaining the | Content | (I am not a native English | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | This is an excellent overview of the issues surrounding sustainable development. Some of the content needs updating, in particular with relation to the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Furthermore, some of the quiz answers are incorrect based on the data referred to and the resources appear to have been updated since the course was written. There is nobody monitoring the forum and addressing issues raised. | surrounding sustainable development. Some of the | Content | needs updating, in particular with relation | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | Exceptional content. High level text, graphs and references. Prof. Sachs is a great lecturer! So much we can learn from him and be better human beings. | Exceptional | Content | High level text, graphs and references. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | I learnt so much from this course, and really appreciated the manner in which Professor Sachs logically and systematically presented the content | Sachs logically and systematically presented the | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | Excelent Professor, with great contents! A course that should be attended by everybody. | Excelent Professor, with great | Content | A course that should be attended | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | Excellent course content but very poorly designed quizzes. More clarity is needed in formulating questions, since different pages have different values for the same data sets (even on the same website such as the World Bank indicator datasets) and it will be difficult for students to get the right answers. | Excellent course | Content | but very poorly designed quizzes. More | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | The course provides basics of Sustainable Development in a comprehensive way. Easy to understand and follow, rich with examples, and interesting content. | follow, rich with examples, and interesting | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | A course that every citizen of the world will find absolutely amazing! Excellent and well-structured content easy to understand and comprehend. | find absolutely amazing! Excellent and well-structured | Content | easy to understand and comprehend. | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | This course has been wonderfully informative. I have enjoyed the structure, content and pace of this course and always look forward to the next video. This course is essential for understanding the complex issues facing our World today. | informative. I have enjoyed the structure, | Content | and pace of this course and | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | The content is good. The delivery of lectures can be more engaging, with aid of visuals to illustrate and emphasize important concepts. | The | Content | is good. The delivery of lectures | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | Very interesting and well delivered content. Occasional links expired | Very interesting and well delivered | Content | Occasional links expired | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | This course is pretty much what i expected from an online course. I just rate it with four stars because: 1. Quiz questions are often just about interpreting world bank data and not about the contents of the course. 2. Having read Prof. Sachs book the course does not offer additional insights. | bank data and not about the | Content | of the course. 2. Having read | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | Great structure and content. Very knowledgeable lecturer as well. | Great structure and | Content | Very knowledgeable lecturer as well. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | As a novice in Photography, this course taught me the necessary basics when you are starting out to become a photographer. Videos about content and composition of the photo are extremely helpful. | to become a photographer. Videos about | Content | and composition of the photo are | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Very practical and the content was exposed in a common sense manner. Enjoyed auditing it very much! | Very practical and the | Content | was exposed in a common sense | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | The content is helpful in learning to use the camera and understand terminology, but it is somewhat, if not totally, a false representation of interaction with the experts. There is absolutely none. | The | Content | is helpful in learning to use | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | I learned a lot. This is a great introduction to photography. When I first saw the course content I thought it might be just a bunch of stuff I already knew. However, I was learning new things from the beginning. The peer reviews and feedback were a bigger influence on my experience than I expected as well. | When I first saw the course | Content | I thought it might be just | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | This course content was brilliant. It is a good course for everyone, from beginner to the well seasoned photographer.I think Mark & Peter will find a way to enlighten you in this course. | This course | Content | was brilliant. It is a good | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Very basic content, not that helpful - states what to pay attention to, but scarcely "how to". Also is very static, uses very little illustrations / animations / visuals, which is a shame for a photography course... | Very basic | Content | not that helpful - states what | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | The content of the course is good and I feel it would be beneficial for beginners or those who want to top up their technical / academic knowledge on the subject. I found the terrible editing of the lectures distracting though, and it felt like no one bothered to over-see the final version that was published. I also don't think the fact that one has to pay so much to access the assessments, which many other courses don't do at all, is conducive to creating a strong engagement in the course. I wouldn't for example be encouraged to take another course from this series (not sure if one is offered). | The | Content | of the course is good and | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Informative, numerous examples, great for beginners. Locked content is the downside. | numerous examples, great for beginners. Locked | Content | is the downside. | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Course contents are not very well organized. | Course | Content | are not very well organized. | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Love the peer review process! The professors are incredibly knowledgeable, the assignments inspire creativity, and the content is relevant and timely. | the assignments inspire creativity, and the | Content | is relevant and timely. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | There were some technical challenges that made this course not as fun. The content was good. If you make the assignments easier to submit (for example: provide a box to write a statement as opposed to uploading one) it will remove frustration and increase enjoyment. | this course not as fun. The | Content | was good. If you make the | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | The content, although very basic, is interesting, and some of the teacher's insights do stimulate discussion, but the video quality is low, with non matching slides, etc. | The | Content | although very basic, is interesting, and | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| u3goXsk9EeWT3Aqsn0BGnQ | This course is really well prepared. The material is very clear and good resources are provided for further learning. The quizzes and labs are always relevant to the course content. | are always relevant to the course | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| u3goXsk9EeWT3Aqsn0BGnQ | The professor is one of the best instructers I've seen. I've struggled to understand these concepts before but this course just set everything straight. Lots of content to practice with too. | just set everything straight. Lots of | Content | to practice with too. | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| u3goXsk9EeWT3Aqsn0BGnQ | The course content is very comprehensive and all the concepts have been explained clearly. This course has helped me a lot in building my statistics skill. I would recommend this course to anybody who is looking to learn inferntial Statistics. | The course | Content | is very comprehensive and all the | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Amazing Content for newbies , I do recommend these for business leaders as well. | Amazing | Content | for newbies , I do recommend | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good and to the point content. Very informative | Very good and to the point | Content | Very informative | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Had fun with this course. Precise, concise & the content is cutting edge & juicy! | this course. Precise, concise & the | Content | is cutting edge & juicy! | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | I feel that I wasted my time and money on this course to be very honest. Should have requested a refund when I could. The professor really doesn't put in the effort like other professors on Coursera. He is literally reading out the content on each slide. The content isn't very enlightening either, it's just facts about mobile technology and their release dates. One can read that up on wikipedia I honestly think this course should be taken off this platform so no one else falls for it as I did. If you're reading this before you enroll, don't do it, don't waste your time and money on this. | He is literally reading out the | Content | on each slide. The content isn't | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | I feel that I wasted my time and money on this course to be very honest. Should have requested a refund when I could. The professor really doesn't put in the effort like other professors on Coursera. He is literally reading out the content on each slide. The content isn't very enlightening either, it's just facts about mobile technology and their release dates. One can read that up on wikipedia I honestly think this course should be taken off this platform so no one else falls for it as I did. If you're reading this before you enroll, don't do it, don't waste your time and money on this. | the content on each slide. The | Content | isn't very enlightening either, it's just | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good content and presentation, Thank you | Very good | Content | and presentation, Thank you | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Information in this course is thorough and comprehensive. The material is entirely composed of the specifications, release and feature development, and comparison of Android OS and iOS. The instructor shows slides and reads the slides in their entirety. There is no additional information the instructor provides that is not already included in the slide content. The teaching is not very stimulating. But the instructor does cover the material completely. | not already included in the slide | Content | The teaching is not very stimulating. | Negative | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| ucx-Hq4vEeSjoiIAC7JR4w | So far, I'm really enjoying this course. I like the look of it, the professor is engaging and as a layperson I find the content very, very interesting. What a wonderful take on plant biology! | as a layperson I find the | Content | very, very interesting. What a wonderful | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| ucx-Hq4vEeSjoiIAC7JR4w | Excellent delivery of content and enjoyed the course very much !! | Excellent delivery of | Content | and enjoyed the course very much | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| uGmLdI_nEeW93wo8Ha4kow | Thanks to the course, learned a few tips on online searching. Some contents could be consolidated to shorten session times. Overall, appreciated Coursera's knowledge sharing. | few tips on online searching. Some | Content | could be consolidated to shorten session | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| UHpTmhtHEeWBKhJRV_B8Gw | Thank you, Sir! Another fantastic course content. | Thank you, Sir! Another fantastic course | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| uiT8U5oIEeWQGBKrxISOrQ | The course content is very solid. It focuses heavily on the tools and technique, and there lacks the concepts and biology behind those tools. But I would guess there is some prior courses in this specialization explaining the concepts, though I didn't take them. The tools explained in this course is the most popular ones for handling up-stream analysis. They are the must-have ones for current bioinformatician jobs. The instructor, Dr Liliana Florea, did a great job, walking you through those tools step-by-step. I also found the exercises (exams) highly useful. The course title is not the most accurate one. The title is not very catchy either. This course is more about the tools for analyzing next generation sequence data. | The course | Content | is very solid. It focuses heavily | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| ujxZm0T9EeWhnQozdayc-w | I slogged through it and got an 89, but the videos were boring and the quizzes were poorly worded and should have had greater correlation with the course content. | had greater correlation with the course | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| ujxZm0T9EeWhnQozdayc-w | I felt more like I was part of some experiment to see how long I could tolerate boredom than that I was in class where someone was trying to share knowledge with me. Needless to say I did not make it to the end which is sad because I was genuinely interested in the content. The instructor's delivery was absolutely monotone and he did not seem to emphasize the key points in any way so I found it very difficult to retain any information or to even stay awake at times. | I was genuinely interested in the | Content | The instructor's delivery was absolutely monotone | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| ujxZm0T9EeWhnQozdayc-w | The content was interesting, but the quizzes didn't relate to the lectures very often. It was as if there was a major piece missing in this course. One of the questions even referenced a book that was never mentioned or made available. Also, several of the musical sections seemed to be in the wrong place. I think maybe this is one of the classes that doesn't work well in this format. | The | Content | was interesting, but the quizzes didn't | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| ujxZm0T9EeWhnQozdayc-w | Good video content, but quizzes need to be revised. | Good video | Content | but quizzes need to be revised. | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| ujxZm0T9EeWhnQozdayc-w | The content is great. But there's not a lot of activity on the discussion boards, and there are some technical issues with the quizzes (using future lesson material on current quizzes). But the content is really fascinating. | The | Content | is great. But there's not a | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| ujxZm0T9EeWhnQozdayc-w | The content is great. But there's not a lot of activity on the discussion boards, and there are some technical issues with the quizzes (using future lesson material on current quizzes). But the content is really fascinating. | material on current quizzes). But the | Content | is really fascinating. | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| Uq0cvh6TEeS2uyIACzGOcw | Excellent course if you are interested in health, diet, cuisine and wellbeing. Teachers have solid knowledge and explain contents clearly. Taking this course has been very interesting and enjoyable! | Teachers have solid knowledge and explain | Content | clearly. Taking this course has been | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Uq0cvh6TEeS2uyIACzGOcw | Good course organization and enlightening information. The videos are well peaced and the overall lectures quite clear and full of content. I just wish you could present further reading and complementary material. | lectures quite clear and full of | Content | I just wish you could present | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | The course content is good, although it is very "USA centered". It is very good for people with small experience in the professional market, no just the games area, but all areas. Casey is a great teacher, he makes boring stuff be less boring. The only negative point of the course are the assignments. Again, like in the previous course, the assignments are too subjective, too personal, hard to do and evaluate. Unlike last course (Game Design), I really recommend this one, useful stuff. | The course | Content | is good, although it is very | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Awesome course! But I think It was a very short course. I wish it had more content. Very expensive course for this amount of content...still I really like it =). | course. I wish it had more | Content | Very expensive course for this amount | Negative | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Awesome course! But I think It was a very short course. I wish it had more content. Very expensive course for this amount of content...still I really like it =). | expensive course for this amount of | Content | . . still I really like | Negative | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Great content and great teacher. But I found the assignments and the quizzes not that great. I reckon the questions and corrections were a bit subjective and time consuming. | Great | Content | and great teacher. But I found | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | The Good > A lot of content > Provided a lot of outside reading material > Passionate professor > A lot of good refreshers (about CVs, teamwork, business practices) Suggestions > I hope in the future more time could be spent on monetization theories and practices > More emphasis on mobile games (as much as I dislike them) > Maybe some type of "case study" examples about games from conceptualization to publishing | The Good > A lot of | Content | > Provided a lot of outside | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | During the first week the assignments for the week was not even remotely associated with the content we learn throughout the week. For individuals who wish to learn about the video game industry but are not avid video game players or well read in its trade magazines, this is a bit frustrating. This slightly improved in following weeks. Besides that, the course is stellar. | not even remotely associated with the | Content | we learn throughout the week. For | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | This course is good for someone that's interested in starting up a company - for video game development or really any kind of self-employed, consulting, freelance or even small business company. I've been self-employed for 15+ years and can honestly say I didn't learn anything that I hadn't already known. But my experiences in entrepreneurship and this course both are similar in content, meaning the class is a good resource for those who don't know where to start. | this course both are similar in | Content | meaning the class is a good | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Many of the issues from the previous course have been fixed in this course. Not bad, but there were still issues with the video content not matching up well with the assignments. Especially in that the assignments are never talked about in the videos, especially how to create the papers that are asked of the student. | were still issues with the video | Content | not matching up well with the | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Better than the second one. It should focus more on the specifics of the game industry. It provides much generalist advice that can be gotten in much better depth in other entrepreneurship content on Coursera I missed a section on what are the main players on the gaming industry and a brief discussion of each | much better depth in other entrepreneurship | Content | on Coursera I missed a section | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| URpKtPs6EeSnBSIACi-PoQ | Great content and presentation | Great | Content | and presentation | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| URpKtPs6EeSnBSIACi-PoQ | Content is good and teaching material is of good quality. Some more examples of the application of the concepts discussed during the lectures could make this course even more interesting. | | Content | is good and teaching material is | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| URpKtPs6EeSnBSIACi-PoQ | Good Content, and a lot of knowledge its highly recommended to read the opportunity analysis canvas book before watching the videos. the Audio in many Videos is mono not stereo | Good | Content | and a lot of knowledge its | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| URpKtPs6EeSnBSIACi-PoQ | Amazing course, real life experience content | Amazing course, real life experience | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| URpKtPs6EeSnBSIACi-PoQ | It is a course with lots of information but the delivery is a little weak. It is a presentation with an instructor in the corner but he or she mostly just reads the presentation aloud. There needs to be much more interaction, much more animation and passion, and the use of "real" people in a "real" environment. I can tell you that my mind wondered constantly because of the lack of passion and interest in the subject being conveyed by the presenter as well as the monotonous delivery. Again, the content is valuable and solid, but that in and of itself does not make for a good course. | as the monotonous delivery. Again, the | Content | is valuable and solid, but that | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| usIwBhODEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Excellent content | Excellent | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| usIwBhODEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | The contents of the course are great and prof. Impey is a great communicator. The course is easy to follow, the final chapters on galaxies and cosmology are a bit more difficult but that is due to the nature of the subject and I applaud that the prof does not "dumb it down" or brushes over such difficult ans speculative subjects. I minor nuisance for me were the frequent songs and funny videos interspersed in the course content. It would have been better if they were separate from the main videos or otherwise could be easily skipped by people who don't have a lot of time. overall a great course! | The | Content | of the course are great and | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| usIwBhODEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | The contents of the course are great and prof. Impey is a great communicator. The course is easy to follow, the final chapters on galaxies and cosmology are a bit more difficult but that is due to the nature of the subject and I applaud that the prof does not "dumb it down" or brushes over such difficult ans speculative subjects. I minor nuisance for me were the frequent songs and funny videos interspersed in the course content. It would have been better if they were separate from the main videos or otherwise could be easily skipped by people who don't have a lot of time. overall a great course! | funny videos interspersed in the course | Content | It would have been better if | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| UTmoThr5EeWqIgq-TOy4Xw | The contents seem to start in a more informative than scientific way, but then it is a great course as the weeks go by! | The | Content | seem to start in a more | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| UwQkL5z8EeWJORITtzkPnQ | An excellent course with very informative content! | An excellent course with very informative | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| UwQkL5z8EeWJORITtzkPnQ | Excellent course. Larry is a great teacher and the quizzes and assignments give a great opportunity to consolidate our learning. One recommendation I would give is to try to make the forum more useful maybe by including TAs o including mentors that response on the course contents and not only on technical issu | mentors that response on the course | Content | and not only on technical issu | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| UYzGkJfFEeWqkw5zNB248Q | Great course that explains a lot of core concepts and techniques (like controlling depth of field). Also gives a great introduction to the different types of lenses available. My only criticism would be that the last two weeks are lighter on content (however the assignments are challenging and a lot of fun!) | last two weeks are lighter on | Content | (however the assignments are challenging and | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| UYzGkJfFEeWqkw5zNB248Q | The content is helpful in learning to use the camera and understand terminology, but it is somewhat, if not totally, a false representation of interaction with the experts. There is absolutely none. Some seems repetitive from course one. | The | Content | is helpful in learning to use | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| UYzGkJfFEeWqkw5zNB248Q | Peter & Mark hit a home run with this course, very thorough , great advice,this was a course full of knowledge and at the same time I truly enjoyed their way of delivering the content. | enjoyed their way of delivering the | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| UYzGkJfFEeWqkw5zNB248Q | Sorry but yet again a potentially great course spoiled by the implementation, way too many mistakes in the quizzes, peer review grading systems which in places are nonsense . I hope things get better and I give the the course the 5 stars the content would merit if it had been properly QCed and delivered to best Coursera standards | the course the 5 stars the | Content | would merit if it had been | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| UYzGkJfFEeWqkw5zNB248Q | Great content but some very choppy editing which spoils the flow. I'd much rather have longer lessons and less aggressive editing | Great | Content | but some very choppy editing which | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| UYzGkJfFEeWqkw5zNB248Q | The course started really well and followed on nicely from the first course in the series but I'm really disappointed and frustrated with the video editing issues. Many were fixed but there are still some errors/omissions and the second half of the course was very short of content compared to the rest. Such a shame as I'm sure the writers really know their material and conveyed so well when the content was there. I'm looking forward to the next course and hope the material is all ready to go! | the course was very short of | Content | compared to the rest. Such a | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| UYzGkJfFEeWqkw5zNB248Q | The course started really well and followed on nicely from the first course in the series but I'm really disappointed and frustrated with the video editing issues. Many were fixed but there are still some errors/omissions and the second half of the course was very short of content compared to the rest. Such a shame as I'm sure the writers really know their material and conveyed so well when the content was there. I'm looking forward to the next course and hope the material is all ready to go! | and conveyed so well when the | Content | was there. I'm looking forward to | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| UYzGkJfFEeWqkw5zNB248Q | The only content I had access to were lectures, but I still want to say that I really liked this course. And I'm looking forward to another courses of this specialization. I'm a music student with bachelor's degree in Computer Science and dozens of coursera certificates (from the times they were free), I'm curious about everything. I used to say that I'll learn to paint when I retire :) But it turned out that I can do pretty good photos without having to wait until retirement. It's not the same thing, of course, but it's a visual art. This course and "Cameras, Exposure, and Photography" teached me a lot and brought so much joy into my life. I'm not planning to make money as a photographer, but I'm happy to have an opportunity to create better and better photographs. Thank you, Prof. Glendinning and Prof. Sullivan. And thanks to everyone who helped to create this course. My photos can be found here, in case you're curious: https://www.flickr.com/photos/140271759@N03/ Most of them are made with my old cheap digital camera, only a few with a new DSLR. I would never have the courage and motivation to buy it without your courses. Thanks again for all the happiness photography brings into my life :) | The only | Content | I had access to were lectures, | Negative | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Great course! Lays solid foundation for approaching Marketing Analytics. Those already into it might find the content elementary but it is very useful. Looking forward to completing the specialization! | already into it might find the | Content | elementary but it is very useful. | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | The content could have digged deeper a bit more and the assignments could have been harder. | The | Content | could have digged deeper a bit | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Really great content and learnings. | Really great | Content | and learnings. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | I felt like this course was too repetitive. Basically, all I learned were from readings and textbooks. Video lectures were repeats from those contents. I did learn useful tools for web analytics, but I wish the instructor put some of his original insights rather than presenting articles written from other people. | Video lectures were repeats from those | Content | I did learn useful tools for | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Great content, nice presentation but Coursera website is slow, especially the submission step is unstable. | Great | Content | nice presentation but Coursera website is | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | This is a very basic course. The contents do not cover a whole lot of ground. I personally did feel that there is a lot of repetition and this course did not help much . I somehow feel this course and the next ( the practical one ) could have been combined into one. Otherwise, not worth 2 courses of money. | is a very basic course. The | Content | do not cover a whole lot | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | This stage of the course i feel could be summed up to just one week worth of work. It mainly revolves around ZMOT and best marketing analytics and data collection techniques and rawly around 30 minutes of content, and the last week was more of a "let's sum up". Compared to the first stage where every single week had a new subject, with lots of content this one i feel, just didn't cut it. I do feel I learned a lot from it...and i plan to finish the specialization, but this one should be aided as part of another another module. | and rawly around 30 minutes of | Content | and the last week was more | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | This stage of the course i feel could be summed up to just one week worth of work. It mainly revolves around ZMOT and best marketing analytics and data collection techniques and rawly around 30 minutes of content, and the last week was more of a "let's sum up". Compared to the first stage where every single week had a new subject, with lots of content this one i feel, just didn't cut it. I do feel I learned a lot from it...and i plan to finish the specialization, but this one should be aided as part of another another module. | a new subject, with lots of | Content | this one i feel, just didn't | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Great content. I would have preferred it if we had gone through a real example. None the less, it was a great course I definitely found the consumer decision journey model and the ZMOT very insightful. | Great | Content | I would have preferred it if | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Some contents are overlapped, especially Lesson 7 feels like a recap of all previous lessons. Tool list is really helpful. Other examples could be written in more details. The narrative is easy to follow, reasonable pace of speech | Some | Content | are overlapped, especially Lesson 7 feels | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | very cool stuff, although the content could be a bit more compressed for this course and the next, I have the feeling that there are many redundancies and stuff that comes more than once | very cool stuff, although the | Content | could be a bit more compressed | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Excellent course with concise and well articulated content. | course with concise and well articulated | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | thank you for the great structured content only recommendation is to increase the audio volume of the lecturer | thank you for the great structured | Content | only recommendation is to increase the | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Excellent content, narration could have been clearer and felt there was a bit of an overload of information in the lectures - could have been broken down into chunks. | Excellent | Content | narration could have been clearer and | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Hated the course and the content. I truly regret investing my money on this course. | Hated the course and the | Content | I truly regret investing my money | Negative | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | The lecture presents Google's ZMOT marketing model, how it benefited (and shaped) marketing research and strategies to increase conversion and loyalty. It is a good contextual introduction if you never heard of "search engine marketing", "cost per acquisition" or "click through rate". If you know the basics, it is probably not a good use of your time. I didn't like that the content feels like evangelism for (paid) google services, and most sources of the course are either random blogs or related to interested parties (google, twitter). I still learnt a couple of cool metrics I didn't know about, but the course didn't bring any added value to the blog links provided. | time. I didn't like that the | Content | feels like evangelism for (paid) google | Negative | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Excellent crafted content for Marketing Analytics | Excellent crafted | Content | for Marketing Analytics | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | The content is very similar to the Marketing analytics in practice one | The | Content | is very similar to the Marketing | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Interesting content and very well designed course. Instructor is good at explaining concepts. | Interesting | Content | and very well designed course. Instructor | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | This course delivered a lot of good, practical information on how to work with digital analytics to improve customer content, engage with customers and potential customers, and use quantifiable data for decision making. Take it to improve your understanding of digital analytics. | with digital analytics to improve customer | Content | engage with customers and potential customers, | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Great content! | Great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Really good course. Mr Hartman is an excellent instructor, the lectures are well presented and lecture notes are easy to follow. Together with the required reading the course content feels really "complete". Highly recommended. | with the required reading the course | Content | feels really " complete" . Highly | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | we are expecting some more similar good content mooc courses from michigan state university, regarding digital marketing , inbound marketing, internet of things,etc | are expecting some more similar good | Content | mooc courses from michigan state university, | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Simple but not easy. This is well presented course with very practical content. I was able to put it to work straight away. I now approach negotiations with much more structure (and confidence). Looking forward to making the larger for everyone! | well presented course with very practical | Content | I was able to put it | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | The lectures were amazing, with lots of content but easy to follow. The examples were great to make everything clear. | lectures were amazing, with lots of | Content | but easy to follow. The examples | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | love the professor and content | love the professor and | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Currently enrolled. Seems very well structured and - so far - is full of high-quality useful content! | - is full of high-quality useful | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Excellent teacher and great content, perfectly fit for a self-study course, it would be even better if there were more exercises to practice. | Excellent teacher and great | Content | perfectly fit for a self-study course, | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Excellent approach and content. | Excellent approach and | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Excellent content, structure and delivery. Thank you for this course!! Very useful. | Excellent | Content | structure and delivery. Thank you for | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Great book and great content on the course. | Great book and great | Content | on the course. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Poor content, only a book accompanies the videos and we should not be forced to buy anything! | Poor | Content | only a book accompanies the videos | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | The professor is clear in explaining and makes you feel part of the lectures. You learn the content and you learn how to really use what is explained. Amazing opportunity. | of the lectures. You learn the | Content | and you learn how to really | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Great content, Professor's really good. Thanks! | Great | Content | Professor's really good. Thanks! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | This course is challenging, but if you stick with the deadlines and take the exam within the timeline you will learn the content deeply. There is a lot of usable information in this course whether it is for personal or professional use. | the timeline you will learn the | Content | deeply. There is a lot of | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Great content! | Great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Excellent course! I recommend this course for everyone interested in negotiation whether you're an amateur (just like me) or a professional. The course content is clear and the lectures are easy to follow. Professor, you explained everything very neatly and clearly. It was a very valuable experience to me, and I found myself learning more than I thought I would. It's definitely worth trying! Thank you professor Siedel for your wonderful work. Best regards, Patrycja E. Stala | me) or a professional. The course | Content | is clear and the lectures are | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | This course was really useful and Prof. Siedel is such a great person. It is a pleasure listen to his lectures that were more like stories. I however would have liked to have little quizzes in between the weeks to review the content. It adds up quite a lot and even taking notes, at the end some info gets missing. I definitely recommend this course though. I am sure I will do much better in my next negotiation. | between the weeks to review the | Content | It adds up quite a lot | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Some great content in this course - very comprehensive and great for anyone new to negotiation or just wanting a refresher. | Some great | Content | in this course - very comprehensive | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | The contents are so relevant to the real world. I am glad that I have the opportunity to learn these skills and collect the techniques to use for the future. I always think that that the skillful negotiator will have to lie and being a bad person, but this course change my thought. I used to scare of negotiation, but now I am up for it. Thank you very much for the fantastic class. I don't know how you craft this course, but it kept my interest up till the end (which rarely happens). | The | Content | are so relevant to the real | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | excellent course. very experienced and knowledgeable professor. content of practical use and relevant almost every interaction where influencing is required. | course. very experienced and knowledgeable professor. | Content | of practical use and relevant almost | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Outstanding content for any profession or walk of life. I wish I would have had this course about 10 years ago! | Outstanding | Content | for any profession or walk of | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very good course, structure, content, and engaging fellow students -- big Thanks UofM! :)) | Very good course, structure, | Content | and engaging fellow students -- big | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Thank you so much for provding quality content. This is the best thing in coursera. Keep it up. | you so much for provding quality | Content | This is the best thing in | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | The course content was good. | The course | Content | was good. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Great teacher, wonderfull content and examples. Thank you very much professor Siedel Only one improving point: the videos were often working badly (no audio or breaking the upload) | Great teacher, wonderfull | Content | and examples. Thank you very much | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | I love the program content as well as lecturer's knowledge about this topic. So many interesting examples he provided during the course make it really practical and attracting to learners. Many thanks! | I love the program | Content | as well as lecturer's knowledge about | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Excellent content. I felt elevated in this area and can enter any negotiation with confidence. I loved the Professor, he kept it interesting an I always had to keep my paper an pen close to answer his quick questions. EXCELLENT!!!!! | Excellent | Content | I felt elevated in this area | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | He is certainly a very good teacher, but he is boring. He uses this same monotonous tone,but seeing the content it does help us understand. | same monotonous tone, but seeing the | Content | it does help us understand. | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Great contents, fantastic teacher. I advise you to buy the book, I really enjoyed reading it. This is my first course on Coursera platform, I prefer EdX but that's an opinion. I would like an additional course taught by the same teacher, with more advanced contents. | Great | Content | fantastic teacher. I advise you to | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Great contents, fantastic teacher. I advise you to buy the book, I really enjoyed reading it. This is my first course on Coursera platform, I prefer EdX but that's an opinion. I would like an additional course taught by the same teacher, with more advanced contents. | the same teacher, with more advanced | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Excellent content | Excellent | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Only few starting videos give new information and techniques, the rest 80% is quite useless. Course would be much better if it gives real tips and techniques rather than constant repetitions of the same information in different forms. If you read the course contents - you already get 75% of what is presented in the videos. | forms. If you read the course | Content | - you already get 75% of | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | World class teacher. Fine contents with a very useful legal approach that is often missed in introductory negotiation courses. Compared to other Coursera MOOCs I missed support materials or further readings. Additional assignments and cases could be included. | World class teacher. Fine | Content | with a very useful legal approach | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| V5SinKHsEeSqoSIACzsKQg | I thought the course was intended for health professionals and others with interest in medicine but both form and content were not particularly informative nor well prepared. The lengthy interviews were interrupted every third word, rather peculiar style of the lecturer and scant amount of information were all a bit of a disappointment. The entire course could be probably condensed and deivered over 2-3 hours. On the more positive note I thought some slides were interesting. I intend to complete as I paidfor the cert but find it hard to recommend this course to anyone, sorry. | in medicine but both form and | Content | were not particularly informative nor well | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| V5SinKHsEeSqoSIACzsKQg | The professor is amazing and the content was up to date and really engaging! | The professor is amazing and the | Content | was up to date and really | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | This is the worst course online I've done so far. I would not recommend it to anyone as it stands, regardless of the student's background, this course is just poor and lacking. The premise of this course is a promising one, the topic is still in its infancy and seems very interesting. Having said that, this is about everything positive that I can say about this course. For starters, the videos seem good at first, but later it becomes very superficial and monotone. The content is many times just rushed through and it's visible that the lecturers at several occasions have difficulty even to read their own slides! However, the worst part of the course are the quizzes. There are 24 graded quizzes in total, to pass the course you need to pass all 24 of them! To make matters worse, the minimum passing marks for each quiz is 80%, that wouldn't have been such an issue if most quizzes had 5 or more questions, which is not the case, most of the quizzes have 4 or less questions. This is such an unreasonable requirement, if you miss only one question in a quiz with 3 questions there's already no chance to pass the course! The content of each quiz is also very troublesome, we are essentially being graded for trivia, a considerable number of the questions are very superficially related to not related at all to the subject of each lecture. Instead of using the questions to delve deeper into the topic at hand, they only create confusion with futilities. A little example, the topic of a subject was about the mechanical properties of using multiple templates and a question in its quiz was about an electric circuit that is never shown in the question itself, only briefly shown in the lecture video for about 10s, minimal information is given without any explanation of what they mean and we are asked to enter a formula as the answer for which also almost no information is given about which notation we should use for the formula itself. There are other cases where there are multiple choice questions which have incorrect answers accepted by the grader. In one instance, two of the options available are contradictory to each other, however the accepted answer was the one involving both. In another instance, there was more than one solution available to an answer, however the grader accepted only one and there was no information in the question itself to narrow down the possible answers to the desired one. Finally, there is no active community by the TA and professors, I have never had a single answer form a TA or professor, only sporadical replies from a mentor, who has no authority to fix any issue by him or herself. All these issues just point to how poorly this course was designed. It had such high hopes, but they fell short flat. In doing this course, I found myself reverse engineering most of the questions just to try to find an accepted answer and try to understand what it meant. The imposed 8-hour period between attempts at the quizzes only hindered my progress. I was focused and engaged in studying for each quiz, however, after 3 failed attempts I had an imposed break period that makes little sense. In the end, this course only made me feel like the very object of my learning: a robot. I am really disappointed with this course. | becomes very superficial and monotone. The | Content | is many times just rushed through | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | This is the worst course online I've done so far. I would not recommend it to anyone as it stands, regardless of the student's background, this course is just poor and lacking. The premise of this course is a promising one, the topic is still in its infancy and seems very interesting. Having said that, this is about everything positive that I can say about this course. For starters, the videos seem good at first, but later it becomes very superficial and monotone. The content is many times just rushed through and it's visible that the lecturers at several occasions have difficulty even to read their own slides! However, the worst part of the course are the quizzes. There are 24 graded quizzes in total, to pass the course you need to pass all 24 of them! To make matters worse, the minimum passing marks for each quiz is 80%, that wouldn't have been such an issue if most quizzes had 5 or more questions, which is not the case, most of the quizzes have 4 or less questions. This is such an unreasonable requirement, if you miss only one question in a quiz with 3 questions there's already no chance to pass the course! The content of each quiz is also very troublesome, we are essentially being graded for trivia, a considerable number of the questions are very superficially related to not related at all to the subject of each lecture. Instead of using the questions to delve deeper into the topic at hand, they only create confusion with futilities. A little example, the topic of a subject was about the mechanical properties of using multiple templates and a question in its quiz was about an electric circuit that is never shown in the question itself, only briefly shown in the lecture video for about 10s, minimal information is given without any explanation of what they mean and we are asked to enter a formula as the answer for which also almost no information is given about which notation we should use for the formula itself. There are other cases where there are multiple choice questions which have incorrect answers accepted by the grader. In one instance, two of the options available are contradictory to each other, however the accepted answer was the one involving both. In another instance, there was more than one solution available to an answer, however the grader accepted only one and there was no information in the question itself to narrow down the possible answers to the desired one. Finally, there is no active community by the TA and professors, I have never had a single answer form a TA or professor, only sporadical replies from a mentor, who has no authority to fix any issue by him or herself. All these issues just point to how poorly this course was designed. It had such high hopes, but they fell short flat. In doing this course, I found myself reverse engineering most of the questions just to try to find an accepted answer and try to understand what it meant. The imposed 8-hour period between attempts at the quizzes only hindered my progress. I was focused and engaged in studying for each quiz, however, after 3 failed attempts I had an imposed break period that makes little sense. In the end, this course only made me feel like the very object of my learning: a robot. I am really disappointed with this course. | chance to pass the course! The | Content | of each quiz is also very | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | There must be something wrong to spend time on google&wiki much more than the course content. | google&wiki much more than the course | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | I will never walk the same. This course has some of the coolest content in robotics and the instructor is great! | course has some of the coolest | Content | in robotics and the instructor is | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | Despite the arguments of this module are extremely interesting and very useful for Robotics, I think the way they are treated is very poor. In my opinion lectures are so superficial that it is almost a waste of time to follow them. Lectures are completely useless and most of the time quizzes are note related with them. In order to solve quizzes you have not only to recover prior knowledge, that it is obvious, but also to search for new arguments somwhere in the web, in some other courses where contents are better treated and explained. In that contest what are the quizzes, what should quizzes have to test if no content is given? Moreover it often happen that without a clear support from the lectures, questions are confused and ambiguous. It is quite difficult to follow the teaching path and to enrich my knowledge. I think it is a very bad way to make a course and often the pleasure to follow disappears leaving a sense of frustration and futility. I arrived at the end of the course just because I'm doing the specialization otherwise I would have left in the middle of the first week. I'm very disappointed. | web, in some other courses where | Content | are better treated and explained. In | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | Despite the arguments of this module are extremely interesting and very useful for Robotics, I think the way they are treated is very poor. In my opinion lectures are so superficial that it is almost a waste of time to follow them. Lectures are completely useless and most of the time quizzes are note related with them. In order to solve quizzes you have not only to recover prior knowledge, that it is obvious, but also to search for new arguments somwhere in the web, in some other courses where contents are better treated and explained. In that contest what are the quizzes, what should quizzes have to test if no content is given? Moreover it often happen that without a clear support from the lectures, questions are confused and ambiguous. It is quite difficult to follow the teaching path and to enrich my knowledge. I think it is a very bad way to make a course and often the pleasure to follow disappears leaving a sense of frustration and futility. I arrived at the end of the course just because I'm doing the specialization otherwise I would have left in the middle of the first week. I'm very disappointed. | quizzes have to test if no | Content | is given? Moreover it often happen | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | Good teachers but a lot of questions in the quizzes were very ambiguous and unrelated to the Course Content. | ambiguous and unrelated to the Course | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | Poorly structured. Bloated. Discontinuous content. | Poorly structured. Bloated. Discontinuous | Content | | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | Interesting to learn about how and why robots differ from animals. The material was relatively easy to digest because the lectures were well paced and at the end there was a summary of the content. The quizzes are intelligent, so the course is not a give away. | there was a summary of the | Content | The quizzes are intelligent, so the | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | Nice high level overview of the motion of robots. I would have liked to do more programming (modeling of robots, controllers, etc.) in the course and have the lectures tie in closer with the content of the quizzes. The TAs were very active in the forums and helped clarify/fix any problems that came up. | lectures tie in closer with the | Content | of the quizzes. The TAs were | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | This course gave me a new understanding of modern art, and also about the artists and the works selected for the course. The content has been carefully selected and the reading material is very interesting. | works selected for the course. The | Content | has been carefully selected and the | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | This was a thought provoking, tip of the ice-berg, inspiring and simple course appropriate for nearly anyone with an interest in 'the arts'. I will say also that crucial to 'getting' this topic and the most out of the course content you must do the final project. That is where the aha! moment awaits. Great course. | the most out of the course | Content | you must do the final project. | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | repetitive content with other MOMA courses (seeing thru pictures)?? duh, not gonna pay $50 for this. :( | repetitive | Content | with other MOMA courses (seeing thru | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | I have no complaints over the content. I would however, change the final quizzes, which rely too much on one essay rather than on the videos or on other reading material. | I have no complaints over the | Content | I would however, change the final | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | This course is solely for teachers, on how to tech art to elementary school pupils. Very basic. Most of the content is available on the MoMA's website. Disappointing. | pupils. Very basic. Most of the | Content | is available on the MoMA's website. | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good video production, successful combination of video content and reading resources as well as very interesting weekly topics. | video production, successful combination of video | Content | and reading resources as well as | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | Excellent concepts and content. Poor quiz composition and monitoring by MOMA staff of discussion. Logistical hassles tainted joy from the delivery. | Excellent concepts and | Content | Poor quiz composition and monitoring by | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | Excellent content, but absent support platform. | Excellent | Content | but absent support platform. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| V9_aHBU7EeWfzgpfp_iBVw | This is an exceptional course. The quality of the lectures – course content, lecturing approach, and audiovisual production – is top-notch. Randy Picker provides a fascinating, engaging look at various devices and platforms, starting with their history and then integrating legal considerations, particularly under antitrust and copyright law. He presents the material in an easily comprehensible and digestible way, and explores subjects (and objects) that are very relevant in the modern, connected, digitized, and (borrowing a word from this class) mediated world. I learned a lot, enjoyed the lectures, and can see the application of what I learned outside the virtual classroom. Thank you! | quality of the lectures – course | Content | lecturing approach, and audiovisual production – | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| V9_aHBU7EeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Internet Giants is a great course! It's a tremendous value - you will learn a ton of GREAT content for little money, from a GREAT professor at a GREAT university. There are many positive things to say about the course, but I want to point out 3: (1) embedded hyperlinks that take the student directly to the reading material online, (2) the organization of the content into "threads" of historical developments of different types of "media platforms", and (3) the production and editing of the course videos are excellent. If you're a lawyer, technologist, economist, hi-tech business person, or are just curious about how hi-tech businesses are created, regulated, and evolve, you will get a lot out of this course. | will learn a ton of GREAT | Content | for little money, from a GREAT | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| V9_aHBU7EeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Internet Giants is a great course! It's a tremendous value - you will learn a ton of GREAT content for little money, from a GREAT professor at a GREAT university. There are many positive things to say about the course, but I want to point out 3: (1) embedded hyperlinks that take the student directly to the reading material online, (2) the organization of the content into "threads" of historical developments of different types of "media platforms", and (3) the production and editing of the course videos are excellent. If you're a lawyer, technologist, economist, hi-tech business person, or are just curious about how hi-tech businesses are created, regulated, and evolve, you will get a lot out of this course. | online, (2) the organization of the | Content | into " threads" of historical developments | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| V9_aHBU7EeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Great course. A very solid and current approach to media. The content has high quality and is well balanced. Value added for sure. | and current approach to media. The | Content | has high quality and is well | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | It was really a nice experience learning the fundamentals of Project Management. An eyeopener to the all the experienced workforce. The Course is really well designed including the content, pedagogy, Quizzes, Evaluation criteria and the assignments. At the end of the week, it will make sure you are well equipped the fundamental tools and try implementing them in the practical scenarios. | is really well designed including the | Content | pedagogy, Quizzes, Evaluation criteria and the | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | The course is very well designed and the instructor is very clear and engaging! Moreover, a lot of useful tools and techniques are shown during sessions. Case studies could be improved, starting from the quality of videos and contents. | from the quality of videos and | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | This class was a good overview of the topic of project management with an entertaining and well spoken teacher. This videos and content were engaging but not over whelming. | well spoken teacher. This videos and | Content | were engaging but not over whelming. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | The course provided a bunch of meaningful insights. Many techniques to approach project management were presented. I feel much more prepared to handle a project now. Excellent content! | to handle a project now. Excellent | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | I found its contents to be very useful for my business. | I found its | Content | to be very useful for my | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | good content and focused presentation | good | Content | and focused presentation | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | I liked this course very much, relevant content, great instructor. | liked this course very much, relevant | Content | great instructor. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | Excellent content and great teacher | Excellent | Content | and great teacher | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | Exceptional course with the content being simple and effective. | Exceptional course with the | Content | being simple and effective. | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | Course content is so nice | Course | Content | is so nice | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | Very well structured, content well explained and extremely relevant for someone starting Project Management. | Very well structured, | Content | well explained and extremely relevant for | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | Content is really well tailored and the course is well spread over the 4 weeks. The material is good and the explanation is good. Tools provided do the job. | | Content | is really well tailored and the | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| VfuJSYYDEeW99gozy_2pgw | Very good content, but technical issues (poor closed captioning, ambiguous question on the exams, a couple of readings that were a little esoteric for an introductory course) led me to mark the course down a star. | Very good | Content | but technical issues (poor closed captioning, | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| vGGtBxVGEeW_mxLPrCkAqw | Quite disappointed, I thought we'd have something more structured or at least different from the previous courses. The content is here and good, but I was expecting reviews from pro U.X and not student like the previous courses. The good upgrade though is that we have clear examples of submission before we send ours. | different from the previous courses. The | Content | is here and good, but I | Positive | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| vGGtBxVGEeW_mxLPrCkAqw | This course was delivered 6-months behind schedule and the assignments half-way through the course can't even be completed due to technical problems and sloppy content. When students try to seek support to fix the issues, nothing is done and they receive no response. The specialization started so well, but the care that was taken to craft the specialization course content in the beginning has been lost in the later courses. | due to technical problems and sloppy | Content | When students try to seek support | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| vGGtBxVGEeW_mxLPrCkAqw | This course was delivered 6-months behind schedule and the assignments half-way through the course can't even be completed due to technical problems and sloppy content. When students try to seek support to fix the issues, nothing is done and they receive no response. The specialization started so well, but the care that was taken to craft the specialization course content in the beginning has been lost in the later courses. | taken to craft the specialization course | Content | in the beginning has been lost | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | great content | great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Colleen van Lent made this so easy and clear to understand. There were some shortfalls with the peer reviewed grading which is the only reason why this isn't a five star review, but the content and the teaching style were absolutely spectacular! I am part of a few novice web designer groups on Facebook and I've already recommended this course to hundreds of members. | a five star review, but the | Content | and the teaching style were absolutely | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Excellent intro to CSS. Colleen van Lent is awesome. I really enjoy her teaching style. The content is clear and interesting. | really enjoy her teaching style. The | Content | is clear and interesting. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | The course is really well paced and good contents. However I think it should have a bit more indepth contents regarding CSS rules/priorties. | is really well paced and good | Content | However I think it should have | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | The course is really well paced and good contents. However I think it should have a bit more indepth contents regarding CSS rules/priorties. | should have a bit more indepth | Content | regarding CSS rules/priorties. | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | The contents are so useful. I am lucky to found this course | The | Content | are so useful. I am lucky | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | The material and resources are excellent. This was the first course I took without any mentors or tutors, so my participation in the discussions was very high. The following could be improved: inclusion of 'type="text/css"' in the <LINK> element; perils of alternating between background and background-color, especially in complicated, long style sheets; links to Coursera lecture videos and materials from the students' side rather than teacher's; explanation for Assignment One if the text-align:center style should be applied to the <a> or the <nav> element (I used the nav because I wanted the menu styled below the H1 heading, which is where the menu is positioned in later assignments). I'm deducting a star for Coursera's unwillingness to respond in its Community Help Forums to its method of assigning peer review assignments and for introducing new 'features' without notice to its educational content partners. I shouldn't have to engage a very busy professional to intercede on the students' behalf. Despite the large population of people taking the class (or is that cumulative? Coursera doesn't specify), about twenty students were active on the Discussion Forums. I felt we students were left on our own which is fine as long as we all are aware that the more peer reviews we do, the more we can learn from each other. I also did not like the error message in red 'There was an upload error. Please try again' coexisting with the 'Your assignment was submitted successfully!' in green on the same page. This confused lots of us and those of us who'd never used the transloadit.com script for uploading our assignments for peer-review would only know of transmission error if classmates flagged our submissions. I identified this as an issue and Coursera didn't respond because I'm only a lowlife deadbeat student. Never mind that there are people who've paid for the courses who encounter the same issues on this platform. | 'features' without notice to its educational | Content | partners. I shouldn't have to engage | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | As a beginner, this is a must take course! Dr. Colleen van Lent is excellent at hitting the right points, delivering the right content at the right time. Easy for anyone to learn. | the right points, delivering the right | Content | at the right time. Easy for | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | More than a simple introduction to css. Great content, great delivery. | a simple introduction to css. Great | Content | great delivery. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | The lectures were well-paced and thoughtfully curated. Just enough content and assignments to get you started; the prof says repeatedly she assumes you're going to treat this as a starting point and experiment on your own. | well-paced and thoughtfully curated. Just enough | Content | and assignments to get you started; | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| vIC_m1i_EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | Not so guided as the previous ones. And this one is harder. But still great content, well organized, great teachers. | one is harder. But still great | Content | well organized, great teachers. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| vIC_m1i_EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | Highly recommended! Instructors are awesome and the content couldn´t be any clearer. Thanks! | recommended! Instructors are awesome and the | Content | couldn´t be any clearer. Thanks! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| vIC_m1i_EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | Excellent third step course in the series. All the content presented is fun, interesting, informative and useful! | course in the series. All the | Content | presented is fun, interesting, informative and | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| vIC_m1i_EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | Excellent in content and delivery!!!! | Excellent in | Content | and delivery! ! ! ! | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| viDCUUkuEeagxwr1Kg22cw | The material is thorough and liked the content. The testing aspect/ quez, u have to pay ! | material is thorough and liked the | Content | The testing aspect/ quez, u have | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| viDCUUkuEeagxwr1Kg22cw | Great Content ! | Great | Content | ! | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| VIUTXB0IEea20BJooCBlFw | This is one of the best courses I've taken to date through Coursera. The course content is useful in all walks of life and the instructor is thorough and engaging. I would highly recommend this course to everyone interested in looking for ways to structure better arguments. | to date through Coursera. The course | Content | is useful in all walks of | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| VIUTXB0IEea20BJooCBlFw | I am 3 weeks into the course and can categorically say that it one of the best courses I have ever taken. Besides the professor's impeccable knowledge, his amazing command over fluid teaching is admirable. I really like the content where the learners are taught how to dissect (and construct) an argument for a broad range of areas where they might find its use. People who are thinking of taking it, make sure you commit at least 5 hours every week. Absorb and enjoy! | is admirable. I really like the | Content | where the learners are taught how | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| vrTPjkqzEeWB9g55-yieoQ | An excellent course that covers the fundamental concepts for survey design and administration. The content was well structured and presentations and study material was rich and comprehensive. | for survey design and administration. The | Content | was well structured and presentations and | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| vrTPjkqzEeWB9g55-yieoQ | There should be more than just lectures. I find the overall content to be very exciting but at times the lectures get a little boring and monotonous maybe. | just lectures. I find the overall | Content | to be very exciting but at | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| VTyPXbMXEeW-cQqGkhsQ8w | Some times the videos aren´t in a logical sync with the upcoming activity, or the content from the video is somewhat vague and then not clearly explained in the class. | with the upcoming activity, or the | Content | from the video is somewhat vague | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| vU4CeqTaEeW2ORLv1OUyFQ | Pros: Really motivating! Cons: Not much real content even for a beginner, too short. | Really motivating! Cons: Not much real | Content | even for a beginner, too short. | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| vU4CeqTaEeW2ORLv1OUyFQ | Practical and easy to understand course! I'm a practitioner of Sports/Exercise Science, but I believe this is 'digestible' for non-practitioners, as the content and delivery allows for easy understanding. Thank you! | is 'digestible' for non-practitioners, as the | Content | and delivery allows for easy understanding. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| VuRXs3EiEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | The course is very preliminary. Its content can be covered in one session and does not need 4 weeks. The assignments were not clear enough. The course material can not be downloaded and can not be retrieved or used as reference after finishing the course, unlike other courses I have taken with Coursera, but in other University. | The course is very preliminary. Its | Content | can be covered in one session | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| VuRXs3EiEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | very good content and standard basics | very good | Content | and standard basics | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| VuRXs3EiEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | This course is terrible for many reasons. Firstly, the amount of content is ridiculously small - only about 20 minutes of video lectures per week. Moreover, more than 50% of content is just non-relevant. Secondly, practical assignments are very poorly planned: 1) in weeks 3 peer graded assignment students are asked to save Tableau workbooks as twbx files, even though this feature is not supported by Tableau Public that is used in this course. The assignment itself is just opening and saving file in Tableau. 2) in weeks 4 peer graded assignment you just asked to write some vaguely defined 1 page description. It doesn't include any Tableau-related activities. Thirdly, quizzes are ambiguous and very general. Overall, this course is just a waste of time. For comparison, you can easily get more useful information about Tableau from the 4 minute long "Getting started" video on the Tableau website than from this course. Just wonder how Coursera allows such courses to be places on the platform. | many reasons. Firstly, the amount of | Content | is ridiculously small - only about | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| VuRXs3EiEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | This course is terrible for many reasons. Firstly, the amount of content is ridiculously small - only about 20 minutes of video lectures per week. Moreover, more than 50% of content is just non-relevant. Secondly, practical assignments are very poorly planned: 1) in weeks 3 peer graded assignment students are asked to save Tableau workbooks as twbx files, even though this feature is not supported by Tableau Public that is used in this course. The assignment itself is just opening and saving file in Tableau. 2) in weeks 4 peer graded assignment you just asked to write some vaguely defined 1 page description. It doesn't include any Tableau-related activities. Thirdly, quizzes are ambiguous and very general. Overall, this course is just a waste of time. For comparison, you can easily get more useful information about Tableau from the 4 minute long "Getting started" video on the Tableau website than from this course. Just wonder how Coursera allows such courses to be places on the platform. | week. Moreover, more than 50% of | Content | is just non-relevant. Secondly, practical assignments | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| VxTqEC8iEeWUWxIOAnoaFQ | Great content, excellent Professors and staff. | Great | Content | excellent Professors and staff. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| W-hoIJw3EeWJORITtzkPnQ | Useful. I feel some areas such as strategy, getting to MVP etc could benefit from more case studies and materials to work through. The overall content of the lectures is good but to internalise it there needs to be more 'work' for the students to engage in rather than just a quiz at the end. | materials to work through. The overall | Content | of the lectures is good but | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| W7nFdNmPEeWd4wrZhyGl7w | Great content, I do not suggest to take the course in Spanish, there are some translation issues that can make complex the understanding. | Great | Content | I do not suggest to take | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| w8XFGTVyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Relevant Content | Relevant | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| W9XMEny5EeW3pg6oA-kqJQ | classic content and methodology. Inspiring Lect'ures. | classic | Content | and methodology. Inspiring Lect'ures. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| WaKiiuSYEeSRgCIACxAE0Q | I have not been satisfied with the theoretical content | not been satisfied with the theoretical | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | i loved the course content as well as the teaching style of sir WHITEMAN . thanks to the coursera team. | i loved the course | Content | as well as the teaching style | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Fundamental concepts are explained very well. Explaining concepts through solving problem made it easy to grasp the concept. Contents are short and precise. I loved it. | it easy to grasp the concept. | Content | are short and precise. I loved | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | I finished the course and I think the course is a great first view of what engineering mechanics can offer to the students at the university. I am a mechanical engineer newly graduated at UFRGS and the course was a great experience to recall some of the content learned at the university. | experience to recall some of the | Content | learned at the university. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Hard work but very well explained, lots of exercises and good content from a great university. | explained, lots of exercises and good | Content | from a great university. | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| wD1C7I_eEeWZyg6bf_Oxkw | It is ironic that a course about virtual instruction is one of the worst online courses I have taken. The content was good, if a little outdated (hence the two stars vs only one), but the course design and delivery were lacking. The videos were excruciating for visual learners (or really any non-auditory learners). The video for Week 2, Lesson 2, for example, had a single static image on the screen for eleven minutes. Words were added to the image during that time, but all in all there were 26 words of text on the slide. Really?!? ELEVEN MINUTES. 26 WORDS. Give me a transcript or make it an audio file. Don't keep me chained to my laptop watching a static image for ELEVEN MINUTES! The instructor droned and was clearly reading from a script. She did not even use the video to highlight key terms or spotlight key references. Whenever she mentioned a reference I wanted to look at, I had to either hope it was on the course reference page (many of them weren't there) or try to figure out how to spell the author's name based on her pronunciation of it. It was just really, really hard to get through. The tests were also poorly designed. What states do x y or z. Who cares? I don't live in those states. Which online school has this policy? Again who cares? Maybe a question about why states/schools have different approaches or how outcomes differ between states/schools, but memorizing a laundry list of which state or school has which policies and practices is useless and did not advance the learning objectives in any way. | online courses I have taken. The | Content | was good, if a little outdated | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| wD1C7I_eEeWZyg6bf_Oxkw | I found much of the content to be interesting and timely. However, I thought the quizzes were poorly written. There was no feedback, so as a learner it was hard to grow from errors. Also, there were many that required more than one answer, if you missed one, you missed entire question. Without feedback, it was difficult to know which one you missed. The week 4 lesson content was a bit dense for an introductory course. It was dry and could've been more global. Last, the large lesson assignment was only graded by peers with no feedback from the instructor. | I found much of the | Content | to be interesting and timely. However, | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| wD1C7I_eEeWZyg6bf_Oxkw | I found much of the content to be interesting and timely. However, I thought the quizzes were poorly written. There was no feedback, so as a learner it was hard to grow from errors. Also, there were many that required more than one answer, if you missed one, you missed entire question. Without feedback, it was difficult to know which one you missed. The week 4 lesson content was a bit dense for an introductory course. It was dry and could've been more global. Last, the large lesson assignment was only graded by peers with no feedback from the instructor. | you missed. The week 4 lesson | Content | was a bit dense for an | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| wD1C7I_eEeWZyg6bf_Oxkw | Although the content is good, the course itself does not reflect in any way what a good asynchronous course should be. Where is the discussion board? How can one communicate with the instructor or with other classmates? Although peer review of an assignment is one aspect of asynchronous and synchronous education, said assignment should also be reviewed by an instructor, especially when said instruction carries so much weight. In addition, I think overall the tests are unfair. I was marked wrong twice for a question that asked my opinion! Also, in the "check all that apply" questions, if one misses one of the answers, the whole question is marked wrong. Finally, many of the test questions themselves are irrelevant to the content of the course. One last thing- the course says it's a five week program, but there are only 4 weeks. Something needs to be adjusted. | Although the | Content | is good, the course itself does | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| wD1C7I_eEeWZyg6bf_Oxkw | Although the content is good, the course itself does not reflect in any way what a good asynchronous course should be. Where is the discussion board? How can one communicate with the instructor or with other classmates? Although peer review of an assignment is one aspect of asynchronous and synchronous education, said assignment should also be reviewed by an instructor, especially when said instruction carries so much weight. In addition, I think overall the tests are unfair. I was marked wrong twice for a question that asked my opinion! Also, in the "check all that apply" questions, if one misses one of the answers, the whole question is marked wrong. Finally, many of the test questions themselves are irrelevant to the content of the course. One last thing- the course says it's a five week program, but there are only 4 weeks. Something needs to be adjusted. | questions themselves are irrelevant to the | Content | of the course. One last thing- | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| we5nljlYEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The course content was somewhat scattered and lacked focus. I think the whole topic of the talent pipeline was completely lacking structure and cohesiveness. Cheri's presentations were not as engaging as the others and her slides were poorly prepared - often difficult to read and not necessarily related to the topic at hand | The course | Content | was somewhat scattered and lacked focus. | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| we5nljlYEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | One of the main presenters, who led about half of this course, would greatly benefit from an editor to help them organize their ideas. This, and a presentation style that made me feel "talked down to", similar to reading a story book to a small child, made comprehension of ideas frustratingly difficult. The content they were responsible for covering was why I signed up for a paid multi-course specialization. Though I learned lots of other things I'll no doubt find helpful, I did not walk away with the information I need the most. The other presenters were great, as usual, and presented their topics in a clear, concise manner. | comprehension of ideas frustratingly difficult. The | Content | they were responsible for covering was | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| we5nljlYEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I enjoyed the course materials immensely, the content is well selected and adapted, the sequencing fosters understanding, and the presentors seem to have been born to teach. Looking forward to more courses like this one. | enjoyed the course materials immensely, the | Content | is well selected and adapted, the | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| we5nljlYEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Great course, great content. If I were allowed to do the quizzes without paying, I would have completed the course and most likely gotten the certificate. I can't commit to a course and pay for it before I experience it. | Great course, great | Content | If I were allowed to do | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| we5nljlYEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Started a bit slow but built through an incredibly rich and valuable amount of content and assignments. | incredibly rich and valuable amount of | Content | and assignments. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| we5nljlYEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Two of the weeks' content was not based on specific, cited research, which was disappointing. Inspiring and Motivating Individuals did an excellent job of that, as did two of the four weeks of this course. | Two of the weeks' | Content | was not based on specific, cited | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| we5nljlYEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I found the content of the course very interesting, I really enjoyed the interventions of Jeff Brodsky and Rich Sheridan. What I would have liked, is to make the content more landed to reality. I didn't understand some examples from Cheri Alexander (for example the video of the skaters getting the gold medal) | I found the | Content | of the course very interesting, I | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| we5nljlYEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I found the content of the course very interesting, I really enjoyed the interventions of Jeff Brodsky and Rich Sheridan. What I would have liked, is to make the content more landed to reality. I didn't understand some examples from Cheri Alexander (for example the video of the skaters getting the gold medal) | have liked, is to make the | Content | more landed to reality. I didn't | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| wEl1EleDEeWTbwotamPtlQ | Excellent content and delivery. Gave me a good perspective of history around Israel and Palestine. | Excellent | Content | and delivery. Gave me a good | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| wEl1EleDEeWTbwotamPtlQ | Very bogus and boring content. The monotonous voice gets me! | Very bogus and boring | Content | The monotonous voice gets me! | Negative | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| wEl1EleDEeWTbwotamPtlQ | content is good but its not made interesting. | | Content | is good but its not made | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | While I was primarily taking this course as a prerequisite for the next course in the specialization (which covers MongoDB in a bit more depth), I found this to be a well-organized introduction to a compelling framework. The instructor did a good job of presenting the content in a way that should be accessible for new developers, while still being relevant to experienced developers looking to round out their skills by learning a new framework. Acknowledging that this is a review of the course and not the framework, it's worth noting that Meteor itself is promising in its ability to quickly deploy sophisticated client-server web applications. My firm has well-established boilerplate templates based on Node.js and Gulp.js and a few dozen dependency packages that satisfy many of the same capabilities, but which were developed over a period of months and come with a much steeper learning curve. The scope of modern capabilities that Meteor offers out-of-the-box for "free" is quite impressive, and allows developers to dive into the interesting parts without the overhead of configuring services and establishing a build process. My only criticism is the cost, if you're looking to attain a verified certificate. At least from the perspective of a professional developer, the course was a bit light on content by comparison to other Coursera classes with the same pricing structure. I was able to complete the initial coursework in less than a week, while still attending my day job (although it did take additional time to complete the course project). Ultimately, this would be more compelling at a $49 price point, at least relative to other Coursera offerings. | a good job of presenting the | Content | in a way that should be | Positive | 0.9 | 4.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | While I was primarily taking this course as a prerequisite for the next course in the specialization (which covers MongoDB in a bit more depth), I found this to be a well-organized introduction to a compelling framework. The instructor did a good job of presenting the content in a way that should be accessible for new developers, while still being relevant to experienced developers looking to round out their skills by learning a new framework. Acknowledging that this is a review of the course and not the framework, it's worth noting that Meteor itself is promising in its ability to quickly deploy sophisticated client-server web applications. My firm has well-established boilerplate templates based on Node.js and Gulp.js and a few dozen dependency packages that satisfy many of the same capabilities, but which were developed over a period of months and come with a much steeper learning curve. The scope of modern capabilities that Meteor offers out-of-the-box for "free" is quite impressive, and allows developers to dive into the interesting parts without the overhead of configuring services and establishing a build process. My only criticism is the cost, if you're looking to attain a verified certificate. At least from the perspective of a professional developer, the course was a bit light on content by comparison to other Coursera classes with the same pricing structure. I was able to complete the initial coursework in less than a week, while still attending my day job (although it did take additional time to complete the course project). Ultimately, this would be more compelling at a $49 price point, at least relative to other Coursera offerings. | course was a bit light on | Content | by comparison to other Coursera classes | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | The content from this course is already out of date for Meteor.js and links are broken. | The | Content | from this course is already out | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Mr. Yee-King is a gifted instructor. The course content is presented in an intelligible and clear manner. The only downside (as with many web development courses on Coursera) is that there is no section on how to deploy a Meteor project to the web. According to my own experience, this is not trivial as the long list of issues on the github pages of mup and mupx shows. Of course, there is a business logic behind this: simplicity and developer friendliness comes at a price - Meteor needs a return on investment, which is achieved through charging for deploying on Meteor's Galaxy web backend. Another proposal for improvement: the peer review form does not reflect the tasks of the final project well. Especially the section on the challenges should be more differentiated and should contain an item for each challenge. | is a gifted instructor. The course | Content | is presented in an intelligible and | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Great course content and teacher. Looking forward to the next one. | Great course | Content | and teacher. Looking forward to the | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Excellent course , with great content, and adequate depth. Changed my view on web development frameworks. Do take you from start to finish. | Excellent course , with great | Content | and adequate depth. Changed my view | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Very good introduction. Very good presented. It just makes you want to learn more of Meteor. I can absolutely recommend this course to newbies to Meteor.js. Good methodology regarding speed, content and presentation of the course. | Meteor. js. Good methodology regarding speed, | Content | and presentation of the course. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Very concise contents, and a practical approach to Meteorjs | Very concise | Content | and a practical approach to Meteorjs | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | This is a good course for introduction to Meteor.js. I think the content is very complete for the beginner level. And the Dr. Matthew explains each one the topics, even the details of the code, very well. It was a luck to have taken this course. I'm thinking strongly take the whole specialization. Thanks University of London & Goldsmith. | to Meteor. js. I think the | Content | is very complete for the beginner | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Actual rating would be 4.5/5 but Coursera doesn't allow for half stars. Great introduction to Meteor.js, overall. The professor covered the *how* very well with lots of examples and follow-along coding, but I wished there was a little bit more content on *why* Meteor does what it does. | there was a little bit more | Content | on *why* Meteor does what it | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | The Course content is good. And the teacher is awesome...he explains everything quite well. | The Course | Content | is good. And the teacher is | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Just write in terms of workload. Good mixture of projects and quizzes. Good teacher and content, explained in an easy to understand way. | projects and quizzes. Good teacher and | Content | explained in an easy to understand | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Highly valuable content. The teacher is one the BEST | Highly valuable | Content | The teacher is one the BEST | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | very detailed explanation by the instructor; but the content seems too easy | explanation by the instructor; but the | Content | seems too easy | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Great teacher, Content complete | Great teacher, | Content | complete | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| WKY1X7TrEeWoKQ4rUD57pQ | This course gives absolutely unique insight into the making of Chinese politics. This is a very comprehensive course with content that would be difficult to acquire through other channels. I strongly recommend this course for everyone who wants to start with Chinese politics. | is a very comprehensive course with | Content | that would be difficult to acquire | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | great content ! | great | Content | ! | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | Excellent course! Great content and activities that will make you learn a lot about yourself following a very innovative approach. | Excellent course! Great | Content | and activities that will make you | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | I really enjoyed this MOOC, and I would definitely recommend it to anyone looking to build or strenghten his/her leadership skills. The content of this mooc is really rich, and Valerie and her guest make it quite easy to learn. | or strenghten his/her leadership skills. The | Content | of this mooc is really rich, | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | This was one of the best MOOC I completed recently. Good lecture content that explains various concepts to start building leadership skills and the ACE terminology helps in recollecting the concepts. The assignments in terms of self-portrait and conversation was awesome and was a totally new experience. Loved the course thoroughly and made a good friend as well ! | MOOC I completed recently. Good lecture | Content | that explains various concepts to start | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| wmoTBzyAEeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | Eye opening course, interesting content easily explained concepts and fantastic practice materials. Highly recommend this course to start creating conscience on issues affecting us all. | Eye opening course, interesting | Content | easily explained concepts and fantastic practice | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| wmoTBzyAEeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | Good points: 1) Great instructor; 2) applicable content; 3) great for physics students. Bad points: 1) Lacking of a "Formulae booklet" to use as reminder and reference for formulas and constants - when working on the models for this course; 2) The exercises approach should be reviews, making more use of the tools available in the Coursera interface (example: Assigments in text format (discursive) should use the own coursera interface, instead make us upload .TXT or .DOC files). Extra: I did not finish the course, the format and content do not achieve my personal objectives, as a software developer and environmentalist. But i really enjoyed the general approach and goal. | finish the course, the format and | Content | do not achieve my personal objectives, | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| wnxlH3Q8EeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Very good content. The lessons are clear and relevant, with good examples. The course would be "excellent" if the instructor would be involved with the forums and would answer questions that were posted directly to her. But I still think it is a great deal for managers to take this course! | Very good | Content | The lessons are clear and relevant, | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| wnxlH3Q8EeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Very good audio quality and good pacing and presentation of content. | and good pacing and presentation of | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| wnxlH3Q8EeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Content and course sequence is great. The assessment part showed some issues that can be improved. | | Content | and course sequence is great. The | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| wnxlH3Q8EeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | i supposed that may be i am not very clever so the content and the question after the class also make me confused. a little bit disapoint with this course. but i saw a lot people below think this a good course so may be i am wrong. | am not very clever so the | Content | and the question after the class | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| wnxlH3Q8EeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Basic, but good content | Basic, but good | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Wp6z-dymEeWUwhJ351EtdQ | Very good content. Subject wheel explained and good practical exercises. | Very good | Content | Subject wheel explained and good practical | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Wp6z-dymEeWUwhJ351EtdQ | High level content, comfortable language, practical classes under Homeworks. One of best Coursera courses to take. | High level | Content | comfortable language, practical classes under Homeworks. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| WQMNShxYEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | THE AUDIO QUALITY IS NOT CLEAR BUT CONTENTS ARE VERY USEFUL. | AUDIO QUALITY IS NOT CLEAR BUT | Content | ARE VERY USEFUL. | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| WRmBJpeLEeWiKgp3mpfjeQ | I really enjoyed learning about magic in the middle ages and am grateful for the opportunity offered by the University of Barcelona. The lectures were clearly spoken and the content was good. However, I would have liked to go more into detail about the practices of magic, I missed that a little bit. For example, the specifics of several charms/ingredients/etc are only treated on a few occasions. I have now also enrolled in different courses on Coursera and I can say that this course could have been organised better, with better assignments, quizzes, etc. So there is still room for improvement. | lectures were clearly spoken and the | Content | was good. However, I would have | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| wSAQVkpJEeW8cBKtDAegYw | An excellent introduction or a refresher course to this field! Provides a good amount of content for a 4-week course. The self-paced aspect of the course is also very helpful if you would like to make your own schedule. | field! Provides a good amount of | Content | for a 4-week course. The self-paced | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| wU9rptfZEeSQpiIAC2iNcA | Thanks very much Fred! I really liked the content of your course, it really made me aware of how important it is to be a leader in the Health Care Environment, and how important it is to build quality with all the participants, including the patient. | much Fred! I really liked the | Content | of your course, it really made | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| wU9rptfZEeSQpiIAC2iNcA | I am so impressed with the content of this course as it pertains to how applicable it is to my health care setting. I work as a charge nurse in a small hospital in St Lucia and I can identify. Keep up the good work all. | I am so impressed with the | Content | of this course as it pertains | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Wv_qFVYzEeWKXg4Y7_tPaw | I don't mean to be harsh, but this course is increibly boring and sluggish. The reading material is heavy, the lecturers speak so slowly and dispassionately that it's impossible to engage with the subject. I'm sure that there is really good content here, but I couldn't find it. | sure that there is really good | Content | here, but I couldn't find it. | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good balance between content and presentation | Very good balance between | Content | and presentation | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | I think these courses need to be condensed into a single one as the contents are rather limited individually. | into a single one as the | Content | are rather limited individually. | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | essential content! | essential | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Liked how a lot of content was covered in a small amount of time. Thought the instructor was effective in presenting the important elements of the lectures. Only issue is some typos in the quizzes that were a bit distracting. | Liked how a lot of | Content | was covered in a small amount | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | The content is covered in great depth in this course but pre-reads may help as the course moves up a few notches in technical content. | The | Content | is covered in great depth in | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | The content is covered in great depth in this course but pre-reads may help as the course moves up a few notches in technical content. | up a few notches in technical | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Easy to understand what speaker is trying to explain, Good question design, not easy to pass all but really consistent with lecture content. | all but really consistent with lecture | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| XczDJRhBEeaUCRJWL-pjpQ | I'll strongly recommend this course for those who are interested to introduce themselves to the Social Enterprise world from scratch. Very well explained, easy to understand, logic order for the content, true stories as an examples, inspirational. 100% recommended! | to understand, logic order for the | Content | true stories as an examples, inspirational. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| XeB2pvgkEeS36CIACw8Krw | Quite informative and relevant content, I must say. | Quite informative and relevant | Content | I must say. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| XeB2pvgkEeS36CIACw8Krw | Very good content, instructors, materials and exercise. I give 5 stars with a small remark: Some technical issues, grading and recognition enhancements, would leave this course even better. | Very good | Content | instructors, materials and exercise. I give | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Content is good but there is no practice whatsoever. So much theory can become boring at times. | | Content | is good but there is no | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | This course made me realise how exciting SEO can be. I really like the fact that the course content is update with the latest technologies out there. I am also enjoying the SEO blog references and the reading material provided. Thank you for this enjoyable and fruitful experience! | like the fact that the course | Content | is update with the latest technologies | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | I really liked the structure and the content of this course but I didn't like the assignment questions. The questions went into too much detail instead of questions about understanding the topic. All in all it's a great course for people who want to get into SEO! | really liked the structure and the | Content | of this course but I didn't | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Good information presented, but I can't get past the outdated teaching method of using the first 45 to 60 seconds of each video to talk about what the video is going to cover, then spending 30 seconds repeating those bullet points at the end of each video. Some videos are 4 minutes long, so more than half of the content is not actually content, it is essentially the instructor reading the outline for the upcoming content. It's a waste of both instructor and learner time. There are errors in the materials, and since there is no instructor feedback/interaction, there is no way to find out what was meant (including in reading assignments). All you can do is submit a ticket to get it fixed and hope that it gets corrected for the next people who take this course. | so more than half of the | Content | is not actually content, it is | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Good information presented, but I can't get past the outdated teaching method of using the first 45 to 60 seconds of each video to talk about what the video is going to cover, then spending 30 seconds repeating those bullet points at the end of each video. Some videos are 4 minutes long, so more than half of the content is not actually content, it is essentially the instructor reading the outline for the upcoming content. It's a waste of both instructor and learner time. There are errors in the materials, and since there is no instructor feedback/interaction, there is no way to find out what was meant (including in reading assignments). All you can do is submit a ticket to get it fixed and hope that it gets corrected for the next people who take this course. | of the content is not actually | Content | it is essentially the instructor reading | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Good information presented, but I can't get past the outdated teaching method of using the first 45 to 60 seconds of each video to talk about what the video is going to cover, then spending 30 seconds repeating those bullet points at the end of each video. Some videos are 4 minutes long, so more than half of the content is not actually content, it is essentially the instructor reading the outline for the upcoming content. It's a waste of both instructor and learner time. There are errors in the materials, and since there is no instructor feedback/interaction, there is no way to find out what was meant (including in reading assignments). All you can do is submit a ticket to get it fixed and hope that it gets corrected for the next people who take this course. | reading the outline for the upcoming | Content | It's a waste of both instructor | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Great content for someone who has no idea what SEO is and who is willing to dig deep after some basic info. | Great | Content | for someone who has no idea | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Course objectives are clear and concise. Course instructor's voice is upbeat and she articulates well. Visuals are simple and focus on key concepts. Course contents follows a logical progressive flow from easy to more complex concepts. Small chunks of information makes it easy to follow. This is an excellent course and definitely worth while the investment. For me, It has sparked a keen interest in the field of SEO and it has build my confidence to proceed to the next level. | and focus on key concepts. Course | Content | follows a logical progressive flow from | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Good content, but blocked quizes in free version is bad idea. | Good | Content | but blocked quizes in free version | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | This course is concise and provides a very good overview of the SEO industry. But I just wish there were more content. I finished all the four weeks' modules and tests within one day. | I just wish there were more | Content | I finished all the four weeks' | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Great introductory course to SEO. The content is brilliant and the lecturer is clear. It would be good if there would be a teaching stuff to assist the students in their threads in the forums. | Great introductory course to SEO. The | Content | is brilliant and the lecturer is | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Nice intro course. A little light on content but I still learned a lot | intro course. A little light on | Content | but I still learned a lot | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Great!!! Powerful Content :) | Great! ! ! Powerful | Content | :) | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | An amazingly structured content, which help you to be from zero to hero!!! | An amazingly structured | Content | which help you to be from | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | An evaluation is always tied to the value it provides in relation to the paid price. On the plus side: 1) It provides an interesting historical perspective of Search Engines, their evolution and the evolution of the algorithms and their purposes. 2) Rebeka May talks slowly and clearly. The transcripts also help in reviewing the contents of each lesson. On the minus side: 1) It is very theoretical and with no practical application. 2) Lots of terminology pops out of the blue without any prior explanation, and would be difficult to understand for a total newbie. Just as a very simple example, backlinks are mentioned several times. What is a " backlink" ?? I know what they are, but not everybody does. 3) There should be real support material, not merely " transcripts" 4) The Peer review does not make any sense. There should be a real test. The peers do not have a "higher" knowledge level to make an evaluation of the alummni. 5) It is not possible to take the quizzes unless you " upgrade" . Presently this costs $ 80. Conclusion: it is an interesting course, but at $ 80 provides no value.Audit the course instead. UC Davies and Coursera should provide this course free of charge or with a voluntary "donation" | transcripts also help in reviewing the | Content | of each lesson. On the minus | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Excellent course materials. The course contents have been methodically planned and structured leading to a solid foundation for SEO learning. | Excellent course materials. The course | Content | have been methodically planned and structured | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | good content | good | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | The pace of the course was great, and the content really helpful and informative. The instructors were engaging and explained topics clearly, they also provided a wealth of additional resources. I highly recommend this course for anyone interested in digital marketing. | the course was great, and the | Content | really helpful and informative. The instructors | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Its excellent. Topic & contents [Including suggested contents ] were too Good] I learnt a lot. Thank you! | Its excellent. Topic & | Content | [Including suggested contents ] were too | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Its excellent. Topic & contents [Including suggested contents ] were too Good] I learnt a lot. Thank you! | excellent. Topic & contents [Including suggested | Content | ] were too Good] I learnt | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | I liked the course contents, especially the Google algorithm evolution and the assignment to do an SEO analysis. I felt the first week content related to the jobs in the field of SEO was a bit long and could have been shortened since many aspects were repeated in the "consulting/agency" and "in-house" roles. | I liked the course | Content | especially the Google algorithm evolution and | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | I liked the course contents, especially the Google algorithm evolution and the assignment to do an SEO analysis. I felt the first week content related to the jobs in the field of SEO was a bit long and could have been shortened since many aspects were repeated in the "consulting/agency" and "in-house" roles. | analysis. I felt the first week | Content | related to the jobs in the | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | As a web developer, I found that I already knew about 98% of the information presented. The final 2% I could have found faster via a Google search than by watching the lectures. It was also a little strange to me that the course began with a segment on job opportunities and how to begin a career in SEO. I feel this would have made more sense after an introduction to the material. I also did not like that the free version of the course did not allow you to complete any of the assignments, as this has not been the case in my other Coursera courses. Not only were you unable to assess your comprehension of the material because of this, but also it meant receiving annoying emails and notifications that I had not completed the module. In other classes I have taken, there are additional resources and content for the paid users. As it stands, I'm really glad I did not pay for this class. I will continue to the next SEO course, because I'm hoping that it will delve more into the technical aspects of optimization, but I am not pleased with the format so far. | taken, there are additional resources and | Content | for the paid users. As it | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | The presentation of this course is top-notched. I hope the content of this course can be longer. I hope the quizzes can be more rigorous and challenging | course is top-notched. I hope the | Content | of this course can be longer. | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| xg_cj6KwEeWiwAqQT7MHVQ | I would definitely recommend this course to anyone at all in the professional world. It is thought-provoking, varied, insightful and full of real-life examples. There was a decent amount of content to get through each week but this was broken up into manageable chunks. Interviews with a range of mature professionals were utilised, offering a range of perspectives and professional experiences. The use of peer group assessment was also very positive - firstly it meant that you actually had to complete the assignments set, unlike other courses on coursera, and it also gave you a sense of being part of a learning community, as well as gaining perspectives from other participants on the course. | There was a decent amount of | Content | to get through each week but | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| xg_cj6KwEeWiwAqQT7MHVQ | I think the Course has great content but there´s too many activities per week, most of the time if you don´t have time free you will loss the deadlines and after all loss the certificate. | I think the Course has great | Content | but there´s too many activities per | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| xg_cj6KwEeWiwAqQT7MHVQ | Without question the content is great, but the written assignment instructions were somewhat vague and did not match the peer review rubric at times (although the mentor did pin a few posts to address the problem). | Without question the | Content | is great, but the written assignment | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| XJUJYyzXEeWWqBIFfWmDPQ | It was very nice experience doing this course. Very nice contents and very good explanation. | experience doing this course. Very nice | Content | and very good explanation. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| XJUJYyzXEeWWqBIFfWmDPQ | Good content | Good | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| XJUJYyzXEeWWqBIFfWmDPQ | This could probably be better broken into two one week courses "History of Phone Technology" and "Intro to IoT". Many reviewers say they bail out in first few lectures because content seems too far removed from IoT. I enjoyed the last few lectures with examples of IoT, but could have skipped the rest. | out in first few lectures because | Content | seems too far removed from IoT. | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | I found this a very good course, the reason I rate it so low is because the quizzes had a minimum of questions and these were very basic ones. The actual course content was interesting and informative and covered in depth . | very basic ones. The actual course | Content | was interesting and informative and covered | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Very kind voice and great content! | Very kind voice and great | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | This has been an excellent Course. The content itself is very clear and gives you an enormous background about food and eating habits, although is focused mostly in the western diet in USA I think that at least in America continent an other parts of the globe eating habits are similar, Public health is a great concern and I think that in this way we should change completely our habits and stop eating processed food. Congrats Stanford University more courses like this one. | has been an excellent Course. The | Content | itself is very clear and gives | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Interesting topic and very good information Not enough content (my opinion) Tests where way to easy, I could take them all without first watching the videos, and my grade ist above 90%. The questions are (espacially in Week 3 and 4) easy to solve with logic and a basic intelligence. Please work on making it harder! :) | and very good information Not enough | Content | (my opinion) Tests where way to | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | This is a very basic course on food and nutrition. I would consider the majority of the content to be common sense. I would not recommend it if you already have an interest or general knowledge of nu | would consider the majority of the | Content | to be common sense. I would | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good content but extremely basic | Good | Content | but extremely basic | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Fantastic content!. Prof Maya condenses healthy eating into concrete and simple item sets - 1.What food items to eat and what to avoid 2. Where to find them in the Supermarket, how to read the nutrition labels on packaged food 3. Healthy cooking with minimal ingredients 4. Awesome recipes for healthy dishes | Fantastic | Content | . Prof Maya condenses healthy eating | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Short, easy to watch videos fulled with high quality content and good ideias to incorporate healthy habbits in our daily life. | watch videos fulled with high quality | Content | and good ideias to incorporate healthy | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | This course is less demanding than I expected/hoped, but nevertheless the content and its delivery was top-notch. The lectures present material in a clear and natural way. Course content is immediately and easily applied to daily life. The video production is the among the best I've seen in online education. Not groundbreaking, but immensely helpful to those unfamiliar with this material. Definitely worth your time. | than I expected/hoped, but nevertheless the | Content | and its delivery was top-notch. The | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | This course is less demanding than I expected/hoped, but nevertheless the content and its delivery was top-notch. The lectures present material in a clear and natural way. Course content is immediately and easily applied to daily life. The video production is the among the best I've seen in online education. Not groundbreaking, but immensely helpful to those unfamiliar with this material. Definitely worth your time. | a clear and natural way. Course | Content | is immediately and easily applied to | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Very good content! Easy to understand and very practical ! Loved it | Very good | Content | Easy to understand and very practical | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Informative and practical. Mixes lectures with real life examples (from the professor's personal life) to validate content. | the professor's personal life) to validate | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Great content! | Great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | It's brief but quite informative. It organizes its content in a way that's both educative and entertaining at the same time. love Maya's style. | but quite informative. It organizes its | Content | in a way that's both educative | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | I really enjoyed this course - the recipes at the end are very nice, even though, gluten free is rather unnecessary, as only a very (very) small group of people actually need gluten free diets. But I liked the other content of the course very much. Thanks for explaining and sharing. | diets. But I liked the other | Content | of the course very much. Thanks | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Very good as a introduction course! Its clear and easy! Congratulations for the contents! | clear and easy! Congratulations for the | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Not much content | Not much | Content | | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good course, easy to follow and informative. I regret that the content was so basic, I would have loved more depth particularly when the instructor is so knowledgeable and such a good speaker! | and informative. I regret that the | Content | was so basic, I would have | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good content | Good | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Amazing content for beginners | Amazing | Content | for beginners | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | I was hoping for something a little more technical. This course might be good for someone who has no previous knowledge of the nutrition content of food or how to cook. It would be perfect for kids getting ready to head off to college who've never cooked for themselves. | no previous knowledge of the nutrition | Content | of food or how to cook. | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | To me , you were preaching to the choir. I have been trying to follow Pollan's ideas for years. I was hoping for new information, but for me it was a rehash of stuff I have heard ad infinite. this did not seem like a class. This seemed more like an advertisement for healthy eating with it constant music and sparse content. Certainly it did not have the rigorous content that would have been required in a college level credited class. It was certainly not as interesting nor as informative as the Berkeley class "edible education 101" Still as an advertisement for good eating it was well done. If you found an audience out there somewhere who had not heard these messages, then you have succeeded and I applaud you for that. | with it constant music and sparse | Content | Certainly it did not have the | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | To me , you were preaching to the choir. I have been trying to follow Pollan's ideas for years. I was hoping for new information, but for me it was a rehash of stuff I have heard ad infinite. this did not seem like a class. This seemed more like an advertisement for healthy eating with it constant music and sparse content. Certainly it did not have the rigorous content that would have been required in a college level credited class. It was certainly not as interesting nor as informative as the Berkeley class "edible education 101" Still as an advertisement for good eating it was well done. If you found an audience out there somewhere who had not heard these messages, then you have succeeded and I applaud you for that. | it did not have the rigorous | Content | that would have been required in | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | This course has given me a completely new understanding of how my body functions and how I can "play around" with my meals to change my body and feel healthier! I thought (with this being an online course) that I would not gather much from the content that I didn't already know, but that definitely was NOT true! Thanks for a great experience! | would not gather much from the | Content | that I didn't already know, but | Negative | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Nice for a first approach, easy to follow. Good content. | first approach, easy to follow. Good | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Michael Pollan is wonderful! Great fundamental tips. Music can be distracting. Maya's speech is a bit slow...Pollan's pace was stronger. Visuals were clean and easy to digest. Content was succinct and memorable. Appreciated the brevity of the videos. Thank you. | were clean and easy to digest. | Content | was succinct and memorable. Appreciated the | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Quality course with valuable content. Good experience! | Quality course with valuable | Content | Good experience! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Very basic content. I am not sure that there was anything new for me in this course. I am born in France and I guess we learn this from our families. | Very basic | Content | I am not sure that there | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| xOBaY1ibEeS-oiIAC0UN8Q | This course has really helped to fill out my piecemeal understanding of the development of rock music. The pace and content of learning has been well considered and Prof Covach is to be congratulated. | of rock music. The pace and | Content | of learning has been well considered | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| xOBaY1ibEeS-oiIAC0UN8Q | I loved the content and found the teacher spectacular. This is a really fun course to take. | I loved the | Content | and found the teacher spectacular. This | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| xOBaY1ibEeS-oiIAC0UN8Q | This course rocks! (no pun intended). Great professor, fun and relevant content, and excellent presentation. | intended). Great professor, fun and relevant | Content | and excellent presentation. | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| xOBaY1ibEeS-oiIAC0UN8Q | Simply great, if you like music you can't miss it. Amazing teaching and contents | can't miss it. Amazing teaching and | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| xRA5cxnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Awesome content ,very well drafted and explained course content. I am thankful to the coursera team, who has discovered such kind of really good course and specialization. | Awesome | Content | , very well drafted and explained | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| xRA5cxnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Awesome content ,very well drafted and explained course content. I am thankful to the coursera team, who has discovered such kind of really good course and specialization. | very well drafted and explained course | Content | I am thankful to the coursera | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| xRA5cxnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Excellent Contents for concepts explained with sample queries and assignments. It is really amazing to go thru all the new concepts within such a short time frame. | Excellent | Content | for concepts explained with sample queries | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| XRy7uCAeEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Absolutely Amazing Content! I loved it! I learned so much my head is spinning! Thank you Professor John M. and Professor Suseela M. for a lovely course! | Absolutely Amazing | Content | I loved it! I learned so | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| XRy7uCAeEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Proof reading needed, for the slides and for the quizzes. Overall, this is a low content course delivered in a rather boring and uninformative way. | quizzes. Overall, this is a low | Content | course delivered in a rather boring | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| xtpKLngcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | I like all the writing courses organized by Wesleyan, I find the content meaningful and the instructors approachable. | organized by Wesleyan, I find the | Content | meaningful and the instructors approachable. | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| xtpKLngcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Great class for the content I needed. I audited this class and benefited from the theory discussion and practical exercises. The class guided me to improve my writing style which was my ultimate goal. | Great class for the | Content | I needed. I audited this class | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| XupniISSEeWcSw7mZ7gPOw | Excellent information rendered throughout the course; very concise and well explained lectures by Prof. Northcraft; minimum content issues; magnificent level of participation from fellow students. So far the best course I've taken online in Coursera or any other platform. | explained lectures by Prof. Northcraft; minimum | Content | issues; magnificent level of participation from | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| XupniISSEeWcSw7mZ7gPOw | Great professor, great content and very well structured! | Great professor, great | Content | and very well structured! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| XupniISSEeWcSw7mZ7gPOw | Unfortunetly I can only give a 3/5. There were more things that I didn't like and think that should be improved. What I liked: Positive to see Illinois keep presenting specializations on Coursera. The material was ok, with clean presentation style. The case studies is a very positive resource to have in the course to think critically. What I didn't like: The course is excessivelly short, with only 30-40 minutes of videos per module. Previous courses in both specialization - digital marketing and improving videos have at least 1.5 to 3 hours of video materials. A huge gap. Also if I benchmark against the top specializations from Wharton and U. Michigan (Business Foundations, Business Analytics, Leading People and Teams and Finance: Valuation and Investing) all of them pack a 1.5 to 3 hours of video lectures. There is a huge gap. Also I didn't found the quizzes challeging. In a digital world content is king - both in quality and quantity. You have quality, but are missing the quantity. Unfortunetly I see a trend - the other course of the managerial economics specialization also is very short. A minor thing that I also didn't like was the form that the slides were presented. As in previous specializations - in my opinion all of the module slides should be in the readings section in only one document, instead of divided in small pieces per video lecture. I hope that yu accept my critic as constructive because I have liked most of Illinois courses and was very impressed by the quality and extensive set of videos in the Improving Business speciaization. | quizzes challeging. In a digital world | Content | is king - both in quality | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| xx-VwD-OEeWBrBIWi3mmCw | While this course has great content, it lacks interactivity, exercises, peer learning opportunities and leaves desiring more real-life use cases and examples. | While this course has great | Content | it lacks interactivity, exercises, peer learning | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| xx-VwD-OEeWBrBIWi3mmCw | It's a very interesting course. The instructor is very good too. However I think there are not as much content as it could be. Each week has only 30 minutes top. | think there are not as much | Content | as it could be. Each week | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| XZomz77LEeWn1ApTWZT9Yw | Positives:- Good practice with the exciting world of script writing Learnt how to use the scriptwriting software Celtx.com Some aspects of the videos were helpful and instructive e.g. teaching us how to write a cold open Areas of improvement:- The beginner's course is entirely graded on peer reviews where one could get a range of divergent opinions on the same story, at times scathing and not constructive. Reviewers (who are purported to be beginners themselves) also at times give seemingly 'blind' grades without sharing constructive comments. The questions that you are graded on e.g. Do you feel immersed in the story? Is the story unique? are highly subjective and solely dependent on the reviewer's fleeting preferences. It would help if the questions were more nuanced and focused on the structure and technical aspects of script writing e.g. format, grammar, three part structure Lessons were too short and instructional (less than 10 mins of videos for each lesson) only for certain areas; it seemed like one of the major takeaways was to keep writing which is sensible but not helpful from a beginner's point of view. Suggestions:- To maintain some objectivity in grading: Mask the general comments section when a reviewer is giving his comments as negative comments from other peers could influence more negativity and vice versa. Give some guidelines on reviewing to prevent the grading process from turning into trolling. Would appreciate more helpful lessons with deeper content! | appreciate more helpful lessons with deeper | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| XZomz77LEeWn1ApTWZT9Yw | This isn't a CLASS it's a workshop. Thank goodness for fee waivers; I would have been so upset if I had spent my money on this course. As someone who has taken Coursera offerings in the past, I cannot cosign the quality of this course. This class seems to suffer from both a lack of structure and time. I believe if the course was longer (allowing for more space between unguided assignments) the class would be a little better. I understand that the Instructor is barred by time constraints (this is only a five week course, and an opt-in one at that), so I do relate to not wanting to inundate the class with reading assignment and lengthy lectures. That said, the guidance and lessons are lacking-- even if the class was longer, I would still only give it 2.5/5 stars. It appeared that the onus was on the Mentors to provide answers; for example, the professor mentioned that our scripts are meant to feature half hour pilots. This left many students writing dramas rather than comedies at a loss, since they were planning for hour long pilots. (This, again, is partially an issue of the class being so short; more time to review = the option to have longer pilots, rather than only accepting half hour pilots in order to allow students to review five different submissions within three days.) Since half hour dramas are unconventional, I asked one of our mentors, JZ (who is great) for examples. The responsibility should not be on the Mentors to find out-- information like that should be included in the prompt; if not discussed in depth, then at least as a link or list of examples to research on your own if you have the time + desire to do so. Especially since the assignment boils down to "break convention with no examples of successful scripts in this fashion." In a class presumably allowing beginningeres/greenhorns to participate, this is irresponsible and flawed teaching. The same goes of the "hints" that are periodically posted (though again, appreciated!) by mentors in the forums-- those definitions and explanations should be included in the meat of the class, not as supplemental elements. In all honesty, if I didn't have prior experience with writing, I oftentimes wouldn't have any idea what was being discussed by the professor. (And one trip through the forums will illustrate that I am not the only one.) The assignments and due dates are oddly crunched together (another time constraint issue, I understand), but the Instructor's videos seem to imply that we should be receiving feedback before proceeding each time? Maybe in a longer course that would work, but here, I didn't even receive written feedback initially, so it would have been a mistake to wait for some to revise by before forging ahead. If this class isn't going to provide a solid foundation to build on, then it should be made clear, upfront. There is nothing wrong with an experience based / motivation-focused class, but that aspect needs to be transparent. "We will not provide 101 teachings/readings." This isn't a class; it's a workshop. It's a makerspace at best. I expected insight and some level of instruction. In one of the lectures, the Instructor literally says: "I'm not a big fan of some of the classic story structures, defining in what must happen in each act. Or the problem, the twist, the resolution, rising action, denouement, fine action, etc." He does not define these terms, nor allude to them ever again. These are key benchmarks in screenwriting. Definitions would be helpful for someone just starting out, even if the Instructor doesn't strictly want us to abide by them. His students should leave the class more informed than when they came. Unless you're lucky and receive a response from a mentor or someone with visible background in script writing, the reviews don't amount to much, because very few enrollees seem to know what is going on enough to provide a meaty assessment. That is the fault of the course, I think, rather than my peers. Likewise, The grading system here is atrocious because of it; few people understand the foundation, and thusly don't know how to format or structure. So to then be graded on a purely pass or fail basis (that, looking through the forums, many students weren't even AWARE of until the first review grades rolled in) is ridiculous. And I am saying that as someone that scored 100% on both assignments that I did stay to complete, so this is not a case of sour grapes, but an observation of inefficiency. I understand that the class is based around "Active Learning", but for active learning to work and bear fruit, students should be able to engage with/analyze/synthesize/evaluate/build upon class content. Which necessitates actual, meaningful content. Content beyond my fellow confused peers, and 2 minute videos illustrating various ways of saying "Write Something Interesting and if it isn't Interesting, people won't care." Not exactly an astute observation that we couldn't glean anywhere but this course. Honestly, my 4th Edition copy of "The Screenwriters Bible" is five times more helpful than this course, and it is about six years out of date. | able to engage with/analyze/synthesize/evaluate/build upon class | Content | Which necessitates actual, meaningful content. Content | Positive | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| XZomz77LEeWn1ApTWZT9Yw | This isn't a CLASS it's a workshop. Thank goodness for fee waivers; I would have been so upset if I had spent my money on this course. As someone who has taken Coursera offerings in the past, I cannot cosign the quality of this course. This class seems to suffer from both a lack of structure and time. I believe if the course was longer (allowing for more space between unguided assignments) the class would be a little better. I understand that the Instructor is barred by time constraints (this is only a five week course, and an opt-in one at that), so I do relate to not wanting to inundate the class with reading assignment and lengthy lectures. That said, the guidance and lessons are lacking-- even if the class was longer, I would still only give it 2.5/5 stars. It appeared that the onus was on the Mentors to provide answers; for example, the professor mentioned that our scripts are meant to feature half hour pilots. This left many students writing dramas rather than comedies at a loss, since they were planning for hour long pilots. (This, again, is partially an issue of the class being so short; more time to review = the option to have longer pilots, rather than only accepting half hour pilots in order to allow students to review five different submissions within three days.) Since half hour dramas are unconventional, I asked one of our mentors, JZ (who is great) for examples. The responsibility should not be on the Mentors to find out-- information like that should be included in the prompt; if not discussed in depth, then at least as a link or list of examples to research on your own if you have the time + desire to do so. Especially since the assignment boils down to "break convention with no examples of successful scripts in this fashion." In a class presumably allowing beginningeres/greenhorns to participate, this is irresponsible and flawed teaching. The same goes of the "hints" that are periodically posted (though again, appreciated!) by mentors in the forums-- those definitions and explanations should be included in the meat of the class, not as supplemental elements. In all honesty, if I didn't have prior experience with writing, I oftentimes wouldn't have any idea what was being discussed by the professor. (And one trip through the forums will illustrate that I am not the only one.) The assignments and due dates are oddly crunched together (another time constraint issue, I understand), but the Instructor's videos seem to imply that we should be receiving feedback before proceeding each time? Maybe in a longer course that would work, but here, I didn't even receive written feedback initially, so it would have been a mistake to wait for some to revise by before forging ahead. If this class isn't going to provide a solid foundation to build on, then it should be made clear, upfront. There is nothing wrong with an experience based / motivation-focused class, but that aspect needs to be transparent. "We will not provide 101 teachings/readings." This isn't a class; it's a workshop. It's a makerspace at best. I expected insight and some level of instruction. In one of the lectures, the Instructor literally says: "I'm not a big fan of some of the classic story structures, defining in what must happen in each act. Or the problem, the twist, the resolution, rising action, denouement, fine action, etc." He does not define these terms, nor allude to them ever again. These are key benchmarks in screenwriting. Definitions would be helpful for someone just starting out, even if the Instructor doesn't strictly want us to abide by them. His students should leave the class more informed than when they came. Unless you're lucky and receive a response from a mentor or someone with visible background in script writing, the reviews don't amount to much, because very few enrollees seem to know what is going on enough to provide a meaty assessment. That is the fault of the course, I think, rather than my peers. Likewise, The grading system here is atrocious because of it; few people understand the foundation, and thusly don't know how to format or structure. So to then be graded on a purely pass or fail basis (that, looking through the forums, many students weren't even AWARE of until the first review grades rolled in) is ridiculous. And I am saying that as someone that scored 100% on both assignments that I did stay to complete, so this is not a case of sour grapes, but an observation of inefficiency. I understand that the class is based around "Active Learning", but for active learning to work and bear fruit, students should be able to engage with/analyze/synthesize/evaluate/build upon class content. Which necessitates actual, meaningful content. Content beyond my fellow confused peers, and 2 minute videos illustrating various ways of saying "Write Something Interesting and if it isn't Interesting, people won't care." Not exactly an astute observation that we couldn't glean anywhere but this course. Honestly, my 4th Edition copy of "The Screenwriters Bible" is five times more helpful than this course, and it is about six years out of date. | class content. Which necessitates actual, meaningful | Content | Content beyond my fellow confused peers, | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| XZomz77LEeWn1ApTWZT9Yw | This isn't a CLASS it's a workshop. Thank goodness for fee waivers; I would have been so upset if I had spent my money on this course. As someone who has taken Coursera offerings in the past, I cannot cosign the quality of this course. This class seems to suffer from both a lack of structure and time. I believe if the course was longer (allowing for more space between unguided assignments) the class would be a little better. I understand that the Instructor is barred by time constraints (this is only a five week course, and an opt-in one at that), so I do relate to not wanting to inundate the class with reading assignment and lengthy lectures. That said, the guidance and lessons are lacking-- even if the class was longer, I would still only give it 2.5/5 stars. It appeared that the onus was on the Mentors to provide answers; for example, the professor mentioned that our scripts are meant to feature half hour pilots. This left many students writing dramas rather than comedies at a loss, since they were planning for hour long pilots. (This, again, is partially an issue of the class being so short; more time to review = the option to have longer pilots, rather than only accepting half hour pilots in order to allow students to review five different submissions within three days.) Since half hour dramas are unconventional, I asked one of our mentors, JZ (who is great) for examples. The responsibility should not be on the Mentors to find out-- information like that should be included in the prompt; if not discussed in depth, then at least as a link or list of examples to research on your own if you have the time + desire to do so. Especially since the assignment boils down to "break convention with no examples of successful scripts in this fashion." In a class presumably allowing beginningeres/greenhorns to participate, this is irresponsible and flawed teaching. The same goes of the "hints" that are periodically posted (though again, appreciated!) by mentors in the forums-- those definitions and explanations should be included in the meat of the class, not as supplemental elements. In all honesty, if I didn't have prior experience with writing, I oftentimes wouldn't have any idea what was being discussed by the professor. (And one trip through the forums will illustrate that I am not the only one.) The assignments and due dates are oddly crunched together (another time constraint issue, I understand), but the Instructor's videos seem to imply that we should be receiving feedback before proceeding each time? Maybe in a longer course that would work, but here, I didn't even receive written feedback initially, so it would have been a mistake to wait for some to revise by before forging ahead. If this class isn't going to provide a solid foundation to build on, then it should be made clear, upfront. There is nothing wrong with an experience based / motivation-focused class, but that aspect needs to be transparent. "We will not provide 101 teachings/readings." This isn't a class; it's a workshop. It's a makerspace at best. I expected insight and some level of instruction. In one of the lectures, the Instructor literally says: "I'm not a big fan of some of the classic story structures, defining in what must happen in each act. Or the problem, the twist, the resolution, rising action, denouement, fine action, etc." He does not define these terms, nor allude to them ever again. These are key benchmarks in screenwriting. Definitions would be helpful for someone just starting out, even if the Instructor doesn't strictly want us to abide by them. His students should leave the class more informed than when they came. Unless you're lucky and receive a response from a mentor or someone with visible background in script writing, the reviews don't amount to much, because very few enrollees seem to know what is going on enough to provide a meaty assessment. That is the fault of the course, I think, rather than my peers. Likewise, The grading system here is atrocious because of it; few people understand the foundation, and thusly don't know how to format or structure. So to then be graded on a purely pass or fail basis (that, looking through the forums, many students weren't even AWARE of until the first review grades rolled in) is ridiculous. And I am saying that as someone that scored 100% on both assignments that I did stay to complete, so this is not a case of sour grapes, but an observation of inefficiency. I understand that the class is based around "Active Learning", but for active learning to work and bear fruit, students should be able to engage with/analyze/synthesize/evaluate/build upon class content. Which necessitates actual, meaningful content. Content beyond my fellow confused peers, and 2 minute videos illustrating various ways of saying "Write Something Interesting and if it isn't Interesting, people won't care." Not exactly an astute observation that we couldn't glean anywhere but this course. Honestly, my 4th Edition copy of "The Screenwriters Bible" is five times more helpful than this course, and it is about six years out of date. | content. Which necessitates actual, meaningful content. | Content | beyond my fellow confused peers, and | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| XZomz77LEeWn1ApTWZT9Yw | I should suggest my fellow Coursera students not to waste their money and time for this course. You'll learn a lot more than this course has to offer if you consult some websites with screenwriting tutorial blogs, read books and write on your own. I am a PhD student of theoretical film studies and and a fan of Coursera courses. I was eager to learn screenwriting as an interesting hands-on course. Well, it's project-based alright, but where's the real guidance?? This is a lazily designed course with poor content and almost zero guidance. The videos are very short and feels like a layman is trying to motivate you to write something, that's all. No methods explained other than some terminologies like bible, acts, outline being thrown at you. No examples, no comparisons, no detailed approaches. Lastly, scriptwriting has a significant difference with other humanities course. Being peer-reviewed doesn't help here -- a total novice can not effectively judge another newbie's work nor give them quality feedback. | a lazily designed course with poor | Content | and almost zero guidance. The videos | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| XZomz77LEeWn1ApTWZT9Yw | I loved the course and content, but, found the process cumbersome. I think that some of these issues have now been addressed and should not present a problem in future programs. | I loved the course and | Content | but, found the process cumbersome. I | Positive | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| X_ZG4rVzEeWq2A7HIftJ6w | Really enjoyed this course and I learned a lot. The content is interesting, engaging and informative. I now feel confident to get started on the graphic novel I've had in mind for some time, as well as starting a webcomic archive. I would recommend this course to anyone remotely interested in making comics. It's a great kick starter! Only reason I haven't given 5 stars is I was expecting it to be more compatible with digital methods of creating art. The course is structured to use hard copy printing and actual pens/pencils/inks, whereas I use a Wacom tablet and pen with Sketchbook Pro. So I had some fiddling around to do to access the course materials in a format that was useful to me. Also, the final week instructions seemed to be directed at a class putting their comics together in a compendium for the final print. I found it a bit confusing. | and I learned a lot. The | Content | is interesting, engaging and informative. I | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| X_ZG4rVzEeWq2A7HIftJ6w | I had high expectations of this course, but must admit I'm pretty disappointed. Navigating the course feels unintuitive and clunky. Not sure if that's just a Coursera thing though. The actual content (video) looks great, but is unfortunately exceedingly brief, so much so, that it feels like this entire course could have just been a single article. In fact, there's not much presented that really benefits from the video format. Most 'instruction' in the course is centered around brief talks, or artist interviews, and thus you're often just looking at two people talking, or an artist showing you their work while they talk. You never even see anyone draw to my recollection. The 'work' in the course feels rather 'phoned in' at times too. Questions such as "What did you find interesting about the video you just watched?" seem unnecessary, and too elementary to contain any real value, especially when the videos are so brief. Having said all that, I DO think the people who made it are genuine, and have passion for comics, and comics education, and I'll continue to follow their efforts on that front. | a Coursera thing though. The actual | Content | (video) looks great, but is unfortunately | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | In my opinion, the final exam was weak since it was compacting the quizzes throughout the course. The content could be 50% theory and 50% practice which i consider that it was more theoretical. | the quizzes throughout the course. The | Content | could be 50% theory and 50% | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | Absolutely brilliant course, excellent content. Only problem is that it is impossible to get help if you need support. | Absolutely brilliant course, excellent | Content | Only problem is that it is | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | I love the scale-up part of the course. It gives me a great insight of upscaling of solar cells. But in general, the course is lack of content in depth. I would prefer a more hard core course with detailed explanation of the working mechanism of solar cells. | general, the course is lack of | Content | in depth. I would prefer a | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | I would give this course a five based on the content it provides, but it lacks in three key areas. First, no forums, really? This is how we learn when we have NO instructor or TA support. They also lack workable calculations. Second, there was a GLARING error in a quiz that no one caught, showing a near complete lack of understanding of energy conversion. Third, the quiz engine has had a number of errors in the calculations. specifically in formula formatting. These are advanced systems that clearly need more testing. But all in all, this is GREAT content if you want to learn about organic (polymer OPV) solar cells. | course a five based on the | Content | it provides, but it lacks in | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | I would give this course a five based on the content it provides, but it lacks in three key areas. First, no forums, really? This is how we learn when we have NO instructor or TA support. They also lack workable calculations. Second, there was a GLARING error in a quiz that no one caught, showing a near complete lack of understanding of energy conversion. Third, the quiz engine has had a number of errors in the calculations. specifically in formula formatting. These are advanced systems that clearly need more testing. But all in all, this is GREAT content if you want to learn about organic (polymer OPV) solar cells. | all in all, this is GREAT | Content | if you want to learn about | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| y20FTlDPEeWMlwoziUhyxQ | Very interesting, very interactive course. I have learnt a lot of new concepts in marketing analytics and it accentuates my willingness to continue my learning in this area. Thank you for the great content! | area. Thank you for the great | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| y20FTlDPEeWMlwoziUhyxQ | This was an excellent course from content to instruction to testing. I would highly recommend this course if you want to truly understand how and why to measure marketing performance. The instructor was fantastic, and I thoroughly enjoyed his banter with cameraman Kyle and his squash challenges. | This was an excellent course from | Content | to instruction to testing. I would | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| y20FTlDPEeWMlwoziUhyxQ | It has great content. A good investment of your time. | It has great | Content | A good investment of your time. | Positive | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| y8mxj203EeWbyw5d8C-Blw | The content was VERY scarce, and it was obvously prepared in a hurry. This course just touches very superficially the subject to be studied. Not meeting minimum quality standards. | The | Content | was VERY scarce, and it was | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| yBXw74emEeWRYRLoE9jCoQ | excellent course. very well presented with interesting content | course. very well presented with interesting | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| yBXw74emEeWRYRLoE9jCoQ | Very informative, balanced, and has great scientific content supporting the coaching lessons. Top notch on content, but could use more interactive systems and more dynamic lesson practices. | informative, balanced, and has great scientific | Content | supporting the coaching lessons. Top notch | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| yBXw74emEeWRYRLoE9jCoQ | Very informative, balanced, and has great scientific content supporting the coaching lessons. Top notch on content, but could use more interactive systems and more dynamic lesson practices. | the coaching lessons. Top notch on | Content | but could use more interactive systems | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| YcfRNRoCEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This course as much content in it and it's difficult to have an holistic idea how it all fits together. Some videos are taught having the same problem like, for example, some tools/themes are presented without us knowing what they are for. E.g., Chi-squared test and null hypothesis. Only after a while we understand their use. This bring a lot of overhead to us who are learning. Some videos seem to have been re-worked over time and present cuts or jumps. As for assignments, they should be better worked because some questions are not clear or misleading regarding the criteria that you want to evaluate. For example, I already reported that in Question 2. and 3. of the assignment for the 3rd week. The example you give is a short introduction with two problems: 1) "I did the website", which can make the participant not to be at ease to criticize and 2) we're no evaluating the participant performance but the website. Next, you ask us to rewrite the introduction, which we do with those two problems in mind. Now, when we do the peer review we realize that you're expecting for us to rate the new introduction based on having "early prototype" and "user feedback". The original problems just seem not to count. Only by chance you can eventually write the new introduction touching the points that count for grading. | This course as much | Content | in it and it's difficult to | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| YcfRNRoCEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I didn't like the way contents were organized. It was too much information in a very short time. | I didn't like the way | Content | were organized. It was too much | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| YcfRNRoCEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Superb breadth of the content. | Superb breadth of the | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| YcfRNRoCEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Interesting topic, however I quitted. Video lectures were recorded almost phrase by phrase, making it too hard to follow the contents properly | it too hard to follow the | Content | properly | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Course content is good, however instructions for the assignments are not complete. Often, instructions for the assignments that are required in the grading criteria are buried in the discussion forums, sometimes in multiple threads. And the method of grading is also only explained in the discussion forum. This can lead to the peer review grades being difficult to assign. The assignment pages should be updated to properly include ALL requirements and an explanation of how to grade the assignment. | Course | Content | is good, however instructions for the | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I like most of them, but I think it is kind of too many contents | it is kind of too many | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I don't recommend this class. Jogesh K. Muppala has very labored English and his pace and verbosity make the lectures hard to get through. I've turned in around 10 assignments and have yet to get a grade on anything. The course content is poorly organized and executed. Peer grading is just dumb (and clearly doesn't work, since I have yet to get a single assignment back). When you turn in assignment files, they cannot be opened (and we found out from an apparent student how to get past the technical issues). Questions about the class and submitting assignments went unanswered. My advice, save your money and don't take this class. | a grade on anything. The course | Content | is poorly organized and executed. Peer | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent for absolute beginners! But, if you have good experience in CSS & JavaScript you might play it at 1.5X, it is too informative to be attended by someone who knows even a little, it might be boring, then. Generally, the course is very informative, rich, instructions based and have very good exercises covering all the course content with a good-as-a-start hands on experience. | good exercises covering all the course | Content | with a good-as-a-start hands on experience. | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great course , great teaching style and content :) Loved the course. | course , great teaching style and | Content | :) Loved the course. | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Wonderful course, well designed content, exercise and assignment. Only that difficulties of the assignment could be improved so as to ensure bette learning. We want more challenge! lol | Wonderful course, well designed | Content | exercise and assignment. Only that difficulties | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent course. Well taught by Prof. Muppala. Instructor has covered all key points of Bootstrap. Towards the end, he is appropriately introduced node.js and bower. His restaurant example is very appropriate for the course contents and builds continuity through out the course. | is very appropriate for the course | Content | and builds continuity through out the | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excelent course. The teacher is amazing and the course content is great!!! | teacher is amazing and the course | Content | is great! ! ! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent instructor. Good content, and very good explanations. Very good additional resources. | Excellent instructor. Good | Content | and very good explanations. Very good | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good Course ,Good content for Bootstrap. | Good Course , Good | Content | for Bootstrap. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A large portion of the course is just copy and pasting code that is provided to you. While the code that is pasted is explained, and a lot of content is covered as a result of not having to write it, I feel my overall retention is much lower than in other courses. | is explained, and a lot of | Content | is covered as a result of | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent contents!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | Excellent | Content | ! ! ! ! ! ! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | First, the assignments always had poor instructions. It wasn't until grading time you would find out what the criteria are. (After your assignment is submitted) Secondly, there was no documentation/help for the fact the Windows needs a webserver to run content in this section. (Many versions of Windows can't do this) Discovered/resolved over many hours, when course content would not work. The actual course content was sparse/not much to it other than "Bootstrap bootstrap bootstrap." After how good the first course was/how much ground it covered, this course was frustrating, poorly documented, and a disappointment. | Windows needs a webserver to run | Content | in this section. (Many versions of | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | First, the assignments always had poor instructions. It wasn't until grading time you would find out what the criteria are. (After your assignment is submitted) Secondly, there was no documentation/help for the fact the Windows needs a webserver to run content in this section. (Many versions of Windows can't do this) Discovered/resolved over many hours, when course content would not work. The actual course content was sparse/not much to it other than "Bootstrap bootstrap bootstrap." After how good the first course was/how much ground it covered, this course was frustrating, poorly documented, and a disappointment. | Discovered/resolved over many hours, when course | Content | would not work. The actual course | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | First, the assignments always had poor instructions. It wasn't until grading time you would find out what the criteria are. (After your assignment is submitted) Secondly, there was no documentation/help for the fact the Windows needs a webserver to run content in this section. (Many versions of Windows can't do this) Discovered/resolved over many hours, when course content would not work. The actual course content was sparse/not much to it other than "Bootstrap bootstrap bootstrap." After how good the first course was/how much ground it covered, this course was frustrating, poorly documented, and a disappointment. | would not work. The actual course | Content | was sparse/not much to it other | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course content is very good! but i got stuck sometimes because some program installation is very annoying(ex... bower...). | This course | Content | is very good! but i got | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Really nice content. Great teacher | Really nice | Content | Great teacher | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good content, and covered a lot in a short span of time | Good | Content | and covered a lot in a | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I concur with others of a similar opinion on this course: Assignment instructions/criteria differ from the grading rubric criteria. Assignments mostly copy and paste. Referring people to the Bootstrap docs as reference defeats the purpose of an instructor. Many of the assignments required you to do things against best practices, like inserting inline styles to make your element look like the instructor's screenshot of his page. The last week's content seemed to be a slapdash mix of bits and pieces, and trying to inform people about Node modules via solving a quadratic equation seemed really strange. How about an example from the real world, like even an e-commerce application? (In the comments on this, the instructor said there wasn't time in this course to explain Node modules, but that he provided a "clearer" example in the Node.js course. Hunh? Why wouldn't you do a simpler example in the drive-by assignment?) Instructor consistently mispronounced words that are CENTRAL to the field, which just seemed weird and made me question his credibility. This might sound petty, but kuh-rooze-zel for the word Carousel? It would be like a fashion designer mis pronouncing tulle as tull-ee or bias as bye-ez. Just not impressed. I am glad my employer paid the tuition and not me. The only positive was it enforced a schedule and structure for me to try my hand at Bootstrap. I had already worked with Foundation. | of his page. The last week's | Content | seemed to be a slapdash mix | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Course content is good and it is well structured. Instructor is also quite knowledge and explains the concepts well. Definitely recommended. | Course | Content | is good and it is well | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I'm feeling great doing this specialization. Thank you by the valuable content. | specialization. Thank you by the valuable | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great way to get started with Bootstrap's functionality and gives you a way to go past the short but important course content and figuring things out by yourself. | past the short but important course | Content | and figuring things out by yourself. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent content describing bootstrap | Excellent | Content | describing bootstrap | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Awesome Course. One of the best courses , i have been part of on coursera. well paced, very rich in content, very good delivery of the ideas,. Assignments very good. A value for time i just wish practice quiz to have more number of question, and more challenging. A VERY SPECIAL THANKS TO JOGESH. THANKS A LOT | coursera. well paced, very rich in | Content | very good delivery of the ideas, | Positive | 0.9 | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great professor, content and learn experience! I recommend it to everyone who is interested in the topic! | Great professor, | Content | and learn experience! I recommend it | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent tutor, excellent contents in notes. In one word "Outstanding" | Excellent tutor, excellent | Content | in notes. In one word " | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very generous and clearly delivered content. Most Coursera courses only manage to scratch the surface due to time and attention span restrictions, but this one really tries to provide a complete overview of the many possibilities that you can explore later by yourself. | Very generous and clearly delivered | Content | Most Coursera courses only manage to | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Easy to learn, great contents | Easy to learn, great | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The explanation with examples is pretty clear to understand. Course contents are perfect. | is pretty clear to understand. Course | Content | are perfect. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | An excellent course about bootstrap with excellent content videos and exercises | excellent course about bootstrap with excellent | Content | videos and exercises | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A good course, content are a little bit too much in 4 weeks study. Exercises and assignment are easy. | A good course, | Content | are a little bit too much | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Course was amazing , Moreover the professor knows how to deliver the content and make it simple and easy. Good part it starts from scratch to build a web with bootstrap. | professor knows how to deliver the | Content | and make it simple and easy. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good content, lots of exercises to get familiar, very good professor. | Very good | Content | lots of exercises to get familiar, | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course is a requisite for anyone wanting to learn and apply frameworks for client side web development. What takes this course to 5-stars is the instructor, Jogesh Muppala. Aside from his humour, he prepares the content of this course in such an unambiguous and clear format that I think the material would be enjoyed by even the most diehard non-techy. There is a wide assortment of Coursera experiences but I would say that this should be the type other instructors aspire to duplicate. | from his humour, he prepares the | Content | of this course in such an | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | the course contents are great and understandable but I have a problem with the lake of details information the instructor sometimes forget to provide.. | the course | Content | are great and understandable but I | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| yeli1ehUEeSBtCIAC3lLIA | Exceptional course content. Very creative way to make students learn. | Exceptional course | Content | Very creative way to make students | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Despite the pertinent content, the way the instructor gave the classes could have been way more intuitive. You'll find videos on the web that can help you with the subjects covered and do a better job explaining the concepts. Disappointing. | Despite the pertinent | Content | the way the instructor gave the | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Had to take help from outside to complete this course. Lot of improvement required in course content. | Lot of improvement required in course | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | This course actually helped me to practice and to obtain a better intuition of the most basic Statistical Inference ideas. It covers up little content, but it focuses more on the practical understanding than on the maths. After taking it I feel like I can go and take a much more math-heavy course and I wont feel lost. | Inference ideas. It covers up little | Content | but it focuses more on the | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Content was Great, difficult to understand some times. I had to review more sources to get the clearer idea. Totally enjoyed the challenge. | | Content | was Great, difficult to understand some | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Content runs a bit fast but good course for stat inference with R focus. | | Content | runs a bit fast but good | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | An Excellently conceived course with good content and a competitively efficient evaluation components viz., assignments and quizzes. | An Excellently conceived course with good | Content | and a competitively efficient evaluation components | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Content covered in this course was hard to learn, both because it was pitched at a level that realistically was more akin to a wrap up of content already covered (when in fact it was all new content) and because the instructor, Brian Caffo, has not a style that was conducive to teaching. The instructor often would launch into a topic, and then speed through a calculation with basically no explanation. In terms of time, this was one of the most intensive courses in the specialisation, and I'd recommend taking this course alone (not concurrently with other courses) for that very reason. | | Content | covered in this course was hard | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Content covered in this course was hard to learn, both because it was pitched at a level that realistically was more akin to a wrap up of content already covered (when in fact it was all new content) and because the instructor, Brian Caffo, has not a style that was conducive to teaching. The instructor often would launch into a topic, and then speed through a calculation with basically no explanation. In terms of time, this was one of the most intensive courses in the specialisation, and I'd recommend taking this course alone (not concurrently with other courses) for that very reason. | akin to a wrap up of | Content | already covered (when in fact it | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Content covered in this course was hard to learn, both because it was pitched at a level that realistically was more akin to a wrap up of content already covered (when in fact it was all new content) and because the instructor, Brian Caffo, has not a style that was conducive to teaching. The instructor often would launch into a topic, and then speed through a calculation with basically no explanation. In terms of time, this was one of the most intensive courses in the specialisation, and I'd recommend taking this course alone (not concurrently with other courses) for that very reason. | in fact it was all new | Content | and because the instructor, Brian Caffo, | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | At times the content can be confusing. Some points are clearly explained. "Data Analysys Tools" course is a good complement in order to understand the subject. | At times the | Content | can be confusing. Some points are | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | This course goes on a very fast pace and simply does not have the charm of all the other courses in the specialization. I understand that a lot of content is covered within a month, but there should be supplementary course material available. Moreover, TAs should be more active on the forums. I have seen most of the questions just being discussed among the students. A little disappointed. Will probably have to watch all the material again to have confidence with it. | I understand that a lot of | Content | is covered within a month, but | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | This is a great course taught by a clever teacher but... The content is presented in a very dry, not easy to grasp, manner. In several cases, I had to use external sources to understand the content and/or derive it by myself. When I finally understood the content I couldn't understand why it is presented in such a cryptic manner when the concepts are rather simple to grasp and the math not so advanced. Professor Caffo is a good communicator in some occasion (the module on Power for example was incredibly well communicated). But most of the time he just throw us some result without properly setting the context and concepts, as if it was understood that we already know most of what he is talking about. (Not the case!) I plan to make a document that follows the course module and fill in the missing piece of contextual information, derivations and concepts. But this takes a lot of time. If/when it will be completed, I will try to find a way to share it with future generation of students. Because, honestly, the content of this course is not so hard and shouldn't be! | clever teacher but. . . The | Content | is presented in a very dry, | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | This is a great course taught by a clever teacher but... The content is presented in a very dry, not easy to grasp, manner. In several cases, I had to use external sources to understand the content and/or derive it by myself. When I finally understood the content I couldn't understand why it is presented in such a cryptic manner when the concepts are rather simple to grasp and the math not so advanced. Professor Caffo is a good communicator in some occasion (the module on Power for example was incredibly well communicated). But most of the time he just throw us some result without properly setting the context and concepts, as if it was understood that we already know most of what he is talking about. (Not the case!) I plan to make a document that follows the course module and fill in the missing piece of contextual information, derivations and concepts. But this takes a lot of time. If/when it will be completed, I will try to find a way to share it with future generation of students. Because, honestly, the content of this course is not so hard and shouldn't be! | use external sources to understand the | Content | and/or derive it by myself. When | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | This is a great course taught by a clever teacher but... The content is presented in a very dry, not easy to grasp, manner. In several cases, I had to use external sources to understand the content and/or derive it by myself. When I finally understood the content I couldn't understand why it is presented in such a cryptic manner when the concepts are rather simple to grasp and the math not so advanced. Professor Caffo is a good communicator in some occasion (the module on Power for example was incredibly well communicated). But most of the time he just throw us some result without properly setting the context and concepts, as if it was understood that we already know most of what he is talking about. (Not the case!) I plan to make a document that follows the course module and fill in the missing piece of contextual information, derivations and concepts. But this takes a lot of time. If/when it will be completed, I will try to find a way to share it with future generation of students. Because, honestly, the content of this course is not so hard and shouldn't be! | myself. When I finally understood the | Content | I couldn't understand why it is | Negative | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | This is a great course taught by a clever teacher but... The content is presented in a very dry, not easy to grasp, manner. In several cases, I had to use external sources to understand the content and/or derive it by myself. When I finally understood the content I couldn't understand why it is presented in such a cryptic manner when the concepts are rather simple to grasp and the math not so advanced. Professor Caffo is a good communicator in some occasion (the module on Power for example was incredibly well communicated). But most of the time he just throw us some result without properly setting the context and concepts, as if it was understood that we already know most of what he is talking about. (Not the case!) I plan to make a document that follows the course module and fill in the missing piece of contextual information, derivations and concepts. But this takes a lot of time. If/when it will be completed, I will try to find a way to share it with future generation of students. Because, honestly, the content of this course is not so hard and shouldn't be! | generation of students. Because, honestly, the | Content | of this course is not so | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Dividing a week's contents into modules and adding a brief introduction at the beginning of each module makes the course much more clear. Students can also know what programming assignments (swirl) they should do every week. I appreciate those changes in the new class. | Dividing a week's | Content | into modules and adding a brief | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| yFZxWd8aEeWDLBKS83bB7Q | The content of the course has been well-organized and could be easily understood by a non-English speaker. | The | Content | of the course has been well-organized | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| yFZxWd8aEeWDLBKS83bB7Q | The course is great! I loved! The contents are in line with the current reality of Journalism. Congrats to the teachers and the Pennsylvania University. :) | course is great! I loved! The | Content | are in line with the current | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| yFZxWd8aEeWDLBKS83bB7Q | I love this course. All the lessons, activities, assessments and assignments were arranged properly. The content is substantial, both in journalism and English language. I would highly recommend to this course to my colleagues. | and assignments were arranged properly. The | Content | is substantial, both in journalism and | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| yFZxWd8aEeWDLBKS83bB7Q | Well, I enjoyed very much taking part of this course. In my opinion the contents were just grate and according to my English level. Nevertheless, what I would like to have is the amount of hours dedicated to the course writen on the certificate. For this reazon, in my case, this will be my first but also my last of the on-line courses through coursera. Greetings, MSc. Petronio A. Piedra. | this course. In my opinion the | Content | were just grate and according to | Negative | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| yj814XQ_EeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | We've got some extreme quality content here, as always when Philip J Curry is involved. The new student that presents most of the videos has great educational skills. | We've got some extreme quality | Content | here, as always when Philip J | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| yj814XQ_EeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Great content, new cladistic information aviable, super staff! | Great | Content | new cladistic information aviable, super staff! | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| yj814XQ_EeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | The course has incredible content, but you are required to read quite a bit of information via lengthy pdfs prior to the videos. This is not my learning style so I found it challenging. As a Naturalist and bird lover, I was eager to take the course and glad that I did. | The course has incredible | Content | but you are required to read | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| yj814XQ_EeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Interesting subject, but not much content and assessments are way too short. More variety in assignments would be nice too. | Interesting subject, but not much | Content | and assessments are way too short. | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| Yj9bIu-LEeWJRgpWnDLcCw | Enjoyed this course thoroughly. Very good instructor, good content, well-designed. | course thoroughly. Very good instructor, good | Content | well-designed. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| YjCOKcQTEeWI6BLH_IXMZw | The content is well presented and provides remarkable overview of current global politics of energy. | The | Content | is well presented and provides remarkable | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| yJFvuj06EeWBrBIWi3mmCw | In my opinion the positive thing of this course is bringing a very important area to Coursera. But there are some things that I believe could and should be improved. First, Duke has presented courses that have a lot of content, and it is a bit disapointing to only see two modules on this course. At least four modules should be presented. Also the weekly content should be more extended. In most parts of the course there are a lot of technical concepts, and the course lacks any type of resources. It should had been included the lecture slides and also external sources for further student development. Just having the videos to learn doesn't provide - again in my opinion, a very engaging learning experience. A small detail - in part of the course page the course is entitled Oil & Gas Industries, while in another place is entitled Oil & Gas Industry. A small detail but it should be corrected. This is my opinion. | courses that have a lot of | Content | and it is a bit disapointing | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| yJFvuj06EeWBrBIWi3mmCw | In my opinion the positive thing of this course is bringing a very important area to Coursera. But there are some things that I believe could and should be improved. First, Duke has presented courses that have a lot of content, and it is a bit disapointing to only see two modules on this course. At least four modules should be presented. Also the weekly content should be more extended. In most parts of the course there are a lot of technical concepts, and the course lacks any type of resources. It should had been included the lecture slides and also external sources for further student development. Just having the videos to learn doesn't provide - again in my opinion, a very engaging learning experience. A small detail - in part of the course page the course is entitled Oil & Gas Industries, while in another place is entitled Oil & Gas Industry. A small detail but it should be corrected. This is my opinion. | should be presented. Also the weekly | Content | should be more extended. In most | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| yn4BHt70EeWDLBKS83bB7Q | It is a good course to understand Satellite communication from system engineering point of view.Course content is well arranged to address Commercial aspects of Satellite communication, Application of satellite communication for different services. It also includes expert talk which gives insight in the Satellite communication for career point of view. | system engineering point of view. Course | Content | is well arranged to address Commercial | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| YNmbV0EkEeWBrBIWi3mmCw | Really great content! | Really great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | It is a good introductory course, but I think it should go deeper each week content. Being slightly more technical. I recommend this course. | it should go deeper each week | Content | Being slightly more technical. I recommend | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | repeat of the same material and content in multiple videos, the videos were sourced from too many different places leading to 1) decrease of consistent quality and 2) non sequential / logical teaching (each video does not clearly lead to or build on the next one) | repeat of the same material and | Content | in multiple videos, the videos were | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | Excellent content and professors!! | Excellent | Content | and professors! ! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | Excellent content, explanatory talks and with many examples that made easier understanding. | Excellent | Content | explanatory talks and with many examples | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | Could be even more details and demanding in terms of content, overall it is a good introduction to the topic | details and demanding in terms of | Content | overall it is a good introduction | Positive | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | This course is very easy, but the content is excellent and engaging. The assignment really makes you reflect about what is your city making for sustainability and also is inspiring to know what other cities around the world are doing for it. It should be part of our continuous education in sustainability. | course is very easy, but the | Content | is excellent and engaging. The assignment | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | I was somewhat disappointed with the content of this course. It seems shallow and disintegrated to me. Its difficult to say that this course provides some practical knowledge. | I was somewhat disappointed with the | Content | of this course. It seems shallow | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Excellent content, well explained. The flash lessons could be slightly better structured. | Excellent | Content | well explained. The flash lessons could | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | I did all four courses - the whole specialization. Each course in itself was aright and I learned new things. However, the course certificate is meaningless. It neither states the content nor the effort (for example the hours). Instead, it even says "non-credit course". This is despite the fact that the course equates "35 PDU's" and "counts towards the UCI Project Management Certificate Programm"; as it was described in the FAQ. I feel betrayed. How can I apply with such a meaningless peace of paper anywhere? | is meaningless. It neither states the | Content | nor the effort (for example the | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Very good course contents, easy to follow | Very good course | Content | easy to follow | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | The course contents is delivered in a very easy to understand manner. | The course | Content | is delivered in a very easy | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | It has not enough content, you can just read the chapters 5 to 7 of PMBOK, and its the textbook that you'll use in this course. | It has not enough | Content | you can just read the chapters | Negative | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Excellent content of the course | Excellent | Content | of the course | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Great Content. | Great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | It is better to merge the content of all 3 courses in one... very less content | It is better to merge the | Content | of all 3 courses in one. | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | It is better to merge the content of all 3 courses in one... very less content | in one. . . very less | Content | | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | I found the assignments challenging in the absolute best sense of the term, and therefore incredibly rewarding as well! Whenever I've gotten stuck, the answer was always in the course material somewhere, even if I didn't see it there at first. The discussion forums were extremely helpful, and I was astounded to see that that instructors were still actively monitoring the discussion forums and responding to student questions. I'm obviously not an expert in this field, but I've been an educator before, and my own impression of the assignments was that they were extremely well designed: it was impossible to pass them without knowing what you were doing, the tools to approach them were always found in the lectures, and the challenge problems pushed your knowledge even farther. I would recommend the specialization to everyone. Additionally, I noticed that the content aligns well with other DS&A syllabi I have seen in brick-and-mortar institutions, especially the first 3 or 4 courses. It's also a very nice luxury to be able to submit in Python. I have certainly learned a great deal. | everyone. Additionally, I noticed that the | Content | aligns well with other DS&A syllabi | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | The last two weeks' content may need to be revised to provide a better learning experience. To me, it seems a little bit too fast. | The last two weeks' | Content | may need to be revised to | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Great content followed up with good programming exercises. Please keep up the good work! | Great | Content | followed up with good programming exercises. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Great course with great content. Really enjoy the addition of support material and test cases for the difficult problems. | Great course with great | Content | Really enjoy the addition of support | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Course content is ok, but some lectors are really boring in explaining mathematical details. Tasks are pretty easy, and this is from algorithmic perspective, because from programming there are almost nothing to do. And overall it feels that there are not so much info as for 5 weeks course. If it would cost lest, than it would be ok. But for 80$ I've expected more. | Course | Content | is ok, but some lectors are | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Really awesome Course , Must take it as a software Engineer and if you have already learned these things , It will open your eyes and make you correct your mistakes. Simple explanations in videos and covering all intermediate data structures. Problems are also good companion to the course content and allowing us to implement in many languages . | also good companion to the course | Content | and allowing us to implement in | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| ypgDPuPQEeSyBSIAC9REKg | The course itself and the content of it is great, the only suggestions would be: 1) It could be reviewed, how the evaluations of each submission are made. For example, 1st assignment - descriptive analysis was asked to evaluate based on if the 3 "most important" things - if they have been mentioned in the description. The thing is that in real you can not tell, which are the most important because people think differently and could focus more on other details. It was easy to add also those "important" points by resubmitting work, but the problem is that only with that the analysis of a student is not getting better, thus the evaluation is not precise. For tasks like that I would suggest at lease to make a list of 20 things to mention and then count how many are there - thus making the quality assessment more precise. 2) Some topics could have been explained more detailed in the videos, e.g., about guide tones and lines 3) The requirements for the submissions could have been more clear. I also got the impression that in if switching the sessions the requirements could be slightly different (As I got the case when somebody pointed out a particular thing that he thought was required and I have not done. I checked the page but nothing about that. Also other classmates mentioned nothing about that and thought all was perfectly fine). I hope this helps. Thank you so much, Regards, Ance | The course itself and the | Content | of it is great, the only | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| ypgDPuPQEeSyBSIAC9REKg | While the content is very helpful and Gary does his best to make people confident to improvise in Jazz music, this course has imho two major flaws: The biggest one: assignments given and results accepted do not fit together. E.g. in week 1 learners are supposed to describe in their own words how a piece of music does sound like. But the accepted answers are totally different from such a description. Instead only a very detailed and specialized answer is accepted. This leads to studends copying these answers into their assignments without them learning anything. The other flaw is that Gary is very brief in his explanations. Even intermediate musicians seem to struggle with content just because some explanations are not exact or vague. | While the | Content | is very helpful and Gary does | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| ypgDPuPQEeSyBSIAC9REKg | While the content is very helpful and Gary does his best to make people confident to improvise in Jazz music, this course has imho two major flaws: The biggest one: assignments given and results accepted do not fit together. E.g. in week 1 learners are supposed to describe in their own words how a piece of music does sound like. But the accepted answers are totally different from such a description. Instead only a very detailed and specialized answer is accepted. This leads to studends copying these answers into their assignments without them learning anything. The other flaw is that Gary is very brief in his explanations. Even intermediate musicians seem to struggle with content just because some explanations are not exact or vague. | intermediate musicians seem to struggle with | Content | just because some explanations are not | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| yQcuJCOcEeagwg7hVay0BQ | Course content is great and professor is awesome. Thanks for sharing knowledge!! | Course | Content | is great and professor is awesome. | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| YUAc977OEeWk7gqXCJNO4w | I really liked this course. I think there was a lot of content covered in a short period of time and the way that it was presented kept me focused. I think the professor was able to present the information in an effective way. I would definitely recommend this course. | think there was a lot of | Content | covered in a short period of | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Good content as long as you have some familiarity with programing and computer configuration. | Good | Content | as long as you have some | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Good course, but I expected something a little more detailed and to last a little longer. The videos were good, but w little long for the amount of content that they contained. For instance, a few videos could be compressed to the size of one video and still contain the relevant content. | little long for the amount of | Content | that they contained. For instance, a | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Good course, but I expected something a little more detailed and to last a little longer. The videos were good, but w little long for the amount of content that they contained. For instance, a few videos could be compressed to the size of one video and still contain the relevant content. | video and still contain the relevant | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Great content, and I really like Prof. Harris' way of explaining things. | Great | Content | and I really like Prof. Harris' | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Good lecture and content. However, disappointing that even when I audit the course, I cannot take the exams. This is contrary to most of the other Coursera courses where you can. If you cannot afford to participate you have limited access to the testing material. I'm not impressed. | Good lecture and | Content | However, disappointing that even when I | Negative | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | A little light on content. Expected more interaction with features of the board. | A little light on | Content | Expected more interaction with features of | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Content was far too basic in my opinion. | | Content | was far too basic in my | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Mr. Harris is great! A lot of course content could be as a prerequisite. For example, basic control structures of the python could been left out, just having a reference to material describing them. I hope following course will focus more on Raspberry Pi specifics. | is great! A lot of course | Content | could be as a prerequisite. For | Positive | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| ywoUFzVxEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Maybe it would be better to add more exercises to assimilate better the content. Same as previous courses in the Specialization. | more exercises to assimilate better the | Content | Same as previous courses in the | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| ywoUFzVxEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very nice content and presented so nicely. Must read and highly recommended course for all managers and business analysts. | Very nice | Content | and presented so nicely. Must read | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| yXMpEJw3EeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | Probably the best course, although a bit short in content. I learnt a lot from it, thank you! | course, although a bit short in | Content | I learnt a lot from it, | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| z27B3GC0EeWHVg55pNeHQQ | Similarly to the other courses in the specialization, interesting, well structured and very well presented and with content made easy to understand. | and very well presented and with | Content | made easy to understand. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| z2uvwHGtEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Enjoyed the content and examples through the movies | Enjoyed the | Content | and examples through the movies | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| z2uvwHGtEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Awesome and interesting, gives you an insight into the area of memory and thanks to film clips, course content is entertaining and easy to remember | and thanks to film clips, course | Content | is entertaining and easy to remember | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| z2uvwHGtEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Liked the course, subject, content and faculty. | Liked the course, subject, | Content | and faculty. | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| z2uvwHGtEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | I enjoyed the content of the course. The lecturer was informative and interesting to watch/listen to and the selection of films was varied enough to make you think about the relevance of plot versus reality. I would recommend this course to my peers. | I enjoyed the | Content | of the course. The lecturer was | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| z2uvwHGtEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Excellent class, valuable information and emotional contents. Great teacher and great presentations. I would recommend this class to anyone. | Excellent class, valuable information and emotional | Content | Great teacher and great presentations. I | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| z2uvwHGtEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Great content and movies. Would have been even better if the professor spoke a little more loudly and perhaps there were guest experts. | Great | Content | and movies. Would have been even | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| z2uvwHGtEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | A course which is very informative and accessible to anyone. The use of movies to illustrate the content is a very intelligent idea, as such illustrations help to deepen what is said and at the same time makes the lesson much more memorable. | use of movies to illustrate the | Content | is a very intelligent idea, as | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| Z3yHdBVBEeWvmQrN_lODCw | There could have been more content and the course been more challenging, otherwise loved it! | There could have been more | Content | and the course been more challenging, | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| Z7-ViyT-EeW5pgpJEN0S6w | Great course but for the amount of content provided and how much was taught this course is certainly overpriced...still a good introductory course, teaching very basic stuff. | course but for the amount of | Content | provided and how much was taught | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| Z7-ViyT-EeW5pgpJEN0S6w | I am in the middle of the course and will continue till the end. The course does show an easy way how to develop a platformer with Unity3D. It covers a lot of subjects, although I have a feeling that I will need to read about Unity again later. Anyhow, it is too fast and the instructor does not really emphasize on important points. Sometimes he also fails to provide proper explanation of some important parameters. Also, the course is tutorial-oriented but it goes so fast I could not really follow the instructions. So, I ended up watching the classes through and do the tutorial later. But as I said, because the instructions are super-quick, I had to watch them again many times while trying to do the workshop. Maybe this is how it should be but I still feel that it could be a little slower and let be breath a little while trying to digest the content so that I can redo the work by my own after finishing the class. | little while trying to digest the | Content | so that I can redo the | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| ZgdEeNmtEeWIyg6KWmLgkQ | Great course. The lectures are helpful (and funny). The entry level should be low enough for beginners, but fast enough so that people with programming knowledge don't get bored. All content is available without purchasing the certificate. | programming knowledge don't get bored. All | Content | is available without purchasing the certificate. | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| zHCX4hJgEeaX4g6xdats6w | First week of 3 min video. Seriously we want to dive into the subject. And the last two weeks should have more content. Felt like much more copy and paste without understanding why you did that. Understand this should be introduction to Big Data... But the price you pay for the introduction is too expensive. | last two weeks should have more | Content | Felt like much more copy and | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | Very basic, it's like reading the table of contents of a guidebook 'How to become an Entrepreneur'. | it's like reading the table of | Content | of a guidebook 'How to become | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | The content is extremely practical for a new entrepreneur or person who is thinking about becoming an entrepreneur. It's engaging, succinct and actionable. | The | Content | is extremely practical for a new | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | The first two sections, in particular, offer a lot of value and content for people thinking about starting a business. The latter lessons are a bit less "mind blowing" but they still offer value and can serve as good reminders to those who already know the basics of business. | offer a lot of value and | Content | for people thinking about starting a | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | Disappointing, not different from a class presentation, poor in content, lousy instructor | from a class presentation, poor in | Content | lousy instructor | Negative | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| zn0YnhqsEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | GREAT COURSE! GREAT CONTENT AND EXCELLENT PROFESSOR. 100% RECOMMEND | GREAT COURSE! GREAT | Content | AND EXCELLENT PROFESSOR. 100% RECOMMEND | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| zn0YnhqsEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | It's a fantastic lecture. The content is clear and succinct. The lecturer is good at teaching the complex in a simply way. | It's a fantastic lecture. The | Content | is clear and succinct. The lecturer | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| zn0YnhqsEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The content of this course is very good to cover some greatest thinkers in human history. It is important to know them and their thoughts to understand the society and oneself. One thing could be improved is the exercises. They're repeative and fail to inspire me. | The | Content | of this course is very good | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| zn0YnhqsEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Great course taught by an even better teacher! The content is very rich and rewarding and it is explai | by an even better teacher! The | Content | is very rich and rewarding and | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| zn0YnhqsEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Amazing teacher. He has the clarity and simplicity. Lectures are sufficient enough to grasp the essence of the content. People may feel that it is easy to pass this course. I must admit that I was pursuing this course not for a grade but for understanding. I got it. Thanks to the course teacher. I completed other mooc courses in edx and other platforms.I competed a few. I going through two other mooc from coursera. I had a mixed feeling after attending other two courses from university of Amsterdam. But this course is the best mooc I have so far completed. I was so immersed in the teaching. I completed the course in five days. I am eagerly waiting for the MOOC on Modern sociological theories. There is some element of Eurocentric Focus. But we cannot expect everything one Mooc course. | to grasp the essence of the | Content | People may feel that it is | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| zn0YnhqsEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Excellent course. Very well and entertainingly presented. Very clear and informative content. Would love to it extended as a Part 2 to cover the more 'modern' Sociologists. | entertainingly presented. Very clear and informative | Content | Would love to it extended as | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| zn0YnhqsEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Excelent contents, it is exactly the same that I learnt at University of El Salvador | Excelent | Content | it is exactly the same that | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| zn0YnhqsEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Great course. Fresh and competent view of classic sociology. Weekly content is well balanced and the readings are very insightful. This course offers valuable insights about the sociology foundations that are still important today for evaluating social interaction. Thumbs up for a quality MOOC! | competent view of classic sociology. Weekly | Content | is well balanced and the readings | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Great content, very useful and practical (applicable to nearly everything you ork with) and presented in a very interesting way. The Graphics are genious | Great | Content | very useful and practical (applicable to | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | The supervisor and the content is extremely good. | The supervisor and the | Content | is extremely good. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | great intro class to statistics. Love the animation, teaching style and R lab exercises. The first class in coursera that video content and quiz are relevant. Highly recommended!!! | first class in coursera that video | Content | and quiz are relevant. Highly recommended! | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | It is really helpful to get an idea for statisctics. Examples, quizzes, assignments as well as R lab designed on according to content of class. There is no suprise. | R lab designed on according to | Content | of class. There is no suprise. | Negative | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | It's an excellent course. All the content is simple and easy to follow. Congratulations for such a great didactic. | It's an excellent course. All the | Content | is simple and easy to follow. | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This is a nice course...thanks for providing such a great content from University of Amserdam. Please allow us to complete the course as I have to wait till the session starts for week 2 lessions. | thanks for providing such a great | Content | from University of Amserdam. Please allow | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very helpful in understanding foundation of stats or Theory of Probability. All tutors were very effective in delivery of content even if you do not know stats. | were very effective in delivery of | Content | even if you do not know | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | In my opinion this course is a good way to learn basic statistics. I do think the R part and the statistics part could be more integrated in order to learn R better and to use it more efficiently. For me the studytime was double the time that was stated even though I was already familiar with some of the concepts and calculations. I feel like some weeks the subjects should have gotten a little more explanation with video's or other supportive material, maybe some assigments to make in order to check wether you know and understand the material. Maybe you could compare content and way of teaching to the Duke University statistics course, this is not a better course per se but does do some things differently whilst both teaching stats and R. | the material. Maybe you could compare | Content | and way of teaching to the | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Great course, innovative design, great content and Organization. Great teachers and didactic. . | Great course, innovative design, great | Content | and Organization. Great teachers and didactic. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| zN_XyjlAEeWCYBKNeFwojw | A comprehensive overview of web programming, good for a noob, or as a review whose previous web programming experience may have been limited to the national supercomputing consortium's free (now archived) HTML manual. The content of this specialization will get you up to speed quickly. As with all Coursera courses, it is up to you to unfold the concentrated content on your own time. This lecturer makes it easy to do so. I highly recommend this course! | free (now archived) HTML manual. The | Content | of this specialization will get you | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| zN_XyjlAEeWCYBKNeFwojw | A comprehensive overview of web programming, good for a noob, or as a review whose previous web programming experience may have been limited to the national supercomputing consortium's free (now archived) HTML manual. The content of this specialization will get you up to speed quickly. As with all Coursera courses, it is up to you to unfold the concentrated content on your own time. This lecturer makes it easy to do so. I highly recommend this course! | to you to unfold the concentrated | Content | on your own time. This lecturer | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| zo2jLrZHEeWVcRIZgPr_Xw | Great content, the videos and talks are very motivating and they give an exciting overview of the subject. Thanks for the great work. | Great | Content | the videos and talks are very | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| zo2jLrZHEeWVcRIZgPr_Xw | I enjoyed this class very much. All the content was very easy to understand and follow. I love the fact that I can pick up the materials on my phone or table through the app! Is very convenient. Before this class I had no idea 3D printing had been around for so long, I thought it was someone newer, it's amazing to see all the different applications it can be use for. | this class very much. All the | Content | was very easy to understand and | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| ZQDT5AS2EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | The course contents are great! But is such a big subject for a single course. This should be a specialisation. | The course | Content | are great! But is such a | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| ZQDT5AS2EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | Great insight into conducting for people at all levels. It's invaluable as a musician to have as many skills up your sleeve as possible and that's what this course helps with. The video lessons are quite long, but the multiple choice quizzes more than make up for that where other courses have little content and lots of complicated technology requests for submitting assignments. Perfect! | that where other courses have little | Content | and lots of complicated technology requests | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| zs3YSHQ6EeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Awesome Instructor. Amazing content and materials. Needed support on the final project. | Awesome Instructor. Amazing | Content | and materials. Needed support on the | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| zs3YSHQ6EeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | An excellent course. Well paced, comprehensive, delivers on many of the promises that the specialisation makes. My ranking above relates to course content and lecturer (who actively participates in the discussion forums). I do however have great disdain for Coursera's downright abysmal handling of course rescheduling that saw it magically reappear after being cancelled and announced to enrolled students only two days before assessed content was due. Numerous student concerns were subsequently brushed off by support staff. Highly unprofessional. | My ranking above relates to course | Content | and lecturer (who actively participates in | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| zs3YSHQ6EeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | An excellent course. Well paced, comprehensive, delivers on many of the promises that the specialisation makes. My ranking above relates to course content and lecturer (who actively participates in the discussion forums). I do however have great disdain for Coursera's downright abysmal handling of course rescheduling that saw it magically reappear after being cancelled and announced to enrolled students only two days before assessed content was due. Numerous student concerns were subsequently brushed off by support staff. Highly unprofessional. | students only two days before assessed | Content | was due. Numerous student concerns were | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| zSmzLR5LEeS6wiIACzGPEQ | Elementary content, unfortunately. | Elementary | Content | unfortunately. | Negative | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| zSmzLR5LEeS6wiIACzGPEQ | The course is extremelly good!To point out,the information is necessary in real life,in real life content! | in real life, in real life | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| zSmzLR5LEeS6wiIACzGPEQ | This course is very interesting, and everything is there should be known to start a business. But basically, it just says to respect everyone and everything. This course lacks some content. It repeats itself. It says the same things over and over again, just in different words. It's still a very good course, and it motivates you doing to do something with great values. | and everything. This course lacks some | Content | It repeats itself. It says the | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| zSmzLR5LEeS6wiIACzGPEQ | The content shown in the video lectures is a very nice overview of the subject but it feels somehow superficial, some more depth would be really appreciated. | The | Content | shown in the video lectures is | Negative | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| zSmzLR5LEeS6wiIACzGPEQ | Great contents | Great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| zTzjmvssEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | Even though the professor talks in a monotone voice, I was so fascinated by the course content that I was able to overlook it. | was so fascinated by the course | Content | that I was able to overlook | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| zTzjmvssEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | Thank you so much for conducting such a well paced course to the prelude of Greek's history! The course was simply fascinating! Professor Andrew's teaching style was very detailed, often humorous and also engaging. It felt as if I was really present in one of his lectures in the university classroom! The provided reading assignments also immensely helped in gaining an in-depth understanding of the course content! The active discussion forum gave me the opportunity to fine tune my learning through Q/As and additional articles for further reading, provided by the very generous, friendly and encouraging mentors! Looking forward to such a course in future, With best regards, Saoumitaa G | an in-depth understanding of the course | Content | The active discussion forum gave me | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| zTzjmvssEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | Best instructor and lectures covering the entire area..But Assignments should include more questions so that to cover entire content of course. | questions so that to cover entire | Content | of course. | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| zTzjmvssEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | It's just plain excellent. Great content and professor. | It's just plain excellent. Great | Content | and professor. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| zTzjmvssEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | Poor visual aids, course content and format. | Poor visual aids, course | Content | and format. | Neutral | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| zTzjmvssEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | This is an absolutely 5-star course. Educational, interesting, right-paced... It is very clear that the professor has a passion for the subject and is deeply knowledgeable. There are two questions after every video lecture, which focus on the most important parts of the lecture and also helps the student see if they understood the content. Reading assignments are relevant and interesting. End-of-the week quizzes are challenging, but can be completed very successfully if the student paid close attention to the subject. I would recommend this course to everyone who likes history or ancient cultures. I hope for a sequel, too! | student see if they understood the | Content | Reading assignments are relevant and interesting. | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| zTzjmvssEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | Excellent course! Very knowledgeable professor, yet easy and pleasant to follow. The programme is well structured and the content approached with some depth (considering the introductory nature of the course). I would have loved to see, though, a focus more on philosophy (pre- and post- socratic), visual arts and the Hellenistic period, as it is most of the times neglected, even in today's historical accounts. Hope to see more courses on Classical Studies soon at Coursera. | programme is well structured and the | Content | approached with some depth (considering the | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| zTzjmvssEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | Material is excellent, but new format for coursera pages is horrible. Hard to find anything, taking pdf dumps to create saved artifacts from class is completely broken, quizzes do not allow you to see your answers after you submit them even after you have finished the class so you have to remember to save the quiz answers before submission. Worst part for me is that you can only get a certificate if you agree to verified certificates which means giving coursera access to your webcam and also allowing them to save your typing patterns with to me I don't mind paying something for the courses, but will not use verified certificates as I have no need for their verification, and will only take on demand classes that use this format if they have content i really want. | use this format if they have | Content | i really want. | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| zwqURwiiEeahpQ5cgS1w4w | Really entry level course with not too much content. If you are a faster learner, you can expect to finish this course in a week. | level course with not too much | Content | If you are a faster learner, | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| zyGo9ph2EeSyKiIAC0EFDA | The two Grow to Greatness courses are fantastic and I would highly recommend them to anyone starting or running an existing business. The material is a great mix of theory and practical information and Professor Hess and his staff expertly bring the course content to life. His passion for the subject matter and his enjoyment of teaching clearly shines through, even on these taped lectures. Thank you! | his staff expertly bring the course | Content | to life. His passion for the | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| _3FDkYE5EeWuHwqbqMyacw | Some of the content are repetitive. The first interview sounds "staged". Some Korean reference ("noon sei" or something like that ) are non-value adding. | Some of the | Content | are repetitive. The first interview sounds | Neutral | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| _3l2SpONEeW2aQ7olstw0Q | Great content and clear explanations for a better understanding of the topic. I found very useful all the assignments to deepen my learning. | Great | Content | and clear explanations for a better | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| _aXKkBnJEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Excellent contents! | Excellent | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| _aXKkBnJEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Unfortunately there is no involvement academic staff so there is no assistance/support. The course is put out there and students are left to their own devices. The calibre of students is poor and informed discussions non-existent. A great pity because the content on occasion is interesting. | non-existent. A great pity because the | Content | on occasion is interesting. | Positive | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| _ehbrDx9EeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | Extremely useful and rewarding. The content is really worth the effort to listen and understand. | Extremely useful and rewarding. The | Content | is really worth the effort to | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| _ehbrDx9EeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | I would give this course 5 stars: it was excellent, both in content and in delivery. A true learning ex | stars: it was excellent, both in | Content | and in delivery. A true learning | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| _j_95QpWEeWoRw4pD4cXmw | My favorite course online this far (I have enrolled in 200+ and completed 50+ of them)! Great content, great instructors, fair and reasonable assignments. This course should be a must for everybody on this planet. I highly highly recommend it. I already loved Scandinavian countries, but now I also like Lund University a lot! | and completed 50+ of them)! Great | Content | great instructors, fair and reasonable assignments. | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| _j_95QpWEeWoRw4pD4cXmw | Learned a lot from this class. Greatly enjoyed the content. | from this class. Greatly enjoyed the | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| _j_95QpWEeWoRw4pD4cXmw | Good course with varied content and I very much liked the way it was build up (individual, business, cities, nations). Reason why I rated it 3 stars (only) is that the course was too easy - however I'm a sustainability professional. Maybe the word "introduction" can be taken into the title - as the course would serve as a good intro-course for practical application of sustainability. Geoffrey (The Netherlands) PS: the videos of the Parkers can be deleted from my point of view | Good course with varied | Content | and I very much liked the | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| _Mms-nE8EeWKsgrp3VnvAw | Great course. The instructors are very welcoming and clear. The course content covers all the Recruiting and Hiring basics for those who are non HR professional but also adds very important concepts for those who already works with it | very welcoming and clear. The course | Content | covers all the Recruiting and Hiring | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| _Mms-nE8EeWKsgrp3VnvAw | I think the course needs to be restructured in order to be more practical and in order to go more deeply into theoretical material. Most of the course is a little superficial. Most classes could be summarized. For exemple, in talking about selection procedures, the only tool discussed more deeply is interview. The was no discussion about personality, psychological test or other tools. Most contents of Amy`s classes are abstract. Stacy class, however is more practical. It is a nice course, but it can go more deeply into theory and most classes could be summarized. | psychological test or other tools. Most | Content | of Amy`s classes are abstract. Stacy | Positive | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| _Mms-nE8EeWKsgrp3VnvAw | I really liked the first three weeks of this course from Amy. The content was excellent. Amy has a very detailed, thorough teaching style. Very easy to listen to. | of this course from Amy. The | Content | was excellent. Amy has a very | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Very succinct and interesting content. Though provoking quiz | Very succinct and interesting | Content | Though provoking quiz | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | The course content is really good. However, in the last module, some sentence restructuring would be appreciated. | The course | Content | is really good. However, in the | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | I enjoyed a lot the course. Every Brazilian is a soccer coach and an economist, so I was very confortable with the topics and most of the content was more or less known, indeed. The best is that it does not seem to follow excessively on a ideological line. It seems to be open minded. I think it is great! Its excessive focus on industrialized countries is understandable. I think the last module about developing world seems too simplistic. I also think that opinions about american positions in the economic arena and happenings is somehow benevolent. I expected a more mathematical approach, but I see that it may not make sense since it is a introductiory course. I have not liked the exams, though, specially the final exam. They are much more about memorizing than deep understanding. | the topics and most of the | Content | was more or less known, indeed. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Good guide of Macroeconomics, but there are some sensitive contents for learners of China in the last few weeks. | Macroeconomics, but there are some sensitive | Content | for learners of China in the | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Very fruitful contents, and Professor explains everything with the good examples, so it was really easy to understand. I am thinking to enroll the MicroEcon course of him, too! | Very fruitful | Content | and Professor explains everything with the | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Too much contents in short lectures. Hard to catch up and to understand. The tests after each class are poorly designed. Most correct answers are the first choices. | Too much | Content | in short lectures. Hard to catch | Negative | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Before joining this course on Coursera, I had a little knowledge of economics. This course helped me to conceptualize the basics of macroeconomics. Now I am able to correlate the business environment or decisions to my job, salary hikes & other factors. Thanks to Faculty members from University of California, Irvine to provide such valuable & informative course content. | provide such valuable & informative course | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | The videos and content were engaging. | The videos and | Content | were engaging. | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | One of the best courses around in Coursera, with intensive contents and quizzes. At the end of these two courses (I took the Microeconomics as well), I totally grasped the fact that "economics is not something to memorize, but to conceptualize"!! | courses around in Coursera, with intensive | Content | and quizzes. At the end of | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | I took a CLEP macroeconomics exam solely based on the contents of this course, and I scored 74/80. Because of it, I did not have to take a macroeconomics course in the college and also learned everything I would have learned in the college course. | macroeconomics exam solely based on the | Content | of this course, and I scored | Negative | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| _xNLlFY4EeWKXg4Y7_tPaw | Muy buen curso. Very nice course. Loads of interesting things to learn. Maybe some compulsory readings would be nice and will help structure the content of the course. Still, very very interesting and quite mind blowing. Recommend it for sure. | nice and will help structure the | Content | of the course. Still, very very | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | This course has been structured in such a way that any individual would able to understand the contents without the prior requirement of learning the jargon. All presentations are nicely done, good and simple explanation. Examples were given in each lecture in order to enhance our understanding. | individual would able to understand the | Content | without the prior requirement of learning | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | Nice course, though much of the content is relatively basic and only qualitative (for a professional, might be good for a new student). Wouldn't recommend following *all* the advice (e.g. on topics such as debt) but it's anyway interesting to have the perspective, and it definitely makes very interesting points. | Nice course, though much of the | Content | is relatively basic and only qualitative | Neutral | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | Great intro course for learning how to manage your money. Interesting content and the quizzes are pretty relevant to the content. | how to manage your money. Interesting | Content | and the quizzes are pretty relevant | Neutral | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | Great intro course for learning how to manage your money. Interesting content and the quizzes are pretty relevant to the content. | quizzes are pretty relevant to the | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This course was really awesome! I enjoyed doing the assignments and the way how the content was being taught was impressive. Very good! | assignments and the way how the | Content | was being taught was impressive. Very | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This Course's content was so clear and so enlightening! I really appreciate these instructors strategy! so different! | This Course's | Content | was so clear and so enlightening! | Positive | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Thank you for the course, the only improvement i could think of is to improve contents for non English speaking people. E.g. You say decimal places, we say numbers after comma. Thank you! | could think of is to improve | Content | for non English speaking people. E. | Neutral | 0.5 | 4.0 |